<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: COUNTERPOINT: Vote To Change The Course</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:33:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Merlin</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3822470</link>
		<dc:creator>Merlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 17:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3822470</guid>
		<description>#66 Comment by an evil liberal â€” May 24, 2007 @ 12:21 pm

&lt;em&gt;&quot;The Democrats cannot override his veto,&lt;/em&gt;

And this is why a NO vote was the best thing to do! The supposed cost you advocate below is simply quitting when the going gets rough. Throwing in the towel, as they say. Your &quot;pragmatism&quot; lacks courage!

&lt;em&gt; and will never be able to, given how the GOP votes party over country. If they keep pushing along this path, they will also lose control of the Senate (due to the traitor LIEbermanâ€™s switching caucuses threat), and that would be a huge blow to their hopes of ultimately stopping this war.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

This is just fearful capitulation. Read the DLC ideology and see the basic idea that formed it was a dramatic shift to the right, based, IMO, on the fear of becoming irrelavent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#66 Comment by an evil liberal â€” May 24, 2007 @ 12:21 pm</p>
<p><em>&#8220;The Democrats cannot override his veto,</em></p>
<p>And this is why a NO vote was the best thing to do! The supposed cost you advocate below is simply quitting when the going gets rough. Throwing in the towel, as they say. Your &#8220;pragmatism&#8221; lacks courage!</p>
<p><em> and will never be able to, given how the GOP votes party over country. If they keep pushing along this path, they will also lose control of the Senate (due to the traitor LIEbermanâ€™s switching caucuses threat), and that would be a huge blow to their hopes of ultimately stopping this war.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>This is just fearful capitulation. Read the DLC ideology and see the basic idea that formed it was a dramatic shift to the right, based, IMO, on the fear of becoming irrelavent.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3822470', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unbelievable</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3820758</link>
		<dc:creator>unbelievable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 19:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3820758</guid>
		<description>I have to add my name and voice to those who do not accept excuses for the backpeddling in Congress.

We&#039;ve been patient for far too long and we&#039;ve had enough.  We&#039;re tired of politician after politician selling us the same old crap.  If we seems angry, it&#039;s because we are no longer interested in compromises or consensus with George Bush.

Cut the funding.  All of it.  It&#039;s our freaking money and we&#039;re tired of our elected &#039;representatives&#039; spending it on killing and maiming people who aside from the accident of their birth country, wouldn&#039;t have any reason to be killing one another.

Enough.  We&#039;ve had enough.  Especially of excuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to add my name and voice to those who do not accept excuses for the backpeddling in Congress.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been patient for far too long and we&#8217;ve had enough.  We&#8217;re tired of politician after politician selling us the same old crap.  If we seems angry, it&#8217;s because we are no longer interested in compromises or consensus with George Bush.</p>
<p>Cut the funding.  All of it.  It&#8217;s our freaking money and we&#8217;re tired of our elected &#8216;representatives&#8217; spending it on killing and maiming people who aside from the accident of their birth country, wouldn&#8217;t have any reason to be killing one another.</p>
<p>Enough.  We&#8217;ve had enough.  Especially of excuses.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3820758', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Taylor</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3820372</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 17:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3820372</guid>
		<description>#40: &quot;Congress needs to do exactly what John Edwards said - keep sending back to the White House the same bill that other idiot vetoed. Send it over and over if necessary. Bush will be the one who refused to fund the troops, not Congress. When the current funding runs out, Bush will have no choice but to bring the troops home. It is as simple as that. Any additional funding needed to bring them home can be voted on then.&quot;
-----
Yes.
I can hardly believe we&#039;re reading this quisling crap in ThinkProgress. We did mobilize, act, blablabla, as one poster above suggests. And the Dems haven&#039;t got the balls to do anything about ANYthing: the wars, trade, domestic squalor.
Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton should just get the eff OUT of there. They have set back the cause of women a thousand years. Send in Maxine Waters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#40: &#8220;Congress needs to do exactly what John Edwards said &#8211; keep sending back to the White House the same bill that other idiot vetoed. Send it over and over if necessary. Bush will be the one who refused to fund the troops, not Congress. When the current funding runs out, Bush will have no choice but to bring the troops home. It is as simple as that. Any additional funding needed to bring them home can be voted on then.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Yes.<br />
I can hardly believe we&#8217;re reading this quisling crap in ThinkProgress. We did mobilize, act, blablabla, as one poster above suggests. And the Dems haven&#8217;t got the balls to do anything about ANYthing: the wars, trade, domestic squalor.<br />
Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton should just get the eff OUT of there. They have set back the cause of women a thousand years. Send in Maxine Waters.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3820372', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: an evil liberal</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3820155</link>
		<dc:creator>an evil liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 16:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3820155</guid>
		<description>I agree with Mr. McDonough on this... as much as I don&#039;t want this war to continue, how long do you expect the Democrats to yell at the brick wall that is the Bush White House?  If the Dems cut the funding for the war, Bush will just keep our soldiers out there anyway.  He&#039;s proven that he will use signing statements to virtually ignore anything he signs into law; why wouldn&#039;t he just ignore the will of Congress as he has been wont to do in the past?

The Democrats cannot override his veto, and will never be able to, given how the GOP votes party over country.  If they keep pushing along this path, they will also lose control of the Senate (due to the traitor LIEberman&#039;s switching caucuses threat), and that would be a huge blow to their hopes of ultimately stopping this war.

It is quite unfortunate that the Democrats have to let Bush win this battle in the war over the war...  It is far more important for the Democrats to be ultimately victorious in this fight, though.

I&#039;ve heard a lot of people parallel the Democrats&#039; behavior at the end of Vietnam to this, in the attempt to say, fighting the White House works.  However, Bush is not Nixon; Nixon at least had half a brain inside his head.  Bush doesn&#039;t care about the troops, he doesn&#039;t care about what the American people want, and he certainly could care less about what the Democrats in Congress want.

Ideally, I&#039;d like to see the Democrats take a firm stand on ending the war, and I&#039;d like to see it done NOW.  The reality of the situation, though, is that Bush doesn&#039;t have to do anything he doesn&#039;t want to do, as his veto cannot be overridden, given the current configuration of Congress.

I have faith in the Democrats that this is by no means the end of their opposition to the war, nor the end of their attempts to bring the troops home as soon as possible.  Fighting this battle, however, doesn&#039;t seem to be the way it&#039;s going to happen.  I don&#039;t like that things are that way, but that is the way it seems to be.

We&#039;re all passionate about ending this illegal occupation to defend an attempted corporate takeover of a nation&#039;s natural resources.  We cannot, however, let our passion blind us to reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mr. McDonough on this&#8230; as much as I don&#8217;t want this war to continue, how long do you expect the Democrats to yell at the brick wall that is the Bush White House?  If the Dems cut the funding for the war, Bush will just keep our soldiers out there anyway.  He&#8217;s proven that he will use signing statements to virtually ignore anything he signs into law; why wouldn&#8217;t he just ignore the will of Congress as he has been wont to do in the past?</p>
<p>The Democrats cannot override his veto, and will never be able to, given how the GOP votes party over country.  If they keep pushing along this path, they will also lose control of the Senate (due to the traitor LIEberman&#8217;s switching caucuses threat), and that would be a huge blow to their hopes of ultimately stopping this war.</p>
<p>It is quite unfortunate that the Democrats have to let Bush win this battle in the war over the war&#8230;  It is far more important for the Democrats to be ultimately victorious in this fight, though.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard a lot of people parallel the Democrats&#8217; behavior at the end of Vietnam to this, in the attempt to say, fighting the White House works.  However, Bush is not Nixon; Nixon at least had half a brain inside his head.  Bush doesn&#8217;t care about the troops, he doesn&#8217;t care about what the American people want, and he certainly could care less about what the Democrats in Congress want.</p>
<p>Ideally, I&#8217;d like to see the Democrats take a firm stand on ending the war, and I&#8217;d like to see it done NOW.  The reality of the situation, though, is that Bush doesn&#8217;t have to do anything he doesn&#8217;t want to do, as his veto cannot be overridden, given the current configuration of Congress.</p>
<p>I have faith in the Democrats that this is by no means the end of their opposition to the war, nor the end of their attempts to bring the troops home as soon as possible.  Fighting this battle, however, doesn&#8217;t seem to be the way it&#8217;s going to happen.  I don&#8217;t like that things are that way, but that is the way it seems to be.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re all passionate about ending this illegal occupation to defend an attempted corporate takeover of a nation&#8217;s natural resources.  We cannot, however, let our passion blind us to reality.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3820155', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3819914</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 14:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819914</guid>
		<description>This is why people perceive democrats as push-overs.  Because they are.  When the going gets tough, the dems cave.

Stop the war.  Impeach.  Do it.  This isn&#039;t a decision for you.  The American people have already decided.

~Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why people perceive democrats as push-overs.  Because they are.  When the going gets tough, the dems cave.</p>
<p>Stop the war.  Impeach.  Do it.  This isn&#8217;t a decision for you.  The American people have already decided.</p>
<p>~Sean<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819914', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis McDonough</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3819885</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis McDonough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 14:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819885</guid>
		<description>Thanks - I think - for the comments, and for the emails.  They&#039;re tough, but this is a tough business, and I accept the criticism of whatever role I may have had in the run up to the war in Iraq.  

A couple things.  

One, there is an internal inconsistency in the position of letting the veto stand.  Generally we all mistrust the President and fear he will not do the right thing, but to let the veto stand would be to transfer the power of the purse to the President as he would have the flexibility to do what he chooses until Congress does act.  The most pertinent precedent in this regard is the fight in 1970 over the Eagleton amendment to stop all funds being used in Laos.  Nixon vetoed it and continued the bombing campaign for months, coming back to Congress    for new funding only after the campaign was over.  

Two, why is this a change of course?  The President has to now, for the first time since this started, report to Congress on progress in Iraq and on whether Iraqis are meeting the benchmarks they agreed to.  DO I wish it were more? Of course.  But is the fact that the president has to come back to Congress and outline where his policy is failing -- and do so before the next supplemental is considered -- is an important change from his record to date of receiving blank checks for which he had to do nothing to be held accountable. 

This fight is in the early rounds.  This supplemental is not a knock out by any means, but we are moving toward ending this in a way that protects our interests. 

Thanks again for hearing me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; I think &#8211; for the comments, and for the emails.  They&#8217;re tough, but this is a tough business, and I accept the criticism of whatever role I may have had in the run up to the war in Iraq.  </p>
<p>A couple things.  </p>
<p>One, there is an internal inconsistency in the position of letting the veto stand.  Generally we all mistrust the President and fear he will not do the right thing, but to let the veto stand would be to transfer the power of the purse to the President as he would have the flexibility to do what he chooses until Congress does act.  The most pertinent precedent in this regard is the fight in 1970 over the Eagleton amendment to stop all funds being used in Laos.  Nixon vetoed it and continued the bombing campaign for months, coming back to Congress    for new funding only after the campaign was over.  </p>
<p>Two, why is this a change of course?  The President has to now, for the first time since this started, report to Congress on progress in Iraq and on whether Iraqis are meeting the benchmarks they agreed to.  DO I wish it were more? Of course.  But is the fact that the president has to come back to Congress and outline where his policy is failing &#8212; and do so before the next supplemental is considered &#8212; is an important change from his record to date of receiving blank checks for which he had to do nothing to be held accountable. </p>
<p>This fight is in the early rounds.  This supplemental is not a knock out by any means, but we are moving toward ending this in a way that protects our interests. </p>
<p>Thanks again for hearing me out.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819885', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fairyduster</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3819830</link>
		<dc:creator>fairyduster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 14:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819830</guid>
		<description>Let shrubs veto stand.

No more $$$$$$$ for Iraqs civil war.

Bring our troops home NOW!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let shrubs veto stand.</p>
<p>No more $$$$$$$ for Iraqs civil war.</p>
<p>Bring our troops home NOW!!!!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819830', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faiz</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3819696</link>
		<dc:creator>Faiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 12:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819696</guid>
		<description>Just to clarify why we decided to publish Denis&#039;s guest&#039;s post:

Denis has dissented from the TP/CAP position, and we believed he deserved an opportunity to make his case through a guest blog post in order to generate some true reflection and discussion on this issue. We also wanted to provide an opportunity for the TP community to weigh in with respect to his views.

Please be civil in your comments regarding Denis&#039;s posting. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify why we decided to publish Denis&#8217;s guest&#8217;s post:</p>
<p>Denis has dissented from the TP/CAP position, and we believed he deserved an opportunity to make his case through a guest blog post in order to generate some true reflection and discussion on this issue. We also wanted to provide an opportunity for the TP community to weigh in with respect to his views.</p>
<p>Please be civil in your comments regarding Denis&#8217;s posting. Thanks<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819696', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: labs</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3819674</link>
		<dc:creator>labs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 12:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819674</guid>
		<description>i haven&#039;t seen so much happy horseshit outside a stable in years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i haven&#8217;t seen so much happy horseshit outside a stable in years.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819674', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3819669</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 12:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819669</guid>
		<description>Screw the DLC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screw the DLC.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819669', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry Logan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3819645</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 10:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819645</guid>
		<description>Wise words, Mr. McDonough.  Many of the commenters here seem to be in an adolescent snit, which must be of great comfort to Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wise words, Mr. McDonough.  Many of the commenters here seem to be in an adolescent snit, which must be of great comfort to Republicans.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819645', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fool Zero</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3819609</link>
		<dc:creator>Fool Zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 06:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819609</guid>
		<description>If the Iraqi government successfully meets the benchmarks, we&#039;ll reward them by staying longer.

If they fail, we&#039;ll punish them by not leaving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Iraqi government successfully meets the benchmarks, we&#8217;ll reward them by staying longer.</p>
<p>If they fail, we&#8217;ll punish them by not leaving.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819609', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dantheman</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3819592</link>
		<dc:creator>dantheman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 05:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819592</guid>
		<description>Jay, who&#039;s a &quot;blue dog doubletalking paid shill?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, who&#8217;s a &#8220;blue dog doubletalking paid shill?&#8221;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819592', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3819584</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 05:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819584</guid>
		<description>This a$$hole is a blue dog doubletalking paid shill whose job it is to pat down the feathers of the blogoshphere. You may have noticed them on other sites--they&#039;re too eloquent, too longtalking, too referential. Like a congressional staffer or PR flack. Don&#039;t be deceived by these beltway a$$holes. The people have spoken. We want the Iraq war over--no matter which district you vote in. And if you won&#039;t lead, we&#039;ll put someone in your place--that means you, doubletalking paid shill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This a$$hole is a blue dog doubletalking paid shill whose job it is to pat down the feathers of the blogoshphere. You may have noticed them on other sites&#8211;they&#8217;re too eloquent, too longtalking, too referential. Like a congressional staffer or PR flack. Don&#8217;t be deceived by these beltway a$$holes. The people have spoken. We want the Iraq war over&#8211;no matter which district you vote in. And if you won&#8217;t lead, we&#8217;ll put someone in your place&#8211;that means you, doubletalking paid shill.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819584', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dantheman</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3819573</link>
		<dc:creator>dantheman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 05:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819573</guid>
		<description>Bush and the Pentagon will manage to reallocate money through at least September regardless of what bills congress passes. The Dems are smart to show that we are reasonable and that we want this thing to work. It is almost universally accepted that September is a make or break deadline. At that point the Dems will go for the jugular and the bloody fight will begin. In the meantime, the dems will appear reasonable and Bush looks more and more out of touch with reality. Not funding the war right now will not end the war before September. It&#039;ll only allow Bush to politicize any failures from now till then. The ball is now in Bush&#039;s court, but only till september, then we take over and end this sad war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush and the Pentagon will manage to reallocate money through at least September regardless of what bills congress passes. The Dems are smart to show that we are reasonable and that we want this thing to work. It is almost universally accepted that September is a make or break deadline. At that point the Dems will go for the jugular and the bloody fight will begin. In the meantime, the dems will appear reasonable and Bush looks more and more out of touch with reality. Not funding the war right now will not end the war before September. It&#8217;ll only allow Bush to politicize any failures from now till then. The ball is now in Bush&#8217;s court, but only till september, then we take over and end this sad war.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819573', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3819347</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 03:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819347</guid>
		<description>Denis McDonough is wrong. Congress has a moral obligation NOT to give Bush the money he asks for, especially after Bush, through incompetence and inefficiency, has wasted all the money already appropriated. As Murtha said the other night on Blitzer, it is Bush who has incompetently blown the nation&#039;s money while failing to protect our troops. 

That being said, it is completely inappropriate for Congressional Democrats to give Bush a carte blanche for more war. They are betraying their core constituents, and hopefully they will be challenged by independent, antiwar candidates in marginal districts in 2008.

This is a dangerous President who must be stopped. And this war must end now before it expands further. No to Denis. No to Bush. And no to the DLC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denis McDonough is wrong. Congress has a moral obligation NOT to give Bush the money he asks for, especially after Bush, through incompetence and inefficiency, has wasted all the money already appropriated. As Murtha said the other night on Blitzer, it is Bush who has incompetently blown the nation&#8217;s money while failing to protect our troops. </p>
<p>That being said, it is completely inappropriate for Congressional Democrats to give Bush a carte blanche for more war. They are betraying their core constituents, and hopefully they will be challenged by independent, antiwar candidates in marginal districts in 2008.</p>
<p>This is a dangerous President who must be stopped. And this war must end now before it expands further. No to Denis. No to Bush. And no to the DLC.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819347', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3819330</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 03:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819330</guid>
		<description>Great post&#039;s folk&#039;s, with the exception of the visiting troll writer and M.A&#039;s usual drival and her alter ego.....

Let me say I am still enraged, sent out a short scathing email to Larsen ( no foul language that I am most famous for)...

This is bull shit spread with jelly to appease the voter&#039;s....It ain&#039;t gonna work for me not in a million..I am letting them know they are not going to get away scott free with this crap.....Either they stop funding and impeach these basterd&#039;s, atleast put it back verbaly on the table, stop this war and tell bush to take a hike or I&#039;m against every last one of them..Period...They didn&#039;t put up a fight, hell I can do better and I know how to win..No more money, end it now.....Bull shit..I&#039;m pissed and looking at other parties to join..Yah I know that would mean we would be just as screwed for 4 more year&#039;s but about this, lives and my country I am one way....Lead. follow or get the hell outta my way....Blessings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post&#8217;s folk&#8217;s, with the exception of the visiting troll writer and M.A&#8217;s usual drival and her alter ego&#8230;..</p>
<p>Let me say I am still enraged, sent out a short scathing email to Larsen ( no foul language that I am most famous for)&#8230;</p>
<p>This is bull shit spread with jelly to appease the voter&#8217;s&#8230;.It ain&#8217;t gonna work for me not in a million..I am letting them know they are not going to get away scott free with this crap&#8230;..Either they stop funding and impeach these basterd&#8217;s, atleast put it back verbaly on the table, stop this war and tell bush to take a hike or I&#8217;m against every last one of them..Period&#8230;They didn&#8217;t put up a fight, hell I can do better and I know how to win..No more money, end it now&#8230;..Bull shit..I&#8217;m pissed and looking at other parties to join..Yah I know that would mean we would be just as screwed for 4 more year&#8217;s but about this, lives and my country I am one way&#8230;.Lead. follow or get the hell outta my way&#8230;.Blessings<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819330', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPark</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3819312</link>
		<dc:creator>JPark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 03:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819312</guid>
		<description>I get it libss, you don&#039;t actually have to take a stand on anything.  You can just stand back and insult everybody because you don&#039;t have any beliefs of your own.  That is very ballsy of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get it libss, you don&#8217;t actually have to take a stand on anything.  You can just stand back and insult everybody because you don&#8217;t have any beliefs of your own.  That is very ballsy of you.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819312', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libssuck</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-2/#comment-3819307</link>
		<dc:creator>libssuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 03:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819307</guid>
		<description>no,like i said i just don&#039;t like libs at all...and far as bush is concerned he will be leaving office in less than two years,so what is the point of bashing,you know he is going to veto everything that the dems throw at him....so go ahead bash away...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no,like i said i just don&#8217;t like libs at all&#8230;and far as bush is concerned he will be leaving office in less than two years,so what is the point of bashing,you know he is going to veto everything that the dems throw at him&#8230;.so go ahead bash away&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819307', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPark</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/comment-page-1/#comment-3819288</link>
		<dc:creator>JPark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 02:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/counterpoint-on-iraq-supp/#comment-3819288</guid>
		<description>libssuck, are you joking?  I believe you have Bush fecal matter on your nose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>libssuck, are you joking?  I believe you have Bush fecal matter on your nose.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3819288', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
