Not only did Scalia NOT recuse himself. He wrote the final opinion on Gore Vs. Bush. Read all about it in “The Betrayal of a Nation”–all about how the supreme court circumvented the constitution and the will of a nation, by Vincent (Helter Skelter) Bugliosi. I may be wrong here, but I believe that after Scalia wrote the majority opinion, NOT ONE of the “justices” signed it, (first time that has ever happened?). So, let’s look back and see how the dots connect for me:

1.) 2000 stolen presidency.

2.) 9/11

3.) No investigation of 9/11 required by the Bush administration.

4.) We invade 2 SOVEREIGN nations, (WITH NO DIRECT TIES TO 9/11), so as to engage in illegal wars without end, neither country was directly involved with 9/11. 15 of the 19 highjackers involved are from Saudi Arabia, NOT invaded. The complicit media beats the war drums, while quoting verbatim, white house talking points, perpetuating the myth of the so-called liberal-media ALL THE WHILE.

5.) Widespread voter disenfranchisement, becoming more apparent in 2002 mid-terms. Voters fucked in Florida by Jeb Bush’s own Katherine Harris, (mostly black/other minorities), STILL cannot vote.

6.) ANOTHER stolen presidential election in 2004, this time Ohio, thanks to bushman Kenneth Blackwell.

7.) Now the Bushies and the garbage MSM start beating the war drums for MORE war in Iran.

8.) 9/11, Abu Ghraib, Haditha, Rumsfeld, Plame-Gate, Scooter Libby, Prosecutor-Gate, George Tenet, Jessica Lynch/Pat Tillman, Medicare RX fiasco, Walter Reed, NEW ORLEANS, Mike Brown, Paul Wolfowitz, etc.

WHAT DOES BUSH HAVE TO DO TO BE IMPEACHED? Ass-rape a protected species, murder a child, etc., on prime-time television?

By becoming an independent and voting with the Dems, Jeffords replaced Inhofe as chairman.

Here’s another thought. If Jeffords was “wrong” by renouncing his Rethugnican affiliation wasn’t it just as “treasonous” when several mostly southern Dem congressmen switched sides in 1994? At least Jeffords became an independent.

Comment by krose — May 17, 2007 @ 11:13 am

Because half of the Senate are still members of that crime family.

Impeach Justice Scalia, Bush, Cheney and Gonzales :)

The voters elected a Republican. They wanted a Republican. Jeffords chose to dishonor this intention.

If he decided to have “morals”, why didn’t he switch a few months earlier before election day to give the voters a chance to decide what they wanted?

Comment by m12 — May 16, 2007

Nonsense. The voters elected Jim Jeffords, not a label. Jim is not exactly an unknown quantity in Vermont.

Additionally from the same article that M12 provides: “He (Scalia) has worked to kill or weaken worker safety standards nationally, as well as in California, North Carolina, and Washington. In his personal writings, he has criticized the science underlying ergonomics as junk science par excellence and quackery,” said Sweeney.

Sweeney also said Scalia is “an individual whose extreme views on key worker protections place him outside the mainstream and make him unsuited to hold this important position. Eugene Scalia is simply the wrong person for the job.”

Yeah, m12, it was JUST the name the ‘dims’ objected to! It had *nothing* to do with the the man’s performance record.

It’s the Bushies who should fear a confrontation for just this reason, but the Bushies will sacrifice all effective governance to the egos and pride of their inner circle.

Eugene Scalia did not participate in any way in the Bush v Gore case.

Obviously, you’re either a complete fool or you didn’t know how to read. Educate yourself.

The Scalia in this case is not the Supreme Court Justice, it was his son Eugene, who the Democrats decided to filibuster due to his last name. Read about him here.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=%5CNation%5Carchive%5C200301%5CNAT20030108a.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Scalia