Think Progress

Coburn Confident That Gonzales Should Resign, But Won’t Support ‘No Confidence’ Vote

coburn.jpgWhen Attorney General Alberto Gonzales first testified to Congress about the U.S. attorney scandal on April 19, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) reacted with indignation, telling Gonzales that “the best way to put this behind us is your resignation.”

But now, despite the variety of reasons for Gonzales to resign, Coburn appears to have backed away from his stern approach to Gonzales. Asked today whether Coburn would support a vote of “no confidence” for Gonzales, Coburn’s spokesman John Hart said no, calling the measure “a silly partisan stunt.” Hart said:

However, some Republican senators who have called on Mr. Gonzales to resign said they would not vote for Mr. Schumer’s no-confidence measure.

If that were brought to the floor, I think Dr. Coburn would bring a vote to the floor calling for a vote of no confidence in Congress’ ability to balance the budget,” said John Hart, spokesman for Sen. Tom Coburn, Oklahoma Republican.

Mr. Coburn told Mr. Gonzales in a public hearing last month that the attorney general should resign, but Mr. Hart said the senator thinks Mr. Schumer’s no-confidence measure is “a silly partisan stunt.”

If Sen. Coburn really had the courage of his conviction that “the best way to put this behind us” is for Gonzales to resign, then he would support the “no confidence” vote, which is a reasonable move towards creating a Gonzales-free Justice Department.

Digg It!



68 Responses to “Coburn Confident That Gonzales Should Resign, But Won’t Support ‘No Confidence’ Vote”

  1. Punchy says:

    Color me surprised. Every single Republican is all talk, no action. I call it Hagel-ing.


  2. Bluedog49 says:

    Unfortunately, there’s really nothing that can be done about Coburn because evidently the majority of voters in Oklahoma are morons.


  3. AlphaLiberal says:

    Maybe Sen Coburn actually does have confidence in Gonzo.


  4. stopthecons says:

    why would one mafia member REALLY do anything more than talk the talk? He’ll never support resignation or anything else unless his own hide is on the line.


  5. hellinabucket says:

    At least he’s honest about being spineless. Can’t put his vote where his mouth is though.


  6. klyde says:

    Party > Nation

    The rethug mantra!


  7. marcus robinson says:

    Typical republican. Can’t tell right from wrong.


  8. Wayne says:

    I want Gonzo to resign, but he and every lawbreaker in the administration needs to face a judge and jury for the crimes against the people and the world commited by these thugs


  9. TripMaster Monkey says:

    Par for the course. Loudly state an opinion in public, then quietly vote the opposite way.


  10. WilliamR says:

    I think that a “no confidence” vote is a wishy-washy move. The man has LIED to Congress repeatedly. It is time to impeach him.


  11. Zooey says:

    “If Sen. Coburn really had the courage of his conviction….”

    Sorry Matt, I had to stop reading there since I was laughing so hard. I think I hurt myself….

    The only conviction Coburn holds near and dear to his heart, is his great unwashed fantasy of rampant lesbianism in Oklahoma school bathrooms.


  12. Lee says:

    That’s twice in 24 hours that Coburn has pissed me off with his a**hole bullsh*t.

    F*cking gutless weasel.


  13. james k. sayre says:

    Gee, another GOP pussy… what a surprise, when push comes to shove, the GOP just goose-steps right along with the Bush crime family…
    Off topic, but where is a TP posting on the Kennedy immigration great sellout to corporate America?
    The United States Senate has not been willing to secure our southern border in the last twenty, thirty or forty years. The Senate has not been willing to enforce current laws against corporations hiring illegal immigrants in the last twenty, thirty or forty years.

    More recently, the Senate has not been willing to set up a universal single-payer health insurance system. The Senate has been unwilling to allow hand-counted paper ballots in our elections. The Senate has been unwilling to end our illegal criminal imperial occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq. The Senate has been unwilling to Impeach, Try, Convict and Remove the lying, war-mongering, election-stealing traitorous Cheney and Bush from their Offices.
    Yet, the U. S. Senate is willing to grant a blanket amnesty to some twelve-to-twenty million illegal immigrants. No problemo… Senators seem to be just — corporate whores.


  14. VerbalKint says:

    These Republicans are cowards beyond all belief, as are their dimwitted supporters.


  15. War4Sale says:

    And Coburn’s refusal to vote his conscience is silly partisan cowardice.


  16. Briseadh na Faire says:

    “I think he should resign…but I have confidence in him!”

    /J. Stewart…


  17. Lee says:

    #6

    Party > Nation

    The rethug mantra!

    I agree. The core repug mindset. Worthless bastards. Every last one of them. For the last seven years of kissing Chimpy’s ass, they should all be removed from office. The rethugs are a disgrace to everything they molest (ie, the Constitution, religion, our military).

    Off topic, but one has to ask:

    Hey Jerry, how is your roasting in hell going?!


  18. Tom3 says:

    Repukes put party over country. They are all traitors.

    Too bad we can’t shoot ‘em.


  19. Briseadh na Faire says:

    Let’s impeach him. And during the Senate Trial, use his approved “coercive interrogation techniques” on him!


  20. Tom3 says:

    Arlen Sphincter does the same bullshit.

    He talks tough but when push comes to shove, he wimps out and votes with the rest of the Repukes.

    Repukes are crooks and traitors. They must be removed from office.


  21. Jerry Falwell says:

    Dang, its HOT down here!!

    MMMMMM…something’s cooking.

    Wait…that’s ME!! AAARRRRRGHHH!!!


  22. TripMaster Monkey says:

    Tom3 sez:

    Repukes put party over country. They are all traitors.

    Too bad we can’t shoot ‘em.

    Oh, but we can, when we convict them of treason…


  23. KRank says:

    Man, Oklahoma sure has A LOT to be proud of in their representation in the US Senate, don’t they?

    Coburn – Inhofe. Is there a better one-two punch of sheer buffoonery from any one state in the nation?


  24. cosmosis says:

    Back off Crazy Tom! He has more important things to do like search for lesbians in high school restrooms.


  25. LandSurveyor says:

  26. powkat says:

    Okay – anyone who is surprised that a red-state Republican talks out of both sides of his mouth (not to mention another orifice) say, “Aye.”

    Chirp, chirp, chirp, chrip . . . . . . . . . . .


  27. DM says:

    I told my boss that I’m not coming to work on Monday because “timetables sent the wrong message” to customers. He said that he had “no confidence” that my job would be here on Tuesday if I did, and I told him to take his “partisan stunt” and shove it.

    That’ll show him.


  28. Chuck U. Farley says:

    Are Davy Crockett caps back in style?


  29. mongo says:

    I don’t think republic party members of congress ought to be bringing up the subject of “balanced budget” after their embarrassing turn in the majority and their complicit (with the white house) destruction of history’s largest budget surplus into its largest deficit.


  30. Tom3 says:

    Jeez, this guy looks like another Reperv.

    No wonder he fantasizes about lesbians in the girls locker room.

    Another Mark Foley type, no doubt.


  31. xenon says:

    Typical Republican manoeuvre: why strive for a complete solution when half-measures will do?


  32. Ethiolib says:

    See, that’s why we will not have impeachment. These bastards can never be trusted. Would you trust a man like Coburn to sponsor Bush’s impeachment, if you can’t trust him with this? Bastards!


  33. leftcoast says:

    Why must everything boil down to this same old childish B.S. of , Ooh, mommy, he’s being partisan.” “Oooh, if he does that again, mommy, will you beat him up for me?” Coburn’s remarks are borinly childish.


  34. poconojoe says:

    Me thinks they were paid a little threatning visit by Shotgun Cheney…


  35. jrod says:

    Sounds like Karl got some dirt on Sen. Coburn from one of the warrantless NSA wiretaps and is holding his feet to the fire now to tow the WH line.


  36. FreedomFirst says:

    I think we should use the constitution that they all werer sworn to protect. This is not a Parliamentary democracy we do not hold no-confidence votes. We need to have the spine to impeach this man. The Attorney General needs to be impeached for trying to use the Justice department as a wing of the Republican party attack machine. Lets get real and have Congress act like with their constitution authority and responsibility.


  37. Tom3 says:

    Good point, Ethiolib.

    Pelosi knows this. That’s why she took it off the table.

    I would love to see Chimpeachment, but we don’t have the votes.

    We would need 20% of the Repukes to vote for it.

    And Repukes prove time and again that they are liars. They talk tough against Chimpy but when push comes to shove, they support him.

    Sorry, but Chimpeachment is still off the table. Unfortuately, we don’t have the votes.


  38. tarazan says:

    No divorce….But Seperation.


  39. Namtillaku says:

    Same old story – spineless congress.


  40. leftcoast says:

    #36-Lets get real and have Congress act like with their constitution authority and responsibility.Comment by FreedomFirst
    Oh, if it were only possible. Our leaders no longer listen to their constinuents. Its all about raising cash for the next election. The government is a toy in the hands of the corporate giants.


  41. Tom3 says:

    Sounds like Karl got some dirt on Sen. Coburn from one of the warrantless NSA wiretaps and is holding his feet to the fire now to tow the WH line. – Comment by jrod

    That would explain his quick switch. It would also explain why Arlen Sphincter has backed off several times in the past.

    And it would explain why the surveillance program was so bad, even Ashcroft wouldn’t sign it. And Ashcroft was the one who pushed the Patriot Act.


  42. Pete Bogs says:

    again, there are no teeth in their objections… just like they refuse to vote for Iraq resolutions…. more of this non-binding, ineffectual crap…


  43. leftcoast says:

    Tom3. Impeachment may not get the votes, but it is congress’ responsibility to act when crimes are committed. So, the need to stand up and be counted even if impeachment does not go all the way. Its about putting faith back in our government, or have anarchy.


  44. Katie says:

    Mr. Coburn is nothing but an ass licking Republic. That’s fine by me because it will pretty much guarantee he won’t be reelected in 2008. I just can’t believe how far these Republics will go to stay in lock-step with each other. I read something the other day that said that the Democrats were working in lock-step and I almost spewed my coffee on my computer screen. The Democrats are so far out of lock-step they are continually in disarray. But, I would rather have Democrats in disarray because they can think for themselves and make decisions based on their true beliefs than I would to have Republics who always make the same decisions no matter what they truly think. That’s those rubber-stamp Republics.

    I can hardly wait until 2008. It will be a Democratic cakewalk and a Republic blood-bath and one that is well earned.


  45. DM says:

    AGAIN…

    Impeachment is done in the House. It requires a simple majority.
    Removal is done in the Senate, and it requires two-thirds.


  46. Tom3 says:

    The problem with impeachment is that if the Senate fails to remove Chimpy from office (after the House Chimpeaches him) then Chimpy is exonerated of all charges. Its in the Constitution, iirc.

    We cannot risk taking Chimpy to trial unless we can nail him. If he gets exonerated, we will never hear the end of it. And it will embolden the Repukes to keep destroying our great nation.


  47. Pete Bogs says:

    it’s a “stunt” that may be necessary, should Gonzo fail to do the right thing…


  48. the Lone Voice of Reason says:

    DM it’s not just the republicans that say one thing and do another, impeachment won’t happen.


  49. FreedomFirst says:

    Comment by DM True. So their are the votes for it in the House. Gonzales will be impeached and that would make a stroner point than some bs no-confidence vote. We have a constitution and we need to use it!

    If Congress refuses to respect the constitution then we truely have no government anymore.


  50. FreedomFirst says:

    Tom3 – Most people don’t see Clinto as being exonerated of anything. At least in the trial in the Senate it would more difficult for the White House to claim executive priviledge and more evidens of how much the WH tried to trun the Justice department into the Repub party will come out and will hurt the repubs


  51. CONservative says:

    “Arlen Sphincter does the same bullshit.

    He talks tough but when push comes to shove, he wimps out and votes with the rest of the Repukes.

    Repukes are crooks and traitors. They must be removed from office.”

    Comment by Tom3 — May 18, 2007 @ 2:40 pm

    Coming from AZ, I can say the same for John ‘Straight Talk Express My @$$’ McCain!

    “Man, Oklahoma sure has A LOT to be proud of in their representation in the US Senate, don’t they?

    Coburn – Inhofe. Is there a better one-two punch of sheer buffoonery from any one state in the nation?”

    Comment by KRank — May 18, 2007 @ 2:47 pm

    Don’t know if it’s a ‘better’ combo (or worse depending on one’s perspective), but I nominate the aforementioned Straight Talk Express My @$$ and Jon ‘Rubberstamp’ Kyl, our bookend jack@$$ senators from AZ. If we’re counting the House too then Rick Renzi and Kyl would easily give Coburn and Inhofe a run for their money!


  52. Mr. Bush Goes To Hell says:

    We DO have the votes for IMPEACHMENT (bringing to TRIAL) in the House…

    At this point, we DON’T have the votes to CONVICT Bush (neither did the Rapeublican Senate to Clinton).

    But IMPEACHMENT would cause the FACTS to have to be EXPOSED: that Bush and Cheney are WAR CRIMINALS, subverters of the Constitution, and TREASONOUS exposers of our SPIES…

    And the American public would soon be outraged enough to get the goose-steppers to vote for CONVICTION.

    So, yes, we DO have sufficient votes for IMPEACHMENT in the HOUSE.

    These EVIL CRIMINALS deserve it for doing what they have done…

    See YOU in hell Coburn (cause I’LL be THERE),

    Mr. Bush
    MURDEROUS WAR CRIMINAL
    COWARDLY TRAITOR TO THE USA (TM–BushCrimeCo, Inc.)


  53. Peter says:

    I agree with leftcoast (43). It is time to make all the 28-percenters and their Congressional conspirators stand up and explain why Bush’s actions are acceptable – why lies may be used to start a war, why treaties banning torture should be disregarded, why laws specifying the limits to government evesdropping during war may be waived with an authorization to use force, why American citizens may be imprisoned and tortured without access to the legal system, why laws banning propaganda may be disregarded, and on and on and on.

    These things cannot be acceptable, and anyone who thinks they are needs to be exposed. Impeachment may not succeed; the Republicans in the Senate might hold firm and put party over country, but they must be made to stand up and do so in full view of all, and then pay the consequences.


  54. billjpa says:

    so once again the “will” of the people will be disregarded. The only answer that will cause the goopers to wake up will be a route in 08. A total and complete route.
    The dems should simply gather and then bring forward a complete list of every single example of the gooper criminal behavior. The lying, the misleading, the total disregard for the welfare of the people in this country. They, the dems will have to get the info out to the folks using every single method that there is. If they can’t get the MSM to publish it then they will have to enlist the web, the volunteers on the ground, the old fashioned door to door methods, the use of posters and billboards and the use, if necessary of non- violent obstruction of the congressional actions.
    The people have to get the message. They just have to and these liars that constitute the gooper members of the congress appear to be owned lock stock and barrel.
    the alternative is too horrible to accept.


  55. Mr. Bush Goes To Hell says:

    Also, impeachment would GUARANTEE that BushCrimeCo, Inc. would have

    to produce the REQUESTED material, or risk Obstruction and Contempt of Congress.

    They are IN CONTEMPT right now (DOJ and State), but until there are TEETH put into ENFORCING the LAW on these CRIMINALS, …

    IMPEACHMENT is the “TEETH” needed.


  56. rfinca says:

    This is just more of the same. republicans talk a good game, but when it comes to backing up what they say they fall like a house of cards.


  57. Merlin says:

    #33 Comment by leftcoast — May 18, 2007 @ 3:02 pm
    Why must everything boil down to this same old childish B.S. of , Ooh, mommy, he’s being partisan.” “Oooh, if he does that again, mommy, will you beat him up for me?” Coburn’s remarks are borinly childish.

    This answer by Hart, “a silly partisan stunt,” sounds stupid and childish to us, but sadly, not to the the American public who does not keep up with politics on a daily basis. They can’t tell the truth from lying because they don’t know the facts.

    This “partisan” tactic is part of the very effective “framing” the rethugs have developed over the last 30 years. They do it because it has always worked with the American public.

    It essentially says that the facts we Democrats present, are not important, because we are being childish (partisan) in talking as we do. The MSM backs them and repeats this over and over “so it must be true.” “Democrats are just playing politics, so don’t listen to them,” they say. “You just hate Bush” (they say, ” its just another partisan attack, but we are smart enough to recognize it, and it doesn’t bother us. And they imply, “look at how big we are! We don’t get angry, we just take it in stride.” The MSM nods sagely and the public goes right along.) The ‘hate Bush’ bit is just another variation on this ‘partisan theme.’

    We progressives have a lot to do, to learn how to reframe our approach so that these kinds of attacks don’t work any more.


  58. Charlie H says:

    I can’t stop laughing at “Arlen Sphincter”. That is beautiful.


  59. yellowdogD says:

    Zooey @11

    You must be from OK. I didn’t think many people outside the state knew about the raging lesbianism at Idabel, OK. snark


  60. lunacy says:

    No, of course not. Why go on public record in Congress with a vote FOR ‘no confidence’. This way, he can deny ever having said he thinks Gonzales should resign. He would just has to invoke the ‘I don’t recall’ amendment of the Constitution.


  61. kasinca says:

    Nobody in the rubbernecked party will ever put the country above their allegiance to the Fascist Party they are part of. These are the most useless individuals this country has ever produced. They are failures at every turn, they are crooks at every turn, and most of all they are chickenshit chickenhawk warmongers who have never, ever, served their country. The GOP the anti-America party. But, they are against abortion and gays. What a worthless bunch of losers. The GOP is so over!


  62. Zooey says:

    Zooey @11
    You must be from OK. I didn’t think many people outside the state knew about the raging lesbianism at Idabel, OK. snark
    Comment by yellowdogD

    No, I’m in Idaho. Some things just don’t leave the brain — even if you want them to. :D


  63. OutSourced says:

    Coburn’s a gutless worm. He’d rather keep his country saddled with a govt chief lawyer who’s incompetent and corrupt rather than confront his President with reality or his lawlessness, or confront the RNC with anything but rote compliance with Rovian norms. Coburn’s not a politician, he’s a plastic puppet.


  64. big papa says:

    INBRED DEMONS…

    …DUHmerikkka’s full of ‘em…


  65. Patrick says:

    Coburn is 50% of the reason I moved out of Oklahoma…the other half is Inhofe.

    Voters in OK should be ashamed of themselves. I would wager given the same choices today they would vote them in again.


  66. AlanDownunder says:

    Coburn was hot on oil-for-food scandals when it involved the UN and Australia. Now that Chevron under Rice’s directorship is as implicated (as AWB/Australia) or more implicated (than Annan/UN), where is Coburn on the subject of Rice? In fact, where is anybody?

    A new cause almost daily to prosecute or impeach one or or other of Bush and his poseurs, but the GOP edifice still stands. But then they took care of the foundations. The benches are stacked, the DoJ is infiltrated, and there’s still enough Coburns on the hill to block impeachments. Not to mention the capital M Media. Fathomlessly bizarre times, these.


  67. BK says:

  68. Tobey Tall says:


Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll