Comments on: 58: http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/ Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:48:36 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Young Girls Youngest Boys Gallery Young Girls Naked http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-4828418 Young Girls Youngest Boys Gallery Young Girls Naked Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:25:55 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-4828418 <strong>Young Girls Youngest Boys Gallery Young Girls Naked</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Young Girls Youngest Boys Gallery Young Girls Naked

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: KELP http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-4337504 KELP Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:46:10 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-4337504 <strong>KELP</strong> I Googled for something completely different, but found your page?and have to say thanks. nice read? KELP

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page?and have to say thanks. nice read?

]]> By: MediaChannel.org http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2714904 MediaChannel.org Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:25:25 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2714904 [...] MEDIA: THE U.S. ATTORNEY PURGE IS OVERBLOWN: In mid-January, as early details of the administration’s purge of U.S. attorneys began to trickle out, Time magazine reporter Jay Carney was already convinced the story was a dud. “[I]n this case some liberals are seeing broad partisan conspiracies where none likely exist,” he wrote. To his credit, two months later, Carney acknowledged he was wrong. But many senior journalists continue to parrot this line, despite the serious wrongdoings and potential illegalities that have since been exposed. This past weekend, CBS national political correspondent Gloria Borger declared that members of Congress pursuing the attorney scandal merely “want to change the subject. … They don’t want to talk about how they’re doing on the war in Iraq.” MSNBC’s Chris Matthews agreed. “They divide over the war and fund-raising, but this makes it simple. It’s good for fund-raising.” A March 22 Washington Post editorial stated that e-mails released by the Justice Department “for the most part suggest nothing nefarious in the dismissal process.” (As Media Matters noted, “[W]hile the editorial referred to the ‘e-mails that the administration has released,’ it made no mention of the entire category of communications that the White House has said will not be released.”) Roll Call executive editor Mort Kondracke claimed last week that there’s “not a shred of evidence” that “there was a nefarious reason involved” in the firings. Weekly Standard executive editor Fred Barnes agreed: “I’m still waiting to see some evidence of illegality or wrongdoing.” Again, the American public is far ahead of the establishment media. Fully 58 percent, including 45 percent of Republicans, “say the ouster of the federal prosecutors was driven by political concerns.” [...] [...] MEDIA: THE U.S. ATTORNEY PURGE IS OVERBLOWN: In mid-January, as early details of the administration’s purge of U.S. attorneys began to trickle out, Time magazine reporter Jay Carney was already convinced the story was a dud. “[I]n this case some liberals are seeing broad partisan conspiracies where none likely exist,” he wrote. To his credit, two months later, Carney acknowledged he was wrong. But many senior journalists continue to parrot this line, despite the serious wrongdoings and potential illegalities that have since been exposed. This past weekend, CBS national political correspondent Gloria Borger declared that members of Congress pursuing the attorney scandal merely “want to change the subject. … They don’t want to talk about how they’re doing on the war in Iraq.” MSNBC’s Chris Matthews agreed. “They divide over the war and fund-raising, but this makes it simple. It’s good for fund-raising.” A March 22 Washington Post editorial stated that e-mails released by the Justice Department “for the most part suggest nothing nefarious in the dismissal process.” (As Media Matters noted, “[W]hile the editorial referred to the ‘e-mails that the administration has released,’ it made no mention of the entire category of communications that the White House has said will not be released.”) Roll Call executive editor Mort Kondracke claimed last week that there’s “not a shred of evidence” that “there was a nefarious reason involved” in the firings. Weekly Standard executive editor Fred Barnes agreed: “I’m still waiting to see some evidence of illegality or wrongdoing.” Again, the American public is far ahead of the establishment media. Fully 58 percent, including 45 percent of Republicans, “say the ouster of the federal prosecutors was driven by political concerns.” [...]

]]> By: MediaChannel.org http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2714905 MediaChannel.org Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:25:25 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2714905 [...] MEDIA: THE U.S. ATTORNEY PURGE IS OVERBLOWN: In mid-January, as early details of the administration’s purge of U.S. attorneys began to trickle out, Time magazine reporter Jay Carney was already convinced the story was a dud. “[I]n this case some liberals are seeing broad partisan conspiracies where none likely exist,” he wrote. To his credit, two months later, Carney acknowledged he was wrong. But many senior journalists continue to parrot this line, despite the serious wrongdoings and potential illegalities that have since been exposed. This past weekend, CBS national political correspondent Gloria Borger declared that members of Congress pursuing the attorney scandal merely “want to change the subject. … They don’t want to talk about how they’re doing on the war in Iraq.” MSNBC’s Chris Matthews agreed. “They divide over the war and fund-raising, but this makes it simple. It’s good for fund-raising.” A March 22 Washington Post editorial stated that e-mails released by the Justice Department “for the most part suggest nothing nefarious in the dismissal process.” (As Media Matters noted, “[W]hile the editorial referred to the ‘e-mails that the administration has released,’ it made no mention of the entire category of communications that the White House has said will not be released.”) Roll Call executive editor Mort Kondracke claimed last week that there’s “not a shred of evidence” that “there was a nefarious reason involved” in the firings. Weekly Standard executive editor Fred Barnes agreed: “I’m still waiting to see some evidence of illegality or wrongdoing.” Again, the American public is far ahead of the establishment media. Fully 58 percent, including 45 percent of Republicans, “say the ouster of the federal prosecutors was driven by political concerns.” [...] [...] MEDIA: THE U.S. ATTORNEY PURGE IS OVERBLOWN: In mid-January, as early details of the administration’s purge of U.S. attorneys began to trickle out, Time magazine reporter Jay Carney was already convinced the story was a dud. “[I]n this case some liberals are seeing broad partisan conspiracies where none likely exist,” he wrote. To his credit, two months later, Carney acknowledged he was wrong. But many senior journalists continue to parrot this line, despite the serious wrongdoings and potential illegalities that have since been exposed. This past weekend, CBS national political correspondent Gloria Borger declared that members of Congress pursuing the attorney scandal merely “want to change the subject. … They don’t want to talk about how they’re doing on the war in Iraq.” MSNBC’s Chris Matthews agreed. “They divide over the war and fund-raising, but this makes it simple. It’s good for fund-raising.” A March 22 Washington Post editorial stated that e-mails released by the Justice Department “for the most part suggest nothing nefarious in the dismissal process.” (As Media Matters noted, “[W]hile the editorial referred to the ‘e-mails that the administration has released,’ it made no mention of the entire category of communications that the White House has said will not be released.”) Roll Call executive editor Mort Kondracke claimed last week that there’s “not a shred of evidence” that “there was a nefarious reason involved” in the firings. Weekly Standard executive editor Fred Barnes agreed: “I’m still waiting to see some evidence of illegality or wrongdoing.” Again, the American public is far ahead of the establishment media. Fully 58 percent, including 45 percent of Republicans, “say the ouster of the federal prosecutors was driven by political concerns.” [...]

]]> By: ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2296992 ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus Sun, 18 Mar 2007 05:34:55 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2296992 <em>Is anyone questioning whether purging US attorney’s is politically based? When hasn’t it been based on politics? Comment by Roger_Roger — March 18, 2007 @ 12:17 am</em> Actually many of your CON friends are denying it was for "political reasons", including valiant venus. I suggest you scroll up, and find her st*pid comments. So then your question just shows what an ignorant moron you are. <em>Most president fire all attorneys when they start for no reason.Comment by Roger_Roger — March 18, 2007 @ 12:17 am</em> Yeah, like they *fire* all Ambassadors for no reason? You're an idiot. <em>That is politically motived as well since it wasn’t for job performance. My guess is this isn’t a surpirse to anyone other then the congress members faking suprise. Comment by Roger_Roger — March 18, 2007 @ 12:17 am</em> And the GOP fools in your party that denied it wasn't for political reason - including the whitehouse spokesmen! Are you saying that the GOP are all liars? Then again, you lie so much, why would a lying fool like you care about liars - it's just politics right? You're a fcuking idiot Roger, pull your sh*t for brains head out of your *ss. Is anyone questioning whether purging US attorney’s is politically based? When hasn’t it been based on politics? Comment by Roger_Roger — March 18, 2007 @ 12:17 am

Actually many of your CON friends are denying it was for “political reasons”, including valiant venus. I suggest you scroll up, and find her st*pid comments. So then your question just shows what an ignorant moron you are.

Most president fire all attorneys when they start for no reason.Comment by Roger_Roger — March 18, 2007 @ 12:17 am

Yeah, like they *fire* all Ambassadors for no reason? You’re an idiot.

That is politically motived as well since it wasn’t for job performance. My guess is this isn’t a surpirse to anyone other then the congress members faking suprise. Comment by Roger_Roger — March 18, 2007 @ 12:17 am

And the GOP fools in your party that denied it wasn’t for political reason – including the whitehouse spokesmen! Are you saying that the GOP are all liars? Then again, you lie so much, why would a lying fool like you care about liars – it’s just politics right?

You’re a fcuking idiot Roger, pull your sh*t for brains head out of your *ss.

]]> By: Roger_Roger http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2294487 Roger_Roger Sun, 18 Mar 2007 04:17:40 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2294487 Is anyone questioning whether purging US attorney's is politically based? When hasn't it been based on politics? Most president fire all attorneys when they start for no reason. That is politically motived as well since it wasn't for job performance. My guess is this isn't a surpirse to anyone other then the congress members faking suprise. Is anyone questioning whether purging US attorney’s is politically based? When hasn’t it been based on politics? Most president fire all attorneys when they start for no reason. That is politically motived as well since it wasn’t for job performance. My guess is this isn’t a surpirse to anyone other then the congress members faking suprise.

]]> By: WaltTheMan http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2288539 WaltTheMan Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:51:29 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2288539 Jake just entered an IQ contest, he almost got a 1. Firehead was close behind. Jake just entered an IQ contest, he almost got a 1. Firehead was close behind.

]]> By: Raymond Funamoto http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2279502 Raymond Funamoto Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:59:38 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2279502 DON'T YOU LOVE HOW THE TROLLS LIKE TO DIG UP THE PAST LIKE Carter, Clinton, etc. AND BLAME PAST ADMINISTRATIONS FOR THEIR CIRRENT PROBLEMS? HELLO! HELLO! HELLO! ANY OF YOU repugnant-repub rightwingnut crank fudge-pachyderms AWAKE UP THERE? HELLO! HELLO! HELLO! WE ARE CURRENTLY IN THE CHIMPya W. Bush administration, WHO HAS NOBODY BUT ITSELF AND YOU TROLLS WHO SUPPORT IT, TO BLAME FOR YOUR IDIOCY, BOMBASTIC IMBECILITY AND MISFORTUNES--GO AND KICK YOURSELVES ALL IN THE ASS AND HIT YOUR MISERABLE FAT HEADS AGAINST A GRANITE WALL AND SPLASH YA SHIT-FOR-BRAINS AGAINST THAT WALL, FOOLS!!!! DON'T YA F*CKING BLAME OTHERS OR THE OTHER PARTY FOR YA OWN F*CK-UPS, MISERABLE PIECES OF HYENA-SHIT!!!!! AND DON'T FORGET TO TAKE Gonzo the CLOWN OUT WITH THE TRASH--WHERE BOTH HE AND YA BELONG!!!!! DON’T YOU LOVE HOW THE TROLLS LIKE TO DIG UP THE PAST LIKE Carter, Clinton, etc. AND BLAME PAST ADMINISTRATIONS FOR THEIR CIRRENT PROBLEMS? HELLO! HELLO! HELLO! ANY OF YOU repugnant-repub rightwingnut crank fudge-pachyderms AWAKE UP THERE? HELLO! HELLO! HELLO! WE ARE CURRENTLY IN THE CHIMPya W. Bush administration, WHO HAS NOBODY BUT ITSELF AND YOU TROLLS WHO SUPPORT IT, TO BLAME FOR YOUR IDIOCY, BOMBASTIC IMBECILITY AND MISFORTUNES–GO AND KICK YOURSELVES ALL IN THE ASS AND HIT YOUR MISERABLE FAT HEADS AGAINST A GRANITE WALL AND SPLASH YA SHIT-FOR-BRAINS AGAINST THAT WALL, FOOLS!!!! DON’T YA F*CKING BLAME OTHERS OR THE OTHER PARTY FOR YA OWN F*CK-UPS, MISERABLE PIECES OF HYENA-SHIT!!!!! AND DON’T FORGET TO TAKE Gonzo the CLOWN OUT WITH THE TRASH–WHERE BOTH HE AND YA BELONG!!!!!

]]> By: WaltTheMan http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2279067 WaltTheMan Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:50:11 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2279067 #61 - Marie, I paid a detective bureau to trace him down. They must have come up with the <strong>right stuff</strong>! Since Jake has yet to dispute the info, I figure that it was a well-invested $19.95. #61 – Marie,
I paid a detective bureau to trace him down. They must have come up with the right stuff! Since Jake has yet to dispute the info, I figure that it was a well-invested $19.95.

]]> By: Marie http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2278378 Marie Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:34:23 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2278378 Walt, that is pretty descriptive!! LOL Walt, that is pretty descriptive!! LOL

]]> By: Gregor Samsa http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2276734 Gregor Samsa Sat, 17 Mar 2007 18:57:33 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2276734 <i>can ANY U.S. Attorney can EVER be fired again? Comment by Jake — March 17, 2007 @ 11:13 am</i> I posted this comment in another thread, but I think it's worth repeating: Our new troll Jake is hell-bent on repeating this talking point. The firing of eight federal attorneys by a president -his own appointees and half-way through his second term- is unprecedented. This is a fact that will not change, regardless of how often the Bush cultists deny it. can ANY U.S. Attorney can EVER be fired again?
Comment by Jake — March 17, 2007 @ 11:13 am

I posted this comment in another thread, but I think it’s worth repeating:

Our new troll Jake is hell-bent on repeating this talking point.

The firing of eight federal attorneys by a president -his own appointees and half-way through his second term- is unprecedented. This is a fact that will not change, regardless of how often the Bush cultists deny it.

]]> By: WaltTheMan http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2276386 WaltTheMan Sat, 17 Mar 2007 18:49:00 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2276386 #57 - Marie, Jake, hands down: Jake’s career is what made him what he is today. He worked as a crash dummy for the NASA Rocket Sled program. After each run they would scrape his brains off of the base of the sled into a bucket, turn him upside down, put a funnel into each nostril and pour them back in. He still sloshes when he nods or shakes his head. Every once in a while, the air relief valve at the back of his head malfunctions and a little grey matter drips out. Of recent, no one notices any difference when that occurs. #57 – Marie,

Jake, hands down:

Jake’s career is what made him what he is today.

He worked as a crash dummy for the NASA Rocket Sled program.

After each run they would scrape his brains off of the base of the sled into a bucket, turn him upside down, put a funnel into each nostril and pour them back in.

He still sloshes when he nods or shakes his head.

Every once in a while, the air relief valve at the back of his head malfunctions and a little grey matter drips out. Of recent, no one notices any difference when that occurs.

]]> By: Smack http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2273619 Smack Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:49:25 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2273619 Please give us an IGNORE button here. Sheesh! i'm so tired of the Trolls hijacking the threads. Please give us an IGNORE button here. Sheesh! i’m so tired of the Trolls hijacking the threads.

]]> By: Marie http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2273138 Marie Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:42:37 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2273138 Hmm, I can't decide. Which one? Hmm. Who is more stupid - Jake or Firehead? Hmm, I can’t decide. Which one? Hmm.
Who is more stupid – Jake or Firehead?

]]> By: Marie http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2272822 Marie Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:37:51 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2272822 Did everyone notice the comment that Sampson has not left the White House yet - in fact, Gonzo has a back-up position ready for him. He may have to change his plans now that the word is out, but until yesterday, that was the plan. Did everyone notice the comment that Sampson has not left the White House yet – in fact, Gonzo has a back-up position ready for him. He may have to change his plans now that the word is out, but until yesterday, that was the plan.

]]> By: katy http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2271928 katy Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:26:17 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2271928 Happy St. Patrick's Day! to all... sharon - i must confess - i WAS surprised that you are irish! not sure why... do you suppose i had stereotypical visions of witches in my head?... never the "bad witch", dear... but i didn't picture a "colleen" either! i'm guessing that zooey has plenty of the irish blood in her veins also! my maternal grandfather was irish... while i have only hints of red in my hair, my mom and daughter have "auburn" hair... and you know what they way about freckles: a face without freckles, is like a night without stars... :-) Happy St. Patrick’s Day! to all…

sharon – i must confess – i WAS surprised that you are irish!
not sure why… do you suppose i had stereotypical visions of witches in my head?… never the “bad witch”, dear… but i didn’t picture a “colleen” either!

i’m guessing that zooey has plenty of the irish blood in her veins also!

my maternal grandfather was irish… while i have only hints of red in my hair, my mom and daughter have “auburn” hair…

and you know what they way about freckles:

a face without freckles, is like a night without stars…
:-)

]]> By: Sharon http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2271419 Sharon Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:15:23 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2271419 I will be out of here soon as well, Lady Z...Yep! birth given name Riley..Having trouble finding much about my root's before their landing in Kentucky 5 generation's ago though.. Raven, I love salmon but all the other can't comment on, never have liked cavier so some of that stuff is suspect...Happy day to you as well. Angry One, thank you for all your link's...Blessings all.. I will be out of here soon as well, Lady Z…Yep! birth given name Riley..Having trouble finding much about my root’s before their landing in Kentucky 5 generation’s ago though..

Raven, I love salmon but all the other can’t comment on, never have liked cavier so some of that stuff is suspect…Happy day to you as well.

Angry One, thank you for all your link’s…Blessings all..

]]> By: Bluedog49 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2271253 Bluedog49 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:11:58 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2271253 The troops in Iraq dying because of you libs and because Bush can’t concentrate on victory say thanks. Comment by firehead — March 17, 2007 @ 11:43 am There it is, folks. The "culture of accountability" conservatives said they were bringing to D.C. They're in charge of the Executive branch and ran the legislative branch for 12 years before a few months ago. They controll a broad swath of the Judiciary and much of the mainstream media. They start a war, they are too incompetent to prosecute it correctly, the world goes to hell, and..... THEY BLAME LIBERALS???!!! Simply pathetic. The troops in Iraq dying because of you libs and because Bush can’t concentrate on victory say thanks.

Comment by firehead — March 17, 2007 @ 11:43 am

There it is, folks. The “culture of accountability” conservatives said they were bringing to D.C. They’re in charge of the Executive branch and ran the legislative branch for 12 years before a few months ago. They controll a broad swath of the Judiciary and much of the mainstream media. They start a war, they are too incompetent to prosecute it correctly, the world goes to hell, and….. THEY BLAME LIBERALS???!!! Simply pathetic.

]]> By: Bruce Gorton http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2271139 Bruce Gorton Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:08:53 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2271139 Firehead Maybe it has something to do with the fact that the guys who are actually actively betraying America, and all its stands for, are you chaps. You see, back when this whole Iraq thing started, us liberals? We were busy saying it was a bad idea. We came up with lots and lots of good arguments as to why it was a bad idea, and we even went so far as to show that the arguments in favour of invading Iraq were, total crap. And what do you know? We were proven <strong>right. </strong> We were proven so beyond a bloody doubt right that no amount of propaganda, no amount of traitor talk, and no amount of jingoism is going to stop the fact that ultimately, we were right and you were wrong. And this isn't the only argument where we are getting proved right. On every area where we have argued against your boys in charge, we have been proven right. It is quite startling. Even the economy, which is doing so well that 2.2 million Americans can now look forward to losing their homes, we were right and you were wrong. We were proven right on torture We were proven right on phone taps. We were proven right on taxes. We were proven right on FEMA. We were proven right on the levies in NO, and we were proven right on the pork projects in Alaska. We were proven right on Republican corruption. (K Street anyone?) We were proven right on Republican hypocrisy. (Hagel anyone?) We were proven right on Republican stupidity. (Delay's fans anyone?) We were proven right over and over and over and over again on every single flipping thing which we knew damn well was going to be a balls up and you wankers can't get over it, so you call us traitors because we warned you that this was going to hurt America, and you went ahead, did it anyway and now want to duck your responsibility for hurting and betraying America. Grow some balls and take some responsibility Republican. Firehead

Maybe it has something to do with the fact that the guys who are actually actively betraying America, and all its stands for, are you chaps.

You see, back when this whole Iraq thing started, us liberals? We were busy saying it was a bad idea. We came up with lots and lots of good arguments as to why it was a bad idea, and we even went so far as to show that the arguments in favour of invading Iraq were, total crap.

And what do you know? We were proven right. We were proven so beyond a bloody doubt right that no amount of propaganda, no amount of traitor talk, and no amount of jingoism is going to stop the fact that ultimately, we were right and you were wrong.

And this isn’t the only argument where we are getting proved right.

On every area where we have argued against your boys in charge, we have been proven right. It is quite startling.

Even the economy, which is doing so well that 2.2 million Americans can now look forward to losing their homes, we were right and you were wrong.

We were proven right on torture

We were proven right on phone taps.

We were proven right on taxes.

We were proven right on FEMA.

We were proven right on the levies in NO, and we were proven right on the pork projects in Alaska.

We were proven right on Republican corruption. (K Street anyone?)

We were proven right on Republican hypocrisy. (Hagel anyone?)

We were proven right on Republican stupidity. (Delay’s fans anyone?)

We were proven right over and over and over and over again on every single flipping thing which we knew damn well was going to be a balls up and you wankers can’t get over it, so you call us traitors because we warned you that this was going to hurt America, and you went ahead, did it anyway and now want to duck your responsibility for hurting and betraying America.

Grow some balls and take some responsibility Republican.

]]> By: Angry One http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/comment-page-2/#comment-2270675 Angry One Sat, 17 Mar 2007 16:58:29 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/17/58-3/#comment-2270675 For the latest news, hearings, legal filings and other essential documents on the Bush DOJ prosecutor firings, see: <b><a href="http://www.perrspectives.com/resources/documents.htm#prosecutors" rel="nofollow">"The U.S. Attorney Scandal Documents."</a></b> For the latest news, hearings, legal filings and other essential documents on the Bush DOJ prosecutor firings, see:
“The U.S. Attorney Scandal Documents.”

]]>