Comments on: Waxman Reveals New Evidence Showing White House Use Of Political E-mail Accounts

By: ordering checks

ordering checks — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:06:29 +0000

ordering checks

I found your post comments while searching Google. Very relevant especially as this is not an issue which a lot of peaople are conversant with.

By: Patrick Henry

Patrick Henry — Mon, 02 Apr 2007 00:21:01 +0000

I think we need to reenlist good ole Patrick Fitzgerald here to investigate this little AG problem. Though he works for the fool I trust him to get to the bottom of this little problem. Seems he has a personal stake too now in pulling this rock up so all the critters can scramble when they see light.

By: Zach Edwards

Zach Edwards — Sat, 31 Mar 2007 03:06:34 +0000

The Justice Department officials who were selected to be interviewed hit merely the tip of this iceberg. It is extremely important that the House and Senate Judiciary Committee’s interview John Nowacki, Principal Deputy Director as well as the Acting Counsel to the Director in the Executive Office of the Justice Department, in order to establish the links between the Justice Department officials, the US Attorney’s in the field, and the political operatives who helped remove the targeted US Attorney’s. I have gathered and organized every document released so far from the Justice Department relating to John Nowacki as well as background information on his relationship with the Federalist Society. You will be shocked at how many key pieces of information he gives to Paul McNulty, William Moschella, Michael Elston, William Mercer, Monica Goodling, and former employees Michael Battle and Kyle Sampson.
This story on John Nowacki, including updates, can be found at: http://misterapologist.blogspot.com/

By: dixie blood

dixie blood — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 23:55:07 +0000

What’s the problem? Are we out of handcuffs?? What’s up?

Just start arresting people for gawds sake!!!!

By: Former Rove aide asked to testify « Later On

Former Rove aide asked to testify « Later On — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:33:47 +0000

[...] National Committee. Ralston used such outside accounts when corresponding with Abramoff, even writing to him once, â€œI now have an RNC blackberry which you can use to e-mail me at any time. No security [...]

By: D Jones

D Jones — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:32:19 +0000

Hey JAKE…

We’re certain that Bill “O”, Mr Hannity, Ms Coulter, “Rush”, and Fox would be going insane if this had been the Dems.. and it’s actually TELLING that YOU say;

good luck before the ROBERTS Supreme Court though

THIS is exactly why this information is essential. Even Roberts and Alieto WILL give in and not support their “home boy” (let’s duck hunt for two weeks, and then I’ll vote to DENY access to the “Energy Policy Board” makeup) “Big Tony” Scalia. They understand that WHEN (not if) the political winds change and they keep making the executive THE power in the US that THEY will all be out of a job…because they’ll get defunded by Congress, or impeached by a “Dem” friendly Senate (with the support of the same kind of “politicized” DOJ that we are beginning to understand is in place NOW. Good ole Kyle…anyone wonder about the timing of the “additional language” inserted into the Patriot Act that allowed these kind of appointments to take place in the first place? Mr Hatch, from Utah, had them inserted “outside of the conference commitees”. This would allow the US Attornyss to be appointed without “oversite” when the Congress was “not in session”. The firings took place on 7 December, when the Congress was NOT in session. Who did Kyle work for when he came to Washington…well Mr HAtch…of course. Who was Kyles “friend” and colleague in law school…well The Vice Presidents daughter of course…but THIS IS ALL COINCIDENCE!!! Right!!

By: Feloneous Cat

Feloneous Cat — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:27:18 +0000

SECURITY

Isn’t that the big word for Republicans? We are going to keep you secure? Homeland Security?

So what do these morons do? Use insecure email systems. Text messaging. Maybe we ought to run the Pentagon this way too? After all, the Commander in Chief is doing it!

To me this is the greatest breach in National Security in a long time. Worse, it was perpetrated by the people who are too stupid to understand that the internet is not a secure system.

What other information was transmitted? Has the White House violated National Security purely just to avoid a record of their actions? We may never know until it is too late.

Rove is no genius. He is an idiot. And he may have committed crimes far worse than the leaking the name of Valerie Plame.

Feloneous

By: janedoe

janedoe — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:16:15 +0000

SCOTUS won’t reach the issue of whether the substance of the communications is covered by the privilege because it has already been determined that correspondence to and from political committees is not privileged.

By: gotaclue

gotaclue — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:12:06 +0000

Ooopsie! There goes the ole executive privilege claim!

HAHA

does the phrase “hoist by their own petard” mean anything?

The best part of it all: The Supremes won’t have to rule “for” or “against” Chimpus Maximus on the issue…they never need reach the issue of “executive privilege” except to say that it does not apply to non-official extra-executive branch correspondence. The Court will never have to reach the finer point of deciding whether the particular CONTENT is subject to executive privilege, nor will SCOTUS need to define the doctrine any further.

HAHAHA

This will be fun.. … Popcorn anyone?

By: gitaclue

gitaclue — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:01:27 +0000

Ooopsie! There goes the ole executive privilege claim!

HAHA

does the phrase “hoist by their own petard” mean anything?

HAHAHA

This will be fun.. … Popcorn anyone?

By: ardee

ardee — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:02:15 +0000

Got to grab all the RNC’s e-mail and servers now before they are deleted!!!!! Waxman, Please hurry!

By: Foo

Foo — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:11:45 +0000

But look! They used the server to recruit new hires! 17 jobs on a political bulletin board? Outside official channels? What the heck kind of a federal hiring practice is that?? Please, when can we get the contents of the server?

By: Lora

Lora — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:17:01 +0000

For any lurkers out there:
You have to believe that Clinton did not kiss or otherwise touch Lewinskyâ€™s breasts or other private parts â€” and that Lewinsky is lying about that â€” for you to believe that Clinton did not lie. We know who keith believes at least.
Comment by Jake

Jake, I’ve generally been avoiding your posts. However, since you have taken it upon yourself to imagine what transpired between Monica Lewinsky and President Clinton, could you please tell us–or at least me–what you think gay hooker Jeff Gannon/James Guckert was doing at the White House on nights even before the Talon News website for which he later worked was set up and also when there were no WH press conferences scheduled?

By: Barfly

Barfly — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:53:59 +0000

[. . . ] Contact includes the TOUCHING and KISSING of said private areas that Ms. Lewinsky testified he did.

Comment by Jake â€” March 29, 2007 @ 6:58 pm

For the love of god, will someone at the retirement home please slip the old horndog some saltpeter? He’ll be groping the invalids next.

By: unspunblog.com » I’ll Show You Mine If You Show Me Yours

unspunblog.com » I’ll Show You Mine If You Show Me Yours — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 05:16:17 +0000

[...] even be aware they are looking. Ah, but if we want to see theirs, now that is a different story. Hell they’ll do all kinds of things just so that we can’t see theirs even if we have a legitimate right to see it and go [...]

By: tom baker

tom baker — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:45:40 +0000

nor jake nor patrick nor howsad nor happy guy nor valiant venus nor any other Righty.

Hippies don’t molest/kill children – Fundy/Churchies do.

By: dixie blood

dixie blood — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:45:02 +0000

You wouldnâ€™t trust Foley, or Gannon, or Haggard, or Rove with your kids?

Comment by keith â€” March 29, 2007 @ 7:33 pm

If “kids” means baby goats then the answer is still NO!!

By: keith

keith — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:33:54 +0000

You wouldn’t trust Foley, or Gannon, or Haggard, or Rove with your kids?

By: keith

keith — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:30:08 +0000

I’ll agree with “peccadillo”. That’s a good name for it. Sounds lurid enough for Jake to enjoy, too.

By: tom baker

tom baker — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:25:58 +0000

at the end of the day –

cool/good/decent people never indicted/have forgiven/don’t/didn’t care about clinton’s peccadillo.

bushie/righties are manson family cultists who i wouldn’t trust for 5 sec. in a room alone with my kids.

keith - I sincerely thank you for your effort to clear the record. Given the quality of objectors we see around here, you’re prolly wasting your “A” material.