Lora,

…otherwise why would they be so reluctant to do so?

OTOH, if he is actually, even a tiny bit, leaning on Fred Fieldling (and being known as such for the record), then he KNOWS this is huge.

First of all, what are you doing to help win the war in Iraq or on terror? Why aren’t you in Iraq or Afghanistan, which really should be the center of the war on terror?
Secondly, if you think receiving a BJ in the Oval Office is such a serious issue, can you explain to us what gay hooker/phony journalist Jeff Gannon (aka James Guckert) was doing in the White House on several nights when no press conferences were even scheduled?

Well, you thought wrong. Nancy never said that they were going to impeach Bush. As a matter of fact she said the exact opposite. I think she is wrong, I do think that impeaching Bush and Chaney should be at the top of their “to do” list, but it’s not.

Why don’t you get your facts straight before you post inane things like that? Do you really not mind that people are laughing at you because you are such a joke?

The people who voted Democratic in 2006 (this included a lot of former Republics) did so mostly because of Iraq and because of Bush’s assault on our constitution.

So, Cornyn, how are the facts going to come out if you won’t investigate? Since you think it’s much ado about nothing?

Hopefully the Democrats can force an ethics probe into this stuff because what the two Republics did with Inglaisis was definitely an ethics violation. And I’m pretty sure Cornyn would see it that way if it had been done by Democrats in a Democratic administration.

Comment by Daryll — March 23, 2007 @ 12:49 pm

I refuse to support a war that was started against a country that did nothing to us. They were not a threat despite the BS job that Bush and the media pulled on the American public. Let me repeat…they were not a threat…even Colin Powell and Condi Rice, only months before 9/11, said the same thing. I can give you a link to their speeches/interviews if you like.

Powell said that Iraq had been contained, the sanctions had worked and were continuing to work (and actually had been adjusted so that they remained effective), Iraq was not a threat to the U.S. nor to its neighbors, and Saddam did not have the capability to restart any WMD programs (including a nuclear program).

In a separate event, Condi echoed Powell and said Saddam was not a threat to anyone.

Our own government asked relatives of Iraqis living and working in the U.S. to go home to Iraq and ask their family members who were in positions to know about any WMD programs what the status was of any programs. They did, and reported back to the U.S. officials that no programs were in operation. The U.S. officials called them liars.

Tell us, oh wise one, what Bush did to punish bin Laden once the CIA confirmed they were responsible for bombing the U.S.S. Cole? Wait…I can answer that for you: Not a damned thing.

When was it that Cheney organized a task force on terrorism and had their first meeting? Oh wait…he didn’t.

When was it that the administration held its first cabinet-level meeting that addressed terrorism? That’s right…a few days before 9/11…almost 9 f*cking months AFTER they took office and knowing full well the history of bin Laden’s attacks and planned attacks and foiled attacks against the U.S. They admitted they knew this history well when they labeled the information in the infamouse 8/6/01 PDB as “historical information.”

Clinton wanted to expand the program to wiretap terrorists (legally, I might add) and wanted to add tagents to explosives to make it easier to track their sources…two things that would aid in our fight against terrorism. The Republicans in the Congress they controlled laughed at him and essentially said “no way.”

As for this so-called “war” (I use these terms and quotations marks because war has never been declared. Gonzo even admitted it. I can give you a link if you’d like), you and the Bush butt-lickers can just cram it.

Comment by Daryll — March 23, 2007 @ 12:55 pm

And it was none of your g*d damned business.

Besides, go read the Starr Report, numb nuts. Clinton and Lewinsky flirted with each other for a time before their first sexual encounter. And on the day of that first encounter, guess who made the first “move”? That’s right…Lewinsky did, when she raised her dress to show Clinton the straps of her thong. She knew exactly what she was doing.

But all you Republican idiots were just foaming at the mouths to get Clinton any way you could. All the whining about that poor Monica Lewinsky and how terrible it was what Clinton did to her. That poor little Monica was a consenting adult, you idiot. An ignorant and immature adult, but also a consenting adult. Clinton didn’t force her to do anything she didn’t want to do.

Comment by Daryll — March 23, 2007 @ 12:24 pm

So where do these fall on your list? Same sex marriage and flag burning are still the two most important issues in this country…right?

He couldn’t take care of his own sister!!! yet we have .. “I’m Going To Stay Focused On Our Kids” yeah ok…

Alberto Gonzales’ sudden moment in the unflattering spotlight has prompted a new look at his background.

Gonzales’ younger sister Theresa plead guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. Nine years later, while Gonzales was on the Texas Supreme Court, his mother and another brother signed over their houses to a bail bondsman to raise bail for Theresa after she was charged with the same offense.

http://www.buffalonews.com/180/story/34944.html

It was not hard to spot that White House and Justice Department officials, and members of Congress, may have violated 18 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1520, the federal obstruction of justice statute.

Let’s take the case of Carol Lam, United States attorney in San Diego. The day the news broke that Ms. Lam, who had already put one Republican congressman in jail, was investigating a second one, Mr. Sampson wrote an e-mail message referring to the “real problem we have right now with Carol Lam.” He said it made him think that it was time to start looking for a replacement.

http://www.nytimes.com/ 2007/ 03/ 19/ opinion/ 19mon4.html?ex=1331956800&en=ffab854496251b4b&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss

Couldn’t have been said better, mrJJ,!

But Cornyn (who sadly was the attorney general in my State before he became a senator) says that he doesn’t see what “all the hubbub is all about.” Violations of the law by NeoCons and their pimps and enablers (Libby, Abramoff, Lay, etc., etc., etc.) are just “hubbub” to this corrupt former Texas attorney general. It is time to investigate Cornyn and his involvement in violations of the law himself!

Comment by Mike #105

Mike,

…or do you enjoy being USED?

Specter’s performance Thursday during the Senate Judiciary Committee’s debate over issuing White House subpoenas in the firing of U.S. attorneys was certainly no exception.

For the sad story, see:
“Specter’s Failure to

Daryll, reading #83 would at least START to answer your question. I don’t think, however, that you’re here to LEARN.

But, after all, they are Republicans, so we should know better than to expect competence at this point.