If you want the best combination of flexibility, convenience, and reliability in your high speed Internet service, then HughesNet is your Internet service provider of choice. While any company can promise high speeds and great quality service, HughesNe…

BTW if you thing I am done with you in this thread, I am just warming up.

“Eric Alterman on the other hand use to have a blog….”

“Of course, in your book I made up the story about your attempts to post on Alterman”

Please stop assuming so much. Do you know how long ago that was that I use to post on Alterman’s blog? BTW he doesn’t have the blog anymore, therefore my statement about only posting here is accurate. What is your point?

“One of these days I may remember specifically on which posts dating back to last year when you started calling me “little girl,” too.”

Good luck! LOL!…and when you do find that post in which I called you a “little girl” BEFORE you refered to me a “boy”, which I posted already, you let me know and I will apologize.

“I have proven to my satisfaction that you are the one with the faulty memory…”

Well considering I posted proof that you also have a faulty memory then I guess we both are human. I don’t have a problem with it.

“I have avoided mentioning that I am well known among my circle of friends, acquaintances, former classmates, etc. for my very good (some say “frighteningly good”) memory…”

Same here especially when if comes to arguments with my wife and my co-workers. Good for you…but it isn’t perfect and neither is mine.

“But more proof of it is that I can spell and you can’t.”

Well I am better at math and geometry any day of the week. Not to mention being far more intelligent when it comes to engineering and physics. Why do you need to insult me again when there are dozens of things that I can do better than you?

“It is simply an area where I excel.”

Well that’s great, but if you want to compare resumes and what your skills are worth in the real world compared to mine, then I will have lots of fun doing it. It isn’t even close. As a registered architect/engineer what I do for a living does far more for society as a whole than what you do for a living….hands down.

“I was not the one who started this “little girl/little boy” thing. You were and stop whining about it, little boy.”

Whatever little girl! You go find that post before this thread, but untill then your recollection isn’t worth anything….

http://thinkprogress.org/ 2007/ 03/ 18/ mtp-iraq-debate/ #comments

“Yes, Tracy, of course, you are always right about everything”

I never said that or think that.

“you know better than Waxman about law”

I know for a fact the there was nothing illegal about the firings.

“you know what are high standards (even though you think it’s okay to spend $75 million to build a useless police academy in Iraq that leaks human excrement”

When did I say it was a good investment about that project? Never. Keep making things up and inferring that I am OK with them. I am use to it now.

“I suppose you think the Iraqis will see that as a wonderful sign of American friendship and good intentions”

You suppose a lot of things. I guess it’s just your “style”.

“…but don’t find anything hypocritical about the lack of Bush/Cheney family members in the military”

Nor do I for the majority members of Congress in both the Democratic and Republican parties, or for good ‘ol BJ Clinton. I think that military service is irrelevant when it comes to discussing the war in Iraq.

“BTW, calling me names like “bitch” is against TP’s Terms of Use. Try it again, and I will file a complaint about you.”

I will do it again if you tell me to fuck off again. No problem any time it warrants. Go ahead and do it now, if you have the courage. That’s of course if you think your lame “Cheney off” phrase is OK with TP and that’s also of course if TP isn’t so PC that it doesn’t have the guts to see right thru your crap.

“Eric Alterman on the other hand use to have a blog (LOL! if you wanted to call it one) on MSNBC and I had posted dozens of comments but they obviously went thru a screener first and only the ones the HE wanted to be posted were, i.e. 99.9% of them were those either praising him or they were in line with his left wing politics.”

“Also, several posters here have mentioned being banned from certain other neo-con sites. I tend to believe them; but if you can prove this wrong, I will certainly accept it.”

LOL! I think if you were truely(SIC) objective that you would demand that the prove their claim about being banned on conservative sites is right! BTW this hypocritical blog has a “terms of use” page that says…
Comment by Tracy December 1, 2006 6:45

Of course, in your book I made up the story about your attempts to post on Alterman, and your memory is sooooo much better than mine (even though you couldn’t remember the original “bitch” statement nor the one above). One of these days I may remember specifically on which posts dating back to last year when you started calling me “little girl,” too.

Remember in both cases, one where Clinton fired all of his USAs, except one, at the beginning of his first term and the other where Bush fire eight in the middle of his second term, the motive in BOTH cases was pure politics. BTW there was absolutely nothing criminal about the firing of the eight by Bush which is exactly what Waxman is trying to do, i.e. criminalize Bush’s actions.

“I have only reminded you of what you call a bad precedent, because you keep on bringing up what “Clinton did.”

Why do you say what I am calling a bad precedent? Your statement is basically saying that firing them in the beginning of a term is OK but during the middle of a term it’s not. That’s crap.

“You still don’t get it that firings the USAs at the beginning of an administration and midterm are different things.”

No they aren’t. They are both wrong! The timing is irrelevant. In both cases, in both administrations, they were done for PURE political purposes. You just don’t seem to get it, which is absolutely unbelievable.

“You admitted your mistake only after I dug something up to prove it.”

I dug up the proof, yet you STILL deny it!

“Oh, am I really lacking the courage to admit my mistakes, eh?”

I didn’t even post a link to another thead and you admitted that you were wrong, but in this case I post a link to the exact thread where you called me a “boy”, which was right before I started referring to you as “little girl”, and you still deny it by offering a lame defense that it isn’t your “style”.

“But my overall impression is of your various defenses of him.”

Well that’s because you haven’t read every thing I have posted here….by far.

“Are you here to attack repeatedly a woman you’ve never met or make a political statement”

And here you repeatedly attack a man you have never met and expect me to be honored by you telling me to fuck off. That’s pathetic!

Tracy: Yes I didn’t remember and in this case, maybe, just maybe you just don’t remember what you posted when. YouSIC) infallibility complex is just amazing and at least I have the courage to admit my mistakes.

You admitted your mistake only after I dug something up to prove it. I know that I don’t use “little boy” even to real little boys, plain and simple. Oh, am I really lacking the courage to admit my mistakes, eh? This from less than a month ago:
#115
Sorry: now I do recall a bit of criticism from you of Bush. But my overall impression is of your various defenses of him.
Comment by Lora — March 29, 2007

Can’t even spell “compliment,” can you, Tracy?
Are you here to attack repeatedly a woman you’ve never met or make a political statement–something you’ve grossly failed at, with your lame defenses of a ultra-corrupt administration? How pathetic!

“I know myself well enough to know that I would never start calling someone “little boy” unless in retaliation for being called “little girl.” Plain and simple, period. You didn’t recall calling me “bitch” either, did you?”

Yes I didn’t remember and in this case, maybe, just maybe you just don’t remember what you posted when. You infallibility complex is just amazing and at least I have the courage to admit my mistakes.

“I wouldn’t dig up something like that right out of nowhere.”

Neither would I, so either you memory is faulty or mine is.

Again, you don’t think it’s a BAD precedent for an incoming administration to fire the vast majority of the the USAs? I see you don’t have the courage to answer this question.

“As far as I’m concerned, you can go Cheney-off, and you have the honor of being the only person I’ve ever said this to twice.”

Coming from a bitch like you, I take that as a complement.

Ps. You complained on one thread–don’t recall which one now–about trying to post on Alterman but being deleted or something like that. I wouldn’t dig up something like that right out of nowhere. That’s all I have to say to you.

“Sorry, little boy, but I, too, have better things to do in my life than look up something that I know is wrong”

Which means you are full of crap and have zero proof otherwise that can prove your assertions about what happened when.

“You started calling me “little girl” in some posts long before the one you just dug up…”

Well since you can seem to remember and the fact that you can’t recall when I did….your word isn’t worth much. The reason I brought up that particular thread is because it WAS the time YOU called me “boy”. From then on you were “little girl” in my book.

“I think any woman with a bit of self-respect would regard being called “little girl” as sexist regardless of what the dictionary may say.”

What does sexist mean to you other than what the definition says? I asked my wife, who has at least as much self respect as you do, what she would think if someone got into an argument with another person and they called her “a little girl”, she came up with the word “condesending”, which I believe you mentioned a while back. Should have stuck with it.

“I remember specifically that I didn’t address you as “man” at the time because it sounds too much like Harlem street slang to me.”

Or, you were just being a jerk.

“Unlike you, we don’t have to look up the word; we experience it frequently in life.”

Well then you are far too sensitive and/or PC, which doesn’t suprise me. You know how to spell, but your knowledge of the meaning of words is lacking or you have your own little personal dictionary.

“I have only reminded you of what you call a bad precedent, because you keep on bringing up what “Clinton did.””

So you don’t think it’s a BAD precedent for an incoming administration to fire the vast majority of the the USAs? Is this some more of your low standards mantra?

“You’re in no position to discuss my life and how I spend it.”

And you are in no postition to incinuate that I was being cowardly by posting days after the last post. Where is your evidence? I have aready posted a long time ago, evidence of you being cowardly by insulting others while standing behind other people’s words.

“Unlike you, I don’t try to post on Alterman or other blogs.”

How do you know where I post? I am just like you, I only post in this blog.

“And I usually don’t post in big spurts like you.”

Oh, whatever!…you hunt around just like the rest of us and post your little comments, but you are right….you rarely DEBATE.

“But that’s not supposed to be the purpose of these posts.”

Well if would answer my question instead of trying to deflect to another congressman then we would have never got off on this tangent…see #194, not to mention your last condesending remark “I just love Rethug family values!” which prompted me to call you “a little girl”. I initially asked…”What does Waxman actually do in Congress beside launch and conduct investigations?” and then you brought up Dan Burton. I asked the question because people here, including yourself, thinks that Waxman doesn’t indulge in pork barrel spending, which he does, as my links factually pointed out. You have yet to refute any of my links.

“You, in fact, are reiterating a bad precedent when you keep on writing “But Clinton fired….””

Oh, but you haven’t?! LOL!

“Also, I am glad to see a Congressman who isn’t indluging in pork like Ted Stevens’”

“Calling an adult woman you don’t agree with “little girl” is sexist in my book”

OK, I see that you don’t mind making up definitions.

“I will not be checking any old posts because I know I never started calling you “little boy” until after you addressed me as “little girl.” It’s simply not my style.”

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/18/mtp-iraq-debate/#comments

Oh yes it’s your style…#584…but I can probably guess that the word “little” makes a big difference in your mind. If you have something earlier of mine please post.

“Since you claim to be in CST, isn’t this getting a bit past your bedtime?”

“Also, I am glad to see a Congressman who isn’t indluging in pork like Ted Stevens’ “bridge to nowhere” in Alaska.”

As if Waxman hasn’t attached pork to any of his legislation? Please.

http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer?pagename=news_porkerofthemonth_May03

Not to mention one of many proposed wasteful investigations one of which was one into the cost of Bush’s carrier landing led by Conyer and Waxman…

“These conclusions were verified after Conyers and Waxman demanded that the General Accounting Office (GAO) launch an investigation into the cost of the trip. The head of GAO David Walker said he would not take up their offer since it would take too long and cost more than the trip itself.”

“Maybe I should call you a coward for your habit of posting on threads four or five days after the last comment and when no one else is paying attention”

Well I sorry I have more important things to do that immediately reply. Remember this blog is a side show in my life…unlike yours. BTW YOU are paying attention. BTW please cite some evidence of your BS claim, i.e. that I post specifically, well after the last post, so that I “get the last word”.

You, in fact, are reiterating a bad precedent when you keep on writing “But Clinton fired….” That’s not the issue here, which is what I’ve been trying to point out to you, apparently to no avail.
I am no longer one of Waxman’s constituents, but after the last do-nothing GOP-controlled Congress, I am glad to see someone launching investigations into true corruption–not the president’s cat and Christmas cards lists like Dan Burton. (Did you ever protest that, Tracy?) Also, I am glad to see a Congressman who isn’t indluging in pork like Ted Stevens’ “bridge to nowhere” in Alaska. Beverly Hills doesn’t need pork.
I will not be checking any old posts because I know I never started calling you “little boy” until after you addressed me as “little girl.” It’s simply not my style. You may be mixing me up with someone else, and I see that you offer no proof of it. Calling an adult woman you don’t agree with “little girl” is sexist in my book
As usual, you start posting on an almost dead thread, as if you have to have the last word. You have called me a coward for using “Cheney off” instead of the f-word. Maybe I should call you a coward for your habit of posting on threads four or five days after the last comment and when no one else is paying attention