I’m in three courts right now as a pro se litigant.

1. Case against Intergraph and the corporations teamed with them, or some way assisted them, was filed in the Superior Court. Currently in discovery phase.

2. Another case against Intergraph was filed in the U.S. District Court for violations of the Sherman Act: Information can be found here: http://www.facingthesharks.com/?p=32

3. A case against Robins Air Force Base, Senator Chambliss, Senator Isakson, Congressman Marshall, Governor Purdue and the Small Business Administration can be found here: http://www.facingthesharks.com/?p=31

These cases also involve H1B visa issues, because on information and belief the company Intergraph teamed with has H1B visas and failed to notify the SBA about their visas, and were able to get 8(a) status. They offered me a huge bribe to drop my protest.

A government employee directly involved in the contract award told me if I didn’t agree not to file suit against the 8(a) company, they wouldn’t award me a contract. I refused to drop my lawsuit. She also told me they would award the contract to Intergraph (who had an unfair advantage because they helped me write the statement of work for my contract)

I wouldn’t drop my protest, so they falsified information to the GAO, hid the requirements and awarded the contract to Intergraph. Believe it or not, they put their threats in writing, and Intergraph admitted in affidavits that they breached my nondisclosure and represented the government, however, they are making me go the whole nine yards in this case and have refused mediation.

Contractors have been told if they associate with me, they will lose their contracts. One refused to quit associating with me, and they took his contracts away. They are working on blackballing the other company that was going to team with me.

Are we having fun yet?

Congress should confiscate the assets of every last manager at Halliburton, and all its subsidiaries, including the billions hidden in offshore banks, and apply it back to the trillions in debt that the BushDick war has run up.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070511/ap_on_go_co/lobbying_reform;_ylt=AjbErzKgXNik_kwBG65RVMRp24cA

WASHINGTON – House Democrats are suddenly balking at the tough lobbying reforms they touted to voters last fall as a reason for putting them in charge of Congress.

Now that they are running things, many Democrats want to keep the big campaign donations and lavish parties that lobbyists put together for them. They’re also having second thoughts about having to wait an extra year before they can become high-paid lobbyists themselves should they retire or be defeated at the polls.

The growing resistance to several proposed reforms now threatens passage of a bill that once seemed on track to fulfill Democrats’ campaign promise of cleaner fundraising and lobbying practices.

What a joke! The do nothing Congress is, well, still doing nothing!

We’ve fallen…

…and we can’tget up!

…STUPID bi*ches…

Since September 11 the Bush administration has implemented a number of interrelated programs that were planned in the 1980s under President Reagan. Continuity of Government (COG) proposals—a classified plan for keeping a secret “government-within-the-government” running during and after a nuclear disaster—included vastly expanded detention capabilities, warrantless eavesdropping, and preparations for greater use of martial law.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_Inmate_Labor_Program

Wikipedia:

Civilian Inmate Labor Program -

The Civilian Inmate Labor Program is a program of the United States Army provided by Army Regulation 210-35[1]. The regulation, first drafted in 1997 and went under a “rapid act revision” in January 2005, provides policy for the creation of labor programs and prison camps on Army installations. The labor would be provided by persons under the supervision of the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

Prison camps

The regulation also sets forth policy for the creation of prison camps on Army installations. These would be used to keep inmates of the labor programs resident on the installations.

In January 2006, Kellogg, Brown and Root reported that they had received a contract from the Department of Homeland Security to expand ICE DRO facilities “in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs.”[3] A February news article comments that the “new programs” mentioned could include the Civilian Inmate Labour Program.[4] ICE has “joint federal facilities” with the Federal Bureau of Prisons.[5]

Swift Luck greens:
http://www.democracyforums.com/showthread.php?tid=297

HANNA, WY
Latitude: 41.92
Longitude: -106.521944

Trolls can’t muster any defense against this evidence.

This report is why their arguments are hollow.

Comment by Mr. President — May 11, 2007 @ 3:10 pm

No they don’t. 8(a) set-asides are at most 3% of all federal contracts.
If anything, the thing that has the government by the balls is the excessive bureaucracy that makes the competitive process take a year or more.

Imagine that!

Can you say: Car-lyle? Halliburton? SAIC? and on and on and on and on and on and on and on

Remember the FORKLIFTS of CASH Bremer had shipped over to Iraq?
Remember the $9 BILLION that went missing? Remember their off-shore accounts?

Denmark? Rotten in DENMARK? Ha!

Comment by Mr. President

Funny, but government agencies everywhere demand competitive bidding, even on the smallest of contracts. According to capitalists, competition is good (except when they have the monopoly) and generally recognized to be more efficient and more economical than simply handing over contracts to friends.