Did Renzi probe lead to attorney firing?
By on Mar 21st, 2007 at 7:55 pm
Did Renzi probe lead to attorney firing?
“Last September, CREW named Rep. Rick Renzi (R-AZ) as one of the most corrupt members of Congress in our report, “Beyond DeLay.” Last October, the Associated Press reported that Renzi was under federal investigation for a land deal. In December, Paul Charlton, the U.S. Attorney in Arizona who was investigating Renzi, was fired. Speculation is growing about whether the Renzi investigation led to Charlton’s dismissal.” CREW has the details.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
More dirt…no wonder Bushie doesn’t want Rove and Miers to testify….they’re in it up to their eyeballs!
March 21st, 2007 at 8:00 pmIf you fire a prosecutor to keep him from investigating your friend, you have obstructed justice. It’s just that simple, Bush cultists.
March 21st, 2007 at 8:02 pmSo, BlueDog49 — if Clinton and Carter both fired a prosecutor to keep him from investigating their friends, they obstructed justice too?
March 21st, 2007 at 8:11 pmIf you fire a prosecutor to keep him from investigating your friend, you have obstructed justice. It’s just that simple, Bush cultists.
Comment by Bluedog49
But, but, you haven’t prooooooooooved anything. You just hate Bush and you’re making all this up.
Wah.
Besides, Clinton did it.
March 21st, 2007 at 8:11 pmAnother one! Damn, the hits just keep on coming…
March 21st, 2007 at 8:11 pmI smell the sweet springlike fragrance of impeachment…
ooh! i’m in this thread now!
this is amazing..not surprising, but amazing..
it’s a shame no one in the white house has gotten a blowjob(*other than by Jeff Gannon*) yet…
March 21st, 2007 at 8:12 pmlisten as far as i’m concerned they’re all a bunch of political leeches :)
and there’s a this point forward i believe a good chunk of society
has become politicized and i really don’t know how much corruption
occurs, i’m sure going to learn to discern what areas of society are
politicized and most likely either not or highly politicized and be very
careful whether to participate. who in their right mind would engage
forking over what they need to big pharma. Society has become politicized
often politicization breeds leeches/parasites and who in their right mind
wants to participate in a sector of society that has become infested with
corrupted parasites/leeches. There is a very good chance 5 – 10 years
from now, might not even know who the next president is… although i’m
interested what will come of pelosi/murtha give it a couple of years.
Yes sir ree, one of the coolest dudes in the universe just checking in don’t
March 21st, 2007 at 8:14 pmdo no mind alteraction and yup, just born one of the most heavenly awesome dudes…. just comes natural… that jimbo dude all right :)
FOCUS…FOCUS…
March 21st, 2007 at 8:17 pmJake, the more you repeat it, the funnier it gets!
I get the feeling you will be stuck in this particular rut for some time.
March 21st, 2007 at 8:17 pmHave fun, for the next year or two, my squiggly little indi buddy…
I’ll save you the trouble larry moe and curly (jake, patrick, flaco,)
What about sandy berger!-clinton did it too!-executive privilege!-you’re helping the terrorists!-perjury isn’t a REAL crime!-libs are bad!-repbulicans are good!-even the draftdodging,criminal,lying-cowardly,meth-snorting gay hooker boinking, pretend christian repbulicans!-Why?-start over!
March 21st, 2007 at 8:17 pmHey Wait! we just got another terrist to admit he killed all the dinosaurs! all we had to do is let ted haggart interrogate his kids!
March 21st, 2007 at 8:20 pmJake? Hello? Hello? This is the 21st century. Clinton and Carter were presidents in the 20th century. GET WITH THE BLOODY TIMES!
March 21st, 2007 at 8:23 pmHere in AZ we know all about it. Here’s Renzi getting some Katherine Harris, in the background.
I couldn’t watch more than the first minute. But anyone brave enough to see a bit of Mr. Renzi’s taste in women, well, go for it.
I couldn’t find the video of Renzi on 9/11. He is standing outside in DC when the Pentagon was hit. This was before he was in office. He
March 21st, 2007 at 8:23 pms wearing a wife-beater, and a mullet. Its precious, and YouTube didn’t have it.
Hey jake
if a republican commits a crime and the congress is republican, is it really a crime?
March 21st, 2007 at 8:25 pmIn one of our local little raggy papers, that I read, there is a “Renzi Watch” column, which keeps track of his votes. He’s a wanker.
March 21st, 2007 at 8:25 pmWhite House & Snowjob Tony: What do you get from a transcript?
The people’s answer: A paper trail – something we didn’t have which allowed you to steal two elections.
And I repeat: If the Truth is what Bush seeks, then why not transcript under oath? We all know the answer to that because it’s indictment by omission. No transcript/no proof.
Why trust an administration of liars. Their man under the Veep is in jail for lying under oath. Why would any american believe this president any longer. He lies. He lies and then he works to cover it up. What Bush knows and what we all know is that this attorney firing leads us to a charge against Bush directly of “OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE”. He’s going down for it and he knows it. He’s just trying bullying tactics with his deal making. He’ll be spinning real deals for his jail time soon.
March 21st, 2007 at 8:29 pmHere in AZ we know all about it. Here’s Renzi getting some Katherine Harris, in the background.
I couldn’t watch more than the first minute. But anyone brave enough to see a bit of Mr. Renzi’s taste in women, well, go for it.
Comment by ForTruth
Harris obviously thinks he’s a very witty and fascinating man. And she’s, what, 14?
March 21st, 2007 at 8:29 pmJust to make anyone feel better, his office gets vandalized pretty regularly. I live here in his district, and his office is in my city. It’s in the local paper and news a lot.
March 21st, 2007 at 8:30 pmThe Chimpy administration is in a real bind here…
They tried to fire attorneys that weren’t toeing the party line. By itself, that’s not so terrible, since the replacement attorneys, which would normally have to be confirmed by the Senate, would normally pick up whatever investigations the previous attorney left, as was the case with Clinton.
However, with the passage of that obscure PATRIOT Act provision, the administration saw how it could fire attorneys and replace them with blatant party operatives, who would not have to undergo Senate confirmation. This opened up marvelous new opportunities for corruption, and the administration moved to take advantage of these opportunities.
Unfortunately for the administration, word got out about the PATRIOT Act provision. If this had happened as few as ten years ago, Chimpy might have gotten away with it, but in this day and age, with information so readily available, it didn’t take long for everyone to sit up and take notice.
Just recently, the Senate approved a resolution to remove the offending passage from the PATRIOT Act by a stunning 94-2 margin. The House is expected to approve the resolution by a similar margin.
Now that the replacement attorneys will once again have to be approved by the Senate, there is really no reason for the dismissals. But to just invite them back now will confirm the suspicion that the administration intended to abuse the PATRIOT Act provision for personal gain. Therefore, the administration must stick to its original (ludicrous) cover story of ‘unsatisfactory performance’, which is unraveling by the second.
A real bind, indeed.
March 21st, 2007 at 8:31 pm#13 The illusionist, Katherine Harris, with her fake boobs and pancake makeup a mile thick….oh that fraud. Yes, she’s due to be making the investigation soon I’d suspect….she’s complicit in the stolen election of 2000 and Dukie Cunningham and Mitch Wade have been her “bedfellows”…. Someone needs to open an investigation into Katherine Harris soon.
March 21st, 2007 at 8:31 pmCharlton was also investigating this Republican:
Feds probe trip that Kolbe made with pages-
Updated: 1:55 p.m. ET Oct 13, 2006
March 21st, 2007 at 8:32 pmWASHINGTON – Federal prosecutors in Arizona have opened a preliminary investigation of a camping trip Congressman Jim Kolbe, R-Ariz., took that included two teenage congressional pages.
As NBC News first reported, Kolbe took a tour down the Grand Canyon in July 1996 with a group that included two 17-year-old males who had recently left the congressional page program
Ultimate Hookergate
(mad cow)
The Randy Cunningham “Hookergate” Scandal is not the first prostitution scandal involving close relatives of indicted defense contractor Brent Wilkes, The MadCowMorningNews has learned.
Brent Wilkes brother, Gregory Wilkes, managed the finances of The Wilkes Foundation, which was suspended by the State of California after failing to file financial statements for three years in a row.
When Greg Wilkes wasn’t busy failing to file required documents with the state on his brother’s charitable foundation, he was the Controller for an unfortunate “Bush Pioneer” named R.D. Hubbard, busted flying almost a dozen hookers by private jet in June of 2001 to a casino he owned to service men government documents have only identified as “48 wealthy guests.â€
Back in the ’80’s Hubbard was involved in a number of Michael Milken-financed “greenmail” takeover attempts, partnered with Midland, Texas oilmen Wagner and Brown Ltd.
March 21st, 2007 at 8:32 pmtrangely, in 2001 Wagner and Brown became the last known registered owner of the Lear jet which belonged to terror flight school owner Wally Hilliard until it was seized by DEA agents in Orlando who found 43 lbs. of heroin onboard.
“Yes sir ree, one of the coolest dudes in the universe just checking in don’t
do no mind alteraction and yup, just born one of the most heavenly awesome dudes…. just comes natural… that jimbo dude all right :)”
Jimbo, glad you like yourself! Are you by any chance my brother? You sure sound like him… do you live on Mt. Murphy?
March 21st, 2007 at 8:33 pmTripMaster Monkey (19),
I wouldn’t mind betting the 18 day email gap included references to the Patriot Act.
Something like, “We can get away with this using the Patriot Act.”
Imagine if that’s in the emails!
Martin Gifford.
March 21st, 2007 at 8:41 pmLiberal Kingpins Help Bush War Agenda
MoveOn.org, Pelosi, fake “progressive left” Neo-Cons in sheep’s clothing
Prison Planet | March 21, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson
Almost six months after the Democrats recaptured both Houses and political sleeping gas sent the “progressive” left off into dream world, establishment liberals like Nancy Pelosi and the MoveOn.org foundation continue to whore themselves in service of the Neo-Con war agenda and their Bush administration pimps.
While the media obsesses about the sideshow of the attorney firings “scandal,” preparations for a war with Iran and the continued feeding of U.S. troops into the Iraq meat grinder continues with the utter and total complicity of kingpin Democrats and their phony advocacy groups.
An organized campaign to marginalize anti-war Democrats in Congress and force through the $124 billion wartime spending bill was employed not by Republican Neo-Cons, but by Nancy Pelosi and the so-called anti-war “progressive” MoveOn.org foundation!
Congress will vote on the bill this Thursday but Democrats who want to see troops withdrawn from the Iraq quagmire have been completely abandoned by the leadership of their own “opposition” party, with Pelosi determined to introduce an almost identical war chest bill in the unlikely event of the original draft failing to pass.
MoveOn.org, a liberal advocacy group that preaches anti-war sentiment on its website, issued an endorsement for the war bill on Monday, aligning its 3.3 million members with Bush’s agenda to keep feeding U.S. troops, who now “want out,” into the imperial meat grinder. Anti-war Democrats told The Politico that they were being aggressively pressured and threatened with funding denials unless they supported the war bill.
MoveOn.org: Anti-war or sleeping gas steam valve for naive liberals?
The backlash against MoveOn.org is already brewing.
“MoveOn put out a dishonest poll that did not offer its members a real choice to end the war, and now the peace movement is lobbying activists to reform MoveOn or drop off its list,” said David Swanson, a board member of Progressive Democrats of America, said in an e-mail to The Politico. “I unsubscribed from MoveOn this morning.”
Why would MoveOn.org, a supposed liberal organization that opposes the war, pressure anti-war Democrats to vote for a bill that will ensure the war rolls on? Because they are nothing more than a bought and paid for front organization for the elite that pose as an independent advocacy group yet act as nothing more than a steam valve for anti-war sentiment that has now enveloped the vast majority of the body politic.
Meanwhile, presidential hopefuls and MoveOn.org members Edwards and Obama continue to apologetically prostrate themselves in front of the vampires of AIPAC and the Israeli lobby, humble, submissive, and dutiful in accepting their orders to hound Iran into accepting either total subjection or facing complete annihilation.
They are merely following the lead of the poster girl for the counterfeit “progressives,” Nancy Pelosi, who deliberately stripped the Iraq funding bill of a provision that would have required President Bush to seek congressional approval before launching any new war on Iran, a “disastrous misstep could haunt her and the Congress for years to come,” according to John Nichols of The Nation .
But far from a “misstep,” Pelosi’s green light for Bush to open up another front in the empire is later attributed to “pressure from lobbyists associated with neoconservative groups that want war with Iran and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).”
Pelosi’s duty to aid the Neo-Cons and Israel in further creaking open the gates of hell in the Middle East was made abundantly clear to her when, during a speech to AIPAC, she offered milquetoast criticism of the situation in Iraq and was met with a chorus of boos.
The Internet leader in activist media – Prison Planet.tv . Thousands of special reports, videos, MP3’s, interviews, conferences, speeches, events, documentary films, books and more – all for just 15 cents a day! Click here to subscribe! Find out the true story behind government sponsored terror, 7/7, Gladio and 9/11, get Terror Storm!
“Pelosi gets booed by the Israeli lobby, then runs back to the Hill and gives Bush a blank check for war on Iran, because that is what the lobby demands,” writes Pat Buchanan.
But Pelosi’s compromised runs deeper than the obligatory obedience to the demands of the Israeli lobby, for it was she who also issued the talking points after the mid-term election in immediately declaring impeachment of Bush to be “off the table,” a directive from party headquarters that was instantly parroted by Dean, Rangel and others.
Pelosi, MoveOn.org and their cheerleaders are nothing more than Neo-Cons in sheep’s clothing and they are complicit in every act of imperial bloodletting – past, present and future. So too are the self-proclaimed “progressive” blogs and media outlets who claim to be anti-war and yet, Cindy Sheehan aside, have offered nothing but simpering platitudes for Pelosi and other Democrat shills, failing to hold accountable these cretins who have done nothing to reverse Bush’s numerous assaults on the U.S. constitution and the perception of America in foreign lands.
One individual who isn’t buying the fraud is Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, whose remarks at the Pentagon last week sublimely underline the creeping connivance of Pelosi, MoveOn.org and their ilk.
“Voting for Complicity”
Cynthia McKinney
Remarks in front of the Pentagon
March 17, 2007
Well, it seems that George Bush and Democratic Leaders were right.
They confidently told us that not only would Democrats fund the surge, but that the Democrats would not stop action in Iran, too.
Now, we are not surprised when the unelected, illegitimate Administration of George Bush ignores us, but we are shocked that the Democratic majority in Congress chose war over us as we say Bring our troops home now!
The answer is clear: Our country has been hijacked.
What about a livable wage for America’s workers? What about the right of return for Katrina survivors? What about repealing the Patriot Act, the Secret Evidence Act, and the Military Tribunals Act? Why is impeachment “off the table”?
Our country is bankrupt yet this institution, the Pentagon, has “lost” 2.3 trillion dollars!
I want that money back . . .
For jobs . . . for health care . . . for education . . . for our veterans!
The Democrats have become so timid they won’t even repeal the Bush tax cuts as a strategy to deal with a bankrupt nation.
Seems the story is the same: more money for war, but we can’t feed the poor.
It’s hard to believe, but now the Democrats are full partners in George Bush’s wars.
And by funding his wars, the Democratic Congress is explicitly complicit.
Complicit in war crimes!
Complicit in torture!
Complicit in crimes against humanity!
Complicit in crimes against peace!
The FBI spied on us;
Condoleezza, Dick, and George lied to us.
In 1957, Dr. King observed that “Both political parties have betrayed the cause of justice.”
And so it must be repeated today.
Our beloved America is dividing again into two Americas. Our struggle is for nothing less than the soul of our country.
We want an America that is respected in the commonwealth of man; we want our values to shine like a beacon throughout the world.
As an American of conscience, I hereby declare my independence from every bomb dropped, every threat leveled, every civil liberties rollback, every child killed, every veteran maimed, every man tortured.
And I sadly declare my independence from the leaders who let it happen.
We will not stop. We will win. We will take our country back!
“TerrorStorm is something that should be seen by everyone, no matter what their stance/affiliation/political bent. ” – Rich Rosell, Digitally Obsessed UK
March 21st, 2007 at 8:47 pmGet TerrorStorm on DVD today
dude… all i’m doing is opening up the blinders and updating the political
propaganda learned during high school of all the public servants, because
of their hard work and rock solid integrity, god almighty appointed them to
serve to more rule, infest, and contaminate sectors of society.
and as stated what i conclude a good chunk of society we all know it as of
March 21st, 2007 at 8:48 pmtoday has become infested…. who in their right mind, like sheep, got the
point… in reality though we really do to a certain extent have the choice
to discern what’s still the truth compared to the infested areas. i believe
those sectors include… if you can believe it justice and law which if just
short of god himself, lets see the gleeming health care, certainly the food
industry, insurance, transportation, supposely toxic managements, caring
for your children, telling us about family values, perversion of sexuality and
whatever else led to a outrageously to the tune that 25% or so in the population is employed by the government itself. Too bad the local farmer
and those gifted well enough to really encourage health care are long gone,
wise judges utmost integrity…. it’s become.. it’s… it’s it’s a culture contaminated by parasites/leeches, well how much? does the truth even matter anymore cuz by the time attorney’s get done serving there might not
even be any truth no more…… crew, i definitely have respect for them, just
may still be some integrity left there :)
wow kay.that’s quite an amazing cut-and-paste there…
March 21st, 2007 at 8:50 pmThe memos showed this was a well planned crime to save all the GOP criminals. I so noticed in the memo’s that many lawyers who had pending crimes were let go. The missing memos will most likely show alot more. Now one slipped in and had the notification response from the White House. Looks like that was the mistake yes that memo wasn’t to be given to Congress but in the rush to cover up one slipped in. I noticed Patrick Fitzgerald’s firing was in place before the end of Libby’s trial. If only Jake were a lawyer he would know how to cover up a GOP dismissal. The DOJ had to many honest lawyers that was the problem. I wonder what it really means to Gonzales when he sworn on the bible to up hold the law when he was sworn in as Attorney General. Looks like that lie number two.
March 21st, 2007 at 8:51 pm10 years from now we’ll still be reading about convictions freshly obtained against republican’ts and their operatives whose 14 year ride on the corruption express has been the dirtiest in American political history.
March 21st, 2007 at 8:51 pmPlease stop posting long articles and just post the url and maybe a summary of the good parts.
March 21st, 2007 at 9:04 pm#25… over 30 years ago, i heard about all the ANTI corruption groups
supposely cleaning up the government.
you would certainly think by now the government would be squeaky and
let what do we have? Leeches + parasites infesting, in fact to the tune
this kind of funny business has in reality been going on for the past 100
years or longer.
and no matter how good the leeches are to a point we really do have a
choice to allow/trust those parasites or do everything in our power to
distance ourselves no matter how good their scandal is
oh no/no… these aren’t rock solid integrity hard work achieve the status
of honest abes….i’m sure some mean well, but the vast majority are operating on survival mode and not related to money/material which in reality means nothing, their acting on all mighty power, self will running…
well to the point it’s irrational control
remember though, to a certain extent, hopefully the truth can be sought,
regardless of all those corrupt god appointed judges and so called lawmakers
cronyism
parasites
leeches
enough to make me…………. ain’t saying it… jimbo well has clearly
March 21st, 2007 at 9:04 pmopened up some more blinders here :)
LISTEN PEOPLE…………….
TO ME REPUB’S, LEECHES PARASITES… CORRUPTION, SELF WILL RUNNING WILD AND POLITICIZING SOCIETY, WHICH FALLS IN THE REALM OF POWER/
MONEY CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY, SIMPLY LEGAL CROOKS AND A BUNCH OF HOODLUMS
ENOUGH TO MAKE SOCIETY PUKE :) AND CAN’T EVEN DO THAT WITH ALL THEIR INFESTED PARASITES/LEECHES CORRUPTING EVERYTHING, ENOUGH
TO PUKE.
Now… the coolest dude in the universe hopefully has spoken some truth here, can’t help it i’m so heavenly awesome though :)
who in their right mind, like sheep would run into sectors of society that have become TOTALLY infested with a cesspool of political leeches/parasites, namely corrupted sectors of society most vunerable?
can’t completely avoided due to their rigging or whatever else, but to me
March 21st, 2007 at 9:11 pmparasites, leeches, cronyism, crooks, and all the rest of that insanity, absolutely it sure at by chance… it’s widespread, enough to PUKE!!!!! :)
wow jimbo,coolest dude in the universe, are you high on life or can i get a hit of that?
March 21st, 2007 at 9:13 pmhey!!!
NICO just now on scarborough… w00t!
(such a hotty! … there will be more tv time for that one!)
p.s. – i never watch that show… left it on after countdown and when i heard that name i just had to watch…
nico helped make the subpoena case and stood up to pat buchanan!
March 21st, 2007 at 9:16 pm…
rah rah, i please let god appoint me to serve you, just need your vote
i won i won
abe knows tina who knows jackie, who know lisa
all the wonderful services we all desperately need… to bad you can’t
get them cuz thomas know randy who knows john.
absolutely disgusting, though. oh yeah they serve the people all right
NOW i understand how defense can corrupted and no matter how perverse
all mighty god appointed judges can’t even follow the dog gone law themselves
HALE TO CREW :) …. hope they aren’t infested too
as far as the rest CORRUPT, totally a complete stinking cesspool filled with
miggets, parasites, and leeches…. not everything in society is infested,
sure ain’t a one in a million chance, how much corruption occurs? how much
does at least specks of truth remain or are still fully based on truth, ain’t
political corruption exceedingly difficult to prove as it gets more infested
yeah know with all the truth and wisdom and rock solid integrity guess who
March 21st, 2007 at 9:22 pmreally should be a public servant. we’ll i’ll tell you… jimbo dude should be
the president, not a friggin chance :)
bob (not the hacker):
if a republican commits a crime and the congress is republican, is it really a crime?
Of course. See how easy it is to answer questions? I wonder why no one would answer mine?
March 21st, 2007 at 9:24 pm#34 dude get a hit to open up the blinders, based on truth and distance
March 21st, 2007 at 9:26 pmyourself from all the leeches/parasites who claim god appointed them
to be ultimate gods :)…. hopefully still truth remains as in my books
supposely the honesty will expose expose the truth…. hey but what’s
truth? ain’t that what attorney are good at prefabricating, by the time
their done nobody will even have a clue what truth is anymore
#3 – Jake,
Both Carter and Clinton have been absolved in numerous posts and reports before. As I said, it is your career that has made you what you are today:
Jake worked as a crash dummy for the NASA Rocket Sled program.
After each run they would scrape his brains off of the base of the sled into a bucket, turn him upside down, put a funnel into each nostril and pour them back in.
Jake still sloshes when he nods or shakes his head.
Every once in a while, the air relief valve at the back of Jake’s head malfunctions and a little grey matter drips out. Of late, no one notices any difference when that occurs.
You have yet to provide an alternative Resume.
March 21st, 2007 at 9:30 pmlet’s take a vote:who here thinks jimbo is on acid. I vote yes.
March 21st, 2007 at 9:31 pm***mmmm…good times,good times….
I don’t want just a transcript. I want sworn, public testimony. It’s galls me enough to think these people are being paid by us, the taxpayers. At least, let’s get some of our money’s worth. I want to see the expressions on Rove’s and Miers’ faces when they testify. I’ll bet Rove screws up and stammers or blushes.
March 21st, 2007 at 9:32 pmOf course. See how easy it is to answer questions? I wonder why no one would answer mine?
Comment by Jake
Because your questions, like that answer are dishonest and “clever” attempts to avoid real answers and to avoid making substantive posts.
Constant repetition proves nothing, Jake, except a lack of substance.
March 21st, 2007 at 9:39 pm#40 i’m really getting tired, but all i can say is i don’t use no drugs, don’t even drink, ain’t on no mental health care cures and am throughly
March 21st, 2007 at 9:39 pmnormal, ain’t no defects here nor disorders. really honestly, i am throughly
straight and psychologically normal, by all definitions normal as far as mental health with no additional health care therapy or chemical cures,
that is i am what’s consider normal :) … do have strengths, do have weaknesses, some may consider me ab, but rarely…. that is by all definitions i am very much normal in upstairs health, ain’t no nuggets missing upstairs and ain’t on no drugs legal or from the under earth based :) … i really don’t associate with those types of folks yeah know :)
Of course. See how easy it is to answer questions? I wonder why no one would answer mine?
Comment by Jake
What NEW question do you want answered? How about “who’s your daddy?” Answer-Hitler, during a conjugal visit. Orrrr “Where did you leave your false teeth?” Answer-they fell out in your ass. Any other questions?
March 21st, 2007 at 9:42 pmPass the ammunition and don’t shoot ’til ya see the yella of thier bellies!
March 21st, 2007 at 9:54 pmthe Engal special on MSNBC is coming on-I had it muted and the person typing the feed on captions typed–i kid you not- “tonight, we look into the death of war–depth of war”
March 21st, 2007 at 10:01 pmsimple mistype? or slip of the truth? you be the judge/…
Please stop entertaining the trolls! They are paid operatives whose mission is to get on non-rightwing sites and spew their imbecilities.
These trolls are abysmally stupid, crassly ignorant, and totally brainwashed by the Bush Nazi propagandists. Ignore them.
Thank you.
March 21st, 2007 at 10:02 pmpeace out yall. Bond is calling..
March 21st, 2007 at 10:02 pm.
Soon we are all going to find out how far the Bush crime family is willing to go maintain power. My guess is farther than any rational person can imagine. The only thing I can think of that could turn this around for the scumbags is a terrorist attack.
March 21st, 2007 at 10:04 pmCarter was “absolved”? Just this morning on KNX News Radio I heard him interviewed and he said he did not remember the specifics about the Marston firing. I guess I must have missed it where you guys ever answered the question though.
March 21st, 2007 at 10:05 pm#21 Thanks for the Charlton/Kolbe connection into the pedophilia going on within the Page Program. Seeing Hastert today on the hearings reminded me of his complicity in the Foley Scandal – something which seems to be either slipping through the cracks or obscured by the increasing whirlpool of filth encapsulating this presidency right now. Guess there’s time to get to the Foley Scandal and hold Denny Hastert and Boehner, his co-conspirator, accountable.
March 21st, 2007 at 10:08 pmI must be mistaken about Clinton ever pardoning Marc Rich then too.
March 21st, 2007 at 10:09 pmFor the latest news, email archives, hearings, legal filings and other essential documents on the Bush DOJ prosecutor firings, see:
March 21st, 2007 at 10:09 pm“The U.S. Attorney Scandal Documents.”
Know this. The President’s EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE means you can’t supeana him. That’s what Bill O’Reilly was saying in his “talking points” segment.
So suck on that libs.
March 21st, 2007 at 10:24 pmJake,
March 21st, 2007 at 10:25 pmI will put it simply as possible – Marston was a holdover from the Ford administration. He had as much expertise as a prosecuting attorney as Clarabelle. He was bumbling the Eilberg case so badly that it appeared that the man would be acquitted. Honk, honk.
Bill O’Reilly is the only person on this planet who has less legal knowledge than Jake.
March 21st, 2007 at 10:28 pmhead- it’s as if you revel in the fact your leader is a criminial. As if that is a good quality of a president. Why don’t you get your sorry ass over to Iraq to fight the good fight of imperial conquest? Sun too much for you? Are you a ginger kid?
March 21st, 2007 at 10:36 pmSo they ACTUALLY FOUND SOME-THING(not ONE) WHO WAS WORSE THAN Tom “Lamprey/Hagfish” DeLay”!!!!! WHODATHUNK IT!!!!! BOY, THIS GUY Rick Renzi WOULD OVERSHADOW THE LIKES OF DeLay, Ney, Cunt-ingham, WOW!!!! LET’S SEE IF HE HAS ANY DOPE OR DIRT ON Rove, CHIMPya, Cheney, Bushland Uber Allies THAT COULD DEEP-SIX THESE CREEPS AND SCUTTLE THE CHIMPya/Cheney SHIT-SHIP OF STATE—-NOW THAT WOULD BE WORTH A PLEA-BARGAIN TO GET THESE F*CKERS AND NAIL THEIR SORRY ASSES TO THE WALL—–WITH DISPATCH!!!!! HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH!!!!!
March 21st, 2007 at 10:43 pmBefore the end of the week there will be a compromise: Bush accepts Gonzales’s resignation, Rove and Miers will testify under oath, and in exchange the Democrats hold off impeachment of Bush until August of this year (6 months). You have to think the end is near when the only “conservative” you see on TV defending the GOP is disgraced ex-GOP Congressman Tom Delay who is plugging his book (No Defeat, No Surrender) that details his defeat and surrender.
March 21st, 2007 at 10:43 pmbuzzbomb: I understand your frustration, but I beg to differ–we don’t want or need anymore people over there fighting. Too many good men have already died for this President’s folly. We have had enough war and death to go around for a long time–another soldier over there in that GOP-made mess will only make it worse.
March 21st, 2007 at 10:46 pmAlso, Jake,
Aaron G. Stock posted on March 15, 2007 @ 5:36 pm:
Also, in Clinton’s case, the guy investigating Rostenkowski was a holdover from the Bush Administration.
Back to Carter’s case:
Let me also point out, which I haven’t before, the final sentences of this TIME article, “Again, the FBI Gets Its Manâ€:
Bell offered the outgoing prosecutor a three-month extension, but Marston declined. Said he: “I’ve been crippled by the events of the past few weeks. I don’t want to be a lame duck.â€
Despite this unsigned TIME editorial’s criticism of Carter’s Marston firing as “inept,†it states:
Yet by all accounts, this information did not travel up the department hierarchy in time to warn Bell and Carter away from the urgings of Eilberg, whose telephone conversation with the President could be construed as an effort to obstruct justice.
Carter and Bell stated that they intended for the investigations in Philadelphia, including Eilberg’s, to continue, and in Eilberg’s case, they certainly did. In the absence of any solid evidence, I am satisfied that Carter did not obstruct justice.
I can testify that I do not know Aaron G. Stock from Adam.
March 21st, 2007 at 10:52 pmCarter was “absolved� Just this morning on KNX News Radio I heard him interviewed and he said he did not remember the specifics about the Marston firing. I guess I must have missed it where you guys ever answered the question though. Comment by Jake — March 21, 2007 @ 10:05 pm
I already sent you the article that *proved* this. Don’t blame your ignorance and poor reading comprehension on others “JakeOff”. That’s the problem of the bad parenting that raised an idiot like yourself.
March 21st, 2007 at 10:54 pmRight, right, and Bill Clinton never pardoning Marc Rich either. Are you going to forget that once Bush starts sign pardons?
March 21st, 2007 at 11:48 pmAs far as I can tell, however, neither you nor Bluedog49 answered my simple hypothetical question — if Clinton and Carter fired prosecutors to keep them from investigating their friends, they obstructed justice too? If you know they were “absolved” then it’s even easier to answer.
March 21st, 2007 at 11:56 pmJake said on March 21, 2007 @ 11:48 pm
Right, right, and Bill Clinton never pardoning Marc Rich either. Are you going to forget that once Bush starts sign pardons?
Geez, do you happen to remember Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan or George H W Bush? Perhaps they served before your time. If not and you fail to remember – visit a specialist in Alzheimer’s. It may not be just your career that is affecting your memory.
March 22nd, 2007 at 12:01 amI must be mistaken about Clinton ever pardoning Marc Rich then too.
Jake loves himself some strawmen.
March 22nd, 2007 at 12:09 am#64 It didn’t happen. Nobody needs to defend Clinton and Carter against your pointless attacks since they have no basis in reality. The fact is you can’t defend Bush…you just try to kick up dust.
March 22nd, 2007 at 12:11 amAs far as I can tell, however, neither you nor Bluedog49 answered my simple hypothetical question — if Clinton and Carter fired prosecutors to keep them from investigating their friends, they obstructed justice too? If you know they were “absolved†then it’s even easier to answer. Comment by Jake — March 21, 2007 @ 11:56 pm
It’s a *hypothetical*, based in a fantasy. When you can *prove* this, the way the current emails – come back and see us *skippy*. Oh wait, you *can’t*. That makes your hypothetical as irrelevant, smearing, and st*pid as you and all of your b*llsh*t posts. Stop Jake’ing off, and join the 21st century, idiot.
March 22nd, 2007 at 12:12 amRight, right, and Bill Clinton never pardoning Marc Rich either. Are you going to forget that once Bush starts sign pardons? Comment by Jake — March 21, 2007 @ 11:48 pm
So you’re claiming Marc Rich obstructed federal justice, and interfered with corruption investigations? Or was this just another *irrelevant* post, by our resident Jake’ing off idiot?
March 22nd, 2007 at 12:13 amShort Jake:
Obstruction of justice is ok if you are a Republican. Pardon Libby.
March 22nd, 2007 at 2:30 amJPark:
It’s called a HYPOTHETICAL question for a reason — look the word up if you don’t know what it means.
ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus and Gregor Samsa:
Of course Marc Rich obstructed federal justice — HE FLED FROM PROSECUTION — I never said “Obstruction of justice is ok if you are a Republican” but if you’re O.K. with Rich’s pardon, then there’s no question about Libby (even if he flees to Switzerland, I guess).
If I’m so “irrelevant”, why don’t you guys just stop responding to me?
March 22nd, 2007 at 9:47 amGood to see you, Jake! And I’m also glad to see that you feel this way:
See how easy it is to answer questions? I wonder why no one would answer mine?
Because I’ve been trying to get you to aswer a simple question about your “separation of powers” expertise (of which you have have much, I’m sure) across three threads now. Maybe you can tackle it here, since it’s “so easy to answer questions”.
How does “separation of powers” affect whether the President’s aides are sworn in to testify UNDER OATH, or whether they testify WITHOUT being sworn in?
Simple question, right? Thanks.
March 22nd, 2007 at 10:22 amEwww – every time she touches his arm, he rubs his leg.
March 22nd, 2007 at 11:11 amOh, KRank, now I see where you asked a questions I “refused” to answer (on a dead thread, no less). Not surprising. For anyone else interested, I answered this in the more current “Senate Approves Subpoena” thread above.
March 22nd, 2007 at 4:08 pmAs long as you remain civil and answer my questions, I will always do my best to extend you the same courtesy.
March 22nd, 2007 at 4:09 pm