I appreciate your effort and the quality of the information you provide. Hopefully you can find the time to visit my site.

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

Very interesting post. A little bit confusing, but still ok. do you know what is the first? i`ve the new album at my blog

Bush personally blocked an investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility in the Justice Department — the office responsible for investigating allegations of misconduct involving Department attorneys — which repeatedly attempted to investigate whether DOJ lawyers acted improperly concerning their role in the President’s warrantless eavesdropping program, but finally stopped their investigation because the President refused to give them the security clearances they needed to conduct the investigation.

Bush had no problem, however, granting security clearances, some to civilians, when he wanted to check into the leak of the NSA warrantless wiretapping program.

But see, you idiots don’t see a problem with this. That, or you are so far up Bush and the Republicans as*es that you don’t WANT to see a problem. Archie Bunkers…each and every one of you.

If Bush will personally block something like this, it’s not too much of a stretch of the imagination to conclude he’ll take any action to prevent investigation of any wrongdoing by his administration or any of his cronies.

Comment by Roger_Roger — March 20, 2007 @ 2:31 pm

Roger_Roger supports obstruction of justice! No surprise there.

No president has the right to obstruct justice.

Tell us, oh wise one, what the “problem with Carol Lam” was that Sampson was referring to in the e-mail TP posted yesterday. Any clue?

And tell us, Roger, whether Carol’s replacement took up where she left off. Hell, why don’t you tell us if any of the 8 replacements continuted any investigations that were planned or under way.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/ history/ life/ vpresidence.html#
The only piece of equipment in that office that has not belongedto the government since the early 1900’s is the $140,000 telephone.

That’s classic for you *CONS*, you always think there’s a *big-difference* when you’re the criminal. Hypocrite, fool, idiot!

Do you think my feelings are hurt by the children posting that sort of junk?

Comment by Roger_Roger — March 20, 2007 @ 3:31 pm

Your post was going along so well and had merit until you did what you said you were against, which is name calling. Either you do it or you don’t do it.

In my book, there is no difference between calling somebody a child or calling them a d!ckhead. It is just a different word.

So, either call names or don’t call names. Make up your mind.

Both of these posts are worthless wastes of time. At least respond with an idea or viewpoint based on the topic. While the first post was obviously from either a complete idiot or an unsupervised child, your post just proves you need to get back on the meds. Stop posting for awhile, get some help, then come back and try to actually add something to the topic being discussed. Have a nice day.

Comment by Roger_Roger — March 20, 2007 @ 3:09 pm

Classic. Roger_Roger is having to put the smack dab on his groupie troll.

I am behind you 100% Roger_Roger. Your groupie is one of the strangest yet. It is one thing to attack the other side for things they have done. It is another thing altogether to state somebody is a Satanist or witch.

Really Jamie this is all sarcasm right. It’s all a put on isn’t it – it must be. I hope. Because otherwise you are really scary.

Comment by WaltTheMan — March 20, 2007 @ 3:10 pm”

Sure, but that would not help in his defense would it? I would love for him to do that…….

With the evidence available, that would absolutely seal his fate for jail.