100+ dead in Baghdad suicide bombings.
By on Mar 29th, 2007 at 1:59 pm
100+ dead in Baghdad suicide bombings.
“Multiple suicide bombers struck in predominantly Shiite markets in Baghdad and in a town north of the capital, killing at least 104 people and wounding scores on Thursday – the day that new U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker took office.”
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
How many were American (the link does not say)?
March 29th, 2007 at 2:09 pmYeah, but that was in one of the unsafe neighborhoods. In the safe neighborhoods McCain went strolling along without his armor.
And always remember: blowing up brown people doesn’t count.
March 29th, 2007 at 2:11 pmLive by the bomb, DIE by the bomb, you lazy iraqi bums. Defend your OWN country. SUPPORT THE TROOPS!
March 29th, 2007 at 2:11 pm“Live by the bomb, DIE by the bomb”
I could not agree more. Get your affairs in order RN, because here it comes.
(and no, I don’t mean the “affair” with your mother)
March 29th, 2007 at 2:17 pmBut, but the surge is working.
How many were American (the link does not say)?
Comment by Jake — March 29, 2007 @ 2:09 pm
What difference does it make?
March 29th, 2007 at 2:20 pmLibStl:
Answer my question from the other thread, and I will return the same courtesy here.
March 29th, 2007 at 2:25 pmplease, just ignore jake. he’s just a waste of energy. nothing he says ever makes sense.
March 29th, 2007 at 2:27 pmWow, that “surge” really is “working”!
/sarcasm
March 29th, 2007 at 2:31 pmHow many were American (the link does not say)?
Comment by Jake — March 29, 2007 @ 2:09 pm
Jake, I have left you alone up until now.
IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW MANY WERE AMERICANS.
now, go away
March 29th, 2007 at 2:34 pmAh, the USA strategery to spread freedom. And body parts.
March 29th, 2007 at 2:36 pmAnswer my question from the other thread, and I will return the same courtesy here.
Comment by Jake — March 29, 2007 @ 2:25 pm
Like you ever answer any questions.
March 29th, 2007 at 2:36 pmNo thanks, hacker bob.
March 29th, 2007 at 2:37 pmI heard they were going to wait until US soldiers left. Aren’t they supposed to circle a date on their calendars and wait?
March 29th, 2007 at 2:39 pmI guess that’s not the neighborhood John McCain had in mind!
March 29th, 2007 at 2:43 pmJake sez:
Don’t believe it, Libstl. Jake tried to claim that the reason I’m on his infantile ‘ignore list’ is because I failed to answer a question he asked…problem is, the question he referred to doesn’t exist.
Jake’s real reason for placing me on The List â„¢ is because I asked him a question he was incapable of answering…and I’d wager the same reason applies to just about everyone else on The List â„¢.
To sum up, Jake’s a liar and a fraud, and not worth engaging in serious debate (although debunking his ludicrous talking points is still amusing).
March 29th, 2007 at 2:45 pmGee. is this the improvements Senator McCain was referring to?
If so, iI hope its not going to get too much better.
March 29th, 2007 at 2:46 pmJake,
Thousands of Americans will die this year in AMERICA due to lack of health care, how do you feel about that? These include babies from mothers who just can’t afford good pre-natal care.
Thousands more Americans lives will be ruined by taking on massive debts from someone in their family becoming ill, and they cannot afford the medical care they do get.
Stick that up your arse and smoke it!
March 29th, 2007 at 2:47 pmHow many were American (the link does not say)?
Comment by Jerk — March 29, 2007 @ 2:09 pm
Well we know of one American who unfortunately was not included.
You.
March 29th, 2007 at 2:48 pmDid they all go off at about the same time? If they did then it only counts as one bombing.
March 29th, 2007 at 2:51 pmTell me #1 is the fake Jake. Please tell me….
March 29th, 2007 at 2:54 pmLibStl:
In case you are wondering if the question to you exists, here it is again: “How many Americans have been killed by terrorists in Afghanistan?”
Comment by Jake — March 29, 2007 @ 12:40 pm
March 29th, 2007 at 2:54 pmOn the “Senate Passes Iraq Withdrawal” thread below (the one where I answered every question you had ; )
Comment by TripMaster Monkey — March 29, 2007 @ 2:45 pm
Thanks for that. I don’t plan on playing his games anymore. I’ll still call him on his bullsh*t, but that’s it. These issues are too important to play silly games of “I’ll tell you mine if you tell me yours.”
March 29th, 2007 at 2:58 pmIraq war anniversary: Your views
The doctrine of pre-emptive military action endorsed by the Bush administration is very dangerous and cannot be condoned. You cannot just go bombing a country because of loose intelligence based on hearsay or because you feel threatened when there is no real and/or imminenet threat. This is the law of the jungle and it cannot be acceptable in a civilised world.
Iceman_UK, London, United Kingdom
I am amazed at how many people on this website support or try to justify America’s crimes against humanity. Where is morality, truth and justice in this day and age? The extreme capitalists and pro-war lobby seem to be happy to do anything including killing innocents to achieve their goals. I am disgusted at humanity.
Shafiq, Dhaka, Bangladesh
The USA must get out of Iraq. We’ve done enough to those people. They did nothing to us. This country (USA) was built on blood, lies and deceit and I don’t want to be here when Karma comes home. We owe the Iraqis so very much. Some big money would help them recover and possibly splitting the country back into the 3 groups that live there. Bless us all.
littledi2, Guthrie, USA
The Iraq war is going as planned. Bush and cabal need the complete collapse and destruction of Iraqi society and subjugate those left after the ‘occupation’ in over to control the country at all levels, including oil. The war on terror is a pretext to carry out all these atrocities. Oil control is the objective and always will be the objective for the USA. The US congress has passed a mediocre bill that does not fulfill the objectives to end the occupation; on the contrary, it provides Bush the opportunity to continue the rape of Iraq. The only beneficiary of this chaos is Israel by maintaining a military and economic supremacy in the region.
gakabani, Iowa City, USA
March 29th, 2007 at 3:02 pmNo civil war here, move on.
March 29th, 2007 at 3:06 pmJake:
In case you were wondering if the question toyou exists, here it is again: “How exactly will forcing White House advisors to testify under oath impair the President’s ability to receive effective advice…unless you’re including advice to commit crimes within that range?”
Comment by TripMaster Monkey — March 22, 2007 @ 2:24 pm
From the “Senate-judiciary-committee-authorizes-subpoenas” thread below (the one where you refused to answer my question, then claimed that you had answered it, but your response was deleted, then you refused to repost the answer you claimed to have originally written). ^_^
March 29th, 2007 at 3:06 pmThis is war. People die. How many died in World War II?
Just because some people are dying doesn’t mean we can’t win. Bill O’Reilly said the surge is working. So did Sean Hannity. I believe their word over slanted AP reports.
March 29th, 2007 at 3:07 pmIf anyone else has questions about “silly games” of common courtesy during a civil debate, let me know then. You know where to find me : )
March 29th, 2007 at 3:08 pmYou know where to find me : )
Comment by Joke — March 29, 2007 @ 3:08 pm
Under my toilet seat lid?
March 29th, 2007 at 3:13 pmBill O’Reilly said the surge is working. So did Sean Hannity. I believe their word over slanted AP reports.
Comment by firehead — March 29, 2007 @ 3:07 pm
LMAO.
So were your siblings likewise inbred, or did mom and dad stop with you?
March 29th, 2007 at 3:16 pmIf anyone else has questions about “silly games†of common courtesy during a civil debate, let me know then. You know where to find me : ) Comment by Jake — March 29, 2007 @ 3:08 pm
You having a “civil-debate”? That’s not possible for a *child* like you – son. Eat some more Cheetohs, and get back on that PS3 – dweeb.
March 29th, 2007 at 3:16 pmJake-
You are playing games. You were playing a numbers game in the other thread and you’re playing one here.
And no, you did not answer all my questions…at least not adequately. I wanted to know how many terrorists were killing Americans in Iraq. You gave me an estimate that may or may not be correct. I wanted to know how many Americans terrorists killed in Iraq, and you never even attempted to answer that one.
You’re playing a game of numbers and symantics, and I believe that a “civil debate” on Iraq should rise above both and stick to the issue…the real issue. The real issue is that we are not safer because of the Iraq war no matter how many terrorists are “over there.”
Civil debate. Whatever.
March 29th, 2007 at 3:22 pmBut … But … But … Joe Lieberman just said that things are looking up in Iraq, and McCain said that there were many safe neighborhoods in Baghdad.
March 29th, 2007 at 3:26 pmHow many of the dead were human beings, Jake?
March 29th, 2007 at 3:28 pmAnyone (NOT on the “Ignore List”) have questions? If so, I’ll be over on the Sampson threads.
March 29th, 2007 at 3:30 pmIt was fun for a while Jake, but you have made no valid arguments that we are safer here because of what’s happening “over there.” I may choose to engage you if you can, but I won’t hold my breath. Take care.
March 29th, 2007 at 3:30 pmLibStl sez:
…to which Jake sez:
Looks like you’ve made The List â„¢, LibStl…congrats. ^_^
March 29th, 2007 at 3:35 pmLooks like you’ve made The List ™, LibStl…congrats. ^_^
Comment by TripMaster Monkey — March 29, 2007 @ 3:35 pm
And on my first day posting too. I feel so honored.
March 29th, 2007 at 3:43 pmFor the record, the only way to get on the “Ignore List” is to refuse to answer my questions even though I’ve answered all of your questions, resort to personal attacks against me when I don’t against you, or ask (there’s no “form” to fill out or any other requirements other than what I call Common Courtesy — if you refuse to answer my questions, for instance, why should I waste me time with that?).
March 29th, 2007 at 3:46 pmHey I got an idea.
Why don’t we just broadcast that video of Karl Rove last night doing his gorilla dance on every tv set in Iraq?
Just play it over and over till they either drift into coma’s or their heads explode.
Then, we go in and grab the oil.
:|
Or would that classify as a weapon of ASS destruction?
March 29th, 2007 at 3:53 pmComment by Jake — March 29, 2007 @ 3:46 pm
No one’s buying it, Shakey…not even the ‘lurkers’ that are your ‘chosen audience’.
For God’s sake, Jake, just go. Watching you get humiliated on a daily basis isn’t even fun anymore…it’s just sad and pathetic.
March 29th, 2007 at 3:55 pmThe way to get on Jakes ignore list is to clean his clock in a debate.
He then just “ignores” you, so he doesn’t have to face you again.
THATS how you get on Jake the Jackass’s ignore list.
March 29th, 2007 at 3:55 pmIs there a form that I need to fill out to get on the ignore list?
Why are the trolls now waging a war on civility and common courtesy?
Isn’t their war on common sense enough? If they had half the success
March 29th, 2007 at 4:03 pmkillin’ the terrorists, as they have had squashing common sense, Jake could move out from under his bed. Maybe go outside and sniff a freakin’ flower or something… chase a bumble bee…
For the record, calling me a “Jackass” qualifies as a “personal attack” and since alp3 cannot read the words “there’s no form to fill out”, he / she was added to the “Ignore List” right after shane. If anyone ELSE has any questions, let me know.
March 29th, 2007 at 4:10 pmJake, two simple questions for you:
1) Why does it matter how many killed were Americans?
2) Are American lives more valuable than Iraqi lives?
I think those were simple enough. As I am not on the ignore list, I will await your response.
March 29th, 2007 at 4:16 pmFirehead- your stupidity grows with each passing day. Do you realize how absolutely moronic you sound when you say “Sean Hannity said so”? Sean Hannity is a shill for the admin. and stands to look like a huge jack ass when this all goes sour. Oops, it already went sour. Keep putting your head down and running into that brick wall and hopefully you’ll knock your dumbass self out.
If I have to point out the differences in WWII and the Iraq occupation, you better pack a lunch, numbnuts.
March 29th, 2007 at 4:18 pmJake- I know this has been said a thousand times in a thousand ways but,
NO ONE GIVES A FLYING F*CK ABOUT YOUR STUPID LIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
March 29th, 2007 at 4:20 pm#46 Jake is going to be talking to himself soon. That is ok, though. I am sure he is used to it. I would love to see the debates between his Catholic personality and his Southern Baptist personality.
March 29th, 2007 at 4:24 pmJPark, don’t forget about his Korean War Vet personality.
March 29th, 2007 at 4:31 pmhacker bob:
1) it matters because the number of Americans killed is being used for propoganda (sp?) purposes by the libs; and
2) that’s not a simple question. From the viewpoint of the President of the United States, of course American lives are more important. From the viewpoint of Jesus Christ’s sacrifice on the Cross, each life is precious. Collateral damage has unfortunately happened in EVERY major war.
March 29th, 2007 at 4:35 pmP.S. to anyone (NOT on the “Ignore Listâ€) who doesn’t understand my comments “For the record” above may appear to be prompted by idiotic comments from those on the “Ignore List” but in no shape or form are intended to be actual responses to said persons, real or fictional. We now return to your regularly scheduled pogrom.
March 29th, 2007 at 4:36 pm#50 You know your spamming, don’t you? That is grounds for banning.
March 29th, 2007 at 4:41 pm1) it matters because the number of Americans killed is being used for propoganda (sp?) purposes by the libs; and Comment by Jake — March 29, 2007 @ 4:35 pm
The *truth* is propaganda? You’re an idiot.
2) that’s not a simple question. From the viewpoint of the President of the United States, of course American lives are more important. From the viewpoint of Jesus Christ’s sacrifice on the Cross, each life is precious. Collateral damage has unfortunately happened in EVERY major war. Comment by Jake — March 29, 2007 @ 4:35 pm
American lives are *more* important? You’re a sick, “UNChrististian” piece of sh*t!
March 29th, 2007 at 4:51 pmP.S. to anyone (NOT on the “Ignore Listâ€) who doesn’t understand my comments “For the record†above may appear to be prompted by idiotic comments from those on the “Ignore List†but in no shape or form are intended to be actual responses to said persons, real or fictional. We now return to your regularly scheduled pogrom. Comment by Jake — March 29, 2007 @ 4:36 pm
P.S. to anyone that doesn’t know Jake’Off’s useless babbling. He can’t handle criticism, so he *pretends* to ignore anyone that shows him what an ignorant, partisan piece of sh*t he is. He actually believes people *care* what he says – bahahah, what an IDIOT!!!
When you get out of your *diapers* Jake, you’ll realize what a fool you look like!
March 29th, 2007 at 4:52 pmTYPICAL SOCIOPATHIC troll SCUM—-I PERSONALLY DON’T CARE IF THE GUILTY INCITERS GET KILLED BUT WHEN INNOCENT BYSTANDERS GET KILLED, AND MOST OF THOSE WHO GET KILLED, ARE EXACTLY THAT, THAT IS ANOTHER STORY ALTOGETHER—-HOW WOULD YOU trolls LIKE IT IF MONKEY BOY CHIMPya BOMBED YA FAMILIES AND SAID—-OOPS, SORRY, BUT THAT IS ONE OF THE SACRIFICES YA MUST MAKE FOR YA COUNTRY? HMMMMMMMMMMM? WOULDN’T FEEL AS GOOD, WOULD YA trolls??????
March 29th, 2007 at 4:57 pmJake,
I would respond to your answer, but ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus took care of it for me.
March 29th, 2007 at 5:07 pmNo problem, hacker bob. Have a nice life.
March 29th, 2007 at 5:16 pmFor the record, calling me a “Jackass†qualifies as a “personal attackâ€
Comment by Jake — March 29, 2007 @ 4:10 pm
Jackass
March 29th, 2007 at 6:44 pmFor the record, calling me a “Jackass†qualifies as a “personal attackâ€
Comment by Jake — March 29, 2007 @ 4:10 pm
Jackass. The midget one.
March 30th, 2007 at 7:07 am