Bush’s guests.
By on May 7th, 2007 at 5:54 pm
Bush’s guests.
Included in the list of dignitaries invited to tonight’s state dinner in honor of Queen Elizabeth: Elisabeth Hasselbeck, host of The View, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger; former Secretary of State Colin Powell; NFL Quarterback and Bush supporter Peyton Manning; NBC White House correspondent David Gregory; and Newsweek White House correspondent Richard Wolffe. Full list here.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Bush
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
Wha??? Where’s Stephen Colbert?
May 7th, 2007 at 6:00 pmWho invited Gregory? He should be disinvited for his traitorous views.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:01 pmOT, but worth the mention –
From CNN:
Iraq’s top Sunni official has set a May 15 deadline for pulling his entire bloc out of the government — a potentially devastating blow to reconciliation efforts within Iraq. Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi told CNN: “If the constitution is not subject to major changes, definitely, I will tell my constituency frankly that I have made the mistake of my life when I put my endorsement to that national accord,” he said.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:01 pm“Mrs. Wendy Paulson”
Isn’t that the Snapple Lady?
May 7th, 2007 at 6:01 pm“Elisabeth Hasselbeck, host of The View”
She is Bush’s idea of journalism… Dumb, blonde and giggly.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:04 pm“Elisabeth Hasselbeck, host of The Viewâ€
She is Bush’s idea of journalism… Dumb, blonde and giggly.
Comment by unbelievable — May 7, 2007 @ 6:04 pm
Dumber than a box of rocks. And if she didn’t hear it on Fox Snooze of Limbaugh’s show it didn’t happen.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:08 pmNow everybody keep in mind that Peyton Manning staged a Super Bowl “celebration” at the White House 3 months after the Super Bowl actually happened.
Why? Was Bush too busy?
No. Go take a look at the date it happened and the date Pat Tillman’s brother Kevin Tillman testified in front of congress. That way sports writers would be all abuzz about football + White House instead of football + Congress.
Fu*king scum bag. I used to like him and rooted for him in the Super Bowl. Now I hope he breaks his throwing arm and never gets to play again.
One rich red neck is just like all the rest.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:08 pmWhat do you folks expect, dinner with Rosie? C’mon…would YOU have dinner with people that slander you on a daily basis? Is this really news??
May 7th, 2007 at 6:09 pm“Elisabeth Hasselbeck, host of The Viewâ€
She is Bush’s idea of journalism… Dumb, blonde and giggly.
Comment by unbelievable
As opposed by Rosie ODonnell…vulgar, obnoxious, brunette and ugly.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:11 pmFu*king scum bag. I used to like him and rooted for him in the Super Bowl. Now I hope he breaks his throwing arm and never gets to play again.
One rich red neck is just like all the rest.
Comment by Spudge_Boy — May 7, 2007 @ 6:08 pm
Great catch, EVERYTHING is scripted.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:12 pmNow everybody keep in mind that Peyton Manning staged a Super Bowl “celebration†at the White House 3 months after the Super Bowl actually happened.
Why? Was Bush too busy?
No. Go take a look at the date it happened and the date Pat Tillman’s brother Kevin Tillman testified in front of congress. That way sports writers would be all abuzz about football + White House instead of football + Congress.
Fu*king scum bag. I used to like him and rooted for him in the Super Bowl. Now I hope he breaks his throwing arm and never gets to play again.
One rich red neck is just like all the rest.
Comment by Spudge_Boy
Petyon Manning is a great quarterback, and considered by many as the smartest and hardest working quarterback in the N.F.L.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:12 pmWhat do you folks expect, dinner with Rosie? C’mon…would YOU have dinner with people that slander you on a daily basis? Is this really news??
Comment by craig mack — May 7, 2007 @ 6:09 pm
Rosie wouldn’t go, neither would most of the posters here. Neocons are the hypocrites not progressives.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:13 pmJust another reason to hate Peyton Manning.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:14 pm“And if she didn’t hear it on Fox Snooze of Limbaugh’s show it didn’t happen.
Comment by Shane — May 7, 2007 @ 6:08 pm”
I’d rather see Colbert on the list, for the same reasons :)
I think the neocons have finally clued in that he’s satire after he spanked O’Reilly in his own house… Oh well, it was fun watching them think he was one of them while it lasted.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:14 pmIs a Chuck Hagel. He talks big, but reports nothing.
He is the one who said at the White House Press Corp meeting that it wasn’t the press’s job to root out and investigate politicians.
He believes he is a repeater, not a reporter.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:15 pm“As opposed by Rosie ODonnell…vulgar, obnoxious, brunette and ugly.
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 6:11 pm”
Really? Then why are YOU the one bringing her up?
May 7th, 2007 at 6:16 pmManning’s football prowess doesn’t make up for the fact that he’s a douchbag.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:17 pmI can’t wait to see the menu……………
May 7th, 2007 at 6:18 pmPeyton Manning may be a great quarterback but apparently his thinking processes do not extend off the field, where he seems to be loathe in challenging the lies and superpatriotism [patriotism which does not seem to include military service for those who advocate war] that is put forth by this administration.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:19 pmRosie…!!!…
[not invited]
Remember what Bush said:”Either you are with us or against us’…
May 7th, 2007 at 6:19 pmYeah, Peyton is off da list…
But hey, he’s a great football player, and the last time I checked, that does not equate him to a level of intelligence that would make me trust him above anyone else…
He’s just an admirer of an IDIOT! Hey, his DAD is a JERK and his BROTHER a CRY BABY!
Sounds like a well rounded family to me…
May 7th, 2007 at 6:19 pmAs opposed by Rosie ODonnell…vulgar, obnoxious, brunette and ugly.
Comment by John M
You forgot “smart as a whip.”
May 7th, 2007 at 6:20 pmWhat! No Brittany Spears, Cam’ron, Ron Jeremey, David Hasselhoff, Glenn Beck, Pamela Lee, Howard Stern, Michael Jackson or Harry Belafonte?
-GSD
May 7th, 2007 at 6:20 pm“As opposed by Rosie ODonnell…vulgar, obnoxious, brunette and ugly.
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 6:11 pmâ€
Really? Then why are YOU the one bringing her up?
Comment by unbelievable
Because, the person she argues with most Elizabeth Hasselbeck was on the list…please try and keep up.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:21 pmYou forgot “smart as a whip.â€
Comment by Zooey
I have never heard her described that way.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:21 pmSorry to go off topic…
But…
================================================
Worst job creation record since Hoover Administration. A growing economy should be good news for those seeking jobs. But over the course of President Bush’s term in office, his Administration has the worst overall job creation record since Herbert Hoover more than 70 years ago.
Overall non-farm payroll employment has increased by just 5.2 million since President Bush took office in January 2001 compared with 22.7 million during the Clinton presidency. Overall employment growth has averaged just 70,000 per month under President Bush – much lower than the approximately 150,000 jobs needed each month to keep up with population growth. It was not uncommon to see monthly job gains of 300,000 and even 400,000 during economic expansions under previous Administrations.
Private sector job creation has been especially poor during the Bush presidency, with an average annual job growth rate of only 0.5 percent per year since 2001. Just 3.8 million private sector jobs have been created during the Bush presidency, compared with over 20 million private sector jobs during the Clinton presidency.
The manufacturing sector, often the source of jobs with good pay and benefits, has lost three million jobs since the start of the Bush Administration. Nearly half of the jobs created since 2001 were part-time and freelance positions without benefits. This slow pace of private sector job creation is particularly troubling given that we are so far into the economic recovery.
================================================
Let’s hear it for all the BUSH nut-huggers!!! A round of applause for all you broke dumb-*sses out there!!!
Take a bow, and leave your tips at the gas pump!!!
http://democrats.senate.gov/dpc/dpc-new.cfm?doc_name=fs-110-1-70
May 7th, 2007 at 6:22 pm“I can’t wait to see the menu……………
Comment by Raven — May 7, 2007 @ 6:18 pm”
I bet four courses of raw meats of endangered species, puppies’ blood and for desert – flambed entrails of black death row inmates…
May 7th, 2007 at 6:24 pmI have never heard her described that way.
Comment by John M
You just did. I’M describing her that way.
Try to keep up.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:24 pm“And this seat, Your Highness,… is Peyton’s place.”
May 7th, 2007 at 6:25 pmIf Colin Powell walks through the doors of the WH for dinner this evening, I don’t ever want to hear him complain about this admin again.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:25 pm“Remember what Bush said:â€Either you are with us or against us’…
Comment by tarazan — May 7, 2007 @ 6:19 pm”
He stole that line from Jesus
“He that is not with me is against me.” (Matthew 12:30)
May 7th, 2007 at 6:25 pmPetyon Manning is a great quarterback, and considered by many as the smartest and hardest working quarterback in the N.F.L.
Comment by John M
And that has no bearing on his piss poor choice to follow the worst president in the history of the U.S.A.
When it all boils down he’s just another dumb jock not worthy of carrying Tillman’s jockstrap.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:25 pmI have never heard her described that way.
Comment by John M
You just did. I’M describing her that way.
Try to keep up.
Comment by Zooey
Actually I read it…try and keep up.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:27 pmI wonder how Her Majesty will react when Bush puts his feet up on the table after dinner.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:28 pmAh, the new Royalty meets the Old Royalty. The new mad King George (MKG)(0, of Crawford) meets one of the descendants of the old mad King George (III, of England)… and a fun time was had by all.
Maybe our mad King George should have invited the new right-wing leader of France – to see if he is willing to send in a couple of hundred thousand French Hessian troops to bail out MKG from his failed imperial occupation of Eye-rack… After all, the USA bailed out the French in Indochina after the siege of Dien Bin Pho (sic) in 1954 and took over the support of the French puppet South Vietnamese regime. This French leader claims to love and support America; I wonder if this support goes as far as moving into a couple of nice Middle-eastern quagmires?
May 7th, 2007 at 6:29 pmAnybody else notice that Harry Reid’s not on the list?
May 7th, 2007 at 6:29 pmI am so disappointed to see David Gregory there. But, lately he has become another Bush poodle so I am not surprised.
I wonder why they didn’t invite Helen Thomas?
May 7th, 2007 at 6:31 pmActually I read it…try and keep up.
Comment by John M
Then why did you say you’d never heard her described that way?
May 7th, 2007 at 6:32 pmI think you have a hard time being wrong.
Why no Harry Reid, and why David Drier???
May 7th, 2007 at 6:32 pm“Who invited Gregory? He should be disinvited for his traitorous views.”
Traitorous = “not like PeePee’s views at /all/.”
May 7th, 2007 at 6:33 pmOr Mark Cuban.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:33 pmI was really surprised not to see Sanjaya’s name on the list.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:34 pmQueen Elizabeth should be ashamed of herself for having dinner with a bunch of thieves, cowards, traitors and liars.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:36 pmBecause of aristocracy and bloodlines, The Queen has afforded much more respect to Bush than she ever gave to Clinton. Clinton was, after all, a commoner. The tired old monarch gets what she deserves – a lazy-minded, mediocre product of American aristocracy who wouldn’t be able to match minds with Clinton for a New York minute.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:36 pm#7 spudge boy
May 7th, 2007 at 6:37 pmThanks – I did not know that — it’s another example of how skilled they are at manipulating the news stories of the day.
Hate is not strong enough to describe how I feel about Bush&Co.
“Why no Harry Reid, and why David Drier???”
Evidently, sons of prostitutes aren’t invited, but closeted, self-loathing queers are.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:38 pmAnd that has no bearing on his piss poor choice to follow the worst president in the history of the U.S.A.
When it all boils down he’s just another dumb jock not worthy of carrying Tillman’s jockstrap.
Comment by hellinabucket
Dumb jock just because he is a Bush supporter? I bet if he didn’t like Bush you would be praising how smart he is.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:38 pm“Because, the person she argues with most Elizabeth Hasselbeck was on the list…please try and keep up.
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 6:21 pm”
I wasn’t aware. Probably because I have a job. One that, in fact, prevents me from watching that show. And even if I didn’t have a job, apparently, like you, I still wouldn’t watch the show. But, by all means, watch that irrelevent show and I’ll continue to raise your children with science, math, history and critical thinking skills…
May 7th, 2007 at 6:39 pmDavid Gregory has gone to the dark side. His lovely chorus line audition behind Karl Rove’s rapping spectacle sealed the deal. Our intrepid Little Press Corps Lapdog is yapping and wriggling around on Cheney’s lap, even as we speak. Journalistic integrity? Forget it! He gets to see the Queen!!!!
May 7th, 2007 at 6:39 pmActually I read it…try and keep up.
Comment by John M
Then why did you say you’d never heard her described that way?
I think you have a hard time being wrong.
Comment by Zooey
I said I have never heard it and you posted it. I read in my head (maybe you have to read out loud) so I have never heard her desribed that way.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:40 pmWhat no Hannity, No O’Flafel-O’Reily, Savage, Glenn Beck, Malkin etc.
Just a bunch of free-loaders gorging themselves at taxpayers’ expense. I hope they all choke on it.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:41 pmRichard Wolffe is fairly critical of Bush&Co. David Gregory has had his moments – sometimes he’s on their case, sometimes he’s dancing with them.
Hasselbeck – the gratuitous guest – she will report back to the “gals” on the gossip — all favorable to the Stepford wife, and the cretin she’s married to.
Do you think Bush will actually chew with his mouth closed tonight?
Will he slap “Queenie” on the back?
Oh to be a fly on the wall and watch the monkey perform.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:42 pmI wasn’t aware. Probably because I have a job. One that, in fact, prevents me from watching that show. And even if I didn’t have a job, apparently, like you, I still wouldn’t watch the show. But, by all means, watch that irrelevent show and I’ll continue to raise your children with science, math, history and critical thinking skills…
Comment by unbelievable
I don’t watch the show, but have read a lot on the issue, because I find Rosie’s desperate cries for attention. I take it that you are a teacher from your post, I have also noticed that you post here very very often…I am glad to see our tax dollars at work.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:43 pmDoes any one really give a $hit-I hope Bush gives her a back rub.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:43 pmMr. and Mrs. Alberto Gonzales couldn’t make it, I see, guessing they’re busy at home with the flash cards, getting ready for Gonzo’s next trip up the hill on Thursday……
May 7th, 2007 at 6:43 pm….and Wolfowitz probably had a scheduling conflict between the missus and the mistrus….
“I wonder how Her Majesty will react when Bush puts his feet up on the table after dinner.
Comment by Republicans are the Fear and Smear Party — May 7, 2007 @ 6:28 pm”
LOL!
Let’s hope he stays sober and doesn’t go for the neck massage either…
May 7th, 2007 at 6:44 pm“Dumb jock just because he is a Bush supporter?”
Yes, that’s correct. At this point, you have to be either stupid or crazy to support Bush and his policies because they are so demonstratably failures.
I rooted for Manning even though I knew he was a Bush supporter. I just didn’t think it would be good for football to have a Superbowl in which Rex Grossman emerges victorious over Peyton Manning. Sorry, everyone.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:44 pmApparently Reid declined. Good for Harry!
May 7th, 2007 at 6:45 pmI said I have never heard it and you posted it. I read in my head (maybe you have to read out loud) so I have never heard her desribed that way.
Comment by John M
Ah. I see. Actually, I guess I “read” it.
You really do have a hard time being wrong, don’t you?
May 7th, 2007 at 6:45 pmHave you ever met Exley?
Did you even read what the fu*k I wrote. What the fu*k does it have to do with winning, being smart or working hard?
He is a tool for the Bush admin. Read what the fu*k I said and comment about it. Strawmen mean nothing.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:46 pmYes, that’s correct. At this point, you have to be either stupid or crazy to support Bush and his policies because they are so demonstratably failures.
I rooted for Manning even though I knew he was a Bush supporter. I just didn’t think it would be good for football to have a Superbowl in which Rex Grossman emerges victorious over Peyton Manning. Sorry, everyone.
Comment by Bluedog49
I’m not a Bush supporter myself, but to marginalize anybody that supports him in such a way (stupid or crazy) is ridiclulous.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:48 pmThe full menu for tonight’s dinner will be:
Spring Pea Soup with Fernleaf Lavender
Chive Pizzelle with American Cavier
Newton Chardonnay “Unfiltered” 2004
Dover Sole Almondine
Roasted Artichokes, Pequillo Peppers and Olives Saddle of Spring Lamb Chanterelle Sauce Fricasse of Baby Vegetables Peter Michael “Les Pavots” 2003 Argula, Savannah Mustard and Mint Romaine Chapmagne Dressing and Trio of Farmhouse Cheese “Rose Blossoms”
Schramsberg Brut Rose 2004
(wow, my first paste job…………cool………)
May 7th, 2007 at 6:49 pm“I don’t watch the show, but have read a lot on the issue,”
Same response as I gave you before…
” because I find Rosie’s desperate cries for attention. ”
So, you relate? Figures…
“I take it that you are a teacher from your post, I have also noticed that you post here very very often…I am glad to see our tax dollars at work.
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 6:43 pm”
I don’t post here during school hours, so your tax dollars have nothing to do with my posting time, which isn’t really all that much. In fact, I would guess YOUR tax dollars have nothing to do with anything anyway, since you can’t pay them if you don’t have a job, but loads of free time to read tabloids.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:50 pmOK, John then just for the sake of argument, if you were a Bush supporter, what would you list as his five greatest accomplishments for the people of the United States?
May 7th, 2007 at 6:51 pmAh. I see. Actually, I guess I “read†it.
You really do have a hard time being wrong, don’t you?
Have you ever met Exley?
Comment by Zooey
You do realize that I was responding to you saying that I have never heard that. You see when somebody says that after a statement they typically mean “before” your statement. Obviously you posted it, maybe you if I dumb it down for you a little. I have never heard anybody say that Rosie is smart as a whip before you posted that Rosie is smart as a whip. Does that help?
May 7th, 2007 at 6:52 pmMy 10 year old can debate better than that Hasslebeck chick. I’ve seen her, and it aint pretty. They do shred her though, that’s fun to watch.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:56 pmI don’t post here during school hours, so your tax dollars have nothing to do with my posting time, which isn’t really all that much. In fact, I would guess YOUR tax dollars have nothing to do with anything anyway, since you can’t pay them if you don’t have a job, but loads of free time to read tabloids.
Comment by unbelievable
Actually I am a CPA, and I know a little bit about taxes. I tavel often and do all my posting and reading of current events in airports or hotels. I don’t read tabloids, but I will read yahoo news or other places that explain the tension between Rosie and Hasselbeck. As a matter of fact, my wife is a teacher and she doesn’t have time to post on websites either as she is always grading papers or doing lesson plans. I do see that you post at the school, which is on a computer that my tax dollars paid for, hmmm?
May 7th, 2007 at 6:56 pmJohn: “to marginalize anybody that supports him in such a way (stupid or crazy) is ridiclulous.”
And yet, I maintain that at this point in his presidency, to support him is either crazy or stupid. Now, I may have a very broad definition of “crazy.” For, example, if you’re a self-loathing, authoritarian personality who must follow the leader in all circumstances, I’m going to call that crazy.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:56 pmOK, John then just for the sake of argument, if you were a Bush supporter, what would you list as his five greatest accomplishments for the people of the United States?
Comment by Bluedog49
If I were a Bush supporter? I already said that I am not, but I don’t believe that people that support him have to be stupid. Peyton Manning is a very bright individual, so your statement about Bush supporters is obviously wrong.
May 7th, 2007 at 6:58 pmYou do realize that I was responding to you saying that I have never heard that. You see when somebody says that after a statement they typically mean “before†your statement. Obviously you posted it, maybe you if I dumb it down for you a little. I have never heard anybody say that Rosie is smart as a whip before you posted that Rosie is smart as a whip. Does that help?
Comment by John M
I’ll tell you what I tell Exley — if it means that much to you to be right, you go ahead and be right. My ego isn’t so fragile that I can’t be wrong once in a while.
Bless your heart….
May 7th, 2007 at 6:58 pmAnd yet, I maintain that at this point in his presidency, to support him is either crazy or stupid. Now, I may have a very broad definition of “crazy.†For, example, if you’re a self-loathing, authoritarian personality who must follow the leader in all circumstances, I’m going to call that crazy.
Comment by Bluedog49
See that is different. It is one thing to say supporting him is stupid, but another to say that anybody that supports him is stupid. We have all done stupid things in our lives, does that make everybody stupid.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:00 pmJohn: “I do see that you post at the school, which is on a computer that my tax dollars paid for, hmmm?”
How do you see that?
May 7th, 2007 at 7:01 pmI’ll tell you what I tell Exley — if it means that much to you to be right, you go ahead and be right. My ego isn’t so fragile that I can’t be wrong once in a while.
Bless your heart….
Comment by Zooey
You started the pointless argument. Too bad you didn’t come equipped with the proper resources. By the way I am not Exley.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:01 pmDumb a dumb fu*k doesn’t have anything to do with IQ.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:03 pmI’m not a Bush supporter myself, but to marginalize anybody that supports him in such a way (stupid or crazy) is ridiclulous.
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 6:48 pm
You mean the way the Bush’s Administration and it’s minions has marginalized anyone that speaks out against his failed policies? Cry me a river. Boo hoo “They are marginalizing me because I support Bush” WAKE UP!!!!!! SUPPORTING BUSH IS RIDICULOUS! BUSH SHOULD BE MARGINALIZED, ROVE SHOULD BE MARGINALIZED, FOX NEWS SHOULD BE MARGINALIZED.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:03 pmNo, but you are acting like him.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:04 pmBy the way I am not Exley.
Comment by John M
I never said you were Exley. I know the difference between one pompous ass and another.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:04 pmJohn: “I do see that you post at the school, which is on a computer that my tax dollars paid for, hmmm?â€
How do you see that?
Comment by Bluedog49
Just a little bit of reading between the lines.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:06 pmJohn M.
…perhaps you could go get your Rosie fix on Nick at Nite, or wherever the hell you can find such television crap on the cable……
geeeeez
May 7th, 2007 at 7:06 pmWow.
John M is really weak.
And he sounds more like JMH.
Like I said -weak.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:08 pmJohn, how do you know Peyton Manning is not crazy? Do you know him?
My point is that if you can’t come up with any fact-based, quantitative reasons why you support a president who has been there for over 6 years, but you’re still a fervent supporter, you’re either crazy or stupid. Of course, John, I’ve been speaking figuratively and, as a CPA, you may have problems with that.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:08 pmJohn: “Just a little bit of reading between the lines.”
OK, so you’re a bullshitter. Thanks for confirming that.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:10 pm“Actually I am a CPA, ”
Oh, you’re THAT troll… LOL
“I tavel often and do all my posting and reading of current events in airports or hotels. I don’t read tabloids, but I will read yahoo news or other places that explain the tension between Rosie and Hasselbeck.”
HOW isn’t the point, it’s the fact that you bother to read about it AT ALL.
“As a matter of fact, my wife is a teacher and she doesn’t have time to post on websites either as she is always grading papers or doing lesson plans.”
Not my problem she can’t handle her work load at work. She should work smarter – not harder. My school just won a serious award for creativity and ingenuity in place of traditional teaching methods that don’t work so well. We’re project based, and at this time, last weeks of school, we’ve taught our students so well that they are functioning on their own without the need for spoon feeding. Plus, I can grade projects during my planning period. Comes from having worked in Corporate America under strict deadlines.
“I do see that you post at the school, which is on a computer that my tax dollars paid for, hmmm?
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 6:56 pm”
You’re flat out lying about that – so, prove it.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:10 pmI never said you were Exley. I know the difference between one pompous ass and another.
Comment by Zooey
What makes me a pompus ass? You started the argument with me and then tried to play a little game of semantics.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:11 pmOK, so you’re a bullshitter. Thanks for confirming that.
Comment by Bluedog49
In “John M World” everyone lives in the same time zone.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:12 pm“How do you see that?
Comment by Bluedog49 — May 7, 2007 @ 7:01 pm”
Projection… Because he does it, he assumes I must do it.
Must explain why his wife is always working at home… LOL
May 7th, 2007 at 7:13 pmJohn, how do you know Peyton Manning is not crazy? Do you know him?
My point is that if you can’t come up with any fact-based, quantitative reasons why you support a president who has been there for over 6 years, but you’re still a fervent supporter, you’re either crazy or stupid. Of course, John, I’ve been speaking figuratively and, as a CPA, you may have problems with that.
Comment by Bluedog49
Of course I don’t know him. However, he has been in the public eye for awhile and crazy or stupid has never been a way he has been described by people that know him, at least publically. You are right I can’t find many reasons to support Bush, which is why I don’t. However, other people have their own reasons…you should ask them.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:13 pmIs there any chance that the guests will be washing down their dinner with nice tall glasses of Koo-aid?
May 7th, 2007 at 7:14 pmOoohh Yaaaah!
“Just a little bit of reading between the lines.
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 7:06 pm”
Then you’re also stupid. It’s 7:00 at night. School, for me, is over at 2:30.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:15 pmIt would be cool to go to the dinner I guess . . . I mean, if you support the 28 percent approval president whose brain cells are clogged with malted hops and bong resin, then why not?
I’d like to be there long enough to . . . . throw my food !
May 7th, 2007 at 7:15 pmWhat makes me a pompus ass? You started the argument with me and then tried to play a little game of semantics.
Comment by John M
Who’s playing semantics?
Exhibit A:
I said I have never heard it and you posted it. I read in my head (maybe you have to read out loud) so I have never heard her desribed that way.
Comment by John M
Just try to let it go. I already said you could be right.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:16 pmYou’re flat out lying about that – so, prove it.
Comment by unbelievable
I can’t prove it, but I have seen when you post and when schools typically get out while taking into account different time zones. Unless you leave right when the bell rings, which I know that no teacher does, being married to one, you are posting at school.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:17 pmExhibit A:
I said I have never heard it and you posted it. I read in my head (maybe you have to read out loud) so I have never heard her desribed that way.
Comment by John M
Just try to let it go. I already said you could be right.
Comment by Zooey
Exactly, I was coming back after your “You just did. I’M describing her that way”.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:19 pmUnbe,
Just tell John M he’s right. I think he’s been watching you, btw.
**eyes rolling**
:-D
May 7th, 2007 at 7:19 pmThen you’re also stupid. It’s 7:00 at night. School, for me, is over at 2:30.
Comment by unbelievable
And I have seen your posts here much earlier.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:19 pmProjection… Because he does it, he assumes I must do it.
Must explain why his wife is always working at home… LOL
Comment by unbelievable
I do all my postings in travel or in hotels. Never on the clock.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:20 pmSomeone please explain to me why football players, interior designers, TV Personalities, etc., would be invited to a State Dinner in the honor of Queen Elizabeth? I can see the jockey that won the derby because Elizabeth is avidly into horses, but why were the rest of them invited? If it’s a State Dinner, shouldn’t the invitation list have been nothing but Diplomats (and the jockey)?
May 7th, 2007 at 7:21 pmExactly, I was coming back after your “You just did. I’M describing her that wayâ€.
Comment by John M
My statement contains no sementic games whatsoever, Mr I-Gotta-Be-Right-No-Matter-What.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:21 pm“I can’t prove it”
Exactly! Because it’s not true.
“but I have seen when you post and when schools typically get out while taking into account different time zones.”
I generally don’t start posting until 5:30 – three hours AFTER I’m done for the day. You REALLY are stupid – that’s basic math. Shouldn’t a CPA know basic math? LOL
“Unless you leave right when the bell rings, which I know that no teacher does, being married to one, you are posting at school.
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 7:17 pm”
Well, since I’ve proven you to be stupid, AND bad at math, let me add that you’re pathetic.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:22 pmMy statement contains no sementic games whatsoever, Mr I-Gotta-Be-Right-No-Matter-What.
Comment by Zooey
I have no problem admitting I was wrong…if in fact I was wrong.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:22 pmI generally don’t start posting until 5:30 – three hours AFTER I’m done for the day. You REALLY are stupid – that’s basic math. Shouldn’t a CPA know basic math? LOL
Comment by unbelievable
Generally? So I guess you just cheat tax payers some of the time?
May 7th, 2007 at 7:24 pm“Just tell John M he’s right. I think he’s been watching you, btw.
**eyes rolling**
:-D
Comment by Zooey — May 7, 2007 @ 7:19 pm”
I will if you will ;D
More proof that he’s not employed – he claims to know what times we all post… LOL
May 7th, 2007 at 7:24 pmGood night all, have fun. Unbelievable…don’t forget to grade those papers that you didn’t do because you were posting here on a school computer.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:26 pmI have no problem admitting I was wrong…if in fact I was wrong.
Comment by John M
You’re hilarious.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:26 pmOMG!
He’s not even a troll.
He’s just stupid.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:26 pmMore proof that he’s not employed – he claims to know what times we all post… LOL
Comment by unbelievable
It just takes a little bit of back reading. I feel confident in our future with you at the helm.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:26 pm“And I have seen your posts here much earlier.
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 7:19 pm”
On Saturdays or Sundays, during Spring Break, Winter Break, government holidays, or personal days off. Otherwise, I’m too busy at school to keep up with my school email, much less here. If your wife really were a teacher, you’d know that.
But again, you have no proof or you’d have given it.
You’re now dismissed. Go read about Paris Hilton’s latest antics…
May 7th, 2007 at 7:28 pmI will if you will ;D
More proof that he’s not employed – he claims to know what times we all post… LOL
Comment by unbelievable
I did! In #70. But he ain’t takin’ it lying down. Heh.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:29 pmJohn M is obviously a cyber-stalker.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:29 pmOMG!
He’s not even a troll.
He’s just stupid.
Comment by trueblue
A lurker stalker troll, at that. :P
May 7th, 2007 at 7:29 pmDamn, this new troll is certainly a whiny bitch isn’t he? I haven’t seen such a childish display of “I know you are but what am I” since my kids were in first grade.
Anyone at this point who supports Boy George is either stupid, a religious freak, or a stubborn idiot who won’t admit a mistake. John M. says he isn’t a Bush supporter. I am calling bullshit on that.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:30 pm“I do all my postings in travel or in hotels. Never on the clock.
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 7:20 pm”
Liar. You wouldn’t have accused me unless you had a guilty conscious.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:30 pmAnd remember, he’s definitely NOT a Bush supporter… Something tells me we’re going to find more and more trolls who object to our lines of reasoning but definitely are NOT Bush supporters.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:33 pm“Generally? So I guess you just cheat tax payers some of the time?
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 7:24 pm”
Shouldn’t a CPA know about averages?
Sometimes I post at 5:00 – other times, later than 5:30 – making it (5:30) a mid-point. Wow – you really have a guilty-conscious, don’t you?
I bet you also steal stuff from your employers. Is that why you’re unemployed now?
May 7th, 2007 at 7:33 pmI am calling bullshit on that.
Comment by nanlichi
I join you in that call.
John M also obviously has a problem with uppity women. :)
May 7th, 2007 at 7:34 pmunbelievable: “Liar. You wouldn’t have accused me unless you had a guilty conscious.”
Exactly. Kind of like:
“I know what you were doing last night!” Ted Haggard
May 7th, 2007 at 7:35 pm“don’t forget to grade those papers that you didn’t do because you were posting here on a school computer.
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 7:26 pm”
Do you not know what a PROJECT is either? Stupid idiot… Sheesh.
Well, at least he finally realized that running away was all he had left. Freak
May 7th, 2007 at 7:35 pmI hope ms. pelosi spits up her rice. Not because she is ok but it may go in the presidents face.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:36 pm“It just takes a little bit of back reading. I feel confident in our future with you at the helm.
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 7:26 pm”
You mean lying.
Well, at least one of us is raising your children while you lie on the sofa in your crusty bathrobe watching Jerry Springer while your wife scrubs toilets for a living…
Shoo already.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:37 pmMaybe he can eat with his mouth full, swear and then give the Queen a shoulder rub, that would be great for starters
Hating the Repukian Mafia daily
May 7th, 2007 at 7:38 pm#119 – Unbe
Ugh. Did you have to give me a visual of a “crusty” bathrobe? :P
May 7th, 2007 at 7:39 pm“I did! In #70. But he ain’t takin’ it lying down. Heh.
Comment by Zooey — May 7, 2007 @ 7:29 pm”
I think he wants a lot more than that! LOL :D
May 7th, 2007 at 7:40 pm“Exactly. Kind of like:
“I know what you were doing last night!†Ted Haggard
Comment by Bluedog49 — May 7, 2007 @ 7:35 pm”
LOL!
May 7th, 2007 at 7:41 pm“Ugh. Did you have to give me a visual of a “crusty†bathrobe? :P
Comment by Zooey — May 7, 2007 @ 7:39 pm”
Why else do you think he’s so ornery? LOL
May 7th, 2007 at 7:42 pmSpudge,
Bush met the 2005 Super Bowl Champion New England Patriots in April 2005.
He met the 2006 Super Bowl Champ Steelers in June 2006.
He met the 2004 Super Bowl Champ New England Patriots in May 2004.
He met the 2002 Super Bowl Champ Patriots in April 2002.
These visits by Super Bowl Champions (as well as World Series champs, NCAA champs, etc.) to the White House usually happen several months after the game.
Your theory that this years visit by the Colts on April 23 was somehow delayed just to take attention away from Kevin Tillman’s testimony on April 24 is not supported by the facts and is just plain silly.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:43 pmJohn M. basically admitted he’s been around long enough to notice Unbelievable’s posting patterns. Which tells me he’s nothing new around here. Same troll, different name.
Nice try to make it appear there really are a number of intelligent folks who back this administration. Because there is not.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:48 pm#84, Zooey,
I prefer the word “arrogant.”
May 7th, 2007 at 7:48 pmThere’s a reason why Exley can’t get some booty.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:51 pmI prefer the word “arrogant.â€
Comment by Exley
I know you do, babes, but it ain’t always about you, is it?
May 7th, 2007 at 7:51 pm#129,
Sadly, no.
May 7th, 2007 at 7:55 pmSadly, no.
Comment by Exley
Heh.
May 7th, 2007 at 8:02 pm#126
May 7th, 2007 at 8:05 pmI caught that also, For Truth………….
John M. IS liberlism = mental disorder.
He changed his screen name after we decided not to throw insults back and forth.
Oh and Exley, I will bet those other champs visits fell on specific dates also.
May 7th, 2007 at 8:16 pmKissinger can tell the Queen all about the time he and Nixon helped Pinochet torture and kill people…
May 7th, 2007 at 9:07 pmComment by John M #11
Hey John,
…that may be in inbred Bushite DUHmerikkka…
…but where it counts…
…here in “THINKING America”…
…fu*k you and Payton too!
…ANYBODY in this world who supports Bushiva…
…is a TRAITOR and murderous criminal…
…and ANYBODY who supports (agrees with or LIKES) ANYBODY who supports Bushiva…
…is likewise…
…so John that probably means YOU!
May 7th, 2007 at 9:34 pm#67 – Raven,
May 7th, 2007 at 9:46 pmThe Queen could have found better fare at Outback’s and had a Bloomin’ Onion to boot. That is what happens when a burger flipper from MacD’s steps in as a state menu planner.
Because of aristocracy and bloodlines, The Queen has afforded much more respect to Bush than she ever gave to Clinton. Clinton was, after all, a commoner. The tired old monarch gets what she deserves – a lazy-minded, mediocre product of American aristocracy who wouldn’t be able to match minds with Clinton for a New York minute.
Comment by Bluedog49 — May 7, 2007 @ 6:36 pm
Isn’t the Queen’s family descended from Germans? Well then you can see the connection to the Hitler supporting Bush family.
May 7th, 2007 at 9:54 pmIsn’t the Queen’s family descended from Germans? Well then you can see the connection to the Hitler supporting Bush family.
Comment by Shane #137
Hapsburgs, Tudors, Bushs…
…they’re ALL inbreds…
May 7th, 2007 at 10:04 pmOf course I don’t know him. However, he has been in the public eye for awhile and crazy or stupid has never been a way he has been described by people that know him, at least publically. You are right I can’t find many reasons to support Bush, which is why I don’t. However, other people have their own reasons…you should ask them.
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 7:13 pm
Hypocrite. Rosie O’Donnell has been in the public eye over 20 years and nobody every had anything bad to say about her until she started criticizing George Bush.
Elizabeth was on the view and ratings were in the toilet. O’Donnell came on and ratings went up 30 Nielsen points. ABC wanted to sign a 3 year contract and O’Donnell didn’t want to commit. She has already been negotiating her own show. She is a humanitarian that does incredible work for children.
Elizabeth was on the show Survivor and then came to the View. Impressive resume in show biz. Not. Of course you’ve never seen the show but YOU feel free to pass judgment on O’Donnell while you’re complaining about others passing judgment of Manning.
Your a CPA and I’m the producer of the View so why down’t you fa cough.
May 7th, 2007 at 10:11 pm#139 – Shane
Well done, Mizz Shane. :)
Way to get around the f*ck filter!
May 7th, 2007 at 10:16 pmWell, since I’ve proven you to be stupid, AND bad at math, let me add that you’re pathetic.
Comment by unbelievable — May 7, 2007 @ 7:22 pm
And he claims to be a CPA and then “reads between the lines”. Counterintuitive isn’t it?
May 7th, 2007 at 10:17 pmShane,
Moscow
May 7th, 2007 at 10:18 pmI bet you also steal stuff from your employers. Is that why you’re unemployed now?
Comment by unbelievable — May 7, 2007 @ 7:33 pm
My guess is postage and paper clips since he no doubt works in the mail room.
May 7th, 2007 at 10:20 pmWay to get around the f*ck filter!
Comment by Zooey — May 7, 2007 @ 10:16 pm
Cursing is my specialty! :^P
May 7th, 2007 at 10:24 pmCursing is my specialty! :^P
Comment by Shane
We must learn from one another….
May 7th, 2007 at 10:40 pmWhaaaa?
May 7th, 2007 at 10:43 pmNo Colbert?
Un, I didn’t read the thread at all, and what do enquiring minds come up with???
May 7th, 2007 at 10:45 pmWhaaaa?
No Colbert?
Comment by RUCerious — May 7, 2007 @ 10:43 pm
Are you kidding. Colbert scares them. Even Jake doesn’t like Colbert.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:03 pm#47 “Dumb jock just because he is a Bush supporter? I bet if he didn’t like Bush you would be praising how smart he is.”
Well, considering he is a dumb jock he likes Bush. If he were smart he wouldn’t so…yes, dumb jock fits.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:06 pm#84 “What makes me a pompus ass? You started the argument with me and then tried to play a little game of semantics”
Are you kidding, Jakey? You tried to play the semantic game with Zooey with that garbage about not hearing it versus not reading it.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:11 pmWe think they all suck shit! cheerio!
May 7th, 2007 at 11:13 pmJohn M., you are not a Bush supporter but you defend Bush at every turn? You sound like every other troll. Please tell me you are a “registered independent”. You do know that means you are free to criticize without actually having to take a stand on anything? Yeah, you do, that is why you say it even though you are a die-hard neo-con loser.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:18 pmBy the way, all, I heard an interview with Matt Hasselbeck. He said ole Liz was a follower that took her views from those around her. She has no views of her own.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:20 pmMy Jakey comment was wrong. I am guessing John M. stands for John MICHAEL.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:21 pmI haven’t read all the post’s yet so forgive if I repeat what some one else may have mentioned…Me think’s this is just for pappy show..Ya know, I can do anything better than you..Pappy had the queen over for dinner also..Blessings…I woud like to be a mouse in the corner to listen to Pearlman and Domingo though.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:22 pmMy Jakey comment was wrong. I am guessing John M. stands for John MICHAEL.
Comment by JPark
Oh please, no one is as stupid as michael. :-)
May 7th, 2007 at 11:25 pmPappy had the queen over for dinner also..Blessings…I woud like to be a mouse in the corner to listen to Pearlman and Domingo though.
Comment by Sharon
Now all Chimpy needs to do is puke on the Premier of Japan — twice. :P
May 7th, 2007 at 11:26 pm#156 Except Mikey.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:29 pmFor the record, I can use Google — I don’t have to stalk anyone — just a smalll sampling from about 3,030 comments by “unbelievable” at ThinkProgress.org PRIOR to 5:30 pm:
May 16, 2006 @ 4:12 pm
May 7th, 2007 at 11:30 pmJanuary 20, 2006 @ 10:47 am
January 15, 2006 @ 10:17 am
December 22, 2005 @ 10:34 am
April 30, 2006 @ 11:34 am
April 17, 2006 @ 4:03 pm
June 29, 2006 @ 5:20 pm
February 27, 2006 @ 4:04 pm
January 31, 2007 @ 3:28 pm
May 11, 2006 @ 4:14 pm
October 30, 2006 @ 4:55 pm
October 23, 2006 @ 12:07 pm
April 3, 2007 @ 3:30 pm
October 21, 2006 @ 10:59 am
September 9, 2006 @ 4:08 pm
March 31, 2007 @ 11:19 am
April 8, 2007 @ 12:18 pm
February 4, 2007 @ 11:34 am
February 13, 2007 @ 5:25 pm
March 1, 2006 @ 9:16 am
March 26, 2006 @ 11:00 am
August 9, 2006 @ 4:30 pm
May 12, 2006 @ 1:11 pm
January 19, 2006 @ 3:36 pm
April 7, 2007 @ 1:01 pm
March 10, 2007 @ 10:57 am
March 31, 2006 @ 2:35 pm
October 30, 2006 @ 4:45 pm
June 29, 2006 @ 12:43 pm
April 6, 2006 @ 12:06 pm
April 20, 2006 @ 4:09 pm
May 7, 2007 @ 1:06 pm (I guess today wasn’t a “school day” either)
December 10, 2006 @ 12:33 pm
July 11, 2006 @ 3:05 pm
June 28, 2006 @ 5:22 pm
March 28, 2007 @ 11:09 am
July 15, 2006 @ 11:23 am
May 3, 2006 @ 3:34 pm
March 26, 2007 @ 4:29 pm
#158 He is unique. Ugh.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:31 pmJohn M. You need to chill out, stalker-boy.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:37 pm#160 Kinda like Lou Gehrig’s disease is unique.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:37 pmComment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 11:30 pm
That is frickin’ creepy, John Boy.
Are you going to get her school calendar, too? You know, you might want to compare them. Maybe she’ll tell if she had sick days, or snow days.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:41 pmBy the way, all, I heard an interview with Matt Hasselbeck. He said ole Liz was a follower that took her views from those around her. She has no views of her own.
Comment by JPark — May 7, 2007 @ 11:20 pm
Oh my, I would have loved to have seen that.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:44 pmJohnny M, I’m a teacher and a programmer, I post when I want to.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:45 pmLook me up asshat.
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 11:30 pm
Gee John Moron. I post from work all the time, you want to call my boss.
Do I really HAVE to tell you where to shove that list, stalker?
May 7th, 2007 at 11:46 pmNow all Chimpy needs to do is puke on the Premier of Japan — twice. :P
Comment by Zooey — May 7, 2007 @ 11:26 pm
I’m sure he’ll at least pass gas, as usual.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:48 pmI’m sure he’ll at least pass gas, as usual.
Comment by Shane
Heh, heh. Pull mah finger….heh, heh.
May 7th, 2007 at 11:50 pmShane ~ then joke about the wmd he just unleashed…
May 7th, 2007 at 11:52 pmthis is a test
May 8th, 2007 at 12:14 am#164 It was a local interview, I think. I heard it on the radio.
May 8th, 2007 at 12:17 amYou passed, Britisher.
May 8th, 2007 at 12:17 amI’m not a Bush supporter myself, but to marginalize anybody that supports him in such a way (stupid or crazy) is ridiclulous.
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 6:48 pm
John M: Stupid and Crazy. The kind of troll who wants to win every argument. Your old lady is grading papers to keep from dealing with your dumbass.
May 8th, 2007 at 12:23 amGood evening Lady Z, Shane, RUCerious amd Unbelievable,…Finelly read all the post’s…Been realy busy and tired today..Beautiful weather here…
Love all your post’s.Look’s like we have another black hearted stalker troll, sound’s a lot like the other 2 that lurke here with diffrent screen name’s..Must be one sick person with split personalaties and off their med’s…Oh well you all have it under control and it’s past my bed time, 5 A.M. these day’s make’s for a long day….Blessings all…
May 8th, 2007 at 12:25 amGood to see you, Great Lady.
May 8th, 2007 at 12:31 amNighty nite Sharon!
May 8th, 2007 at 12:37 am“I do see that you post at the school, which is on a computer that my tax dollars paid for, hmmm?
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 6:56 pmâ€
You’re flat out lying about that – so, prove it.
Comment by unbelievable — May 7, 2007 @ 7:10 pm
Jeez, one person asks for proof, he uses google to find it and others call him creepy and accuse him of stalking. What’s up with that?
May 8th, 2007 at 1:18 amgrn, or John M. How the he!! did he use google to find out if she was at work. YOU are creepy.
May 8th, 2007 at 1:30 amgrn, or John M. How the he!! did he use google to find out if she was at work. YOU are creepy.
Comment by JPark — May 8, 2007 @ 1:30 am
I don’t think he knows. He just posted a variety of times. Maybe they were all Sundays, holidays etc. I didn’t check. I just wondered why ask for proof and then ignore it and call him a stalker. Unless there is more to this, I didn’t see anything to make him seem like a stalker. And it’s real nice of you to attack me as well for just asking a question.
May 8th, 2007 at 1:44 amYou are defending an obvious troll. Why wouldn’t I attack you for asking an obviously loaded “question”?
May 8th, 2007 at 1:54 amI haven’t looked to see if those were all weekends. Have you, grn? No, you admitted you hadn’t. You just, out of the kindness of your heart defend a stalking piece of sh!t. Good job.
May 8th, 2007 at 1:56 amThe best comment I heard about the white tie dinner was on MSNBC. GW didn’t want to wear tails, but Condi (not the Mrs, mind you) talked him into it!
May 8th, 2007 at 2:23 amCondi and Bush, “joined at the frontal lobe.” I think their frontal lobes are south of their bellybuttons. And Condi says “she just can’t say ‘no’ to that man.” I don’t have the slightest bit of admiration for Laura, but she has to make a choice: move outta there or chase Condi down Pennsylvania Avenue with a baseball bat.
May 8th, 2007 at 7:54 amI haven’t looked to see if those were all weekends. Have you, grn? No, you admitted you hadn’t. You just, out of the kindness of your heart defend a stalking piece of sh!t. Good job.
Comment by JPark — May 8, 2007 @ 1:56 am
That was kind of my point. If you think he is wrong, why don’t you check the dates to see if they are weekends. Then he has no valid argument. And thanks for the nice welcome JPark. Do you always jump all over people the first time you address them? I hope there are nicer people on this site.
May 8th, 2007 at 8:12 amthere are nicer, and there are worser…
May 8th, 2007 at 8:45 amsome can speak proper, some caint…
some are little more than a cursor…
but lots are better than any saint
Elisabitch is a Bush tool. She lies on a daily basis. She even said the “surge was working.” I’m sure she gets her WH talking points everyday like the rest of the Bushbots. Why didn’t he invite some of the famlies of the fallen soldiers?
May 8th, 2007 at 9:17 amFor the record, I can use Google — I don’t have to stalk anyone — just a smalll sampling from about 3,030 comments by “unbelievable†at ThinkProgress.org PRIOR to 5:30 pm:
May 16, 2006 @ 4:12 pm
January 20, 2006 @ 10:47 am
January 15, 2006 @ 10:17 am
December 22, 2005 @ 10:34 am
April 30, 2006 @ 11:34 am
April 17, 2006 @ 4:03 pm
June 29, 2006 @ 5:20 pm
February 27, 2006 @ 4:04 pm
January 31, 2007 @ 3:28 pm
May 11, 2006 @ 4:14 pm
October 30, 2006 @ 4:55 pm
October 23, 2006 @ 12:07 pm
April 3, 2007 @ 3:30 pm
October 21, 2006 @ 10:59 am
September 9, 2006 @ 4:08 pm
March 31, 2007 @ 11:19 am
April 8, 2007 @ 12:18 pm
February 4, 2007 @ 11:34 am
February 13, 2007 @ 5:25 pm
March 1, 2006 @ 9:16 am
March 26, 2006 @ 11:00 am
August 9, 2006 @ 4:30 pm
May 12, 2006 @ 1:11 pm
January 19, 2006 @ 3:36 pm
April 7, 2007 @ 1:01 pm
March 10, 2007 @ 10:57 am
March 31, 2006 @ 2:35 pm
October 30, 2006 @ 4:45 pm
June 29, 2006 @ 12:43 pm
April 6, 2006 @ 12:06 pm
April 20, 2006 @ 4:09 pm
May 7, 2007 @ 1:06 pm (I guess today wasn’t a “school day†either)
December 10, 2006 @ 12:33 pm
July 11, 2006 @ 3:05 pm
June 28, 2006 @ 5:22 pm
March 28, 2007 @ 11:09 am
July 15, 2006 @ 11:23 am
May 3, 2006 @ 3:34 pm
March 26, 2007 @ 4:29 pm
Comment by John M
I did not post this. My last post was #106. Somebody is name-jacking.
May 8th, 2007 at 10:08 amThat is frickin’ creepy, John Boy.
Are you going to get her school calendar, too? You know, you might want to compare them. Maybe she’ll tell if she had sick days, or snow days.
Comment by Zooey
As I said before, I did not post the “list”, however it is interesting. Especially the one from yesterday. I guess we can just admit that unbelievable was lying about not posting during school hours.
May 8th, 2007 at 10:12 amI question Mannings judgement regarding Bush, there’s no reason someone who is informed should support the criminal Bush admin
May 8th, 2007 at 3:01 pm“May 16, 2006 @ 4:12 pm”
Again – I get off work at 2:30.
“January 20, 2006 @ 10:47 am”
Saturday – no school
“January 15, 2006 @ 10:17 am”
MLK Holiday
“December 22, 2005 @ 10:34 am”
Winter Break – no school.
“April 30, 2006 @ 11:34 am”
Personal Day (I had two I had to take or lose)
“April 17, 2006 @ 4:03 pm”
Again – I get off work at 2:30.
“June 29, 2006 @ 5:20 pm”
Summer Break – no school
“February 27, 2006 @ 4:04 pm”
Again – I get off work at 2:30.
“January 31, 2007 @ 3:28 pm
May 11, 2006 @ 4:14 pm
October 30, 2006 @ 4:55 pm”
Again – I get off work at 2:30.
“October 23, 2006 @ 12:07 pm”
Fall Break (we’re a 10 month school, so we get more breaks).
“April 3, 2007 @ 3:30 pm”
Again – I get off work at 2:30.
“October 21, 2006 @ 10:59 am”
Fall Break (we’re a 10 month school, so we get more breaks).
“September 9, 2006 @ 4:08 pm”
Again – I get off work at 2:30.
“March 31, 2007 @ 11:19 am”
Saturday – no school
“April 8, 2007 @ 12:18 pm”
Sunday – no school
“February 4, 2007 @ 11:34 am”
Sunday – no school
“February 13, 2007 @ 5:25 pm”
After 2:30
“March 26, 2006 @ 11:00 am”
Spring Break
“August 9, 2006 @ 4:30 pm”
Summer
“May 12, 2006 @ 1:11 pm”
Last year? Must’ve been a weekend or workday
“January 19, 2006 @ 3:36 pm”
MLK
“April 7, 2007 @ 1:01 pm”
Spring Break
“March 10, 2007 @ 10:57 am”
Weekend
“March 31, 2006 @ 2:35 pm”
After 2:30
“October 30, 2006 @ 4:45 pm”
After 2:30
“June 29, 2006 @ 12:43 pm”
Summer
“April 6, 2006 @ 12:06 pm”
Spring Break
“April 20, 2006 @ 4:09 pm”
After 2:30
“May 7, 2007 @ 1:06 pm (I guess today wasn’t a “school day†either)”
That’s a lie.
“December 10, 2006 @ 12:33 pm”
Sunday
“July 11, 2006 @ 3:05 pm
June 28, 2006 @ 5:22 pm”
Summer
“March 28, 2007 @ 11:09 am”
Spring Break
“July 15, 2006 @ 11:23 am”
Summer
“May 3, 2006 @ 3:34 pm”
After 2:30
“March 26, 2007 @ 4:29 pm
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 11:30 pm”
After 2:30
NOT ONE of those was valid. Not one. Idiot.
If your wife were a teacher, you’d know about summers, weekends, and breaks off…
Keep proving you have no job. What a total waste of time!
May 8th, 2007 at 4:47 pm“I guess we can just admit that unbelievable was lying about not posting during school hours.
Comment by John M — May 8, 2007 @ 10:12 am”
All someone posted was times – not actual proof that I posted then. They were ALL wrong. Not one was a valid school day or time.
I was in class at 1:10 yesterday, so that’s not me either. Either the person was lying, since they threw the 2007 dat into a list of 2006 dates, or some troll was hijacking my name.
The only liar here is you.
May 8th, 2007 at 4:50 pm“May 16, 2006 @ 4:12 pmâ€
Again – I get off work at 2:30.
“January 20, 2006 @ 10:47 amâ€
Saturday – no school
“January 15, 2006 @ 10:17 amâ€
MLK Holiday
“December 22, 2005 @ 10:34 amâ€
Winter Break – no school.
“April 30, 2006 @ 11:34 amâ€
Personal Day (I had two I had to take or lose)
“April 17, 2006 @ 4:03 pmâ€
Again – I get off work at 2:30.
“June 29, 2006 @ 5:20 pmâ€
Summer Break – no school
“February 27, 2006 @ 4:04 pmâ€
Again – I get off work at 2:30.
“January 31, 2007 @ 3:28 pm
May 11, 2006 @ 4:14 pm
October 30, 2006 @ 4:55 pmâ€
Again – I get off work at 2:30.
“October 23, 2006 @ 12:07 pmâ€
Fall Break (we’re a 10 month school, so we get more breaks).
May 8th, 2007 at 4:51 pm“April 3, 2007 @ 3:30 pmâ€
Again – I get off work at 2:30.
“October 21, 2006 @ 10:59 amâ€
Fall Break (we’re a 10 month school, so we get more breaks).
“September 9, 2006 @ 4:08 pmâ€
Again – I get off work at 2:30.
“March 31, 2007 @ 11:19 amâ€
Saturday – no school
“April 8, 2007 @ 12:18 pmâ€
Sunday – no school
“February 4, 2007 @ 11:34 amâ€
Sunday – no school
“February 13, 2007 @ 5:25 pmâ€
After 2:30
“March 26, 2006 @ 11:00 amâ€
Spring Break
“August 9, 2006 @ 4:30 pmâ€
Summer
“May 12, 2006 @ 1:11 pmâ€
Last year? Must’ve been a weekend or workday
May 8th, 2007 at 4:51 pm“January 19, 2006 @ 3:36 pmâ€
MLK
“April 7, 2007 @ 1:01 pmâ€
Spring Break
“March 10, 2007 @ 10:57 amâ€
Weekend
“March 31, 2006 @ 2:35 pmâ€
After 2:30
“October 30, 2006 @ 4:45 pmâ€
After 2:30
“June 29, 2006 @ 12:43 pmâ€
Summer
“April 6, 2006 @ 12:06 pmâ€
Spring Break
“April 20, 2006 @ 4:09 pmâ€
After 2:30
“May 7, 2007 @ 1:06 pm (I guess today wasn’t a “school day†either)â€
That’s a lie.
“December 10, 2006 @ 12:33 pmâ€
Sunday
“July 11, 2006 @ 3:05 pm
June 28, 2006 @ 5:22 pmâ€
Summer
“March 28, 2007 @ 11:09 amâ€
Spring Break
“July 15, 2006 @ 11:23 amâ€
Summer
“May 3, 2006 @ 3:34 pmâ€
After 2:30
“March 26, 2007 @ 4:29 pm
Comment by John M — May 7, 2007 @ 11:30 pmâ€
After 2:30
NOT ONE of those was valid. Not one. Idiot.
If your wife were a teacher, you’d know about summers, weekends, and breaks off…
Keep proving you have no job. What a total waste of time!
May 8th, 2007 at 4:52 pm“Whaaaa?
No Colbert?
Comment by RUCerious — May 7, 2007 @ 10:43 pm
Un, I didn’t read the thread at all, and what do enquiring minds come up with???
Comment by RUCerious — May 7, 2007 @ 10:45 pm”
Cool :)
May 8th, 2007 at 4:58 pm“And he claims to be a CPA and then “reads between the linesâ€. Counterintuitive isn’t it?
Comment by Shane — May 7, 2007 @ 10:17 pm”
Indeed!
He’s as much of a CPA as I am the Queen of England…
“My guess is postage and paper clips since he no doubt works in the mail room.
Comment by Shane — May 7, 2007 @ 10:20 pm”
LOL No doubt. Probably in the same building where MA (Valient Venus) cleans toilets…
May 8th, 2007 at 5:01 pmZoo, Spudge, Sharon, Shane, JPark:
Thanks for battling the dirt-bag troll.
I think that erroneous list came from the Denny/Sybil/just sayin’ cretin who has been assembling it for months to prove I am not a teacher (yeah, if I were gonna make up a career, I’d be Sandra Bullock or someone glamourous…). Desperate and pathetic! Sad.
May 8th, 2007 at 5:06 pmNOT ONE of those was valid. Not one. Idiot.
If your wife were a teacher, you’d know about summers, weekends, and breaks off…
Keep proving you have no job. What a total waste of time!
Comment by unbelievable
Again I did not post the list. Talk about a waste of time, you just went through each one. I did notice one that you said was after 2:30 (it was 2:35) you must really race home when the bell rings. You mention that you get off work at 2:30, no teacher leaves work right when school ends. Unless of course you are a substitute teacher, which is basically a babysitter.
May 8th, 2007 at 5:22 pm“Again I did not post the list. ”
I read your denial…
“Talk about a waste of time, you just went through each one.”
It took about 5 minutes because I have a calendar and a good memory. Compiling such a list must’ve taken hours.
“I did notice one that you said was after 2:30 (it was 2:35) you must really race home when the bell rings. You mention that you get off work at 2:30, no teacher leaves work right when school ends.”
Are you for real? You’re that pathetically desperate to be right? You must have made the list… You just convinced me.
Oh, another absolutist… “no teacher”.
The bell rings at 2:00. I am done at 2:30, because teachers stay after the kids. You should know that.
“Unless of course you are a substitute teacher, which is basically a babysitter.
Comment by John M — May 8, 2007 @ 5:22 pm”
I was a sub for a few months, trying to decide if I wanted to be a teacher or not (was an architect). I quickly got a job offer to teach Science because I took it more seriously than being a babysitter. There are alternative certification programs that allow this to happen in areas of high need.
This year I teach architecture at a public career academy. Most days I work late. But it’s the end of the year and because I’ve done my job well, my students are doing what they’ve been taught, lesson plans aren’t now necessary (5 days to go), and there’s nothing to grade until final projects are turned in next week. Plus, I’m not married to a pain-in-the-ass like you so that I need to fake working late and doing a lot of work at home like your wife.
You don’t know much about anything John… You really shouldn’t hang out here – it’ll get pointed out a lot.
May 8th, 2007 at 5:36 pm“Again I did not post the list. â€
I read your denial…
“Talk about a waste of time, you just went through each one.â€
It took about 5 minutes because I have a calendar and a good memory. Compiling such a list must’ve taken hours.
“I did notice one that you said was after 2:30 (it was 2:35) you must really race home when the bell rings. You mention that you get off work at 2:30, no teacher leaves work right when school ends.â€
Are you for real? You’re that pathetically desperate to be right? You must have made the list… You just convinced me.
Oh, another absolutist… “no teacherâ€.
The bell rings at 2:00. I am done at 2:30, because teachers stay after the kids. You should know that.
“Unless of course you are a substitute teacher, which is basically a babysitter.
Comment by John M — May 8, 2007 @ 5:22 pmâ€
I was a sub for a few months, trying to decide if I wanted to be a teacher or not (was an architect). I quickly got a job offer to teach Science because I took it more seriously than being a babysitter. There are alternative certification programs that allow this to happen in areas of high need.
This year I teach architecture at a public career academy. Most days I work late. But it’s the end of the year and because I’ve done my job well, my students are doing what they’ve been taught, lesson plans aren’t now necessary (5 days to go), and there’s nothing to grade until final projects are turned in next week. Plus, I’m not married to a pain-in-the-ass like you so that I need to fake working late and doing a lot of work at home like your wife.
You don’t know much about anything John… You really shouldn’t hang out here – it’ll get pointed out a lot.
Comment by unbelievable
I am now convinced you are not actually a teacher.
May 8th, 2007 at 6:12 pm“I am now convinced you are not actually a teacher.
Comment by John M — May 8, 2007 @ 6:12 pm”
Because if someone were going to lie, it would be about being a high school teacher? Underpaid, over-worked, and unappreciated public education teachers who aren’t valued by our community? LOL. Yeah, right. You are even more pathetic than first pointed out.
If I were going to lie, I’d say I was a laywer or NASA big shot or neurosurgeon or oh – a CPA. But, it’s just easier to tell the truth (because the lies about me just crumbled). Try it yourself sometime.
May 8th, 2007 at 6:48 pmBecause if someone were going to lie, it would be about being a high school teacher? Underpaid, over-worked, and unappreciated public education teachers who aren’t valued by our community? LOL. Yeah, right. You are even more pathetic than first pointed out.
If I were going to lie, I’d say I was a laywer or NASA big shot or neurosurgeon or oh – a CPA. But, it’s just easier to tell the truth (because the lies about me just crumbled). Try it yourself sometime.
Comment by unbelievable
I don’t know why you would lie about being a teacher. I don’t think that teachers are undervalued in our society. Why would somebody make up being a CPA. I think there are a few more exotic professions out there.
May 8th, 2007 at 6:59 pmover-worked
Comment by unbelievable
You get 2 months a year off(plus fall break, spring break, winter break) and you are home by 3:30 everyday. I don’t know if I would call you overworked.
May 8th, 2007 at 7:24 pmBeing the partner of a public school teacher, I have first hand knowledge enough to state that John M hasn’t a clue what he’s talking about, regarding whether teachers are overworked or not.
May 8th, 2007 at 7:42 pmHaving to deal with the dumbed down products of television and video game playing as a child care provider, (while both parents are working to make ends meet) is exhausting in and of itself.
I’m guessing John M is underemployed, has no children, and did just enough in school to get by.
And more than likely resented teachers trying to get him to think past basketball practice and the latest Play Station.
Say it ain’t so, Peyton. If it is then may you experience some “chop” tackles at the time of your release………………..bye, bye
May 8th, 2007 at 10:36 pmHey John M you’re a dick and you know it.
May 8th, 2007 at 10:43 pmJohn M is 007. Man of intrique. Jetting to far off lands, in search of…of…Enron money. He is the CPA of the Bush admin, making sure every Swiss account and Cayman Island deposit is all in place. John, Have you been to the Parguayan compound yet? So, in what locale have you made your sanctuary, fore you will need along with the other scum sucking vultures that have robbed or like you, have supported, therefore helped rob the nation of its, money, its history, its goodwill, its future, and its moral highground. Where will you hide, though it does not matter, we will invade any fugging country we care to in search of the slime shit like yourself.
May 9th, 2007 at 1:44 amSo keep looking over you shoulder dude, we are comming. And it aint gonna be pretty.
Would you like Nylon or hemp?
The Honorable Richard Cheney, Vice President of the United StatesOh, the irony…
May 9th, 2007 at 3:19 amBeing the partner of a public school teacher
Comment by Heyzeus — May 8, 2007 @ 7:42 pm
Alrighty then.
May 9th, 2007 at 8:31 amBeing the partner of a public school teacher, I have first hand knowledge enough to state that John M hasn’t a clue what he’s talking about, regarding whether teachers are overworked or not.
Having to deal with the dumbed down products of television and video game playing as a child care provider, (while both parents are working to make ends meet) is exhausting in and of itself.
I’m guessing John M is underemployed, has no children, and did just enough in school to get by.
And more than likely resented teachers trying to get him to think past basketball practice and the latest Play Station.
Comment by Heyzeus
Can you name any other career that gets as much time off as a public school teacher? I understand that it is a stressful job as my wife is a teacher. She is now teaching at a private school after teaching the last 8 years in public school. However, I also know that she is off of work much more often than I am. She works 45 hours or so a week, and then gets 3 months off a year! Then you include all the holidays that corporate America does not get off and teaching isn’t the tireless grind that people make it out to be. She knows that, and loves the fact that during the summer we don’t have to pay any daycare, because she is home with our kids, which is much more stressful than teaching.
May 9th, 2007 at 10:21 amNiven
I love your site. They really look very nice. The articles provided are long enough to provide great content but not so long as to be totally engrossing, if you know what I mean.
April 1st, 2008 at 2:49 am