Bill O’Reilly: JFK Conspiracy Theorist
Bill O’Reilly: JFK Conspiracy Theorist
Fox News host Bill O’Reilly has been criticizing Rosie O’Donnell over her blog post repeating a 9/11 conspiracy theory.
O’Reilly declared that “you can’t allow” someone to “make anti-American remarks…accusing your own government of murder.” He called claims that the U.S. government acted in a criminal way “irresponsible and dangerous.”
Too bad for O’Reilly, tapes from his days on the Peabody Award-winning Inside Edition are still floating around.
Watch below as O’Reilly spreads the JFK conspiracy theory that the CIA secretly supported assassin Lee Harvey Oswald:
Transcript:
Bill O’Reilly, 4/2/07:
O’REILLY: The problem, once you get into an area where you are spreading propaganda, OK, which is where she is with the 9/11 conspiracy… See, you can’t allow someone like that to go on and make anti-American remarks, in which they are, accusing your own government of murder, of putting people in harm’s way and then have nothing else to balance it.
…
O’REILLY: Well, Ms. O’Donnell and her radical pals are basically telling the world the USA is a criminal nation … O’Donnell and actor Charley Sheen are also peddling the 9/11 conspiracy theory that the attack on the World Trade Center was an inside job. Never mind that nonsense has been debunked by “Popular Mechanics” using scientific evidence that is beyond dispute.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
*snort*
Nice catch.
April 6th, 2007 at 12:16 pmSo...making claims to illegal activity on behalf of the government is dangerous and reckless? Even if it's true?
I guess O'Reilly's going back to the old reliable: questioning dear leader is treason.
I'm sorry, O'Reilly, but I'm going to use my right to free speech to denounce the actions of what I feel is a criminal administration all I want. This is not a dictatorship, no matter how much Bush, O'Reilly, and his ilk want it to be.
April 6th, 2007 at 12:18 pmO’Reilly declared that “you can’t allow†someone to “make anti-American remarks…accusing your own government of murder.â€
Last time I looked, Billo, we still have First Amendment rights.
Right now, the USA is a criminal nation.
April 6th, 2007 at 12:18 pmNico,
I love your strikeout on the
April 6th, 2007 at 12:20 pmPeabody Award. So snarky.O’Reilly declared that “you can’t allow†someone to “make anti-American remarks…accusing your own government of murder.â€
Really?
We can no longer speak out against our government?
So all those brave men who died for the last two centuries so we could, died in vain?
Someone let me know when we start handing out "Liberal stars", so I can catch a slow boat to Europe.
April 6th, 2007 at 12:20 pmO'lilie's rating's must be realy low this week, he's squealing like the stuck hog he is to get attention.....Blessings
April 6th, 2007 at 12:22 pmDoes he even remember his little Fuhrer tirade with Geraldo?
:|
He should wait till we stop laughing about that one before giving us something new to mock him on.
April 6th, 2007 at 12:23 pmSo how many of you thinking people here at ThinkProgress believe that the Bush administration or parts of the US government had something to do with 9/11 ?
Anyone?
April 6th, 2007 at 12:25 pmRingo,
This is not a 9/11 thread. Try to keep up.
April 6th, 2007 at 12:26 pmSo how many of you thinking people here at ThinkProgress believe that the Bush administration or parts of the US government had something to do with 9/11 ?
Anyone?
Comment by Ringo — April 6, 2007 @ 12:25 pm
That's reaaly not the point now is it? The point is that Billo has forgotten that this is a country where we are allowed to speak out against our government...at least for now.
April 6th, 2007 at 12:29 pmWhy does Ringo sound so much like Jake or Michael
We don't have to answer your questions, "Ringo."
BTW didn't Ann Coulter want to poison our Judges that are part of our government?
We can't have Americans, especially the Pundits, wanting to poison the Judiciary section of our government! It is un-American!
April 6th, 2007 at 12:31 pmlook at his hair!
April 6th, 2007 at 12:31 pmThen there's Bill O'Reilly's VideoGate...
April 6th, 2007 at 12:32 pmHey, Zep-ster.
Hope you're having a good day.
Off to class, see ya later!
April 6th, 2007 at 12:34 pmSo how many of you thinking people here at ThinkProgress believe that the Bush administration or parts of the US government had something to do with 9/11 ?
Anyone?
I do.
April 6th, 2007 at 12:35 pmWe don’t have to answer your questions, “Ringo.â€
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I guess that puts you in the Rosie catagory.
Thanks.
April 6th, 2007 at 12:35 pmSo how many of you thinking people here at ThinkProgress believe that the Bush administration or parts of the US government had something to do with 9/11 ?
Anyone?
Comment by Ringo
I wouldn't put ANYTHING past this bunch of criminals!!!
April 6th, 2007 at 12:36 pmHey Oreilly didn't you say you'd stop supporting the Bush admin if no WMD were found? Huh? What happened to that?
April 6th, 2007 at 12:36 pmThe truth about the European Union.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=62612529763293088&q=The+real+EU&hl=en
April 6th, 2007 at 12:39 pmHey, he is just trying to make a buck (or several million of them anyway). This is Entertainment just like his Jeraldo 'argument.'
April 6th, 2007 at 12:39 pmHelo Zooey, I'm fine thank you.
How iz youze?
O’Really declared that “you can’t allow†Ann Coulter to “make anti-American remarks…wanting to poison judges.†He called such tirades that to poison U.S. government Judges a criminal act “irresponsible and dangerous"
April 6th, 2007 at 12:41 pmJust Brilliant!
April 6th, 2007 at 12:43 pmI guess that puts you in the Rosie catagory.
Thanks. Comment by Ringo
I don't now, or have ever, watched Rosie nor do I feel a need to watch FECKS SNOOZE.
Your right on one point, however -YOU ARE guessing.
April 6th, 2007 at 12:45 pmTalk about O-Reilly all you want. The truth is, he became a mouth-piece for his masters a long time ago. If you don't like what he says, here's an idea: give him five million dollars today. He'll change his mind tomorrow.
However, his report on Inside Edition rings with the truth. It's not a conspiracy "theory". It's a conspiracy FACT. Oswald WAS working with Anti-Castro groups which were being operated by CIA assets. And he WAS also posing as a pro-communist fanatic, ostensibly so he could infiltrate pro-communist groups in America. And there's evidence now to suggest that he was also INFORMING on those groups for the FBI, because Kennedy had ordered them shut down.
Now does any of that mean that there was another shooter on the Grassy Knowl?
Not necessarily. But it COULD explain why there wasn't a rigorous investigation after the assassination. It could be that neither organization wanted to be connected to the guy who shot Kennedy.
Lastly, look up "Oil Depletion Allowance" and "The Kennedy Act".
Food for thought.
It may have happened nearly forty-five years ago, but I haven't forgotten.
April 6th, 2007 at 12:47 pmWow, Think Progress is almost giving credence to the notion that Bush may have LIED to us about what happened on 9/11. What's next -- will Daily Kos lift its ban of any discussion of 9/11?
April 6th, 2007 at 12:49 pmWell he has done it again; shoved one too many falafels up his no spin zone using a very abrasive loofa and given himself a partial labatomy
April 6th, 2007 at 12:50 pmCan't someone gag this moron!
April 6th, 2007 at 12:51 pmThere is a first amendment right, at the same time there is still such a thing as treason. Throwing out conspiracy crap saying that the government is responsible for 9/11 borders on treason. On the other hand, ORielly's reports on an actual house investigation is newsworthy. It is pathetic to compare the two and equally negligent.
April 6th, 2007 at 12:52 pmComment by Dan W. — April 6, 2007 @ 12:49 pm
How do you get that from an article that makes BORe out to be a hypocrite?
Projecting and assuming I suppose?
April 6th, 2007 at 12:55 pmZep Tepi,
I don’t now, or have ever, watched Rosie
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't mean to suggest that you watch Rosie.
What I meant is that you - like Rosie - are a 9/11 truthy.
Am I wrong?
April 6th, 2007 at 12:55 pmOOOH ....... Popular Mechanics says it ain't so, well, I guess that settles the whole matter right there..........
April 6th, 2007 at 12:59 pm(dripping sarcasm: off)
What I meant is that you - like Rosie - are a 9/11 truthy.
Am I wrong?
Comment by Ringo
Of course you are - your GUESSING again. Jeez.
But I did read the 9/11 commission report does that make me a truthy?
Bwahahahha. Quit assuming you know what you don't know Ringo.
April 6th, 2007 at 1:02 pmHypocrites hate the internet.
April 6th, 2007 at 1:08 pmhttp://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6fb_1175816707
marines on mission to find insurgents. the video is quite intense. will show just how scared the marines are. frankly its f. up to see what this coward occupying my white house is doing to these young men and women.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=01e_1174091038 - Trump "Everything in Washington is a Lie"
April 6th, 2007 at 1:09 pmNo big surprise how millions of dollars can make a guy change his "journalistic" philosophy to fit an agenda.
April 6th, 2007 at 1:14 pmSo how many of you thinking people here at ThinkProgress believe that the Bush administration or parts of the US government had something to do with 9/11 ?
Anyone?
Comment by Bongo the dancing chimp — April 6, 2007 @ 12:25 pm
Kind of hard to tell now isn't it? Considering you guys won't answer any questions and stonewall any investigations, and hide behind presidential privliege.
I'll answer that question in a few years, once the investigations are complete.
April 6th, 2007 at 1:18 pmAt least Bill knows our government is mostly lying about JFK's assassination, now that he's a talking head for FOX I doubt he'll ever affirm those prior beliefs.
He must be so well conditioned from the attacks leveled against him by the right when he did this story that he learned and now applies them today on his own show where he attacks everyone that contradicts him and the "party" line.
April 6th, 2007 at 1:25 pmCIA assesinated JFK.He was too honest politician to preside the country those days.That was unacceptable for the secret powers.
April 6th, 2007 at 1:27 pmBwahahahha. Quit assuming you know what you don’t know Ringo.
Comment by Zep Tepi
---------------------------------------------------------
Alright, I'll put you on the fence....but every other "thinker" here seems to be on the truther side.
Raven actually thinks that she know more than the brainy nerds at Popular Mechanics.
Quite disgusting really.....Most of you nutters need professional help.
April 6th, 2007 at 1:32 pmRingo, take your Ritalin, re-read the story, and try to stay on topic. I know it's difficult for you but try.
April 6th, 2007 at 1:35 pmIn my lifetime, I hope the criminals, murderers, thieves, and liars who MADE 9-11 HAPPEN ON PURPOSE will be brought to justice. This is my hope ...
April 6th, 2007 at 1:46 pmWho did 9-11 hurt? Virtually all of us.
April 6th, 2007 at 1:47 pmOK who benefited from 9-11? You guessed right: these crooks who got re-elected and have done unprecented damage using 9-11 and terrorism all along.
So why is it so unthinkable that they may have something to do with this?
Oh, that's right, our government wouldn't lie to us...
Who did make those buildings implode into their own foot print? Buildings dont just magically implode. That requires demolitions explosives being carefully placed. The fire fighters and police that were there that day said that explosions were going off just like a building being demolitioned. Who are we to believe? O'Reilly or the police and fire fighters that were there.... not to mention our own eyes.
April 6th, 2007 at 1:49 pmPopular Mechanics didnt even attempt to prove anything. Go read their article.. they just repeat the same tired and unproven claims.
April 6th, 2007 at 1:51 pmYou folks are freakin' nuts.
Sad, pathetic fools.
I've always known that narcissism, naievety and delusion were the main ingredents of the Lefty psyche but you truthers are truly insane.
April 6th, 2007 at 1:57 pmPopular Mechanics didnt even attempt to prove anything. Go read their article.. they just repeat the same tired and unproven claims.
Comment by ggibson
--------------------------------------------------------
So Popular Mechanics is now part of the conspiracy?
You're a crazy idiot.
April 6th, 2007 at 1:59 pmYou folks are freakin’ nuts.
Sad, pathetic fools.
I’ve always known that narcissism, naievety and delusion were the main ingredents of the Lefty psyche but you truthers are truly insane.
Comment by Bonzo the talking gorilla — April 6, 2007 @ 1:57 pm
Wow.
That really hurts, coming from such a well respected individual as yourself.
:|
April 6th, 2007 at 2:02 pmWell, Ms. O’Donnell and her radical pals are basically telling the world the USA is a criminal nation
Comment by Hitlers new Propaganda Minister
No.
What Ms O'Donnell and her radical pals are telling the world, is the USA is being RUN by criminals.
April 6th, 2007 at 2:07 pmThere are at least 2 prominent conspiracy theories about the events of 9/11.
1. people inside a cave in Afghanistan conspired with a few religious zealots to attack the United States.
2. people inside the White House conspired with a few fascist/imperialist zealots to create a new "Pearl Harbor" to manipulate the people and Congress into an unprecendented expansion of Presidental Power.
The "official explanation" supports theory #1. Yet no criminal investigation was ever conducted. The only official investigation conducted was limited to determining what, if any, lapses in intelligence gathering allowed the events to occur. In other words, the only official investigation was performed solely for the purpose of finding and naming a scapegoat.
As a result, the "official explanation" accepted certain facts as true which were physically and technologically impossible.
Bush has started 2 wars because of events which were never fully investigated. He has used 9/11 to justify killing hundreds of thousands of children, women, and men.
And, with impeachment off the table, he will cause the deaths of thousands more.
April 6th, 2007 at 2:10 pmRingo, I hope no one is paying you to troll, you aren't very good at it and you should be fired for performance issues.
Really Ringo you can't even spell Category who are you to tell me what I think and don't think? You have a crystal ball there Mr. Fortune Teller?
Got ESP? Got a way to read peoples minds?
No?
Then please be quiet and on topic thanks for playing, nuff said, got it?
Your assuming again Ringo I don't rad Alex Jones nor any of the links you supplied. Your sitting here calling people names for things that YOU THINK are true.
April 6th, 2007 at 2:12 pmI WORFEUS,
Your parents love you, listen to them and seek psychological counseling.
It's not too late.
April 6th, 2007 at 2:12 pmComment by Ringo
Ringo, now your trying to tell people to seek counseling when it's you who are imagining that you know what people think by sitting in front of a computer monitor??
You do realize that sounds a bit nutty don't you?
April 6th, 2007 at 2:15 pmRingo, I hope no one is paying you to troll, you aren’t very good at it
Comment by Zep Tepi — April 6, 2007 @ 2:12 pm
Actually. if they're not, then we will.
Pay him that is.
You have to admit he does make us look awfully good.
April 6th, 2007 at 2:16 pmI WORFEUS,
Your parents love you, listen to them and seek psychological counseling.
It’s not too late.
Comment by Bozo — April 6, 2007 @ 2:12 pm
:|
You guys just sorta got screwed on the "funny gene", huh?
April 6th, 2007 at 2:21 pmou have to admit he does make us look awfully good.
Comment by I WORFEUS
And, to boot, he makes Independents and Republicans look bad with all this guesswork and see a psychologist babble. Now he has started with his third grade semantics you know he's flustered. =)
Heh Heh
April 6th, 2007 at 2:22 pmHey Ringo tell me what I am thinking right now, ok?
Bwah.
Hint; A vacuum
April 6th, 2007 at 2:24 pmNow he has started with his third grade semantics you know he’s flustered. =)
Comment by Zep Tepi — April 6, 2007 @ 2:22 pm
shhhh
Don't tip him off.
I'm hoping he'll start squawking soon.
April 6th, 2007 at 2:29 pmI know what I'm thinking.
April 6th, 2007 at 2:29 pmI know what I’m thinking.
Comment by Dingo — April 6, 2007 @ 2:29 pm
Yea?
Too bad you don't know what you're saying.
April 6th, 2007 at 2:34 pmFinally we have found something Bill O'Reilly and the moonbats can agree on. That the CIA killed JFK!
April 6th, 2007 at 2:52 pmFinally we have found something Bill O’Reilly and the moonbats can agree on. That the CIA killed JFK!
Comment by Dick1 — April 6, 2007 @ 2:52 pm
Oooh please Patrick, call us moonbats again?
It hurts so good.
April 6th, 2007 at 3:08 pmWhat is particularly endearing about your trollish naivety st. Patrick. is your utter insistence that all of us ascribe to your list of preconceived neocon talking points.
Like I said.
If they're not paying you...
April 6th, 2007 at 3:11 pmThe government IS responsible for 9/11.
1 - The various intelligence agencies failed to communicate with each other regarding a number of suspicious activities that ultimately were linked to preparation for the terrorist attacks on that horrible day.
2 - Bush received an intelligence report stating that Bin Laden and his group were "...determined to strike..." within the United States. Bush and his administration did absolutely nothing to raise the awareness of that forewarning with anybody. With the immigration authorities, with the shipping ports, the transportation authorities.
Let me spell it out for the right wing retards.
N O T H I N G spells 'nothing.'
Therefore, I blame the U.S. government for 9/11.
Now all you right wing retards can go f**k yourselves with a picture of George and feel the pain.
April 6th, 2007 at 3:17 pm......from his days at "Inside Edition"???????????? Given ALL the time you spend on him, If I didn't know better, I would think someone at TP had a crush on Bill O. (Ahhh...I realize rational Progs think Rosie O has a screw loose....and those who agree with her, deserve her....)
April 6th, 2007 at 3:17 pmSo Popular Mechanics is now part of the conspiracy?
You’re a crazy idiot.
Comment by Ringo
I should hope not. They are being as lazy as most of the other reporters nowadays.
April 6th, 2007 at 3:28 pmOn the one side, we have the anti-conspiricy theorists, who believe there is absolutely no ties to the administration or any federal people of any kind.
On the other side we have conspiricy theorists, who think Karl Rove gave the terrorists flight training.
I think the answer, as with most things, lies somewhere inbetween.
If there is complicty, its probably more of a "look the other way" thing, and instead of active involvement, it was more of just letting them get away with it so we'd have a reason to hate them, and Bush would have a war mandate. After all, he was tanking in the polls, and the term "Lame Duck" was being bantered about just before 911, and thanks to 911 he shot up in the polls into record breaking approval ratings. Anyone who says the Bush administration did not benefit from 911, is just lying to themselves.
In other words, there are questions.
Lots of people have questions, and I don't see why there would be any resistence to seeking answers to those questions, especially from the White House. In fact, the fact that there is any resistence at all, much less the stonewalling we've seen, raises a red flag in and of itself.
There is no doubt we need to seek the truth, and there is also no doubt, that no matter how long the Bush adminisration stonewalls, and says "we didn't do nuttin", sooner or later, there will be investigations, and the truth will come out.
And God help you people if they'res anything there.
April 6th, 2007 at 3:39 pmAnd yes. they'res = theres
April 6th, 2007 at 3:55 pmNot to mention the Iraqis.
Also, toward the end, they shoot up a poor dog that just happened to be in the wrong place.
Couple that with this:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6445f9fdd7
and this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9A_vxIOB-I&NR
These things make me sick.
April 6th, 2007 at 3:57 pmWell said Briseadh na Faire, the 9/11 commission started from the official theory and worked backwards to "make the pieces fit".(amazingly similar to the cherry picking of pre-Iraq War intel, isn't it?)
The commission never dealt with the actual collapse of the buildings and the destruction of WTC7 was apparrently so baffling they simply left out the symmetrical implosion of a 47 story, highly redundant skyscraper into its own footprint in 6.6 seconds- as if it wasn't worth mentioning.
The government simply states that "global collapse ensues", is this the sort of in-depth scientific analysis our 11 million dollars bought?(one of the smallest budgets ever in modern history for such a massive federal investigation, btw- the Challenger disaster received 50 million and the Clinton investigation 98 m)
Nevermind the fact that there's no energy nor mechanism for global collapse and none has ever been given by official sources(tests run by UL verify that hydrocarbon fires could NOT weaken the trusses enough to even initiate collapse, let alone global collapse in under 13 seconds).
Yet BORe has the audacity to claim the facts are on his side. (without actually discussing ANY facts, that would just be a waste of time- right Orally?)
April 6th, 2007 at 4:00 pmO'Reilly's a pig - that's clear.
April 6th, 2007 at 4:35 pm#3 -" Right now, the USA is a criminal nation." - Comment by Zooey
.....and I'm sure you're embarrassed to be an American citizen, too. (If so....we agree on something. I'm embarrassed you're an American citizen, too.)
April 6th, 2007 at 4:37 pmComment by valiant venus
Hell the entire south and their enslavement of other human beings like the egyptians did to the jews is really embarrassing. Its no reason to be embarrassed to be an American. The ethnic cleansing against the Indians is embarrassing, but that is no reason to be embarrassed to be an American. Calling a spade a spade no matter who commited the crime is what American style justice is all about. No man is a king.
April 6th, 2007 at 4:44 pm#66 - ."..If there is complicty, its probably more of a “look the other way†thing, and instead of active involvement, it was more of just letting them get away with it so we’d have a reason to hate them, ..."
Comment by WORFEUS
Worfeus - Assuming you are correct and the FBI handed over a "threat window" WITHOUT identifying the airlines, the flight numbers, the originating cities, the destination cities, etc... CAN YOU IMAGINE the "Civil Libertarians" at the ACLU and the reaction to heightened ethnic scrutiny of ANYONR appearing remotely Middle Eastern??? Your hindsight is 20/40...
April 6th, 2007 at 4:45 pmGerald - Why don't I care what you think?
April 6th, 2007 at 4:47 pmComment by valiant venus — April 6, 2007 @ 4:47 pm
I can answer that one. Because your a self-absorbed b__ch who masquerades as a lawyer wannabe and makes sick humor about an allegedly dead daughter. Your personal life is a disaster and you come here with your negativity to get some attention, even if it's only negative attention. You'll say I'm completely off-base, but the Runes say otherwise...and they totally freaked you out. "oooogh boooga"
April 6th, 2007 at 4:58 pm#
There is a first amendment right, at the same time there is still such a thing as treason. Throwing out conspiracy crap saying that the government is responsible for 9/11 borders on treason. On the other hand, ORielly’s reports on an actual house investigation is newsworthy. It is pathetic to compare the two and equally negligent.
Comment by rabidbunny — April 6, 2007 @ 12:52 pm
This is the Merriam-Webster definition of treason: the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family.
Here's your assignment: contrast and compare the difference between the above definition and speculating on a conspiracy.
Methinks you've already failed the assignment. Prove me wrong.
April 6th, 2007 at 5:14 pmBraid Faire - Why do I care EVEN less what you "think"? You poor dear, ever since I politely explained that I didn't wish to exchange private e-mails with you, you have been rude and ugly.....I'm fairly certain you're completely benign, but I take no chances - especially with rune readers.....
Happy Whatever you celebrate.....
April 6th, 2007 at 5:19 pmWho takes this idiot seriously anymore?
April 6th, 2007 at 6:15 pm[...] O’Reilly: JFK Conspiracy Theorist Bill O’Reilly: JFK Conspiracy Theorist O’Reilly, who has been ripping into Rosie O’Donnell for spreading 9/11 conspiracy [...]
April 6th, 2007 at 8:56 pmWorfeus - Assuming you are correct and the FBI handed over a “threat window†WITHOUT identifying the airlines, the flight numbers, the originating cities, the destination cities, etc… CAN YOU IMAGINE the “Civil Libertarians†at the ACLU blah blah blah blah blah
Comment by no genius — April 6, 2007 @ 4:45 pm
Quit inventing your bullshit scenarios and attributing my name to them.
If I needed a rube to do my thinking for me, I'd put a leash on your pet dingo there.
April 6th, 2007 at 9:10 pmHappy Whatever you celebrate…..
Comment by malevolent penus — April 6, 2007 @ 5:19 pm
I'd happily celebrate your shutting the hell up.
April 6th, 2007 at 9:13 pmWhy do I care EVEN less what you “think� You poor dear, ever since I politely explained that I didn’t wish to exchange private e-mails with you,...
Comment by valiant venus — April 6, 2007 @ 5:19 pm
You flatter yourself. It didn't bother me in the least that you didn't want to make a professional contact. After all, that's when I thought you were what you claimed: a lawyer. Once I learned your true nature, I was glad you didn't take me up on my offer. You wouldn't exactly be part of a professional network of mine. A client, perhaps, but not a colleague.
And you never change. In fact, your Rune today is Eoh: Change: Reversed. I have never met someone who's Runes are so consistently reversed.
April 6th, 2007 at 10:00 pm…..and I’m sure you’re embarrassed to be an American citizen, too. (If so….we agree on something. I’m embarrassed you’re an American citizen, too.)
Comment by valiant venus
Actually, as a woman, I feel quite fortunate to be an American. This country once was great, and will be great again, if we're very lucky.
I am not blind to this administration's attempt to destroy this country. Why are you satisfied with the condition of this country, Hag? Do you think that when the shit hits the fan, you're safe because of some warped ideology? Don't count on it.
“If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end in doubts: but if he will be content to begin with doubts, he shall end in certainties.â€
April 6th, 2007 at 10:19 pm-- Francis Bacon, Sr
I bet Professor Steven Jones know more than non-existent 70 researchers Popular Mechanics talked to.
Popular Mechanics lied. FEMA and NiST disagree on irreconcilable points.
DEAL WITH IT.
The WTC tower blue prints were released and they prove the official explanation is an absolute joke.
April 7th, 2007 at 2:04 am[...] read more | digg story [...]
April 7th, 2007 at 4:29 amThere is a difference between a coment within a blog, which in my opion is a personal opinion and doing something that creates publicity based on an opion rather than fact.
The right to free speech is something that I am proud of, providing of course it is done within a personal platform and not a national one.
The fact that I know about this, is because Bill O Reilly, brought this to me attention. otherwise I would never have known
Breakdown Insurance
April 7th, 2007 at 8:09 amSo how many of you thinking people here at ThinkProgress believe that the Bush administration or parts of the US government had something to do with 9/11 ?
Anyone?
Comment by Ringo — April 6, 2007 @ 12:25 pm
Count me in. And Bill was right about Oswald and his CIA connections. How many thinking people here believe in the single shooter/magic bullet theory?
April 7th, 2007 at 10:42 amIt looks like he was a REPORTER for Inside Edition, not a commentator. It also looks to me like he was reporting facts that had been compiled by the Inside Edition writers.
April 7th, 2007 at 2:37 pmI think in Rosie's case, she is speaking her opinion, as the O'Reilly Factor is Bill's opinion. Neither of them considers themselves a reporter.
I think this comparison used to discredit Bill's reaction to Rosie --- has little credibility.
Try Again
USING THE repugnant-repub TRIED-AND-UNTRUE SWIFT-BOAT-SHIT-SMEAR TACTIC OF "DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO," EH, O'LIE-lly????? WHAT A F*CKING A**HOLE HYPOCRITE YOU ARE, Bill-O!!!!! WHY DON'T YOU JUMP IN THE LAKE AND DROWN????? OH, I FORGOT, THE LAKE WOULD SPIT YOUR FOETID POISONOUS CARCASE OUT LEST IT DIE FROM THE VENOMOUS BILE AND POLLUTION YOUR MISERABLE CORPSE WOULD SPREAD WITHIN ITS CRYSTAL-CLEAR PURE WATERS!!!!!
April 7th, 2007 at 7:03 pmKennedy was gulled by the CIA and let the spies lead him into the Bay of Pigs invasion, which failed primarily because Kennedy, after realizing he had been duped, refused to authorize air power. This infuriated the CIA
April 8th, 2007 at 1:46 pm