Think Progress

Administration ‘loses’ Padilla interrogation tape.»

Jose Padilla, a U.S. citizen, was detained for four years without formal charges, much of it in solitary confinement. An independent medical expert say his repeated interrogations have made him mentally unfit for trial. Now, the judge in Padilla’s case has ordered the administration to turn over all tapes made of his interrogations, specifically a session from March 2004 while he was still held as an “enemy combatant.” But the administration says it lost the tape.

U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke was incredulous that anything connected to such a high-profile defendant could be lost.

“Do you understand how it might be difficult for me to understand that a tape related to this particular individual just got mislaid?” Cooke told prosecutors at a hearing last month.

Glenn Greenwald has much more.

50







Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date

50 Responses to “Administration ‘loses’ Padilla interrogation tape.”


  1. AshenShard Says:

    This administration has no problem presenting evidence or intelligence when it supports their ideology. However, when it does not or threatens their power, the information is either classified or ‘misplaced’.

    Despite the secretiveness of this administration, it is so easy to read. So sad.

    BTW, the reason these tapes were ‘lost’ is likely because what is on them is so incriminating that by itself would bring the entire administration down. If it was a tape of a non-citizen it wouldn’t be as large an issue, and would only lead to the firing of a few low ranking officials. The fact that Padilla is a citizen changes all that, which shouldn’t be the case, any use of such ‘interrogation techniques’ on any human should be a one way ticket for all in the administration to an extended stay in the pokey.


  2. RUCerious Says:

    How freakin convenient…


  3. Jay Randal Says:

    They did not lose it, they hid it so it will not be seen.



  4. CONservative Says:

    But the administration says it lost the tape.

    Yeah right.


  5. R Says:

    I remember well the missing minutes on the Nixon tapes during the Watergate scandal. Is Chimpy gonna get down on his knees with Rove and cry while praying for his salvation, too? He’s, The Decider!


  6. Abby Says:

    And we have the audacity to point our finger at other out-of-control regimes.

    Welcome to AmeriKa, folks.


  7. Jay Randal Says:

    If the tape has full frontal male nudity, with torture on it, then Bush has it in the Oval Office. Without Jeff Gannon around, Dubya needs porn.


  8. Patrick Says:

    This case needs a whistle blower. I’m sure thay have been destroying evidence since they “clenched” over the first Hamdan ruling.


  9. R Says:

    Jay- What’s with the “suggestions”, today? Feeling frisky?


  10. skeptic Says:

    Lose the tape. Right. If this is true some people need to be fired for gross incompetence. If this is not true the same people need to be arrested, tried and convicted for obstructing justice. Actually if I were a right wing nutcase, I would have the people who lost the tape tried and hanged for being part of a terrorist conspiracy and losing valuable evidence.


  11. Who is John Galt? Says:

    Lost? Yeah, right.


  12. R Says:

    I just wanna see “who” is doing “what” to “whom”. I can imagine Rumsfeld and Rove in leather and mesh…
    (Excuse me, while I throw-up… )


  13. Creature Says:

    Coming soon to a theatre near you: Dude, Where’s My Tape?


  14. nineteen84 Says:

    “Administration ‘loses’ Padilla interrogation tape.”

    When you can’t rewrite history, you simply lose it. When you can’t influence US attorneys, you fire them. When you don’t like a new law, you append a signing statement. When you can’t win an election, you rig the machines.

    Makes sense to me.


  15. Bluestocking Says:

    “Tape? What tape? Oh, that tape! Oh, we…ah…we couldn’t find it. No, sir, we don’t know where it could possibly be. No, seriously…we’ve looked everywhere, as hard as we possibly can. It looks like it might have gotten lost…yeah…that’s the ticket!”

    Shades of George Orwell’s infamous “memory hole” from “1984…


  16. upside00 Says:

    Why do the trolls never come out when these types of articles show up? Is it because they haven’t had their talking points yet from Pudge Boy Rover and Darth Cheney?


  17. DutchHenry Says:

    How can it be anything but standard op for the WH cabal.Be contemptuous to the Rule of law.
    Remember folks the man these haters of America take their orders from thinks he is not bound by any law.Won’t surprise me one bit if he thinks he must be Prez for life of America.


  18. Barbara Bush Says:

    … I have the tape…


  19. Sharon Says:

    The administration is looking for a Padilla stand in..They plan to find the ( tape) sometime in 2008 before the election..It will be released along with more edited, new, revised tapes of BenLauden…Look for it’s listing’s on your local tv guides around October 15, 2008…Blessings


  20. GSD Says:

    Ah, remember when the Republicans lost their minds over this:

    “Hillary Clinton lost her Rose Law Firm notes!”

    -GSD


  21. Briseadh na Faire Says:

    Comment by nineteen84 — March 10, 2007 @ 2:07 pm

    And when you can’t impeach an administration which violates the rule of law, you create Big Brother.


  22. Briseadh na Faire Says:

    Do you realize it is entirely possible that the judge may dismiss all charges due to prosecutorial misconduct?


  23. Jackie Rawlings Says:

    It wasn’t lost they have no case and this is their way out. They have kept this innocent man in jail and tortured him to the point he is now brain dead so they have no use for him anymore. This is how the Bush Administration used innocent people for the fake war. America is now the country that jails innocent people, torture them or kill them and then have lawyers that say Bummer.


  24. impeachcheneythenbush Says:

    Padilla is an American CITIZEN. What they have done to him they could do to every single one of us.


  25. EvilPoet Says:

    They “lost the tape” accidentally on purpose. Does the Bush administration have good intentions? Sure they do and it’s safe to let a fox guard the chicken house.


  26. Shane Says:

    And Ronald Reagan was a great President but during Iran Contra hearings he couldn’t remember to how many questions. Over 100 times I think.
    I guess since Reagan and Bush Sr. got away with everything these guys have always figured they will too.


  27. chartreuse dog Says:

    The ordinary remedy in court would be to dismiss all charges against Padilla, and that is exactly what the administration wants, isn’t it? Just dismiss the charges, and pretend all their illegal, unconstitutional activity never happened. I sincerely hope they will not get off that easily.


  28. Shane Says:

    Why do the trolls never come out when these types of articles show up? Is it because they haven’t had their talking points yet from Pudge Boy Rover and Darth Cheney?

    Comment by upside00

    On the plus side things are going so badly for them maybe they’ll disappear entirely.


  29. mbbsdphil Says:

    Congress has the exclusive right under the Constitution to impeach and try the president and vice president for “high crimes and misdemeanors”. Punishment is limited to removal from office. The Constitution does not, however, limit liability for breach of state or federal laws. These crimes simply have to be taken up in the appropriate courts. Karl Rove’s retirement project will be to keep prosecutors from finding enough to act.


  30. Bluestocking Says:

    The ordinary remedy in court would be to dismiss all charges against Padilla, and that is exactly what the administration wants, isn’t it? — chartreuse dog

    *************************************************

    Actually, I would be inclined to dispute that — I would be inclined to argue that what the administration not only wants but needs is for Padilla to be convicted of something, anything. A dismissal of the charges against Padilla would be tantamount to admitting that Padilla is not accused of having committed any crime — which would mean that the US government had no grounds for detaining him for over two years without access to legal counsel and allegedly subjecting him to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of his Constitutional rights as a US citizen. I find it almost impossible to believe (or at least, I certainly don’t want to believe) that the American people have fallen so far and become so utterly apathetic and complacent that the US government would be allowed to sweep their treatment of Padilla under the rug without some sort of legal and/or political hue and cry. They cannot afford to let Padilla out of their clutches at this point — because my feeling is that if he were ever to get his freedom, his case could potentially break the administration wide open (unless they bribed him to keep his mouth shut).


  31. Shane Says:

    20… I have the tape…

    Comment by Barbara Bush

    And may I say Babs that I like you so much better here than I did when you were, and I use the term loosely, First Lady.


  32. Marie Says:

    As the church lady used to say “HOW CONVENIENT!”

    Lying bastards.


  33. chartreuse dog Says:

    Bluestocking, #32, I agree that the administration would like to have been able to convict Padilla of something, but I think it’s worth it to them to forego that satisfaction if we will allow their activities to be swept under the rug. In Padilla’s shoes, I would be very concerned about a freak accident.


  34. freeman Says:

    This is really such a bummer ,now we’ll have to torture him all over again !


  35. Publicus Says:

    “A Convenient Lie”


  36. dixie blood Says:

    Do you realize it is entirely possible that the judge may dismiss all charges due to prosecutorial misconduct?

    Comment by Briseadh na Faire — March 10, 2007 @ 3:06 pm

    And the prosecutors will be immune from criminal or civil punishment. That’s not a balanced system and it’s one of the reasons I consider the entire legal system corrupt from top to bottom and back up to the top again!!

    Judges are corrupt, lawyers are corrupt, law makers are corrupt. There is no rule of law left in the USA. If Abu Gonzales is the AG then I’m not obeying the law — just like him!!


  37. Raymond Funamoto Says:

    Much in the SAME WAY the VA lost all the patients’ records on the laptop computer–THROUGH SHEER STUPID CARELESSNESS and FOOLISH MENDACITY!!!!! WHAT A BUNCH OF F*CK-UPS–TRULY THE GANG THAT COULDN’T SHOOT STRAIGHT NOR HIT THE SIDE OF A BARN–IF THEY WERE WILLIAM TELL, HE WOULDN’T HAVE A LIVE SON AFTER THEY GOT THROUGH FUMBLING AND STUMBLING OVER THEIR OWN FEET!!!!!


  38. whogivesadamnaboutDeadRachel Says:

    Couldn’t they be satisfied with simply losing sixteen minutes? The ones in which they were speaking in German while wearing swastikas (I have seen those old brownshirt photos and I swear I have seen Karl Rove in them…multiple times.


  39. JohnDWoodSr Says:

    Lost the damn tape.Damn the damn luck.That was the tape where Padilla confessed to treasonous acts and everything. Damn, how we gonna convict him now. Damn! Maybe the judge will let us do a re-enactment.Yeah-let’s ask her! Padilla can’t object cause he don’t have no stinkin’ rights anyway.Riiiiggghhtt.


  40. JohnDWoodSr Says:

    Just a thought-has anybody checked to see if the tape was posted on You Tube?


  41. Innocent Bystander Says:

    I’m surprised they haven’t lost Padilla yet. I


  42. Zooey Says:

    I’m surprised they haven’t lost Padilla yet. I
    Comment by Innocent Bystander

    No kidding. He is rather inconvenient to them.


  43. Scipion LAfricain Says:

    the tape was rented by Bush for 24 hours ( new release ) and while he was busy rewinding and fast forwarding, jacking off on the torture scenes the VCR screwed the tape and the NSA didnt have another copy


  44. links for 2007-03-11 « Voxefx Says:

    […] Administration ‘loses’ Padilla interrogation tape. […]


  45. beefeater Says:

    Isn’t this like the lost fbi files in the you know who white house?


  46. beefeater Says:

    How about the Rose Law Firm Files that Mrs. Bill Clinton couldn’t seem to find?


  47. Zooey Says:

    How about the Rose Law Firm Files that Mrs. Bill Clinton couldn’t seem to find?
    Comment by beefeater

    Not even an issue, idiot stick.


  48. Karim Says:

    How convenient.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
image Register imageimageRSSimageimage imageimage
image
image
View Most Popular
image
image
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
image
image image image
What We're About
image
image
Featured
image
image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



image
image
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)



image
Reports
image
image
imageTopic Cloud
image

image
imageArchives
image

image
imageBlog Roll
image

imageAbout Think ProgressimageimageContact UsimageimageDonateimage