<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prodded By Industry Lobbying, Self-Proclaimed Global Warming Opponents Now Pushing Coal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:51:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3840224</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3840224</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ethanol is more expensive than gasoline.&quot; Not at the Citgo station near my house.
Nuclear power? Yes, it can be safe and efficient, but only if we follow France&#039;s model of complete government control. The safety issues are simply too important to leave to the cost-cutting Capitalist model. My father worked in this industry, and you would not believe the shortcuts taken by private contractors seeking profit over safety.
How about USE LESS!
No, that goes against everything Amerika stands for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ethanol is more expensive than gasoline.&#8221; Not at the Citgo station near my house.<br />
Nuclear power? Yes, it can be safe and efficient, but only if we follow France&#8217;s model of complete government control. The safety issues are simply too important to leave to the cost-cutting Capitalist model. My father worked in this industry, and you would not believe the shortcuts taken by private contractors seeking profit over safety.<br />
How about USE LESS!<br />
No, that goes against everything Amerika stands for.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3840224', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3838607</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3838607</guid>
		<description>I addressed this in an article last week on energy legislation in Congress. There&#039;s a whole lot more idiocy where this came from. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.energyandcapital.com/articles/coal-wind-renewable/441&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gump Rules&lt;/a&gt;.
--Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I addressed this in an article last week on energy legislation in Congress. There&#8217;s a whole lot more idiocy where this came from. See <a href="http://www.energyandcapital.com/articles/coal-wind-renewable/441" rel="nofollow">Gump Rules</a>.<br />
&#8211;Chris<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3838607', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3838564</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3838564</guid>
		<description>So according to this graph buying Cellulosic Ethanol from Brazil would best help the environment but isn&#039;t a path to energy independence.  Inversely, producing liquid gas from coal is great for energy independence, but bad for carbon emissions.  So it seems to me that we should be investing heavily into research on producing our own cellulosic ethanol (perhaps from switch grass) as well as finding better ways to capture and store carbon from coal gasification.  With only a 4% increase in carbon emissions from coal gasification using current filtration techniques it doesn&#039;t seem that we are too far off from finding a way towards energy independence AND reduced emissions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So according to this graph buying Cellulosic Ethanol from Brazil would best help the environment but isn&#8217;t a path to energy independence.  Inversely, producing liquid gas from coal is great for energy independence, but bad for carbon emissions.  So it seems to me that we should be investing heavily into research on producing our own cellulosic ethanol (perhaps from switch grass) as well as finding better ways to capture and store carbon from coal gasification.  With only a 4% increase in carbon emissions from coal gasification using current filtration techniques it doesn&#8217;t seem that we are too far off from finding a way towards energy independence AND reduced emissions.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3838564', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3830262</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 21:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3830262</guid>
		<description>There are two policy questions. One is about global warming. The other is energy security. When push comes to shove, energy security will trump global warming every time.  Live  just three days without electricity, running water, powered transport, or any of the goods made possible by these and you might begin to get it. ( For gosh sakes, 15% of our food energy derives directly from natural gas turned into ammonia fertilizer for  corn. So part of your experiment must involve living on less food.) 

Global warming may inundate all the low-lying areas of the world, destroying vast swaths of prime agricultural, commercial, and industrial property, and turning Wyoming into mosquito-infested swampland; but that will be nothing like the havoc that would ensue if all fossil fuel energy sources became unavailable without a replacement. 

If you want a secure energy future, folks, it&#039;s coal or nuclear that will carry the first 50% of the load. Pay your money and pick your choice. You gotta choose at least one. And if we wait thirty more years, we&#039;ll have global warming&#039;s curse without hope of the benefits of sustainable energy. We need to make tough choices now.  There is no free lunch. Coal liquefaction is probably a sensible part of the energy security portfolio. 

The good news is that sustainables, especially wind power, are currently attractive. Large investments here, can make room for an increased carbon footprint for other fuels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two policy questions. One is about global warming. The other is energy security. When push comes to shove, energy security will trump global warming every time.  Live  just three days without electricity, running water, powered transport, or any of the goods made possible by these and you might begin to get it. ( For gosh sakes, 15% of our food energy derives directly from natural gas turned into ammonia fertilizer for  corn. So part of your experiment must involve living on less food.) </p>
<p>Global warming may inundate all the low-lying areas of the world, destroying vast swaths of prime agricultural, commercial, and industrial property, and turning Wyoming into mosquito-infested swampland; but that will be nothing like the havoc that would ensue if all fossil fuel energy sources became unavailable without a replacement. </p>
<p>If you want a secure energy future, folks, it&#8217;s coal or nuclear that will carry the first 50% of the load. Pay your money and pick your choice. You gotta choose at least one. And if we wait thirty more years, we&#8217;ll have global warming&#8217;s curse without hope of the benefits of sustainable energy. We need to make tough choices now.  There is no free lunch. Coal liquefaction is probably a sensible part of the energy security portfolio. </p>
<p>The good news is that sustainables, especially wind power, are currently attractive. Large investments here, can make room for an increased carbon footprint for other fuels.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3830262', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loonie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3829317</link>
		<dc:creator>Loonie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 15:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3829317</guid>
		<description>Yayyyy! I missed the acid rain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yayyyy! I missed the acid rain.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3829317', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3829119</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 14:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3829119</guid>
		<description>Liquid HydrogenÂ´s position in the emissions chart is questionable.
Could it possibly be that production of liquid hydrogen is so energy
intensive that it ranks among the worst alternative fuels with respect to producing green house gases emissions?
Does anybody know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liquid HydrogenÂ´s position in the emissions chart is questionable.<br />
Could it possibly be that production of liquid hydrogen is so energy<br />
intensive that it ranks among the worst alternative fuels with respect to producing green house gases emissions?<br />
Does anybody know?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3829119', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basho</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3829107</link>
		<dc:creator>Basho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 14:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3829107</guid>
		<description>Boy, it takes a lot of balls by the coal lobby to be pushing hard for coal, doesn&#039;t it? You&#039;d think they wouldn&#039;t have a chance in hell of getting US taxpayers to hand over billions of dollars to subsidize coal. But of course, you&#039;d be dead wrong! Yes, there are completely insane Repuplicans and Democrats just waiting to jump on this!

Looks like our intrepid leaders are on some sort of secret mission: how to pull off global suicide for planet earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, it takes a lot of balls by the coal lobby to be pushing hard for coal, doesn&#8217;t it? You&#8217;d think they wouldn&#8217;t have a chance in hell of getting US taxpayers to hand over billions of dollars to subsidize coal. But of course, you&#8217;d be dead wrong! Yes, there are completely insane Repuplicans and Democrats just waiting to jump on this!</p>
<p>Looks like our intrepid leaders are on some sort of secret mission: how to pull off global suicide for planet earth.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3829107', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: impeachcheneythenbush</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3829023</link>
		<dc:creator>impeachcheneythenbush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 12:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3829023</guid>
		<description>I posted a link yesterday from the NYT about this issue.  One of the supporters of this idea is Barack Obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted a link yesterday from the NYT about this issue.  One of the supporters of this idea is Barack Obama!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3829023', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul in LA</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3829004</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul in LA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 11:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3829004</guid>
		<description>Gee, liquified coal. &lt;b&gt;Isn&#039;t that the stuff running in our poisoned rivers?&lt;/b&gt;

Filling valleys in Appalachia with mine tailings sure inspires with coal company best wishes. They just want to HELP.

Instead of Wolfowitz, make the CEO of Exxon the mayor of Baghdad. And make some coal company president his pointman. The Commander-and-Thief can be their third -- more than Blackwater gave Scott Helvensten. 

Give them an &#039;up-armored Humvee&#039; and a map of their route, two other things Blackwater failed to give to that Navy Seal and his crew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, liquified coal. <b>Isn&#8217;t that the stuff running in our poisoned rivers?</b></p>
<p>Filling valleys in Appalachia with mine tailings sure inspires with coal company best wishes. They just want to HELP.</p>
<p>Instead of Wolfowitz, make the CEO of Exxon the mayor of Baghdad. And make some coal company president his pointman. The Commander-and-Thief can be their third &#8212; more than Blackwater gave Scott Helvensten. </p>
<p>Give them an &#8216;up-armored Humvee&#8217; and a map of their route, two other things Blackwater failed to give to that Navy Seal and his crew.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3829004', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3828990</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 10:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3828990</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see:  troop surge? coal as clean fuel alternative? loyalty to wolfowitz? 

Yep.  George is hitting the bottle again.  Someone please take that key away from the White House liquor cabinet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see:  troop surge? coal as clean fuel alternative? loyalty to wolfowitz? </p>
<p>Yep.  George is hitting the bottle again.  Someone please take that key away from the White House liquor cabinet!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3828990', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toasterhead</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3828988</link>
		<dc:creator>toasterhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 10:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3828988</guid>
		<description>#14 - Electricity doesn&#039;t necessarily have to come from fossil fuels.  It could come from lightning - you just need to know exactly when it&#039;s going to strike the clock tower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#14 &#8211; Electricity doesn&#8217;t necessarily have to come from fossil fuels.  It could come from lightning &#8211; you just need to know exactly when it&#8217;s going to strike the clock tower.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3828988', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toasterhead</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3828987</link>
		<dc:creator>toasterhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 10:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3828987</guid>
		<description>Who needs mountains anyhow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who needs mountains anyhow?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3828987', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deniz Yeter</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3828954</link>
		<dc:creator>Deniz Yeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 06:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3828954</guid>
		<description>What about sustainable renewable energy like wind and solar?

Ethanol is a scam by oil companies to make more money, you waste more energy growing crops, processing it into ethanol, shipping, and storing it that it&#039;s a very great net energy loss.

Not to mention it costs more and gets worst miles per gallon, and also creates a smog that might potentially be worse than pollution we have now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about sustainable renewable energy like wind and solar?</p>
<p>Ethanol is a scam by oil companies to make more money, you waste more energy growing crops, processing it into ethanol, shipping, and storing it that it&#8217;s a very great net energy loss.</p>
<p>Not to mention it costs more and gets worst miles per gallon, and also creates a smog that might potentially be worse than pollution we have now.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3828954', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPark</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3828821</link>
		<dc:creator>JPark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 04:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3828821</guid>
		<description>Hehe. clean coal.  Oxymoron.

By the way, tranny, so you are all for being subservient to OPEC?  You would rather listen to those dirty arabs than actually break our oil habit?  By &quot;our&quot;. I mean the US&#039;s, not whatever country you are from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe. clean coal.  Oxymoron.</p>
<p>By the way, tranny, so you are all for being subservient to OPEC?  You would rather listen to those dirty arabs than actually break our oil habit?  By &#8220;our&#8221;. I mean the US&#8217;s, not whatever country you are from.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3828821', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jebb</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3828727</link>
		<dc:creator>Jebb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 03:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3828727</guid>
		<description>#14 As far as natural gas -- what the chart means is that for the same number of Btus produced with natural gas as compared to petroleum, carbon emissions are 29% less. Unfortunately natural gas production is having a devastating effect on air quality and wildlife habitat, etc. throughout the Rockies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#14 As far as natural gas &#8212; what the chart means is that for the same number of Btus produced with natural gas as compared to petroleum, carbon emissions are 29% less. Unfortunately natural gas production is having a devastating effect on air quality and wildlife habitat, etc. throughout the Rockies.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3828727', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valiant venus</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3828698</link>
		<dc:creator>valiant venus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 03:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3828698</guid>
		<description>Alexjandro - You could FORCE everyone to drive Prius&#039;s and there would still be the dreaded Global Warming.  Why?  Because more pollution is emitted from power plants than auto emissions. Let&#039;s emulate my least favourite European country, France, and build more nuclear power plants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexjandro &#8211; You could FORCE everyone to drive Prius&#8217;s and there would still be the dreaded Global Warming.  Why?  Because more pollution is emitted from power plants than auto emissions. Let&#8217;s emulate my least favourite European country, France, and build more nuclear power plants.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3828698', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill the thinker</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3828697</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill the thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 03:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3828697</guid>
		<description>Electricity = hydro power?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Electricity = hydro power?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3828697', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinnie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3828647</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 02:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3828647</guid>
		<description>#14 - I saw that &#039;electricity&#039; there.  One would need to know where this &#039;electricity&#039; is coming from.  If it were from a dirty coal plant it would be horrible.  If it were from solar it would be great.

And while I&#039;m not a tin hat type, the trolls really do come out in force on almost every global warming topic.  They parade all of the standard arguments of obfuscation and apathy.  Of course, the end result of what they suggest is continued profits for Exxon and company.  ...  I&#039;m just saying.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#14 &#8211; I saw that &#8216;electricity&#8217; there.  One would need to know where this &#8216;electricity&#8217; is coming from.  If it were from a dirty coal plant it would be horrible.  If it were from solar it would be great.</p>
<p>And while I&#8217;m not a tin hat type, the trolls really do come out in force on almost every global warming topic.  They parade all of the standard arguments of obfuscation and apathy.  Of course, the end result of what they suggest is continued profits for Exxon and company.  &#8230;  I&#8217;m just saying.  :)<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3828647', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginko</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3828641</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 02:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3828641</guid>
		<description>ah yes, coal. A perfectly backwards idea. Yet another stone on the pathway back to the stone age. These people are braindead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah yes, coal. A perfectly backwards idea. Yet another stone on the pathway back to the stone age. These people are braindead.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3828641', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alejandro</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-3828635</link>
		<dc:creator>Alejandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 02:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/coal-warming/#comment-3828635</guid>
		<description>Wait, on the chart, one of the &quot;energy sources&quot; is Electricity. Huh? And how would burning natural gas reduce CO2? I don&#039;t get that chart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, on the chart, one of the &#8220;energy sources&#8221; is Electricity. Huh? And how would burning natural gas reduce CO2? I don&#8217;t get that chart.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3828635', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
