Comments on: Video: Doan is ‘totally paranoid!’

By: Rum, Romanism and Rebellion » Blog Archive » Make a Joke and I Will Sigh and You Will Laugh and I Will Cry

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:05:12 +0000

[...] out this video of General Services Administration official Lurita Doan, captured after her testimony in front of [...]

By: H

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:53:28 +0000

I am sorry, did I or did I not just see Doan Steal Goverment Property?

By: H

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:52:24 +0000

I am sorry, but did I not just see Doan still ” Goverment Property”.

By: Raymond Funamoto

Raymond Funamoto — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:27:39 +0000

“ALL RIGHT, Lurita, THAT’S ENOUGH BASKETS YOU’VE WEAVED ALREADY!!!!! JESUS, THOSE F*CKING BASKETS ARE OVERFLOWING OUT OF Doan’s PADDED CELL!!!!!” EXPOSTULATED THE WHITE-SUITED GUARD OUTSIDE Lurita Doan’s ASYLUM CELL!!!!!

By: Zooey

Zooey — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:06:18 +0000

Probably she was affraid of the CSI guys who can determine if a person has the Mad Cow mental illness thanks to a saliva sampleâ€¦
Comment by Evil Spaniard

I think she’s right to worry — I imagine they’d find what they were looking for. :)

By: Evil Spaniard

Evil Spaniard — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:14:20 +0000

Probably she was affraid of the CSI guys who can determine if a person has the Mad Cow mental illness thanks to a saliva sample…

By: MEB

MEB — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:07:48 +0000

Don’t worry. As a federal employee, she has already been fingerprinted.

By: Willy

Willy — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:41:08 +0000

Dishonesty = paranoia
Honesty = a cakewalk

It’s your choice, Doan.

By: Doan's Little Pill

Doan's Little Pill — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:29:37 +0000

I have turned over Lurita’s eyeglasses and drinking glass in a plastic bag to the left-wing of the FBI. Hopefully, they will match her fingerprints to bullet casings found in Dallas, 1963.

Ask not what your paranoia can do to you , but what you can do to your paranoia.

By: Litz

Litz — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:28:05 +0000

Excuse me, but shouldn’t her fingerprints already be on file? Years ago I worked for a federal agency–in resource management, mind you, nothing to do with security–and still I had to submit to a full FBI background check, which included fingerprinting. I thought that was part of a government job. And if she doesn’t want to leave her fingerprints behind, then why not? What has she been doing? Stealing? Killing people? If you’ve done nothing wrong, then what’s the big deal! I mean, isn’t that what conservatives always say when liberals don’t want the NSA snooping into people’s phone records and whatnot?

By: Kate Henry

Kate Henry — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:17:21 +0000

She has a reason to feel paranoid. It’s a whole lot harder to tell a lie than it is to tell the truth. If you tell lies, you have to remember your lies so you won’t slip up. That will make anyone paranoid.

By: DitchMitch08

DitchMitch08 — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:56:18 +0000

Doan’s behavior during her testimony yesterday was the most obnoxious and arrogant I have ever seen before a Congressional Committee. She acted like a spoiled child — rude, interrupting, refusing to answer, and making a joke of serious issues. This woman is on our payroll. How do we get her fired?

We know about how Bush destroyed FEMA, the EPA, and God knows how many other agencies. Now we know the GSA is a breeding ground for Bush / GOP political activities.

“Nice job, Doanie”

By: Rajeev Vashisht

Rajeev Vashisht — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:40:11 +0000

Ground Business is different every where.

http://www.tekno-world.blogspot.com

By: loretta

loretta — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:30:30 +0000

now this nutcase knows how I’ve been felling during 6+ years of Bush rule.

By: -epm

-epm — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:26:39 +0000

I’m sure Doan was as serious as a Cheney hunting trip…

When you’re part of an overbearing, super-secret, totalitarian regime who traffics in personal attacks, dirty tricks and character assassination, you start believing everyone else operates that way as well.

By: ardee

ardee — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:16:57 +0000

paranoia implies underlying guilt…

By: Mark

Mark — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:14:04 +0000

#17 are you refering to the endless whitewater eharings? Al in alll I too am infavor of smaller government, but more importantly I am in favor of competant government that makkes decisions based on what isbest for our country, not based on what is best for on political party. Especially when that party is a near total failure.

By: lw

lw — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:09:08 +0000

“This is why I am for smaller government.”

I’m for efficient and effective government. Not too small to be effective. Not too large to be efficient.

By: hellinabucket

hellinabucket — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:04:55 +0000

Cynicon, How outraged were you at Kenneth Starr?

Stole a glass. That’s a good one Steve

By: Robert

Robert — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:00:09 +0000

Theft of Congressional Tableware!!!