I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

But Rove isn’t out of jeopardy yet, and the revelations of his involvement may yet bite him on the ass, thanks to the Libby conviction. For the Libby conviction gives the Wilsons enormous leverage in their civil suit: they can make the case that it was a concerted effort on the part of White House functionaries, both in the VP’s office, and upstairs. The civil suit has a much lower standard for proof, as I’m sure you’re well aware, and anything brought out in congressional testimony is fair game, as well. I believe that is the reason we’re seeing so many bad memories suddenly appearing in so many upper-echelon officials: they know the Wilsons’ lawyer is just sitting back, taking notes.

Jake, Patrick, I haven’t had a chance to watch the hearing, but don’t worry. AG Gonzales did nothing wrong. He can randomly hire and fire to his discretion. If anything, what former President Clinton did was even more serious than this issue, and Clinton wasn’t impeached. No worries, gentlemen. The democrats are harming themselves for the upcoming 2008 election year.

Comment by Daryll

He probably could get away with “randomly” hiring and firing “to his discretion.”

The issue is that it appears that the firing (and at least one of the hires) was *not* random, but appears to have been motivated by a partisan desire to obstruct justice in on-going investigations of republican corruption, which could also lead to charges of abuse of power. That’s why this is being investigated and questions are being asked.

These are the same sorts of allegations that were being made against nixon after the saturday night massacre, and which formed the basis of the articles of impeachment drafted against him.

And if you question the validity of those article, you can find the same allegations in the articles voted against clinton.

As far as “what former President Clinton did” being “even more serious than this issue”–I assume you are talking about his replacement of all the US attorneys at the time he entered office in Jan ‘93. I can only assume you are ignorant, as it has been well established that incoming administrations routinely replace all US attorneys, as they are political appointments. Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, and bush II all did the same thing.

What sets apart what the current administration has done from the prior cases of inter-administration replacement is that the firing of these 8 USA’s 1) appears to have been done deliberately at the expense of ongoing investigations to benefit the party in power, and 2) has resulted in false testimony on the subject under oath by the officials involved.

But go ahead, keep whistling past the graveyard.

This is the way those 30%ers form an opinion: by refusing to look at the evidence and sticking to their beliefs instead.

Such is the nature of their “informed” opinion.

Loser. How do you know. Because Big Daddy Rove said so. Nice of you boys to bend over so willingly so the Administration can stick it to you without any effort.
Got enough KY Jelly?

Comment by Jake — March 29, 2007 @ 5:32 pm

DON’T YOU DARE chastise anybody here you impotent, unwelcome troll! If you don’t like our treatment of you go to a site where the last few people who believe the crap you believe post.

Comment by CoffinsDrapedWithFlags — March 29, 2007 @ 5:01 pm

I thought we had irrefutable evidence that Jake’s “office” is under Rove’s desk. Isn’t that what he really gets paid for, just like Jeff Gannon.

Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — March 29, 2007 @ 5:00 pm

Oooh you poor thing, makes you want to go take a shower doesn’t it? Interesting though how he ignores you and then reads and saves everything you post about him. Jake the Stalker lives.

Comment by WaltTheMan — March 29, 2007 @ 6:14 pm

Well I certainly have.

And he still won’t put me on the damned list.

Fake Jake is something real Jake uses for his explanation when he gets caught in one of his plentiful lies.

One day he’s a lawyer, next day a doctor. One day he’s a Baptist, next day a Catholic. And he’s supposedly always Independent but clearly that’s the biggest lie he tells.

He puts us all on his list so he doesn’t have to address the myriad of discrepancies in his arguments.

I know we’re supposed to be Progressive here but is it really necessary to allow those 30% of the American people who can’t admit how incredibly stupid they’ve been about Bush to have a voice here. After all, we’re not allowed to post on any Conservative blog.
At the very least could you keep their posts to a representative 30% as opposed to threads like this where they take up 75%.

Jake, just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not really out to get you.

BOO