House approves redeployment.
By on Mar 23rd, 2007 at 1:22 pm
House approves redeployment.
With a 218-212 vote, the House passed the U.S. Troops Readiness, Veterans’ Health and Iraq Accountability Act, which calls for the redeployment of troops out of Iraq by 2008.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Bush
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Iraq
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
McCain
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Technology
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
VETO!!!
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:24 pmWoopi
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:24 pmLike I’m not going to veto this.. Yeah, right.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:24 pmBush wanted benchmarks and now he has them. What is the problem with accountability Repukes?
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:26 pmWhat’s this Troops Readiness stuff? We go with the army we got, not the one we want. And Veteran’s Health? come on! We don’t care what happens to the soldiers after they get shot. Unless they can heal and then get redeployed, they are useless to us. This whole thing is a crock!
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:28 pmI wonder what Senator Lieberman will do now. I hope he finally decides to caucus with the GOP.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:28 pmThere is no ground or position the Republicans can take on this falsely asserting it hamstrings the Generals or even better yet ‘hurts the troops’ when they forced withdrawal and limited funding for Bosnia and their god Reagen cut and run from Beureit. Sad Repukes want to protect our troops by keeping them in a war.
Checkmate.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:28 pmPrepare for a tantrum from the retard in chief. Maybe Victor Ashe can swing by and “Salve” his ego.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:29 pmJake has just invented “Sloppy Firsts”
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:30 pmHeterodoxy:
Benchmarks are one thing — telling the enemy the DATE of our troop movements used to be treason.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:30 pmhallo all. Another wonderful veto in line here. I love howq or president an say no to helping to cure horrible diseases and no to making sure that are military is not utterly crippled for generations…
i wonder what it’s like to have no soul…
whuttup Jake? is this ‘the real’Jake?
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:32 pmEven though it doesn’t pull the troops out tommorrow I must admit Pelosi did a good job in getting the votes for this bill. I am sure it wasn’t easy as the vote shows and I think she has passed her first major test as Speaker of the House.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:32 pmThe water just got heavier.
Come Jake, firehead, R2 why do you run from benchmarks, accountability, results, objective facts? You salute endless spending, occupation, and no leaving?
Funny, thats what Osama bin Forgotten has advocated.
Sad when GWB stated in the 2004 Presidential debate he was not going to let Osama bin Forgotten dicate the foreign policy of this country but GWB is falling right into his goals.
Good Lord you people are retards.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:32 pmDude, “2008″ isn’t a date. It’s a year. Get over yourself.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:33 pmJake:
If telling the enemy the date of our troop movements is treason, then the Bush administration is guilty. They do it all of the time. They leak everything down to the operation names to the press before the operations even begin.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:34 pm#10 – BZZZZZZZZZTTTTTT WRONG
They have an established government, a constitution, we have completed the training of 350,000 Iraqi troops. The military job is done and the DOD has concurred stating this is no longer a military objective or military solution.
How does your rectum look today?
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:35 pmI hope he finally decides to caucus with the GOP.
Comment by Jake — March 23, 2007 @ 1:28 pm
Mr. Independent Voter.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:35 pmDems are preparing to reverse “law” on Habeas Corpus.
[from: http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200702/021207a.html ]
…enator Chris Dodd (D-CT) today reintroduced his bill making important changes to the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which in its current form, does not provide a credible process for bringing suspected terrorists to justice. Sen. Dodd first introduced his bill last Congress and after working with human rights groups and experts in military law, Sen. Dodd was joined by Senators Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Russ Feingold (D-WI) introducing the measure again in the 110th Congress.
The “Restoring the Constitution Act of 2007†restores Habeas Corpus rights, bars evidence gained through torture or coercion and reinstates U.S. adherence to the Geneva Conventions in order to protect the nation’s military personnel abroad…
Not enough fear, doom, and gloom, and too much hope for ReichWingNuts and ChristoFascists.
For the rest of us… well it’s about time!
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:36 pmBut……but……..but…… Drudge said the House was in Chaos???!!!!!!!
I am so confused.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:36 pmREMOVE THE TROOPS NOW. Why consign 2,000 more troops and 100,000 more Iraqis to die for an illegal immoral war that CANNOT be won with force?
This is something to celebrate? The Dems have just BOUGHT THEMSELVES a failed Occupation. They now co-own it with Bush. What a f*cin embarassment.
The Dems buckled. The legislation should’ve called for immediate withdrawal. The Dems shouldn’t of given an inch.
It’ll never pass the senate. If it does Bush will veto it. And they don’t have the votes to override the veto.
The Dems need to buy some media outlets and get the message out.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:37 pmTroop movements include reducing and increasing force levels.
Therefore, Bush announcing his escalation back in January would be considered treason in your book.
Can we impeach now?
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:37 pmwhiteyfresh:
This is “the real” Jake — who’s it hanging, my friend?
Your Conscience:
Did you see my post # 10?
Thomas and TZ:
The Commander-in-Chief is in CHARGE of troop movements — read the bill for specific dates Congress is setting — that has NEVER happened before in “wartime” (and please don’t give me the “Congress didn’t DECLARE war” line either).
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:38 pmI wonder – would they have questioned Clinton if he “sat for well over 5 minutes” before doing anything?
9-11-01: Where Was Bush?
Just some food for thought…
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:38 pmtelling the enemy the DATE of our troop movements used to be treason.
Comment by Jake
REAGAN COMMITTED TREASON??? SAY IT ISN’T SO!
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:39 pmCool… Step one has been taken out to get out of this four year maddness.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:39 pmSo do we.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:39 pm… further, this states very clearly how we can proceed as a nation.
Sen. Dodd: … “But there is a right way to do this and a wrong way to do this. It’s clear the people who perpetrated these horrendous crimes against our country and our people have no moral compass and deserve to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. But in taking away their legal rights, the rights first codified in our country’s Constitution, we’re taking away our own moral compass, as well. 
So much for the Greedy ‘Ol Parasites being the party of morality. Unless you count the Taliban Fundy approach to Fear Induction and Liberty Removal as being somehow “moral”.
ITMFA now!!!
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:39 pmA veto won’t be necessary. Democrats won’t get the 50 they need in the House. WHY – because they are cowards. They don’t have the balls to stand up for what they beleive in.
Pelosi = Al Qaeda’s girlfriend
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:39 pmThe Iraqis will now stand up, or fall flat on their faces.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:40 pmAnybody wanna guess which?
Thank God they passed this. Now I know my peanuts will be stored proberly in Ga. And the California Spinach growers will be happy too.
Come on, if the Dems actually wanted some wiggle-room passing this, why all the pork?
Pass a pork free bill, nothing but defense $, THEN bitch if the Pres. vetos it. All the Dems did is give him ammo to veto it. TOO MUCH PORK.
So much for the “No Pork” Congress.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:40 pmOf course, Bush will veto…if this bill becomes law. We need to ditch all the Representatives from both parties who won’t cut off funding and end this war. And we need Representative who will impeach. This bloody war must end!
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:42 pmI wonder if Bush is going to tap Cheney’s retirement account to buy bullets and grub from Halliburton.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:42 pm“telling the enemy the DATE of our troop movements used to be treason.”
the parents of the more than 150,000 u.s. troops in iraq agree. they want their kids in iraq forever.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:43 pmCongress didn’t declare war you stupid twit.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:43 pmLiberals Heart Terrorists?! BS..
The Republic Party “hearts” sending American soldiers to get their limbs blown off and get killed in Iraq.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:44 pmBenchmarks are one thing — telling the enemy the DATE of our troop movements used to be treason.
Comment by Jake
Iraq never attacked us. The Iraqi people are not the enemy. Your entire argument is based on fantasy.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:44 pmA wasn’t. ReichWingNuts and ChristoFascists got their way through fear and lying. WHY – because they are cowards. They don’t have the balls to stand up for the truth. They only know how to line their own greedy pockets at the expense of others.
Bush = Al Qaeda’s tool
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:45 pmThey don’t have the balls to stand up for what they beleive in.
Comment by Liberals Heart Terrorists
Uh, they just did dumbass. How heavy is the water now?
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:46 pmLHT- You and people that think like you are al queda’s bitches because you follow an idiotic strategy that plays into their hands.
Jake- your stupidity reaches new bounds everyday you post here. Get some, loser.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:47 pmtelling the enemy the DATE of our troop movements used to be treason. – Jake
*********************
Useta be that we could actually define the enemy and the mission, too. BTW, what sacrifices have YOU made for duhbya’s little adventure? Inquiring minds want to know.
Duhbya will probably veto this bill, but that puts his (and the other Repukes’) name on the war. No way can they say that the Dems kept us in the quagmire. (God knows they’ll try. But the public, aside from the brainwashed 30%, won’t buy it.)
Too bad there will be a lot of dyin’ between now and the time when duhbya and the gang are brought to account.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:47 pm(and please don’t give me the “Congress didn’t DECLARE war†line either).
Comment by Jake
Congress didnt declare war.
The U.S. Constitution explains it.
The founding fathers wrote it.
You lose.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:47 pmggibson:
North Africa never attacked us either, yet FDR made that the central front after Pearl Harbor. Think outside of the box there, dude. If the terrorists (are THEY the enemy?!) know we are leaving on a date certain, why wouldn’t they just lay low until we leave?
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:47 pmPelosi = Al Qaeda’s girlfriend
Comment by Liberals Heart Terrorists
Yeah that’s why the bill funds more troops to go and kill them in Afghanistan. You know, where they really are.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:49 pmThat’s proud stuff for Dubbie and Dickhead –
using our troops as human shields to protect their political and financial interests – how shamefully pathetic and cowardly can people be?????
LHT – if you had the kind of balls you’re talking about, you’d be in Baghdad right now – pussy.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:50 pmThe Republic Party “hearts†sending American soldiers to get their limbs blown off and get killed in Iraq.
Comment by Publicus — March 23, 2007 @ 1:44 pm
And sporting Purple Heart band-aids while troops are fighting and dying.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:51 pmVetoing the bill, doesn’t get Chimpster the money.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:51 pmcareful, ggibson…press a point too aggressively with Jake, and you could find yourself on The List â„¢.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:52 pmYou mean the cut and run act
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:53 pmggibson:
There are no “magic words” are needed to declare war — the AUMF was sufficient — you think the ROBERTS Supreme Court is going to side with anti-war protesters on that? As long as you answer my questions, in a civil manner, I will always return the same courtesy.
fuzzwald:
How about TERRORISTS WHO WANT TO KILL AMERICANS WHERE EVER THEY CAN? Is that “clear enough” of a definition? The mission currently is to kill them before they kill us.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:53 pmthis means nothing, honestly, if you are going to be non-partisan…this means nothing.
The Senate will not pass this Bill and if and that is a huge IF passes it, the President will veto it.
The sad thing is that Pelosi allowed millions, upon millions, upon millions in pork money to buy the vote of Democrats that where against this bill.
the pork money surmounts to one of the highest spending bills in the history of America….
i thought you Liberals and Democrats were tired of the unchecked spending happening under the Republican controlled congress….what happened? honestly, what happened?
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:53 pmPass a pork free bill, nothing but defense $, THEN bitch if the Pres. vetos it. All the Dems did is give him ammo to veto it. TOO MUCH PORK.
So much for the “No Pork†Congress.
Comment by hacker bob
If the Prez says he is vetoing the bill because of pork I don’t think that a)most people won’t care about the pork when they hear the word troops and b)the Dems will use that against him so quickly after he has signed some of the most prok-laden bills ever.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:53 pmNorth Africa never attacked us either, yet FDR made that the central front after Pearl Harbor. Think outside of the box there, dude. If the terrorists (are THEY the enemy?!) know we are leaving on a date certain, why wouldn’t they just lay low until we leave?
Comment by Jake
Totally irrelevant. We didnt attack North Africa. We attack the nazis that were roaming around in North Africa… but keep stretching… maybe even you will eventually how thin the ice is you are walking on.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:54 pm#47 TMM
Is he doing a knock off of Colbert, with the on notice and dead to me lists? Or is it just a run a the mill righty/nixonian enemy hit list?
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:55 pmYeah, Jake! Duh…VETO it!!!
Then Dumbya will run out of funding and have to bring the troops home anyway! Plus we’ll get to watch him explain how he supported the troops by vetoing the bill that would have ensured they were properly equipped, trained and cared for.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:56 pmthe AUMF was sufficient
Comment by Jake
Says YOU… I will belive Thomas Jefferson and George Washington and Ben Franklin over you or your king wannabe anyday.
ROBERTS Supreme Court
Comment by Jake
I may be wrong, but I grew up in Indiana like Roberts did… I am hoping he shows that he is NOT from the south just when the republicans most need him… we will see.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:57 pmGee Jake you’re f’ing brilliant – Here’s a brain teaser for ya – — if there were any important international terrorist types in Iraq, wouldn’t they have left and started laying low when they saw our big bulky ineffective invasion force headed their way???? Yeah, they prolly did, which is how we’ve ended up disgracing ourselves by hanging around over there getting our guys’ legs blown off killing grandmas and cab drivers for 4 years. If they were smart, and odds are they are, they’d be finding quiet ways to take advantage of our huge diversion, and make some headway in other areas – like recruiting dummies to join their cause, and plotting something else, somewhere else, at a time far removed – and I don’t doubt they’re doing just that, right now.
Comparing anything about this Iraq fiasco to anything about WWII situates you in the same class as morons who deny the holocaust. Not that you had any credibility in the first place. Say some of that stuff in a VFW hall somewhere, though, and I’m sure some Vets will be happy to show you just how much respect they’ve got for ya.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:57 pmLets watch and judge what the retard in chief tells the country, why and how he is gonna veto it.
It will be funny to watch such a retard defending the indefensible.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:58 pmAm I the only one who has figured out that “Jake” is the troll/cultist formerly known as “mighty aphrodite”?
Same aversion to the truth and lies about who and what they are. Same arrogant attitude. Same stench.
Please, I beg of you, avoid it as much as you can so that it will go away sooner.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:59 pmthought you Liberals and Democrats were tired of the unchecked spending happening under the Republican controlled congress….what happened? honestly, what happened?
Comment by howsad
I agree.. these god damn democrats have been pussies for the past 6 years. If the rightwingers got anything right over the past 6 years it is that the democrats are pussies.
I wish true Lincoln republicans would stand up and take the reigns.
March 23rd, 2007 at 1:59 pmPass a pork free bill, nothing but defense $, THEN bitch if the Pres. vetos it. All the Dems did is give him ammo to veto it. TOO MUCH PORK.
So much for the “No Pork†Congress.
Comment by hacker bob — March 23, 2007 @ 1:40 pm
So, military spending is never larded with constituent pork? C’mon, Bob. Defense spending is so fungible because there’s such atrocious military bookkeeping. As Karl Sagan would have opined, “There are billions and billions” of untracked dollars floating around the defense department’s procurement sysytem. Clean that up before lecturing to us about “no pork.”
Think outside of the box there, dude. If the terrorists (are THEY the enemy?!) know we are leaving on a date certain, why wouldn’t they just lay low until we leave?
Comment by Jake — March 23, 2007
Jake is flaky. By his reasoning, we cannot ever know if the surge will be successful for the same reason: why can’t they just lie low until we leave? Or make things so hot somewhere else, that we have to pull troops away to deal with the situation?
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:01 pmDemocracy is a fluid process – it’s very nature is not static. The Democratic majority in congress is no accident. Their presence reflects the will of the nation. We want an end to the war in Iraq. Bravo to Pelosi and the House for doing what they were elected to do.
Bush and the useful idiots who support him do not represent the nation as the whole. Their views are solidly in the minority. Their talking points are very tired and have lost all effect.
The Iraq war will be an albatross around the GOP’s neck for years to come.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:02 pmHector Garcia:
It has to pass the Senate (assuming Lieberman does not defect to the GOP over such a vote) and survive conference committee on any differences before Bush would even have to veto.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:03 pmAshenshard sez:
I don’t think he’s capable of either, AS. Shakey’s just avoiding posters who have a habit of embarrassing him and making him look ridiculous. As that includes just about every non-troll here, that list is gonna get real long real quick.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:03 pmJake — (i.e. “jerk”)
Get thee to Iraq.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:04 pmComment by Jake
Totally irrelevant…
Comment by ggibson — March 23, 2007 @ 1:54 pm
Kinda redundent, eh gg?
Hey Jakeless, hows the joking of rape? the bombing of buildings for politcal gain? the lack of compassion for Mrs.Edwards?
You’re a sick ol bastard, that’s for sure. You’ve offered nothing, time and time again, yet you still get ripped a new one. every. single. time.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:06 pmCan’t you just visit an S & M leather shop down the road for your abuse fix?
(Feel free to put me on your list d’ignore)
Yeah- Now that Bush gets what he wants, let’s see the putz veto the bill. Benchmarks are in place in this bill. If Chimpy wants to appear “unpatriotic”, LET him explain HIS veto to the American people himself. He’s a f*ing coward, so I rather expect he will try to weasel his way around the facts and blame it on someone else.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:07 pmRoger:
You do realize this vote we are talking about FULLY FUNDED the President’s request and extends the war in Iraq for another 22 months, right? Several anti-war Democrats voted AGAINST it for that reason. I’ve stated my opposition on other grounds above.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:07 pm“A veto won’t be necessary. Democrats won’t get the 50 they need in the House. WHY – because they are cowards. They don’t have the balls to stand up for what they beleive in.
Pelosi = Al Qaeda’s girlfriend
Comment by Liberals Heart Terrorists — March 23, 2007 @ 1:39 pm”
Liberals Heart Terrorists, you just simply have no credibility. First of all, they got their votes needed. Secondly, you have (attempted concealed) relations with farm animals; why would anyone take you seriously?
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:07 pmThe debate in Washington is changing. Time to strangle the Democrats with their own hatred.
I think I struck a chord with the Pelosi = Al Qaeda’s girlfriend. It’s true. I bet ya they love her now.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:08 pmNope, no magic words needed, just a Declaration of War.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:09 pmI LOVE A NICE SLAB OF PROK DON’T YOU?dang it! sorry bout the caps.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:09 pmJake#22>Alberto Gonzales :)
#58- A “true” Lincoln Repub would be ashamed of your ideology and throw you into prison for treasonous behavior. The only pussies are the likes of you people, for distorting facts and not taking personal responsibility. Pussy is kind word; f*ing coward, is more like it.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:10 pmA poor analogy?…
A couple has marital problems. The husband is beating his wife. The Dems have just negotiated a settlement.
Under the settlment the husband can continue beating his wife for 18 months more. The Dems sincerely hope they will be able to resolve their marital problems this way. And the Dems agree to continue to pay for any damage to the husbands’ fist or the wife’s body.
However there is one benchmark. The husband cannot hit his wife with a closed fist to the face. The Dems do understand that such a blow to the face would almost certainly be detrimental to the couple’s success.
If the husband does hit his wife in the face with a closed fist during the next 18 months THEN the Dems will stand united. At that point the husband will be asked to leave the house…maybe.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:11 pmThen why are we wasting our time killing Iraqi insurgents?
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:11 pmJake :it’s amazing isn’t it? you post a link, i read it, we discuss, I post a link, you read it, we discuss(although you are probably one-up on me on that one…)key word-discuss.
Ain’t America great?
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:11 pmJake, apparently you’ve been loving too many pigs too…
“How about TERRORISTS WHO WANT TO KILL AMERICANS WHERE EVER THEY CAN? Is that “clear enough†of a definition? The mission currently is to kill them before they kill us.
Comment by Jake — March 23, 2007 @ 1:53 pm”
Hey fuxtik, if fighting them terrorists over there keeps them from attacking elsewhere, why did the bombings in Madrid, Bali, and London happen?
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:12 pmLiberals Heart Terrorists:
Bush just issued his veto threat — see thread above : )
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:12 pmDumb fu*k, the terrorists love republicans like you for providing them with targets to shoot at and for giving the Muslims a reason to hate Americans, due to all of your Islamo Fascist rhetoric.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:13 pmJake,
You’re right – it has never been done before. Given Bush’s mismanagement of the war up to this point and the disasterous consequences this effort brings to America, I commend Congress for getting more involved.
I’m curious though: on what basis do you form such unwavering faith in George Bush? He’s been a failure his whole life up to this point in time, and you are willing to give him free reign on this? Cummon. He needs to be supervised, like a retarded child….
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:13 pmIt has to pass the Senate (assuming Lieberman does not defect to the GOP over such a vote) and survive conference committee on any differences before Bush would even have to veto.
Which sets up the republican candidates for ‘08 to be either for or against George’s Great and Bloody Adventure. In an anti-war mood America, they will lose big time. And then, the incoming Dem president will announce the redeployment, and Jake can go to his grave with the knowledge that there are thousands who preceded him, and that if there is a God in Heaven, they’ll be waiting at the Pearly Gates to remind St.Peter just what he supported with such whole-hearted fervor.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:13 pmPublicus,
it isn’t about the troops at all, it’s about the cash cow that this war is, it’s about Blackwater and no-bid contracts to fellow fascists that lurk in the shadows. This war as all else from this administration is about profiteering.
The evil fascists are making a boatload of money. The Prince family and all their tentacles want this war to go on forever.
Don’t believe the smoke and mirrors, it’s not about anything apparent.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:14 pmR:#65-has the president EVER taken responsibility for anything(bad)?
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:14 pmComment by R
The democrats gave bush the power. He didnt take it. The GOP gave bush the power he didnt take it.
A resonable republican should have acted just as Abraham Lincoln did. DEMAND proof of where America was attacked by Iraq… or NO authorization.
Traitors? Holding the hand of the enemy (Saudi Arabia) EVEN after 911 is what makes one a traitor.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:18 pmNope, no magic words needed, just a Declaration of War.
Comment by Spudge_Boy — March 23, 2007 @ 2:09 pm
Just for giggles, can you please tell us the format required for a Declaration of War? Or at least the wording required by the Constitution?
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:18 pmThen why are we wasting our time killing Iraqi insurgents?
Comment by Spudge_Boy
Exactly!
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:19 pmConservatives love Pigs Especiall Jake and Kinstle :i really, really like that:fuxtik! and Bush never said anything about other attacks around the world, only ‘fighten ‘em over there so they don’t come here’-raise shoulders,gruntgiggle, and wink’-ugh, his winking makes me feel like i’m gonna puke every time.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:19 pmI wish true Lincoln republicans would stand up and take the reigns.
Comment by ggibson #58
…why don’t YOU run your big bad Lincoln Repulsivescum a*s out into the street…
…and take over gibby?
…show us how you copulate Democratic pu*sies…
…we’d LOVE to see your big strong al Crackkker a*s out in the street…
…taking over America for “Lincoln” Repulsivescum…
…hurry up now…
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:20 pmJust for giggles, can you please tell us the format required for a Declaration of War? Or at least the wording required by the Constitution?
Comment by hacker bob
Go to Google.. and search for it… here is a hint… Congress did it in WWII.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:21 pmTimes New Roman, 12 pt font, 1.5 line spaces, printed on Congressional letterhead with 1/2″ margins.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:22 pmToo many open fronts to battle for the republican sc*m.They will miserably fail in one of those political battles.Just statistics.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:23 pmDo you love it when they call you big pa-pa?
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:24 pmThrow your hands in the ayer if yous a true playa?
#76 – I am sorry, what did Republicans do to the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11? Or did Clinton do something?
The notion that anyone is creating terrorists is sick and very misguided. America is a great country and they should have no reason to hate us. They are just jealous of us and people like you are just self-hating, spoiled Americans who should be forced to live like the Islamic militants you spend hours defending.
ThinkProgress HATES America!
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:24 pmA poor analogy…..?
A couple has marital problems. The husband is beating his wife. The Dems have just negotiated a settlement.
Under the settlment the husband can continue beating his wife for 18 months more. The Dems sincerely hope they will be able to resolve their marital problems this way. And the Dems agree to continue to pay for any damage to the husbands’ fist or the wife’s body.
However there is one benchmark. The husband cannot hit his wife with a closed fist to the face. The Dems do understand that such a blow to the face would almost certainly be detrimental to the couple’s success.
If the husband does hit his wife in the face with a closed fist during the next 18 months THEN the Dems will stand united. At that point the husband will be asked to leave the house…maybe.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:25 pmI’m not sure where this is taking us but in georges twisted way it will surely spin.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:26 pmwhiteyfresh:
America is great. Thank you for discussing the issues in a civil manner and always answering my questions. I will continue doing the same with you.
Bo:
Has there been another attack by terrorists on our shores since 9/11? That’s a big part of my decision, as well as the fact I would not undermine ANY Commander-in-Chief (regardless of party) for battle decisions during wartime. Do you know that noted historian David McCoullough has opined that Gen. Washington would have LOST the Revolutionary War if the media was reporting then like they do now?
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:26 pmComment by big papa
They have been shouted down by their GOP “brothers”. If you knew much about American history you would know that Lincoln railed against the Mexican American war. He DEMANDED to know where exactly America was attacked by Mexico. This is something that only one republican has done as far as I know on Iraq and very few democrats.
We all watched these past 6 years as the democrats did not stand up when they had every opportunity to do so. This is why Hillary and many others do not deserve to be president.
The republicans have been even worse, but the democrats went along. The democrats do not have to go after the president alone. They have had every opportunity to put the congressional republicans on the spot yet they have refused to do so.
It really isnt that hard… to bad the democrats have been pussies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ctlmholr45c
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:28 pmComment by Liberals Heart Terrorists
No one is perfect. Those that refuse to admit to mistakes made are not to be trusted.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:30 pmJake: I think you and I might actually agree on what I said in#84:
Bush never said anything about other attacks around the world, only ‘fighten ‘em over there so they don’t come here’-raise shoulders,gruntgiggle, and wink’-
yes? no?
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:30 pmKucinich: no compromise
U.S. House Democrats appear to have the votes to pass a spending measure today that would fund the war in Iraq but set a time-line for getting out. But Cleveland’s Dennis Kucinich refuses to fold.
“It was wrong four years ago to go to war,” he told reporters today as he exited a Democratic caucus meeting. “It’s wrong today to continue the war.”
Kucinich, who wants to become the country’s next president, is in his party’s minority. Democratic leaders say they’ll never win a vote for immediate withdrawal, so the next best thing is to demand an exit within 18 months. (Even that strategy will be vetoed by President Bush if it ever passes the Senate.)
And so Kucinich refuses to compromise, saying, “We have to get out of Iraq, period.”
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:36 pmwhiteyfresh:
Not exactly, since Bush has expressed our solidarity with allies who have been attacked since 9/11 — and pledged to re-doubled our will to win — unfortunately, for our allies, they don’t have the Atlantic and Pacific oceans as natural buffers : (
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:36 pmThe god dam republicans have been sticking the stupid fu*king noses in everybody’s business for decades. You fu*kers have been planting seeds of hatred for years and years. Well, your crop has now blossomed. The terrorists don’t hate America, they hate you fu*kers.
Oh and to answer your question literally:
The republcains haven’t done anything about the terrorists that attacked us on 9/11. No a dam thing. You started by going after them in Afghanistan, but got side tracked with Bush’s revenge war for profit. Losers.
Clinton tracked down the bastards that bombed the WTC in 1993. Tracked them down and brought them to justice, but he wasn’t president in September of 2001, so I don’t know what your point is. Oh yea, you people are obsessed with Clinton.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:36 pmLiberals Heart Terrorists sez:
Looks like you’ve fully committed to your real role as a parody troll.
Good stuff, LHT. Side-splitting.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:37 pmJake:
“Has there been another attack by terrorists on our shores since 9/11?”
Yes. The Anthrax attacks for one, not to mention the various assaults on our embassies over seas (and yes, that’s still considered American property).
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:39 pmWe all watched these past 6 years as the democrats did not stand up when they had every opportunity to do so.
Comment by ggibson #93
That’s not true gibby on C-Span almost every night there was a YOUNG crop of Democrats…
…I forget what they were called (Kendrick Meeks was one of them)…
…they stood up in the well of the HOUSE railing against the war…
..but were given almost ZERO face time by the MSM…
…and the REPULSIVESCUM shouted them down and thwarted them at EVERY turn…
…Cynthia McKinney, Barbara Lee, Maxine Waters ALL opposed this war and ANY funding for it from DAY 1…
…take your REVISIONIST “HIS”tory and shove it where the sun DON’T SHINE!
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:41 pmYou just thank your glowing man in the sky that you aren’t within arms reach of me.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:43 pmHow much money to fight terrorism went to Spain again? The pork in this bill is what will be whittled away and resent to the President. This is a longer term strategy by the Dems. the current bill will pass the senate and put infront of the president and he can decide not to fund the troops by veto. Then it will come back and the fat will be cut and some numbers changed but the removal will still be there and will go to the president where he can decide again to not fund the troops. All the while the clock is ticking on the current funds. Pitty too much was blown on the profiteers.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:44 pmJake:i can see your point, but didn’t Bush(at least at the beginning of all this) say “We are fighting them over there so they don’t come over here”?
also-how exactly to you ‘redouble’ one’s will? Is that like ‘giving 110%’?
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:44 pmYes, this talking point was debink in November of 2001. When Anthrax was sent to Patrick Leahy, Tom Daschle, Russ Fiengold and Tom Brochav.
I know you fu*kers don’t like this brought up, because 1) it blows your talking point and 2) it was a neocon fascist like you that did it.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:45 pm“They are just jealous of us and people like you are just self-hating, spoiled Americans who should be forced to live like the Islamic militants you spend hours defending.”
Too stupid for words!
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:45 pmggibson
Here is something for you from Wiki..
So there is not Constitutionally required form or format and an AUMF can be construed as a Declaration of War, but it is stretching it.
Spudge,
Cute, very, very cute
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:46 pm#98 Spudge; The republcains haven’t done anything about the terrorists that attacked us on 9/11. No a dam thing.
I have to disagree. According to Seymour Hersh Bush is funding groups with ties to Al Qaida. And he’s doing it perhaps with stolen money and without congressional knowledge.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/03/05/070305fa_fact_hersh
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:47 pmThe anthrax attacks are most likely “in house”. Jake can you shed some light on the anthrax mailings? Or if I used right wing smear tatic questioning it would sound like…….Jake when did you stop mailing the anthrax and will you start it up again?
If I’m on his ignore list could someone else ask him?
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:48 pmbig papa, why are you attacking ggibson for pointing out the truth?
Anytime a Dem WAS in front of a camera, they should have been talking about the illegal war and they didn’t. Anytime they were invited onto Fox, they should have talked about the illegal war, but they didn’t.
They have not stood up and spoke out when it counted. They discounted the Democrats that held the meetings in the well under the Congress. They distanced themselves and didn’t speak up.
And now you are going to attack one of our own for saying so. Come on now. You know he is right and what I just said is right.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:49 pmLiberal Heart Terrorist:
“The notion that anyone is creating terrorists is sick and very misguided.”
Well, I imagine it wouldn’t make much sense to you if your “conclusion” rests on the premise that “terrorists=brown people” – hard to create a brown person except the old fashioned way.
“America is a great country and they should have no reason to hate us.”
They shouldn’t; yet they do – ever wonder why? Well a few Americans and a few more multinationals bully them, treat them like crap, and antagonize them, making the rest of us look bad, all the while they’ve got folks like you at home, majorly misinformed and uneducated who will bend over backwards (and secretly forwards) to defend their actions no matter what.
America is a great country; we just have a few loud, arrogant a$$holes like yourself.
“They are just jealous of us and people like you are just self-hating, spoiled Americans who should be forced to live like the Islamic militants you spend hours defending.”
Show me a link to a single post/thread on this forum where a single one of us has defended “Islamic Militants” there fuxtik.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:49 pmRepublicants seem to conveniently forget when Anthrax put out their last album…oh wait…nevermind…wrong attack.
Seriously, who really follows that line of logic – gee, let’s attack an irrelevant country – that outta stop the terrorists. WTF!
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:52 pmHey, you said for giggles.
But, in reagrds to your comment, while Wikipedia is great for getting information, I don’t hold it up as a resource for legal matters.
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:57 pmComment by hacker bob
Very good… now look up the word “precedent”…
March 23rd, 2007 at 2:58 pm…take your REVISIONIST “HISâ€tory and shove it where the sun DON’T SHINE!
Comment by big papa
You just listed my exact points right back to me… so what are you trying to say?
March 23rd, 2007 at 3:01 pmI need to change my Depends and pop a Geritol.
March 23rd, 2007 at 3:35 pmBut, but, but… Drudge said that “the House was in disarray”.
LOL!
March 23rd, 2007 at 3:42 pmWhen did the repukes start caring about a bill filled with pork?? Oh yeah, sense their sorry asses was voted out of office.
March 23rd, 2007 at 4:43 pmWELL DONE—-CHIMPya IS BUSY CLENCHING HIS SPHINCTER MUSCLES(STRETCHED by Gannon/Guckert)TO BLOW HIS VETO OUT OF HIS FILTHY ANUS!!!!! HAH!!!!!
March 24th, 2007 at 12:18 amGood. But why the heck does everyone call it redeployment?! Redeployment means sending troops back out there.
Stop making it sound like I’m cheering for something that would be a HORRIBLE idea. Or make up a new word.
Thanks!
March 24th, 2007 at 3:12 pm