Judiciary Committee wants Paulose interview.
By on Apr 16th, 2007 at 9:26 pm
Judiciary Committee wants Paulose interview.
“The House Judiciary Committee wants to interview U.S. Attorney for Minnesota Rachel Paulose, a former assistant to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, … and others based on an initial round of interviews and on a review of documents released by the Justice Department.” Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) “said in the letter that the interviews would be voluntary. A spokeswoman for Paulose could not be reached for comment after regular business hours Monday.” Background on Paulose HERE.
UPDATE: Politico has details on all eight officials Conyers wants to interview.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
I bet if it’s voluntary she doesn’t do it.
April 16th, 2007 at 10:12 pmPaulose is only a small part of Rove’s “voter fraud” scam that will be useless since GOP candidates can’t hope to get 10-15% of the vote in the 2008 elections–thanks to Karl Rove. If you thought it was tough being a Republican in 2006–wait until 2008 . . . thanks, Karl!
April 16th, 2007 at 10:17 pmThere are so many, now caught up in this meltdown of the judicial system, I don’t think it matters if some refuse to cooperate initially.
April 16th, 2007 at 10:22 pmThe evidence to come out will snowball of its own accord, and figures like Paulose will get a subpeona the next time around…
This meltdown involves a huge number of people; it makes sense that they are all scurrying around like rats in a maze. This could mean the end of each of their careers and/or prison time.
April 16th, 2007 at 10:38 pmThese few initial “stonewallers” will eventually realize that the ship is going down and, unless they cooperate for some form of immunity, they’re toast.
April 16th, 2007 at 10:39 pmAnd, it’s become increasingly more evident that this administration calculatedly hired very naive, inexperienced personnel so they would be flattered by the appointment; believe the lies about themselves that they are in any way qualified; and, much to their chagrin, ultimately realize that they’ve been “patsied” by a group of elder thugs with my experience at all forms of chicanery. It’s not easy to accept that you’ve been had – particularly when it has to do with your professional career.
April 16th, 2007 at 10:41 pmyea….Conyers is asking for voluntary “interviews,” not even testimony…what happened to the Rep. Conyers who was calling for impeachment hearings a year and a half ago? Why the hell did he back off right after the ‘06 elections?
fine, Conyers. Hold your “interviews.” keep us entertained. Continue to let Bush have a free hand.
Meanwhile 100 American kids get blown to pieces each month because you’re too chicken to confront Bush head on.
April 16th, 2007 at 10:51 pmHave a read please…
Police beat Putin foes at rally
News Article Link
Tragedy at Virginia Tech
This will be used to destroy the 2nd Amendment so that there can be no hope of popular uprisings during the soon to come US Military Dictatorship. Soon our protests will resemble the ones in Russia. Just like the Patriot Act tampering with the 2nd Amendment will prevent citizens from protecting themselves.
Many believe that the Federalies had a role during 9-11 so it is not a reach for them to disarm Americans if and when we wind up under Marshall Law. If you give up your guns there would be no way to stop TPTB from marching everyone they want to labor camps.
Get a grip on the prize here people. I have said it many times here. We are not going to pull out of Iraq and we are going to expand the war. At some point there will be a draft since escalation demands it. Taking guns does not make it safer just like invading Iraq does not stop terrorists from attacking on US soil even if they are working for the Federalies.
April 16th, 2007 at 10:53 pmVeritas:
Read this article:
http://www.law.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/View&c=LawArticle&cid=1176455062969&t=LawArticle
Those “naive, inexperienced personnel” are gaming the system, angling for the highest position they can get before Bush’s term expires.
Considering they’re coming from a tier three or four law school, I’d say they’ve done pretty well at gaming the system. After all, they’ve been given power an authority over much more intelligent and experienced people and have used that to run roughshod over the career civil servants.
All that, from a “Christian” law school.
April 16th, 2007 at 10:56 pmOur whole nation is in shock today.
But this happens every single day in Iraq.
Imagine the shock they are in now.
And we helped.
April 16th, 2007 at 10:59 pmI just heard something. The gun used was a police firearm. The guy escaped from jail.
Odds are this is a Black OP
April 16th, 2007 at 11:08 pmjust heard something. The gun used was a police firearm. The guy escaped from jail.
Odds are this is a Black OP
Comment by Saywho
I google the VA Tech thing as well today. There was an incident in 2006 where a William Morva escaped from jail. Perhaps people are confusing the timeline/incidents??
April 16th, 2007 at 11:12 pmThose “naive, inexperienced personnel†are gaming the system, angling for the highest position they can get before Bush’s term expires -BNF
Actually I think they were used simply because they were inexperienced (plus theres the huge donations from Falwell and Robertson)
April 16th, 2007 at 11:15 pmOdds are this is a Black OP
Comment by Saywho — April 16, 2007 @ 11:08 pm
What does that mean?
April 16th, 2007 at 11:15 pmWhat does that mean?
Comment by Shane
It’s a term used for secret operations.
April 16th, 2007 at 11:36 pmWhat does that mean?
Comment by Shane — April 16, 2007 @ 11:15 pm
LIHOP = Let it happen on purpose.
MIHOP = Made it happen on purpose.
Remember those two acronyms for this.
Many believe that 9-11 was allowed to or made to happen by the government. This allowed the Military to assume leadership in the US. Federal Patriot Act One & Two were some of the first legal implementations of this control. As a result the Bill of Rights has been damaged.
One of the last amendments is the 2nd Amendment and now with this event the citizens will clamor for a gun ban. Some people are in denial. So, tomorrow was to be a hearing of AG Alberto Gonzales but that is postponed. Bush will appear reluctant and in the end will grab all of the guns.
Now a ‘Black Operation’ is a military or police action conducted to influence individuals, citizens, groups, states, countries, etc. Fear is a powerful motivator and the military and police know how to use it. If this was a black op it would fit with a pattern. Bush wants to invade Iraq and Blammo 9-11 happens. Bush needs to get re-elected and Blammo Osama phones home. AG needs a diversion and Blammo 30+ dead shooting spree.
April 16th, 2007 at 11:41 pmCan we just try to find out who the f*cking shooter is, before we start screaming conspiracy theory?
This is exhausting…
April 16th, 2007 at 11:53 pmDemocrats concentrating on Gonzales is a waste of time, because Bush and Cheney are behind the firings, so they must be investigated for it.
April 17th, 2007 at 12:04 amCan we just try to find out who the f*cking shooter is, before we start screaming conspiracy theory?
This is exhausting…
Comment by Zooey
I agree, there is too much reactionary fear and conspiracy theory being tossed about.
April 17th, 2007 at 12:08 amComment by Zooey — April 16, 2007 @ 11:53 pm
Remember 9-11?? After some time many were beating the ‘revenge drum’. The US military was positioned to invade Afghanistan before congress authorized war powers. Now we no longer control our government.
Think about today and what is sure to happen regarding guns. The 2nd Amendment compels us to defend ourselves. Turning in your gun means you have NO PROTECTION. That school banned all guns last year. In the future criminals and cops can run over a disarmed population faster with a bigger body count then if the would be victims were armed.
April 17th, 2007 at 12:09 amComment by Saywho — April 17, 2007 @ 12:09 am
I’d say handguns are already a moot point against the Star Wars weaponry that the military has already developed, FOR USE AGAINST CITIZENS!
April 17th, 2007 at 12:13 amIn the future criminals and cops can run over a disarmed population faster with a bigger body count then if the would be victims were armed.
Comment by Saywho
Your fear may be legitimate, Saywho, but I will not live my life in fear. If I end up needing a gun, I’ll get one the old fashioned way — the same way the criminals do.
April 17th, 2007 at 12:17 amComment by Briseadh na Faire — April 17, 2007 @ 12:13 am
OK well then you gave up w/out a fight. It is better to die fighting for your freedom then exist on your knees bowing to a tyrant. You think a sonic cannon or microwave gun is going to get everyone. So then why is the surge failing in Iraq?
April 17th, 2007 at 12:20 amSo then why is the surge failing in Iraq?
Comment by Saywho
For the same reason you just noted. They would rather die fighting than bow to a tyrant?
April 17th, 2007 at 12:30 amYou can get an unregistered gun at the gun show, you know.
April 17th, 2007 at 12:34 amWhen I say “gun show” I don’t mean some guys flexing their biceps.
It’s down at the local swap meet or some crap like that.
April 17th, 2007 at 12:36 amI’ve been entertaining the idea of a nice big gun. A long rifle perhaps.
April 17th, 2007 at 12:37 amFor the same reason you just noted. They would rather die fighting than bow to a tyrant?
Comment by Zep Tepi
That would be us, wouldn’t it, Zep?
Ain’t it great to be an American? Fight them over there so we don’t have to worry about making a profit over here. Little girls covered with blood, but hell, that might be a fake picture! Our military being blown to bits, but send more so the blown up don’t feel dishonored.
It’s insane….
April 17th, 2007 at 12:38 amComment by Zep Tepi — April 17, 2007 @ 12:30 am
I was getting at the fact that the military is using tech weapons in Iraq but the invasion is failing regardless. Should we be reduced to slavery here at home guns may make the difference provide we have some!
April 17th, 2007 at 12:39 amComment by Saywho — April 17, 2007 @ 12:20 am
There are ways to win, without violence.
April 17th, 2007 at 12:41 amIn the future criminals and cops can run over a disarmed population faster with a bigger body count then if the would be victims were armed. Comment by Saywho
And then what? Criminals would then have no one to rob and the cops no one to shoot? And workplaces close? And then the criminals have nothing to steal or people to shoot? You think criminals could operate the electrical generators, or the fresh water and sewage systems? Criminals can never survive for long for they would destroy themselves.
evil needs good, good does not need evil.
April 17th, 2007 at 12:41 amI was getting at the fact that the military is using tech weapons in Iraq but the invasion is failing regardless.
Of course it is. They kicked the russians out of afghanistan as well.
April 17th, 2007 at 12:44 amThere are ways to win, without violence.
Comment by Briseadh na Faire — April 17, 2007 @ 12:41 am
There is no “winning” as you put it. What would we win? Pacifism’s result is slavery. DEFENSE against armed incursions by thugs, jackboots and all the rest is one of the goals of the 2nd Amendment.
April 17th, 2007 at 12:50 amComment by Saywho — April 17, 2007 @ 12:39 am
You can do more damage with a couple of bottles of clorox and Mr. Clean than you can with a long rifle, if your goal is to kill and maim and cause terror.
Look what a couple of guys did in Oaklahoma with nothing but lawn fertilizer and diesel oil.
There’s a lethal arsenal in everyday household products.
But Ghandi defeated the British Empire through non-violence.
We must all choose our own paths…
April 17th, 2007 at 12:51 amHistory has shown over and over again, that facing a strong enemy through gorilla warfare, can indeed win. I don’t know why that lesson has not sunk in.
April 17th, 2007 at 12:52 amThere is no “winning†as you put it. What would we win? Pacifism’s result is slavery.
Comment by Saywho
Tell that to Mahatma Ghandi and Martin Luther King, Jr.
We would win freedom.
April 17th, 2007 at 12:55 amPacifism’s result is slavery.
What? Our best minds that have led to great technoligcal advances came about thru pacifism. Slavery is regression and can never work to advance society or humanity as a whole. Slavery is a result of ignorant war mongers.
April 17th, 2007 at 12:55 amComment by Zep Tepi — April 17, 2007 @ 12:41 am
You don’t get it. You’re another ZERO armament person. We are entering a strange time now. Since we are running out of cheap energy the population will be reduced. If you desire survival then you will need several weapons.
April 17th, 2007 at 12:56 amDid Ghandi become overtly pissed off at people?
April 17th, 2007 at 12:57 amDid Ghandi become overtly pissed off at people?
Comment by ForTruth
Who knows? But he never backed down, and he never gave up — until they killed him. He did what he could, and that’s a lot more than anyone does these days.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:01 amYou don’t get it. You’re another ZERO armament person. -Saywho
No, you don’t get it. The people whom made our society great were inventors, not gun slingers. If it weren’t for that it would still today be the old west.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:01 amComment by Saywho — April 17, 2007 @ 12:50 am
You’re overreaching a bit on the 2nd Amendment. Most people would like to forget the opening clause:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State…” The purpose of the right to bear arms was to supply the State with a well regulated militia. At the time, the militia was necessary to protect the borders from incursions from without. It was also necessary to put down the occasional rebellion (see Whiskey Rebellion, for example). And the final concern was to protect the State from an overreaching Federal Government. That concern was defeated with the South’s loss in the Civil War. Currently, the Federal Government has statutory authority to assume control over all States’ Militias.
If the 2nd Amendment were absolute, then there could be no Constitutional authority for Federal regulation of firearms. Yet it is illegal to own all kinds of weapons.
There is no peace through violence, except the peace of the graveyard.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:01 amI have already seen the Eastern Seaboard of the United States in flames. You desire survival because you fear death. And because you fear death, you are already dead.
There are other ways. And if man-unkind does not learn that lesson, man-unkind will become extinct.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:05 amou don’t get it. You’re another ZERO armament person. We are entering a strange time now. Since we are running out of cheap energy the population will be reduced. If you desire survival then you will need several weapons.
Comment by Saywho
I do get “it” the problem is you didn’t get “it” thousands of years ago.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:08 amI must admit this is my first round of congressional hearings as a somwhat interested and informed person. I do wish I was into this stuff back in the Clinton days. I do blame him for it. At least I get to see Gopers getting investigated and stuff.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:08 amComment by Zooey — April 17, 2007 @ 12:55 am
So you will die or loose loved ones if you cannot harness your killer instinct.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:09 amGeez, fine, Zooey. Ok I’ll do something.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:10 amYou know what? It does not matter if you believe in Christ or not. Greed, hate, materialism and usury would be the downfall of mankind.
Whom here can deny that?
April 17th, 2007 at 1:11 amSo you will die or loose loved ones if you cannot harness your killer instinct.
Comment by Saywho
Humans do not have instinct, only culture. There are worse things than death.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:13 amZep, Saywho isn’t listening. His ears and his heart is closed to all except fear and violence.
Thanks for the leads a couple of days ago. Interesting reading.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:13 amSo you will die or loose loved ones if you cannot harness your killer instinct.
Comment by Saywho
The killer instinct is not what made man. If man had a killer instinct he would have destroyed himself long ago. Yet he didn’t.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:14 amComment by Zooey — April 17, 2007 @ 1:13 am
I beg to differ with you. Babies are born knowing how to suck.
Some people never grow out of that, and they continue to suck as adults.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:15 amComment by Zep Tepi — April 17, 2007 @ 1:14 am
What made man, was the realization that he could die. Thus the fall from paradise.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:18 am(Paraphrasing from “Up From Eden”)
Comment by Briseadh na Faire — April 17, 2007 @ 1:01 am
NO!
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed
Who are “THE PEOPLE”?
We are going to see Marshall Law SOON
April 17th, 2007 at 1:19 amTime for this one to call it a night…jury duty tomorrow…fun.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:19 amI beg to differ with you. Babies are born knowing how to suck.
Some people never grow out of that, and they continue to suck as adults.
Comment by Briseadh na Faire
Adult sucking is different than baby sucking. That inate survival skill is lost after infancy.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:19 amThat was funny Briseadh na Faire.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:20 amWe are going to see Marshall Law SOON
Comment by Saywho
No offense, but it’s martial law.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:21 amComment by Zooey — April 17, 2007 @ 1:13 am
LOL Humans are just animals. You are not of some higher order LOL
April 17th, 2007 at 1:21 amComment by Saywho — April 17, 2007 @ 1:19 am
like I said, you’re ignoring the introductory clause.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:22 amThanks for the leads a couple of days ago. Interesting reading.
Comment by Briseadh na Faire
Your welcome BNF. It all relates. All religions and all beliefs Thoht of old and thought today. =)
April 17th, 2007 at 1:23 amAdult sucking is different than baby sucking.
Comment by Zooey — April 17, 2007 @ 1:19 am
I wasn’t talking about adult sucking, but that some adults suck!
April 17th, 2007 at 1:24 amAnd as I recall BNF Odin was as well thought. =)
April 17th, 2007 at 1:24 amLOL Humans are just animals. You are not of some higher order LOL
Comment by Saywho
I don’t claim to be of some higher order.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:24 amYou can look it up later — after you stop sucking.
No offense, but it’s martial law.
Comment by Zooey — April 17, 2007 @ 1:21 am
give him the benefit of the doubt. maybe he was talking about:
http://www.marshalllaw.co.uk/
April 17th, 2007 at 1:25 amI wasn’t talking about adult sucking, but that some adults suck!
Comment by Briseadh na Faire
I know that! What did you think I was talking about? Duh! :P
April 17th, 2007 at 1:26 amYou are not of some higher order LOL
Comment by Saywho — April 17, 2007 @ 1:21 am
How can you be so sure? If you’re stating fact, cite the fact. If it’s part of your belief system, you gives you the right to impose your beliefs upon others?
April 17th, 2007 at 1:28 amLOL Humans are just animals. You are not of some higher order LOL
Comment by Saywho
Then we should be swinging from trees. Yet we aren’t
We, physically, are not of some higher order but our thoughts are. How so did man become much more intelligent than his earthly peers?
April 17th, 2007 at 1:29 amWhat did you think I was talking about? Duh! :P
Comment by Zooey — April 17, 2007 @ 1:26 am
ummmm…never mind…
8-x
good night all!
April 17th, 2007 at 1:29 amAnd then some of us regain the survival skill’s with age and experience…..That from the old pacafists that own’s guns for protection along with all the food, water, and fuel I can keep….It is not the fear of death that make’s many of us keep our arm’s but merely self protetion and defence in case we are under attack from a predator like our own government for instance…..I own mine to protect my self and all my supplies….Blessings all…Work for Peace but be prepared for the war……Thinking of RUCerious and all in need of healing.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:30 am#65 – Briseadh na Faire
Oh behave…
April 17th, 2007 at 1:30 amwe are already extinct, we just don’t know it yet.
Now if it were only Jake the Fake that was extinct.
Hating Rethugs Daily
April 17th, 2007 at 1:30 amLOL Humans are just animals. You are not of some higher order LOL
Comment by Saywho
Have you seen a chimpanzee write a book?
April 17th, 2007 at 1:32 amFacts, look up the loss of Bees around the world, bees gone, we gone in 4 years, good luck.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:33 amHello, Sharon. Goodnight Sharon, Zep, Truth, Briseadh na Faire.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:33 amIf you people think that eliminating the 2nd Amendment will lead us to peace you have completely missed the flight. Smart men, women and families will survive what is going to happen by banding together and defending their group. Guns are only a fraction of the weapons needed. You will need clubs, spears, bow n arrow, knives, guns and explosives. You will also have to know how to start a fire and find clean water. You need to learn how to defend yourself with weapons and bare hands.
Do the math and harness your killer instinct.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:37 amBack at ya Lady Z, and me to…Blessings
April 17th, 2007 at 1:37 amGN to those that said GN.
I have a question saywho. If humans are of a higher order than animals, why do not animals have guns and shoot one another?
April 17th, 2007 at 1:39 amDo the math and harness your killer instinct.
Comment by Saywho
Are you talking of our government or anothers?
April 17th, 2007 at 1:40 amI used to hear this kind of talk decades ago Saywho. People built shelters in secret and stored food. They built underground bunkers. They stored weapons.
Now all that stuff is rusted and moldy.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:46 amHow so did man become much more intelligent than his earthly peers?
Comment by Zep Tepi
Becuz savannah doesnt have trees. At the moment the beings that left the trees in order to hunt, began using their back extremities to see the preys, they began using the hands. The development of the hand is directly related with the development of the brain. Some millions years later, bingo! you have cluster bombs all over civilians. I agree with you. We are animals, but we have the best survival organ ever developed in the history of planet Earth: the brain.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:52 amThe right to bear arms is intended for people who doesnt know how to end conflicts in a civilized manner.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:55 amWe are animals, but we have the best survival organ ever developed in the history of planet Earth: the brain.
Comment by Juan C
We are but of matter. The real question then is when did higher thought begin? Brains do not survive as bone has thru the millions of years.
Thought, I think, began before the dinosaurs. From the first light, the bang, that dust, that traversed a black hole. Yes, Indeed, thought comes from cosmic dust. The earth accreates solar dust and in that dust comes thought.
Aye, for this is true. Doubt me not.
April 17th, 2007 at 2:09 amComment by Zooey — April 17, 2007 @ 1:21 am
I don’t know how that happened and I stand corrected on a spelling error Martial is what it should read.
I doubt a spelling error will make your choice to disarm any less foolish. You still don’t understand that things in whatever country you are in are going to get worse and worse. I can’t stand Bush and he might be the Antichrist but getting rid of him will change nothing at this point. Odds are we are facing extinction and I’m sure the Military knows that already. A good scout always prepares for the worst and hopes for the best.
I don’t fear death and that is a pretty silly comment since you know nothing about me. In my life I have been dead twice. Once in a car wreck and the first time at birth though I don’t remember that one. I was shot one time passing through my bicep when asking directions in a bad area. I was stabbed while attempting to break up a fight. So that is some of the stuff on my journey.
I hunt, fish, trap and plant in an effort to eat the foods I like and remain in practice should our supermarkets fail us. None of you (maybe some) are prepared for starvation or cleaning dirty water without fire. Survival skills are not part of an industrialized world. The same goes for your killing skills. The cops and army will not show up till your dead unless they decide they want to sport kill you.
30+ people in several hours died today all reported to be victims of ONE man who in the end shot himself. For hours he killed and the police can be seen behind the doors of the police cars. Since they are the GUNNERS that get the bucks when were they going to ram the building with the tank they had there? BATF agents had no problem burning the Branch Davidians and this was just ONE man.
Imagine if just one of those inside had a gun? He or she could have made a difference that the police didn’t in spite of their training, armaments and sheer numbers. Put yourself in that building while you are watching the murders. Then the killer puts his gun to your head and whatever crap you say here is irrelevant. You wish it was at least fair, but then so do most victims. If you had a gun you might have been able to kill him before it became your turn for execution.
April 17th, 2007 at 2:17 amComment by Zep Tepi — April 17, 2007 @ 2:09 am
Sorry but you are a nut job and that makes you a fool as well. Large numbers of people have to compete more for food as resources become more taxed. Once we see shortages of resources things loosen up and at some point everything comes down to…
April 17th, 2007 at 2:28 amKill or be killed!
Where I served in Korea is none of anybody’s business frankly. And despite what some people here are claiming, I am not a sexual offender who lives in my mother’s garage.
April 17th, 2007 at 2:38 amWhere I served in Korea is none of anybody’s business frankly. And despite what some people here are claiming, I am not a sexual offender who lives in my mother’s garage.
Comment by Jake
When you served in Korea is more to the point. We know it wasn’t when there was a “shooting war” going on. I’m sorry to hear that your mother is a sexual offender that lives in a garage.
April 17th, 2007 at 3:13 amSaywho, you sound a tad….paranoid.
Bushco isn’t about to recind the 2nd Amendment anytime soon – there would be too many people up in arms (ahem).
In fact, wasn’t there a call on TV saying just that…no-one will take your precious guns away.
I don’t recall anyone one here calling for it as a knee-jek reaction to the VA Tech tragedy either.
Calm down, and go check on your years supply of beans.
April 17th, 2007 at 4:36 amBTW, did you know Tim, or do you just look up to him?
#86 Is lying I’m the real Jake and I don’t live in my mother’s garage. My mother is dead you prick…
April 17th, 2007 at 4:55 amI’d say handguns are already a moot point against the Star Wars weaponry that the military has already developed, FOR USE AGAINST CITIZENS!
Comment by Briseadh na Faire
All you need are some IED’s and a couple of old russian rifles and the streets of the US will turn into the streets of Iraq.
The biggest baddest army in the world defeated by a few thousand fighters. Unbeleivable.
Sooner or later they are going to have to come into some cities that are already war zones. See Philadelphia.
Looking at whats going on in Iraq they wont have a chance.
April 17th, 2007 at 5:10 amI’m curious about why you guys would imply that Politico is a credible site to link to.
You guys enjoy a position at the top tier of political blogs; yet you link to incredulous sites like politico, who have time and again guised ‘credibility’ with hackery.
Please stop lending sites like politico the aura of credibility. They have little if none and should be required to earn it rather than enjoy the perpetuation it’s guise as a result of outside linking.
::::::::
April 17th, 2007 at 7:15 amdude, philly is fine. yes, it does have a relatively high murder rate, but relative to san francisco or topeka, not baghdad. i don’t need to walk around followed by Apaches, Blackhawks and cadre of soldiers.
April 17th, 2007 at 10:01 amSooner or later they are going to have to come into some cities that are already war zones. See Philadelphia.
Dude Philly isn’t the problem. It’s those Indiana farm markets that need martial law. Think I’m kidding ask rep pence.
April 17th, 2007 at 10:54 amI’m curious about why you guys would imply that Politico is a credible site to link to. Comment by Andrew
I gotta agree on this point… After as many times as Politico has been found to be wrong, are we really going to believe it as a fact without other sources?
April 17th, 2007 at 11:50 amSaywho thinks I’m a nutjob for saying what the sumerians did!
Where are you getting all this conspiracy theory stuff Saywho?
Have you been reading over at stormfront.org?
Really the earth DOES accreate solar dust at a phenomenal rate. Even today it falls to earth. That solar dust is where thought and life began. Call it nutty all you want but it’s a fact.
April 17th, 2007 at 1:01 pmcan you say Black OP….”HEY LOOK OVER THERE!” …. please peeps
dont you know this administration will stop and NOTHING to distract americans’ attention from their legion of crimes?
they killed 3300 of us 9/11
32 students is a drop in the bucket to these people
the assailant had a police gun and had “escaped” from jail
getaclue
April 17th, 2007 at 1:09 pmhttp://www.johnconyers.com/node/88#commen
TeamConyersBlog
TeamConyersBlog welcomes new visitors to ConyersBlog. Click the link for information about
TeamConyersBlog (TCB) and ConyersBlog.
We have a general membership meeting every Saturday at noon Central Time and all ConyersBloggers are welcome to attend. To join, click the link and login. Then follow path:
Members (top left) > Soapbox > Chat > Enter
The chatroom is open 24/7 and you are welcome to stop in any time.
——–
This is what Bush created in Iraq. Read it here: http://www.michaelmoore.com/ words/ latestnews/ index.php?id=8494.
This is sad and sick.
April 18th, 2007 at 4:11 ambusiness introductory letter
) Some individuals or companies have abused the TrackBack feature to insert spam links on some blogs (see sping).. Six Apart started
March 18th, 2008 at 9:37 pm