Think Progress

65 dead in Iraq bombings.

By Nico Pitney on Mar 27th, 2007 at 3:47 pm

65 dead in Iraq bombings.

“Two nearly simultaneous truck bombs — including one detonated by remote control — ripped through markets in Tal Afar on Tuesday, killing at least 48 people and wounding dozens, police said, as violence surged outside the Iraqi capital.” Dozens more were killed in other explosions around the country.

UPDATE: “He can swagger all he wants but we have 3,241 dead Americans.” — Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV), on President Bush’s threat to veto an Iraq war spending bill that includes a timetable for troop withdrawal.



95 Responses to “65 dead in Iraq bombings.”

  1. VerbalKint says:

    Bush is a swaggering drunk.


  2. doro says:

    What the hell did they mean when they talked about the surge?


  3. GSD says:

    Staggeringly incompetent too.

    -GSD

    Impeach Seedy Gonzales.


  4. Jake says:

    How many Americans out of the 65 dead?


  5. And You Thought REAGAN Was Stupid says:

    Consider yourselves “surged.” Somehow, this will be spun as a sign of progress. In fact, I’m sure this is the “last throes” or “we’re turning the corner.”


  6. Exley says:

    “Two nearly simultaneous truck bombs — including one detonated by remote control — ripped through markets in Tal Afar on Tuesday, killing at least 48 people and wounding dozens, police said, as violence surged outside the Iraqi capital.”

    ——-
    Self-defense is what the Iraqi insurgency is doing…
    Comment by Juan C — July 24, 2006 @ 6:32 pm

    I am still unclear as to how blowing up innocent civilians in marketplaces is “self-defense.”


  7. bob (not the hacker) says:

    “How many Americans out of the 65 dead?

    Comment by Jake”

    What is wrong with you? They don’t matter because they’re brown? or are they all terrorists?


  8. Tuber says:

    Breaks my heart. More people dying for a lie and a crusade. We must stop this now. There is no greater moral obligation before us. How many more Iraqis and military personnel need to die for this blood lust?


  9. bluefish says:

    Isn’t it about time for a Republican schill to pop up on TV and let us know that we just need another Friedman before we start seeing the surge take hold?


  10. DM says:

    #4 – Come straight out and make with the relevant argument, don’t just bait.


  11. VerbalKint says:

    What is wrong with you?
    Comment by bob (not the hacker) — March 27, 2007 @ 3:56 pm

    There is a lot wrong with Jake. To begin with, Jake does not believe in the rule of law. He believes in the cult of authoritarian power.


  12. VerbalKint says:

    #4 – Come straight out and make with the relevant argument, don’t just bait.
    Comment by DM — March 27, 2007 @ 3:58 pm

    And, I point out ONCE AGAIN today that Jake starts the thread by trying to change the subject.


  13. Tuber says:

    It seems that for some, a human life is less sacred if it does not have “American” attached to it. If ever you needed a statement to totally discredit a source, that would suffice.

    “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
    - Declaration of Independence


  14. veritas says:

    Heinous & Amoral are two words to describe this misanthrope! Bush’s Reign is drawing to a swift close and impeachment is just around the corner.


  15. RemoveBush says:

    How many Americans out of the 65 dead?

    Comment by Jake — March 27, 2007 @ 3:51 pm

    What does that matter????

    So only American life means anything????

    Also, the “surge” was suppose to be working…. Remember John McCain saying “we walked down the streets of Bahgdad”????

    I would start deciding now what your least horrible fear is so you can request that when you are in HELL!!!! After all, you certainly are not anywhere near being worthy of entering into the kingdom of heavan……


  16. veritas says:

    Could this already be THE LAST THROES OF THE SURGE??


  17. Namtillaku says:

    I have to agree, pretty disgusting comment there Jake. Certainly not very christian.


  18. gummitch says:

    And, I point out ONCE AGAIN today that Jake starts the thread by trying to change the subject.

    Comment by VerbalKint

    And I point out ONCE AGAIN that J**e is well on the way to turning yet another thread into “all about J**e” — responses to him or comments about him.

    Let him wither.


  19. VerbalKint says:

    Tuber, I agree with you that EVERY life lost in Iraq on account of the horrors unleashed by our war criminal president counts equally. The obsessive focus on American lives disgusts me. When I talk about dead, I talk about half a million dead. That’s how much blood Bush and the gang have on their hands.


  20. hellinabucket says:

    shouldn’t the 770+ american contractors that have died in Iraq and Afghanistan since this all began?


  21. ForTruth says:

    I think I finally get it. Bush is using reverse psychology, because he thinks Americans have forgotton what or forefathers faught for. Bush wants to wake everybody back up so they re-take their freedom, yeah thats it.

    /sarspasm


  22. angryvietnamvet says:

    Jake, you are one of those pathological theocrats who wants jesus as king of the u.s. …..Then, why is it that you ask “how many of the dead are american?” as if the death of other innocent fellow humans (for whom, in your mythology jesus died) of no consequence? oh…i forgot, they are muslim therefore the enemy, therefore evil. Don’t these Iraquis get to enjoy the gift of “democracy and freedom” that your lord bushit has blessed them with by invading and occupying their land? What kind of a christofascist are you? I read your postings here and there and I am convinced you are psychotic and have, like so many other mentally deranged, flocked to your christomythology and your biblefictions to try to find some meaning in life….go find it someplace else…..god is dead


  23. keith says:

    BBC says today that Tony Blair’s advisers (including Ministry of Defence) told him that the Johns Hopkins/Lancet study, estimating 655,000 Iraqi deaths as of last July, was robust, balanced, and tried and tested way of measuring mortality in comflict zones.

    For full story:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6495753.stm

    And the Bush administration said we went there to help the Iraqis. (I never believed it.)


  24. Tuber says:

    #19-Verbalkint,

    Very much in agreement. What is horrible is that Bush, his administration, and the warmongers have sprayed that blood across this whole nation so that we are all stained with it and have to walk around in its stench.

    I know that we will bring peace and morality back to this nation. But I will never forget or minimize those that we, the USA, have violated so horrifically. Nor do I think we should ever forget, lest we repeat this heinous mistake again.


  25. Patrick1 says:

    The left celebrating dead people again.


  26. Rebel in CA says:

    Two nearly simultaneous truck bombs …Dozens more were killed in other explosions around the country.

    According to US Comander in Iraq, General Pat.my-ass there is no civil war in Iraq.

    Then please tell me general, who the f*%k detonated these bombs moron?


  27. keith says:

    When we caused the deaths of over three million in Indo-China, that didn’t lead to us not doing it again in the future. It led to us wanting a big “win” to make up for the big “loss”.


  28. Laura Bush says:

    Since they went off nearly simultaneously that only counts as one today…


  29. keith says:

    re: #25

    No, the left is not celebrating death—you are too stupid to realize we are pointing out the horrible result of this unnecessary and illegal invasion and occupation.

    People like you adore killing a large number of “the enemy”.


  30. BuckarooBanzai says:

    #9, a Friedman. lol. Excellent


  31. Rocks911 says:

    Tuber,

    “It seems that for some, a human life is less sacred if it does not have “American” attached to it.”

    Only for the Christ666ian conservatives.


  32. Rodan says:

    Patrick1,
    Yes the Left is happy 65 people dies in Iraq. It helps them politcally and it makes their Al-Qaeda allies look good!

    Rebel in CA
    “Then please tell me general, who the f*%k detonated these bombs moron?”

    You ever heard of Al-Qaeda in Iraq.

    I actually favor leaving Iraq dso the Shiites and Sunnis kill each other. We should leave and let them go at it!
    It’ll be cool to watch!


  33. Chris L says:

    I take it this did not happen in one of the neighborhoods McCain said were safe enough to just walk through.


  34. BuckarooBanzai says:

    Harry should characterize Bush’s actions as a Rope a Dope vs. Swagger. All that he cares about is staying upright for the remainder of his term. Dems need to start landing some serious punches to knock his a** out. Impeach now.


  35. Jake says:

    As Jed Bartlet said on the West Wing (now in syndication) “I don’t know why Americans have to be more valuable to me, but they are.”


  36. Patrick1 says:

    You don’t win a war by dying for your country, you win it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country..George S. Patton, Jr.


  37. Wayne says:

    The left celebrating dead people again.
    Comment by Patrick1

    Patrick1 is letting his brains ooze out with his drooling again.
    Moron.


  38. keith says:

    I know people on the right love killing or the idea of killing—because I have been listening to them for over fifty years. They attack people on the left as being “wussies” for not advocating killing.


  39. keith says:

    There was no Al-Qaeda in Iraq before Bush opened up the country to them by removing Saddam Hussein–their sworn enemy who was strongly suppressing them. Way to go W !


  40. keith says:

    One of my Peeps Johnny Blanco was no joke. He gave some Chinses dude a Buck Fifty once.that’s a slice a croos the face.
    Comment by Rodan — March 24, 2007

    Oh I guess your too busy swallowing Hizb’allah/Al-Qaeda sperm!
    Comment by Rodan — March 24, 2007

    I walked around with a .22 with me. Trust me I used it.
    Comment by Rodan

    I hate Islam! Wipe those savages off the planet!
    Comment by Rodan — March 24, 2007


  41. BuckarooBanzai says:

    As Jed Bartlet said on the West Wing (now in syndication) “I don’t know why Americans have to be more valuable to me, but they are.”

    Comment by Jake — March 27, 2007 @ 4:37 pm

    Good to hear. Then why were we there in the first place? One of the many, many excuses was that the Iraqi’s were suffering oppression from a brutal dictator. So what according to your quote. Also, if that is the case, why does Bush want to spend billions and billions rebuilding Iraq, and New Orleans continues to languish. Last I checked, they were taxpaying American citizens.


  42. Not Canadian says:

    #39
    George W. Bush, liberating terrorists and terrorist organizations Worldwide!!!!!!
    What a douche.


  43. keith says:

    I hate Islam! Wipe those savages off the planet!
    Comment by Rodan — March 24, 2007

    Further proof it is right-wing nuts who like the idea of 655,000 Iraqis dying !


  44. Rodan says:

    keith,
    Al-Qaeda’s there now! I bet you root for them!


  45. keith says:

    It was the Reagan/Bush administration that was selling massive amounts of weapons to the terrorist state of Iran under Ayatollah Khomenhi.

    It was Carter who had sanctions against trading with Saddam. It was the Reagan/Bush administration that immediately removed those sanctions.


  46. Rodan says:

    “Further proof it is right-wing nuts who like the idea of 655,000 Iraqis dying !”

    I wish it was 655 Million dean Islamic savages so you Lefties can whine and moan like Sheep!


  47. Rodan says:

    This is the most Pro-Jihadi site in this I’ve ever seen.
    With Islamo-Apologists supporting Al-Qaeda and Hizb’Allah on this site!


  48. keith says:

    No in fact I was opposed to opening up the country to them as I just said a minute ago. The policies you advocate extremely aided al-Qaeda. Don’t try to read my mind. You do not have that capability.


  49. RemoveBush says:

    Al-Qaeda’s there now! I bet you root for them!

    Comment by Rodan — March 27, 2007 @ 4:52 pm

    Yeah, and they are only their because of the Bush Crime Family!!!!!!

    You seem to think that expanding terrorist networks is a good thing….. Now instead of Afganistan, they are in Iraq…. They have also fled into pakistahn….

    Boy, you just revel in the fact that Bush has created more terrorists don’t you?


  50. Chris L says:

    Al-Qaeda’s there now! I bet you root for them!

    Comment by Rodan — March 27, 2007 @ 4:52 pm

    Question for you, Rodan – Al-Qaeda is Sunni, Iran is a Shia nation who hates the Sunnis. Yet, all the insurgents are supossedly Shiites being supplied by Iran? Bush and Saudi Arabia have both come out in favor of the Sunnis, the same group who were running Iraq under Sadaam. Basically Bush removed Al-Qaeda’s biggest enemy and handed them the country on a silver platter.


  51. keith says:

    It was the Reagan/Bush administration and Pakistan that funded al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. Osama is now in Pakistan. Pakistan does actually have nuclear weapons NOW.

    Have you noticed that Bush is not going after Osama nor Pakistan?

    He went after the OIL instead. Give me a big sheet of paper and a crayon and I will draw you a picture.


  52. Conservatives for satan says:

    The Bush family is evil.


  53. Not Canadian says:

    Hey Rodan,

    Why don’t YOU die now for peace?

    I’ll supply the .30 mm carbine rifles, and you and your Wingnut buddies can play “war” games until your ALL DEAD.


  54. Rodan says:

    Chris L,
    Al-Qaeda and Iran are allies. Bin Laden’s son Sayeed in in Iran under the Protection ofthe Revolutionary Guard Corps. Al-Zawahiri alos has long established ties to Iran.
    I’m not here to defend Bush since I belived he should’ve leveld Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia,Afghanistan, Pakistan and Syria back into the stone Age. Then the Islamo-Fascists couldn’t have gone nowhere!
    But as always you seem to hate Bush more than your enemy.
    Great logic, or is it lack of it!

    As for the creating more terrorists, that’s bogus. Jihad has been around since the 7th Century. I guess the Ro,mans fighting back the Islamic invaders were creating more Jihadis right?


  55. Rocks911 says:

    Rodan,

    Hey tough guy, are you in uniform in Iraq or just another chicken hawk that lets someone else do their dying?


  56. Rodan says:

    I just love it how Leftists like Keith and remove Bush come the defence of their Islamic buddies!
    You guys are so easy to play with. All I have to do is attack Muslims and you guys go at it.
    You guys are the gift that keeps on giving!
    The Left supposrts Islamo-Fascism!


  57. keith says:

    Pakistan also sold nuclear technology to North Korea. Pakistan is also unstable and headed by an un-elected dictator. Pakistan sent large amounts of money to the 9/11 hijackers. None of the 17 were from or connected to Iraq.


  58. keith says:

    According to the 16 intelligence agencies of the USA, Bush’s policies have increased terrorism and harmed the security of the USA.


  59. Rodan says:

    Rocks911,
    Hey bitchass, I seved in the Military for 4 years and have a younger Brother deployed in Iraq.
    As always you Leftist have to resort to the chickehawk argument. A silly nonsensical viewpoint to cover up your support of our enemies.
    I wore a uniform, you didn’t pussy!

    Also my Relatives in Lebanon fought against the Islamic scum of the PLO, Amal militia, Syrian army and Hizb’Allah.
    I’ve alos beatean up Muslims and take joy in it!


  60. keith says:

    You are too stupid to tell the difference between pointing out Bush’s disastrous policies and liking the enemy. I experienced the same thing all during VietNam.


  61. Rodan says:

    Keith,
    I just love how Leftists always defend the rreasoning of the Islamo-Fascists.
    Why did the Muslims in the 7th Century attack The Romans and Persians?
    Did Bush cause that?


  62. RemoveBush says:

    Rodan, I met bacteria that has more brain power than you…….

    Enough said.


  63. keith says:

    I can’t believe I am discussing foreign policy and morality with the self-acclaimed GANGBANGER “RODAN”.


  64. Rodan says:

    Keith,
    Bush’s biggest mistake was not gearing up this country for total war after 9/11. We should’ve built up a 15 Million man Military and destroyed Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Syria.
    We should’ve done it Mongol style and destroy them in such a way that it would’ve taken them centuries to recover!


  65. keith says:

    Hitler was a corporal in WWI, so I guess all the policies he advocated were right.


  66. RemoveBush says:

    “I seved in the Military for 4 years and have a younger Brother deployed in Iraq.

    Comment by Rodan — March 27, 2007 @ 5:10 pm”

    Good! Put that uniform back on and get over there and continue the killing like you are making statements about……

    Get your SORRY ASS over thier!!!! Put that uniform back on and prove your actions by more than words…..

    I doubt I will hear that you have reinlisted though!!!!! Just like the Repubs to provide lip service!!!!

    I’m sure you can go back in…. After all…. All your buddies are advocating that even people who lost limbs should get their asses out of bed and get back to the battlefield…..

    Get your ass back over their if you support what Bush is doing so much. Keep your ass over their until you win the war.


  67. Rodan says:

    What I love is the predictability of the Left’s defense of Islam. That’s your Achilles heel!
    You guys get bent out of shape defending Islamic Savages and keep falling into my traps.
    You guys keep confirming what I know.
    That the Left is aligned with Islam!
    Thank you guys for making my point!


  68. keith says:

    In all your hatred of Islamic fundamentalists—why is none of it directed to Pakistan? They funded Osama, Osama and his men are there now, they funded al-Qaeda, they funded 9/11, they sold nuclear technology to North Korea, they have an unelected dictator, and they have nuclear weapons now. None of these could be said of Iraq prior to our invasion.


  69. Not Canadian says:

    that it would’ve taken them centuries to recover!

    Comment by Rodan

    And centuries of terrorist attacks to come. Why do you WANT them to try and kill us? Why do you hate America? Did life deal you a shitty hand? Was your ONLY option in your pathetic life to join the military? Man, that’s almost a sad story you got there, Mr. Peepants.


  70. bob (not the hacker) says:

    “As Jed Bartlet said on the West Wing (now in syndication) “I don’t know why Americans have to be more valuable to me, but they are.”

    Comment by Jake ”

    I case you don’t know it, that’s a TV show jake. It’s not real. Just like 24 aint real. Wait a minute, I get it now, you’ve moved to supporting a fictional president because he’s more real the the real president we have now.


  71. Not Canadian says:

    Rodan is a sorry tool of the Warmongering Oil business because he actually THINKS this war is about terror and Islam.

    LOL.


  72. Rodan says:

    RemoveBush,
    I wore the uniform, you didn’t. I did try to re-enlist in 2002 but was disqualified.
    At least I had the uniform you didn’t.
    Also I don’t root for the Islamic savages like you!
    Support the enemy is your motto!


  73. keith says:

    You are too stupid to tell the difference between pointing out Bush’s disastrous policies and liking the enemy. I experienced the same thing all during VietNam.


  74. bob (not the hacker) says:

    So you used to be in the military Rodan, why aren’t you still in the military? the chickenhawk argument is vaild moron. it shows the hypocracy of your ilk: you want others to die so you can imagine your 22 is a 45. What you don’t get is that it doesn’t matter if you’re shooting blanks.


  75. Rodan says:

    why is none of it directed to Pakistan?

    Did you read my post? Nope, right!


  76. RemoveBush says:

    “RemoveBush,
    I wore the uniform, you didn’t. I did try to re-enlist in 2002 but was disqualified.
    At least I had the uniform you didn’t.
    Also I don’t root for the Islamic savages like you!
    Support the enemy is your motto!

    Comment by Rodan — March 27, 2007 @ 5:22 pm”

    Hey ASS WIPE!!!!

    Your IDIOTIC, ASSININE, BLANTANT lies are no more evident than your comment…….

    Before you open your mouth and remove all DOUBT, you should know who you are talking to and what thier background is……

    Tell me where you live and I will shove my steel toed MILITARY ISSIUED combat boots up your sorry ass!!!!


  77. Rodan says:

    Not Canadian,
    “And centuries of terrorist attacks to come. ”

    Nope, after they’d be too busy rebuilding. With that comment you prove another aspect of the Left’s alliance with Islam. You guys think they’re invinsible. Kill enoeugh of them and they’ll be scared.


  78. Jake says:

    For the record, I simply asked at post #1 if any Americans were killed — that info was not on the Huffington Post being linked to — I never said I thought an Iraqi life was worth less than an American life. In fact, both are priceless since Jesus died on the Cross for both.


  79. bob (not the hacker) says:

    72
    the military has lowered its standards sinced then, they’re taking felons, morons, and people with missing limbs. are you sure you still don’t qualify?


  80. keith says:

    .
    You think it is a good policy to kill the 1,200,000,000 Muslims in the world !!!
    Gee, I wonder why the Army termed you “disqualified” in 2002? Can’t imagine.


  81. Rodan says:

    Bob,
    I had an injury. At least I served. You didn’t loser. That’s the Left’s biggest baby argument Chickenhawk. You support Islamo-Fascism. Hence you must defen Islam at all costs. Besides if ran into you face to face, we would see who’s the coward.
    Bitch Ass!


  82. keith says:

    Oh I guess your too busy swallowing Hizb’allah/Al-Qaeda sperm!
    Comment by Rodan — March 24, 2007


  83. Rodan says:

    RemoveBush,
    You would end up with a bullet in you quicker than you can get near me.
    You’re a bitchass.
    You’re not no Military dude! You’s a Jihadi supporting traitor!


  84. JesusChrist_GodofWAR says:

    Meanwhile, the Brits agree that the methods used to estimate the number of actual dead Iraqis was indeed accurate and is a “best practice” method for performing this kind of survey.

    [from: http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2396031.ece ]

    British backtrack on Iraq death toll
    By Jill Lawless
    Published: 27 March 2007

    British government officials have backed the methods used by scientists who concluded that more than 600,000 Iraqis have been killed since the invasion, the BBC reported yesterday.

    The Government publicly rejected the findings, published in The Lancet in October. But the BBC said documents obtained under freedom of information legislation showed advisers concluded that the much-criticised study had used sound methods.

    The study, conducted by researchers from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore and the Al Mustansiriya University in Baghdad, estimated that 655,000 more Iraqis had died since March 2003 than one would expect without the war. The study estimated that 601,027 of those deaths were from violence.

    The researchers, reflecting the inherent uncertainties in such extrapolations, said they were 95 per cent certain that the real number of deaths lay somewhere between 392,979 and 942,636.

    The conclusion, based on interviews and not a body count, was disputed by some experts, and rejected by the US and British governments. But the chief scientific adviser to the Ministry of Defence, Roy Anderson, described the methods used in the study as “robust” and “close to best practice”. Another official said it was “a tried and tested way of measuring mortality in conflict zones”.

    So… how many dead citizens in a country that had nothing to do with the events of 9/11 does it take to slake the blood thirst of the ReichWing occupiers of the WhiteHouse?

    ITMFAs now!!!


  85. Rodan says:

    I laugh at you posters getting all worked up defending a People that hate your culture and civilization. This war began in 636 AD at the battle of the Yramulks when Islamic savges defeated the Eastern Roman Army. Of course none of ypou Dhimmis would know that since it’s not taught.
    Read some history and then discuss the Islamic threat!
    Till than thanks for proving my point!
    The Left supports Islamo-Fascism!
    I’ve email to several people some of your posts. You guys keep making this website look bad by providing ammunition to people like me.
    As your Toystore Deskjockey Phoney Journalist ex sportscaster Ulbermahn says:
    Great Thanks!


  86. RemoveBush says:

    Rodant, crawl back into Bush’s ass where you belong……

    Last response to you, since your brain power is BELOW that of an amoeba…

    Enjoy your sorry life you loser!


  87. bob (not the hacker) says:

    re #81

    First off-quote where anyone is “supporting Islmo-Fascism” idiot.
    Second off- so you had splinter like Kerry, put up or shut up.
    Third off-bullys are cowards. you hide behind your bluster because you, and your right wing compatriots, are scared of your shadows. You don’t scare me here and you wouldn’t scare me in person, so drop the act.
    Fourth off-appearently, my joke about you packing a 22 loaded with blanks hit a little too close to home.


  88. bob (not the hacker) says:

    YO JAKE!

    I know I’m on your “ignore list” but you indirectly responded to me a couple of times today so I know you still read posts from the inficlel list. Rodan is one of yours, take a look at what he’s posting here, in the defense of conservatives, republicans, etc. Are you sure you want to be associated with this level of discourse and critical thought?


  89. Rocks911 says:

    Rodan,

    I served, numbnuts!

    Go away with your supposed history lessons, you pick and choose your lessons just like all the rest of the Christ666ian conservatives that export crusades to foreign countries and call it self defense.

    F*ck off


  90. Rocks911 says:

    Rodan,

    By the way asshat, Dubyas Daddy stays with the Bin Ladens when he travels to that part of the world, thats a fact. And you believe all the sh*t them evil manipulative christ666ian conservatives sell you. What a putz.


  91. PoliticalCritic says:

    What’s sad is that 65 dead is a safe day in Iraq. On average, well over 100 people get killed every day.


  92. angryvietnamvet says:

    Rodan, you really have a problem with your masculinity, what with all this anger and violence. You either play too many of those violent video games and have lost a hold on reality or you are gay and repressed and trying to be a macho man. I bet you have a tiny dick.


  93. keith says:

    Unfortunately, it is not 100 people a day, it is closer to 500. Look at #23 and #84.


  94. keith says:

    I think Rodan never got any love as a child and became a sociopath—-our president is similar.


  95. Raymond Funamoto says:

    THAT’S RIGHT, MONKEY-BOY CHIMPYA, CLENCH YA SPHINCTER MUSCLES AND GET READY TO BLOW YA FOUL VETO RIGHT OUT OF YA LOATHESOME ANUS—-JUST THE SAME WAY YA SPOUT EMPTY HOT AIR OUT OF YA MOUTH, SO DO YA SPOUT FOUL POISONOUS STINKING GAS OUT OF YA LOWER MOUTH!!!!! LET THE TOADYS WHO WORSHIP YA GIVE YA THE “OSCULUM INFAME” AND GET THEIR LIPS ALL SMEARED BROWN FROM YA DISGUSTING PUTRESCENCE(i.e., SHIT), EL DIABLO Bush, 666, THE GREAT BEAST AND SPAWN OF SATAN , HIS NIBS HIMSELF!!!!!



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll