“It is clear to any unbiased observer that Comey’s story makes no sense and leads one to be thankful that our AG is the honest plain-spoken Gonzales and not a conniving schemer like Comey.”

Arre you serious? COME ON #56! Are you aware that, before lunch on the first day of US Attorney testimony, Gonzo said, ‘I don’t remember,’ in one form ore another 71 times? It’s a verifiable fact–I kid you not. Once, he actually said, “I don’t recall remembering.” ‘Impressive! ‘Two ‘I don’t remembers’ in one sentence. It takes a record-setting amount of gall to call Fredo honest. ‘Nice job.

While your use of words like ‘animus’ and ‘histrionics’ suggest you have access to a thesaurus, your opinion is proof you have no access to the media.

Just admit it–you made a mistake in the voting booth in ‘04.

“It is clear to any unbiased observer that Comey’s story makes no sense and leads one to be thankful that our AG is the honest plain-spoken Gonzales and not a conniving schemer like Comey.” ?!?!?

Are you serious? COME ON 56! Do you even watch the news or read the paper? Do you realize that Gonzales said, “I don’t remember,” 71 times before lunch on the first day of testimony on the US Attorney firings? Once he actually said, “I don’t recall remembering.” I p$h!t you not–two ‘I don’t remembers’ in one sentence. Impressive. It takes a record-setting amount of gall to call Gonzo honest.

Though I feel that your use of words like ‘histrionics’ and ‘animus’ prove you own a thesaurus, your actual opinion is ample evidence that you don’t have access to any form of media.

lmao, ya red!

Yes, because it takes a real spine not to question authority.

As Americans, we remain free to obey, and free to conform. Anyone who wishes to use his freedom for other purposes is a coward.

If that is the case, and the way Gonzales parses words, it seems entirely plausible that he was telling the truth about no serious disagreement about the wiretaps, but if Comey is (not) talking about some other program, then it must be a DOOZY – especially if Ashcroft was ready to resign over it.

This scenario fits all the current evidence. Don’t be surprised if the sheit really hits the fan before too long: Someone will let the cat out of the bag, now that Congress under the Democrats is not enabling Bush.

Read Gonzalez’ testimony – he quite clearly and craftily states that no one objected to the Dec 2005 version of the program, and he is probably right – Comey’s own version is that DoJ objected to the Mar 2004 version of the program, and changes were made to accomodate them.

Is this complicated?

You know that Sponge Bob movie where Nemo’s daughter says “Stalling? I’m not stalling.” only she says it REALLY slow. That’s what this is.

Rep Conyers–please face Gonzales with the implications of participating in an episode like the “massacre” of Watergate.

When asked by Keith Olbermann if we had reached the point of needing a…

…Special Prosecutor to investigate this Bush domestic wiretapping crime…

…Turley replied that we had long ago pased that point…

…and he added…

…”The problem is Keith, this is a clearly IMPEACHABLE offense. Nopresident in modern history has EVER had such an impeachable (situation).”

TRANSLATION:

If we don’t IMPEACH and PROSECUTE these bi*ches…

…we might as well become a dictatorship…

…because we’ll NEVER be able to IMPEACH a president EVER!

If you know Repulsivescum Bushites…

…PRESSURE them to call for THEIR Representatives and congresspeople…

…to IMPEACH this son-of-a-bi*ch!

What a load of crap. No one knew what the hell the story meant back them. They hadn’t caught up with the Gonzales we now know who is incompetent and certainly no AG but still works as a WH counsel. The “schemer” is self-evident by merely listening to Comey and then to Gonzales. It’s very easy to see. Their personalities give them away. You just want to sweep it all under the rug…nothing to see here. You also give yourself away by using the phrase ” al-Queda and their minions within the USA”, pathetic fear mongering. Far from “histronics”, we are all paying attention now that the corruption and lies are pouring out of this administration, who, like the ” honest and (ha-ha) plain spoken “(I can’t remember, I can’t recall) AG makes plain by ignoring a subpoena and forgetting to turn over pertinent withheld DoJ-WH documents and the conveniently lost emails of Rove, not to mention the hiring and firing practices of Goodling (which he approved), ran an illegal operation for weeks because Comey wouldn’t sign off on it and neither would Ashcroft. But you say nothing to see here, just a bunch of liberal bloggers making something out of nothing. Better to keep one’s mouth shut and let people wonder if you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt as in Comment # 56. The only way to not know is to not want to know(Penn-Warren) and it’s for certain you don’t want to know. Look at what you have become, another complacent denier of truth…or in other words, a spineless liar.

…used to be…

…I want some fu*kin’ blood!

…and treasure…

Nice try.

Though it does beg the question raised by Comey’s testimony which indicated a centrality of the FBI head in this matter, which when taken in context with Feingold’s question about whether this was some other domestic spying program, does hint at the sort of speculation you talk about.

#17 Convening a Grand Jury is something the DoJ has to do. It is not something Congress can do. SO in essence you are demanding that Bush convene a Grand Jury on himself and blaming Democrats in Congress for him not doing so.