A new Media Matters report documents how the 2006 midterm results have “had almost no effect on the guest lists of the Sunday chat shows: with the exception of ABC’s This Week, they’ve all continued to invite considerably more conservative guests than liberal guests.” Read the full report (and take action) HERE. A chart via Kevin Drum:

Liberal press my a**.
March 12th, 2007 at 4:23 pmPatrick1’s algorithm for synthesizing talking points is having a hard time keeping up with events, so his posts are getting even more random than usual.
March 12th, 2007 at 4:24 pmIs this because they have to send out a person each week to retract or deny that week’s bad news?
Will Russert ever have a Con on again?
How come Fox doesn’t acknowledge our killed soldiers?
March 12th, 2007 at 4:25 pm#2 oops, I posted this in the wrong thread, but Patrick1 should show up soon enough to make this same point.
March 12th, 2007 at 4:36 pmShouldn’t they all be in church confessing to their sins, how do they have time for TV?
March 12th, 2007 at 4:38 pmIn my opinion, anyone who is “progressive” or “liberal” (or intelligent for that matter) and who still watches television programming is a lazy fool.
With the developing internet, there are innumerable sources for both news and information that are easy to find and quick to access. And if you look to the “networks” for entertainment, you are mistreating your own mind and are willfully opening yourself up to the diabolical manipulation techniques that are imbedded in not just the commercials, but also in the programs themselves.
Other than not having access to the internet, there is no valid excuse for seeking meaningful information from “teeveeâ€. Such is both intellectually lazy and irresponsible.
I beg you to throw away your television and choose your movies/shows carefully and with at least some thought.
P.S. I worked for 11 years in advertising, public relations, and graphic communications with 4 of those years being with BBDO/Omnicom (at the time, the largest advertising group on the planet).
March 12th, 2007 at 4:45 pmGuess they don’t count the hosts.
March 12th, 2007 at 4:48 pm#6 – Tuber, I can understand where you’re coming from.
I use TiVo to record the series I like, and fast-forward through all the commercials. The only time I watch live TV is when there’s a debate or SOTU. It’s just so painful to watch Pres. Bush stumble through a speech, my partner refuses to be in the same room, it makes him ill to hear the mans voice.
I have a 37″ flat-panel LCD TV that doubles as my workstation monitor. I LOVE my gaming experience much more now!
March 12th, 2007 at 4:52 pm#4 – VerbalKint
You’re good.
March 12th, 2007 at 4:53 pmPatrick, Tim Russert is paid $5 million a year. He was given his contract by Jack Welch, a huge Bush supporter and longtime conservative republican. Russert has bragged many times that he has a lot to do with the show’s content. All your post confirms, once again, is that you don’t have the slightest idea what you’re talking about.
March 12th, 2007 at 4:53 pm#7 – Yeah, you’re right.
If they did, it would be somewhere around 90% Rep/cons to 9% neutral to 1% Dem/progs.
March 12th, 2007 at 4:54 pmGuess they don’t count the hosts.
Comment by Patrick1
If they did, it would be slanted towards repubs even more.
March 12th, 2007 at 4:54 pmGuess they don’t count the hosts.
Comment by Patrick1
Yeah Patrick Star, because the hosts are HOSTS, and the guests are GUESTS.
It’s easy if your synapses fire correctly….or at all.
March 12th, 2007 at 4:54 pmTuber, I hear you, but I just don’t agree with ignoring television. Television is where 80% of the American people get their news and information. If you want to know why so many Americans suffer under so many illusions, you need to keep track of the lies and distortion television disseminates.
March 12th, 2007 at 4:55 pmGood one Zooey. I think Peadick1 is busy tripping on his tongue today.
March 12th, 2007 at 5:03 pmRe: HOST vs. Guests: to discount the ideology or leanings of a Host is disingenuous as they DRIVE the conversation…….which Must have slipped by the astute Media natters whiners….I mean, “staff”.
Were you progressives called “crybaby” ALOT when you were kids?….
March 12th, 2007 at 5:07 pm#8 and #14,
I understand completely. One thing that I would like you to consider is the trust that you place in the broadcasters. I can tell you without reservation that such trust is misplaced.
I could go on for hours about just my personal knowledge and experiences that would rock you to your core. But just as a really quick “food for thought” item, one of you stated that 80% of Americans get their information from television. It is not non-related happenstance that the percentage of Americans who are obese is eerily similar.
Our brains are by far our most powerful and necessary muscle. Look at what Americans are feeding it. Or, in more cases than you can imagine, what is being force-fed to the brain.
March 12th, 2007 at 5:07 pmI beg you to throw away your television and choose your movies/shows carefully and with at least some thought.
Comment by Tuber
Absolutely. I don’t miss television at all. Most of it is pure stupidity, and advertising is insidious.
I never saw a moment of the feeding frenzy around Anna Nicole Smith’s death, or Britney Spears’ shaved head. Of course, I heard all about it from my FOX watching parents. *sigh*
March 12th, 2007 at 5:09 pmGood one Zooey. I think Peadick1 is busy tripping on his tongue today.
Comment by Shane
Shane’s on fire today. :D
March 12th, 2007 at 5:11 pmof course, for the conservatives, there are not three or four categories…you and i, and intelligent people, may realize that, in addition to conservatives, there are also moderates, liberals, and progressives.
but for the conservatives there are only conservatives and all the rest (conveniently and wrongly labeled liberal).
so, when the right looks at these numbers, they believe they are losing the battle, because- in their weird math – they only get about 40% and those “damn liberals” get 60%.
March 12th, 2007 at 5:14 pmMA: “Were you progressives called “crybaby†ALOT when you were kids?…”
Who’s been crying about the “liberal media” for decades now, a-hole?
March 12th, 2007 at 5:16 pmi agree with tuber, zooey, and others in this thread.
March 12th, 2007 at 5:27 pmi quit TV news a year ago, and TV altogether 2 months ago…life is better.
i will be seeking one out the next few weeks to watch basketball, but there are plenty of friends and sports bars for that.
You guys are stronger than I.
Not until I figure out what is up with that damned island am I giving up TV.
:D
March 12th, 2007 at 5:29 pmThey haven’t “got me” yet. I like Scooby Doo on Sunday mornings.
March 12th, 2007 at 5:37 pmIt is far more entertaining than the lies that are spewed on all the
news channels.
Not until I figure out what is up with that damned island am I giving up TV.
Comment by trueblue
I’m pretty sure it’s a dream someone on a Dallas Ranch is having. :-D
March 12th, 2007 at 5:43 pmHey Lady Z….Isn’t V.V. the previous M.A.?…..The one who had all the kid’s, was an attorney, had done everything, been every where, x service person and she did it all while being just 22 year’s old and sitting at a desk somewhere.? Right.? I thought so…I do try to keep up, but ,does it appear that the x M.A, now V.V. is a littlee paid cheer leader for the repub’s…..Quick, V.V, go cash that reich winged little check before your benafacter closes the account and you have to follow patrick to DUBI to get your fund’s….The rat’s are leaving you dear….
March 12th, 2007 at 5:49 pmZooey,
Wasn’t that the lamest?
Miniblue and I rented seasons I and II to try and find any clues.
We were left with more questions.
March 12th, 2007 at 5:56 pmgrrrr….
Yep Sharon,
MA is now VV, and even though she was outed as the sick f*ck liar she is, she has the balls to keep showing up to spread her filth.
March 12th, 2007 at 6:00 pmBD – I never was a “MO-oooM, it’s not fair…”, “even steven” crybaby kind of kid. That would be my younger sister…..naturally she’s a “progressive”…but we love her anyway!!
When TV news info was only obtainable from left leaning sources, conservatives filled the void and offered a new outlet. Of course, that got the hackles of libs up – but who cares? Don’t like Fox – go watch the others…
March 12th, 2007 at 6:01 pmAnd then we have the print media – BUT the enemy-sympathizers over at the NYT have seen their influence wane in the last few years…..
True,
I’m pretty sure they make up the script for Lost as they film it. I do miss the bare chests they had available once in a while. :D
March 12th, 2007 at 6:01 pmI quit watching the Corporate Whore News eons ago. When my boyfriend has The Today Show on NBC, I have to leave the room. I find it too damned irritating, not to mention full of lies and improper-gander.
March 12th, 2007 at 6:04 pmSawyer……..
rawr….
March 12th, 2007 at 6:05 pmMA, if you don’t believe any of us lefties, maybe you will listen to William Kristol: “I admit it,” he told a reporter. “The liberal media were never that powerful, and the whole thing was often used as an excuse by conservatives for conservative failures.”
March 12th, 2007 at 6:10 pmYeah Valient, we can tell you just take your lumps and don’t complain. Good girl.
March 12th, 2007 at 6:12 pmI’m not sure any of the cultists around here are aware of this, but the debate on whether or not FOX was a legitimate news service ended a few months ago when Rupert Murdoch told a British interviewer that he started FOX news to “press forward the republican agenda.”
March 12th, 2007 at 6:13 pmConservatives make for better television because they tend to say the most outrageous things.
March 12th, 2007 at 6:22 pmSharon – Thanks for your concern!!! Yes, as MA, I had a freak progressive cyberstalker who was offending progs and conservatives alike. You may have noticed, the poor thing is often afflicted by Tourette’s syndrome. But complete with a new moniker, “Valiant Venus”, I try not to respond to to that tortured soul. He’s just to pitiful for words.
Good to see you are well and nothing has changed…..I would have thought the Dems, with their “Power to the People” mandate would have pulled the funding for the war. Oh well….are you still upset with anybody who has 2 cents more than you? Or how unfair life is?
March 12th, 2007 at 6:27 pmYes, MA, nothing HAS changed. You’re still spewing strawman arguments and obfuscation.
March 12th, 2007 at 6:30 pm…the poor thing is often afflicted by Tourette’s syndrome.
V.V.,you must mean’ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus’.
March 12th, 2007 at 6:39 pmI expect since you’re here,he’ll show up soon.
Zooooettte – You’re so mentally agile (”yep, MA is VV…)!! But at least I don’t “purposely” split hairs and snarl at you vulgarly after failing with a clumsy passive-aggressive manuver…..It’s such a pleasure to watch progressives eat one of their own!! I haven’t had such a good laugh since Mr. “Quisling” Humanist graced our presence…..
Back on topic – Hopefully Progressives will find news outlets more in keeping with their version of the “truth”. Have you tried the BBC? Or Al Jezeera?
March 12th, 2007 at 6:59 pmIs that all you’ve got, Haggie? Pretty sad.
March 12th, 2007 at 7:10 pmZooooettte – You’re so mentally agile (â€yep, MA is VV…)!! Comment by valiant venus — March 12, 2007 @ 6:59 pm
As if a st*pid c*nt like you couldn’t be spotted from a million miles away – yeah, you’re agile alright – NOT!
But at least I don’t “purposely†split hairs and snarl at you vulgarly after failing with a clumsy passive-aggressive manuver…..Comment by valiant venus — March 12, 2007 @ 6:59 pm
Oh pUhLease! You do nothing but *split-hairs* and snarl *sh*t* at others – disguised as pithy family homilies little Ross Perot.
It’s such a pleasure to watch progressives eat one of their own!! Comment by valiant venus — March 12, 2007 @ 6:59 pm
Your pleasure in such an event, would explain why so many of your on GOP fools eat their own Mizz Foley!!!
I haven’t had such a good laugh since Mr. “Quisling†Humanist graced our presence….. Comment by valiant venus — March 12, 2007 @ 6:59 pm
Yeah, caring about *all* of the human race must be laughable to one of the *chosen-one-Toranimals* – eh? When you think the world is an *animal*, and only you are the chosen people, it’s much easier to put them in concentration camps, and joke about nuking them isn’t it?
Back on topic – Hopefully Progressives will find news outlets more in keeping with their version of the “truthâ€. Have you tried the BBC? Or Al Jezeera? Comment by valiant venus — March 12, 2007 @ 6:59 pm
Why, has News corp or Halliburton bought them as well? There isn’t a *version* to truth dum bass – there’s only truth. That’s why you fcuking morons are such a big fat joke (well in your case a st*pid little Anorexic joke). You’re too st*pid to differentiate your ignorant *opinion* from the *truth*.
March 12th, 2007 at 7:14 pmLOL……M.A…No I’m not complaining about not having two cent’s to rub together today….I got a $500.00 a month increase cause a terrible X beat me to the grave…..And since I put up with him long enough I get karmic justice served up to me every month…LOL..Retirement and survival skil’s are great….How’s the kid’s M.A.? Well guess you will have to wait 40 year’s before you get your’s…..Keep the job so you can keep the net service…
March 12th, 2007 at 7:22 pmSharon – Thanks for your concern!!! Yes, as MA, I had a freak progressive cyberstalker who was offending progs and conservatives alike. You may have noticed, the poor thing is often afflicted by Tourette’s syndrome. Comment by valiant venus — March 12, 2007 @ 6:27 pm
You’re such a professional victim, and serial whiner, st*pid c*nt. As for the Tourette’s Syndrome, that would explain the vile sh*t you try to pass off as ‘commentary’. It describes your st*pid opinions perfectly.
Now, how exactly did you have a *stalker* again? You mean a progressive, posting only on a progressive board, that you can’t resist coming to so much you change your name to continue posting on? Are you blaming others, for your *habits* again Haggard?
But complete with a new moniker, “Valiant Venusâ€, I try not to respond to to that tortured soul. He’s just to pitiful for words. Comment by valiant venus — March 12, 2007 @ 6:27 pm
Too pitiful for words is a great description for you Mizz Anorexia. You’re a poor tortured soul born in the wrong generation. Your fascination with *commies* in particular shows what a whack job you are.
Good to see you are well and nothing has changed…..I would have thought the Dems, with their “Power to the People†mandate would have pulled the funding for the war. Oh well….are you still upset with anybody who has 2 cents more than you? Or how unfair life is?Comment by valiant venus — March 12, 2007 @ 6:27 pm
Dems care about the troops of the welfare, just like we care for the poor. You care for neither, which is why you believe class warfare against the poor is moral, and call for defunding troops so you can starve them and play *victim* to the evil Dems. You’re completely fcuked in the head – loser b*tch.
March 12th, 2007 at 7:23 pmBD – I never was a “MO-oooM, it’s not fair…â€, “even steven†crybaby kind of kid. That would be my younger sister…..naturally she’s a “progressiveâ€â€¦but we love her anyway!! Comment by valiant venus — March 12, 2007 @ 6:01 pm
She is? Wow, that’s completely the opposite of your previous claims. Have you always been a pathological *liar*, or is that just a symptom of your Anorexia?
When TV news info was only obtainable from left leaning sources, conservatives filled the void and offered a new outlet. Of course, that got the hackles of libs up – but who cares? Don’t like Fox – go watch the others… Comment by valiant venus — March 12, 2007 @ 6:01 pm
Oh PUHLEASE. Most of the media has been controlled by Right Wing wealthy men like Hearst for decades. The *myth* of the left leaning media came from your hatred of media coverage of your immoral, and illegal behaviors – st*pid c*nt! The truth has a liberal bias, and you fcuking fools can’t stand either.
And then we have the print media – BUT the enemy-sympathizers over at the NYT have seen their influence wane in the last few years…..Comment by valiant venus — March 12, 2007 @ 6:01 pm
David Brooks influence has waned, along with the rest of your right-wing dum bass fools that have ruined the media. That’s why the blogs like this are so great, and why Tourettes sufferers like yourself can’t help yourselves. You open your traps, and the sh*t just keeps coming out, like a compulsive fool.
March 12th, 2007 at 7:28 pmRe: HOST vs. Guests: to discount the ideology or leanings of a Host is disingenuous as they DRIVE the conversation…….which Must have slipped by the astute Media natters whiners….I mean, “staffâ€.
Were you progressives called “crybaby†ALOT when you were kids?….
Comment by valiant venus — March 12, 2007 @ 5:07 pm
Says the “crybaby” c*nt that so hates hearing the truth she whines here every time it’s posted! You were a spoiled little c*nt weren’t you princess? And now you’re just bitter, and hateful – what a great parenting job your parents did! If they wanted to raise a loser!
March 12th, 2007 at 7:30 pmFine.
Since TP has deleted 3 of my non-offensive messages today, I will play your game……..
So, as I was saying, VVGFU, your posts remind me of a certain rYaN_ nEaT.
Eat that, friggin’ filters
March 12th, 2007 at 7:53 pmgreat. Now it’s back and I look like a skitz-zoid!
March 12th, 2007 at 7:54 pmGrrrr!
tB – Hmmmm, rYaN NeAt, MathehERmAPhRoDIte,vvgFu….I see a pattern…..
March 12th, 2007 at 8:22 pmgreat. Now it’s back and I look like a skitz-zoid!
Grrrr! Comment by trueblue — March 12, 2007 @ 7:54 pm
I disagree! You do not look like a skitz-zoid, you look like someone that has just had to deal with the frustrating filters :)
Do you really find my posts that offensive? For that I’m truly sorry. But unfortunately I find VV/MA terribly offensive. Anyone that calls for and cheers at the prospect of nuclear mass murder, and economic destruction of entire peoples, and makes jokes about their own dead children is beyond offensive for me. They’re pathologically disturbed.
What’s vulgar is her, not my words. Unfortunately words don’t adequately describe someone that vulgar in my opinion. But in deference to those such as yourself that are offended, this is why I filter them somewhat.
You’ve made it clear that you find that unacceptable – but please understand that while I hear you, I respectfully hope you can understand why I disagree with you.
March 12th, 2007 at 9:15 pmNOW WHY did TP decide my post to VVGFU was not post worthy?
I told him I though most of his posts were actually very funny.
That I had no problem with him.
Wow – terrible, isn’t it, TP?
March 12th, 2007 at 9:56 pmNow you all know why I avoided this place for almost 2 weeks……
Comment by valiant venus
Gee Terminally Venal – If you’re not Ann Coulter you do the best damn imitation I’ve ever seen. I bet you can’t get laid either. And you’re women – and I use the term loosely. You two are creating more male homosexuals exponentially and that’s really not fair to real women. On the plus side, many women are going straight. Scared that way by you and Coulter – if you’re not one and the same as I suspect.
March 12th, 2007 at 11:07 pmExcellent.
Americans obviously love hearing the conservative ideology over that democrat feel good mumbo jumbo nonesense. LMAO
March 13th, 2007 at 12:06 amNOW WHY did TP decide my post to VVGFU was not post worthy?
I told him I though most of his posts were actually very funny.
That I had no problem with him.
Wow – terrible, isn’t it, TP?
Now you all know why I avoided this place for almost 2 weeks……
Comment by trueblue — March 12, 2007 @ 9:56 pm
The filters seem to key off of certain words. Not sure why your response was filtered – but thanks for the kind words. I have no problems with you, or your criticisms of me either.
Don’t avoid TP, just try to figure out what words are getting filtered. And in deference to you and the ever sensitive Zooey, I’ll even try to reduce my *vulgarity* quotient on occasion when responding to Mighty Anorexic ;)
March 13th, 2007 at 12:59 amWhy the election in 2000 and 2004 was lost. Quite simply the Democratic ticket didn’t get the full support it
needed because the “fringe groups” Nader, Greens, Kucinich et al, their “outsourced vote” was enough to tip
the balance both times and now we are stuck with this Iraq mess and a mess at home too.
You “fringe” supporters had best buck up and decide if you want a Republican or a BONAFIDE “SUREFIRE”
WINNER IN A DEMOCRAT next time in 2008.
“En Masse Unity” is what will be required in 2008 to bring this whole house of cards down forever.
In other words, stop “stealing” the election FOR THEM!
Vote Democrat
March 13th, 2007 at 2:12 amWHICH PUTS TO REST, ONCE AND FOR ALL, OF THE MYTHICAL MYTH OF THE “LIBERAL MEDIA BIAS” on TELEVISION, IN PRINT, AND RADIO–HAH!!!!! THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS AS “LIBERAL” AS AN USED PAIR OF Clarence Darrow’s OLD SUSPENDERS!!!!! ONLY WE, THE WARRIORS OF THE BLOGOSPHERE, ARE TRUE “FIRE-BREATHING”, “ACID-VENOM SPEWING” LIBERALS WHO ARE UN-AFRAID TO TACKLE THE INJUSTICE AND DEMAGOGIC INNUENDO AND MISINFORMATION, NOT TO MENTION THE PSYCHOBABBLE GOBBLEDYGOOK THAT COMES OUT OF Bushland Uber Allies TALKING HEAD Tony “Colostomy-Bag-MAN” Snow-JOB and his allies Richard Wolffe and other MEALY-MOUTHED QUISLINGS THAT ROLL OVER FOR AND TOW THE Bushland Uber Allies PROPAGANDA LINE, LIKE THE MAJORITY OF THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA ON T.V. , IN PRINT, and ON THE RADIO. WITH OUR E-MAILED FISTS, WE E-WARRIORS WILL FIGHT AND SMITE THE EVIL EMPIRE of Bushland Uber Allies AND ITS MYRMIDONS!!!!! YEEEEHHHHHAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!! HELL FOR W’S!!!
March 13th, 2007 at 9:16 pmRorie
I think God approves of you.
March 18th, 2008 at 4:36 am