I know this is hard to accept, but us “liberals” are going to have to do some serious soul searching over this issue. The (uncensored) science just does not back up the claims of Al Gore and others in the global warming lobby.

For once, President Bush is right, hate him as much as we do.

Global warming is about global government, not any real concern about environmental issues.

For a second time, Lord Monckton of Brenchley has challenged sophist Gore to a debate on man-made climate change, in an ad featured in the April 3rd Washington Post. Moncton’s first challenge was issued March 14th of this year, but was left unanswered by the self-proclaimed “Goracle”. The ad will soon be featured in the New York Times and Wall Street Journal as well.

In November 2006, Lord Monckton issued a 40-page research paper on the fraud of global warming, titled “Apocalypse Cancelled”. In it, Monckton says: “Last week Gordon Brown and his chief economist both said global warming was the worst market failure ever. That loaded sound-bite suggests the climate change scare is less about saving the planet than, in Jacques Chirac’s chilling phrase, creating world government.”

Lord Monckton also said that the environmentalist’s “precautionary principle” is killing people. He gives the example of the banning of DDT, noting that just this year, after 30 million people died of malaria; the World Health Organization has agreed to use DDT for indoor spraying. Lord Monckton also calls for the UK to start building–not merely designing, or having a ten-year planning inquiry about) 12 nuclear power stations.

In 2005, the House of Lords started an inquiry into the science of global warming and the role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and held hearings taking statements from scientists against global warming, like Dr. Paul Reiter and Richard Lindzen of MIT. The House of Lords also took testimony from Sir John Houghton.

In July of 2005, the House of Lords issued its report, called “The Economics of Climate Change”. News of this report, however, was overshadowed by the July 7 London subway bombings. The report was to be released and covered by in the media prior to the Gleneagles Scotland G-8 meeting, and was to influence the debate of the G-8. Of particular note in the House of Lords report is that it called for the IPCC to be shut down because it was a vehicle for a set policy without looking at the science, didn’t listen to dissenting voices, and its process for selecting scientists for the panel was politically driven. It is of note that the House of Lords report is not mentioned by the IPCC or the Stern Review.

In August 2005, in response to the House of Lords Report, Gordon Brown went to his chief economist, Sir Nick Stern (who was the Chief Economist of the World Bank from 2000-2003), and told him to produce a report on the economic effects of climate change.

In October 2006, the Stern Review was released to much media hype and fanfare, but the report got little attention until the IPCC released their Summary for Policymakers in February.

There is only one reason why Gore will not answer Monckton: because he knows global warming is a massive swindle!

For too long the media has been dominated by the lies of the environmentalist lobby. Now science and truth are fighting back.

What I find particularly ironic is those Republicans in souther coastal states voting for the government to take over risk from insurance companies to lower rates. I thought they were for less government. Those states that cover storm damage will get burned rather quickly: I hear it will be another active hurricane year.

All I know is, I don’t have to think about my Firefox, so it must be good. :D

Compared to internet explorer it’s a small program and not nearly as invasive as IE. (not to mention IE patches)

You ain’t kidding.

I love Firefox. No stupid pop-ups, and tabbed browsing…for idiots.

I can always spot you, Zep. Yes, it was excellent. :D

I probably would like your stickers as much as you do. Funny thing about bumper stickers here in Texas, I haven’t seen a pro-Bush sticker in quite a while.
Comment by Zep Tepi

I still see them here, but they are not as plentiful as they used to be. :) My newest bumpersticker: Can’t Sleep. Clowns Will Eat Me.

I love it. :)

Are you on AOL? They have a bad habit of closing your browser when the connection is broken. You can use a browser on top of AOL such as the Firefox (free @ mozilla.org) browser. I use AOL but hate their bloated software so I use the AOL Dialer (no AOl Browser loads up) and the Firefox browser. =)

New cars are such a racket. Drive onto the highway, and lose 20% — at least. I can never sell my car. Who would love my bumperstickers as much as I do?
Comment by Zooey

I probably would like your stickers as much as you do. Funny thing about bumper stickers here in Texas, I haven’t seen a pro-Bush sticker in quite a while.

I was asking because often in the middle of typing my internet disconnects and I lose everything. Of course everything lost is brilliant. Only my boring posts get through.

zooey

I was posting about our girls night out when the waters get high enough. Anyway, any “moron” goes with viral venom.

I’m just so suspicious in general. :P

New cars are such a racket. Drive onto the highway, and lose 20% — at least. I can never sell my car. Who would love my bumperstickers as much as I do?

At the lower levels it’s possible, but at the higher levels I have many doubts.

Not to mention depreciation of said vehicle.

Why Zooey that wasn’t me =) Why I am shocked you’d think I could be so sarcastic (heh)

NOW REGARDING ME.. FULL OF INTEGRITY/HONESTY, I SHOULD BE
PRESIDENT DUDE, I’M JUST SO HEAVENLY AWESOME

NOW DUDE… I’LL CHILL OUT AND TAKE A CHILL PILL DUDE

AM I A TROLL OR JUST SO HEAVINGLY AWESOME, SO ULTIMATELY COOL THAT I BLOW EVERYONE AWAY :)