Think Progress

Broder: Victory in Iraq ‘really doubtful.’

David Broder, who has repeatedly attacked Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) for saying the Iraq war “is lost,” said today on XM radio that it is “really doubtful” President Bush will be able “to salvage something that would look like a victory in Iraq.”

UPDATE: Broder also responded to recent criticism of him online: “I am not a fan of the blogs, and the blogs are not fans of mine.”

UPDATE II: Broder stands by his April 26 column on Reid, “The Democrats’ Gonzales”:

David Broder said he wouldn’t change anything in his April 26 column, which angered many readers and caused 50 members of the Senate Democratic Caucus to write a letter criticizing Broder in Friday’s Washington Post. [...]

The columnist also said he was “not surprised” that his Thursday piece drew such a negative reaction from the 50 senators and most of the many readers who flooded WashingtonPost.com with comments. “This war is so unpopular and for very good reason,” said Broder. “I’ve written many columns critical of this administration’s actions in Iraq, and most of the response of readers to those columns has been: ‘Right on.’”

Greg Sargent has more.



27 Responses to “Broder: Victory in Iraq ‘really doubtful.’”

  1. proudleftists says:

    It is time for Mr. Broder to retire.


  2. Tom3 says:

    Another Reich Wingnut comes to his senses.


  3. ForTruth says:

    There’s gotta be a way to spin that shit into a victory, so we can get out of there.


  4. whiteyfresh says:

    I GUESS HE THINKS NOONE LISTENS TO RADIO ANYMORE


  5. artiejoe68 says:

    Harry Reid, David Broder, George Tenet. Who’s next? Maybe Cheney will find God and admit to his numerous lies and fabrications on the “threat” called Iraq. Bring on Hillary!!!


  6. Raging Gurrl says:

    I get it. It’s only OK if he says the Iraq War is lost.


  7. Roger says:

    Man, just when you think these people couldn’t be bigger hypocrites and jackasses they manage to go below even the lowest of expectations.

    I hope that have that audio queued up – along with Broder’s attacks on Reid – the next time he’s on Meet The Press.


  8. Not Canadian says:

    Report says terror attacks up sharply

    By MATTHEW LEE, Associated Press Writer 30 minutes ago

    WASHINGTON – Terrorist attacks worldwide shot up 25 percent last year, particularly in Iraq where extremists used chemical weapons and suicide bombers to target crowds, according to a new State Department report.

    George W. Bush and terrorism, BFF.


  9. Chris L says:

    I wonder what Condi Rice’s definition of “victory” would be? Broder, what is the opposite of “victory”?


  10. stopthecons says:

    There is NO possibility of “victory” without killing nearly every single person that resists a foreign occupying force.

    How that can be accomplished, no one seems to admit.

    The reality, though, is that anytime aggression is used to solve problems in foreign policy, it ends up being a mess (to say the least)

    countless thousands are murdered, deficits are massive, and liberties are restricted at home.

    It’s time for a new direction. A foreign policy based on peace and prosperity – one where the US doesn’t meddle in foreign affairs, where the US doesn’t spend billions to prop up ruthless dictators, where the US doesn’t invade nations – period.

    Some reading….“A Foreign Policy for America”
    http://www.populistamerica.com/a_foreign_policy_for_america


  11. chimpeach says:

    In David Broder’s next column he’ll be calling for his own resignation.


  12. Spicy "D" Broder says:

    Ah, you people! There’s a BIG difference between saying the “war is lost” and that victory is “really doubtful.” On the won had you’re saying the war is lost, and on the other you’re saying that the war is just kinda lost.

    Geez!


  13. hellinabucket says:

    so the difference between Border’s and Reid’s view of Iraq is one see’s it’s already a lost cause and the other see’s it will most likely be a lost cause. Realist get’s slandered and the dreamer does the slandering.


  14. clb72 says:

    You break up with someone. Someone’s response: It’s not what you said, it’s the WAY you said it.

    Not convincing in either context.


  15. Kate Henry says:

    OMG, and I am sure that Mr. Broder will be apologizing to Harry Reid soon. Don’t hold your breath. The Republics and Neocons never apologize and rarely even admit they made a mistake.


  16. ''''|_ep''|'epi says:

    Ah, you people! There’s a BIG difference between saying the “war is lost” and that victory is “really doubtful.” On the won had you’re saying the war is lost, and on the other you’re saying that the war is just kinda lost.

    Geez!

    Comment by Spicy “D” Broder

    Then, show me, sir, where this was ever called a war? Do you agree this was a police action? Was not this war about, as declared in the the resolution, means to use force and to enforce certain WMD claims?

    This ‘war’, I remind you, was called operation Iraqi freedom, not GWOT.


  17. Kate Henry says:

    “I hope that have that audio queued up – along with Broder’s attacks on Reid – the next time he’s on Meet The Press.”

    It’s never going to happen as long as Tim Russert is on MTP. I can’t believe he is still acting as a Bush apologist after they way they trashed him in the Libby trial. But, I expect he is being paid hansomely for his loyalty. I just wonder how he sleeps at night.


  18. Shane says:

    It’s never going to happen as long as Tim Russert is on MTP. I can’t believe he is still acting as a Bush apologist after they way they trashed him in the Libby trial. But, I expect he is being paid hansomely for his loyalty. I just wonder how he sleeps at night.

    Comment by Kate Henry — April 30, 2007 @ 5:24 pm

    I’m hoping it’s all tied up with the DC Madame. That would be so much fun, to find out all these guys are complicit because of blackmail and not ideology. It would make some sense anyway.


  19. John S says:

    I think he’s just auditioning for the Tony Snow(job) position. If Hilary wins, he might get it. And I’m not a fan of Hilary.


  20. ''''|_ep''|'epi says:

    Okay/Fine SDB

    Let us dig shallowly deep.
    Biblical, or not, Americas Oil Gluton future, driven by consumers (that is you SUV drivers) have helped, since 1938, corrupt a world.

    Nevah da neg that’s one hard tuff nut to swallow no matter what party ideology you buy into.

    We have, by the way of energy, become crack addicts. Blame no one, for if you do choose to point a finger, threes point back.


  21. powkat says:

    Shane -yes, yes, oh god, yes!

    I can’t wait to see who was ‘ordering pizza’ from the DC madame. I don’t care which side of the aisle, either, but I’m betting a lot of them are family values fellas.


  22. RUCerious says:

    Lessee, victory “really doubtful”, war “not lost”,
    translates into…
    stay there until Broder figures out what the hell he means.
    Sounds like the chymp’s plan, ey whot?


  23. gotaclue says:

    he obviously failed to read any of the 46 pages of criticism he received for publishing his asinine comments.

    Time to retire to sussex and keep bees.

    Then you’d be doing somethig useful


  24. Gregor Samsa says:

    Does this mean Broder still has to learn to engage mind before mouth opens? Or, in this case, before fingers type?

    At any rate, it seems Broder has become an embarrassment even to himself, and there will be an episode in about, uh oh, six weeks or so where he will have apologise for having bungled Pres Bush’s case. Or, like in this case, where he should, but won’t, apologise.

    He’s yet another brain-dead Bush cultist who tried to debate against reality, and lost the argument.


  25. eve says:

    Broder — working hard to make himself sound even more useless.


  26. NatteringNabob says:

    Whaaaat? Is he saying he believes the same thing we do, except his manners are too dignified to say such a thing? as opposed to us, the unwashed masses.

    What a hypocrite.


  27. tarazan says:

    This guy talks like an idiot, on one hand he says that there is no victory in Iraq,and Bush might not be able to salvage something like a victory….
    on the other hand he is standing by his article attacking Senator Reid for saying just about the same thing…he is saying…war is lost…



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll