I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

Funny that VV/MA is worried about her/his spelling of a Lebanese politician ’s name(which was miraculously spelled correctly), while using a plural verb to modify Syria, a singular subject, and reverting to her old bad habit of erroneously writing “fomenting” as “fulmenting”–a mistake pointed out by both me and others in the past. I guess some fake lawyerettes are just slow learners, or maybe they never learn.

WASHINGTON, April 9 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Team Hollywoodnews.com today announces that Dr. Jack Wheeler’s controversial news article, “Two Women In the Middle East” is building traction amongst Bloggers, citizen journalists and the mainstream media. As the story continues its momentum, Team Hollywood requests that all comments and inquiries be directed to Dr. Jack Wheeler’s website link, relating to the article, at http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/2721/44/

WASHINGTON, April 9 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Team Hollywoodnews.com today announces that Dr. Jack Wheeler’s controversial news article, “Two Women In the Middle East” is building traction amongst Bloggers, citizen journalists and the mainstream media. As the story continues its momentum, Team Hollywood requests that all comments and inquiries be directed to Dr. Jack Wheeler’s website link, relating to the article, at http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/2721/44/ .

According to Blogger, Pundit 10, “Dr. Jack Wheeler’s Pelosi article is a primary example of the reasons that as Bloggers and citizen journalists, we no longer depend upon the mainstream media as our only, single source for stories to blog about. Had a Blooger not been a member of Dr. Jack Wheeler’s http://www.tothepointnews.com, the story of Moslem women and their desires for liberty and democracy would have been swept beneath the rug of Pelosi headscarf visuals.”

Dr. Jack Wheeler’s To The Point News.com article exposed one of the biggest stories circulating the Middle-East last week surrounding Nouriya Al- Subeeh; a Moslem woman, elected as a member of the Kuwaiti Parliament and Minister of Education, who broke the sacred “Sharia” Islamic by refusing to wear her headscarf in Parliament. The article tells the story, as Dr. Wheeler words in his article, “From the perspective of thoughtful Moslems that think it truly astonishing that so called ‘feminist’ American women don’t advocate freedom and equality for Moslem women.” In the view of those Moslem women, the House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s ’submission and inferiority’ to men “hijab” headscarf does not advocate freedom and equality for Moslem women.

Dr. Jack Wheeler, the Founder and creator of To The Point News.com is the man, many, including the Wall Street Journal call “the originator of the Reagan Doctrine.” He will continue providing newsworthy intel on recent Middle East relations, democracy in the Middle East and will continue his reports on the Islamo fascism movement that is also embraced by the worlds Moslem men and women favoring human rights, democracy and liberty.

Dr. Wheeler has often been called a “real life Indiana Jones” and is part of a mix of historical figures Stephen Spielberg used (along with his own imagination) to create his fictional character. In the 1980’s Dr. Wheeler conducted a series of extensive visits to anti-Soviet guerrilla insurgencies in Nicaragua, Angola, Mozambique, Ethiopia, Cambodia, Laos and Afghanistan and to democracy movements in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, becoming an unofficial liaison between them and the Reagan White House. Based on Dr. Wheeler’s experiences with Anti-Soviet insurgencies, Jack developed the strategy for dismantling the Soviet Empire adopted by the White House known as the “Reagan Doctrine.” It worked.

Dr. Wheeler writes in his controversial Speaker of the House Pelosi’s article, “There were two pictures taken this week of two women in the Middle East. Which woman do you think is a greater advocate of America’s most cherished values of Liberty and human rights?” Dr. Wheeler continues, “Which woman do you think has more courage to fight for these rights, and woman’s rights in particular? The picture of the woman wearing the Moslem headscarf or ‘hijab’ denoting submission and inferiority to men is American, Nancy Pelosi, who demeaned herself in front of the World in Damascus, Syria. The other picture of a woman wearing no headscarf is Nouriya Al-Subeeh, a Moslem who has been elected to the Kuwaiti Parliament and Minister of Education. Her picture was in every newspaper in the Middle East this week, as she refused to wear her headscarf in Parliament, provoking a furious reaction by Islamist parliamentarians, denouncing her for breaking sacred ‘Sharia’ Islamic Law. She smiled and in effect told them to get lost.”

http://www.kvoa.com/Global/story.asp?S=6347023&nav=menu216_5

Actually, there is. Pres Bush won’t talk to Assad. Someone has to. Congress does not set foreign policy, but they can certainly meet with foreign leaders to find common ground and overlapping interests.

This is not the first Congressional delegation in history to visit, and meet with, a foreign leader, you know?

Their is little to differentiate Assad and Nazrallah.

You probably meant “there is”, and I bet the Lebanese beg to differ.

(Such basic spelling errors, Varmint Genus -tsk, tsk, tsk)

The best type of negotiation with these leaders is the type that tamed Mohamar Quadaffi.

Er, that would be diplomacy, Varmint Genus, not any kind of military threat a la Bush Doctrine. After the Lockerbie trial, Lybia approached the British government and initiated the trilateral talks that eventually led to the announcement of Lybia’s decision to give up their WMDs program.

That is the type of negotiation you are talking about, yes?

Who is this SPEAKETTE of whom you speak, fake LAYWERETTE wish upon a star goddess? You’re st*pid c*nt.

The problem – there is no JUSTIFICATION for Nancy Pelosi to go to Syria and meet with Assad – NONE! Comment by valiant venus — April 11, 2007 @ 1:10 am

I call b*llsh*t. Peace in the region requires the engagement of the Syrians. You’re a fool, you st*pid little c*nt.

Their is little to differentiate Assad and Nazrallah. The best type of negotiation with these leaders is the type that tamed Mohamar Quadaffi. Good night! Comment by valiant venus — April 11, 2007 @ 1:10 am

Oh please. The *carrot* is what tamed Quadaffi, not the stick, you st*pid c*nt. Without the YEARS of negotiations and economic promises we made he wouldn’t have changed squat. And you st*pid c*nt, we’ve already been using those TAMING METHODS on Syria of decades.

How did you get so st*pid, were your parents siblings? Or do you have some genetic mental illness. I’ve seen st*pid, but you’re just downright embarrassingly borderline r*t*rded, you st*pid, st*pid c*nt.

Ah, the collective suicide talking point. Spoken like a true nazi h*llb*tch. Let me tell you idiot, there’s NOTHING useful about you, except to demonstrate exactly how st*pid you right wingnuts are.

You just contradicted yourself from the previous post, and destroyed your own arguments. Because you say we should negotiate, after arguing we shouldn’t negotiate.

It makes you look like Romney – another GOP Flip Flooooper. St*pid c*nt.

Syria, joined at the hip with Iran, have occupied Lebanon for years, fulmented terror through Hezbollah, killed more Americans than Al Queda and you want to “make nice”? Don’t forget the recent assasination of Lebanese politco Hariri (sp?) which started the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon. Comment by valiant venus — April 11, 2007 @ 1:02 am

Is that the same Lebanon that Israel also occupied a huge swath of? Put away your Zionism – we are talking about american politics, not Israeli. Traitor.

Ask yourself WHY Hezbollah kidnapped those israeli soldiers on the front WHEN they did. You might notice the timing was coincidentally timed with Iranian nuclear news…. Comment by valiant venus — April 11, 2007 @ 1:02 am

Uh, maybe because the Israelis were in Lebanese territory? So you are saying that the Israelis are so STUPID, they played right into the Iranian hands? I’m sure they’d be happy to know their little Jewish Girl from San Diego feels that way about their politics. St*pid c*nt.

Tooodles….
Comment by valiant venus — April 11, 2007 @ 1:02 am

More sh*t noises, from the toilet princess.

And Grgrrr, your argument attempts to justify the Speakettes’ junket. The problem – there is no JUSTIFICATION for Nancy Pelosi to go to Syria and meet with Assad – NONE! Their is little to differentiate Assad and Nazrallah. The best type of negotiation with these leaders is the type that tamed Mohamar Quadaffi.

Good night!

Syria, joined at the hip with Iran, have occupied Lebanon for years, fulmented terror through Hezbollah, killed more Americans than Al Queda and you want to “make nice”? Don’t forget the recent assasination of Lebanese politco Hariri (sp?) which started the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon.

Ask yourself WHY Hezbollah kidnapped those israeli soldiers on the front WHEN they did. You might notice the timing was coincidentally timed with Iranian nuclear news….

Tooodles….

No, the st*pid c*nt is not consistent, as she defend Gingrich on the previous thread which pointed out his hypocrisy. She’s a miserable c*nt, that simply believes that it’s OK to change the rules when the other party is in charge. She’s a st*pid inconsistent miserable c*nt, nothing more.

Why, because the believe in negotiating, instead of blustering macho b*llsh*t? Then ALL of your GOP leadership should be ASHAMED, because this has been a common practice for decades.

I also have no problem assigning a larger portion of my disgust toward the Speakette for the simple reason of her vastly more powerful position. Comment by valiant venus — April 11, 2007 @ 12:22 am

So then the other day, when you were defending the hypocrisy of Gingrich, you had no problem with him ACTIVELY undermining Clinton – something the SPEAKER didn’t do? There is no office of Speakette, there LAWYERETTE, ANOREXIETTE. Why do you hate women so much, that you must DEMEAN them? Is it self loathing? Is that why you’re so skinny you look like a 12 year old boy? Just get the sex change, and get it over with, you miserable little c*nt.

Syria, who is a Hezbollah conduit along with Iran, should be shunned by decent people everywhere – Republicans and Democrats alike! Comment by valiant venus — April 11, 2007 @ 12:22 am

Like China, when Nixon went there? Or Russia, when Reagan reached out?

You’re an idiot. One must normally visit a trailer park and do a drug deal to meet a *wo*man of your caliber.

Do us a favor, and go to Iraq, and stand in the market? Ok, st*pid c*nt?

I’m sure Speaker Pelosi is terribly concerned that she doesn’t have your approval, Hagfish.

Syria, who is a Hezbollah conduit along with Iran, should be shunned by decent people everywhere – Republicans and Democrats alike!
Comment by valiant venus

They should be shunned by decent people? I guess that leaves you out, doesn’t it, MA?

You can go back to flamethrowing now unless you actually want to discuss an issue.

Sorry you missed several of my posts, JP. I’ve noted that Repubs who went to Syria, should be ASHAMED of themselves! I also have no problem assigning a larger portion of my disgust toward the Speakette for the simple reason of her vastly more powerful position.

Syria, who is a Hezbollah conduit along with Iran, should be shunned by decent people everywhere – Republicans and Democrats alike!

You may want to keep up: There was a Congressional Republican delegation in Syria before Pelosi’s visit and another one after. And there were Republican Congressmen in Pelosi’s delegation too.

So much for the “isolating Syria” talking point.

Also, Pelosi told Pres Bush of her impending visit before she went to Syrian and he didn’t object.

It is true that it is the Executive branch makes foreign policy. But Pres Bush’s policy towards Syria is non-existent beyond rhetoric and a few easy slogans. Moreover, what Pelosi and other Congress people expected to accomplish was to fulfill their own Constitutional duties, since they are in charge of the strings to the purse.

Sorry, jag, it IS a Republican/Democrat thing because we don’t hear you righty toads talking about the Republicans that went to Syria and told Assad they didn’t agree with Bush.