75% of production profit for fatkatz : 25% of the production profit to Iraq.

Such a PNAC deal!

Operation Iraqi Liberation=O.I.L.=Oil Israel Logistics
How did our oil get beneath their sand?

Gen. Betrayous should be marched out, stipped of his medals and let’s watch him give that blowjob in public instead of in the conservanazi republikan caucus.

What does Betrayous want? 6 stars. WTF! The rotten nazi bastards are playing games to make themselves look good.

How f*cking sick is t his.

“Nobody wants to be the last rat off the ship.”

Nobody “wants” to be the first rat off the ship, either. Individual disloyalty to this admin has been a political death sentence. They’ll try to go as a pack of rats. Safety in numbers.

“the White House hopes the troop buildup then will succeed in bringing enough stability to Baghdad by August that U.S. forces can withdraw to the city outskirts. ‘By the end of the year, Baghdad’s got to look significantly different,’ said a National Security Council official not authorized to speak on the record.”

this isn’t a new date, so probably there’s new pressure from the newly shrill rabble to get off the pot.

Figures. You guys win the election and what happens? Within six months: it’s Clydesville already. The Pelosi Congress is already more unpopular than Bush.

That’s right. Your Dhimmitude Congressmen couldn’t be bothered to show up for General Petreaus. There was no Rovian Plot.

Comment by Unstintingly Independent #74

This people is why so-called “Independents”…

…so copulate you and ALL your “Independent” family, friends, neighbors and co-workers…

Betraeus was meeting with the Republicans in order to offer assistance in their legislative blocking of Democratic legislation. If you really think Dems were invited, then you have a head as thick as your C-in-C.

What’s he going to do? Ask for people to turn those explosives in?

A truck with 4,000 pounds of explosives just blew up. WHERE do you get two tons of explosives?

From George “Can’t be bothered to go to work” Bush, that’s who.

General Betraeus already has.

Sounds pretty serious. The RS Insider checked with sources on the Hill and in the Defense Department and discovered there are only two problems with the story.

1) General Petraeus did give a Congressional briefing last month – a “video-conference at the Pentagon” – and it was open to Republicans and Democrats.

2) Democrats chose not to attend.

So General Petraeus gave a briefing to the Republican caucus….because Democrats couldn’t be bothered to show up.

Next time, instead of criticizing General Petraeus for briefing Republicans on the war, perhaps liberal bloggers should suggest the Democrats actually attend those briefings.

Dear Thomas E. Gimble,

I request you investigate Gen. David Petraeus for violating regulations prohibiting partisan political activity while in uniform or acting in an official capacity.

NBC’s Andrea Mitchell described Petraeus meeting with the Republican Congressional caucus. From Mitchell’s description it appears Petraeus may have been participating in a meeting that was primarily strategizing for how Congressional Republicans will further their political interests.

Many Americans are suspicious of the motivations of President George W. Bush with respect to Iraq. Many of us suspect Iraq policy is really driven by domestic politics—and has been from the beginning—not reasoned, realistic strategic objectives.

Given this climate, Petraeus probably should have refused to meeting separately with Congressional Republicans.

Sincerely,

Carl Nyberg
US Navy 85-96