LMAO. If you bother reading the article you are describing an unclassified letter from the CIA to Plame about her retirement benefits as this information being “declassified and disseminated”.
Clearly it deserves neither description.

Also if Plame finding out how long she has worked for the CIA in a private communication between these two parties amounts to these details being “declassified and disseminated” information that is able to be freely republished without consequence, then clearly Robert Novak isn’t the enormous arsehole we’ve all been thinking he was for the past 4 years.

Libby. Cheney. Absolved. Because obviously once Plame knows details about herself then sharing this with the rest of the world is no different and breaches no classification rules about that information. Right ?

Yeah, why don’t you tell us who you think is stupid there kid. I’ll jot that down for future reference right after I catch Rosie O’Donnell’s list of fat delusional women with little future in media.

Sorry retard but what relevance does this have to anything I’ve written ? Comment by Kilo — May 31, 2007 @ 9:07 pm

Classifying something that’s already been de-classified and disseminated is as st*pid as your comment. Jake*ss…

Again, this has no bearing on the fact that this happens as standard practice and that nobody has yet suggested that this classification isn’t warranted or allowed.

Much like the NSA spying on US citizens it appears that yet again this isn’t a problem for 30 years but it is when it happens while Bush is in office.

BTW if I were you I wouldn’t choose to cite the stupidity of an arguement as a disqualifying factor. After all, the article does state Plame is arguing that the classification of CIA service details violates the constitution.

Still zero people willing to agree with that statement ?
Even here pretty much every Bushhitler!!-treason!!!-impeach! screaming smacktard seems to realise how stupid such a precedent would be.

Sure it is… Then how do you explain that an employee can fill out a resume with their “dates of employment” in the private sector, and she can’t?

I don’t explain this. I assume that you can figure out on your own that listing “CIA front company Brewster Jennings” on your resume differs from someone in the private sector listing who they worked for in exactly the same way, then work backwards.

You didn’t actually think that private sector employees with confidentiality agreements were prevented from where they worked or for what periods were you ?

Or that if they did this could result in their business associates and work they accomplished during that tenure being compromised did you ?

Try using your head before typing. Saves redundant questions and answers like these. Makes you look less naive.

You’re a st*pid lying little b*tch.
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — May 31, 2007 @ 9:10 pm
#

Sure thing, random non sequitur insult guy.

But this is the US not the USSR. Demand that the names of those other employees be released in a completely irony-free way. Comment by Kilo — May 31, 2007 @ 8:53 pm

Then maybe you should tell the US government to stop using USSR tactics? St*pid little b8tch…
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — May 31, 2007 @ 9:10 pm

Non sequitur insult man strikes again!

Maybe you should have told them this every year for the past 30 when the same thing was happening.
Or just quit with the selective, fake, hysterical outrage.

That is really only a symptom. They classify everything just in case it might hurt them. That is the real problem.

Maybe we can get him to declassify anything with which the CIA has issues.

Comment by unbelievable — May 31, 2007 @ 11:35 pm”

Great head on it, lasted for at least 10 minutes. Color was about the same, maybe darker. Can’t say I tasted it – well, it was piss after all.

Miller? You can have it all. I prefer microbrews on tap. There is this microbrewery in Boise that has a lot of really great unique flavors. My friends and I used to go there often. :D”

The Roberts quote is the ultimate in logic. Unfortunately “believers” aren’t exactly swayed by logic…or science…or history.

Oh, I prefer micros too (we have about 10000 of them in WI). As a mass marketed product Miller isn’t bad (it is better than Bud or “god” forbid, Coors).

You know this because…. ?

I love the Roberts quote because I think it is probably the best explanation for rejecting all deities.

Miller? You can have it all. I prefer microbrews on tap. There is this microbrewery in Boise that has a lot of really great unique flavors. My friends and I used to go there often. :D

Life’s too short to drink that. I’ve pissed better beer.

I’ll give him that at least it’s not Budweiser…

Comment by unbelievable — May 31, 2007 @ 9:39 pm

As Stephen Roberts said, “We are all atheists, I just believe in one less god than you do. When you understand why you don’t believe in other gods, then you will understand why I don’t believe in yours.”

Knock Bud all you want but leave Miller out of it. It is good for my state :)

Well, aren’t they all? :D

I’ll give him that at least it’s not Budweiser…

Comment by unbelievable

Like I said: false god. Otherwise he would at least be drinking Murphy’s.

LOL…

Of course if he were a benevolent god he’d get it himself.

Get him the Guiness! Somebody has to drink that shit. :D

Comment by ForTruth — May 31, 2007 @ 9:16 pm

Isn’t it though? They get all hot and bothered when TREASON is being discussed.

squirm scum, squirm

Oh my Wilco! You’re a demanding deity! I thought you were just gonna create them at will now that you’ve been promoted to god status?

While that makes no sense I have noticed you have dropped all pretenses of not being a rabid right-winger, Saywho. Congratulations.