I hope you don’t operate any heavy machinery.

Most of you people need to either grow up or move.

Otherwise wait for the next election to do something about it.

BTW – if the Fox News is so bad, why did they cover the Gathering of Eagles & Cindy Sheehans’s anti-war crowd last Saturday when noother outlet covered both?

Stop the killing by killing themselfes, 1.000.000 people died from the start of the invasion.
What about Prescot bush who founded Adolf Hitler in his war.
What about George Bush senior who was the bos of the CIA when Kennedy got killed. See video, the bodyguards are called off, who called them off?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DA0FxvJQn4

And now Bush junior, what did he do for the world with his insane war on terror, selfcreated and with one hand on the bible?

See the connections? I do. It’s a evil family with even more evil plans!

Mahatma stated,

There is no path to peace, peace is the path!

http://www.niburu.nl/showarticle.php?articleID=15954

You’re brainwashed, how can you say such things, start thinking and see what is unfolding under your very eyes! The 2 th world war started the same way, the same thinking and the same actions, then the judes were the victim, now the muslims are. Insane world with even insaner leaders and the World is still sleeping.

Watch this video! Can anyone explain both video’s, the one shown in the window and the other one from BBC who knew 20 minutes earlier that building 7 would collapse?

When we pull out, there will be much more bloodshed over there until the civil war is over…

What circle of hell is reserved for those who start / contribute to genocide?

Bush has saved the world from the Evil Axis – North Korea and Libbya were so scared they gave up their nukes. Iraq had to learn the hard way. Iran might too – doesn’t matter – they’re all the same -we’ll turn their country into a parkin lot.

Saddam’s former deputy hanged before dawn

MSNBC ^ | March 20, 2007
Saddam Hussein’s former deputy was hanged before dawn Tuesday, the fourth man to be executed in the killings of 148 Shiites following a 1982 assassination attempt against the former leader in the town of Dujail. Taha Yassin Ramadan, who was Saddam’s vice president when the regime was ousted, went to the gallows on the fourth anniversary of the start of the war in Iraq. Bassam al-Hassani, an adviser to Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, said the execution went smoothly, although Ramadan appeared frightened and recited the two shahadahs — a declaration of faith repeated by Muslims — “There is no God…

44% THINK THINGS ARE WORSE after U.S. invasion and regime change: “I am talking about Europe. A Financial Times-Harris poll found great discontent with the European Union, which was an outgrowth of the Common Market, which was set up at the behest of the American government as a means of getting the nations of Old Europe to get along and quit having wars every generation or so.”

There’s lots more here.

Read on…

In the face of all this certainty, it seems counter-intuitive to suggest that even giving the levels of violence in the capital, Saddam’s Iraq was not a haven of tolerance for gays and religious minorities, nor was it a model of progressive care for women and children. It was not a utopia of economic opportunity and prosperity. And those who so loudly and self-righteously trumpet their constitutionally-mandated freedoms here in the US might reflect that “shutting up” is a pretty high price to pay, even to live in the paradise that was Saddam’s Iraq.

Of course, that’s just my opinion. Everyone has an opinion. But maybe we should ask the Iraqis?

Luckily for us, an independent British polling company did just that. They deployed 400 employees to interview 5000 Iraqis on a range of subjects. Some of the results are not surprising, given what we see on the news everyday. Iraq is a violent place, and murder and kidnapping are a huge concern for many. But, even so, the survey came back with some other results that seem to fly in the face of the “Iraq-was-better-under-Saddam” crowd:

But 49 per cent of those questioned preferred life under Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to living under Saddam, while 26 per cent said things were better in Saddam’s era, 16 per cent said they were as bad as each other and the rest did not know or refused to answer.

Not surprisingly, the divisions in Iraqi society were reflected in the statistics: Sunnis were more likely to back the previous Ba’ath Party regime (51 per cent) while the Shi’ites (66 per cent) preferred the Maliki Government.

Mr Maliki, who gets much of his support from hardline Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi army, has begun to address criticism that his Government favours the Shi’ites, going out of his way to be seen with Sunni tribal leaders.

The poll shows a marked increase in support for Mr Maliki. A survey conducted by ORB in September found only 29 per cent of Iraqis had a favourable opinion of the Prime Minister.

A surprise was that only 27 per cent believed they were caught up in a civil war. Again, that number divided along religious lines, with 41 per cent of Sunnis believing Iraq was in civil war, while 15 per cent of Shi’ites thought things were that bad.

That is a surprise. But we should probably take note, because with all due respect to Matt Lauer, wouldn’t the Iraqis know better than he if they were in a civil war? I wonder of some Iraqis participating in earlier polls over there that fueled Saddam-nostalgia over here reflexively shaded their answers in favor of a violent tyrant who might yet return to power, especially if the Americans were to lose heart and leave. After all, Saddam survivors might feel that you never know for sure who’s asking, or what they’re really trying to find out. Now that Saddam is truly gone–and as gruesome as those photographs were, they do demonstrate the finality of his execution–a post-Saddam Iraq may be a more conceivable reality. Or perhaps it’s even more simple, and the majority of Iraqis are realizing that the difficult battle waged over the last year is emerging as a success, not a failure. It follows that their lives can be better now. The future may well be bright–why waste time on a civil war?

Of course, if you really want to, you can still tease a negative headline out of this data, as Susan Page of USAToday demonstrates with “Poll: Most Iraqis live in fear of violence 4 years after invasion.” But as the train that is the new Iraq starts to pull out of the station, Ms. Page and her defeatist cohorts might find themselves, like the Iraqis who would prefer Saddam, in a dwindling minority.

news reports 2 days ago saying 1 million have died in Iraq as a direct result of american occupation

If Kofi Annan the Un secretary general says the Iraq war was illegal I would prefer to beleive him than any misinterperatation of the Un on behalf of the American Admin

1) The IRaq War was completly legal. After the end of the Gulf War I in 1990 neither the USA nor the UN signed a peace treaty with Iraq. A truce was signed, very, very, very different than a peace treaty. Just like N. Korea and S. Korea have a truce and not a peace treaty. We all know that the Korean War has never officially and legally ended. that is the same thing that happened in 1990.

2)The truce that Iraq did sign had stipulations in it. Among many things it called on Iraq to end human right abuses, you know the systematic and purposedly killing of hundreds of thousands of its citizens. Stop researching and building WMDs. Stop researching and building missles that could reach Europe and Israel, etc, etc, etc. Now, for the sake of argument let us say that there were no WMDs, right? But he did have long range missles that were forbiden under the UN truce, he mass murdered hundreds of thousands of his people. These two things alone are a clear violation of the truce signed by Iraq in 1990, thus making the war completly legal.

Sad that you can’t see the real crimes of Saddam Hussein and his regime, the mass mudering of millions. You seem to forget that you guys on the left supported Clinton when he went into Kosovo for Serbia’s gross violations of human rights there. You seem to forget that Liberals today are calling on Bush and his administration to take action against the government of Darfur since diplomacy failed.

so you tell me, do you think that Iraqis are not human beings? do you think that only people from Kosovo and Darfur and human enough for the USA to intervene and stop the mass killings from their governments?

why doesn’t thinkprogress.org bother to put up the biggest poll done in Iraq by a UK polling company that shows that 42% of Iraqis don’t believe their country is in a civil war, while 27% do.

why doesn’t it show the polls that say that most Iraqis don’t want the USA to leave yet?

obviously, it would be too much to ask for a ultra-liberal organization like thinkprogress.org to show both side of the coins. how truly and honestly sad.

The only real support for the Government are young immature thugs running round shouting Nuke Iraq thats exactly how low this goverment support has stooped too

next it shows a car with young thugs driving past shouting at war protestors “Nuke Iraq”

This is the support for the Goverment young Thugs

“that explains the low levels goverments have to go to get support every”