Me thinks thou dost protest too much, Seixon,um,er Kilo.
Comment by troll alert — April 9, 2007 @ 12:17 pm

I haven’t protested at all moron.
By all means, please feel free to continue claiming the same thing you have been. Do it twice as often if you like.

This claim being that someone with a long history of using non-American english dictionary spellings of words here and not giving a toss about global warming, Plame or Bush is an American-Norwegian who only cares about those 3 issues.

This actually harms your reputation, not mine. Makes you look lame rather than me. Oh and you do it while hiding behind a different a different identity to boot. LOL.

Seriously, you cannot have failed to notice that every time you make these claims that I enjoy hiighlighting them to ridicule you, can you ?
You may want to look up the word “protest” in a dictionary, because this ain’t it Sherlock.

Man, what a service you provide. Where would these discussion boards be without someone of your sluething talent. LMAO.

and then let them “resign” and slither away into private life or some other country they have dual-citizenship with, while still keeping all their loot?

It should be no surprise that Lieberman would mention in the context of 911 if you consider that Syria, along with Iraq, and Iran – were all mentioned years ago in:

“A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm”…..
What we are watching unfold, paid for with US blood and treasure and our very souls (and the death and destruction of other entire innocent nations), is the execution of a Master Plan, that was in place long before 911:

http://tinyurl.com/3bnhsm

some excerpts:
“Securing the Northern Border”
“Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one with which American can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hizballah, Syria, and Iran, as the principal agents of aggression in Lebanon”[1]
“Given the nature of the regime in Damascus, it is both natural and moral that Israel abandon the slogan comprehensive peace and move to contain Syria, drawing attention to its weapons of mass destruction programs, and rejecting land for peace deals on the Golan Heights.”[1]

“Moving to a Traditional Balance of Power Strategy”
“Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.”[1]

A manifesto written in part by Douglas Feith, the very same Douglas Feith who created the phony intel on Iraq, while working in the Pentagon, in the “Office of Special Plans”, to circumvent and ignore OUR OWN (the United States of America’s) intelligence resources. Very “Special” indeed……

Why do the wishes of Zionist Israel become the blueprints of US Foreign policy?

Lieberman is a reactionary republican, in everything but name.

Thanks loads.

Me thinks thou dost protest too much, Seixon,um,er Kilo.

http://osi-speaks.blogspot.com/2007/04/did-speaker-pelosi-break-any-law-by.html#links

You really haven’t gotten any better at your job have you. You think you might want to start trying at some point ? It has been quite a few months already.

Here’s a tip to get you started….
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/29/100000-2/#comment-529288

Now compare the writing styles, vocabulary, language in use (there’s more than one form of english FYI), unchanging choices of styles employed for highlighting text, etc.

If you were to employ such analysis rather than pulling an uneducated guess out of your butt you’d find exactly zero in common between my own posting history and that guy’s. Yet here you have concluded we are the same person. Yeah way to go sparky.

You could call yourself “Teh Ultermate Spellur” and look just as ridiculous with far less effort.

ps. I have previously posted here for several years in the same style under another name, which isn’t that one. So, you really, really suck at your job.

But instead I was actually comparing the readers of TP to Fox News viewers in terms of their gullibility and willingness to accept obvious lies as the truth as long as this serves their partisan viewpoint.

As I stated, when it reaches a point where everybody (and it is apparently 100%) is happy to read a lie about what a quoted body of english text contains and not only show no recognition of this contradiction, nor raise any concern, but actually respond as though the lie were true, then clearly you’ve matched Fox News viewers in terms of your willingness to accept bullshit as fact.

In fact, considering those polls of Fox viewers I referred to were a lot less than 100% acceptance of lies as fact, you’ve actually surpassed them. Way to go.

BTW feel free to continue calling me a troll if you like. Until you actually disputed the accuracy of what I wrote you haven’t differentiated yourself from me. Here, I’ll help you if you like. You could do this by saying:

“No, I believe that there are hidden words in the quoted transcript which would make TP’s characterization of its contents accurate.”

Or: “I believe that stating someone said something in a transcript that they clearly didn’t does not constitute lying about what they said, for unspecified reasons.”

Right now you haven’t even distinguished yourself from any of the FreeRepublic readers who scream “troll” at anyone expressing an independent thought over there. In fact, and once again, I would have to characterise you as worse.

You are after all calling me a troll for pointing out that words claimed to exist in a body of clearly visible, english text don’t actually appear in that body of text. For pointing out that rather than someone stating something outrageous, what was stated is actually something nobody disputes. Not even you.

This apparently makes me a troublemaker seeking to subvert your non-thinking-based discussion. Well how fkn proud you must be of that to start with. Yeah there’s something worth protecting from the dirty, subversive, word-readers like me. LMAO.

Kilo = Seixon

A Troll by any other name is still a nasty, slimy troll!

Someone who tries to slime ThinkProgress by equating it to Faux Noise (Comment #89) can only be a troll! {:-)

Lieberman Says Pelosi Syria Visit Was ‘Bad For America,’ Suggests Syria Was Behind 9/11

BS you lying hacks.
He said nothing of the sort.

LIEBERMAN: …We’re in a war against the Islamic terrorists who attacked us on 9-11-01. Syria is a state sponsor of terrorism.

LIEBERMAN: But they have

LIE-berman didn’t put those two thoughts together by accident. Like the NeoCons he fronts for, he could have left off the reference to 9/11, but he didn’t. Blitzer (who is NO mental giant) caught him in his subterfuge.

Nasty, Slimy, Troll Kilo needs a remedial reading course and a brain transfusion to wipe the NeoCon filth and lies from his so-called “brain!”

UNDER THE BRIDGE NASTY, SLIMY TROLL!