Snow on Bush involvement: ‘Anything’s possible.’
Snow on Bush involvement: ‘Anything’s possible.’
Just out from the AP:
The White House on Friday backed off its earlier contention that then-White House Counsel Harriet Miers first raised the idea of firing U.S. attorneys — an act that led to a firestorm of criticism of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
“It has been described as her idea but … I don’t want to try to vouch for origination,” said White House press secretary Tony Snow, who previously had asserted Miers was the person who came up with the idea. “At this juncture, people have hazy memories.” […]
Asked if Bush himself might have suggested the firings, Snow said, “Anything’s possible … but I don’t think so.” He said Bush “certainly has no recollection of any such thing. I can’t speak for the attorney general. I want you to be clear here: don’t be dropping it at the president’s door,” Snow said.
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
108 Responses to “Snow on Bush involvement: ‘Anything’s possible.’”
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
And as President of the United States he can fire anyone in the Executive Branch for any reason. That pesky Consitution again gets in the way of the moonbats wet dream.
March 16th, 2007 at 12:53 pmLet’s make it clear - Charlie didn’t do those things - he was at the Ranch the whole time.
March 16th, 2007 at 12:55 pm“…don’t be dropping it at the president’s door.”
Picking it up off his desk is more appropriate!
Impeach!
March 16th, 2007 at 12:55 pmAh yes, the “hazy memory” defense.
Good luck with that…
March 16th, 2007 at 12:55 pmThanks, for the hazy memories, la la ta ta da, dum te dum de da…
March 16th, 2007 at 12:57 pmDamn, I missed first place again!
However, that “pesky,” “God Damned piece of paper” again gets in the way of King George the Dumb ILLEGAL acts because ILLEGAL equates to “High Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
IMPEACH!
March 16th, 2007 at 12:58 pmAnd as President of the United States he can fire anyone in the Executive Branch for any reason. That pesky Consitution again gets in the way of the moonbats wet dream.
Comment by Patrick1
Okay, I expect Bozo Gonzo to be gone by the end of the day.
March 16th, 2007 at 12:59 pmImpeach for what?
March 16th, 2007 at 12:59 pm“At this juncture, people have hazy memories.â€.
Yeah, right. What a bunch of liars, These bastards need to go.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:00 pm“Don’t be dropping it at the president’s door…the buck doesn’t stop here, ya know. He can’t be responsible for the actions of his underlings…the president doesn’t “do” responsibility.”
March 16th, 2007 at 1:00 pmI wonder if the RNC or Rove will fire Patsy for his lousy defense of the “talking points” these last couple of days.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:01 pmGod forbid anyone drop anything on that wanker’s door! He might throw a tantrum and drive his car through someones garage door or something!!!!!!!
Little GW Puss always has to be protected from himself–started with Mommy Barbara, continues today with TurdyBlossom and anyone else around him. What the hell kind of psychic power does he have over everyone that they will NEVER hold him accountable for his own stupid choices?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:01 pmWow. That answer has the smell of desperation about it.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:01 pmComputer says no.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:02 pmGotta also wonder if The AG has a new nickname, ala
March 16th, 2007 at 1:02 pmAlberto “Hot Potato” Gonzales?
If Bush cannot remember firing someone who irritated him, then maybe he should be in an old age home being tended by people in white coats.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:03 pmBoy, for the leaders of the last super power on Earth, these people have terrible memories.
I think a new requirement for presidential candidates and their appointees needs to be a memory test. They could play that children’s game called Concentration.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:05 pmSnow is right. Anything is possible from this administration. Anything. Be it legal, illegal, destruction of the earth, wrong becomes right, etc.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:06 pmOnce again, the current Press Secretary shows his brilliance with such eloquence. His mastery of back-peddling makes him one of the most brilliant of all Press Secretaries. Just Brilliant.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:06 pmYes, it’s funny how under testimony thier recollection becomes faded and hazy. That, in itself, is LYING UNDER OATH. I would simply adore to see all thier lousy, miserable asses nailed, BIG TIME. Things are looking like I may get my wish. Would that not be all too divine? And just in time for the Jewish holiday, too! Shalom.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:07 pmAnd as President of the United States he can fire anyone in the Executive Branch for any reason. That pesky Consitution again gets in the way of the moonbats wet dream.
Comment by Patrick1
So why not just come out and admit that he fired them?
Because nobody has done that mid-term before (nope, not Clinton, not Reagan, not even Poppy); and people will still want to know *why* they were fired, given that they had good performance reviews; and people will come to the conclusion that they were fired for political expediency; and people will have additional evidence that this administration does in fact value party and patronage over country.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:08 pm“At this juncture, people have hazy memories.â€
How f-cking convenient.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:08 pmThe Great and Powerful Snow Job has spoken. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!
March 16th, 2007 at 1:09 pm#8 Patsy
FRWD for starters.
FRWD (False Reigning While Dumb) is a Capitol offense punishable by having to share a cell in Leavenworth with “The Dick” and KKKarl.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:10 pmPatrick1,
why are you not commenting and defending the AG in the thread about Gonzales’ hand in the cookie jar. It’s called: CAUGHT ON TAPE: Gonzales lied under oath
Republican loyalty?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:10 pmCome’on Patrick1 ….stir it up some more you antagonist sh*tbag:)
March 16th, 2007 at 1:11 pmHey Patty, I notice you have absolutely nothing to say in response to the clip of Gonzales clearly and indisputably LYING UNDER OATH!! Truth too much to handle?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:11 pmComment by doro
You noticed the lack of defense from Patty on that thread too eh? haha A case of silence speaking a thousand words.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:13 pmAt about the same time as this misadventure got underway Bush was on the stump talking about the political capital he earned with the 2004 election win and how that political capital would be spent.
With that in mind, Bush could very well be the mastermind behind this mess. In fact, as badly botched as it was suggests that Bush had to have a direct role. Nothing gets this badly botched without Bush getting involved.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:14 pm# 28
Yep.
Ain’t these republicans nice?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:15 pmPatrick1 sez:
Well, how about lying under oath, for starters?
Hey, if it was a good enough reason to impeach Bubba, it’s gotta be a good enough reason to impeach Gondo, right?
(I do love it when rightards paint themselves into the corner… ^_^ )
March 16th, 2007 at 1:15 pmFunny how memories fade so fast when a scandal is brewing. I can only hope I can forget the entire Bush Administration some day, when they have been impeached!
March 16th, 2007 at 1:15 pmYes, it’s funny how under testimony thier recollection becomes faded and hazy. That, in itself, is LYING UNDER OATH. I would simply adore to see all thier lousy, miserable asses nailed, BIG TIME. Things are looking like I may get my wish. Would that not be all too divine? And just in time for the Jewish holiday, too! Shalom.
Comment by Jesus Christ, son of God
How dare you impersonate my personal savior. I am a fine Christian woman and take offense at what you attempt, and all for political gain, too!
March 16th, 2007 at 1:15 pmActually, no he can’t. He can nominate people, he can temporarily appoint them when the Senate is in recess, but in actual fact there is nothing in the constitution which gives him the power to fire anybody over anything.
As such, the next step down is civil and criminal law - which if it is anything like South African law would make for an interesting case should any of those he has fired bring forward a suit for unfair dismissal.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:15 pmWhoops….my previous post was in response to patrick1’s vapid question: “Impeach for what?”
March 16th, 2007 at 1:16 pmIts obvious that the more response given to the trolls (and I’m guilty of it) the more their little under appreciated egos feel appreciated and the more bile and false statements they spew. Why not everyone (myself included) make a commitment to not answer their taunts and misinformation? We aren’t going to educate them no matter how hard we try because they are uneducable. There is an old saying that goes “Its better to be wanted for murder than not wanted at all.” Perhaps if we stop troll responding they will realize they are unwanted and find a nearby freeway overpass to curl up under.
Just a thought.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:17 pm#28-
March 16th, 2007 at 1:18 pmI think we wore the poor girl out this morning, already. She needs to freshen up and douche herself, a bit. -heh-
Bush wants to throw Miers under the bus to save Rove. She is being scapegoated, so Harriet should spill the beans on Karl to the press.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:18 pmHe is the chief executive officer and as such as the authority to terminate any member of that branch. That damn Constitution again gets in the way of the left’s wacko dreams.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:19 pmComment by Bruce Gorton — March 16, 2007 @ 1:15 pm
Bruce, your wasting your breath….. They will claim that it is “implied”…….
Despite the fact that it does not say he has that authority. After all…… A kink can do what ever he wants.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:20 pmIts obvious that the more response given to the trolls (and I’m guilty of it) the more their little under appreciated egos feel appreciated and the more bile and false statements they spew.
Yeah, we’re all guilty of it in here. But does anybody notice…not a word from ‘independent’ Joke, or fairyhead, or venomous vermin or the rest of the water-carriers. Fox Noise not given them their Karl Rove-generated talking points yet?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:22 pmSo WHICH version(s) should one take at face value?
…the one(s) told when the story first broke…
…or the one(s) being fed right now?
…Looks like old Snowjob has at least learned something from Scott McClelan…
…and Bushiva (and his minions) have taken on Ronnie Raygun’s dementia…
…who says this WH has no historical perspective…
March 16th, 2007 at 1:24 pmTypo…..
After all…… A kink
should read A king
March 16th, 2007 at 1:24 pmRemoveBush
And I will just reply that the law doesn’t give a shit what is implied - it says what it says and that’s it.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:24 pmHe is the chief executive officer and as such as the authority to terminate any member of that branch. That damn Constitution again gets in the way of the left’s wacko dreams.
Comment by Patrick1
What gives, are you the only one on the TP beat today, layin down the same talking points over and over now matter how detached from reality they/you might be? I know they’ll all be around later but usually you propaganda-pushers are here en masse.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:25 pmHow does Tony Snow not trip and fall down when he backpeddles so fast?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:26 pmSaying “Anything’s possible … but I don’t think so” is a long, long, long way from “no” in Washington. It’s basically saying “probably, but they’re not telling me, and hopefully you won’t be able to prove it.”
March 16th, 2007 at 1:27 pmHey, Trolls!
March 16th, 2007 at 1:28 pmThe impeachment issue won’t be if they could be fired; it’ll be why they were fired. The Bushies were trying to strong-arm federal prosecutors to drop certain investigations, start investigations into nonexisting Dem vote-tampering — obstruction of justice, conspiracy, that sort of thing. And we still don’t know what they successfully got other federal prosecutors to agree to! Pass the popcorn!
How does Tony Snow not trip and fall down when he backpeddles so fast?
Comment by bobcat_grad
Good question. I was gonna say from his experience on Faux News, but then I remembered, they didn’t backpedal, they just keep repeating the same talking points like a parrot…a lot like the suck-ups who come on here defending this criminal cabal.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:30 pmRemoveBush
I kind of thought it fit.
After all, torture is kind of the Republicans thing nowadays innit?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:30 pmThe ever circulating buck.
Because it’s not like the President is in charge or anything.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:31 pmIt’s really funny how the right-wingers talk about upholding the constitution when they are the very ones who ignore it and even break it when it suits thier cause. Sorta like how the Christians use religion. It’s the same application of: Heads, I win- Tails, you lose.
Well, I think most people are wise to that crap, now. It took this past six years to shake us all into a state of opening our eyes wide and looking around to see and know and recognise. I don’t think we’re afraid of being forced into a state of blind faith, anymore. That’s a GOOD thing- so sayeth Martha Stewart.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:31 pmCONservative:
I’m here - does that count?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:31 pmHe is the chief executive officer and as such as the authority to terminate any member of that branch.
Comment by Patrick1
Then why not come clean, and give exact details as to the step that led to, according to you, perfectly legal and ethical dismissal of US Attorneys that he himself had appointed a few years previous?
Aren’t you curious what the administration’s reasoning was for firing eight Bush-appointed attorneys that had already received good performance reviews? Aren’t you just the LEAST bit curious what those eight were working on?
Perhaps they were able to put their partisan views aside and were investigating Republican misconduct?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:31 pmOf course Patrick-the-intellectual-coward is dodging the thread about Gonzales lying on the record. Earlier today he had to flee the Walter Reed thread after being confronted by some facts that made him uncomfortable.
So Patrick, someone here posed the question: if everything has been legal and constitutional, why are you and the Bush team so scared right now? You are fighting like cornered animals, but over what? Testifying under oath? That’s all it takes to scare the crap out of your Leaders?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:33 pm“I want you to be clear here: don’t be dropping it at the president’s door,â€
instead of good cop/bad cop, he’s playing stupid cop/stupid cop
March 16th, 2007 at 1:33 pmWith the exception of the automaton Patrick, the trolls are curiously quiet so far.
Well….here’s Jake. Has he been rated a troll yet?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:33 pmAren’t you curious what the administration’s reasoning was for firing eight Bush-appointed attorneys that had already received good performance reviews?
Comment by bobcat_grad — March 16, 2007 @ 1:31 pm
If there is one trait sorely lacking in Bush’s followers, it is curiousity.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:35 pm“After all, torture is kind of the Republicans thing nowadays innit?
Comment by Bruce Gorton — March 16, 2007 @ 1:30 pm”
Yes it is… I am so sad to what we have allowed our country to become.
I am really ashamed of what “we the people” have allowed.
If it was not for “US” letting them do it, they would not be able to. We sit on our hands and let them, so they just keep moving the line.
One day we won’t have a shred of morals in this country because the Repubs will have erased them all.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:35 pmWell….here’s Jake. Has he been rated a troll yet?
Comment by Zooey — March 16, 2007 @ 1:33 pm
Zooey, I am rating Jake one notch higher than mere troll: volunteer RNC foot soldier.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:36 pmI’m here - does that count?
Comment by Jake
Hey where ya been? Must have missed ya while we’ve been trying to figure out why Patty had nothing to say to the clip of Bozo Gonzo lying under oath…
March 16th, 2007 at 1:37 pmWe are talking about a perfectly legal act within the rights of a US president, right?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:38 pmNO NO NO!! You will not impeach Bush. I’m nervous of the idea that he could be kicked out of office, but my mouth waters for the idea of saying he will NOT leave office, and getting the military to back him as he declares Emergency Powers and gives himself an emergency term.
The liberals aka the traitors? They’ll be gone if you get my drift.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:40 pm#57- You mean Patsy’s evil twin? I think they are the same, identical creature with interchangable names. Sort of like a schizophrenic on steroids.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:40 pmNomination for dumb “question” of the day:
We are talking about a perfectly legal act within the rights of a US president, right?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:40 pmComment by Roger_Roger — March 16, 2007 @ 1:38 pm
Article II section 4
Damn that pesky Constitution huh pitter patty 1.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:41 pmWe are talking about a perfectly legal act within the rights of a US president, right?
Comment by Roger_Roger
Here we go…some of us were beginning to notice how quiet it was in here today except for Patty. Good to see you and Jake join us today…
March 16th, 2007 at 1:42 pm62 Roger, aren’t you the least bit curious over what the President has to hide if he’s abruptly and unusually (even if legally) firing his own staff who just got good performance reviews?
Aren’t you the least bit curious why they feel the need to be evasive about it or their reasoning behind it? If what they’re doing is so legal, what are they hiding from, why are they afraid to talk about it?
What have they got to hide if they’re so innocent?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:42 pm“We are talking about a perfectly legal act within the rights of a US president, right?”
firing an attorney in the middle of an investigation that led to the indictment of the #3 in the c.i.a., not to mention at least one repub. congressman? that seems on the up and up.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:43 pmJudging by the troll comments on the Attorneygate and Plamegate scandals, it appears that they simply do not grasp the meaning of the words “obstruction of justice.” I suppose this isn’t surprising given their love of authoritarianism, hatred of the Constitution, and general contempt for the rule of law,
March 16th, 2007 at 1:43 pmI think Dubya, Beto, and Snow Job ought to be taken to Gitmos memory improvement room… I hear people remember all kinds of shit after a short stint in there.
All three have endorse their results… why not use their services themselves?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:44 pm“getting the military to back him as he declares Emergency Powers and gives himself an emergency term.”
the video store wanted me to tell you that they want their copy of “red dawn” back
March 16th, 2007 at 1:46 pmI’m nervous of the idea that he could be kicked out of office, but my mouth waters for the idea of saying he will NOT leave office, and getting the military to back him as he declares Emergency Powers and gives himself an emergency term.
Comment by firehead
All at once? Do you all like share a dorm room or something? Now to answer your question, I’m nervous too…but at what your mouth waters for. I wouldn’t put Bush declaring martial law to extend his presidency (and by extension this illegal, immoral war) past him for a second. He already stole it twice, why not go for the trifecta?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:46 pm#70 - they’ve got (Manson) Family Values!!!
March 16th, 2007 at 1:46 pmCONservative:
I have a life outside this blog, thank you very much.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:48 pmNope, that is what you are talking about. We are talking about reality.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:48 pmYeah, I go to Fox news to see the latest hot teacher that was having sex with a student.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:48 pmNo, Roger. We’re talking about obstruction of justice.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:53 pmNo one has mentioned the use of the Patriot Act to get these attorneys appointed. Sure, other presidents have replaced US attorneys, but here they have used the Patriot Act to specifically circumvent Congress. That is the real issue and the abuse of power proof needed for impeachment (as if there isn’t enough already).
March 16th, 2007 at 1:55 pmZooey, I am rating Jake one notch higher than mere troll: volunteer RNC foot soldier.
Comment by VerbalKint
Seems appropriate.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:56 pmThanks, VerbalKint.
Screw the trolls. Read the new post.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:57 pmI’m here - does that count?
Comment by Jake #53
Hey Jake…
…once again, if you’re such an “Independent” (not supporting either party)…
…you should take your new found…
…â€Independenceâ€â€¦
…and lobby the right wing congressional and senatorial TRAITORS…
…to cease and desist their obstruction…
…of Democratic efforts…
…to save the troops’ lives…
…and stop the graft, waste, fraud and corruption…
…of war profiteers…
Whaddaya say Jake…
…do you HATE liberals…
…more than you love your country’s best, bravest and brightest?
March 16th, 2007 at 1:57 pmEarlier Patrick or one of the other lower life forms stated emphatically that as “chief executive” Bush has the authority to fire “anyone” in the executive branch.
Wrong.
The executive branch includes every agency of the Federal government - what Patrick and the others complain about as the “bureaucracy.” Every civilian employee of the executive branch is covered by a multitude of federal personnel laws that protect us (I am a federal employee) against madmen like Bush firing us for less than good cause. Bush can fire any of the Schedule C folks because they are political appointees. As has been repeated so often in the lies trying to cover up the US Attorney purging, those political appointees “serve at the president’s pleasure” (and I wish one of them would pleasure the president so we could impeach the bastard).
Bush cannot reach down into the ranks of GS-15s and lower civilian employees and fire us. We can be transferred to a oil storage tank field in Newark or to the Barrow Alaska Country Club for screwing up. But the “president” cannot fire me or any other civilian employee.
Check the facts Patrick.
March 16th, 2007 at 1:58 pmWhy the endless desire to communicate with pat ? Right wing view points well backed up have a place here and propel the discussion . Nonsense not backed up and obscenities only help the opposition and are disempowering .
March 16th, 2007 at 2:01 pmDamn I never thought I’d miss jason Hendler or Seixon but they atleast civilly and eloquently presented a counterpoint to my opinions .
Jake and roger aren’t doing too bad but many of the obscenities and name calling used by supposed left wing bloggers toward them and others who have remained civil in their responses have made the left look bad .
TP should ban the obscenities , foul language, and outright rude behavior which has so prevalent here of late.
Don’t underestimate the power of your blogging ,it serves as a heads up for the establishment and I believe led to a fair election,more or less ,in the face of electronic voting !
I believe that most appointees in the current Administration and most other Administrations in recent history serve and served “at the will of the President” not because of any Constitutional right of the President to fire them but because they were all forced (extortion, coercion) to sign undated letters of resignation. There are also laws covering the unjust termination of an employee of which removal for political reasons is probably high on the list. All this aside, however, the primary malfeasance in this case is the involvement of lower level political hacks and the key to the issue as Tricky Dick found out: “It’s the cover-up Stupid.” Lying under oath, conspiracy, obstruction of justice are all impeachment offenses. Had King George the Dumb just said to the Attorneys “I accept your resignation” there is not a thing that could been done except the usual screaming, shouting and gnashing of teeth. However, KGtD lives up to his crown and will go down to Leavenworth.
March 16th, 2007 at 2:02 pmNo one has mentioned the use of the Patriot Act to get these attorneys appointed. Sure, other presidents have replaced US attorneys, but here they have used the Patriot Act to specifically circumvent Congress. That is the real issue and the abuse of power proof needed for impeachment (as if there isn’t enough already).
Comment by Bob — March 16, 2007 @ 1:55 pm
March 16th, 2007 at 2:04 pmWOW thats WOW
Comment by tom baker #74
Good one tom…
…or more like (Gambino) Family Values!!!
…either way…
…they’re taking us on a ride…
…from which we may NEVER return…
March 16th, 2007 at 2:06 pm“Hazy memories” says Tony Snow.
This was only 3-4 months ago, not 3-4 years ago. And it was clearly a priority political item.
What kind of fool does Tony Snow take the American people to be? Besides, there was no claim of hazy memory just 2-3 days ago when people were being less than truthful in sworn testimony in an attempt at damage control. The lesson from the CIA leak case it that it works to throw up a fall guy, in this case Harriet Miers. But thanks to Josh Marshall and others it hasn’t worked this time.
My hazy memory says at the time the details on this operation got started Bush was on the stump talking about how he earned political capital from the 2004 election and that he would be spending some of that capital soon. Now we know what he was talking about when he made that declaration.
March 16th, 2007 at 2:07 pm# 79
March 16th, 2007 at 2:10 pmand bob you didn’t even curse ,I’m awed .
Bob sez:
Actually, Bob, I’ve been mentioning it at the top of my lungs ever since the firings started.
March 16th, 2007 at 2:10 pmI will “lobby” who I want, big papa, but I can tell you 100% truthfully I do not hate liberals.
P.S. freeman — thanks for the support. I’m too old to be bothered by curse words, so don’t worry about that. Is there some specific question you have that I haven’t answered?
March 16th, 2007 at 2:15 pmHow you can still support theis treasonous administration?
March 16th, 2007 at 2:18 pmPatrick 1 had sex with Harriet Meirs’ Oval Office.
March 16th, 2007 at 2:21 pmDubya is never responsible for anything.
Poppy has always bailed him out…
March 16th, 2007 at 2:22 pmAn The unified executive is the greatest threat democracy has face in this country.The president has made outright lies and been caught after the fact,on national TV repeatedly.Attacked and caused the deaths of 650 000 people and used forgeries and fabrications to sell that war .
March 16th, 2007 at 2:23 pmDon’t you like the constitution Jake ,the founding fathers were smart guys ,they didn’t want a king or a dictator.
THE PRICE OF FREEDOM IS ETERNAL VIGILANCE !
Good post, Bob
It’s way too easy to get ‘Trollifried’ in here. I’m guilty of the same.
Being passionate doesn’t preclude being civil. You are what you eat, but you are also what you speak.
Patrick, Jake, JMH, Daryll, Firehead and other assorted trollops, have a great weekend.
See you on C-Span!
March 16th, 2007 at 2:24 pm# 93 INCREDIBLE DID YOU THINK OF THAT BY YOURSELF OR DID YOU HAVE HELP.pATRICK MAYBE ?
March 16th, 2007 at 2:25 pmFor more on the Rove connection and the latest news, hearings, legal filings and other essential documents on the Bush DOJ prosecutor firings, see:
“The U.S. Attorney Scandal Documents.”
For more on why Alberto Gonzales’s own firing offenses go well beyond politically motivated sackings of U.S. attorneys, see:
March 16th, 2007 at 2:27 pm“The Top 10 Reasons Gonzales Must Go.”
Comment by freeman #84
…for the inbred right wing TREASONOUS Bushites’…
…intellectual dishonesty…
…moral turpitude…
…aiding and abetting mass murder…
…idol worship…
…TREASON…
…aiding and abetting war profiteering and corruption…
…racism, homophobia, misogyny, bigotry…
…bearing false witness…
…undermining the Constitution and eroding the Core Democratic Principles of this nation for which millions have died…
…I’d say a little cursing was the LEAST we “loonie lefty” Liberal Progressives could do…
…to voice our outrage and disappointment…
March 16th, 2007 at 2:28 pmAnything IS possible…including IMPEACHMENT!!!
March 16th, 2007 at 2:28 pm
#99 big daddy ,if I thought it would help I would use it endlessly but I honestly believe it is BAD for the cause .Salient facts are more powerful that nasty sexual innuendo and attention to a troll whose only here to be a fool and distract you.
March 16th, 2007 at 2:37 pmPeople actually read these blogs and curses are what people usually use when they’ve run out of words !
Focus man and shoot to kill !
Lies upon lies upon lies! Jesus, will this ever end???
March 16th, 2007 at 2:45 pmPOPS
March 16th, 2007 at 2:45 pmthink of the blog site as a fine automobile , that shit just gets stuck in the carburetor and slows us down ,I’m not against a little profanity ,I’m hardly a puritan ,but it has become so prevalent that I honestly wonder if V V grew from uranus is actually a troll and in either case I believe she should be banned from posting here unless she can clean up the obscenities .
Of course Bush can’t remember… alcohol and cocaine destroy brain cells and he has lost more than his share of brain cells. Boy Bush seems to be having constant blackouts during his tenure as Decider in Chief.
March 16th, 2007 at 3:54 pmBeing president would be so much easier without that “goddamn piece of paper”, you know, the one the troops are dying for… the sacrifice is worth it…
March 16th, 2007 at 4:02 pmDubya’s going for the “out of the loop”/”lost in the ozone” defence…..
Twenty-fifth Amendment, here we come….
Cheers,
March 16th, 2007 at 5:19 pmCHIMPya HAD BETTER HOPE HE HAS A HAZY MEMORY AND AN INABILITY TO RECOLLECT WHEN THE HANGMEN COME FOR HIM AND Cheney and the REST of Bushland Uber Allies–AT LEAST HE WONT KNOW WHY HE’S BEING HANGED BY HIS MISERABLE NECK UNTIL HE’S DEAD, DEAD, DEAD!!!!!
March 17th, 2007 at 12:53 am[…] UPDATE: II: Snow last week on the possibility of Bush’s involvement: “Anything’s possible.” […]
March 21st, 2007 at 2:08 pm