Perino Blindly Defends White House’s Political Briefings Without Knowing Any Facts
Perino Blindly Defends White House’s Political Briefings Without Knowing Any Facts
White House officials have admitted that they “conducted 20 private briefings on Republican electoral prospects in the last midterm election for senior officials in at least 15 government agencies covered by federal restrictions on partisan political activity.” Today, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino tried to defend these briefings, stating, “There’s nothing in the law that says you can’t do that. It’s not unethical.”
But the Hatch Act prohibits partisan campaign activities on federal property. CNN’s Ed Henry pointed out that six witnesses remember that at one of the briefings, Lurita Doan, the head of GSA, asked Karl Rove-deputy Scott Jennings, “What then, after getting this briefing, can we do to go help Republican candidates? And he said, Let’s talk off-line about that.”
Perino responded that she didn’t know what Jennings meant, adding, “I haven’t spoke to Scott Jennings about this. I don’t think that I will.” Henry asked Perino how she could “make a blanket statement saying no laws were broken” without knowing any details. Watch it:
Transcript:
QUESTION: Can I follow up on it?
Well, I just want to — why then did, according to apparently six witnesses that have apparently spoken to Congressman Waxman, say that, at the end of one of these briefings, the head of the GSA said to I think it was Scott Jennings, one of Karl Rove’s aides, What then, after getting this briefing, can we do to go help Republican candidates? And he said, Let’s talk off-line about that.
PERINO: I never talked to Scott Jennings about that.
I think that…
QUESTION: Well, why would they suggest that…
PERINO: Well, I’m not going to speculate as to what he would have meant by that or not. I mean, he could have meant that that was an inappropriate comment to make in front of other people.
(CROSSTALK)
PERINO: … off-line, instead of embarrassing her in front of other people.
QUESTION: If you don’t know the answer to that, how do you know that no laws were broken or there was nothing unethical…
PERINO: You can check with counsel’s office, and talking about informational briefings about political landscape, that that is OK, that that is acceptable. There’s nothing in the law that says you can’t do that. It’s not unethical. And it is something that is absolutely reasonable and appropriate, to provide political appointees with information about the landscape in which they’re working.
QUESTION: What if, at the end of those briefings, there were other conversations about, then, how you can help…
PERINO: What if? What if? I’m not answering what ifs.
QUESTION: But you don’t know the answers to those questions, do you? I mean, how can you make a blanket statement that no laws were broken, as you said this morning, when you don’t really know what happened at these briefings or after the briefings?
PERINO: You’re asking me to prove a negative, and I can’t — nobody can do that.
QUESTION: Then how can you make a blanket statement saying no laws were broken? You just made blanket statements without knowing the details…
PERINO: The question is whether or not the political briefings are inappropriate, are unethical or unlawful. And the answer to all three of those questions is no.
QUESTION: Even if, at the end of it, an aide to…
PERINO: But even if, even if. I’m not — you can…
QUESTION: But six people who were there say it. It’s not just…
PERINO: But what I’m saying is that you don’t — I haven’t spoke to Scott Jennings about this. I don’t think that I will. If the Office of the Special Counsel wants to look into this, they are more than welcome to, but I’m not going to get into the middle of someone else’s investigation.
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
88 Responses to “Perino Blindly Defends White House’s Political Briefings Without Knowing Any Facts”
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
She still looks like a drag queen to me.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:15 pmI guess it depends on what your definition of "is" is!!
April 26th, 2007 at 4:17 pmDana Perino is the latest liar for Chimpy.
She also uses "surrender", the latest Repuke talking point lie.
That one is going to backfire on them. Dems should counter that our troops are not surrendering if they leave Iraq and that the Repukes are insulting our troops by saying "surrender'.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:17 pmShe probably doesn't know that she does not know the facts.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:19 pmHow pathetic.
You would think they would have enough respect for one of their own (Orin Hatch R-UT) who came up with the Hatch Act.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:20 pmUnknown unknowns here.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:20 pmread this earlier and kept wondering what law degree she has, or if she had judicial experience because she has already determined nothing illegal had gone on.
She did the job the OSC should do. Probably with the same results unfortunately.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:22 pmShe is looking rough these days. Looks like shilling for bush is worse for the complexion than cigarettes and Mad Dog 20/20.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:24 pmShe's the three monkeys in one (Don't see, Don't hear, Don't Speak). Or thinking better, Bush looks a lot more like the three proverbial monkeys.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:24 pmThese are folks who have invaded another country without the facts to justify their actions.
Everyday run of the mill lying is a piece of cake.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:24 pm"Don't confuse me with the facts. KKKarl has already made up my mind." D. Perino
April 26th, 2007 at 4:24 pmMiss Dana Perino may have what some consider outer blonde beauty, but inside she's another stupid little WH spokes-whore for the Bush crime family (Bcf). I much prefer Jessica Lynch, who is a real beauty and a real person, to boot. That being said, does it really surprise anyone that a member of the Bcf speaks without having any knowledge of the subject at hand?
The Bcf speaks with forked tongue...
April 26th, 2007 at 4:24 pmI love Dana Perino. That is all.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:24 pmSometimes you just have to go a press conference with the press secretary you have, not the one you wish you had.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:25 pmI will not be held accountable for my previous statements.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:25 pmAnd that is my final answer on this subject.
Now, can we move on to something of importance to the American people,
like how Condiment is attempting to avoid being the straw that broke the War Profiteer's back(s).
Funny, but for some reason she looks like a brainwashed, Bushbot, Stepford Republican bimbo.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:26 pm"You would think they would have enough respect for one of their own (Orin Hatch R-UT) who came up with the Hatch Act."
The Hatch Act is not a product of Orrin Hatch:
(wikipedia)
April 26th, 2007 at 4:26 pmThe Hatch Act of 1939 is a United States federal law whose main provision is to prohibit federal employees (civil servants) from engaging in partisan political activity. Named after Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico, the law was officially known as An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities.
I miss Scott McClellan.
He used to get the cutest "deer in the headlights" look when he was lying.
You could look at face and see his brain struggling against the "fight or flight" response when he realized a questioner had his number.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:27 pmIf you really want to insult her tell her she's cute and is entertaining, not that i respond to her in that way.....
April 26th, 2007 at 4:28 pmI hope that Karl likes landscapes, too, because he'll be drawing them from memory while sitting in his jail cell.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:30 pmOne would think you leftards would try spending more time coming up with positive solutions for finalizing our tenure in Iraq, securing our border and stopping the rampant spread of Politically Corrrect BS to bother with this kind of crap.
Are you all so seriously mentally challenged that you don't think partisan shit on both sides happens hourly in federal buildings, everyday?
Hacks. : )
April 26th, 2007 at 4:33 pmDana isn't looking too hot these days, but I agree with #12 that Jessica Lynch is looking better every day.
I want my women smart, honest, and attractive.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:35 pmWe already came up with a positive solution for finalizing our tenure in Iraq.
Chimpy's gonna veto it though.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:35 pmIs Jenn another crossdressing Repuke troll??
Wow, this Giuliani thing is taking off.
All the Repukes are cross-dressing now!!
April 26th, 2007 at 4:36 pmEarth to Dana:
WE DON'T BELIEVE YOU.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:36 pmpost #21 seems somewhat self-referential to me
April 26th, 2007 at 4:37 pm#21...Jenn, that was a pathetic attempt to defend the Bush administration but I think you know that.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:37 pm#7 -- Perhaps this has already been answered -- Perino has a degree in mass communications: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dana_Perino
April 26th, 2007 at 4:39 pmBut facts just get in the way of White House's "truthiness."
April 26th, 2007 at 4:39 pmJenn sounds a lot like I-Right-I to me.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:40 pmOne would think you leftards would try spending more time coming up with positive solutions for finalizing our tenure in Iraq, securing our border and stopping the rampant spread of Politically Corrrect BS to bother with this kind of crap.
Are you all so seriously mentally challenged that you don’t think partisan shit on both sides happens hourly in federal buildings, everyday?
Hacks. : )
Comment by Jenn — April 26, 2007 @ 4:33 pm
Well, when eyewitnesses testify, as they did in this instance, that partisan shit happened in federal buildings on behalf of the Dems, you can crow a little louder. This is not about what supposedly happens every day. This is about what Relublicans allowed to happen, and has been corroborated by Republican witnesses. Even they are sickened by the abuse of power, so it stands to reason you're allowed to be, too.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:40 pmDemocrats do need to come up with some solutions about the border.
That's because Chimpy left the border WIDE OPEN for the last 6 years.
He cut funding for the Coast Guard and Border Patrol. One time he vetoed funding for over 9000 new Border Patrol jobs.
His solution is a guest worker program that is little more than slavery. That program is already being investigated for human rights violations.
Democrats have historically been the party of working Americans. We need to protect our jobs from illegal aliens.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:41 pmOne would think you leftards would try spending more time coming up with positive solutions for finalizing our tenure in Iraq,
Just wait to 2008. You'll see a solution to your finalizing your tenure in Iraq
securing our border
How? Selling the seaport contracts to an arab multinational or letting Haliburton stablish its headquarters in Dubai?
and stopping the rampant spread of Politically Corrrect BS to bother with this kind of crap.
You mean, like the Jackson/Timberlake nipplegate?
Are you all so seriously mentally challenged that you don’t think partisan shit on both sides happens hourly in federal buildings, everyday?
Being the WH a Federal building, how's that an excuse?
Hacks. : )
Comment by Jenn — April 26, 2007 @ 4:33 pm
B!tch ;)
April 26th, 2007 at 4:41 pmPartisan activity is a fact of life in Washington. I know.
The real question is not so much providing a briefing on the political landscape, but whether that briefing was a call to action. If at any point you can show a causal relationship, this has legs. Long legs because the predicate is already in place in the form of the ham-fisted firing of the USAs.
These guys are corrupt and not very good at it.
New on EWM: at last,
April 26th, 2007 at 4:42 pmTwenty Questions with the Muse
Ugh, that bitch is a Colorado native.
Another blight on our fair state.
I hope she stays in DC and never comes back.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:42 pmDoes she just repeat what they say on Fox, or does Fox just repeat what she says? - I can't remember anymore.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:43 pmStupid Repuke troll doesn't understand that it is illegal for Federal employees to have a political slide show on the taxpayer's dime.
Repuke trolls are all inbred morons who are functionally illiterate.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:44 pm"..would try spending more time coming up with positive solutions for finalizing our tenure in Iraq, securing our border and stopping the rampant spread of Politically Corrrect BS..."
Comment by Jenn
We have found the solution and are working on the immediate implementation. It is a simple solution: Impeach Bush and Cheney and clean out the other "cockroaches in the cracks of Congress." Thanks Can-O
April 26th, 2007 at 4:45 pmSo what is Dana's real name...Dan?
April 26th, 2007 at 4:47 pmWhen the repugs know they're in trouble they start trotting out the women to fight their battles.
Lynne Cheney will probably make another appearance soon.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:47 pmWhy should they care if they break the law? The law doesn't apply to them, right?
April 26th, 2007 at 4:47 pmDid anybody really think she was going to tell the truth or have any idea what she was talking about in the first place...?
It's not like this is some new development.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:50 pmSeriously, where did Perino come from? What a fricking idiot. At the end of the video she said she was not going to get into another's investigation. If there is an investigation, what is she doing discussing anything with the press and moreover already passing judgment by declaring that no laws were broken.
OMG. She must be a friend of the Bush family and, if a lawyer, she must have been a classmate of Gonzalez'. Credentials anyone?
April 26th, 2007 at 4:52 pmHacks. : )
Comment by Jenn — April 26, 2007 @ 4:33 pm
One would think, with all the shit your party has pulled, you Republicans wouldn't be around here bitching at us. You'd think you'd try to let your leaders how they have betrayed you since YOU voted for these crooks not us.
But you're here, calling us idiots. Look in the mirror losers. You put these fascist traitors in office. And your pissed at us. YOU destroyed this country so why don't you get the f**k out of here and contact your President.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:53 pmPerrino is such a joke. What an airhead. I am astounded that of the thousands of possible press people and true bushies willing to lie and twist for the junta they are unable to come up with a better actor who can read the (talking points) script with minimal bumbling....I know that the WH press corps is not composed of very astute journalists and few, if any, worthy of the profession, but I assume that the WH has so little respect for the media and the public that they will trot out some halfwit to spout nonsense....I think the spokespeople of banana republics do a more credible job...
April 26th, 2007 at 4:55 pmI saw somewhere that Tony Snow is going back to work sometime next week. Bye, bye you unctious little twit.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:57 pmAw.... you guys are so cute. I just felt like trolling, haven't done it in ages, too busy at my own blog. And like the lemmings you are you respond exactly like the good little leftards you are.
The ad hominem attacks are sweet as well. I didn't know cross dressing was a bad thing, closet homophobes. :)
Your solution is to impeach! Bwah ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!! Thanks for the laugh.
M'Kay, say ya'll get your wet dreams and impeach Bush. Who according to most of your ilk is too stupid to tie his own shoes, so I fail to see why he threatens you so. Any way, he's gone and Cheney too! Yeah for you, Pelosi is President now. WHAT'S THE PLAN THEN? Withdrawl like a bunch of pussies? Pick our asses until the next time? I mean, I wouldn't mind you shit bricks so much if you actually had a plan. 'Cept you don't, you never do. Sad, that's why I left the party of defeatocrats many years ago, and never looked back.
April 26th, 2007 at 4:58 pmI thought I'd never say this but I miss Tony Snow. Now it is true that he lied to us repeatedly as well but he didn't come across as the complete idiot that Perrino is. Is she trying out for Faux News as one of those Girls of Fox who sit there in their mini-skirts as they babble over nothing. Sorry - but she ain't no Laurie Dhue - so forget about it!
April 26th, 2007 at 4:58 pmThis woman is clearly an amateur. Why isn't she using the faulty memory defense? It's all the rage these days.
Dana - it's real simple. Try these lines on for size:
"I don't recall talking to Scott Jennings about that."
"I don't have any recollection of any briefings about Republican candidates."
"I do not recall answering the question you may or may not have asked about blanket statements I may have made a few minutes ago. I honestly don't remember anything about that. Who are you again?"
"To my recollection, there was nothing unethical or unlawful about the meetings that I don't remember having been told about."
"There may or may not be a Hatch Act but I don't recall what it says or whether the briefings that I don't remember having discussed with whatsisface (I don't remember who I may or may not have spoken to about this) are in violation of this alleged law which may or may not exist."
April 26th, 2007 at 5:01 pmDana,
April 26th, 2007 at 5:01 pmIf you have a shred of decency anywhere inside you, then having to say such dishonest and nonsensical things as that must make you feel like you've been swimming in a cesspool when you're done. Seriously, don't you feel like taking a nice hot shower and scrubbing yourself clean with Boraxo and steel wool? Or is the money that good that you don't mind wallowing in filth for a living? Nobody believes what you're saying. You don't believe what you're saying. And nobody believes that you believe what you're saying.
#48 pgl
thought I’d never say this but I miss Tony Snow.
No you don't. He was every bit as bad as her.
April 26th, 2007 at 5:02 pmThe poor dear, looks like the honeymoon is over for her. Dana will be the next to be thrown under the bus.
April 26th, 2007 at 5:03 pmLooks like the stumbling-Bloch OSC investigation is already being used as the smokescreen it was designed to be. Are the Dems going to see through it?
April 26th, 2007 at 5:03 pmPerino has a degree in mass communications
Comment by Helen Rainier
________________________
Making her a weapon of mass communication.
April 26th, 2007 at 5:03 pmShe may cute up there at the podium, but she may be the reason Tony Snowjob will be back at work Monday.
April 26th, 2007 at 5:07 pmnow there is word, this evening, that the
white house spokesperson's lack
of "truthiness" on this score has prompted
our favorite, and famously-productive
oversight-maven, one rep. henry waxman,
to launch a new salvo of nasty-grams to
the heads of various federal agencies!
yes! the above link contains a plain-text
version of the letter to commerce secretary
carlos gutierrez:
". . .To assist with the Committee's continuing
investigation of this issue, I request that you provide
information about any briefing mentioning elections
or candidates provided to agency employees by
officials in the White House between January 20,
2001, and April 26, 2007. Please provide the dates,
times, attendees, and locations of these briefings,
as well as any communications and documents
relating to the briefings. Please provide these
materials to the Committee by May 18, 2007. . ."
busy busy bee, this waxman fella. . .
he he!
buckle up, buttercup rove. . . it is
April 26th, 2007 at 5:08 pmall closin' in on ya', now. . .
Jenn... thanks for not looking back...just keep going...you are demented and should just keep running towards the right...eventually you get to fascist land....(And yes, Bush is a mental and emotional incompetent and if we patriots of the left fear for our country...the one Bush Chaney and the rest of you extremists have been destroying since you stole the 2000 election....bye now, go play with your reichwing friends...we don't need you back here
April 26th, 2007 at 5:09 pm#47 Jenn
Oh golly, Jenn, you've really scorched us good. What blistering, withering attacks. I don't know if I can take it. Love the 'cattiness', though. Ooh, you're so mean.
So, I take it the guidelines for trolls recommend that you claim to be an ex-Democrat? Yeah, that's believable. Well, if that's the case, it looks to me like you jumped onboard a sinking ship. The GOP is swirling 'round the drain. Dumb move.
April 26th, 2007 at 5:10 pmHow does leaving the midst of a civil war amount to surrendering to the enemy?
Who is the enemy? Who does Bush think will "surrender" to us?
That's just another hollow talking point that makes a good sound byte for the repugs and their lemmings.
Richard Clark aptly names Bush's slogan "they'll follow us home" the puppy dog tale.
April 26th, 2007 at 5:11 pmI see that jenn is an angry and frustrated little troll. Say jenn, how about holding your breath for us?
April 26th, 2007 at 5:13 pmI just can't bring myself to hate such a hot piece of a**. She's a dumb blonde and a republican that should be enouugh, leave her alone.
April 26th, 2007 at 5:13 pm....
Q Dana, on the political briefings, if it's the White House's position that those are appropriate, and it was done with public funds in a public agency, will the White House consider releasing the PowerPoint demonstration that was used? And if not, why not?
MS. PERINO: I don't think there's any reason for us to release a PowerPoint presentation. Talking about informational briefings at the White House is -- we don't turn over lots of documents. There's work done at the White House, and that is appropriately done. And I just think -- I just caution everyone to take a step back. These briefings were not inappropriate, they were not unlawful, they were not unethical. There is nothing wrong with what they did.
Dana, we're anxiously waiting for you to come out tomorrow and explain why the totally appropriate and perfectly lawful PowerPoint slides shouldn't be released to the public. They're so innocuous and routine and completely void of any inappropriate campaign strategy, I just can't imagine any reason that you should be afraid to show them to the public. But, I'm sure you've already got a crack team of bullshitters busy crafting your explanation for tomorrow's briefing. This should be good.
April 26th, 2007 at 5:18 pm...I just caution everyone to take a step back...
Have you noticed that Dana has gotten into the habit of using this line whenever she gets stuck on an explanation? She got it from Tony. He alternates that one with the condescending chuckle and "You're getting way out ahead of yourselves here."
April 26th, 2007 at 5:23 pmI honestly don't understand why anyone would expect a White House spokesman/woman to do anything but spout whatever the administration's talking points are. Which further demonstrates the utter uselessness of these "press briefings" to the White House press corp. They then go out on national cable tv and repeat what they've been told. If any of them truly had any self-respect as a journalist, they would walk out of these stupid briefings. How much money do you think these people are costing the papers they represent, which (in my opinion) would be better spent on actual reporters doing real research and investigation? If anyone expects truth from these events, they have their heads up their behinds. And that was just as true during the Clinton administration and many years previously.
April 26th, 2007 at 5:29 pmyea, she's a cutie... but, she doesn't quite have the guys
wrapped around her little finger as much as she thinks she does...
they probably put this fragile looking little flower up there
April 26th, 2007 at 5:31 pmhoping she would be treated kindly... at least with deference...
she's just so cute!
...
Ronald Reagan was an ex-Democrat, too, which raises the question: Are you demented because you're now a Republican or are you now a Republican because you're demented?
April 26th, 2007 at 5:31 pmOf course she doesn't know any facts. The facts she might know, she's not allowed to divulge, and she doesn't have the thorough dishonesty of Fleischer, McLellan, or Snow. She was hired as a "pretty face", with the hope that the press corps would take pity on her.
Cheers,
April 26th, 2007 at 5:34 pmMS. PERINO: I don’t think there’s any reason for us to release a PowerPoint presentation. Talking about informational briefings at the White House is — we don’t turn over lots of documents. There’s work done at the White House, and that is appropriately done. And I just think — I just caution everyone to take a step back. These briefings were not inappropriate, they were not unlawful, they were not unethical. There is nothing wrong with what they did.\
Let's see...these particular briefings in question were NOT done at the White House, nor to WH staff. And whether or not anyone attending those briefings at the other agencies responded like Doan did is also immaterial. The fact is that they were in violation of the Hatch Act. The only reason the Power Point presentation(s) would be withheld is because they are patently political in an arena that, by law, should not have been politicized. Doesn't take a constitutional expert to see that. Nor an attorney. Simple logical conclusion.
April 26th, 2007 at 5:51 pmDana is just an RNC SweetTart.
April 26th, 2007 at 5:53 pmWhat in Hell does the White House think the Hatch act is for? To stop ANY political patronizing of any kind within the civil service system.
If any of the attendees of these sessions are in fact Civil Service Employess then they definately violated the Hatch act and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Ask any past or present Civil Service Employee what kind of trouble they would have found themselves in, if they had attempted to brief fellow employee's in this manner. Fired on the spot!
If past history is any indicator from this administration then in all likelyhood Slimy Gonzales probably put the Hatch act in the same catergory as the Geneva Conventions, just something that is quaint and outdated.
April 26th, 2007 at 5:56 pmKunt.
April 26th, 2007 at 6:30 pmWhere did Dana Perino come from?
April 26th, 2007 at 6:52 pmNovember 2001 - joined DOJ
2002 - appointed Director of Communications for the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to work with Philip A. Cooney (from Cheney's secret energy taskforce, now works with ExxonMobil, edited climate change studies)
later 2002 - Cheney+Council of Environmental Quality+DOJ gave lucrative sole-source contract to Bajagua for a San Diego wastewater treatment plant to be built in Tijuana, Mexico, after replacing the US Attorney on the case.
Seriously, why does the press even attend these briefings? They're a complete joke. I challenge these reporters to get together during a happy hour somewhere and devise a plan to just not show up to a briefing in the future, maybe even skip a handful of them. Then write about how inaccessible this administration is instead.
April 26th, 2007 at 6:53 pmthe tragedy of perino is that just like Monica L. all she is reallly good for is giving head. She is just one more "dumb blonde" who has absolutely no clue. What about not posting anything that she says-- maybe she will just go away!
April 26th, 2007 at 6:54 pmbilljpa
Facts?!? I don't need no stinkin' facts!!
April 26th, 2007 at 7:28 pmUtterly vapid. Comletely clueless. Shallow and without a hint of substance.
Wow. The woman is PERFECTLY SUBLIME as the Bush spokesperson.
April 26th, 2007 at 8:09 pmDon't waste your time listening to what this chick is saying. Just appreciate the fact that she is smoking hot. I only hope that if a Democrat does become President, they will at least bring Dana over. Maybe put her in a leather skirt with some go-go boots...yeah... that's it.
April 26th, 2007 at 8:15 pmI didn't realize that Joan Rivers was nightlighting as a Bush deputy press secretary! Just because you change your hairstyle Joan, doesn't mean people can't still tell who you are!
http://popwatch.ew.com/photos/uncategorized/103716__rivers_l.jpg
April 26th, 2007 at 9:13 pmIs Perino smoking something?
April 26th, 2007 at 9:52 pmSo which regurgitated troll is Jenn. I-R-I is definitely a good guess. It isn't Patrick (more than one sentence without plagiarizing).
April 26th, 2007 at 10:47 pmI'm telling you, people, Perino is a fembot (Austin Powers) she's programed - I just want the press corps to go after her so I can watch her circuits melt and steam come out her ears.
April 26th, 2007 at 10:58 pm#81 Perino is the worst liar since McClellan. She is not good at it. Nobody believes her.
April 26th, 2007 at 11:00 pmGreat Scott!!!!
This one is as brainless as Snow was.
Please scoop the straw off the floor and shove it back into her head from whence it came.
April 26th, 2007 at 11:16 pmI just felt like trolling, haven’t done it in ages, too busy at my own blog.
Wow, you have a blog? Impressive.
Comment by Jenn — April 26, 2007 @ 4:58 pm
April 27th, 2007 at 4:25 amJenn this war was your idea. If you sh1t in your pants why should we have to clean it up? Its a mess.. no mater what happens it will be a mess. Tell me Jenn, do you think there is anything magical america can't accomplish? Your assasine statement is like saying "well, if YOU have a better idea about how to travel in time than spinning in a circle real fast, id love to hear it.."
April 27th, 2007 at 5:18 amI want the press top ask her one question: Do you honestly believe this shit that is coming out of your mouth?
April 27th, 2007 at 9:59 amJenn BWHA HA HA HAHA AHA AHAA AHAHA BWHA HA Jenn BWA HA AHAA AHA AHAHAHHAHA
What's your plan exactly? You are sad indeed.
How does spreadding our Armed Forces throughout the Middle East protect the "Homeland" again?
...crickets...
BWHA HAHAHA AHAHAHAA AHA AHAHHA you, my dear, have got absolutely NOTHING. and that is the funny part.
April 27th, 2007 at 1:00 pmSay, does Dana Perino's briefings remind you all of the Iraqi "Foreign Minister"'s daily on-air briefings of victory and success while his government's army was being pounded to the ground?
April 27th, 2007 at 2:15 pm