White House Excuses Partisan Briefings With False ‘Clinton Did It Too’ Defense
White House Excuses Partisan Briefings With False ‘Clinton Did It Too’ Defense
During yesterday’s press briefing, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino resisted answering any questions about why the administration thought it necessary to give political briefings to appointees at federal agencies, and whose idea it was to hold them.
When one reporter asked Perino whether the briefings were a “White House idea, initially, or was it the agencies,” Perino dodged the question and replied that “the Clinton administration had similar briefings.” Watch it:
Perino’s “Clinton did it too” is wrong. Bush White House officials went to federal agencies on at least 20 occasions and conducted private briefings for large groups of political appointees. They gave presentations focusing on “Republican electoral prospects in the last midterm election.” The Hatch Act explicitly prohibits the use of federal property for partisan political purposes.
Doug Sosnik, who served as President Clinton’s Director of Political Affairs and later as Counselor to the President, told ThinkProgress, “We never went to agencies and briefed political appointees.” Sosnik and several other former Clinton administration officials told ThinkProgress that Clinton officials never conducted similar briefings.
Transcript:
Q Okay, on the political briefings, there seems — there’s no shortage of political information out there. Why does the White House feel it’s necessary to give these employees these briefings in the first place?
MS. PERINO: I think that’s kind of ridiculous question. I mean, there’s — sorry, I usually don’t say those things, but I do think that that one was. Look, there is nothing wrong with political appointees providing other political appointees with an informational briefing about the political landscape in which they are working.
Q I understand. That’s not an answer, as ridiculous as the question was.
MS. PERINO: What, you think that we should just look at the CBS/New York Times poll and make our decisions based on that?
Q It’s 20 briefings –
MS. PERINO: Jim would agree.
Q Well, I’m trying to get to the motivation for this, and it’s 20 briefings –
MS. PERINO: The motivation is to provide people information.
Q But why? Why do they need this information –
MS. PERINO: Why are you asking me these questions? You’re asking information, as well.
Q No, no, but –
MS. PERINO: My point was that you’re asking –
Q Was there any intent to try to tell people that they need to do something about the election, and to take some action?
MS. PERINO: These are information — they’re informational briefings about the political landscape.
Q Okay, so there was — there was no intent to do that? Who — did they ask for the briefings, or was it the White House that decided they wanted to give these briefings?
MS. PERINO: I think it sort of goes both ways. I do know that political appointees around the government — I used to work at an agency, and you are interested in — the reason that you’re here working for the President is that you want to support his policies and his agenda, and so it’s good to get information from time to time.
Q Well, who’s idea — it was the White House idea, initially, or was it the agencies?
MS. PERINO: I think that these briefings — well, I know the Clinton administration had similar briefings. Where did they originate? I don’t know. I couldn’t give you a date.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
I guess Chi-Coms don’t count as partisans.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:02 pmClinton did it too! I knew they were going to say that.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:02 pmWas Marc Rich a partisan?
April 27th, 2007 at 3:02 pmHow about those Puerto Rican terrorists?
Constant lies from the disinformation queen. The issue comes up again and again of collusion in this administration, and this collusion meets all the requirements of the RICO act.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:04 pm“the Clinton administration had similar briefings”
Prove it airhead. Just because you say it doesn’t make it true. Most of what comes out of your vapid mouth is a lie. How do you sleep at night Ms. Perino?
April 27th, 2007 at 3:05 pmIt had been awhile since they used that as their official line. That’s a great old nugget.
If Clinton did it too, then he should have gotten in trouble for it too. If Clinton had murdered his mother, would the President then murder his mother and say it was ok because Clinton did it first?
April 27th, 2007 at 3:05 pmPatrick1:
You are proof perfect that people who support the Bush Crime Family have no ability for reason. You are filled with hate and ignorance while you support the most corrupt administration and the most inept administration in the history of the United States of America.
The 28%ers are ignorant knuckle dragging troglodytes who need to enlist.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:06 pmCan any of our trolls explain how the chronic, pathetic dodging of any responsibility by the Bush mafia comports with their own personal beliefs regarding ethics? Is this just another example of the extreme moral relativism practiced by the wretched hypocrites who continue to kneel before their master Bush?
April 27th, 2007 at 3:07 pmPatrick1,
What on earth are you talking about. Are you justifying the breaking of the Hatch Act simply because ’someone’ else did it first. You sound like my kids. “He did it first dad!!!!” STOP!!!!
April 27th, 2007 at 3:07 pmBy this sort of thinking, can we assume Bush and his buddies are having sex orgies in the Oval Office (paging Jeff Gannon).
April 27th, 2007 at 3:08 pmAny time you back these crooks into a corner, they break out the “Clinton did it too” defense. Then they’ll turn around and claim that Clinton had no morals, etc.
This is the most corrupt, incompetent, lying and dangerous administration in history and it will likely take generations to clean up the mess!
April 27th, 2007 at 3:08 pmvid not working for me … did anyone ask her for examples.
oh wait, we’re talking white house press corpse… nevermind.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:09 pmPatrick-the-loyal-but-retarded-Bush-supplicant:
#8 is directed at you.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:10 pmRemark to the Troll that jacked my name last night; Rachel B, MA, Valient Anus….and all the other names you go by, can’t come out and defend your own platform. You have to do stupid little elementary school pranks to evade taking a position. Your like a little ankle-bitting dog, just a nuisance. So Rachel B you skinny little meth-addict, go score and then go fu@k off.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:10 pmI don’t know if anyone violated the Hatch Act. I do know Bill Clinton sold nuclear secrets to the Chi-Coms for campaign cash.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:11 pmRandom Troll
Great Point!! Wasn’t this supposed to be the White House that brought honor back to the office? I’m sure they would have gotten away with it too, if the voters hadn’t wised up, which they always do.
This is a corrupt hypocritical group of self-righteous ‘leaders’.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:11 pmShe cannot back up her claim “Clinton did it” because it didn’t happen.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:11 pmAfter nearly 7 years, they are still falling back on the childish defense of “he did it too!”
Clinton was investigated up one side and down the other; every thing he said and did was scrutinized — doesn’t she think that if there was even a suspicion that he violated the Hatch Act, they would have acted on it.
Can’t this administration take responsibility for anything???
April 27th, 2007 at 3:12 pmLet’s everybody keep it straight. The latest poll has these retards at 22%.
So, let us all call it like it is. These are now 22%ers.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:12 pmNow I know where the trolls get it from.
Patrick1 – Nice try in chaning the subject. It shows a lack off your lack of argumentation skills.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:13 pmI think Ms. Perino meant that Clinton administration wore briefs, and not boxers.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:13 pmI don’t know if anyone violated the Hatch Act. I do know Bill Clinton sold nuclear secrets to the Chi-Coms for campaign cash.
Comment by Patrick1 — April 27, 2007 @ 3:11 pm
Patrick, what you do know is what your masters tell you. So you don’t know sh*t.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:13 pmKa-plooie. Another lie shot down like a clay disk out of the sky. Nice try though. PULL!!!
April 27th, 2007 at 3:14 pmPatrick1,
Again Patrick, those in glass houses…..
It was just before Christmas 1983 that Donald Rumsfeld, then US presidential envoy to Iraq, slipped quietly into Baghdad to come face to face with the man who would become one of America’s greatest enemies within two decades.
The trip by the current US defense secretary, to pledge US support for Saddam Hussein, marked one of the lowest points of the entire Reagan presidency, and symbolically represents the real legacy of the “Great Communicator”. For Reagan was a president who allowed the US to secretly arm the Iraqi dictator with weapons of mass destruction (WMD), supported Iraq’s military expansion, turned a blind eye to Saddam using chemical weapons against Iran and thereby set in train the events that would lead to George W Bush’s disastrous decision to invade the country in 2002.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0613-03.htm
April 27th, 2007 at 3:14 pmHey Dana, why don’t you try saying “I don’t know” instead of getting all pissy and making stuff up. I did see on the CNN crawl yesterday that Tony Snow is coming back to work some time next week. Proving that everything is relative, I’m glad.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:14 pmMARC RICH?? Whose lawyer was SCOOTER LIBBY?
How about Bush 41 pardoning the Iran/Contra TRAITORS and Orlando Bosch, an INTERNATIONAL TERRORIST who resides in Miami to this day?
WHEN did Clinton’s crew provide PARTISAN briefings to GOVERNMENT STAFF??
More BushTREASON (TM–BushCrimeCo)
April 27th, 2007 at 3:15 pmMore lies, who would have known.
-GSD
April 27th, 2007 at 3:15 pmPatrick1,
Please back up your baseless assertions with some source info. Otherwise we’re are left to believe that you are simply a liar. We don’t want that do we?
April 27th, 2007 at 3:16 pmextend index finger.
purse lips.
move finger up and down over pursed lips.
blubbity-blubbity-blubbity
bang head on floor.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:16 pmWow I combined two sentenced there. Shows you how good my english is.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:17 pmToo bad the Chinese already had nuclear bombs……
-GSD
April 27th, 2007 at 3:17 pmWhen she’s found on her knees in the Oval Office, is she going to say ” I did it to Clinton too?”
April 27th, 2007 at 3:17 pmI love the “Clinton did it too!” defense. My all time favorite.
Also, leave Perino alone. That poor chick is in a terrible position. You can actually watch her getting older by the lie. She loks like she is going to have a meltdown at any minute.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:18 pmPatrick flunked troll school and is working here as a freelancer.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:18 pmI tend to agree with the theme of the moonbats on here. Clinton didn’t do anything as President.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:18 pmClearly, these blathering idiots are engaging in double talk and outright lies. Whether Clinton did it is irrelevant to this White House doing it – as well, it’s been proven that Clinton did not do it. These frauds are losing their grip – both on themselves, their sycophantic Bushites, and all of the whistleblowers who are “outing” them daily. The latest one being…our illustrious Medal of Honor Recipient: George Tenet. I guess he knows what it’s like to be thrown under the bus by those whom you believed in – I say to George: Get with the program. This is PRECISELY what the american public has been feeling since Day One of this Presidency of Smoke & Mirrors, Steal & Conceal.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:19 pmHow much do you suppose they pay her to play the fool?
Or maybe the more accurate question is how little did it take for Perino to sell her integrity?
April 27th, 2007 at 3:20 pmPatrick1,
Are you nothing but a mindless automoton posting here for the sake of a reaction and not actual debate on the issues?
April 27th, 2007 at 3:20 pmI don’t know if anyone violated the Hatch Act. I do know Bill Clinton sold nuclear secrets to the Chi-Coms for campaign cash.
Comment by Patrick1 — April 27, 2007 @ 3:11 pm
Provide link to your proof of this please.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:21 pmI learned in 1st grade that “two wrongs don’t make a right.” The Clinton did it crap doesn’t cut it.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:21 pm#35 Patrick1 – Perhaps you weren’t born yet but Clinton had the economy of this country in the black to the tune of some 8 Billion – of course, you probably “can’t recall” any of that since your obvious stupor probably had you in an altered reality.
Incidentally, we all know who you are : Jake-off! Firehead! Frank Matthews! Idiot trolls are soooooooooo amazingly transparent.
Get a life dude.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:21 pmThe problem with Clinton selling our nuclear technology to the Chi-Coms is that before he did it they couldn’t hit Shanghi with a missle now they can hit LA and San Francisco.
Another Clinton legacy.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:21 pmGood news, Progs…YOU may claim credit for any possible WH employment of the “You did it, too.” defense. TP and their loyal posters whine about others all the time….and do it well, I might add!
Toooodles….
April 27th, 2007 at 3:22 pmI tend to agree with the theme of the moonbats on here. Clinton didn’t do anything as President. Comment by Patrick1 — April 27, 2007 @ 3:18 pm
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, more Clinton Derangement Syndrome.
You should up your dosage, maybe then you’ll stop believing in the tooth fairy, swiftboaters and limbaugh, and leave the world of “Deranged Irrational Clinton Hating”, and join the real world. You know, the world where the MAJORITY of Americans DISAGREE WITH YOU?
St*pid little Jake*ss…
April 27th, 2007 at 3:22 pmClinton did it too.
Why do the Clintons hate America?
Why do the Clintons want the US to be defeated in iraq?
April 27th, 2007 at 3:22 pm38, you got it…
April 27th, 2007 at 3:23 pmAnother solid argument Pat. You continue to prove all of us right when we say that republicans are uninformed, unintelligent, and full of hate.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:23 pmAnd their air-headed bleach blonde, Dana Dipshit, is looking more like a stammering fool with each press conference.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:23 pmPatrick1, stay on topic. We are talking about the Bushies violating the Hatch Act. If you want to talk about something else go create your own blog and have at it.
And poor Dana — she truly believes that, if the Bushies did something, it must be legal. Kind of like everyone else in this totally corrupt administration.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:23 pmYou’re right….Dana DingDong looked visibly shaken and at sea yesterday. They were throwing questions at her which she clearly couldn’t formulate answers (or talking points) for. She HAD a meltdown yesterday…..I don’t see her lasting another month, to be honest.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:24 pmAre you nothing but a mindless automoton posting here for the sake of a reaction and not actual debate on the issues? Comment by Crump’s Brother — April 27, 2007 @ 3:20 pm
Yes, that’s the only tool that the wingnuts have. Poor little st*pid deranged Jake*sses…
The truth has a liberal bias, so resorting to this sort of *childish* tactic is all they have. Using adult forms of communication would ensure they lose, and the poor little cowards would prefer to cheat, steal, lie and act like children (culture of corruption), so they feel *empowered*.
Patrick1 suffers from the same sort of deranged insecurities that drive young men to shoot up schools. Feel pity for the little crazy f*cker.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:24 pmMARC RICH?? Whose lawyer was SCOOTER LIBBY?
Comment by Mr. Bush Goes To Hell — April 27, 2007 @ 3:15 pm
Thank you for bringing up this factoid, MBGTH, it doesn’t get mentioned often enough.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:25 pmIt’s such a shame for idiot trolls to come to these threads with nothing to hang their hat on but blaming Clinton. I guess they still believe he is president; actually MOST americans wish that Clinton was still president, too.
On that point, I concur with the brain-damaged trolls.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:26 pmI tend to agree with the theme of the moonbats on here. Clinton didn’t do anything as President.
But I DID do something!!! I committed TREASON by INVADING A COUNTRY THAT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11,
I have sent 3300 US soldiers and 600000+ Iraqis to their DEATHS.
I am a WAR CRIMINAL, a LIAR, a THIEF, and a TRAITOR TO THE USA.
See you in hell “patrick” (cause I’LL be THERE),
Mr. Bush
April 27th, 2007 at 3:26 pmMURDEROUS WAR CRIMINAL
COXUCKER PUNK TRAITOR TO THE USA (TM–BushCrimeCo)
mikeandjeffsmom, that’s the point. Republicans never care that one of their own is corrupt, or doing illegal acts. They will always justify it as “that’s just politics”, or the “other side do it”. If they can justify torture and murder, because terrorists can do it – do you really think they have a solid enough “moral center” to worry about the Hatch Act?
That’s why wingnuts cling so rigidly to their beliefs that they are personally “religious”, because they have no moral center themselves… Poor little evil b*st*rds.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:26 pmpatrick1,
what does republican jizzum taste like?
April 27th, 2007 at 3:26 pmPatrick1,
SOURCE YOUR ASSERTION! LIAR!
April 27th, 2007 at 3:27 pmClinton didn’t sell Nuclear secrets dumb fu*k. The Chinese already had that. He sold them missile guidance secrets.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:27 pmMARC RICH?? Whose lawyer was SCOOTER LIBBY?
Comment by Mr. Bush Goes To Hell — April 27, 2007 @ 3:15 pm
Thank you for bringing up this factoid, MBGTH, it doesn’t get mentioned often enough.
Comment by JaneESchneider — April 27, 2007 @ 3:25 pm
Yeah, isn’t it strange how they’ll forgive anyone with an (R) around their name for any crime – but that (D) means the person can do no right in their eyes? What a bunch of deranged lunatics!
April 27th, 2007 at 3:28 pmValiant Venus: Everyone on this thread knows who patrick1 is….and the many monikers he uses thinking that he’s pulling a fast one on all of us. NOT! He is mentally deranged and suffers from a psychopathology called schizophrenia and multiple personality disorder….no doubt he has a “gender identity” problem as well from the evidence I’ve seen in his rantings.
He’s pathetic and self-destructive so it’s a good idea to simply ignore him and he’ll slither away to his little hole….but when his pathology comes knocking on that empty noggin’ of his, he’ll simply change his name and reappear.
Sad thing for him is that everyone IS on to him and finds him a blathering, boring fool.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:29 pmis it me, or are Republicant excuses for their behavior SO 1990s? you can’t live off of Bill Clinton forever, folks…
April 27th, 2007 at 3:29 pmYup. Clinton sold NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, RIGHT???
So, WHY didn’t the RAPEUBLICAN MAJORITY base his IMPEACHMENT on THIS instead of lying about a BJ???
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
See you in hell McCain and “patrick” (cause I’LL be THERE),
Mr. Bush
April 27th, 2007 at 3:29 pmMURDEROUS WAR CRIMINAL
COXUCKER PUNK TRAITOR TO THE USA (TM–BushCrimeCo)
Yep. this is an argument that my children give me all the time… but, but, but, so and so did it, too! I don’t buy it from my children, why should I buy it from my President?
April 27th, 2007 at 3:30 pmPatric1 has absolutely SOURCES OR BASIS IN FACT for anything he asserts on these threads. I guess his Repugnant buddies think he’s a fool as well or he wouldn’t be on here strewing his demented detritus on these threads.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:30 pmif they respond “Clinton did it,” the reporters should just say 1) that he’s been out of office for years, and 2) they are asking THIS ADMINISTRATION about THEIR actions, not about a past president…
April 27th, 2007 at 3:30 pmPatrick1,
SOURCE YOUR ASSERTION! LIAR!
Comment by Crump’s Brother — April 27, 2007 @ 3:27 pm
You’d think Patrick1 would be more concerned Halliburton selling illegal Nuclear technology to Iran when Cheney was in charge of them. But hey, they’re just the axis of “evil”, right? What does that matter?
Wingnuts are an extraordinary lot. They can wish away reality faster than one would ever imagine, and imagine a reality that doesn’t exist at an even greater pace. You know, children do that with their imaginary friends on the playground, when they’re miserable and not well socialized. At least Patrick1 learned one skill in school – eh?
April 27th, 2007 at 3:31 pmDid anyone notice how Dana stuttered on several occasions as though her brain was jamming? Her lips were quivvering and she was noticeably very nervous. Poor inexperienced little dweeb being fed to the wolves by BushCo. Her future is over!
April 27th, 2007 at 3:31 pmWhen my parents nailed me for something I did wrong, I would often complain that my older brother did that and worse. They would say that just because my brother did it, didn’t make it right.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:31 pmClinton did it too……..
BUT
when BushCo came into office they made sure NOT to do anything Clinton did.
Try again, Dana Peroxide.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:32 pmKeep on beating this issue, nobody cares.
…but Dana Perino is pretty hot.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:32 pmIt’s high time that this President begins to take responsibility for his actions – and realize that the buck stops at his office. You know that all of the “scandals du jour” are pointing right at him….his numbers will be in the teens soon.!
April 27th, 2007 at 3:32 pmLet’s ask Patrick1 to compare the national debt at the end of Clinton’s term and what it is today under the Shrub…..let’s pound him with it! Don’t ask him anything else….just throw it in his face….that is, if he even has one.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:33 pmPatrick 1 matters less than the last wipe. Press Goddess Dana can say anything she wants and it will matter slightly more the pat’s last wipe. 20 meetings on govt. property to discuss how to help elect republicans is a violation of the Hatch Act.
Now if Pat can’t absorb that, maybe he needs to wipe more.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:34 pmSoon BushCo will be saying “the dog did it”….poor little Barnie….Bush’s prediction may, indeed, come to fruition and he will be left with only Laura (if she doesn’t file those divorce papers she’s holding over his head right now) and Barnie.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:34 pmIf anyone thinks Dana DoLittle is “hot” then we can assume just what they must look like, too. …..yucccccckkkkkk!
April 27th, 2007 at 3:35 pmRingo!!! ALL right!!!
So, Ringo:
WHY do you think Bush and Cheney REFUSED TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH to the 9/11 Commission???
i.e., SWEAR TO GOD TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT their involvement in 9/11, the Bin Ladens, and the SAUDI TERRORIST FINANCIERS (funding Queda)?
See you in hell “ringo” (cause I’LL be THERE),
Mr. Bush
April 27th, 2007 at 3:36 pmMURDEROUS WAR CRIMINAL
COXUCKER PUNK TRAITOR TO THE USA (TM–BushCrimeCo)
And just to show that I’m not being partisan, I also think that Moonbat Kucinich’s mail-order wife is pretty hot as well.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:37 pm#58, exactly. While I hate to see Dems breaking laws and acting like Republiskunks, I also will NOT support them getting away with it. I hate cheaters of all stripes!
April 27th, 2007 at 3:37 pmGotta wonder if Ms Perino knows the Hatch act from the hatch in the submarine that she left open.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:37 pmMrs & Mr Kucinich: http://kucinich.us/files/images/DK%20&%20EJK%202.preview.JPG
April 27th, 2007 at 3:38 pmMr. Bush Goes To Hell,
Listen to your parents, they love you…Seek help.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:39 pmAnd just to show that I’m not being partisan, I also think that Moonbat Kucinich’s mail-order wife is pretty hot as well.
Comment by Ringo
Now we know why your talkingpoints are always crap.
Because you think with your inch worm instead of your brain.
heh
April 27th, 2007 at 3:41 pmShe thought they asked about her “snatch act” after which she hiked her skirt and smoked a cigarette with her na-na.
Sorry, ladies, couldn’t resist.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:43 pmRingo,
Go to Iraq and DIE for the LIES of your Fuhrer, ME!!! YOUR parents said to do it for DER GLORY OV DER VATERLUND!!!
No answer to WHY I didn’t testify UNDER OATH???
Because I and Dickie are TRAITORS to the USA, just like YOU.
Come on now, I need your sorry azz in Iraq to DIE for my LIES. NOW!!!
See you in hell “ringo” (cause I’LL be THERE),
Mr. Bush
April 27th, 2007 at 3:43 pmMURDEROUS WAR CRIMINAL
COXUCKER PUNK TRAITOR TO THE USA (TM–BushCrimeCo)
Their “Party of God” just keeps lying and lying, and their supposed “christian backers” keep condoning and condoning. Are they teaching their children this? Pitiful.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:43 pmA window into Patrick1’s mind; there have been a dozen posts on TP today, and the Clinton post is the first one I see him post on.
clinton, Clinton, CLINTON ooooo, freaks you out doesn’t it?
BTW – history will be VERY kind to Clinton, while Chimpy will be seen as The Worst president in history.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:44 pm#The problem with Clinton selling our nuclear technology to the Chi-Coms is that before he did it they couldn’t hit Shanghi with a missle now they can hit LA and San Francisco.
Another Clinton legacy.
Comment by Patrick1 — April 27, 2007 @ 3:21 pm
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think conservatives would shed too many tears about either of these places being destroyed.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:45 pmI am so sick an tired of Clinton did it too. Is that all they have? It is time they were held accountable for what they do. This Dana babe is arragant and talks down to the American people.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:47 pmHey look, Cindy Sheehan’s freedom fighters are now getting the kiddies into the act.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:49 pmhttp://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21621200-663,00.html
Clinton said Perino was better than Monica…
April 27th, 2007 at 3:50 pmPatrick1 is so hoping he can give Clinton a bj, too!
April 27th, 2007 at 3:51 pmClinton’s thirdlegacy cannot be re-written.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:51 pmHey, Jane…How are you and your hubby doing.? Don’t see enough of you any more, good to see your post’s today….Did you watch the debate’s.?
I don’t think this little blong bimbo is doing very well as press pisser…I liked snow flake better and that’s not saying much….LOL.. Ignoring the troll’s a bit since they are only in the 22% group…Think that number fit’s with the amount of peraphiles, convict’s, wife beaters and insane….BTW anyone know what ever happened to Foley.?
Blessings to you and Wayne.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:52 pmNumber one comeback for the Republic Party: But, but, Bill Clinton did it.
Variation: But, but Bill Clinton did Monica Lewinsky.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:52 pm“BTW – history will be VERY kind to Clinton, while Chimpy will be seen as The Worst president in history.”
why? just because the bush administration drove up (and continues to drive up) the national debt and that debt is owned by china? just because bush has mortgaged the u.s. economy’s future to the very same china that patrick1 is so very much afraid of?
April 27th, 2007 at 3:52 pmbob’s your unc, innocents in LA and San Fran would be considered colateral damage. Just like their reputation.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:54 pmPath to 9/11 is another Clinton legacy.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:55 pmChimpy will be seen as The Worst president in history.â€
————————————————————————
You mean he’ll take Jimmy Carter’s title away?
April 27th, 2007 at 3:55 pmThis is a new classic from the Daily Show.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:56 pm
#I am so sick an tired of Clinton did it too. Is that all they have? It is time they were held accountable for what they do. This Dana babe is arragant and talks down to the American people.
Comment by Mary Poplins — April 27, 2007 @ 3:47 pm
Sadly, it IS all they have.
It never ceases to amaze me how conservatives can routinely label the Clinton adminstration as corrupt and ineffective, and yet still use it as a means of justifying their own actions.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:56 pmListen to your parents, they love you…Seek help.
Comment by Ringo
Coming from you, Richard, that’s hilarious! How is your “band” doing nowadays? I’d heard you fellows were playing a gig in Reno, Nev. Not exactly Shea Stadium, eh, old fellow? Those were the days …
April 27th, 2007 at 3:56 pmThis administration cares for no one, other than themselves and the filthy rich. The sooner Patrick1, Jake, et al realize this, we’ll all be better off.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:56 pmI saw a liberal shouting mathematical axioms at a outlet on the wall.
“What are you doing, my idiot friend?” I asked.
“I’m speaking truth to power, man!” he answered, his left eye twitching.
“Aren’t you taking that a bit literally?”
“SHUT UP, FASCIST!” he screamed at me.
Of course, I was left with no choice but to punch him in his dumb monkey face. Still, it got me thinking: If liberals are speaking “truth to power,” then shouldn’t we conservatives be speaking lies to weakness? It’s worth a shot, at least. And who is the biggest source of weakness? Democrats, of course!
LIES TO TELL DEMOCRATS
“You know how you keep shouting that America has lost the war? You should keep doing that; Americans love that sort of thing.”
“This whole VTech shooting tragedy would be a great time to bring back the issue of gun control. That would be great for your party!”
“Pelosi is an attractive woman. She should release a swimsuit calendar.”
“I think Harry Reid admitting he doesn’t have a penis is a great idea. It would make him a sympathetic character.”
“Ted Kennedy has to be the most coherent speaker you guys have. He should really be out front representing you.”
“You should have DNC.org redirect to the Daily Kos. They’re totally mainstream and won’t alienate people at all.”
“Hillary needs to show more anger; that’s what people want from her.”
“That mouse trap is deactivated; go ahead and take the cheese.”
Frank J.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:57 pmLike I always say “that’s it’s not going to be 800,000 liberals charging over the hill attacking us”.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:57 pmPath to 9/11 is another Reagan/ Bush 1 legacy.
Comment by Patrick1
In the interests of historical accuracy, I’ve fixed your post.
No thanks necessary, just be more alert next time.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:58 pm“Path to 9/11 is another Clinton legacy.
Comment by Patrick1″
failed “thought experiments” and not posting anything relevant to the topic of a thread are yours.
April 27th, 2007 at 3:58 pmHi, my name is Ringo (aka Jake)
I have nothing to add to this thread, so I thought I would derail it using off topic news reports of violence, and then linking them to a greiving mother who actually stood up to this administration, because, really, I have no life here down in my parent’s basement.
Oh, and I enjoy small domesticated farm animals, if you know what I mean
Thanks, I’ll be gone now
April 27th, 2007 at 3:59 pmSir Paul,
Wrong Ringo…I chose my nic after this guy: http://www.spoiltvictorianchild.co.uk/images/Laurel_Aitken.jpg
April 27th, 2007 at 4:00 pmYou mean he’ll take Jimmy Carter’s title away?
Comment by Ringo
We’re talking Grant, or possibly Hoover. But no one can top Reagan’s treason. The absolute worst. Even Bush wouldn’t sell weapons to the same terrorists who held Americans hostage.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:02 pmDRxJ,
I tried to stay on topic when I said that Dana Perino is hot.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:02 pmWo wo wo ringo, Carter was sabataged from within, dinn’t you read “Our endangered values”, or are you like the prez, illiterate? None of your ex’s are building houses for the poor. You’ve only got one left and he’s hanging around Clinton making up for his sons shortfalls.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:04 pmPatrick1, no more Clinton! We are talking about Bush! Can you PLEASE stay on topic!
April 27th, 2007 at 4:04 pmreally, I have no life here down in my parent’s basement.
Even they couldn’t take the paranoia. He’s posting from a library in some little conservative backwater.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:06 pmI have been suggesting that Dana Perinno run from the press secretary job before all the lying and coverup turns her into a tired old hag. However, after this press event I say, go for it Dana, enjoy the job.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:08 pmDana Perino still looks like a drag queen to me.
She is not pretty. Inside or out.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:09 pmIt doesn’t matter that Perino is wrong bout “Clinton did it too.” She said it on television, and nowadays, that’s enough to make it true to the mouth-breathing troglodytes that comprise the Bush base.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:09 pmPatricknone why are you guys so fixated on Clinton anyway, the American people spoke with two landslide elections, and by landslide I mean he had more votes, did I dumb it down enough for you?
April 27th, 2007 at 4:10 pmYou’ve only got one left and he’s hanging around Clinton making up for his sons shortfalls.
Comment by the Lone Voice of Reason
And hoping no-one notices that he’s more at fault for the current situation than anyone else living. And for the deaths of innocent Iraqis after the first gulf war, when Bush encouraged them to overthrow Saddam, and then stood by as Saddam killed thousands.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:11 pmPatrick 1
If you want to speak about “Chi-coms” you might want to include Ambrose Tung Yung who gave 2.5 million worth of “loan guarantees” to the RNC through Haley Barbour.
When Fred Thompson was investigating Chinese connections, he had to abort the investigation because he realized that the RNC was involved in funds that were 294 times the amount that Johnny what’s his name donated to Clinton’s campaign.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:12 pmJust for the record, I voted for Clinton….in ‘92.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:13 pmYeah and you’re an independent too. Tell us all about it. We are buying it.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:14 pmOn the one hand, she’s not a rabid @$$hat like her predecessors. On the other, she’s a blithering idiot. On balance, I think I prefer the rabid @$$hats — at least I don’t feel guilty for thinking of them as enemies of the people.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:14 pm“Let’s ask Patrick1 to compare the national debt at the end of Clinton’s term and what it is today under the Shrub…..let’s pound him with it! Don’t ask him anything else….just throw it in his face….that is, if he even has one.” Comment by veritas
Dear liar-tas – Let’s compare THE surplus “Clintonistas” brag about and the actual surplus Clinton left. Let’s compare what the WTC massacre might have cost the economy – had Mr. Bill been President………Your repetition of official Dem talking points doesn’t necessarily make them true….but it does make you a VERY good and LOYAL listener.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:16 pmDear Sponge – In the interest of bi-partisanship, please tell us the last Republican presidential candidate you voted for.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:18 pmPatrick1: How old were you during the Clinton years? Just curious. You seem to be a juvenile moron who got all his facts off FAUX Noise and Rush Limptard.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:21 pmWhy the hell would I vote for an anti-American republican? Stupid troll. Don’t you have an appointment to get that thing removed from your face?
And you don’t do anything bi-partisan, so go fuck yourself, after you have that thing removed.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:23 pmIn the interest of bi-partisanship, please tell us the last Republican presidential candidate you voted for.
Comment by valiant venus
Only an rich person or an idiot would vote republican. That’s your “base.”
April 27th, 2007 at 4:25 pmLet’s compare what the WTC massacre might have cost the economy – had Mr. Bill been President
Yes, lets. Clinton would have marshalled all the resources at his disposal to thwart the WTC massacre – as shown by Sandy Berger’s intelligence briefings, not taken another vacation, after being in office for six months.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:28 pmComment by valiant venus — April 27, 2007 @ 4:16 pm
Something seriously wrong with a female in the 28% group of troglodytes.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:29 pmShe got the “Clinton did it too” from Roger dumbx2, Jerk Jake, JJ Trailor Trash, Dale the loser, Valiantdouchebag, Exlax….proof that she (Rove) has been looking at the TP site.
Hating the Repuke Mafia daily
April 27th, 2007 at 4:29 pmLet’s keep it straight people. The latest poll has these lunatics at 22%. They are now 22%ers. Nothing more.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:31 pmVV, the budgets contained the surplus, which was then used to decrease the national debt. There was still quite a bit of debt left, of course, from the Bush1 and Reagan years. You remember — when “deficits don’t matter” was the mantra?
I don’t understand your point about the cost of WTC with Clinton versus the cost with Bush. But I am confident that, if Clinton received a PDB titled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US” he would have paid much more attention than the Idiot in Chief did. He may have even cut short his vacation. And if it happened on his watch anyway he would have stopped reading about the goat and gone out and done something presidential.
The man who should have been president in 2001, Mr. Gore, would also have paid more attention, btw.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:33 pmPerino gave a ridiculous and defensive answer to a reasonable question. Usually, the Administration’s statements are ridiculous and offensive.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:34 pmLet’s keep it straight people. The latest poll has these lunatics at 22%. They are now 22%ers. Nothing more.
Comment by Spudge_Boy — April 27, 2007 @ 4:31 pm
Plenty wrong with the troglodytes but female troglodyes, knuckle dragging troglodytes…come on!
April 27th, 2007 at 4:36 pmAhhhh….Spongey…..I see – with you, mono-partisanship is a matter of perspective. You expect people to vote for (what we might consider) anti-American Progs and trolls. Only your ilk can vote strictly by ideology and be considered intelligent and measured?
You’re still tooo precious! Hypocritical – - but precious…..
April 27th, 2007 at 4:37 pmA typical conservative argument:
Somebody did something wrong, so it’s OK if we do something wrong.
WORST. ARGUMENT. EVER.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:37 pmTROLL ACTION ALERT: Condition = Extreme Desperation
REPEAT: Condition = Extreme Desperation
During “Extreme Desperation”, all trolls are required to jettison any and all remaining notions of truth and reason and immediately switch to “Full Bullshit Mode”. Repeat: Switch to “Full Bullshit Mode” immediately!
That is all.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:51 pmDear MJmom – Thanks for helping veritas – “helicopter moms” can be a good thing when we’re not quite sure what the kids are going to do.
My point about the budget that Dems were crowing about is: the ten year out surplus Dems cited was NOT collected yet – but was figured into budget projections. (Non-partisan Hint: Not smart to spend money you don’t have….yet. It’s kind of like banking on “your inheritance”…and your parents are wonderfully alive and healthy.)
In regard to the PDB – consider that had President Clinton handled bin Laden when he was offered him, we might well have deceased neighbours and relatives with us today….you remember? Those who who perished on 9/11?
Finally – your moronic reference the reading of the goat story is pathetic. The President had received info which needed to be accepted, verified and digested. NOTHING he did, or didn’t do, in the first 5 minutes of hearing the news changed the outcome in any way shape or form.
Mr. Gore lost the election Constitutionally – why don’t liberals like our Constitution? The electoral college is described in plain language – yet your persistent whining makes me hope you teach Mike and Jeff better sportsmanship than you indicate.
Thanks for playing………really!
April 27th, 2007 at 4:52 pmI don’t expect any of you trolls to vote for anybody but anti-American republican. I am not sure what the fuck you are talking about. Somebody here said that they voted for Clinton and I said I didn’t believe them. That has nothing to do with me wanting for any of you trolls to vote deomcratic (yeah right) or us voting republican (yeah right). You just pulled something out of your a$$ as usual. Stupid fucking troll, go get that thing taken off your face.
Poodles….
April 27th, 2007 at 4:54 pmSpudge-Boy..LOL..Pretty soon it will be like the old time elevator people in huge department stores.., starting at the top, dropping fast…5th floor, ladies wear, 4th floor men’s ware, 3rd floor childrens wear, 2nd floor appliances and home care, main floor restraunt, restroom’s, day care, basement and parking garage reserved for the reich wing nut cases….22% and dropping fast..Blessings
April 27th, 2007 at 4:55 pmTell that to the fu*king republicans troll.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:56 pmBarfy – Were those the secrets Sandy Berger borrowed? The files he stashed in his pants?? BTW, if you or any other Prog-lodyte was profiled or inconvenienced in August or Sept ‘01, can you imagine the whiny “Civil Liberties mewling? Well, since you’re used to whining, most likely, it wouldn’t bother you….
But we can agree on one thing…it’s a beautiful day here in San Diego!
April 27th, 2007 at 4:57 pmGod I hate the press! Do we always have to point out to them what their follow-up should be or how to do their job in general?
Can someone please ask the esteemed Senator from UT, the honorable Orrin Hatch or at least a Hatch Act co-sponsor if what Rove and his minions did is a violation and if anything the Clinton’s did was a violation? Wouldn’t the honorable Senator be a good judge of what a violation of the Hatch Act might look like? I know he’s a Bushie too but someone at least should get him on the record here.
WTF!?
April 27th, 2007 at 5:05 pmSpongey – In your manic-defense mode – please tell me when or where I have EVER defended the SHAMEFUL and out-of-control spending by either Dems or Repubs?? The answer, precious – - NEVER!!!!
In the past, I was opposed to term limits – I have changed my mind and completely support a limitation of 2 terms for Senate and 4 terms for the House. I don’t care which party is in POWER – it seems the longer the wolf guards the henhouse the more eggs are missing!! Dems proved it with 40 years of corrupt control and Repubs proved it in 12.
So you see….I AM bipartisan……Hooray!
April 27th, 2007 at 5:08 pm#42 – Patrick1,
Actually the leakage of US rocket intell was revealed during the Clinton administration. It however dates back to 1984, a bit before Clinton took office. This report details most of it:
http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/crs/98-485.pdf
April 27th, 2007 at 5:09 pm#120 vv
Let’s compare what the WTC massacre might have cost the economy – had Mr. Bill been President
You mean 9/11? Are you saying that 9/11 caused the budget deficit? I guess it wasn’t that big a deal to Bush and the GOP-led Congress. They still kept giving out those tax cuts to the rich.
April 27th, 2007 at 5:13 pmPerino states that she knows “Clinton did it too†is this false statement to press and american people. She stated that she knew.
April 27th, 2007 at 5:22 pmPerino and the Bush administration blatantly lies their ass off in order to fabricate a false equivalence to excuse their own breaking of the law. In other news, sun rises in the east, rain is wet, yadda yadda yadda.
April 27th, 2007 at 5:26 pmChimpy – Our economy took a HUGE hit on 9/11 that even Mr. Clinton, brilliant hedonist that he is, could not have forseen. Measuring business trends and the subsequent response to the attack (stock market, insurance claims, the airline industry, the energy sector, etc.) and factoring government expenditures, and response costs would have been more severe without the proven economic stimulus of tax cuts. The econ slowdown and the dot.com bust were mitigated by the engine of an economic system that is the envy of the world.
Have a great weekend, Chimpy!!
April 27th, 2007 at 5:28 pmThanks for playing………really!
Comment by valiant venus — April 27, 2007 @ 4:52 pm
VV, playing is exactly what you do. It’s much easier to play with the facts than to use them accurately. Do your delusions lead you to believe that anybody here doesn’t know what you’re doing.
And really you should stop watching Fox News. You idiots who keep spewing the lies they’ve learned there are like the people who read the National Enquirer and quot it like the truth.
It is why progressives have so much disdain for you idiot neocons who keep reciting the same crap over and over. If this is your job, you suck at it big time. Try not sounding like a total parrot of the retard 22% that still believes all this bullsh*t.
April 27th, 2007 at 5:47 pmi actually pity these “clinton did it too” thumbsuckers, to be obsessed with a man (and his cock) a good six years AFTER he left office. what sad, pathetic, lives they lead to fixate on him, rather than what positive things they are doing in office. eeerrrrrrr, on second thought, they better stick to the “clinton did it too” strategy
April 27th, 2007 at 5:47 pmThe econ slowdown and the dot.com bust were mitigated by the engine of an economic system that is the envy of the world.
Comment by valiant venus — April 27, 2007 @ 5:28 pm
Delusion is a GOP character defect.
April 27th, 2007 at 5:49 pmOur economy took a HUGE hit on 9/11 that even Mr. Clinton, brilliant hedonist that he is, could not have forseen.
Comment by valiant venus — April 27, 2007 @ 5:28 pm
Really, how could a brilliant man like Clinton foresee that an idiot like Bush would 1) get elected by the neocon retards and 2) pay no attention to warnings about OBL and then instead of finishing the hunt for him head off to invade Iraq while at the same time cutting taxes.
Sure you are a really young and ignorant twit so it may be hard for you to understand that people as stupid as Bush have never been elected to this position before although the alzheimered Ronald Reagan came close.
Only the young can be as confident as you are maintaining the party line of a corrupt party like you do. You really don’t have any idea how little you know but please try to maintain some semblance of humility until you grow up.
April 27th, 2007 at 5:55 pmCan’t defend a Republican with a true defense.
By definition, a Republican’s defense IS a false defense.
those guys wouldn’t recognize a level playing field if it was their front lawn.
Hey VV, I’ve made about 6 million on the Euro in the last 5 years – guess whose economy I envy – dolt.
April 27th, 2007 at 5:57 pmSure, Tom……
April 27th, 2007 at 6:06 pmShane – Have you EVER had a point? Or a purpose for that matter? Maybe you could apply for the “employment opportunity” under the heading “ECHO chamber”……
But let’s look at the bright side – If redundancy were a virtue, you’d be a saint….
April 27th, 2007 at 6:12 pm(to Shane) But let’s look at the bright side – If redundancy were a virtue, you’d be a saint….
Comment by vermin venus
I think that’s what could be said about you, dear.
April 27th, 2007 at 6:23 pmDidja get your check today Valient?, jeez.
April 27th, 2007 at 6:51 pmIf Bush pulled the wings off butterflys, his apologists would claim “but Clinton did it too”. TP, I STILL am unable to use the formating. Please check into it, apparently some others are in the same boat.
April 27th, 2007 at 7:00 pmI can’t figure out how to use formatting either.
April 27th, 2007 at 7:01 pmAhh, the old ‘two wrongs make a right’ justification. I giggle whenever politicians use this one. The funniest thing of all, Americans buy this stuff from repubs. and dems. over and over again. Dont’ forget, throw away your vote in ‘08–vote rebulican or democrat!
April 27th, 2007 at 7:02 pmWatching a liar squirm.
April 27th, 2007 at 7:43 pmMarie; I have use formatting up until recently, but it has not responded in lately. I’ve read other posters having the same trouble. TP(Houston) we have a problem.
April 27th, 2007 at 7:50 pmWhen she’s found on her knees in the Oval Office, is she going to say †I did it to Clinton too?â€
I’d have to strongly dispute that Dana is giving anybody BJs. If you watch the video you will see that she can barely open her mouth.
‘Course that might be adequate for the Overcompensator-in-Chief. Don’t be fooled by the codpiece.
But really, she seems so jacked on caffeine or cocaine or something, I think she could do some serious damage to the Executive Branch.
April 27th, 2007 at 7:50 pmThere is something seriously wrong with a female who claims to be a 28%er…a knuckle dragging troglodyte.
April 27th, 2007 at 8:10 pmThe new docudump seems to be padded out with ungainly masses of transcript already in the public domain verbatim from a previous hearing on the subject. Most of the rest of the documents portray a DOJ obsessed with justifying its actions under investigation, and spending yet even more of our tax money to do so. Also of intense interest is the chart thoughtfully provided of documents still not yet disclosed, one of which refers to an email discussing a voicemail left in response to an inquiry regarding the dismissal of Lam, and another discussing none other than the topic of the email regarding the voicemail itself. Most quotidian. All very proper it seems, quite legitimate, nothing to see here, move along shall we? 120 days may not be enough for transitional purposes, but it could conceivably be enough to structure certain diversions, all of the foregoing, possibly, among them.
=*=
April 27th, 2007 at 9:38 pmSomeone should check and see if Dana has a reflection in the mirror anymore, or casts a shadow, has a heartbeat, etc, etc…
April 27th, 2007 at 10:28 pmDear Stupidity – Hillary Clinton reports that Dana DOES NOT have a heartbeat, cast a shadow or a reflection in the mirror. Hilliary has the same problem so it’s not surprising she would know…..
April 27th, 2007 at 10:53 pmThere is something seriously wrong with female troglodyte.
April 27th, 2007 at 11:14 pmBush seems increasingly to aspire to the Clinton administration.
April 27th, 2007 at 11:42 pmThere is something wrong with women who claim to be knuckle dragging troglodytes…Coulter, Malkin, Condi, etc.
Discount anything from these people.
April 28th, 2007 at 12:03 amOh, goody! Snow is returning. His lies are so much smoother. Perino can’t lie like a true republican. She’s young, though. Lying is like fine wine…it gets better with age.
I love the whole ‘MOM! HE’S TOUCHING ME!’ defense. Well, Dana, if he jumped off a bridge would you follow? Nevermind. I already know the answer. Sheeesh.
April 28th, 2007 at 10:46 amBull. If Clinton had done it too, Ken Star would have been all over that crap in two seconds flat. Instead, he had to settle for sniffing Monica’s panties. As much as the left likes to characterize him as a prudish moral scold, I’m sure Ken would much rather have investigated something truly illegal, instead of adultery with the office slut.
April 28th, 2007 at 1:38 pmIs Bill Clinton the GOP’s new messiah? For the past six years it seems that he has served as their moral guidepost. “Thereby the grace of Bill Clinton go I,” is used to justify Republican acts that he also did, but now includes deeds done in his name. I hope that the GOP can someday escape from the yoke of his influence and lead us to a glorious future based on a visionary religious past (500 – 1000 AD Europe would do nicely).
April 28th, 2007 at 2:47 pmTalking Points for GOP presnidents:
– If I did it here at home, then it’s OK because it was certainly no worse than Clinton. (Whitewater!!!1! Vince Foster!!11!!)
– If I did it overseas, then it’s OK because it was surely no worse than Saddam. (Rape rooms!!!1! Bekaa Valley!!!11!!)
– Any good stuff that happened halfway through my first inaugural was obviously a sign from God in honor of my election.
– The bad stuff that keeps happening six years into my presidency is all my predecessor’s fault.
– If I did it and the outcome was bad, then it obviously would’ve been far worse had I not acted as I did.
– If I didn’t do it and things improved, then maybe I did it after all.
Next Week: “Taking Responsibility”: A phrase better mouthed than exemplified.
April 28th, 2007 at 5:56 pmClinton? Isn’t he the guy who is running around with George H.W. Bush? Clinton really sullied his image being chummy with the son of Prescott, Hitler’s banker. Clinton is a Democrat but he is almost as dishonest as the Nazis running the government today.I guess that qualifies him to take the blame for some of Bush’s less horrendous crimes.
Dana Perino is a blonde, blue eyed, lying poster girl Nazi of there ever was one.
April 28th, 2007 at 6:41 pmtoni snowjob is back monday. deny perdition is headed to hell for sure because she not only lied to beat the band with every “ummm”, body twitch, and “that’s a ridiculous question” but she did a lousy job of it.
snowjob’s not ready, either, so you know dumya is getting desperate.
is Faux Noise ready to ship geraldo over?
April 28th, 2007 at 8:51 pmGreat, another opportunity to share my very own wingnut lightbulb joke:
Q: How many wingnuts does it take to change a light bulb?
A: None! Bill Clinton did it!
April 29th, 2007 at 10:57 ammy name for her was dana “ummm” peroxide
it is now deny perdition because that gal will have the hardest time getting into heaven.
May 3rd, 2007 at 2:47 am