She is an American HERO after this trip.

Comment by margaret #17

…through inbreeding and “home-fooling”…er “schooling”…

First off, she’s third in line to the the presidency and doesn’t answer to Bush, so she can do whatever she damn well pleases. Bush and Condi can continue to plug their ears and sing “Na, na, na, na….” as they always do rather than use dimplomacy.

Evidently ignorant individuals such as yourself don’t worry about such glaring contradictions with your own party. Nice.

The GOP would not send it’s top Republican (that’s the President, folks) to hang out with the enemy. In a damn burka, no less. The woman is a traitor – a goddamn traitor.

What an asinine response. Now why would Bush send himself to Syria when he has stated flat out to be against any diplomatic roads set forth by his own appointed Iraqi Study Group headed up by the Republican and longtime friend of daddy, James Baker?

Or perhaps more to the point, why would people in his own loyal party break ranks and abuse Bush’s loyalty and go there themselves? It’s obvious that anyone that disagrees with you and your “fearless” leader are branded as “traitors” and aiding terrorists. Seems to me that you should be directing your vitriole more towards your own “traitors” in your own party for doing what our librul “traitor” leader is doing. Why don’t you spew that outrage here, sir, for all to see?

And speaking of traitors within your own party, how do you feel about your Administration for outing a covert CIA officer who’s sole job was to find WMDs in Iraq and Iran? You remember, right? Because she sure could be helping out your claims of Iranian nukes right now had she not been outed. Can you tell me why you support a traitor like Rove deliberately outing one of our operatives in a time of war, and why he still has security clearance?

I’m sorry, you were saying something about “traitors.” Please continue….

What label do you place on a man (Bush) who sends men and women, (not you I assume) off to fight a war based on lies, false information and the goal of making contractors wealthy, only to return to find cockroaches, mice and mold in their hospital room while they heal from the amputation of all of their limbs? DOHHHH!

Hmmm, I guess that leaves out a healthy handful of other butchers that Bush has personal relationships worldwide and refuses to break off. Funny how your labelling is not so terribly self-reflective.

Pelosi ’s ass kissing aside.

Or the rest of the Republicans doing exactly the same thing (kissing gestures absent, of course).

They’re going to Syria because they’re on subcommittees responsible for funding CIA operations. They’re likely over there trying to cut some deals with Syria to try to determine the needs of the American CIA folks operating in the region.

That’s my best guess.

Great job, Patrick1. Just keep standing by your man while he leads both of you OFF A CLIFF….

Oh I see, so a “kiss” is what separates your condemnation of Republicans doing the exact same diplomatic efforts as Pelosi. Got it.

The Iraq Study Group was a joke.

Then perhaps Bush should not have assigned someone as astute as Baker in the first place. I’m sorry if what they found and suggested is not in line with your twisted neocon world-police view on things, but as for the rest of the majority of Americans and most other countries for that matter, we tend to call it something that might be a bit alien to you:

“reality”

Strange concept for your elementary thinking skills, I realize, but not to worry. We Democrats and reasonable Republicans will once again clean up the mess you idiots have created. And we might just save a bit more dignity in doing so. Don’t worry – we’re used to the job cleaning up your dung thrown everywhere.

Please please please don’t feed the trolls
Comment by klyde

Exactly. Come on, by now it is evident that Patrick1 is a non-issue.