<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ThinkFast: May 21, 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:36:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kilo</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3815192</link>
		<dc:creator>Kilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 08:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3815192</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;â€œSince the British military began allowing homosexuals to serve in the armed forces in 2000, none of its fears â€” have come to pass. â€¦ The biggest news about the policy, they say, is that there is no news. It has for the most part become a nonissue.â€&lt;/strong&gt;

I guess this is saying &quot;Pity the US is different from Britain when it comes to the same issue&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>â€œSince the British military began allowing homosexuals to serve in the armed forces in 2000, none of its fears â€” have come to pass. â€¦ The biggest news about the policy, they say, is that there is no news. It has for the most part become a nonissue.â€</strong></p>
<p>I guess this is saying &#8220;Pity the US is different from Britain when it comes to the same issue&#8221;.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3815192', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocks911</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813742</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocks911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 17:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813742</guid>
		<description>Tobey Tall,

Where did you find the information about states banning t-shirt designs?

I&#039;ve tried to have a t-shirt printed with the Third Reich&#039;s symbol and the words &quot;mission Accomplished&quot; but nobody will touch it.

Is this still America?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tobey Tall,</p>
<p>Where did you find the information about states banning t-shirt designs?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried to have a t-shirt printed with the Third Reich&#8217;s symbol and the words &#8220;mission Accomplished&#8221; but nobody will touch it.</p>
<p>Is this still America?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813742', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813568</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813568</guid>
		<description>8 death&#039;s on the Gaza strip by Israel attack&#039;s....Why isn&#039;t any of this ever mentioned,?.....Blessings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8 death&#8217;s on the Gaza strip by Israel attack&#8217;s&#8230;.Why isn&#8217;t any of this ever mentioned,?&#8230;..Blessings<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813568', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813565</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813565</guid>
		<description>Since very early in this administration I have had my doubts about what is and is not reality based.  Now with each new day we get more and more revelations about how the justice department was politicized, how our intelligence gathering capabilities have been politicized, it seems everything this administration has done has been done with the goal of pushing republican politics and enhancing the republican party.  It makes me wonder if there has been any truth to anything they have put out?  A sort of boy who cried wolf scenario.

What have they given us that we can trust?  Have any actions by the justice department been valid?  Or have they all been geared towards furthering the political aims of the republican party?  We know that at least for the last few years, this has been the case.  Was Ashcroft fired for not signing off on the NSA spying?  I would bet that he was.  They say that the program is dead, but who really believes that it is being run in any manner other than the way they originally conceived it to run?  And now that we know how fully they politicize everything, who thinks that they only target those suspected of terrorism and terrorist ties?  Since day one I have thought that they used the program more to track political opponents, be they democrats, reporters who write unfavorable stories or private citizens who don&#039;t side with them.

What other information and departments have been politicized?  Are any economic figures untainted?  Why would they not try to influence the economy.  On a manufacturing level I don&#039;t see the economy growing the way they say it has.  Has this information been politicized?

At this point I have to be skeptical of everything they put out.  If they say it is 12:00pm I will check my watch.  If they say the sky is blue I must look up.  If they say anything I am afraid I will have to verify this myself because they lost my trust and confidence long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since very early in this administration I have had my doubts about what is and is not reality based.  Now with each new day we get more and more revelations about how the justice department was politicized, how our intelligence gathering capabilities have been politicized, it seems everything this administration has done has been done with the goal of pushing republican politics and enhancing the republican party.  It makes me wonder if there has been any truth to anything they have put out?  A sort of boy who cried wolf scenario.</p>
<p>What have they given us that we can trust?  Have any actions by the justice department been valid?  Or have they all been geared towards furthering the political aims of the republican party?  We know that at least for the last few years, this has been the case.  Was Ashcroft fired for not signing off on the NSA spying?  I would bet that he was.  They say that the program is dead, but who really believes that it is being run in any manner other than the way they originally conceived it to run?  And now that we know how fully they politicize everything, who thinks that they only target those suspected of terrorism and terrorist ties?  Since day one I have thought that they used the program more to track political opponents, be they democrats, reporters who write unfavorable stories or private citizens who don&#8217;t side with them.</p>
<p>What other information and departments have been politicized?  Are any economic figures untainted?  Why would they not try to influence the economy.  On a manufacturing level I don&#8217;t see the economy growing the way they say it has.  Has this information been politicized?</p>
<p>At this point I have to be skeptical of everything they put out.  If they say it is 12:00pm I will check my watch.  If they say the sky is blue I must look up.  If they say anything I am afraid I will have to verify this myself because they lost my trust and confidence long ago.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813565', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: impeachcheneythenbush</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813557</link>
		<dc:creator>impeachcheneythenbush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813557</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;#

Nice TMonk #9 itâ€™s obvious theyâ€™re trying to move us in a certain direction. Good work.

Comment by the Lone Voice of Reason â€” May 21, 2007 @ 10:14 am
&lt;/em&gt;

I completely agree.  I&#039;ve thought for a long time now that the &quot;incompetency&quot; label was one that was more than acceptable to the Bush administration.  It allowed them to hide what their true goals are.  It also allowed them to put into &quot;power&quot; a person who is extraordinarily ambitious, vicious and totally irresponsible, while being intellectually lacking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>#</p>
<p>Nice TMonk #9 itâ€™s obvious theyâ€™re trying to move us in a certain direction. Good work.</p>
<p>Comment by the Lone Voice of Reason â€” May 21, 2007 @ 10:14 am<br />
</em></p>
<p>I completely agree.  I&#8217;ve thought for a long time now that the &#8220;incompetency&#8221; label was one that was more than acceptable to the Bush administration.  It allowed them to hide what their true goals are.  It also allowed them to put into &#8220;power&#8221; a person who is extraordinarily ambitious, vicious and totally irresponsible, while being intellectually lacking.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813557', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris L</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813535</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813535</guid>
		<description>&quot;Incoming Prime Minister Gordon Brown reportedly plans to cut British troop numbers in Iraq from 7,000 to 2,000 over the next 12 months, and have all troops removed by spring 2008.&quot;

TP, this is a misprint.  It should read &quot;spring of 2010&quot;, as it does in the linked article.  After all, 12 months from now will be the summer of 2008. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Incoming Prime Minister Gordon Brown reportedly plans to cut British troop numbers in Iraq from 7,000 to 2,000 over the next 12 months, and have all troops removed by spring 2008.&#8221;</p>
<p>TP, this is a misprint.  It should read &#8220;spring of 2010&#8243;, as it does in the linked article.  After all, 12 months from now will be the summer of 2008. :-)<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813535', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proud Dem</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813511</link>
		<dc:creator>Proud Dem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813511</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The biggest news about the policy, they say, is that there is no news. It has for the most part become a nonissue.â€&lt;/em&gt;

It &lt;strong&gt;should&lt;/strong&gt; be a nonissue.  The issue is that thousands of young men and women have died needlessly in a war fabricated by the neocons and the oil agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The biggest news about the policy, they say, is that there is no news. It has for the most part become a nonissue.â€</em></p>
<p>It <strong>should</strong> be a nonissue.  The issue is that thousands of young men and women have died needlessly in a war fabricated by the neocons and the oil agenda.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813511', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Lone Voice of Reason</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813452</link>
		<dc:creator>the Lone Voice of Reason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813452</guid>
		<description>Nice TMonk #9 it&#039;s obvious they&#039;re trying to move us in a certain direction. Good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice TMonk #9 it&#8217;s obvious they&#8217;re trying to move us in a certain direction. Good work.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813452', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erroll</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813448</link>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813448</guid>
		<description>&quot;Officials continue to scour for bipartisan solutions to salvage the American entanglement in Iraq.&quot; This morning on NPR, a report focused on a meeting that took place between one of the American generals and Congress. Senator Byrd asked the general if the U.S. military had made any plans to withdraw all of the troops from Iraq. The general said that there were no published reports on removing the troops from Iraq. The NPR reporter noted that the key word in the general&#039;s statement was published. The reporter believed that the U.S. intends to station at least 30,000 troops in Iraq for the next thirty years with the primary reason being Iraq&#039;s oil supply. This begs the question: if the NPR reporter was able to make this judgment why did no senator press the general on this matter? So much for Congress making sure that the military-industrial complex is kept in check and that more American troops are kept unnecessarily out of harm&#039;s way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Officials continue to scour for bipartisan solutions to salvage the American entanglement in Iraq.&#8221; This morning on NPR, a report focused on a meeting that took place between one of the American generals and Congress. Senator Byrd asked the general if the U.S. military had made any plans to withdraw all of the troops from Iraq. The general said that there were no published reports on removing the troops from Iraq. The NPR reporter noted that the key word in the general&#8217;s statement was published. The reporter believed that the U.S. intends to station at least 30,000 troops in Iraq for the next thirty years with the primary reason being Iraq&#8217;s oil supply. This begs the question: if the NPR reporter was able to make this judgment why did no senator press the general on this matter? So much for Congress making sure that the military-industrial complex is kept in check and that more American troops are kept unnecessarily out of harm&#8217;s way.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813448', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Briseadh na Faire</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813423</link>
		<dc:creator>Briseadh na Faire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813423</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;em&gt; The two assessments, titled &quot;Principal Challenges in Post-Saddam Iraq&quot; and &quot;Regional Consequences of Regime Change in Iraq,&quot; were produced by the National Intelligence Council (NIC) and will be a major part of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence&#039;s long-awaited Phase II report on prewar intelligence assessments about Iraq. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;  

And there were the Army War College Reports, beginning in October 2002.

http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB182.pdf

Bush &amp; Company knew, but it&#039;s damn hard to loot a country when it has a stable and functioning government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> <em> The two assessments, titled &#8220;Principal Challenges in Post-Saddam Iraq&#8221; and &#8220;Regional Consequences of Regime Change in Iraq,&#8221; were produced by the National Intelligence Council (NIC) and will be a major part of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence&#8217;s long-awaited Phase II report on prewar intelligence assessments about Iraq. </em></p></blockquote>
<p>And there were the Army War College Reports, beginning in October 2002.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB182.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB182.pdf</a></p>
<p>Bush &amp; Company knew, but it&#8217;s damn hard to loot a country when it has a stable and functioning government.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813423', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Randal</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813421</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Randal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813421</guid>
		<description>LOL Prince Harry is probably Gay, so British had to allow Gays into the military. For the moment Gays in the US would be wise to NOT join up till Bush is gone from office. Soldiers are just used as cannon fodder by Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL Prince Harry is probably Gay, so British had to allow Gays into the military. For the moment Gays in the US would be wise to NOT join up till Bush is gone from office. Soldiers are just used as cannon fodder by Bush.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813421', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobey Tall</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813419</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobey Tall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813419</guid>
		<description>The Incredible Vanishing Iraqi Political Leadership:  Al-Hakim to Iran ??????????????

&lt;b&gt;Abdul Aziz al-Hakim has chosen to seek chemotherapy for his lung cancer in Iran rather than in the US. &lt;/b&gt;His condition was confirmed during a visit to a hospital in Houston this weekend. He is likely to be absent from Iraq in Iran for several months, and says he is going there so as to be closer to his family than he would be in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Incredible Vanishing Iraqi Political Leadership:  Al-Hakim to Iran ??????????????</p>
<p><b>Abdul Aziz al-Hakim has chosen to seek chemotherapy for his lung cancer in Iran rather than in the US. </b>His condition was confirmed during a visit to a hospital in Houston this weekend. He is likely to be absent from Iraq in Iran for several months, and says he is going there so as to be closer to his family than he would be in the US.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813419', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TripMaster Monkey</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813418</link>
		<dc:creator>TripMaster Monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813418</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;â€œTwo intelligence assessments from January 2003 predicted that the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and subsequent U.S. occupation of Iraq could lead to internal violence and provide a boost to Islamic extremists and terrorists in the region.â€ They will be released as part of the â€œPhase IIâ€ Senate report on pre-war intelligence.&lt;/i&gt;

Funny how &lt;b&gt;EVERYONE&lt;/b&gt; seemed to know just what the consequences of this disastrous invasion and occupation would be, before it was even started.

Ask yourself: Could &lt;i&gt;any administration be &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;so&lt;/i&gt; clueless as to &lt;i&gt;honestly&lt;/i&gt; think this would have gone well, despite the massive amount of information pointing solidly to the opposite conclusion?

Many people like to talk about how incompetent this administration is.  The reality, however, is that this administration is one of the &lt;i&gt;most&lt;/i&gt; competent we&#039;ve ever seen...look at all they&#039;ve managed to accomplish in just six short years:

&lt;blockquote&gt;

# Centralizing power within the executive branch to an unprecedented degree
# Starting two major wars, one started with questionable intelligence and in a manner with which the military disagreed
# Placing on the Supreme Court two far-right justices, and stacking the lower federal courts with many more
# Cutting taxes during wartime, an unprecedented event
# Passing a number of controversial bills such as the PATRIOT Act, the No Child Left Behind Act, the Medicare Drug bill, the Bankruptcy bill and a number of massive tax cuts
# Rolling back and refusing to enforce a host of basic regulatory protections
# Appointing industry officials to oversee regulatory agencies
# Establishing a greater role for religion through faith-based initiatives
# Passing Orwellian-titled legislation assaulting the environment â€” â€œThe Healthy Forests Actâ€ and the â€œClear Skies Initiativeâ€ â€” to deforest public lands, and put more pollution in our skies 
# (etc., etc., etc.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;em&gt;(List courtesy of the Rockridge Institute.)&lt;/em&gt;

It&#039;s no secret that this administration lies to the American people, but the best lie they ever told...and one that is still blindly accepted as truth, is that their real goals are identical to their stated goals, and any failure to accomplish their stated goals is due to incompetence, rather than the simple reason that their actual goals - the ones they are having no trouble accomplishing - are fundamentally at odds with their stated goals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>â€œTwo intelligence assessments from January 2003 predicted that the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and subsequent U.S. occupation of Iraq could lead to internal violence and provide a boost to Islamic extremists and terrorists in the region.â€ They will be released as part of the â€œPhase IIâ€ Senate report on pre-war intelligence.</i></p>
<p>Funny how <b>EVERYONE</b> seemed to know just what the consequences of this disastrous invasion and occupation would be, before it was even started.</p>
<p>Ask yourself: Could <i>any administration be </i><i>so</i> clueless as to <i>honestly</i> think this would have gone well, despite the massive amount of information pointing solidly to the opposite conclusion?</p>
<p>Many people like to talk about how incompetent this administration is.  The reality, however, is that this administration is one of the <i>most</i> competent we&#8217;ve ever seen&#8230;look at all they&#8217;ve managed to accomplish in just six short years:</p>
<blockquote>
<p># Centralizing power within the executive branch to an unprecedented degree<br />
# Starting two major wars, one started with questionable intelligence and in a manner with which the military disagreed<br />
# Placing on the Supreme Court two far-right justices, and stacking the lower federal courts with many more<br />
# Cutting taxes during wartime, an unprecedented event<br />
# Passing a number of controversial bills such as the PATRIOT Act, the No Child Left Behind Act, the Medicare Drug bill, the Bankruptcy bill and a number of massive tax cuts<br />
# Rolling back and refusing to enforce a host of basic regulatory protections<br />
# Appointing industry officials to oversee regulatory agencies<br />
# Establishing a greater role for religion through faith-based initiatives<br />
# Passing Orwellian-titled legislation assaulting the environment â€” â€œThe Healthy Forests Actâ€ and the â€œClear Skies Initiativeâ€ â€” to deforest public lands, and put more pollution in our skies<br />
# (etc., etc., etc.)</p></blockquote>
<p><em>(List courtesy of the Rockridge Institute.)</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s no secret that this administration lies to the American people, but the best lie they ever told&#8230;and one that is still blindly accepted as truth, is that their real goals are identical to their stated goals, and any failure to accomplish their stated goals is due to incompetence, rather than the simple reason that their actual goals &#8211; the ones they are having no trouble accomplishing &#8211; are fundamentally at odds with their stated goals.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813418', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobey Tall</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813417</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobey Tall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813417</guid>
		<description>States to Outlaw Sales of Some Antiwar T-Shirts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>States to Outlaw Sales of Some Antiwar T-Shirts<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813417', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobey Tall</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813415</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobey Tall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813415</guid>
		<description>Thank You, Ron Paul

Ron Paul, a Republican congressman running for president, is saying what needs to be said about the 9/11 attacks and the Iraq war. Clearly, his rivals and the news media canâ€™t handle the truth.

http://www.fff.org/comment/com0705g.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You, Ron Paul</p>
<p>Ron Paul, a Republican congressman running for president, is saying what needs to be said about the 9/11 attacks and the Iraq war. Clearly, his rivals and the news media canâ€™t handle the truth.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fff.org/comment/com0705g.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.fff.org/comment/com0705g.asp</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813415', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobey Tall</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813413</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobey Tall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813413</guid>
		<description>Iraqâ€™s VP Opposes Draft Oil Law

Iraqâ€™s Vice President has publicly opposed Iraqâ€™s controversial Oil Law, saying it gives too many concessions to foreign oil companies. â€œWe disagree with the production sharing agreement,â€ Tariq al-Hashemi told reporters yesterday.

â€œWe want foreign oil companies, and we have to lure them into Iraq to learn from their expertise and acquire their technology, but we shouldnâ€™t give them big privileges,â€ al-Hashemi said. Continue reading â€˜Iraqâ€™s VP Opposes Draft Oil Lawâ€™</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iraqâ€™s VP Opposes Draft Oil Law</p>
<p>Iraqâ€™s Vice President has publicly opposed Iraqâ€™s controversial Oil Law, saying it gives too many concessions to foreign oil companies. â€œWe disagree with the production sharing agreement,â€ Tariq al-Hashemi told reporters yesterday.</p>
<p>â€œWe want foreign oil companies, and we have to lure them into Iraq to learn from their expertise and acquire their technology, but we shouldnâ€™t give them big privileges,â€ al-Hashemi said. Continue reading â€˜Iraqâ€™s VP Opposes Draft Oil Lawâ€™<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813413', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813411</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813411</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;â€œAs Iraqâ€™s government compiles a record of failure, the Bush administration is under growing pressure to intervene to rearrange Baghdadâ€™s dysfunctional political order, or even install a new leadership,â€ the LA Times reports today.&lt;/em&gt;

Hmmm . . . getting GDumbyaâ€™s administration to intervene in Baghdadâ€™s dysfunctional political order. Isnâ€™t that kind of like having a peodophile in charge of security at the local grade school?

If GDumbya is going to rearrange any dysfunctional political order, I would suggest that he begin in the U.S. A good first step would be for him and Darth Cheney to resign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>â€œAs Iraqâ€™s government compiles a record of failure, the Bush administration is under growing pressure to intervene to rearrange Baghdadâ€™s dysfunctional political order, or even install a new leadership,â€ the LA Times reports today.</em></p>
<p>Hmmm . . . getting GDumbyaâ€™s administration to intervene in Baghdadâ€™s dysfunctional political order. Isnâ€™t that kind of like having a peodophile in charge of security at the local grade school?</p>
<p>If GDumbya is going to rearrange any dysfunctional political order, I would suggest that he begin in the U.S. A good first step would be for him and Darth Cheney to resign.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813411', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobey Tall</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813410</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobey Tall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813410</guid>
		<description>Exclusive: Secret US plot to kill Al-Sadr 

The US Army tried to kill or capture Muqtada al-Sadr, the widely revered Shia cleric, after luring him to peace negotiations at a house in the holy city of Najaf, which it then attacked, according to a senior Iraqi government official. 

http://www.independent.co.uk/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exclusive: Secret US plot to kill Al-Sadr </p>
<p>The US Army tried to kill or capture Muqtada al-Sadr, the widely revered Shia cleric, after luring him to peace negotiations at a house in the holy city of Najaf, which it then attacked, according to a senior Iraqi government official. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.co.uk/</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813410', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shrinkandhammer</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813408</link>
		<dc:creator>shrinkandhammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813408</guid>
		<description>Could you check.  I think they have been doing the right direction/wrong direction  well before 2003.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you check.  I think they have been doing the right direction/wrong direction  well before 2003.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813408', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: President Bush</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-3813405</link>
		<dc:creator>President Bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/21/thinkfast-may-21-2007/#comment-3813405</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care if it doesn&#039;t look democratic to ya&#039;ll. I install the leaders I want. I did it here in 2000, I&#039;ll do it there in &#039;07!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care if it doesn&#8217;t look democratic to ya&#8217;ll. I install the leaders I want. I did it here in 2000, I&#8217;ll do it there in &#8216;07!!!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3813405', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
