Think Progress

Neoconservatives Gather To Applaud Scooter Libby And Ponder Next Targets For Regime Change

libbyCommentary magazine, “widely regarded as the leading outlet for neoconservative writing,” held its first annual dinner this week in honor of its former editor-in-chief Norman Podhoretz. The evening got started with rousing cheers for Scooter Libby. The crowd of 300 delivered “a standing ovation” for Libby, “who was in attendance while awaiting sentencing on his felony convictions.”

Participants then proceeded to more substantive issues at hand — namely, consideration of post-Iraq regime change targets. The Christian Science Monitor writes that “Commentary advocates passionate support for Israel, and regime change in at least half a dozen countries deemed hostile to US and Israeli security and interests.” Along those lines, in the most current issue of the magazine, Norman Podhoretz argues “The Case for Bombing Iran.”

One of the evening’s keynote speakers, former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton, took Podhoretz’s claims even further. The New York Sun’s Ira Stoll writes that Bolton delivered what appeared to be his regime change hit list, with a country-by-country breakdown:

Ambassador John Bolton’s speech on why regime change, notwithstanding the problems in Iraq, “has to be something that’s in our toolbox as we go forward.” … He also supported regime change in Iraq in the immediate aftermath of the first Persian Gulf War, and in Afghanistan in the late 1990s.

Then, moving briskly to present-day examples, Mr. Bolton backed regime change in North Korea and Iran. As for Cuba, he said that “actuarial tables will take care” of it, referring to the aging Castro. Sudan, he said, was not a sufficient threat to American interests to justify a policy of regime change. Burma, he noted, recently was reported to be entering a contract with Russia for a research nuclear reactor, but “I don’t think that’s a regime that warrants regime change.” Venezuela, he said last year purchased 100,000 AK-47s. “Not yet but maybe” was Mr. Bolton’s position on regime change in Venezuela. Syria is the “hardest” case, Mr. Bolton said, seeming to think that what came after Assad there might be worse.

The failed neoconservative designs on Iraq do not appear to have quenched their desire to continue their global regime change campaign.



98 Responses to “Neoconservatives Gather To Applaud Scooter Libby And Ponder Next Targets For Regime Change”

  1. Fools on the Hill says:

    This group might be the reason why Romney wants to double the size of GITMO.


  2. Tom says:

    Looks like were gonna be at war for a looooooong time, folks.


  3. Crump's Brother says:

    “Yes. We love our convicted felons!! Long may they be guilty!!!”


  4. Zooey says:

    The crowd of 300 delivered “a standing ovation” for Libby, “who was in attendance while awaiting sentencing on his felony convictions.”

    What more do we need to know about neo-cons? They not only flaunt their convicted felons, they applaude them.


  5. Zooey says:

    Ambassador John Bolton’s speech on why regime change, notwithstanding the problems in Iraq, “has to be something that’s in our toolbox as we go forward.”

    Mr Mustache Ride wants to take over the world, and he doesn’t mind who knows it.


  6. tballou says:

    “The failed neoconservative designs on Iraq do not appear to have quenched their desire to continue their global regime change campaign.”

    Or quenched their bloodlust.


  7. big papa says:

    …maybe there can be a “decapitating” strike…

    …the NEXT time these corrupt, fascist, neocon TRAITORS meet…

    …take ‘em all prisoners…

    …and we might save our Union…


  8. ForTruth. says:

    Oh crap Mustache ride man is back on TP. AAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

    Oh hi Zooey.


  9. Mr. President says:

    “Iraq is just *one* obstacle in our way, but with each successive radical Islamic state converted to healthy democracy, the Muslim shiteaters will have one less country full of f*ckheads feeding them crap about 70 virgins.

    Comment by Mr. President — May 16, 2007 @ 9:19 pm

    I Called IT!!!!!

    (I wanna shout out to my boy Scoota, he ’bout ta get locked up y’all. Everybody… po’ out some licka for da dead hommie, Jerry Falwell.. you know dere’s a heaven 4 a G, we miss you playboy. Finally, for all dose hatin’ on a pimp, ch’all needa back up off me a watch the playa play! and I’m outta dis b!tch.)


  10. TripMaster Monkey says:

    The assembled neocons then went on to sacrifice an unbaptized baby boy and drink his blood while offering their praise to Moloch.


  11. Zooey says:

    Oh crap Mustache ride man is back on TP. AAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
    Oh hi Zooey.
    Comment by ForTruth

    I am completely recovered. Thank you very much. :P


  12. SouthWest Bob says:

    Perhaps the dictionaries of the world need to be modified.

    NeoCons: See Arrogance – –noun – offensive display of superiority or self-importance; overbearing pride.


  13. Briseadh na Faire says:

    My God, these people are actually applauding International War Crimes!

    How long will it be before the rest of the world decides that regime change is needed in the U.S.?

    This group is making an excellent case for pre-emptive strikes against America!


  14. paland says:

    I really don’t know what to think about this. Can’t they see their failed policy in Iraq? Can’t they see their beloved dictator falling down and hard? Do they think they are going to retain power? Are they just dreaming?

    Seriously, this group is dangerous. To actually see them think they are going to make an Empire after what the world has seen from this group borders on the insane. And that is the scary part.


  15. Angry One says:

    While conservatives praise a convicted felon, you can see the results of the “Sentence Scooter Contest.”


  16. m12 says:

  17. TerrytheTurtle says:

    Sounds like a meeting of the Mein Kampf Society…..


  18. VerbalKint says:

    Obviously these clowns haven’t realized yet that their time is over. PNAC is dying and will soon be dead.


  19. TerrytheTurtle says:

    The mark of a Nazi is how cheap they are with other people’s lives….


  20. big papa says:

    THEY are the enemy…

    …and MUST be DESTROYED…

    …NOW!


  21. Tom says:

    Next regime change target –> John “Got Milk?” Bolton


  22. TerrytheTurtle says:

    Why? Did you fart in here, m12?


  23. gummitch says:

    Can you say “circle jerk”? These guys are so totally out of touch with reality that they think they’re still shaping the future of the world.


  24. TerrytheTurtle says:

    After all, m12, the differences between your posts and a room clearing blast from a trouser trumpet are hard to discern..


  25. ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus says:

    How about regime change at the world bank – it’s run by a Corrupt and ethically challenged dictator with a totalitarian management style. Oh wait, Wolfie is another NeoCon!!! HEHEHEHE


  26. Jim says:

    John Bolton looks like a homeless guy.


  27. TerrytheTurtle says:

    Verbalkint – 1920s Germans laughed at Hitler…..


  28. WaltTheMan says:

    John Bolton looks like a hopeless gay.


  29. CFM 56-3 says:

    I would hope we consider fixing Iraq and stabilizing our economy before moving on to other deemed important quagmires.


  30. Sharon says:

    Don’t look Lady Z, the walrus is back…Blessings


  31. TerrytheTurtle says:

    Burma doesn’t warrant regime change? Don’t the people of Burma deserve a chance to escape oppressive military rule, allow their Nobel Prize winning Suu Kyi a chance to restore democracy, dignity and close the clothing sweat shops…?

    Nice shirt, Bolton, where’s it from?


  32. Wayne says:

    Neocons celebrating a convicted felon.
    My my, doesn’t that show exactly why they have gotten this country in the big mess we have now?
    Republican Neocons = Mafia-R-US


  33. j swift says:

    wow, the neo-cons have the distinct honor of providing the United States with the very first President of the World Bank to leave in disgrace and they give standing ovations to felons.

    Such integrity. It makes one all weepy-eyed at the moral superiority displayed amongst the members of the Republican elite.

    A shame too, all us Democrats have to crow about is a guy who lies about a blowjob in the oval office.


  34. Quizmos says:

    Why not just “take out” the Neo-cons (in a Pat Robertson kind of way, of course)?


  35. david says:

    Bolton reminds me of the Swede in those old Woody Woodpecker cartoons. Yumpin Yiminy!


  36. TerrytheTurtle says:

    “Blow them all away in the name of Jesus” – Jerry its-a-roasting-tonight Falwell.


  37. demdandy says:

    John Bolton looks like he just escaped from the loony bin. These neocon idiots don’t realize we the people are going to stop them from performing on their sadistic delusions.


  38. CFM 56-3 says:

  39. midwestblue says:

    The tide having turned against this administration, these neoncons are now just a bunch of impotent old men, reminiscing about the last five years, fantasizing about what they could have accomplished, if only they’d had just a little more power. Like loyal Nazis after Hilter’s death, they’ll slink into the background, dreaming of the next Fuhrer, right up until death snuffs out their evil lives.


  40. WaltTheMan says:

    #35 – david,
    Geez, you are old!


  41. ace says:

    What percentage of those giving the standing ovation were Zionists?

    Try 100%.

    Now do you see who you real enemies are?


  42. yep says:

    The crowd of 300 delivered

    As in the movie 300, I hope this crowd puts their own lives on the line.


  43. xenon says:

    Time to fill the bunker with cement…Jesus, what a hornet’s nest.


  44. WaltTheMan says:

    #41 – yep,
    As W would say “I can’t deliver, I can only f(ck things up. Call an OBG.”


  45. TerrytheTurtle says:

    Ooh I’m going long now, Yep:

    Wolfy, leather thong, red cape, pulling his comb out of his crotch to straighten his eyebrow hair…….


  46. LandSurveyor says:

    Oh yeah?! You and what Army! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!


  47. j swift says:

    yep #41

    Naw, these guys are types who con and pay some poor drunken slob to stand in proxy for them, particularly in a fight to the last battle.

    I can see it now. The neo-cons wandering through and broken corpses saying: “Right here! This is the fellow! Lordy! I did die bravely didn’t I!”


  48. j swift says:

    oh my proof reading s*cks.

    that is “fight to the death” and “through the broken corpses”


  49. big papa says:

    File this under your “DAMN I didn’t know that!” file…

    …unless you KNEW…

    …defense contractor Lockheed- Martin in 1996…

    …was awarded the contract to administer Kansas’ child welfare system…

    …L-M officials claim that administering these services represents one of its two fastest growing business lines…

    …the number of their federal clients grew from 0 to 25 in the 2 years after…

    …Bill Clinton’s federal welfare reform passed…

    …this from Governing magazine…

    …Florida did the same thing for a while…

    …and Maricopa County in AZ uses Maximus Corp to run its temporary aid to needy families program…

    …how’s THAT for privatization gone wild?


  50. Lee says:

    What the f*ck does “Strap-on” know anyway?!

    Let’s hear it for neo-cons. Standing ovations for convicted felons, smiling big for your mug shot (Limbaugh, Delay, etc.), and calling yourself a Christian while having a jock itch to bomb/invade sovereign nations.

    After Iran, is North Korea next? No. Why? Easy. Oil.

    Nuff said.


  51. big papa says:

    sorry f/t the double post…

    …but the third shift at TP…

    …is kinda lagging…


  52. Republicans are the Fear and Smear Party says:

    Applauding a felon says a lot about neocons. Obviously they have no respect for the American laws and the American justice system that they pretend to cherish…the very system they want to export around the world. This disrespect for democracy is a fine example to set for their children who will turn out to hate America even more than their parents.

    Note to neocons: You’re supposed to “boo” felons. You know, felons that commit felonies! Yeah, that kind!


  53. David O. says:

    O.K. war-mongering, neo-CON _SCUM_, next time YOU can fight your folly- wars. No more sending the underclass to fight them-
    you’ve lost what credibility you ever had among the thinking of this World.
    Go, go away, quietly or not, just GO AWAY.


  54. neoconlovechild says:

    This is all the Clintons fault!
    Ron Paul is a traitor to the Rpublican Party!
    Only the Republicans can make the world safe!
    Life will be better if you just trust us!
    Love is a cold gun!

    Ashcroft is my hero
    Shahaha deserves every penny she got from Wolfy
    Secular Humanism is for the weak
    Whiney Liberuls
    Imus should never have been fired
    Paul Wolfowitz for president
    E plurabus Unum
    See I know everything!

    TLC


  55. Juan C says:

    Whenever I see Bolton, I remember this and I smile.


  56. TomR says:

    —-
    The crowd of 300 delivered “a standing ovation” for Libby, “who was in attendance while awaiting sentencing on his felony convictions.”
    —-

    I guess we never need worry about the neocons growing a conscience.

    We can count on them to remain the barrel of rotten apples that they are, that we must strive to make sure never gain power in any branches of our government ever again.

    - Tom


  57. Karim says:

    These freaks never learn do they?



  58. Jay Randal says:

    Bolton and the rest of the Neocons must be transported to Iraq to patrol the streets of Baghdad. Give them NO security guards and may they rest in peace > lol.


  59. neoconlovechild says:

    Neocons will rule the world
    Everyone will pay that doesn’t believe in us
    Only we can bring good to the world
    Can you say Libruls are weak
    Only the strong can understand Leo Strauss
    Neocons are feared by the left
    See your all weak

    Ron Paul should be deported

    Gonzo is the God of my religion
    Alberto will bring you torture
    You all think your so smart


  60. Wayne says:

    #52 —Comment by neoconlovechild

    Should have put my coffee down before reading that one.

    Still LMAO


  61. Briseadh na Faire says:

    While conservatives praise a convicted felon, you can see the results of the “Sentence Scooter Contest.”

    Comment by Angry One — May 17, 2007 @ 8:50 pm

    Thanks for the update, and the link.

    I got “Honorable Mention!” Whoo-hoo!


  62. criticalthinker says:

    The only silver lining in the dark cloud is that the American people now have a bad taste for war and for volunteering for the military, just like they did after Vietnam, and that bad taste will last for an entire generation.

    Starting another war would require a draft and the HYPOCRITES children would have to go, since they are only for war as long as the military is all volunteer, it ain’t happening.


  63. Wayne says:

    we must strive to make sure never gain power in any branches of our government ever again. – TomR

    If the Democrats do not make them pay for their crimes, they or their aprenteces will be back in the white house when the next Repuke gets elected President. 8 to 10years, tops. Mark my words.
    That would be the historical repeat of the last 30-40 years.

    Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
    — Winston Churchill


  64. the republic of stupidity says:

    See, folks, this is why they wrote RICO, so they lock up whole bunches of bad guys all at one time, instead of having to put them away one at a time.

    All these F”blip”king As”blip”oles – ya got them all together in the same room at the same time. You’ve proven relationship. You can now prosecute en masse. Just ask the Mafia if was effective. I don’t see any good reason to not put 40 or 50 at a time away. We don’t want Li’l Scooter to get lonely behind bars, do we?

    That’s what RICO was written for. Hell, ask Rudy. He helped write it!


  65. Wayne says:

    #62 should be 8-12 years, typo (wish they had an edit LOL)


  66. Apple says:

    God! Just look at these people. They’re U-G-L-Y !!!


  67. Juan C says:

    Off topic, but the thread is really slow.

    I love this video.


  68. Madame Defarge says:

  69. Russell B says:

    This should be no surprise. The reason these folks can so readily acknowledge the failure that is Iraq and, in the next (or for Bolton the same) breath promote regime change in [ ] is the fact that they’ve got a useful idiot — Bush.

    The problem isn’t the scheme, but the execution. So they can blame Bush for the Iraq failure and simultaneously claim that the idea is sound.


  70. Gregor Samsa says:

    Obviously, a prerequisite to become a neo-con and a member of the PNAC is to show an almost congenital inability to learn from one’s mistakes, and refusal to take responsibility for them.

    What a scary gathering of sociopaths.


  71. Zooey says:

    Comment by Juan C — May 17, 2007 @ 11:09 pm

    Thanks, Juan.

    I’m sorry, too. I tried. :(


  72. Shane says:

    Where are the trolls who were blasting Michael Moore today for violating rules by going to Cuba? Helloooooo…anything to say now locksteppers?


  73. toasterhead says:

    Ooo yay more regime change! Maybe this time we’ll actually depose a dictator that deserves to be deposed.

    That’s right, Robert Mugabe, you’re going down.

    Please?

    Cause he’s like an actual bad guy. I know they have no natural resources we need and aren’t strategically important but he’s been itching for a deposing for like fifteen years now.


  74. RUCerious says:

    Ponder this. America is in desperate need of instant regime change.
    Impeach Cheney, then Bush, then whoever Bush appoints to replace Cheney.


  75. Juan C says:

    I’m sorry, too. I tried. :(
    Comment by Zooey

    No, you try every day. ;)


  76. JPark says:

    RU, there is not need to impeach Cheney. As soon as they bring articles of impeachment against Bush they will switch VPs to whoever they want to be elected in ‘08.


  77. RUCerious says:

    JPark, that’s not the story I get from Rep Jay Inslee. He really sees no way to impeach without swinging massive public support for Bush.
    I think he’s way overstating the case, but you have a good point, Ghouliani or McPain would probably get the VP and the inside track, but I’m a telling ya it’s the inside track to noWhere!


  78. JPark says:

    RU, I am not saying it would work but there is NO way the Republicans allow Cheney to be president. They would try to give someone an edge in the election. By the way, Jay Inslee is an a$$hole. He swung his stick forcing WA legislators to drop the grassroots impeachment movement. That guy needs to go.


  79. RUCerious says:

    JPark, I missed that act. When did he do that?


  80. Smith says:

    Bolton is the ugly American, the original all the other clones are molded from. Thank God his career is over and he fell in disgrace just like all the other neo-crazies are falling and will fall just like the nazis did before them. We must learn from history and not let humanity allow these cancerous ideologues to rise to power in any country.


  81. JosephW says:

    Bolton’s positions:
    Then, moving briskly to present-day examples, Mr. Bolton backed regime change in North Korea and Iran. As for Cuba, he said that “actuarial tables will take care” of it, referring to the aging Castro. Sudan, he said, was not a sufficient threat to American interests to justify a policy of regime change. Burma, he noted, recently was reported to be entering a contract with Russia for a research nuclear reactor, but “I don’t think that’s a regime that warrants regime change.” Venezuela, he said last year purchased 100,000 AK-47s. “Not yet but maybe” was Mr. Bolton’s position on regime change in Venezuela. Syria is the “hardest” case, Mr. Bolton said, seeming to think that what came after Assad there might be worse.

    Okay, who does Bolton think is going to enact this “regime change” in North Korea? China may not like Pyongyang very much, but there is almost no chance in hell that Beijing will just sit back and allow American troops to cross the 38th Parallel, and the South is highly unlikely to welcome the inevitable consequences of absorbing an extra 23 million people (it’s likely they remember the economic impact when the Federal Republic of Germany absorbed some 18 million East Germans following the *peaceful* re-unification). Japan may also worry that Kim will go crazy enough to launch his nukes the very instant his country’s attacked.
    As for Cuba, the Communists *might* be able to retain power, but I seriously doubt the Cuban people will welcome the “exiles” (especially with that community’s connection to the as-bad-as-Castro Batista regime). I also can’t see the Republicans wanting the Cubans in Miami to return to the island since they’ve been the largest pro-GOP wing of the country’s Hispanic population (though getting rid of those pesky Cubans can help the anti-immigration wing of the GOP since Cubans “fleeing” Castro can get instant political asylum while other Hispanics are deemed little more than “economic” opportunists; getting rid of the Cubans removes the illegal immigration “double standard”). On the other hand, Cuba’s leaders might choose to emulate the Chinese model and keep Cuba a Communist state while allowing for more individual private enterprise.
    Sudan’s not a “sufficient threat” to US interests? Hmm. Is Sudan not the largest country in Africa in area? The country spent a quarter century engaged in a civil war between the majority Muslims in the North and the Black African Christians and animists in the South, and there’s now a major civil war between the Arab Muslims and the Black African Muslims in the country’s western section with that conflict threatening to spill over into neighboring Chad. The country’s Islamist government has hosted Islamic terrorists in the past and it’s not too hard to believe the government would sponsor other Islamist terror groups (hell, the country has been on the State Dep’t’s list of state sponsors of terror since 1993!). Maybe Mr Bolton might want to recall just how “sufficient” a threat Afghanistan was to US interests before 9/11 and rethink his position.
    Burma (Myanmar) is looking to get a “research” nuclear reactor, but that doesn’t concern Bolton? I guess this just lends support to the Iranian position that the US is only acting on behalf of the Israeli lobbyists. Otherwise, why should Iran be censured for its “peaceful” nuclear program while the isolationist authoritarian military government of Myanmar be of no serious concern? By all means, let’s have yet ANOTHER South Asian country have a nuclear program which (according to our Administration officials) takes little effort to turn into a nuclear arms program. (Hasn’t that minimal effort been the Bushies reasoning for being concerned about the Iranian program?)
    Venezuela? Ooooh, they bought some AK-47s. Scary. Please. Until Chavez became the Venezuelan president, Caracas was buying US military hardware and the US didn’t seem to care (in fact, Washington was happy with the arrangement). Chavez decides he doesn’t need Washington (and with the US efforts to destabilize his gov’t, he can’t really be blamed) and does business elsewhere. But just because the Chavez gov’t isn’t liked by the neocons in Washington is no excuse to endorse “regime change”. Venezuela’s had peaceful elections, and it’s been Chavez’s opponents who lost and attempted coups against him (i.e., overturning the “will of the people”). If Washington will stop antagonizing Chavez, there’s much less reason for him to move towards dictatorship.
    Rather surprisingly, in my opinion, Bolton made the only intelligent call in relation to Syria. If only the jerkwad and his neocon allies had put as much thought into a post-Saddam Iraq as he’s apparently done with a post-Assad Syria, we wouldn’t be caught in the quagmire that has developed in Iraq. Experts had warned against any serious efforts to topple Qaddafi for years simply because no one in any of the intelligence communities (not even Israel’s Mossad or the old KGB) had any idea who might succeed Qaddafi from either a peaceful change of power or a coup (”Better the devil you know” and all that).


  82. Damian says:

    Bolton’s picture = cartoon.

    With Boltonstache, my right arm has this urge to tense, straighten, and shoot upward for some reason while I shout something in German.

    And I don’t even know German except for…


  83. Shirley says:

    If anyone has doubted who the leading warmongers have tur ed out to be, those truly behind the philosophical and political manipulations and underpinnings of the current monstrous nature of the Once Great American republic, they need no further proof. They are the J e w i s h Z i o n i s t Neo-conservatives.


  84. Shirley says:

    Progress, folks, is about the equitable redistribution of resources, the improvement of the mass population ECONOMICALLY. It isn’t about allowing an ethnic minority, in the American case, the Z i o n i s t cabal to have unlimited power and wealth.
    Think Progress should start running some more stories about who owns what and why…


  85. deport neocon filth says:

    did they give their favorite gay porn star/whore matt sanchez an award at this soiree? this story only serves to highlight what is already known about neocon scum: party over country


  86. Perry Logan says:

    They seem unaware they have single-handedly destroyed the Republican Party.


  87. DM says:

    #80 ~ The death of Castro won’t change Cuba. Mao’s been gone for over 30 years and China is still China.


  88. Rachel says:

    I was thinking it seems like there’s just one political scandal after another around here. Scooter to Gonzales…yeesh. Anyway I stumbled upon this list of the political scandals that have occurred just since 2000. Man, will it ever end.
    http://listafterlist.com/tabid/57/listid/6556//Political+Scandals+This+Decade.aspx


  89. Lee says:

    “Ooo yay more regime change! Maybe this time we’ll actually depose a dictator that deserves to be deposed.

    That’s right, Robert Mugabe, you’re going down.”

    We won’t be deposing Mugabe of power. His country doesn’t have any oil. Isn’t it ironic that the U.S. declares a “global war on terror”, yet we’ve only been hanging out in the oil rich middle east?


  90. Kate Henry says:

    These people are very scary. We need a complete and total Democratic victory so that we can stop these people and take back our country.


  91. Eric says:

    “The failed neoconservative designs on Iraq do not appear to have quenched their desire to continue their global regime change campaign.”

    Uh, last time I checked TP, both Iraq and Afghanistan had very successful regime changes. Saddam was hung and the Taliban heads either ran like pussies or were killed. Shortly thereafter, Muammar Khadafi from Libya came very clean and Libya was taken off the terrorist nation list. Kim Jung Il, the other leg in the axis of evil stool, had come to the bargaining table and will soon reach a deal. Korea should be reunited within a very short time when the North can’t feed it’s own anymore. Syria and Iran are sweating bullets right now and there is a strong moderate movement in Iran that is rebelling against the ultra conservative regime there.

    Political Science is always prone to difficulties but the isolationist, Neville Chamberlain style of TP and those on this board have never worked and only cost more lives in the long run. History proves it time and time again. You pay now or you pay a lot more later. Luckily, we have a couple of countries left that will support our foreign policies to eliminate threats before they occur. Cowards with weak stomachs try to influence world opinion that any action is bad. We need to just sit on our ass and pretend the world threats aren’t there. They even deny an islamic war being declared on America. It must really suck being on the side of Neville Chamberlain and Jane Fonda. Please read your history books so you don’t continue to make the same mistakes over again.


  92. Anon says:

    Putting aside the important issue of legality/illegailty of pre-emptive war and Geneva requiring an imminent threat: Where are the resources going to come from to support regieme change in Korea; and given the debacled-planning in Iraq, why believe the plans to change regiemes elsewhere are credible; and what is to stop other nations from uniting to do the same to the US?


  93. Shirley says:

    #89 These people are very scary. We need a complete and total Democratic victory so that we can stop these people and take back our country.Comment by Kate Henry

    And what makes you think the Democratic party will do anything substantively different than what Bush’s Zionist Cabal Party has been doing? The Democrats destroyed the plans of Pelosi to put a TRUE anti-war Hero in the number two spot when they dumped John Murtha. In his place we got Steny Hoyer, described on many Jewish websites as Israel’s best friend in Congress. And in case anyone had missed this little fact, most Israelis and American Zionists are ENTIRELY behind the murder of the Arabs in what was once Iraq. BTW Kissinger noted in a speech some time back that Iraq no longer exists as a country. You folks need to wake up as to whom is running the show, and the RealPolitik as it now stands.


  94. Shirley says:

    Put pressure on China and you will see regime change in Korea. Simply block the one-way shipment of Chinese crap as they did during the Longshoremen’s lockout, and you’ll sufficiently disturb the Chinese into putting more pressure of Korea. But the question remains one of Why? Why should ANY AMERICAN care what is happening in Korea when OUR OWN TREASURY IS BEING ROBBED BY OUR CURRENT RULING JUNTA!?


  95. NoOneYouKnow says:

    What the hell kind of damage is Venezuela going to do with 100,000 AKMs? When most countries buy small arms, it doesn’t end up in the press or as a talking point. Once again, they’re after the oil.


  96. Eric says:

    Wow!!!! I knew I was right, but I didn’t think it would be announced this quickly……

    Just in: N.Korea ready to sign denuclearization treaty and US to officially end Korean War.

    My comments on #91 seem pretty clairvoyant.

    Here is the link:

    http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2007/ss_nkorea_05_18.asp

    I’ll have a nice weekend knowing I nailed it. Let’s see how the libs spin this into negative news somehow. When US Policy is given time to work, it’s amazing what can happen. Another positive result of great US Policy for regime change in Iraq. Keep up the great work Condoleeza! Iran regime change is next.


  97. Eric says:


Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll