Apparently, to the flaghumping bush lovers, somewhere in the constitution is says that “innocent until proven guilty” doesnt apply to any accused of involvement with terrorism.

It is so pathetic that the staff at the DoJ are all resigning, stonewalling, taking the 5th, destroying evidence, or developing amnesia while this man has languished in prison for longer than any sentence for the crime he might be convicted of. For shame.

Say, do you think when we get to hell ya could show me howda get this buttons to actually do something?

Dont worry, there are a lot of scary men you can piss yourself at the thought of…

comment by J Snott
——————————————

funny, but it seems to me that all of the CLOSETED gays are in the REPUBLICAN PARTY. As Democrats, we tend to “live and let live”….
NOT persecute,hurt,and destroy, which seems to me to be the Republican mantra..

It’s either that(for the GOP)or Givin’ Oral to Pages…

not sure…

Is THAT the best that you can do, Nazi azzhole-licker?

It’s the GALLOWS for YOU, “mr. president”!!!!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

See YOU in hell “mr. president” (cause I am YOU and I’LL be THERE),

Mr. Bush
MURDEROUS WAR CRIMINAL
COXUCKER PUNK TRAITOR TO THE USA (TM–BushCrimeCo, Inc.)

This was because the Taliban was seen as hostile to America and democracy. Bush came in and changed all that.

In addition, Bush also dropped Islamic terrorism from being the top foreign policy and national security issue, to being a 3rd tier issue, behind missile defense, the deratification of Kyoto, North Korea, Iraq, Iran (those 3 sound familiar?), China, Latin American leftists, etc. Bush stopped hunting Osama bin Laden, since, after all, according to you republican traitors, Osama was an overblown threat propped up to divert attention from Lewinsky.

With all that, as well as his complete failure to act in any way to the sharp warnings received by the intelligence community that Al Qaeda was threatening an attack on airplanes, on which Bush was twice briefed, it’s pretty amazing that 9/11 happened, eh? We really need habeas corpus removed, and torture instituted, and domestic spying and fascist powers for the Executive branch, eh? We don’t need a competent President, eh?

Numbnuts.

Comment by Spudge_Boy — May 14, 2007 @ 4:44 pm

Study after study shows that it is more EXPENSIVE to give the death penalty than to give life in prison. It is true, that much of the added cost is the cost of legal appeals. But then so many of those appeals are needed because people are convicted and sentenced to die without evidence, without a fair trial, and many are later found innocent by better evidence, such as DNA. Or by suppressed evidence. In this case, there is likely to be a paucity of evidence because the government under the Bush administration has not been interested in facts, just association. Even thin association. This is not a war on terror, but a war on our own system of justice waged by our government against us. It is using the BIG LIE tactics of the Fasciasts of last Century. Ah, well, they were due for a come back.

Previous posts have indicated that 1/4 of the internees at Gitmo are innocent. It is unlikely that even 1/4 have any link to terrorism. The story that these people were “picked up on the battlefield” is untrue. There are some truely dangerous people there, but only a small identified group. Many have been cruelly tortured by us (this is America, our Government is us, remember).

Sure he can be tried for training as a terrorist, although there would have to be some evidential linkage to the intent to cause material harm. But that isn’t why he was arrested or held, and it isn’t why his transfer to civil justice was fought tooth and nail.

So there is an accounting that should follow, on the perversion of the justice system to incarcerate this man and smear his name with unrelated deeds. Otherwise, friends, it could be you next that’s held on charges that have no footing in reality.

(and of course then after 9/11 happened, W and his band of tards attacked the wrong country, cuz of a Daddy complex.) W and the GOP have done more to further the goals of the jihadists than Osama could have ever done on his own. the GOP, in addition to being the party of fascists, is also the party of terrorist supporters.

waiting for ad hominem attack…

The 2001 budget sent some money to the Taliban, who at the time had not helped Al Qaeda launch an assault on our nation.

That was quickly rectified.

#27

I would rather he not have aided our enemies, but since he has fraternized with Al Qaeda, he must be dealt with.

Comment by m12 — May 14, 2007 @ 4:54 pm

There is no evidence of that other than some DoD person saying it. Have you reviewed the evidence? No, you haven’t, because zero pieces of evidence has been produced in 5 years.

So, what you are saying is you support guilty until proven innocent?

Good little brown shirt.

May you meet the same fate you hope for others.

…5, 4, 3…

That’s not what you said. You said you hoped he was guilty. I still want to know why you Hope is guilty. Why would you want that?

And apparently from your last statement I must deduce that you have some evidence that the Judge has not yet seen. I say this because according to the post “U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke warned prosecutors last summer that the indictment was “light on facts.””

Do you know something the rest do not? How do you KNOW that he had dealings with Al Qaeda? As faulty as our Justice System can be, I will trust the judgement of an informed jury over your, what I must define as, completely uniformed opinion.

So you’re advocating both President Bush’s be dealt with? Since Bush I supported Al Qaeda in Afghanistan? And even Bush Jr. was sending money to them in 2001 before we were attacked?

You really are an idiot.

I would rather he not have aided our enemies, but since he has fraternized with Al Qaeda, he must be dealt with.