POLL: 67 Percent Of Congressional GOP Say No Iraq Exit Even If War Hasn’t Improved By September
POLL: 67 Percent Of Congressional GOP Say No Iraq Exit Even If War Hasn’t Improved By September
House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) said this week, “By the time we get to September or October, members are going to want to know how well this is working, and if it isn’t, what’s Plan B.” His remarks were echoed by Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott (R-MS).
But a new National Journal “Congressional Insiders Poll,” which surveyed 124 members of Congress, finds that the September deadline may not mean much to war supporters.
Fully 67 percent of congressional Republicans say that even if conditions in Iraq have not improved significantly by September, Congress will still not pass legislation withdrawing U.S. forces out of Iraq. They give reasons such as, “Democrats will try, but fail,” and “No complete withdrawal can occur without Al Qaeda setting up a safe haven.”
Question: If the political and military situation in Iraq has not significantly improved by September, will Congress enact legislation to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq?
In contrast, 59 percent of congressional Democrats said they believe Congress will pass withdrawal legislation if conditions don’t improve.
Also, unlike their GOP counterparts, the Democratic members who say Congress will not pass withdrawal legislation say they feel this way because they don’t believe enough war supporters will buck President Bush — not because they oppose the idea of withdrawal.
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
77 Responses to “POLL: 67 Percent Of Congressional GOP Say No Iraq Exit Even If War Hasn’t Improved By September”
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
The reality is this - no matter what they do, no matter how many bombs, no matter how many troops - they’re not going to “win” this war. well, unless they just kill every single person defending their country from invasion.
Force and killing do not bring peace. period.
Some reading:
“Can America Bring Peace to the World?”
May 11th, 2007 at 4:31 pmhttp://www.populistamerica.com/ can_america_bring_peace_to_the_world
Republicans want to fight the Islamists and Democrats don’t. And this is news how?
May 11th, 2007 at 4:31 pm“Fully 67 percent of congressional Republicans say that even if conditions in Iraq have not improved significantly by September, Congress will still not pass legislation withdrawing U.S. forces out of Iraq.”
Yeah, their not retarded
May 11th, 2007 at 4:31 pm…and they’ll go Down, Down, Down in a burnin’ ring of fire…
May 11th, 2007 at 4:31 pmAnd Iraqi presidents say 2 more Years !!
“I think within one or two years, we will be able to recruit our forces and prepare our armed forces and tell goodbye to our friends,” he said
http://news.yahoo.com/ s/ ap/ 20070511/ ap_on_re_eu/ britain_iraq_talabani
May 11th, 2007 at 4:33 pmComment by stopthecons — May 11, 2007 @ 4:31 pm
You need to brush up on your political theory, start with Plato’s “Gorgias”, “Republic” and “Laws”, then read Aristotle’s “Nicomachean Ethics” and “Politics”. Get back to me and when your done for your next assignment
May 11th, 2007 at 4:33 pmI love the second ‘No’ quote.
It sounds so much like the concern trolls we hear from so often. It pretty much solidifies that those sorts are simply echoing the blind GOP section.
May 11th, 2007 at 4:39 pmRepublicans want to fight the Islamists and Democrats don’t. And this is news how?
Comment by Patrick1 — May 11, 2007 @ 4:31 pm
This is the truth right here. Republicans want to kill anyone who is Muslim, even us ex basketball players, while Democrats don’t want to fight a war against a religion. Hitler did the same against the Jews. he wanted to fight jewry while Democrats didn’t. Patrick1 has it right. Thanks Patrick1 for showing the colors of the facsist party.
May 11th, 2007 at 4:39 pm“Fully 67 percent of congressional Republicans say that even if conditions in Iraq have not improved significantly by September, Congress will still not pass legislation withdrawing U.S. forces out of Iraq.â€
Yeah, they and those who agree with them are retarded
Comment by Mr. President
Fixed your typo.
May 11th, 2007 at 4:40 pmComment by Mr. President
And how’s that little experiment in democracy-building-turned-theocracy-installation going? For someone supposedly so well-versed in history’s failures, I’m surprised you didn’t see this one coming.
May 11th, 2007 at 4:40 pmPatrickarmyofone wants to make straw man arguments, so he can show us how lame he truly is.
The truth is the righties, like patrickarmyofone, hate America and hate Democracy, all the while supporting the bush C.I.A., e.g. Corruption, Incompetence and Arrogance.
May 11th, 2007 at 4:42 pmheh,heh. thanks newty… BUSH/CHENEY ‘08
May 11th, 2007 at 4:42 pmPatrick1
You seem to tar all Muslims with same brush. Why?
May 11th, 2007 at 4:43 pmThe headline seems to me to be very misleading.
Congress, consisting of the House of Reps and the Senate has about 282 Republicans. Since the number of respondents was only 36, then this represents about 15% of congressional republicans or about 11% of republican Representatives. Of those 36, 67% would not favor a redeployment or withdrawal by September regardless of the situation on the ground.
Is my summary off or should you correct the headline for this article which appears to overstate the situation.
May 11th, 2007 at 4:43 pmComment by barfly — May 11, 2007 @ 4:40 pm
What are you rambling on about? barf-fly
May 11th, 2007 at 4:44 pmsee ya in ‘08 (R) loooooooooooozers, bet a few of ya cave in before then.
May 11th, 2007 at 4:45 pmhahahahahahahahaaa
#8 Do you like movies about gladiators?
May 11th, 2007 at 4:47 pmMy math was off above…the total of repugnants in the Senate is, what, 48 or 49 if you include Leiberman, and in the House, 202. Total 250. So my percents are off a bit….but the point holds, I think, that the headline should indicate that 67% of the 36 republicans interviewed are living in denial and will continue to be oblivious in the Fall.
May 11th, 2007 at 4:49 pmComment by angryvietnamvet — May 11, 2007 @ 4:43 pm
Look, this is reactionary, sensationalist blog. If you don’t like then you can giiit oouuut!
May 11th, 2007 at 4:50 pmThe Republicans’ Plan B in Iraq?
“By the time we get to September or October, members are going to want to know how well this is working, and if it isn’t, what’s Plan B.”
House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH), May 6, 2007.
“I have no Plan B.”
John McCain, on his support for the Iraq surge, April 13, 2007.
“Plan B was to make Plan A work.”
Joint Chiefs Chairman General Peter Pace, on Iraq, March 5, 2007.
“I don’t think you go to Plan B. You work with Plan A.”
May 11th, 2007 at 4:50 pmSecretary of State Rice, asked what the U.S. should do if the Iraqi government does not live up to its assurances, March 5, 2007.
We better start measuring the drapes for all the Democrats that will be moving into the Capitol Building and White House in 08. The US will prevail but the Republican party can not be resuscitated.
May 11th, 2007 at 4:52 pmYeah, their not retarded
Comment by Mr. President — May 11, 2007 @ 4:31 pm
And people who don’t know the difference between ‘their’ and ‘they’re’, well they’re pretty typical of your 28%’ers.
May 11th, 2007 at 4:54 pmNovember 2008 this will all get fixed.
May 11th, 2007 at 4:55 pmWhat are you rambling on about? barf-fly
Comment by Mr. President
Ohh! I’m wounded!
For one who styles himself as so well read, I’m surprised that you didn’t see the huge, looming political failure that Iraq represented. You must have skipped that particular history class …
May 11th, 2007 at 4:56 pmWhen you’re too friggin’ stupid to come up with a Plan B………..
May 11th, 2007 at 4:57 pmDo you like movies about gladiators?
Comment by Patrick1
Patrick loves cold-war era flicks. They boggle his scrotum.
Wolverines!
May 11th, 2007 at 4:58 pmSo this must mean that we need that oil pretty badly don’t you think?
May 11th, 2007 at 5:02 pmYou mean Boehner is LYING???
I’m shocked — SHOCKED, I tell ya!
/sarcasm
May 11th, 2007 at 5:02 pmUntil further notice, this is my response to most everything going on in this country. I love this country but fear my government :
OFF TOPIC : I just thought I’d share this with everyone. Should be mandatory reading for every US citizen :
http://www.911truth.org/ article.php?story=2007041283112370
May 11th, 2007 at 5:07 pmYou seem to tar all Muslims with same brush. Why?
Comment by UKBristolDave — May 11, 2007 @ 4:43 pm
Because they’re evil, dirty people. And they’re brown.
May 11th, 2007 at 5:07 pmPathetic1 at least is honest in why he supports the War, it’s a war against Muslims.
All Bush supporters are Xian, it’s the glue that binds.
Well, that and the dried shit left over from their daisy chains.
May 11th, 2007 at 5:14 pmLiberals,
do you think that thinkprogress.org is honest enough to report this?
http://news.yahoo.com/ s/ ap/ 20070511/ ap_on_go_co/ ap_poll_method_1
Congrats, Dems. You’ve accomplished in four months what it took Bush six years to do.
WASHINGTON A new poll indicates Americans are just as unhappy with the Democratic-led Congress as they are with President Bush.
The A-P-Ipsos poll found only 35 percent approve of how Congress is doing its job. That’s the same approval rating as the president.
More here.
Here’s some of the poll results:
Generally speaking, would you say things in this country are heading in the right direction, or are they off on the wrong track?
_Right direction, 25 percent (27)
_Wrong track, 71 percent (70)
_Not sure, 4 percent (3)
Overall, do you approve, disapprove or have mixed feelings about the way George W. Bush is handling his job as president?
_Approve, 35 percent (35)
_Disapprove, 61 percent (62)
_Mixed feelings, 3 percent (3)
_Not sure, 1 percent (X)
And when it comes to the economy, do you approve, disapprove or have mixed feelings about the way George W. Bush is handling that issue?
_Approve, 41 percent (38)
May 11th, 2007 at 5:15 pm_Disapprove, 56 percent (60)
_Mixed feelings, 2 percent (2)
_Not sure, 1 percent (X)
This is the link to, in my opinion, in a nutshell what’s the going on in this country right now.
http://www.911truth.org/ article.php?story=2007041283112370
I was thinking just now –even in a perfect world an Anti-War Candidate President and Vice-President took office in 2008, there would always be the dark lurking neocons (i.e. Cheney, Perle, etc.)ever trying to usurp power
May 11th, 2007 at 5:17 pmThis is just like all of the Congress members talking about how we need a “new direction” in Iraq but yet failing to offer one up and instead offering blind support for the occupation.
May 11th, 2007 at 5:17 pmNot even 50% of Americans agree with Pelosi and the job she is doing in Congress.
I take it that Liberals will believe that 55% of Americans are traitors since they disapprove of Pelosi. And even a greater number disapproves the Democratic Party led Congress. Nice!
since you Liberals live and die by polls, this should ruin your weekend! hahahahahahaa!!!!!
Overall, do you approve, disapprove or have mixed feelings about the way Congress is handling its job?
_Approve, 35 percent (40)
_Disapprove, 60 percent (57)
_Mixed feelings, 4 percent (2)
_Not sure, 1 percent (1)
___
Overall, do you approve, disapprove or have mixed feelings about the way Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record) is handling her job as speaker of the House of Representatives?
_Approve, 45 percent (46)
_Disapprove, 42 percent (44)
_Mixed feelings, 5 percent (4)
_Not sure, 8 percent (6)
May 11th, 2007 at 5:18 pmDear UnValiant :
This country took the wrong track when PNAC was devised and 9/11 was planned by the Shadow Government which became the NeoCON movement. Bush caused 9/11.
Screw you.
May 11th, 2007 at 5:20 pm#30
You seem to tar all Muslims with same brush. Why?
Comment by UKBristolDave — May 11, 2007 @ 4:43 pm
Because they’re evil, dirty people. And they’re brown.
Comment by CommanderGuyPat — May 11, 2007 @ 5:07 pm
If that is snark, say so. This is a very sensitive and painful subject. I will respond based on your answer
May 11th, 2007 at 5:21 pmTOTAL snark. My apologies.
May 11th, 2007 at 5:24 pmUntil further notice, this is my response to most everything going on in this country. I love this country but fear my government
–Kay
When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. —- Thomas Jefferson
A Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference. —- Thomas Jefferson
And if the Democrats cannot DO THE RIGHT THING and restore our rights and privacy the government has stripped from US, it may soon be time to follow this advice from Jefferson:
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. —- Thomas Jefferson
It is really telling when George Bush claims more rights and privacy than he is willing to allow WE THE PEOPLE.
May 11th, 2007 at 5:25 pmThings are really flip-flopped from the time of the founding fathers.
Kay,
typical liberal that lives in fear….stop your whinning and crying. If you fear the government so much, take up arms against it. Otherwise you are such another couch potatoe warrior.
get a life and a clue.
May 11th, 2007 at 5:31 pmget a life and a clue.
Comment by valiantthehater
So Posts the 2nd most clueless troll posting here, 2nd only to patrick1.
May 11th, 2007 at 5:35 pmIt’s funny to see Valienttheshiteater talk about liberals being afraid and whiny. The neocons are so afraid of the brown Muslims that they will sacrifice liberty and money and (other people’s kids) lives so they feel “safe”.
F*ck off and die, Repugnic*nt.
May 11th, 2007 at 5:40 pmHi I am Patrick1. I am too much of a big blubbering pu$$y to join the military, so I think others should fight my illegal holy wars for me. I will give any excuse to not have to fight my own battles. I was one of those wu$$ies that couldn’t fight the brawls that I started in high school and had to have my big brother stick up for me, because like I said I am the biggest pu$$y on this web site.
May 11th, 2007 at 5:41 pmWith all of our military might and power, the republicans are showing that at their hearts it is really fear itself they are worried about. We could leave Iraq today and be better able to monitor by sattelite and spy planes the progress the enemy may be trying to make and we have the ability to destroy it at any time from afar. There is no real need for such a huge force of troops on the ground when we have control of the air. Our mission should be to guard Iraq’s borders, maintain a small but stable force for training Iraqi’s and ensure that outside interference is stopped or at the very least minimized. Diplomacy by well educated, confident people must be utilized. It is time to change
May 11th, 2007 at 5:48 pmDear UnValiant,
Why aren’t you on the front lines with EVERY Senator’s/Rep’s sons and daughters? And Chimpy’s daughters? And Dead-Eye Dick’s (I wish)daughter.
ETC.
If you hate Muslims so much and feel so feverishly about this phony war on terror — why aren’t you over in Iraq or Afghanistan?
I get a kick out of Blow Hard, Fat Cheney ask everyone to put themselves in Harms Way and he’s had , what, 5 defferments?
May 11th, 2007 at 5:50 pmBye bye Republicans.
Patrick, you are growing smaller with every post you make.
May 11th, 2007 at 5:52 pmI wonder if these same congressmen would support a continued stay in Iraq after Iraqi Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi pulls out the Sunni bloc? At that point, the Iraqi government would truly be shiite only and Sadr would have even more influence.
May 11th, 2007 at 5:56 pmWell, they can have that attitude at their own peril. The 2008 election is going to be a bloodbath for Republics and it will be a well deserved bloodbath at that. Unfortunately an awful lot of our young men and women are going to have to die because of these people. They are all murderers and should be treated as such.
May 11th, 2007 at 5:59 pmAlso, what are they using to determine “progress”? Patreaus has already said they expect casualty rates to go up, and Bush himself said that we should not judge progress based on casualty rates. With Muqtada Sadr growing stronger in the Iraqi government, I wouldn’t consider that progress. And it will be very difficult for the government to make progress while taking a two month recess. So again, what are they using to determine “progress”?
May 11th, 2007 at 6:01 pm“Republicans want to fight the Islamists and Democrats don’t. And this is news how? Comment by Patrick1″
You are such an idiot. What does “fight the Islamists” mean to you? Do you mean that we should fight every person who believes in Islam? That’s a lot of people and will be a lot of fighting. It is really OK with you that we are killing our young men and women to try to steal Iraq’s oil? And please don’t give me the old “al Quaeda” talking point. The minute we leave Iraq, they will kick al Quaeda out of their country. They don’t like them any more than they like us.
You truly are an evil person with no soul. I pity the people who come into contact with you. You must put off toxic fumes.
May 11th, 2007 at 6:02 pmHow long would they have to go without seeing progress? I mean, if there is no progress between now and May of next year, will they continue to support this occupation?
May 11th, 2007 at 6:04 pmThat’s fine with me. It will only cause the wholesale extinction of the GOP that much faster.
May 11th, 2007 at 6:05 pm#38 Comment by CommanderGuyPat — May 11, 2007 @ 5:24 pm
TOTAL snark. My apologies.
I apologize, as well for my comment, CGP. I am still upset after seeing the video on UTube on the last thread. I knew it was snark but my feelings were screaming and needed verification. Please check my comment #68 on the last thread on how I feel.
Anyone who does not find this video both beautiful and deeply emotionally moving is dead inside… Like the trolls here.
Here is the video.
http://www.youtube.com/v/ervaMPt4Ha0&autopla
May 11th, 2007 at 6:05 pmQuote from President Bush:
“If the standard of success is no car bombings or suicide bombings,†Bush said, “we have just handed those who commit suicide bombings a huge victory.†He repeated later that people who “judge the administration’s [escalation] plan†based on such acts of violence “have just given Al Qaida or any other extremist a significant victories [sic].â€
So, if the rate of violence is not a measure of success, then what is? If violence drops, is that not progress? If violence increases, is that not a sign of failure?
May 11th, 2007 at 6:09 pmMerlin,
That movie’s some sappy sh*t
May 11th, 2007 at 6:15 pmI am more inclined every day to entertain the notion that Democrats really, really did want this war. it is a terrible notion, but at this point, I must consder how it is that this war criminal and his minions, have been and will be allowed to continue to bludgeon us over the head with their fascism. And from the so called “majority” in the congress? What do we get? Impeachement is off the table. Hey hey, well that leaves open the possibility that the next president can also assume the unitary presidential position and be totally in control of—- of what.
Why the oil fields, of course,
I am jaded. My respect and my admiration for this country has diminished and if I were younger, I would most certainly move to another place. with some sense of soul and some sense of morals intact. This country is declining and is submitting to fascism ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE. Why do you think that “impeachment” is off the table in spite of the criminal Bush?. This military occupation will most certainly be escalated no matter which party is in so called ‘control”. Democrats, excepting a handful,l are as much tied in to it as Republicans. Frick them. They are all the captors of the corporate big shots who are running the country. THEY ARE RUNNING OUR COUNTRY and the Democrats, well take a look at who the donors are to Hillary and oBAMA===THE OBSCENITY of raising millions upon millions of dollars just to get a chair in the oval office. IT IS OBSCENE . OBSCENE.
May 11th, 2007 at 6:17 pm#45 Comment by Kay — May 11, 2007 @ 5:50 pm
Dear UnValiant,
Why aren’t you on the front lines…
Silly you for asking!
May 11th, 2007 at 6:23 pmIt is obviously because he could not pass the mental and emotional requirements to get in. Your IQ has to be above 75 and you have to know not to put your pants on backwards. He does have blatent hatred going for him though, but as he could not control himself, or deal with orders, it did not help. Besides, he is height challenged, being a troll and all. And there was that thing about his bad breath. I keep telling these trolls to stop putting their foot in their mouth. But do they listen? Noooo. They think Listerine will solve the problem. Tsk, tsk.
Get a life and a clue
I’d much prefer a dog and a brew. I
May 11th, 2007 at 6:27 pm#55 Comment by Mr. President — May 11, 2007 @ 6:15 pm
Merlin,
That movie’s some sappy sh*t
To someone who is emotionally dead inside, it would be. You fit the bill, IMO. You have very little connection to life, as your posts consistantly show.
May 11th, 2007 at 6:30 pmSoon the people will take this into their own hands. If the Congress continues to play games with the people’s pocketbooks and continue to fund this illegal, amoral war, the people will withhold their taxes and it will be the end of their little game.
May 11th, 2007 at 6:36 pmWe have a constitutional crisis in this country right now; we’re owned by Communist China to the tune of 30+% and Congress is nothing but a bunch of whining pussies. People are getting damned sick and tired of the daily chicanery and tomfoolery parading as politics. If this congress doesn’t grow the balls to put their foot down on these out of control fascists running things, then the people will.
May 11th, 2007 at 6:37 pmThe people fund this government; if it fails the people, then the people will withold the funds…end of story.
May 11th, 2007 at 6:38 pmI don’t know why people are still continuing to do so with the horrendous failure of Katrina and now the failure to bring assistance to tornado-ravaged Kansas…..where is our money going? Certainly someone should be shouting to the rooftops about the 20 billion dollars which is “among the missing” in Iraq!! Where the heck is the outrage, people?
May 11th, 2007 at 6:39 pmCaption contest:
“You can fool some of the people all of the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on.”
May 11th, 2007 at 6:53 pmW, at Gridiron Club dinner, Washington D.C., March 24, 2001
Oooops! #64 was meant for the last thread. W. walking and smirking.
May 11th, 2007 at 6:56 pmSpineless yes men, you’ll get yours in Nov 08.
May 11th, 2007 at 7:16 pmActually, Merlin, that was a pretty good caption for this thread!!~
May 11th, 2007 at 7:19 pmHey Merlin, watching the video showing the agony of the poor families and friends at the graveside services of the fallen was pretty tough. I wonder who took those pictures? They aren’t the pictures the MSM shows, nor are they the ones the WH wants the public to see.
May 11th, 2007 at 7:20 pm…and may God take the war into the homes and families…
…of EVERY “CONSERVATIVE” Democrat and Repulsivescum TRAITOR…
…and may they ALL suffer ten thousand times…
…worse than their victims in Iraq (or anywhere else they decide to attack)…
…these racist, war profiteering, mass murdering CONSERVATIVE warmongers are not human beings…
…they are DEMONS…
…who deserve to suffer…
…all those who do not seek their destruction are aiders and abettors of mass murdering war profiteering TRAITORS…
…because DUHmeriKKKa will certainly be bankrupted (and irrevocably divided)…
… if L’il Dick, Bushiva…
…and their CONSERVATIVE inbred supporters and co-conspirators are not stopped!
May 11th, 2007 at 7:24 pmWhat defines “improved”?
These terms need nailing down. If there’s one thing anyone should have learned after more than six years of Bush-Cheney and Republican rule, it’s that words mean very different things to them than they do to everybody else.
Democrats aren’t stupid people. They know Bush has snookered them at every turn, so why are they letting these very vaguely and loosely defined ‘understandings’ get reported, to take root in the people’s minds? “General Petreus will report back in (first it was) the middle of summer (and now it seems the middle of summer means) September/October.” That’s when any further real discussion about Iraq has been put off to now. “And if there’s improvement….” What’s improvement? If five U.S. troops paint a school in one of the heavily reinforced zones, that’s going to be spun by Bush as improvement. Never mind that for children to attend that school, hundreds of U.S. troops have to surround the perimeter of it the whole time school is in.
With Hillary wanting to keep a residual military force in Iraq (70,000 troops), I don’t see either party desirous of ending this farce in Iraq. Apparently Democrats support the oil law being pushed on the Iraqis, and want the multinational oil corporations in there. I don’t see the Democrats’ commitment to leaving Iraq. After all, if the war is ended before the 08 elections, what are Democrats going to run on?
May 11th, 2007 at 7:29 pmClearly, the republicans know that they are in real trouble if the american populace connects the dots and sees just how much this war has really cost. Should Bush remove the troops now, it will be very clear that the responsibility for the damage, the costs, the lives, the body parts, rests solely with him. If Bush can drag this war on until the democrats take over in 2009 - well, obviously it will all be blamed on the new incoming democrat president. Outrageous, but most likely the thinking going on in the republican camps right now.
May 11th, 2007 at 9:31 pmdude… my understanding there is a theory that both congress and the president does NOT work for us people, they work, well as far as iraq
goes, they work for the fed…….. central banks…….. to put us into
debt for eternity…….. THAT’S RIGHT…… the federal reserve BANKERS
IT REALLY DOESN’T MATTER WHETHER OR NOT WE WIN OR LOSE IN IRAQ,
what matters IS THE DEBT…… so they keep taking out loans and spending so the federal reserve bank continues to swindle us out of interest FOREVER…
to make us debt slaves, that’s what the theory of what is it freedom to
fascism is all about.
it all has to do with kennedy assisination and after since then we went from like 10 billion in debt up to 1 trillion in just 20 short years.
and regarding george bush serving us…. from something like 1 trillion dollars debt to very close to 9 trillion in just 6 short years
POLITICAL
PARASITES
HIGH CLASS HOODLUMS I SAY
CORRUPT AS HELL
AND ENOUGH TO MAKE EVERYONE P**E THEM OUT OF OFFICE DUDE
BUT
May 11th, 2007 at 9:43 pmTHE
SYSTEM
IS
RIGGED DUDE RIGGED
I’d say that fully 67% of congressional ref*cklicans need to have their bleeding asses handed to them in ‘08. Let’s do the work…
May 11th, 2007 at 9:56 pm(%&#@*$@(($$( f*cking Republicans. These bastards are Amerikan Nazis. The sooner they are dead and buried, the better for the USA & the world.
May 11th, 2007 at 10:09 pmit doesn’t matter dude…. just 6 short months and now the democrats are
balking at reform to a open and accountable congress to serve the people
and on 5/8/2007 http://www.corruptionchronicles.com ran a clip on pelosi sneaking
in a earmark for a financial gain for her husband, the article clearly stated
pelosi is a “pro” at basically swindling earmarks
BASICALLY WE ARE DEALING WITH LIARS
POLITICAL
PARASITES
LEEACHES
A
CESSPOOL
OF
TOTAL
CORRUPTION
BASICALLY POLITICAL LEECHES THAT SUCK OFF YOU AND ME
AND TO THINK AT LEAST 4 MORE YEARS OF THIS CRAP…. IT ONLY
May 11th, 2007 at 10:20 pmTOOK NOT EVEN 6 SHORT MONTHS
67 Percent Of Congressional GOP Say No Iraq Exit Even If War Hasn’t Improved By September
In contrast, 59 percent of congressional Democrats said they believe Congress will pass withdrawal legislation if conditions don’t improve.
My god it’s like they’re two opposing political parties or something.
BTW is the idea that the Democrat numbers of a slim 59% majority are a strong indication of something ?
Like the strong ~60% of Americans who want stronger gun laws but know that 60% isn’t enough to even have a meaningful discussion about this let alone legislative action.
Again I’ve got to ask, have you considered measuring your articles against some kind of “does this help” scale Nico ?
May 12th, 2007 at 12:52 amDemocrats don’t want to fight a war against a religion. Hitler did the same against the Jews. he wanted to fight jewry while Democrats didn’t. Patrick1 has it right. Thanks Patrick1 for showing the colors of the facsist party.
Comment by Kareem Abdul jabbar — May 11, 2007 @ 4:39 pm
Hey Kareem, Hitler wanted to destroy the Jews because he thought they were an inferior RACE, not because of their religion. Get with the program, buddy.
——–
Is my summary off or should you correct the headline for this article which appears to overstate the situation.
Comment by angryvietnamvet — May 11, 2007 @ 4:43
Seems to be a regular problem with TP these days.
——–
Until further notice, this is my response to most everything going on in this country. I love this country but fear my government :
Comment by Kay — May 11, 2007 @ 5:07 pm
Careful there, Kay. You risk having your own kind turn on you by admitting you love this country despite the fact that you disagree with the administration. These are examples of acceptable ways for liberals to refer to their country:
“…‘Merika.”
Comment by Ben Dover — March 13, 2007 @ 1:46 pm
…DUHmeriKKKa…
Comment by big papa — May 11, 2007 @ 7:24 pm
——–
Democrats aren’t stupid people. They know Bush has snookered them at every turn, so why are they letting these very vaguely and loosely defined ‘understandings’ get reported, to take root in the people’s minds?
Comment by Maeven — May 11, 2007 @ 7:29 pm
They are all politicians first and foremost.
——–
dude… my understanding there is a theory that both congress and the president does NOT work for us people, they work, well as far as iraq
goes, they work for the fed…….. central banks…….. to put us into
debt for eternity…….. THAT’S RIGHT…… the federal reserve BANKERS
Comment by jimbo DUDE — May 11, 2007 @ 9:43 pm
Dude…lay off the weed for a while before you post.
May 12th, 2007 at 1:30 am