Schlozman Under Fire From Senate Over Effort To Squash Voter Suppression Probe
Schlozman Under Fire From Senate Over Effort To Squash Voter Suppression Probe
Yesterday, the Los Angeles Times reported that former Minnesota U.S. Attorney Thomas Heffelfinger may have been targeted for removal by the Justice Department because of his role in protecting the rights of Native American voters.
Heffelfinger, who resigned last year for personal reasons, had raised concerns that an effort by the Republican Secretary of State, Mary Kiffmeyer, to bar certain uses of Tribal IDs for voter identification would result in electoral discrimination against Indian voters.
Heffelfinger’s efforts to dig deeper into the issue were blocked by two controversial political appointees in the Department, Bradley Schlozman and Hans von Spakovsky, who used bureaucratic measures to prevent an internal department investigation:
After reviewing the matter, Rich recommended opening an investigation.
In response, he said, Bradley Schlozman, a political appointee in the department, told Rich “not to do anything without his approval” because of the “special sensitivity of this matter.”
Rich responded by suggesting that more information be gathered from voting officials in the Twin Cities area, which includes Minnesota’s two most populous counties.
A message came back from another Republican official in the department, Hans von Spakovsky, saying Rich should not contact the county officials but should instead deal only with the secretary of state’s office.
Von Spakovsky indicated, Rich said, that working with Kiffmeyer’s office reduced the likelihood of a leak to the news media.
The orders from Schlozman and Von Spakovsky, who wielded unusual power in the civil rights division, effectively ended any department inquiry, Rich said.
Yesterday, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) wrote to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) about Schlozman’s upcoming testimony to Congress, urging Leahy to question him “closely” about:
– his efforts to effectively quash the investigation into possible voter discrimination against Native Americans;
– what role, if any, Tom Heffelfinger’s efforts to protect the voting rights of Minnesota’s Native American communities placed him on the Department’s now infamous list for termination.
Schlozman, who is suspected of politicizing the hiring of non-political jobs in the DoJ’s Civil Rights Division, will testify on Tuesday, June 5.
UPDATE: The Legal Times previews Schlozman’s testimony.
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
76 Responses to “Schlozman Under Fire From Senate Over Effort To Squash Voter Suppression Probe”
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
fair elections would mean few republicans, if any, would ever win - “and that’s not fair to us”
f’ing crybaby charlatans
June 1st, 2007 at 5:15 pmIt is sickening that criminals are running the Justice Department.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:21 pmHow about some Friday fun and no worry about the Democrat attempts to steal another election. This one is funny.
Clinton’s Hillarious spelling gaffe
June 01, 2007 12:00
POOR old Hillary Clinton - let down by a logo.
The presidential hopeful - in the running to be first female leader of the free world - was left looking like a goose during a speech to Silicon Valley technology business leaders in California.
Her podium, at the Applied Technologies University campus in Santa Clara, was framed by a backdrop featuring the large slogan “New jobs for tommorrow”.
Yep, that’s right, with an extra “M” in the middle of the last word.
According to a gushing report from the scene, “She quickly let her audience of some 150 Silicon Valley CEO’s know that she was the hi-technology presidential candidate”.
However, Ms Clinton clearly failed to impress upon them that she was the high-quality grammatical candidate.
And while they focus on new jobs for tomorrow, perhaps they should all concentrate on correct spelling for today.
Read the local report and see video of Ms Clinton, and the offending sign, by clicking
June 1st, 2007 at 5:22 pmFor those who want a good laugh at the expense of a socialist fool.
http://www.news.com.au/ dailytelegraph/ story/ 0,22049,21831498-5001021,00.html?from=public_rss#
June 1st, 2007 at 5:26 pmEureka! I see clearly now.
I thought (errantly I guess) that the most pressing issue of the day was that a Democratic majority congress, that came to “power” via the people’s desire to end the Iraq Genocide Project, has done nothing to end the “war” and has actually even ESCALATED the atrocity.
Instead, I see now that the most pressing issue of the day is that political sleazeballs have been doing politically sleazy things and that thanks to the new Democratic congress, we will not rest until each and every sleazy Republican politician is exposed and granted immunity.
Progressive indeed.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:26 pmThis could be bad for Democrats.
As a liberal Democrat, I am concerned.
They should not pursue this case too vigorously or they will end up looking partisan.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:28 pm#3 - Patrick1,
June 1st, 2007 at 5:33 pmTwo words - “Constitutional mustard”. Regulars will understand.
Why does the behind-the-scenes maneuvering to disenfranchise American Indians, for crass, venial, political reasons, not shock me?
Oh yeah, that’s right, American society has continually fucked over Indians for centuries now (up to an including out-right genocide). When will we as a nation stop behaving like sociopaths and begin behaving like human beings?
June 1st, 2007 at 5:35 pm#3 So was Bush’s “Mission Accomplished” banner a spelling error and should have read “Collosal-Fuck-Up Accomplished”…?
June 1st, 2007 at 5:37 pm“The presidential hopeful - in the running to be first female leader of the free world - was left looking like a goose during a speech to Silicon Valley technology business leaders in California.”
Patrick1 you fool. The president of the US is NOT the leader of the free world. Check out what the world thinks of the current president to get a feel for how the US doesn’t run the free world.
Imagine Bush’s embarrassment with the “Mission Accomplished” sign. Oh wait, he’s not embarrassed yet he should be.
Go back to your hole Patrick.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:39 pmThis could be bad for Democrats.
As a liberal Democrat, I am concerned.
They should not pursue this case too vigorously or they will end up looking partisan.
Comment by concernTroll 3050 — June 1, 2007 @ 5:28 pm
You have to be the funniest troll we’ve had.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:40 pmFor those who want to laugh at the video.
http://www.news.com.au/ dailytelegraph/ story/ 0,22049,21831498-5001021,00.html?from=public_rss#
June 1st, 2007 at 5:40 pmDemocrats of Nation Unite!!!!
Do you all have your flashlights?
June 1st, 2007 at 5:40 pmAt least now we know what Hillary’s campaign song will be.
Don’t Stop Thinking About Tommorrow
Have A Potatoe, Hillary…LOL
June 1st, 2007 at 5:41 pm#11 So no reply to my question?
June 1st, 2007 at 5:42 pmI guess spelling won’t be one of the Hillary! campaign’s strong suits. But don’t hold your breath for the kind of media reaction this would get if it were President Bush or Dan Quayle.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:45 pmWhat’s the question?
June 1st, 2007 at 5:46 pmAlso in celebration of the best seller “Reagan Diaries”.
“Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15.â€
June 1st, 2007 at 5:47 pm-Ronald Reagan
Have A Potatoe, Hillary…LOL
Comment by Patrick1 — June 1, 2007 @ 5:41 pm
Nice one, PatrickSmall1! Um… you DO realize, don’t you, that you just quoted Dan Quayle? You know, George HW Bush’s Veep?
And you might consider that Dan Quayle not only made that particular mistake verbally, but he did it while correcting a school child. Only problem was, the school child had it right and the Republican Vice-President had it wrong. How embarrassing!
But thanks for reminding us.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:47 pm“As a liberal Democrat, I am concerned.”
Liar. You’re not a liberal Democrat, because we NEVER say this:
“They should not pursue this case too vigorously or they will end up looking partisan.”
That’s a Repuke talking point. Democrats shouldn’t stand up to Chimpy and his criminal empire because they might look partisan. Waah. Waah.
Go back under your bridge, troll.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:47 pmPlease ignore this asshole troll.
He is trying to hijack the topic.
The topic is VOTER FRAUD BY THE REPUKES.
Stay on topic…Stay on topic…
June 1st, 2007 at 5:49 pmI’m wearing lacy panties under my Haggar slacks.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:51 pmGo back under your bridge, troll.
Comment by Tom3 — June 1, 2007 @ 5:47 pm
Good job, Tom3! You’ve busted a troll who calls himself “ConcernTroll”! How did you figure it otu?
June 1st, 2007 at 5:51 pmTroll wants to talk about a typo on a banner.
Big freakin’ deal. That’s a non-story.
Anything but having to talk about the crooked Repukes fixing elections and disenfranchising minority voters.
Troll can’t handle the truth.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:52 pmthat’s all you clowns got? a spelling error?
how juvenile, like all your view points.
the thread is about the sleaze ball Schlotzman who is definately at the core of the criminal election fraud going on in the Justice Dept. It’s gonna tie all these cheating treasonous bastards and send these creeps to JAIL. One by one tic tic tic
Rovie, you sweaty pig, feel the heat yet?
June 1st, 2007 at 5:52 pmYou and Dick must be pretty jumpy these days. Bush is too dumb, he still thinks he is gonna get away with all this
#16,
Iran Contra.
Unlike Reagan, the rest of the world has not forgotten about that one.
Which is why, unlike the few remaining delusional fanatics, the world has forgotten about Reagan.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:54 pmGood job, Tom3! You’ve busted a troll who calls himself “ConcernTrollâ€! How did you figure it otu?
LOL! Yeah, there was a clue there.
Remember, this is a catch-and-release website. We aren’t allowed to shoot trolls, just throw them back under the bridge. It’s the humane way to treat those poor little brain dead critters.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:55 pmPat you prick, nice try at changing the subject, but nothing you say here is going to prevent Bradley Schlozman from getting his ass puckered in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:56 pmRepukes think every day is Tax Refund Day.
That’s because if they’re rich enough, Chimpy makes sure they don’t pay any taxes.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:56 pmNice try to attempt to derail the thread Patty,
without fixed elections, Repubs wouldn’t have a chance. Hee hee.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:56 pmGotta run! My mom’s making my favorite! Meatloaf shaped like a turd!
June 1st, 2007 at 5:58 pmRemember, this is a catch-and-release website. We aren’t allowed to shoot trolls, just throw them back under the bridge. It’s the humane way to treat those poor little brain dead critters.
Comment by Tom3 — June 1, 2007 @ 5:55 pm
Does Whack-a-Troll count as inhumane? I hope not.
June 1st, 2007 at 5:58 pmDamnit, were is Mr President? I miss the intellectual cut and thrust of his arguments.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:05 pmSpeaking of errors, how about if someone quashes a probe for frickin’ once instead of squashing it?
June 1st, 2007 at 6:07 pmDamnit, were is Mr President? I miss the intellectual cut and thrust of his arguments.
Comment by UKBristolDave — June 1, 2007 @ 6:05 pm
I’m here dave, I skipped over this one early because it seemed boring, but I’m on the case.
You’ll be hear top-knotch witticisms in no time!
June 1st, 2007 at 6:13 pmThere should be a federal I.D. given to everybody to stop voter fraud. Voters would be required to show it when voiting. All people would need to do is provide proof of citizenship to recieve it, I would even be okay having the government pay for it.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:13 pm#14 So you have no ability to scroll up and read?
June 1st, 2007 at 6:14 pmJust take a good look at Schnozolaman and you KNOW he’s as twisted and evil as the day is long! Time to get his testimony so he perjures himself and will be thrown into the slammer. Isn’t this guy some sort of character actor on the side?? wow! What a face!
June 1st, 2007 at 6:16 pmYou KNOW Schnozola-man will be the next one going down for “big time” civil rights crimes.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:17 pm#32,
Why stop there? People can lose an ID or leave it at home. I think we should make all citizens get a tatoo or a “mark” of some sort that would be easily seen and identified. Say on their forehead or right hand or something.
Go USSA!
June 1st, 2007 at 6:18 pmFor anyone new to these threads, we do not feed the trolls. And these trolls are so blatantly obvious that there is, literally, no need to mention their names. They’re not worth acknowledging and we just scroll right past their posts because it’s a total waste of time, intelligence, and energy. They’re pretty pathetic and need to be ignored.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:19 pmWait a minute, this story is more TP b.s., I’m not wasting my time following links to other b.s. TP threads.
As a matter of fact, I already commented on this piece of shit story:
Democrats of Nation Unite!!!!
Do you all have your flashlights?
Comment by Mr. President — June 1, 2007 @ 5:40 pm
Dave, this refers to a different thread in which I posted something like:
“Dems like to shine flashlights in underlings’ a$$holes!”
ZING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But really though,
Matt, pathetic dude, step your game up a knotch.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:19 pmWTF? I had two posts which are now gone.
TP’s content management software and commenting software truly does suck. Why they don’t demand email verified registered accounts to post comment which would prevent name jacking) and a robust commenting system that doesn’t lose or disappear comments and actually posts comments in real time (or at least a timely manner) would be a significant improvement.
I think TP’s content itself is usually very good and timely, but the actual nuts and bolts of the commenting software… lame.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:19 pmWhy stop there? People can lose an ID or leave it at home. I think we should make all citizens get a tatoo or a “mark†of some sort that would be easily seen and identified. Say on their forehead or right hand or something.
Go USSA!
Comment by Fed the Fcuk Up!
Why do you want voter fraud to take place? Why don’t you want to ensure the person that is voter is who they say they are?
June 1st, 2007 at 6:21 pm#32 Hey Timmy - if you really want to discuss true “voter fraud”, then I suggest you get the core of it all. Check out how the past two elections were stolen at http://www.blackboxvoting.org or http://www.bradblog.com and you’ll realize that the issuance of a federal ID means absolutely nothing. It no longer matters that anyone votes - the hackers will corrupt the machines as the votes are cast. In the case of complacency due to the authorities espousing “paper ballots”, guess what?? Paper ballots are counted via an “opti-scan machine” which has software that has been and will be hacked! Diebold machines have been hacked by several organizations and universities and it’s well know now for well over a year - Princeton University is doing their own research and they’ve found an “intentional vulnerability” in these machines - Oh…My!! What a surprise, eh??
There’s really no point in voting any longer if the machines are hacked, is there?
One more “right” we thought we had in this quasi-democracy-cum-fascism!
June 1st, 2007 at 6:23 pmThe Bush Cabal and GOP would like everyone to believe that the problem we have with “voting rights” is the supression of voters which is a crime for sure - however, the much larger picture is the GOP’s role, along with Diebold and Ken Blackwell (Supervisor of elections for the state of Ohio whose conflict of interest as Co-Chair of Bush-Cheney ‘04 led him into the abyss of voter corruption and he is being investigated as I type for his role in all of this. Two men in Ohio have already pled guilty to “voting machine tampering” and are serving sentences; however…..however….the much larger picture is “how” this was all accomplished….look to the Federalist Society for those answers as their main function is the overturning of all laws which pertain to civil rights and the continuation of this democracy…..couple that with PNAC and you’ve got the perfect prescription for the downfall of this country, which they are in the process of accomplishing right now. It’s all been part of a huge “coup” on this country from the inside. Do your homework - it’s all there - the dots can be readily connected and are being connected by intelligent minds…..scientists weighing in on the “improbable collapse” and so many tenacles of this gargantuan octopus called the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). After all, the Patriot act was forged well in advance of 911 and bush was quoted as stating to the PNAC members who devised it: We will need another “pearl harbor-type event” to accomplish this……and voila! 911.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:28 pmNeed I say more??
veritas
we should worry about the upcoming election for just those reasons and get to the bottom of this. Schlotzman and Von Spazky up next for grilling
June 1st, 2007 at 6:29 pmTimmy - I appreciate your candor but you are trivializing the real problem here. It’s not about a voter ID or “lost card” - it’s about the Hacking of this democracy by powers within. There’s a great HBO special entitled ‘HACKING DEMOCRACY’ which every american needs to see. Then you will realize that the “voter fraud” to which Gonzo or Bush refer is “small potatoes” and a “diversionary tactic” to make it appear that they care about voting rights - hell, the used the handicapped lobby to usher in HAVA in order to get their DRE’s in place to be hacked. Don’t sleep walk, Timmy. There are much larger issues here than a mere ID!
June 1st, 2007 at 6:30 pm#40,
Vote Fraud is already a crime.
Just like rape is a crime. So why aren’t you advocating that all men get castrated so as to ensure that they cannot ever commit the crime of rape, if they wanted to. Same logic moron.
You combat crime by punishing the criminals. You do NOT combat crime by assuming that everyone is a criminal.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:31 pmWhy do you want voter fraud to take place? Why don’t you want to ensure the person that is voter is who they say they are?
Comment by timmeh — June 1, 2007 @ 6:21 pm
TIMMEH! Why are you so convinced that voter fraud is a huge problem? The reason some US Attorneys got canned is because they refused to file voter fraud cases when evidence said no such fraud existed.
On the other hand, it does provide you decent cover to suppress the vote of poor and minority voters, the kind who generally vote Democratic.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:32 pm#43 Justice - How serendipitous that this is occurring right now! It may already be “too late” to do anything about the massive hacking which has been occurring in our elections. Americans have lost faith - that is, those who know the truth and the facts. Since every other constitutional right has been eroded or expunged from the document, the right to vote and have one’s vote count (and not be hacked) would seem to also be at risk right now. Nothing is being done substantially to correct it. The “smoke & mirrors” tactic is to mandate “paper trails” which does absolutely nothing to solve the hacking problem because the paper will never be able to be accurately hand counted. These “paper ballots” will be scanned on an opti-scan computer to count them….so how does this eliminate hacking?? It doesn’t at all. That’s the point.
We claim a benchmark of democracy in Iraq when the Iraqis voted and flashed their dyed fingers which was accomplished in a complete lockdown of the streets and under military protection - yet - yet - we allow the intentional hacking of our own supposed democratic elections? How hypocritical can one get?? This country has stopped “walking the talk” and, as such, has become a bastion of evil and corruption because in not walking our own talk, we’ve become lying hypocrites who have lost the respect of the entire globe at this point. We’ve got no one to blame but ourselves for our demise at this point.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:35 pmPerhaps our lil’ timmy here is a “concern troll”?? It’s beginning to smell like one.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:36 pmVote Fraud is already a crime.
Just like rape is a crime. So why aren’t you advocating that all men get castrated so as to ensure that they cannot ever commit the crime of rape, if they wanted to. Same logic moron.
You combat crime by punishing the criminals. You do NOT combat crime by assuming that everyone is a criminal.
Comment by Fed the Fcuk Up!
You comparison is ridiculous. You are comparing getting castrated to getting a free id card? Obviously you don’t want fair elections. Why is it so much to ask for people to give proof of who they are?
June 1st, 2007 at 6:37 pmTimmy - I appreciate your candor but you are trivializing the real problem here. It’s not about a voter ID or “lost card†- it’s about the Hacking of this democracy by powers within. There’s a great HBO special entitled ‘HACKING DEMOCRACY’ which every american needs to see. Then you will realize that the “voter fraud†to which Gonzo or Bush refer is “small potatoes†and a “diversionary tactic†to make it appear that they care about voting rights - hell, the used the handicapped lobby to usher in HAVA in order to get their DRE’s in place to be hacked. Don’t sleep walk, Timmy. There are much larger issues here than a mere ID!
Comment by veritas
I agree with all you say are issues. But if the machines are correct, they are only as good as the voters that cast their vote. If they are not who they say they are the machines could be airtight and it wouldn’t matter.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:38 pmTIMMEH! Why are you so convinced that voter fraud is a huge problem? The reason some US Attorneys got canned is because they refused to file voter fraud cases when evidence said no such fraud existed.
On the other hand, it does provide you decent cover to suppress the vote of poor and minority voters, the kind who generally vote Democratic.
Comment by KRank
I have yet to see enough proof that they were canned for that reason.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:39 pmHey Timmy - get a brain here! You’re beginning to sound like the juvenile version of Jake….or is it Patrick1? Or one of the other thousand monikers you come here with each day in an attempt to hijack the veracity of these threads.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:40 pmPerhaps our lil’ timmy here is a “concern troll�? It’s beginning to smell like one.
Comment by veritas
What is a “concern troll”?
June 1st, 2007 at 6:40 pmLet’s not permit timmy, the concern troll, hijack an otherwise intelligent discussion. Obviously, he’s incapable of knowledgeable repartee.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:41 pmWhat don’t you understand, Timmy, about how to hack a voting machine? Is it possible that you are computer literate enough to operate a PC and somehow NOT “Get” it?? Good bye! I don’t communicate with trolls or people who attempt to defraud others by pretending to be stupid.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:43 pmHey Timmy - get a brain here! You’re beginning to sound like the juvenile version of Jake….or is it Patrick1? Or one of the other thousand monikers you come here with each day in an attempt to hijack the veracity of these threads.
Comment by veritas
Is this thread not about voter fraud? I am bringing up a valid point and the left just wants to blame big bad republicans for everything rather than address issues.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:43 pmAdios….TP friends…..this concern troll is a total waste of time.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:44 pmLet’s not permit timmy, the concern troll, hijack an otherwise intelligent discussion. Obviously, he’s incapable of knowledgeable repartee.
Comment by veritas
So you do not think people voting should be required to prove they are who they say they are?
June 1st, 2007 at 6:44 pmWhat don’t you understand, Timmy, about how to hack a voting machine? Is it possible that you are computer literate enough to operate a PC and somehow NOT “Get†it?? Good bye! I don’t communicate with trolls or people who attempt to defraud others by pretending to be stupid.
Comment by veritas
I agree that it is an issue, but so is voter ID. Why can’t you get that?
June 1st, 2007 at 6:49 pmAdios….TP friends…..this concern troll is a total waste of time.
Comment by veritas
Bye-Come back when you can form an intelligent thought.
June 1st, 2007 at 6:50 pmtimmy just wants to get the last word in before lassie tries to announce he fell down the well…again.
out too…it’s a juvenile’s game.
June 1st, 2007 at 7:00 pmtimmy just wants to get the last word in before lassie tries to announce he fell down the well…again.
out too…it’s a juvenile’s game.
Comment by labs
Do you care about voter fraud?
June 1st, 2007 at 7:04 pmI have yet to see enough proof that they were canned for that reason.
Comment by timmy — June 1, 2007 @ 6:39 pm
Yet you HAVE seen enough proof to tell you that voter fraud is a huge problem, huh?
Do some research, Timmeh.
“John McKay of Washington state, who had decided two years earlier not to bring voter fraud charges that could have undermined a Democratic victory in a closely fought gubernatorial race, said White House counsel Harriet Miers and her deputy, William Kelley, “asked me why Republicans in the state of Washington would be angry with me.”
McKay was later fired.
“Florida and Colorado bring to nine the number of closely contested election states where the Bush administration set out to replace prosecutors. In Washington and at least six other states, it now appears, U.S. attorneys were fired or considered for firing as Republicans in those states urged investigations or prosecutions of alleged Democratic voter fraud.
LINK
Do I expect any of this to “prove” to you that these attorneys were fired because they refused to pursue bogus voter fraud cases? No. If you were a normal-minded person i would expect these links would at least cause you to question the rationalizations given by the White House. But you won’t. Your standard for proof of things contrary to your belief system is impossible to reach, and the standard of proof for you to buy stuff that makes you feel good about yourself and your party is so low an ant couldn’t trip over it.
June 1st, 2007 at 7:16 pmWHERE is Voter ID a legitimate issue, except in the minds of vote-suppressing Republicans?
What evidence can you point to that demonstrates the grave threat to our democracy posed by voter fraud?
Any widescale cases that weren’t thrown out by one court or another after they were brought by Republicans?
June 1st, 2007 at 7:19 pmveritas
well you are doing a great service with the concise way you relay the situation. I HOPE all that read it are writing their representatives about this! Im sure they are sick of hearing about it from me!
Im trying to keep the faith and believe in Justice and hope we can solve this before the next election.
They have Palasts evidence, god I hope there’s still enough time to get to the bottom of the ELECTION FRAUD perpetrated on us by this corrupt administration.
June 1st, 2007 at 7:37 pmNOW all their blabber about “voter ID” and “voter fraud” makes sense, they were engaged in NATIONWIDE ELECTION FRAUD
#49,
The comparison is completely accurate. Sorry that you are too “limited” in the intelligence department to understand. Perhaps when you grow up.
For kicks, though, why don’t you list all of the cases of “voter fraud” for the last 10 years. Let’s see, this should be adequate space ( ).
Keep playing with your strawman little boy. But keep your hands out of his pants.
June 1st, 2007 at 7:38 pmtimmythetool
NOT ONE of the turmped up “voter fraud” cases you clowns brought forward had any MERIT and were overturned by higher courts for ahving NO EVIDENCE.
It was all a cover attempt to hid the Rethugs NATIONWIDE VOTER FRAUD scheme cooked up by you sleaze ball cheaters.
June 1st, 2007 at 7:58 pmbut we caught ya!
timmy sounds like michael troll. No real substance to the posts, just inane questions.
June 1st, 2007 at 8:01 pmJust saying.
Definition of inane:
1 : EMPTY, INSUBSTANTIAL
2 : lacking significance, meaning, or point : SILLY
Fits most of the trolls actually, heh
June 1st, 2007 at 8:10 pmTimmy, stop bugging the grown ups and go out and play. Dinner will be ready soon.
June 1st, 2007 at 9:30 pmDo these people have any sense of decency or shame?
June 2nd, 2007 at 2:44 amHe won’t remember anything, anyway.
# 71. No they don’t. Not one iota of either.
June 2nd, 2007 at 12:07 pm