Why you revel in corruption, I don’t get. The GOP rode into power in 1994 claiming the moral high ground. They’ve turned out to be one of the most incompetent, criminal bunch of a**holes I’ve ever seen. When right-wing clowns like you come on-line, it’s always to sneer at us morally-defective “libruls” yet you blatantly ignore the outrageous level of corruption w/in your own enclave. Where the sense of superioroty comes from, I have no idea. You strike me as being delusional. Proud to be one of the 31% who STILL think the Deciderer is doin’ one heck of job, Li’l Buddy?

There, fixed it for ya.

W/ Mark Foley, Ted Klaudt, Matthew Sanchez, Jeff Gannon/Guckert, and Rudy “The Drag Queen” Giuliani all in your corner, it’s almost impossible to not wonder why YOU chose a name like “Beefeater”, or why other trolls choose names like “Bottomboy” (you’re probably one and the same), or MF54. You get judged by the company you keep.

Will the GOP get RICO’d? Probably not. Do they qualify. totally. Why you rightwing perverts find your own corruption so entertaining is beyond me. Dem witch hunts? I dunno… go ask “the Duke-stir”, or Jim Ney, or Jack Abramoff, or David Savafian, or the other BuschCo Crime Family members resigning, getting subpoenaed, taking the 5th, suffering from severe memory loss, or getting convicted in droves these days, PERVERT.

Comment by the republic of stupidity — May 22, 2007 @ 8:52 pm

WTF is “endlessly suggestive” about a halfway decent gin? What gutter is your mind in? Besides, troll rule #6 says “A troll may choose any name that they deem appropriate.”

Burst my bubble? What does a daydream like “S/B RICO’d mean? Should be? Then why aren’t they? Are you making stuff up again?

Ok, so that gives you the right to be spineless wimps.

Please Russ Feingold, leave the Democrats and start a Progressive party. I will be first in line to sign up and work for you.

I am so disappointed in the Democrats I want to cry.

And what is it, w/ you trolls, choosing such endlessly suggestive names?

Dems. The party with NO balls.

per her lawyer:

“She was personal friends with a number of the individuals on Abramoff’s staff and as the committee’s own report makes clear, was frequently the recipient of communications from them, even if the substantive matters under discussion related only to activities by other officials in the White House. . .”

that’s going to be far too thin a gruel to
sustain an immunity/subpoena-compulsion deal
under 18 USC 6005 — as ms. monica goodling
was able to cobble together. . . though, on
her last-minute failure to produce documents,
even that deal may fall through. . . we’ll see.

Hating the repukian mafia daily

Hang out with us in the Head On Radio Network’s chatroom during her testimony! Commentary by our hosts during the breaks. :)
http://headonradionetwork.com

Peace all! – Sue

If ya wanna hang out and chat during Goodling’s testimony tomorrow, swing on by Head On Radio Network’s chatroom.
http://www.headonradionetwork.com/chatroom

Peace all! – Sue

Irina, I’ve been saying that for months. If there was ever a group begging to RICO’ed out there it’s BuschCo!

BTW: Why does a former DOJ employee still have “confidential” memoranda; and didn’t this “retention” issue trip up a former CIA official, Deutche?

I would like DoJ and the Judiciary to comment on why Goodling’s apparent “retention” of these documents has not been reviewed in the context of security, data protection, and compliance with DOJ internal classification guidance.

………
This is just simply amazing:

“Goodling fails to turn over documents subpoenaed by House committee”

Michael Roston
Published: Tuesday May 22, 2007

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Goodling_fails_to_turn_over_documents_0522.html

Why does this private citizen have OFFICAL documents in the first place? Didn’t the wingnuts get all hyper about Sandy berger taking some copies of doc.s? Lock the uberchristian bitch up…..

OMG!!! Indulgences are back, and this time bigger and better than ever. Now even Fredo can get into heaven…….

I don’t understand the dance. Either she complies with the law or she’s in contempt and may be open to an additional obstruction charge, not to mention the added bonus of conspiracy should others party to her alledged offenses come to like. Oh wait, that could open her up to Rico statutes to, couldn’t it.

I imagine the committee is being very deliberate. Heaven knows there are some bright people working on staff. The committee can’t be seen as being cowed by the likes of a Monica Goodling or they’ll lose what credibilty they have left.

“I take the Fifth, yer honor…”

“I can’t remember, yer honor…”

“To the best of my recollection, it was all Bill Clinton’s fault, yer honor…”

RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO! RICO!

“She is more than willing to provide it to the committee. However, she will, as we have previously discussed, require a grant of immunity before she is comfortable going forward,” Berenson also said in the deposition.

Read more: http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Former_Rove_aide_pleads_F...

Ah, Abramoff. The gift that keeps on giving!….

Even making the statement that she’s “more than willing” to provide the info if she’s granted immunity very likely puts her life in jeopardy from those she can expose, I’m afraid…

She has a juicy and interesting tale to tell, and I’d like to hear it. I’d also like to ask her about the 2004 election, but maybe that’s just me?

…..we are Nation of Lawsexcept if you’re a member of the Bush administration…. Wouldn’t it be nice to start behaving as such?

Enough of this bullshit……..

hey folks, enough. WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE?

How many CLinton advisors pled the 5th?
Where are the comparisons that show how culpable these people are, compared to the last administration? Why all the silence?

It this was a high ranking Clinton staffer pleading the 5th, all hell would be breaking loose right about now.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102×2855226

Don’t you wonder why these folks can’t be compelled to testify – or jailed. After all, they’re all on the public payroll, right? Transparency should be the minimum to expect from those who work for us.

There’s no wonder. It’s called the Constitution. Perhaps you should read up on it. Still, I agree with the your feelings. Clearly she’s got a lot to hide and it is annoying that she will be unlikely to ever pay for her crimes. Hopefully she rats out Rove. I’d love to see him an a Federal prison followed by a trip to the Hague for his war crimes trial.

And I think the best way to deal with this sort of lack of cooperation from executive branch employees is to require ALL executive branch emails, memos, phone calls, IM’s, meetings and whatever to be recorded and sent/forwarded to a set of Congressionally owned servers. That way, Congress Congress won’t have to go fishing around for evidence.