Perino ‘Defends’ Email Statements: I Didn’t Lie, I Just Had No Idea What I Was Talking About
Perino ‘Defends’ Email Statements: I Didn’t Lie, I Just Had No Idea What I Was Talking About
In this afternoon’s press briefing, the White House press corps confronted spokeswoman Dana Perino about her previous misstatements regarding the White House’s use of RNC email accounts. On March 27, Perino claimed that there were only a “handful” of staffers with such accounts. Today, Perino claimed that her earlier statement was made despite her ignorance of what was actually going on. “Well, I didn’t know how many there were,” Perino said. “I grant you, it’s a very large handful.”
CNN’s White House correspondent Ed Henry then pressed her on why she had earlier stated that RNC emails had been archived for a very long time when the White House now claims that those emails have been lost. On March 27, Perino said RNC archiving was “something that was in place” for years. Today, she backed off that statement and said, “We have developed a better understanding of how the RNC archived or did not archive certain e-mails.” She refused to further elaborate.
Watch it:
Perino defended herself, arguing, “When I said a ‘handful,’ I was asked based on something that I didn’t know.” Apparently, Perino believes if you don’t know the truth, you’re allowed to make up whatever you want.
Transcript:
QUESTION: On March 27th, at this podium, you said that there were only a handful of White House aides who had used political RNC accounts. Now you’re saying 22; that doesn’t sound like a handful.
PERINO: Well, I didn’t know how many there were. And I think that, again, if you look at the number of people that work at the White House, almost 2,000, to have 22 people that — I mean, obviously, I grant you it’s a very large handful, but it’s still a relatively small number.
And it’s based on the people who have responsibilities — both White House official responsibilities but that also have responsibilities, in their job description, to do political activities.
And to make sure that they didn’t violate the Hatch Act, they had access to this other equipment.
QUESTION: But then the L.A. Times, today, quotes Scott (inaudible) as saying that there were about 50 aides.
PERINO: I think the 22 is current — current White House employees.
PERINO: We’re looking — if you have 50 over the course of the administration.
QUESTION: At that March 27th briefing as well, you said that Fred Fielding, the White House counsel, was in touch with the RNC general counsel to make sure that there was archiving taking place. And when pressed on it, you said that these were not archived just since Henry Waxman had asked you about it on the Hill, that they had been archived for a very long time. So how would…
PERINO: And I think that’s going back to those a few weeks ago. This is how we have developed a better understanding of how the RNC archived or did not archive certain e-mails. As I said, folks like Karl Rove, e-mails using this equipment, go back to being archived to 2004.
The extent of how many people had these accounts, I didn’t have it readily at my fingertips. I understood it to be a handful of people. I knew that it would be at least some, if not all, of the people that worked in the Office of Political Affairs.
[…]
QUESTION: But what you’ve said has shifted even over the last couple of weeks.
PERINO: Give me an example of that.
QUESTION: Fifty, 22, handful.
PERINO: And I explained that. I think — you have to admit that when I said a handful I was asked based on something that I didn’t know.
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
That sounds like a post one of the trolls here would make. They don’t LIE, they just don’t know anything about what they’re saying!
April 12th, 2007 at 3:22 pmIgnorance is bliss…
Republican thinking in a nutshell
April 12th, 2007 at 3:24 pmI’m guessing the first question on the White House Press Secretary’s employment application is:
April 12th, 2007 at 3:25 pm“Can you speak endlessly without knowing what you are saying?”
I want to be mad, but in the back of my mind I cannot completely dismiss the possibility that Dana Perino really is an empty-headed incompetent, rather than a mendacious aparatchik.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:26 pmDidn’t someone else state that these are the facts as we now know them and the earlier facts were facts then but….. It’s in the same strain as “Known knowns….”
She’s going to be fun to watch for the next month.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:27 pmPurr-ino, you can lie to me any day you want. Lovely GOP kitten, meow!
April 12th, 2007 at 3:27 pmcould those white house reporters end up with cancer, from having that much smoke blown up their asses every day? wow.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:28 pmThe Nixon Party thinks knowledge is determined by belief. Dana ate the pudding and now believes whatever lie she tells, which makes it true. This is how we got into a war - Bush knew that Saddam had WMD.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:28 pmyes, by all means, this should be the top priority. Meanwhile, the Dems are inviting the Moslem Brotherhood to speak before Congress.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:29 pmOK, Republicans: just admit that you’re too stupid to be useful for anything and we’ll leave you alone.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:29 pm.
So, Dana, darling, can you give us a good reason why we should believe anything you ever say, ever again?
April 12th, 2007 at 3:30 pmyeah, I don’t care. she’s awesome.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:30 pmPERINO: And I explained that. I think — you have to admit that when I said a handful I was asked based on something that I didn’t know.
Spectacular! When in doubt, make something up. Is that #3 on the Republican 10 commandments?
April 12th, 2007 at 3:32 pm“We know where they are. They’re in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.” –Rumsfeld, on Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction
“when I said a handful I was asked based on something that I didn’t know”
To say “I know” when you don’t is a LIE!
April 12th, 2007 at 3:32 pmThese are the people who are supposed to be protecting your family and are running a war in your name.
Pathetic.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:33 pmyeah, I don’t care. she’s awesome.
Comment by jimmy — April 12, 2007 @ 3:30 pm
Thats what the White House was hoping you’d say when they decided to put her out there.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:33 pmDana may have landed her job because she is the pert, perky and pretty representation of the perfect republican woman, but she is also a representative of an empty-headed blonde stereotype. But when this doesn’t have a clue, she simply lies with impunity. Therefore, she went all the way to the Oval office.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:33 pmShort Perino:
I am not a liar. I am stupid. Big difference.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:33 pmMan, she’s a hottie.
I guess y’all will have to high tail over to india if you want them back!
April 12th, 2007 at 3:33 pmyes, by all means, this should be the top priority. Meanwhile, the Dems are inviting the Moslem Brotherhood to speak before Congress.
Comment by Dale
Given that the repubs don’t know the difference between Shia and Sunnis, shouldn’t at least some grown-ups speak to these people? I guess in your eyes everyone who is a Muslim is a terrorist, huh? Maybe we can learn from these folks - since Dumbya doesn’t do any of that learnin’ stuff. Why can’t we speak with these people? Why are you so afraid?
April 12th, 2007 at 3:34 pmGood thing the NSA has tapped into the telephone and internet out there in San Fransisco. I am sure they have backups of all those “missing” emails.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:35 pmWho would have thought their illegal eavesdropping would actually come in handy?
For the sake of convenience, Dana, we’ll just assume that you’re talking out of your ass unless you indicate otherwise. Just give us a signal–maybe a little tug on the ear—to let us know when you’re saying something that you really know to be true.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:35 pmDale (9),
Besides being completely off topic, that link was utterly pathetic. Do you really believe something so poorly supported???
April 12th, 2007 at 3:36 pmGreggp - she’s a fembot - if it hasn’t been programed in there, it can’t be repeated back. What would really be fun is for the press gaggle to confuse her so much she shorts out and sparks and smoke pour out of her ears!
April 12th, 2007 at 3:37 pmThese multiple scandals (AG, Emails, Iraq intelligence, Tilden/Lynch, Walter Reed) are reaching a point of critical mass for the WH. I think it is only a matter of time before we have either an announcement of a serious terrorist threat thwarted (or heaven forbid, a domestic terrorist attack) or military strikes on Iran / Syria. This WH is inhabited by insane people and they are cornered. This could get very ugly and dangerous.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:37 pmYou’re kidding me, right? Do you have any idea of some of the alumni of the MB? How about al-Zawahiri or Sayyid Qutb
And any “talking” your “grownups” in Congress do, BY LAW, should be following the foreign policy as stated by Pres. Bush; otherwise you’re in violation of the Logan Act.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:40 pmit’s obivious that tony wasn’t shiny enough to distract the press for long, perino is a very shiny object.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:40 pmShorter Dana Peroxide: “when in doubt, make shit up. It worked when the boss started his bullshit war.”
April 12th, 2007 at 3:40 pmAs some of the comments have noted, Dumbya’s administration is founded, has been run, and got re-elected on the principle of just making sh*t up. Not all that different from the way corporate America works. But if us little people try it we are likely to get in big trouble.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:40 pmWhat a helmet-haired ho.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:41 pm#23, okay hotshot… how about this link, which is the MB’s English website. Notice in here (if you bother reading it) how they’re reiterating their position that Hamas is NOT a terrorist organization.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:43 pmWhat’s her next job?
April 12th, 2007 at 3:45 pmyes, by all means, this should be the top priority. Meanwhile, the Dems are inviting the Moslem Brotherhood to speak before Congress.
Comment by Dale
So? Is there a reason why your off-topic news is more important than the topic of this thread, Dale?
What about Dana the Ditz, who, when confronted with something she doesn’t know, makes shit up instead of saying, “I don’t know.”
April 12th, 2007 at 3:45 pmPlease stop encouraging the troll who is off-topic.
Although you gotta admit “the foreign policy as stated by Bush” is funny.
I seriously doubt he has the mental capacity to state his own foreign policy in complete and coherent sentences.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:46 pmAnd what’s so hard to understand… the MB is a DIRECT ENEMY of the US.
In other words, THEY are partly responsible for KILLING OUR SOLDIERS! And the DEMS are talking about inviting them to speak before Congress, and YOU’RE BLOWING IT OFF!
April 12th, 2007 at 3:46 pm#33, yeah Zooey, as I’ve stated… the Dems are meeting w/the people who’re KILLING OUR SOLDIERS! Forget about partisan politics… don’t any of you feel this is WRONG?
April 12th, 2007 at 3:47 pmDale, you’re short-circuiting . . . lay off the goat semen.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:48 pmI guess y’all will have to high tail over to india if you want them back!
Comment by Real DRedNeck — April 12, 2007 @ 3:33 pm
Actually if it turns out that official White House emails were being stored offsite on a server in India, then it will be the White House hi tailing it over to India to retrieve them.
Assuming they want to stay out of jail.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:50 pmthe Dems are meeting w/the people who’re KILLING OUR SOLDIERS! Forget about partisan politics… don’t any of you feel this is WRONG?
Comment by Dale — April 12, 2007 @ 3:47 pm
Uhhh….no.
Establishing relations with hostile nations are a standard practice and have been for thousands of years.
Besides.
You guys meet with them too.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:52 pmSo if she doesn’t know what she’s talking about, why doesn’t she do us all a little good and just give us a good show.
Meet everyone down at the local strip joint? Oh, that’s right, ReichWingNuts don’t like s*x. So she’s completely useless.
Next!
April 12th, 2007 at 3:52 pmI think this administration has gone beyond gross incompetence and is definitely into “Nixonian-like” criminality. They’ve NO IDEA whether or not the RNC archives its e-mails but they can go ahead and use its servers and e-mail anyway, despite the law that says it all has to be preserved? OR DID THEY KNOW?
Can you be both incompetent AND evil at the same time?
April 12th, 2007 at 3:53 pmActually, Bush and Cheney are tied in with the SAUDIS,
the ones that KILLED OUR PEOPLE ON 9/11.
There is a Saudi prince nicknamed “Bandar Bush” by the Bush family.
WHY does the “president” associate with the PEOPLE WHO KILLED
AND CONTINUE TO FINANCE THE TERRORISTS???
i.e. The Saudis?????
April 12th, 2007 at 3:53 pmRemember Bush was going to restore honor and dignity to the Whitehouse. Also, all of my Republican friends were tired of the”lies” that came out of the Clinton Whitehouse.
Funny, Bill Clinton is starting to look like Thomas Jefferson compared to Bush.
-GSD
April 12th, 2007 at 3:54 pmDale (31),
That link is pretty pathetic too. Where does it say anything about speaking before congress?
It does say that the delegation had 7 Democrats and 4 Republicans in it, though.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:55 pmLying Hoo-er
April 12th, 2007 at 3:55 pmI believe Perino means ‘flea brain’ in Italian.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:56 pmIf she did not know, then she is incompetant. If she did know, then she lied like a rug. In either case, she needs to go.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:56 pmThis one is serious folks. Real serious.
Forget what the emails might have said.
You don’t destroy evidence.
Records and evidence tampering is a serious crime and is called Obstruction, and it is punishable by impeachment for the administration and possible jail time for many or all of the players.
Congress has grounds for impeachment now. Obstruction.
Lets make it stick.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:56 pmD. Purrino:
“I think, to the best of my knowledge, I think, with the information I have, I think I am explaining this to the best of my abilities.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:59 pmI think.”
I think it’s a handful, I don’t think it’s a lot.
Here is her quote, she is not trying to make anything up. She did not know which is why she said the work think.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:59 pmAt Least Ditzy Dana got something accurate when she said “she didn’t know what she was talking about”. It’s embarrassingly and painfully clear that she’s a GOP airhead. Now that’s she’s been caught in a bold-faced lie, she’s toast! The next time that nitwit comes on to make an official statement, everyone will simply turn their televisions off! She’s a fraud and a shameful sycophant.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:00 pmThe Logan Act? WTF? It’s a dead letter, never used, a leftover of an eighteenth-century controversy.
Yeah, troll, I’m sure they’ll get right on that.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:00 pm.
Dana Perino = Another “Fall Guy” For the Bush Administration
April 12th, 2007 at 4:00 pmShe didn’t lie, she just improvised. Kind of like the boy King does. Ya see, if you have no idea what you’re saying, there is a chance that it could be true.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:01 pm#40.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:01 pmremember ‘Naked Weather’?
This is clearly another case of “obstruction of justice” by this white house. Their time is up now. The people are ready to vomit with the lies and the corruption. Destroying prima facie evidence is a very “high crime” in the obstruction of justice trial which will soon be taking place.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:02 pmAnd, obstruction of justice is precisely what got Nixon axed! Bush needs to go! NOW!
April 12th, 2007 at 4:02 pmIn other words, THEY are partly responsible for KILLING OUR SOLDIERS!
Uh, yeah. And I guess since I clapped for Tinkerbell as a child I technically gave birth to her.
Speaking in Republican terms, that is.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:03 pm.
Well, Dana certainly didn’t last very long before making a pure, unadulterated idiot of herself, did she? Once an airhead/always an airhead! And, yes, to the poster above: Clinton IS Thomas Jefferson when placed next to Bush.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:03 pmWell, I guess we can call her an attractive liar.
-GSD
April 12th, 2007 at 4:05 pmCan’t wait to see Ditzy Dana Airhead field questions about the contradictions in the 911 story! That one may net her an Academy Award.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:05 pmShe’s horrendous, but it would take dinner and a night in a hotel to determine exactly HOW horrendous…
April 12th, 2007 at 4:05 pm#33, yeah Zooey, as I’ve stated… the Dems are meeting w/the people who’re KILLING OUR SOLDIERS! Forget about partisan politics… don’t any of you feel this is WRONG?
Comment by Dale
Gee, I don’t know Dale. As long as they don’t arrive in this country with bombs strapped to their chests, I’m going to think of this as a diplomatic effort.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:05 pmIf the Whitehouse press corps had one iota of integrity they would just stop showing up.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:06 pmDana is clearly in over her head. Anyone who takes a position like this has to have a death wish. That’s precisely why no one is biting on the “war czar” position….what a joke! It shows you where the GOP mentality lies - war profiteering all the way!
If they had a soul, they’d be searching for a “PEACE CZAR” instead.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:06 pmThats right Veritas.
It needs to become a chant until we drill it into the Congresses heads.
OBSTRUCTION
April 12th, 2007 at 4:06 pmWhile this young lady seems to think she can scate on her look’s, I have watched her presentation’s several time’s and am reminded of what my old grannie Mac told me.” Pretty is as pretty doe’s ” and after having said that she is not at all pretty to me…I even prefer Snow flake to her and that’s pretty far down the list of people I want to watch lie and twist in the wind….I find her down right costic in fact…..Blessings
April 12th, 2007 at 4:07 pmRE: #50
April 12th, 2007 at 4:07 pmMy point exactly, hydrophobic hare, she uses the word think constantly in her utterances. It is a subtle disclaimer to everything she says.
Thank you for supporting my obviously smack on observation!
mccain fanclub? i misspeak. and ill do it again?
April 12th, 2007 at 4:08 pm#41 The executive decision to utilize the RNC accounts for official business CLEARLY is in violation of the Presidential Records Act. There’s no two ways about it or around it. This act is criminal and needs to be prosecuted.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:08 pmYou’re kidding me, right? Do you have any idea of some of the alumni of the MB? How about al-Zawahiri or Sayyid Qutb
Comment by Dale — April 12, 2007 @ 3:40 pm
They were apart of the Muslim Brotherhood when the group was trying to kill Sadat and start an Islamic revolution in Egypt. Sayyid (Zawahiri’s mentor) was killed by Sadat’s regime and Zawahiri went off and founded what is known today as Al Qaeda.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:08 pmIn other words, THEY are partly responsible for KILLING OUR SOLDIERS!
Comment by Gale — April 12, 2007 @ 3:46 pm
Well, if you put it that way, then Bush is also “partly responsible for killing our soldiers”.
:|
Since he sent them there and all…….
April 12th, 2007 at 4:08 pmAnd, there is absolutely NO WAY that Bush didn’t okay this with so many of his people using it. For cripes sakes, he probably used it himself! (but he doesn’t email….yeah, right! is that just like ‘we don’t torture’….buy that one and I’ve got some land…..)
April 12th, 2007 at 4:09 pmSo everyone stop meeting with Bush.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:09 pmIOKIYAB.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:09 pmWhat is it about these people that they continually supply either a “non-answer” or an answer
April 12th, 2007 at 4:10 pmeasily shown to be erroneous? It’s a “live for the moment” mentality akin to a a kindergartner
with a mouth full of bubbles earnestly denying that he just ate the paste.
And I see Jack Abramoff, who had intimate knowledge about the use of these e-mail accounts, is being considered for a reduced sentence for his continuing cooperation with investigators and prosecutors; perhaps we should have him testify before congress, as well.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:11 pmThis daily onslaught of filth and the weekly avalanche of scandals and abuses of power definitely indicates that this administration can no longer be supported. The people voted during the midterms because, at that time, they were sick of the corruption (not in Washington per se as Wingnut would have us believe) but precisely and specifically the corruption in THIS administration.
The people no longer support this president or his administration. He has abused his power and has destroyed the trust of the american people. Until he is brought to justice, this trust will not be restored. Bringing him and his cadre of liars to justice is Step One in the healing process of this fractured democracy.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:11 pmFour and twenty traitorous bushie-birds baked to perfection in a quagmire lie-pie. Quite a handful to cover up for a young lady who LA Speaks…
April 12th, 2007 at 4:11 pmMy point exactly, hydrophobic hare, she uses the word think constantly in her utterances. It is a subtle disclaimer to everything she says.
Thank you for supporting my obviously smack on observation!
Comment by Raven — April 12, 2007 @ 4:07 pm
Exactly, she didn’t lie. How many people have had questions come up at work and you say something like “I think he’s in the conference room” that is not saying he is in the conference room. It is just an educated guess.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:11 pmDag She’s Hawt …why… I ‘d just love to see her in a pillbox hat…. and a dress suit with BIG buttons ….whitegloves …carrying a Bible..yea…hehhh…..hehhhh…hehhhhhhh…heehhhhhh
April 12th, 2007 at 4:11 pmshould be following the foreign policy as stated by Pres. Bush
April 12th, 2007 at 4:12 pmComment by Dale
Foreign policy? You mean bomb countries (Iraq) or give them money to support terrorism (NK).
In other words, THEY are partly responsible for KILLING OUR SOLDIERS!
Comment by Dale — April 12, 2007 @ 3:46 pm
If being “partly responsible for KILLING OUR SOLDIERS” was the criterion by which we decide whether or not to talk to people, Dimwit Dale, nobody would be talking to Bush/Cheney/Rove right now — after all, they’re responsible for killing FAR more of our soldiers than any boogeyman you’re dreaming up in your off-topic rants.
There — we’ve run circles around you logically. Now take your tinfoil hat and crawl back under your rock.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:12 pmHey, you boys aren’t supposed to listen to what I say, you’re supposed to just stare at my tits.
I see that a number of you are on board and it would be great if you could get the others to go along with you as well.
Oooh, look over there, American Idol did something…
April 12th, 2007 at 4:14 pmHi Sharon! Hope your day is going well. I loved your post except that I feel that the only way “pretty” could be applied to Dana Perino is when using the description: Pretty diabolical. Unfortunately, she thinks that whatever kind of looks she thinks she has will be enough and that truth doesn’t matter. She’s learning very quickly that Truth is everything and a hairstyle and an inch of heavy makeup are meaningless. I believe she epitomizes the term: airhead because that’s what it truly means - someone believing that all they need is a new outfit, contemporary hairstyle and a mountain of makeup to be considered relevant…..Wrong! But we should all send Dana an appropriate message: Thank you for playing, Dana but you’re clearly out of your league.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:15 pmThey’re not just ‘establishing relations’; they’re inviting them to speak before Congress. Can you imagine inviting Hitler to speak before Congress?
In any event, as has been pointed out, I *did* go off-topic. I won’t post any more about this; missing emails is MUCH more important.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:16 pmDag She’s Hawt …why… I ‘d just love to see her in a pillbox hat…. and a dress suit with BIG buttons ….whitegloves …carrying a Bible..yea…hehhh…..hehhhh…hehhhhhhh…heehhhhhh
Comment by horny old pug — April 12, 2007 @ 4:11 pm
:|
Theres an image I’m not going to be able to shake anytime soon…..
April 12th, 2007 at 4:16 pmSee, #80’s on board! I didn’t lie, I just merely spoke a non-truth. Everybody does it, but not as cute as I do…teehee
April 12th, 2007 at 4:16 pm#83 don’t waste your breath on Dale. He’s our psychiatrically compromised multiple personality disorder tragic troll. We know his other monikers and steer clear, lest we risk contamination ourselves.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:16 pmUnfortunately, she thinks that whatever kind of looks she thinks she has will be enough and that truth doesn’t matter.
Comment by veritas — April 12, 2007 @ 4:15 pm
I don’t know if thats what she thinks, but its certainly what the White House was thinking when they put her in front of the cameras.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:18 pmComment by rabidbunny
Which might be true, if her predecessor hadn’t been caught lying about Rove’s involement with the Plame affair. How many times must you be lied to, before you quit the cultish adoration for this administration?
April 12th, 2007 at 4:18 pm“A very large handful”?? Guess that’s Dana’s measuring stick for her upper torso (wishful thinking on her part)…that a very large handful would mean something greater than a AAA cup. Heh!
April 12th, 2007 at 4:18 pmOther monikers? You’ve gone over the edge, veritas. I’ve *never* posted on this site as anyone other than myself, as a check by TP of their server logs will prove.
Of course, I guess when you see conspiracies under every rock…
April 12th, 2007 at 4:21 pmSee, #80’s on board! I didn’t lie, I just merely spoke a non-truth. Everybody does it, but not as cute as I do…teehee
Clearly when she said it she was not sure. So it is not a lie or non-truth.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:21 pm#80
April 12th, 2007 at 4:22 pmYou know, as well as I know, that the syntax with which the word is used is putting a space in between the speaker, and what they say.
It is used in this manner so that if they are ever challenged they can state they were not intentionally lying.
Your technical defense of Perrino clearly betrays your own tactics of distortion and conivery.
For more on the RNC email scam as well as the latest news, email archives, hearings, legal filings and other essential documents on the Bush DOJ prosecutor firings, see:
April 12th, 2007 at 4:23 pm“The U.S. Attorney Scandal Documents.”
Comment by rabidbunny
Which might be true, if her predecessor hadn’t been caught lying about Rove’s involement with the Plame affair. How many times must you be lied to, before you quit the cultish adoration for this administration?
Comment by barfly
I’m just looking at this individual incident. She is not stating with any certainy, she is just trying to answer as many questions as she can, she thought it was something and it was higher.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:24 pmIt is just an educated guess. Rabid Bunny
So, what you’re really saying is that an incompetent administration should be represented by an incompetent spokesperson? Now that makes sense!
April 12th, 2007 at 4:26 pmThey’re not just ‘establishing relations’; they’re inviting them to speak before Congress.
Comment by Dale — April 12, 2007 @ 4:16 pm
Uh, yea. Thats because in order to talk to them, they have to….. you know…..talk to them.
What better place then in the Congress where all Congressmen can address them?
And as for your Hitler comment, Hitler didn’t talk to his enemies either.
He invaded them.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:27 pmAgain, #94 sees the light. It even speaks as if it knew what was in my head at the time.
Now, if I undo the top two button on my blouse, will you believe me if I tell you that the Iraq situation is improving? Well, besides that cutsy little bunny thing, it believes anything we say. Obviously it is a great patriot and we need more people to be just like it.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:28 pmshe is just trying to answer as many questions as she can, she thought it was something and it was higher.
Comment by rabidbunny — April
Um, substantially higher; not even comparable. “A handful” is five, perhaps six or seven, but fifty?
April 12th, 2007 at 4:29 pmSo, what you’re really saying is that an incompetent administration should be represented by an incompetent spokesperson? Now that makes sense!
Comment by barfly — April 12, 2007 @ 4:26 pm
Not having all information on a single matter and being incompetent are two completely different things.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:29 pmall Bush spokespeople don’t know what they’re talking about…
April 12th, 2007 at 4:29 pmBush: Meet Nixon
April 12th, 2007 at 4:29 pmWhich might be true, if her predecessor hadn’t been caught lying about Rove’s involement with the Plame affair. How many times must you be lied to, before you quit the cultish adoration for this administration?
Comment by barfly
That is why they are rabidFunnies. Even after Foley, Abramoff, Delay, Cunningham, Safavian and the rest of the shennanigans, corruption,outright lies (such as Perinos I didn’t know lie, the billions lost in Iraq, the corrupt billions looted in Iraq, the WMD that has never been found, the quagmire war that has gone on for 4 years instead of 6 months, the wackos still think Bush talks to God and should be excused for such incompetence because he’s a fake christian
No matter Clinton did it PALES in comparison to this group of wacked out dipensationalist tribulationist Tim Lahaye fanatics Bushists and utterly insane and inane cultish rabidbunnys’.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:29 pmSorry Viritas, I should of followed it up with I think by her action’s she is a ugly POS…..LOL.Love your post’s as alway’s…Hey 1Worfeus, we are still here to fight another day..LOL..Blessings
April 12th, 2007 at 4:29 pm“large handful” sounds kind of Orwellian to me…
April 12th, 2007 at 4:29 pmThanks for the thread, Angry One! It’s a great one and everyone should bookmark it in order to stay on top of this developing scandal which will, undoubtedly, result in the impeachment of this president.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:30 pm“I didn’t lie, I just had no idea what I was talking about…you know…because there are unknown knowns, and then there are known unknowns, and then there are unknown unknowns…I think…tee hee.”
April 12th, 2007 at 4:31 pmI’m just looking at this individual incident. She is not stating with any certainy, she is just trying to answer as many questions as she can, she thought it was something and it was higher.
Comment by rabidbunny
If you don’t know your supposed to take the fifth and then resign, like Goodling did!
LMAO!!!
April 12th, 2007 at 4:31 pmNot having all information on a single matter and being incompetent are two completely different things. Comment by rabidbunny — April 12, 2007 @ 4:29 pm
Yet you republicans find the ability to succeed at both of these. The combination of ignorance and incompetence. The true mark of a republican. But then again, lets not forget misplaced arrogance, of which you and your *brethren* have in abundance.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:32 pm“large handful” sounds like of Freudian to me…
April 12th, 2007 at 4:32 pmBush: Meet Nixon
Comment by verita
At least Nixon had the decency to resign after illegal warrantless wiretaps!!
April 12th, 2007 at 4:33 pmSure it will… that’s said each and every time a ’scandal’ is overblown.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:36 pmSo she didn’t “lie” she also didn’t know what the hell she was talking about earlier and leaves big doubts if she knows what she’s talking about now. This is what the madhopper is hanging his hat on.
Thanks again anrgy one for the link. all documented.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:36 pmNot having all information on a single matter and being incompetent are two completely different things. Comment by rabidbunny
Sooooo, If a Doctor doesn’t get a single matter right, and cuts off the wrong body part, they are not incompetent? They should not be sued?
Good God RabidFunny, you are really trying to polish this turd of an administration. They don’t know, they forget, they misremember, they take the fifth, yet they are supposed to be Americas best and brightest?
WTF?????????????????????
April 12th, 2007 at 4:38 pm#99 1 Worfeus, Hitler invaded them..With that post I am again reminded of the fact heir bush is the grand son of prescott bush, the nazi supporter….The old apple falling from the tree thingie…..Some thing’s never realy change they just change their suits…Blessings
April 12th, 2007 at 4:39 pmOh, oh!
Visit: http://OsiSpeaks.com or http://OsiSpeaks.org
April 12th, 2007 at 4:39 pmNot having all information on a single matter and being incompetent are two completely different things.
Comment by rabidbunny
Or; one is an indicator of larger, as-yet-unmanifested incompetencies.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:39 pm#86 Dale
…missing emails is MUCH more important.
And you know what’s even more important than that, Dale? Hiding e-mails and lying about them, saying they’re lost. Hiding them because they reveal illegal activity in the White House–revealing even more illegal activity than was already revealed by the mere fact that they were using commercial e-mail systems to communicate from within the White House.
Here’s a funny one. Stanzel claims they were using the non-official e-mail addresses to keep from violating the Hatch Act. If you saw Lurita Doan’s testimony, you know that they used those unofficial e-mail addresses in the course of violating the Hatch Act. In fact, they didn’t give a flying f*ck about the Hatch Act.
What makes you proudest of the Bushies, Dale? Is it the way they can get caught in one lie after another, each one more ridiculously far-fetched than the one before it, and they just keep on slingin’ the shit without so much as batting an eye? Is that what turns you on about these crooked little f*cks, Dale?
If you really don’t believe that they did anything wrong…okay that’s just silly. You can’t be that stupid. But, if, hypothetically speaking, you were so dense that you honestly didn’t think that the Bush administration was up to its eyeballs in real legal trouble right now, boy oh boy would you be in for a shock when it all comes down. You should practice that expression of shock so that it looks convincing when Rove, et al are trotted off to the slammer and you pretend that you have no idea what it’s all about.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:42 pmSure it will… that’s said each and every time a ’scandal’ is overblown.
Comment by Dale
Yeh you shills said that about Delay, Abramoff, Foley, Cunningham, Safavian, port deals, Foggo and everything else!!
April 12th, 2007 at 4:43 pmIf the email is being hosted by a commercial company then the RNC had no hand in whether the emails were maintained or not. SmartechCorp.Net should be the ones asked about the retention of electronic data.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:47 pmNo, I think it’s the fact that sad people like you have been saying for 6 years that impeachment is only one congressional hearing away, yet you keep missing the mark.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:47 pmopposition to hysterical wackos-bent-on-destruction should be an equal opportunity avocation, and I don’t think a lot of people here actually make the mistake of “lending aid” to foreign wackos by condemning the domestic variety.
- kinky piece of logic that gets played way too often
April 12th, 2007 at 4:48 pmStanzel claims they were using the non-official e-mail addresses to keep from violating the Hatch Act.
Yet they were doing it during working hours!! Lets see their time cards and see if they punched out on the clock before using the other computers!!!
If these people worked for VapidBunny or Dale, or me, they/I would have fired their ass!!
April 12th, 2007 at 4:49 pmIf a person “knows nothing” about a certain subject, wouldn’t it be easier to simply say “I’m not privy to information on this subject…”???
No no no, it’s much better to “stick foot in mouth”
biznatch.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:51 pmNo, I think it’s the fact that sad people like you have been saying for 6 years that impeachment is only one congressional hearing away, yet you keep missing the mark. Comment by Dale — April 12, 2007 @ 4:47 pm
Actually, it’s a few seats in the Senate away. The partisan Republicans wouldn’t vote to impeach no matter what crimes were committed - most of us *progressives* know that.
What’s sad, is how few of you CONS know or care about the corruption and criminality of this administration. You’re too fixated on *winning* and making fun of the untouchability of your criminal leaders.
You’re a sad, pathetic excuse for a decent human being Dale. I hope your momma is proud of the piece of sh*t she brought into this world.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:52 pmNo, I think it’s the fact that sad people like you have been saying for 6 years that impeachment is only one congressional hearing away, yet you keep missing the mark.
Comment by Dale
Sad is people like you who keep covering up for the culture of corruption.
Would you also cover for a bank robber or a drug dealer? Why would you do that? Are you corrupt? I guess you would also want your favorite football team to cheat so they could win? Do you cheat at cards? On your wife or girlfriend?
April 12th, 2007 at 4:53 pmSure it will… that’s said each and every time a ’scandal’ is overblown. Comment by Dale — April 12, 2007 @ 4:36 pm
Overblown? BAHAHAHA, yeah, sure. Don’t you mean *under-investigated*, by the criminally complicit republicans in Congress? Too bad for you that Congress changed hands recently. You used to be able to claim overblown, because you could sit your fat st*pid *sses on the investigations and avoid accountability. That’s why you’re here deflecting and attempting to downplay. You now have to face the music, and you’re trying to convince yourself it will remain the way it has for the past 6 years. With scandals just - going away. Thanks to the culture of corruption in Congress.
Guess what sport. You’re a delusional, st*pid little f*ckhead. Who needs to impeach? It’s fine just causing several of your senators to lose their seats, and bloodying your cowardly noses so badly you lose most of the elections in 2008. It’s payback sport. You guys have played hardball in politics for so long, you’re finally getting back a dose of the sh*t you’ve put out. The difference this time - compared to during the Clintons - is that you really ARE criminals!
April 12th, 2007 at 4:56 pm#123 Dale
No, I think it’s the fact that sad people like you have been saying for 6 years that impeachment is only one congressional hearing away, yet you keep missing the mark.
I don’t think anyone has been saying that. Certainly not for the past 6 years. There’s no way it was going to happen while the rubber stampers were in charge. So, realistically, we’re only talking about 100 days in which there’s been any hope of an impeachment. I suspect that, as GOP congressmen start to see their hopes of re-election slip away, they ‘ll start to warm up to the idea of impeachment.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:57 pmNo matter Clinton did it PALES in comparison to this group of wacked out dipensationalist tribulationist Tim Lahaye fanatics Bushists and utterly insane and inane cultish rabidbunnys’.
Sure, tell that to the Sammy Burglars of the world.
April 12th, 2007 at 4:57 pmSooooo, If a Doctor doesn’t get a single matter right, and cuts off the wrong body part, they are not incompetent? They should not be sued?
Good God RabidFunny, you are really trying to polish this turd of an administration. They don’t know, they forget, they misremember, they take the fifth, yet they are supposed to be Americas best and brightest?
WTF?????????????????????
How many doctors do you know give press conferences and answer questions on the spot and then do surgery then? I have had doctors say I think you have the flu and it turn out to be worse. Was he lying? Of course not he was working with the information he had. Sorry bad anology on your part.
April 12th, 2007 at 5:03 pmOr; one is an indicator of larger, as-yet-unmanifested incompetencies.
Comment by barfly — April 12, 2007 @ 4:39 pm
Perhaps-Perhaps not.
April 12th, 2007 at 5:04 pmIt’s FUNNY watching Perino, McClellan, Snowjob, and NappyBunny trying to defend
TREASONOUS LIARS like Bush, Cheney, and Gonzales!!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
April 12th, 2007 at 5:09 pmIt’s REALLY FUNNY to see people trying to defend her. I wish I could make a logic equation for this, ‘when I said X before, I had no idea what I was talking about.’ Huh?
Now that I know what I am talking about the answer is Y.
Handful? Fistful? Shovelful? Bucketful?
How about shitload?
By the way, I find her very unattractive. Ignorance is ugly.
April 12th, 2007 at 5:32 pmHelen Thomas is much better looking to me.
Sure, tell that to the Sammy Burglars of the world.
Comment by rabidbunny — April 12, 2007 @ 4:57 pm
Wow, you actually think taking a paper COPY of an item out of archive, is the same thing as the mass corruption and dishonesty of this administration? You really are completely foolish and dishonest to yourself.
Perhaps-Perhaps not.
Comment by rabidbunny — April 12, 2007 @ 5:04 pm
There’s enough evidence in, that if you believe the perhaps not, either you’re lying to yourself, or you are the one exhibiting the incompetence.
April 12th, 2007 at 5:40 pmThat someone in the Government, has tried to use the
excuse, that Emails have been “Lost” just shows how
stupid they think the public is. Any IT Manager worth
his salt knows this. If the Emails were deleted, even by
mistake, a good investigator can still retrieve the data
from the hard drives. This is the silliest attempt at
obstruction in history. This “lost Email” excuse, doesn’t
even pass the laugh test. As Leahy said, “they are there”.
Emails, and other computer data never gets lost. And if
April 12th, 2007 at 5:41 pmthe data has been lost because the drives were wiped
clean, that takes a good savvy Tech. Whomever thought
up this excuse needs sent packing. Because they have
only made thing worse.
[…] “I Didn’t Lie, I Just Had No Idea What I Was Talking About!” • • • […]
April 12th, 2007 at 6:21 pmThis administration uses the excuse “I didn’t know” To justify ONE ABUSE OF POWER AFTER ANOTHER. Iraq Intel, Outing covert agents, Wire taps, Katrina, Oil profits, War profiteering, Global warming, Screwing up a war, Politically targeting attorney’s, Abusing the the power of the Oval Office, The hatch act, etc, etc, etc….
Ignorance is not an excuse. It is derilect. It is incompetence. It is negligence.
They know excactly what they have done and will continue to do until we grow the balls to stop them.
Committing crimes against the American people and the constitution they are supposed to be defending.
IMPEACH THE WHOLE ADMINISTRATION TOP TO BOTTOM
April 12th, 2007 at 6:53 pmYou have to admitt 22 is a handfull…. Yeah, of M&M’s.
Well, were’nt there more than that?
UHH… Well… yeah, before it was like fifty something akay, but now it’s l-i-k-e only twentytwo. Cuz fifty would be like alot, so now it’s like twentytwo which is lotz less than fifty akay. So like cuz its not like, that many who did it akay, that means its not like… illegal er anything.
Do i like, have to explain everything to you people cuz, I’m like totally Lying akay… Totally! But because i work for like this administration Lying is like legal akay. I mean where-have-you-been?
April 12th, 2007 at 7:10 pmI agree that it seems that Bush’s White House is always prepared to give statements, but usually doesn’t know what it is talking about.
While Tony Snow was slick and slippery and seemed to know what his masters were really doing, Dana Perino seems like she is in way over her head. She probably doesn’t get briefed to the extent that Tony Snow was briefed.
It almost makes me feel sorry for her. I said *almost*.
April 12th, 2007 at 7:14 pmPerino is clearly of the school “fake it till you make it” and she’s failed abysmally. Her career is now in the toilet totally. She hasn’t a shard of credibility and is moronic to boot. “We definitely screwed up”….since when was that sophisticated language: “screwed up”?? She’s a polished up turd with a third-rate education who doesn’t have enough finesse to find her way out of a paper bag and THIS is the person who representes this White House?????? Where the hell did they dig her up?? Guess it’s just like the War Czar problem: everyone else had enough smarts not to take the job.
Dana’s a true ditz in every respect and gains absolutely no respect for this white house at all.
April 12th, 2007 at 7:16 pmDana Perina = another bushie a$$clown!
April 12th, 2007 at 7:17 pmHey Dale/troll….the reason why we are finding “conspiracies under every rock” because that’s precisely where they are - under each and every rock and in every nook and crannie of this administration. Guess it’s the first time I wholeheartedly agree with a troll. Yikes!
April 12th, 2007 at 7:18 pmYeah! Like Hitler was just like… one guy, right? So all that stuff wasn’t that bad right?
How many people does it take to commit a crime?
one or a hanfull? or maybe fifty something…
Would you believe 73 chief? No… how-about 75?….. on a sunday?
It was just a handfull… How pathetic!
BTW… isn’t that how watergate started.
Yeah, but that was Hotel. Can’t you see the difference?
GetSmart rabiddummy
April 12th, 2007 at 7:29 pm[…] Transcript: (more…) […]
April 12th, 2007 at 8:01 pmYou know, Dana would sound a lot better with my dick in her mouth.
April 12th, 2007 at 8:05 pm“We have developed a better understanding of how the RNC archived or did not archive certain e-mails.†(emphasis mine)
RNC archiving policy: delete damaging e-mails, archive “safe” ones.
April 12th, 2007 at 8:51 pm[…] Perino ‘Defends’ Email Statements: I Didn’t Lie, I Just Had No Idea What I Was Tal… […]
April 12th, 2007 at 8:59 pmHow many doctors do you know give press conferences and answer questions on the spot and then do surgery then? I have had doctors say I think you have the flu and it turn out to be worse. Was he lying? Of course not he was working with the information he had. Sorry bad anology on your part.
Comment by rabidbunny
Bad analogy? Hardly, you just admitted you had an incompetent doctor and had to seek advice from another because they screwed up and diagnosed wrongly causing you to seek out another doctor. But I guess this only means you think incompetence which cost you money is SOMEHOW a good thing?
Did you also go back to the first doctor again? Why not?
April 12th, 2007 at 9:53 pmI have had doctors say I think you have the flu and it turn out to be worse. -Vapid Bunny
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Vapid Funny; Doctor I don’t feel good.
Wassup DOc; Oh you have the flu. BTW you don’t look good either.
Vapid Funny; Are you sure?
Wassup Doc; Absolutely.
Vapid Funny; Doc, I still don’t feel good. I need a second opinion.
Wassup Doc #2; Oh,you have a pneumonia.
Vapid Bunny; Oh dear.
Vapid Bunny; Wassup Doc, [numero uno] why didn’t you tell me I had pneumonia?
Wassup Doc; Heh, I didn’t know, so I guessed.
Vapid Bunny; I could have died!
Wassup Doc; Oh, well to bad, at least you don’t think I’m incompetent or a liar.
April 12th, 2007 at 9:59 pmSEE THE LYING Perino THERE, WITH HER EMPTY AIRHEAD SKULL—Perino: “DUHHHHHHHHH….I WASN’T LYING, I WAS STANDING UP WHEN I SAID WHAT I DID!!!!!” WHAT A TOTAL MAROON!!!!!
April 12th, 2007 at 11:57 pm[…] of State at the same time he was actively replacing The Donald, surely White House spokesperson Dana Perino can get away with claiming it’s just a handful of White House personnel using private e mail […]
April 13th, 2007 at 2:07 amPoor kid, satins’ mouth cought in a lie.
I wonder if she envies Tony Snow now?
April 13th, 2007 at 3:45 amNot to worry about Perino lying to the press; all the WH has to do is have a big party for the press, another kiss-ass black tie affair (like the WH Correspondents’ Dinner), or a symposium/panel on WH/press relations so hacks like Richard Wolffe and company can say how wonderful the WH press operation is (and how horrid bloggers are), and all will be forgiven.
Perino is lying to the press because she knows the WH steno pool doesn’t have the balls to do anything about it.
April 13th, 2007 at 4:24 amThey’re not just ‘establishing relations’; they’re inviting them to speak before Congress. Can you imagine inviting Hitler to speak before Congress?
sayeth the great seer ChipNDull.. uhm i mean DALE.
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/ 20070301faessay86208/ robert-s-leiken-steven-brooke/ the-moderate-muslim-brotherhood.html
“Jihadists loathe the Muslim Brotherhood (known in Arabic as al-Ikhwan al-Muslimeen) for rejecting global jihad and embracing democracy. These positions seem to make them moderates, the very thing the United States, short on allies in the Muslim world, seeks. ”
The Muslim (not moslem you inbred twit) Brotherhood is a currently a force for moderation in the Arab world. Now I know idiots like you don’t understand concepts like “moderation”, but as much as you and your twisted religious psychopatic rapture-desiring buddies may like to think we can, we can’t just “turn the middle east into a parking lot”. We need moderate forces there. The MB is one of them. In your black and white world, its just “Us” and “them”. The rest of us see shades of grey. Your macho flaghumping nationistic xenophobic crap and hyperbolicly innane analogies aren’t meant for thinking people.
Oh and Dale… you know the Iraq government was formed with the help of Al-Sadr, right? You know Al-Sadr’s supporters have killed American troops in the past, right? So, we talk to the Iraqi government….. so we are talking to people who are KILLING OUR TROOPS! Oh my gosh.. dale, should we cut off all contacts with the IRaqi government if we discover that people in thier government are in organizations that have killed our troops? please please say yes…. and we also shouldnt give money to peopel in organizations or governments that have killed our troops in the past, right?
April 13th, 2007 at 6:21 amHow long will most of America pretend & utilize the position that this Administration made another mistake, as if they are just learning how to govern?
April 13th, 2007 at 12:39 pmSince Bush’s first inauguration, this group has worked exactly the way it planned, steamrolling through our lives, liberties & economy. Nothing has ever been a mistake, energy, health, education, employment, war, etc. & the money to be made by war have been set & met in their governance. Both political parties have made it a reality, and continue to play their role as directed by not the “Bush” team but the real powers that finance & control them. There is a Global power elite, and the Saudis are a major part of it, but all our elected officials are, did, & do nothing to take our country back. Bush the man is a traitor, a coward & evil from day one. Look back at the things he has done & said, the people he placed in power, and the manner in which he undermines our liberties, our belief in government. That has always been blatant.
It is not beyond me that this cabal did not have a hand in 9/11, remember the look he had when they told him about it, and the way he acted before it. He is not funny, or dumb, or out of his league.
He started off to destroy our America while making his benefactor richer, taking our liberties & freedoms out of the way.
We the people have failed because we let it happen, over & over, arguing amongst ourselves rather than fighting the power.
When will the new congress do the real deed, impeach them all? Never, because allot of those who went along deserve to be impeached also. My Government has failed us and will not allow it to be fixed.
When or will our frustration turn to actual action? How many more will die, how many more jobs will be outsourced, how much poverty can we accept, how much healthcare can be eliminated, how much violence will we allow in our name, how much profit can be made before we change our ways, change our country to what it was what it should be, what the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, morality demands of us? That is the issue not what’s the new lie or possible blunder coming out of the White House?
It must always come back to “We the people…”
Dana may lie like a rug and very poorly at that, but she smokes a mean pole and takes it up the pooper like a true pro!!
April 13th, 2007 at 3:22 pmSo if she doesn’t know what she’s talking about, why doesn’t she do us all a little good and just give us a good show.
Meet everyone down at the local strip joint? Oh, that’s right, ReichWingNuts don’t like s*x. So she’s completely useless.
ACTUALLY THEY COME IN TWO MODELS
1. Pedophiles
2.Hermaphrodite
It must be the genes,
April 13th, 2007 at 7:11 pmthey actually come in two models
1. pedophile
2. Hermophrodite
and no they are not show room quality, just viewing the Video of Dana changes the above statement to a misnomer, there are three.
an Ad Hominem turned inside out.
April 13th, 2007 at 7:18 pmWhy does she keep saying she was “asked a question based on something she doesn’t know?” What does that mean anyway? We can only ask questions she knows, like her boss, who has to have questions beforehand so he can be coached? So why does she answer questions with lies if the qeustion is based on something she doesn’t know? Doublespeak!
April 25th, 2007 at 8:15 pmDana Perino speaks sooooo fast that at times, it is impossible to understand what she is saying. Sloooooooow down, Dana. You actually sound like the “Chipmonks” of several years back.
April 26th, 2007 at 2:35 pmThank you.
Dana looks pretty good!!!!!!! I’d do her!!!!!!
April 26th, 2007 at 4:47 pmThis is the same lady who said the Bush was pleased with the A.G.’s performance at Congressional Hearings.
Perhaps she is trying to emulate Senior A.G. and get praised for bone numbing stupidity.
I mean, botch the prewar Intel or the first year of the occupation and you get a Presidential Medial of Freedom. Rummy should be getting his soon. Drop the ball in New Orleans and you get a “do-en a heck of a job Brownie” from the President on T.V.
It is 1984 double speak, George W. Bush has a problem with reality.