Comments on: Doan cracks under tough questioning.

By: sbois

sbois — Sat, 31 Mar 2007 23:14:08 +0000

and what the hell is a black women doing the republic party any as a blk man i disown her dumb ass

By: sbois

sbois — Sat, 31 Mar 2007 23:12:08 +0000

does nt matter that she is black women get her talking i am a black man make that bitch talk and to blogger Ramon Suarez she fucked up no excuses go waxman

By: Doan's Little Pill

Doan's Little Pill — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:09:14 +0000

I have turned over Luritaâ€™s eyeglasses and drinking glass in a plastic bag to the left-wing of the FBI. Hopefully, they will match her fingerprints to bullet casings found in Dallas, 1963.

Ask not what your paranoia can do to you , but what you can do to your paranoia.

Comment by Doan’s Little Pill â€” March 29, 2007 @ 12:29 pm

By: Will

Will — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:44:13 +0000

Racism my ass. She was lying through her teeth at that hearing. I watched it, saw her through the entire thing, and had no idea she was even a black woman, until I googled her. Her body language suggested total deceit, as well and intolerance towards the panel of representatives — PEOPLE WHO REPRESENT THE ENTIRE US NATION, and she seemed to display a total lack of respect for them and the nation.

By: ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus

ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 06:01:13 +0000

Heh! Nice try, VVGFU! I posted the exact language of the statute and you completely misread and misunderstood it. But I was happy to correct your mistake, junior. Comment by Exley â€” March 28, 2007 @ 10:56 pm

Or you misrepresented, and posted out of context points. But I was happy to correct your mistake, junior. You’re a obnoxious little piece of sh*t, aren’t you junior?

By: Lora

Lora — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:38:41 +0000

I think it horrible how these white Congressmen are coming down hard on this woman. They just hate the fact that a black female can have some power in DC. Waxman and the rest of the Dems are RACIST for attacking her.
Comment by Ramon Suarez â€” March 28, 2007 @ 3:39 pm

Okay, Ramon, what about the firing of the even darker-skinned Bunnatine Greenhouse by this administration after she did her job and complained about the irregularities in awarding no-bid contracts to Halliburton?
To provide you with some food for thought, I have taken the following from wikipedia:
`A long-time government employee, Greenhouse was hired by Lieutenant General Joe Ballard in 1997 to oversee contracts at the Army Corps of Engineers. After Ballard retired in 2000, Greenhouse’s performance reviews, which had been exemplary throughout her public career, suddenly soured. Greenhouse filed an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) complaint alleging race and gender discrimination, which her attorney states has never been investigated. In August 2005, she was demoted in what her lawyer called an “obvious reprisal” for her revelations about the Halliburton contracts.’

The light-skinned Lurita Doan wasn’t severely questioned because of her race but because her memory seems to have been blackened out!

By: John Ebert

John Ebert — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:05:12 +0000

Absolutely despicable. Blatent liar. This woman will eventually go down in flames with the rest of this pathetic administration. Kudos to Rep. Braley. He’d do Perry Mason proud!

By: Raymond Funamoto

Raymond Funamoto — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 03:34:44 +0000

Doan YOU FRET NOW, Lurita, THE MEN IN THE WHITE COATS ARE COMING FOR YA NOW!!!!! YOU’LL SOON BE ABLE TO RELAX IN YOUR PADDED CELL AND WEAVE LOTS AND LOTS OF LITTLE BASKETS….HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH!!!!!!

By: Exley

Exley — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:56:41 +0000

Heh! Nice try, VVGFU! I posted the exact language of the statute and you completely misread and misunderstood it. But I was happy to correct your mistake, junior.

By: ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus

ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:27:08 +0000

Are you referring to the discussion of the Hatch Act on the other thread in which you completely misread and misunderstood the wording of the statute and I had to correct youâ€¦again.
Is that to what you are referring?
Comment by Exley â€” March 28, 2007 @ 4:29 pm

BAHAHAHA, ironic coming from *you*!!!! You posted content, I responded to your content. Don’t blame me because you incorrectly posted information out of context. That’s your fault – incompetent boy!

By: Marie

Marie — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:00:33 +0000

I saw the video, and I didn’t even realize she is black, but I wasn’t looking for that.

By: Marie

Marie — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:59:31 +0000

I can’t believe the Repugs here who think that the Dems are hard on Doan because she’s a black woman!!
Of all groups who disrespect not only women, but blacks as well, that is the height of hypocrisy from a repug.
Dems are hard on people who are corrupt – it makes no difference which gender or color — unlike Repugs who circle the wagons around one of their own party regardless of the criminality involved.

By: ForTruth

ForTruth — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:00:52 +0000

For all intents and purposes, she is white.

By: Exley

Exley — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:29:38 +0000

VVGFU,

Are you referring to the discussion of the Hatch Act on the other thread in which you completely misread and misunderstood the wording of the statute and I had to correct you…again.

Is that to what you are referring?

By: Suzee

Suzee — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:10:25 +0000

It was great to see the Republicans lose their cool-at that hearing. but Henry Waxman put them in their place like he laways does. Bravo Henry!!!!!!!!

By: Spudge_Boy

Spudge_Boy — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:06:43 +0000

I think it horrible how these white Congressmen are coming down hard on this woman. They just hate the fact that a black female can have some power in DC. Waxman and the rest of the Dems are RACIST for attacking her.

Comment by Ramon Suarez â€” March 28, 2007 @ 3:39 pm

So, now coming down on somebody hard is racism. Wow, talk about allowing political correctness getting out of hand. Give me a friggin’ break.

You people are only sensitive when it is one of you on the witness stand.

By: tom baker

tom baker — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:49:07 +0000

yes, poor, poor Ms Doan……the ardor and candor of her inquisitors may result in a case of the vapors….oh my, oh my……

that poor poor dear – maybe she should’ve considered the consequences of whoring out her job to do the dirty work of the dirty pigs in the RNC!!!!!!

she can do her time in the regular lockup, for all i care.

By: ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus

ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:48:16 +0000

Well, I was not quite that absolute in my pronouncement. I merely said that given the language of Section 7324 of the Hatch Act, it appeared at first glance she did nothing improper. Comment by Exley â€” March 28, 2007 @ 3:06 pm

Actually you *did* pronounce, but you gave yourself weasel room as is often the case. Then again, what else should we expect from a GOP weasel?

By: Ramon Suarez

Ramon Suarez — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:39:48 +0000

By: hellinabucket

hellinabucket — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:21:17 +0000

At first glance isn’t the rationale to back a person Exley. Innocent until proven guilty is the law of the land and she hasn’t been proven guilty of anything as of now. I wouldn’t put money on it though.