Comments on: FACT CHECK: Conservatives Attacking Schumer Don’t Mention D’Amato’s ‘Conflict Of Interest’ http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/ Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:25:58 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Raymond Funamoto http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2482514 Raymond Funamoto Fri, 23 Mar 2007 01:13:22 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2482514 TYPICAL repugnant-repub rightwingnut crank fudge-pachyderm UNDERHANDED, DOUBLEDEALING, BACKSTABBING HYPOCRISY----"When WE do it, IT's OKAY--When YOU do it, IT's ILLEGAL!" THAT KIND OF LYING CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR CAN NOT AND WILL NOT BE TOLERATED IN CONGRESS----Specter WILL BECOME A DECEASED SPOOK and Cornyn BETTER START GETTING INTO RAISING HIS NAMESAKE "Corn" BECAUSE HE WON'T BE HERE IN 2008, ALONG WITH Specter AND OTHER repugnant-repubs!!!!! TYPICAL repugnant-repub rightwingnut crank fudge-pachyderm UNDERHANDED, DOUBLEDEALING, BACKSTABBING HYPOCRISY—-”When WE do it, IT’s OKAY–When YOU do it, IT’s ILLEGAL!” THAT KIND OF LYING CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR CAN NOT AND WILL NOT BE TOLERATED IN CONGRESS—-Specter WILL BECOME A DECEASED SPOOK and Cornyn BETTER START GETTING INTO RAISING HIS NAMESAKE “Corn” BECAUSE HE WON’T BE HERE IN 2008, ALONG WITH Specter AND OTHER repugnant-repubs!!!!!

]]> By: tom baker http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2471962 tom baker Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:42:40 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2471962 Hey Flake-O - Karl Rove called. He said you use your teeth too much, so I'm cancelling our appointment. Regards, Ken Mehlman Hey Flake-O – Karl Rove called. He said you use your teeth too much, so I’m cancelling our appointment.

Regards,

Ken Mehlman

]]> By: Flaco http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2467651 Flaco Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:24:26 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2467651 <strong>Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) again shmuck and media whore for the left.</strong> Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) again shmuck and media whore for the left.

]]> By: big papa http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2465661 big papa Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:35:44 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2465661 Comment by Keith Gore Wiseman #81 <strong>Thanks for THAT one Keith... ...and HOW ABOUT... ...the '04 (REselection campaign)... ...Ohio and Black(beard)... ...THEY did it to us AGAIN! ...so to hell with the Repulsivescum and their conned'self-servative slaves... ...PURGE the Congress and the country of 'em... ...Loyalist TRAITORS ALL!</strong> Comment by Keith Gore Wiseman #81

Thanks for THAT one Keith…

…and HOW ABOUT…

…the ‘04 (REselection campaign)…

…Ohio and Black(beard)…

…THEY did it to us AGAIN!

…so to hell with the Repulsivescum and their conned’self-servative slaves…

…PURGE the Congress and the country of ‘em…

…Loyalist TRAITORS ALL!

]]> By: CoffinsDrapedWithFlags http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2463146 CoffinsDrapedWithFlags Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:25:36 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2463146 No, Arlan Spector, it is you that have crossed the line. Remember your buddy, Rickie the Rooster? Pennsylvanians gladly said good bye to Rickie. It's your turn in 2008. Read somewhere that, you, Arlan, don't support funding the troops. You will be an easy target in 2008. Just keep on sucking up to the boy Bush and you will be looking for a new job in January 2009. PA is getting "bluer" everyday. No, Arlan Spector, it is you that have crossed the line. Remember your buddy, Rickie the Rooster? Pennsylvanians gladly said good bye to Rickie. It’s your turn in 2008. Read somewhere that, you, Arlan, don’t support funding the troops. You will be an easy target in 2008. Just keep on sucking up to the boy Bush and you will be looking for a new job in January 2009. PA is getting “bluer” everyday.

]]> By: Keith Gore Wiseman http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2463099 Keith Gore Wiseman Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:23:27 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2463099 If Katherine Harris didn't have a conflict of interest in being Sec. of State in Fla., monitoring elections, and also being Bush's campaign manager, there is no such thing as conflict of interest. The Nixon Party is being bitten by their own snake. If Katherine Harris didn’t have a conflict of interest in being Sec. of State in Fla., monitoring elections, and also being Bush’s campaign manager, there is no such thing as conflict of interest. The Nixon Party is being bitten by their own snake.

]]> By: shane http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2462303 shane Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:53:54 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2462303 Of course he does…. That’s why they put him on the Warren Commission. Comment by RemoveBush — March 22, 2007 @ 12:04 pm So another Texan could be President? Of course he does…. That’s why they put him on the Warren Commission.

Comment by RemoveBush — March 22, 2007 @ 12:04 pm

So another Texan could be President?

]]> By: shane http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2462107 shane Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:46:44 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2462107 This partisan war that Democrats are itching for will be your downfall But I thank you. I can’t wait to smear Schumer the way you have smeared our Commander in Chief. Comment by Liberals Heart Terrorists — March 22, 2007 @ 11:33 am BRING IT ON! This partisan war that Democrats are itching for
will be your downfall
But I thank you. I can’t wait to smear Schumer the way you have smeared our Commander in Chief.

Comment by Liberals Heart Terrorists — March 22, 2007 @ 11:33 am

BRING IT ON!

]]> By: getaclue http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2462062 getaclue Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:44:51 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2462062 this site cracks me up. SCRUB SCRUB SSCRUB and it calls itself a progressive news site. HAHAHAHAHAHA why do you keep scrubbing legitimate comments LIKE ARLEN SPECTOR YOU ARE THE CAUSE OF THIS MESS ...... DO US ALL A FAVOR AND DROP DEAD this site cracks me up. SCRUB SCRUB SSCRUB

and it calls itself a progressive news site. HAHAHAHAHAHA

why do you keep scrubbing legitimate comments LIKE

ARLEN SPECTOR YOU ARE THE CAUSE OF THIS MESS …… DO US ALL A FAVOR AND DROP DEAD

]]> By: hellinabucket http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2461472 hellinabucket Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:29:42 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2461472 #70. SLAM! #70. SLAM!

]]> By: Tom3 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2461435 Tom3 Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:29:09 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2461435 Jake and Roger and the other Repuke trolls all sold their souls to the Devil himself. The Religious Reich Wingnuts and the Repukes are joined at the hip. The Religious Reich are NOT real Christians. They are haters who follow the Antichrist. Jake and Roger and the other Repuke trolls all sold their souls to the Devil himself.

The Religious Reich Wingnuts and the Repukes are joined at the hip.

The Religious Reich are NOT real Christians. They are haters who follow the Antichrist.

]]> By: R http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2460793 R Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:17:28 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2460793 Actually, #73 was another, very verbal assault on Specter that I was agreeing with, before it was deleted. Actually, #73 was another, very verbal assault on Specter that I was agreeing with, before it was deleted.

]]> By: R http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2460710 R Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:16:00 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2460710 #73- I concur, on that. I imagine Michael J. Fox regrets his allignment during the Limbaugh slur, don't you think? #73- I concur, on that. I imagine Michael J. Fox regrets his allignment during the Limbaugh slur, don’t you think?

]]> By: Abby http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2460489 Abby Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:11:53 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2460489 The fact that the Bush cabal have committed the egregious crime of politicizing the justice department remains a fact and all their attacks against Schumer will not make that crime go away. It is this Republican trait of ignoring the message and attacking the messenger that enabled the world's only super power to get it's ass kicked in Iraq. The fact that the Bush cabal have committed the egregious crime of politicizing the justice department remains a fact and all their attacks against Schumer will not make that crime go away.

It is this Republican trait of ignoring the message and attacking the messenger that enabled the world’s only super power to get it’s ass kicked in Iraq.

]]> By: R http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2460319 R Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:08:23 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2460319 #65- They'll say anything. They've sold thier collective souls to the devil, or whoever that monkey is in the WH. Throw them a banana and they'll wave and perk right up. Cute, aren't they? -heh- #65- They’ll say anything. They’ve sold thier collective souls to the devil, or whoever that monkey is in the WH. Throw them a banana and they’ll wave and perk right up. Cute, aren’t they? -heh-

]]> By: tom baker http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2460236 tom baker Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:06:52 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2460236 LHT The partisan war that Republicans started with the world in the '80s IS their downfall and we are watching them fall right now - today. You righty, trollie types prove that you <em>did </em>actually just fall off the turnip truck when you relentlessly spew garbage like LHT and Pattycakes, et al. Some of us have been paying very close attention for a very long time now. We are immune to Righty PR spin, we know the history of the issues and the players, and you wingers have absolutely no idea how laughably stupid you appear to be when you start in with the jibber-jabber. You might have entertained some of the dumber kids in your high school classes, but that's the last time anyone thought you were funny, or smart, in a positive way. Dragging yourselves in here every day is like one of those little ADD kids with a green snot-bubble in his right nostril yanking constantly at his Mother's clothes, demanding a treat that she does not have, and wouldn't give him if she did. Give it up - scrape up a little dignity and self-respect - hang out at free republic and team up with like-minded pals to plot your next big takeover, how'bout?? LHT

The partisan war that Republicans started with the world in the ’80s IS their downfall and we are watching them fall right now – today. You righty, trollie types prove that you did actually just fall off the turnip truck when you relentlessly spew garbage like LHT and Pattycakes, et al.

Some of us have been paying very close attention for a very long time now. We are immune to Righty PR spin, we know the history of the issues and the players, and you wingers have absolutely no idea how laughably stupid you appear to be when you start in with the jibber-jabber. You might have entertained some of the dumber kids in your high school classes, but that’s the last time anyone thought you were funny, or smart, in a positive way.

Dragging yourselves in here every day is like one of those little ADD kids with a green snot-bubble in his right nostril yanking constantly at his Mother’s clothes, demanding a treat that she does not have, and wouldn’t give him if she did. Give it up – scrape up a little dignity and self-respect – hang out at free republic and team up with like-minded pals to plot your next big takeover, how’bout??

]]> By: big papa http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2460207 big papa Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:06:20 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2460207 <strong>Changing the FOCUS... ...doesn't change the FACTS... ...FOCUS people... ...FOCUS... ...besides... ...Repulsivescum NEVER met a conflict of interest... ...they couldn't simply IGNORE... ...L'il Dick and Halliburton... ...Scumlia's duck hunting trip with L'il Dick... ...and the SCOTUS' partisan conflict of interest vote in 2000... ...all SCREAM... ...fu*k a conflict of interest, and the Repulsivescum horse it rode in on!</strong> Changing the FOCUS…

…doesn’t change the FACTS…

…FOCUS people…

…FOCUS…

…besides…

…Repulsivescum NEVER met a conflict of interest…

…they couldn’t simply IGNORE…

…L’il Dick and Halliburton…

…Scumlia’s duck hunting trip with L’il Dick…

…and the SCOTUS’ partisan conflict of interest vote in 2000…

…all SCREAM…

…fu*k a conflict of interest, and the Repulsivescum horse it rode in on!

]]> By: pigboy http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2460142 pigboy Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:05:02 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2460142 58. I didn’t think Katherine Harris certifying the election for Bush was a conflict of interest and either is Schumer. Comment by Jake — March 22, 2007 @ 11:49 am There we differ. She put her co-chairmanship of shrub election campaign before her duties. 58. I didn’t think Katherine Harris certifying the election for Bush was a conflict of interest and either is Schumer.

Comment by Jake — March 22, 2007 @ 11:49 am

There we differ. She put her co-chairmanship of shrub election campaign before her duties.

]]> By: R http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2460111 R Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:04:18 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2460111 Maybe we should get Michael J. Fox on board to speak about his "friend" Specter. That really rubs my fur the wrong way, the way he leaned upon Specter during the Limbaugh attacks. Remember? Maybe we should get Michael J. Fox on board to speak about his “friend” Specter. That really rubs my fur the wrong way, the way he leaned upon Specter during the Limbaugh attacks. Remember?

]]> By: RemoveBush http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-2/#comment-2460106 RemoveBush Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:04:09 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/22/schumer-conflict-of-interest/#comment-2460106 "<em>Arlen Spector serves at the pleasure of the President, don’t you Sen. Spector. Remember, we still have the genital electrodes. Comment by Alberto Gonzales — March 22, 2007 @ 11:58 am</em>" Of course he does.... That's why they put him on the Warren Commission. “Arlen Spector serves at the pleasure of the President, don’t you Sen. Spector. Remember, we still have the genital electrodes.

Comment by Alberto Gonzales — March 22, 2007 @ 11:58 am”

Of course he does…. That’s why they put him on the Warren Commission.

]]>