# 71. No they don’t. Not one iota of either.

Fits most of the trolls actually, heh

NOT ONE of the turmped up “voter fraud” cases you clowns brought forward had any MERIT and were overturned by higher courts for ahving NO EVIDENCE.

It was all a cover attempt to hid the Rethugs NATIONWIDE VOTER FRAUD scheme cooked up by you sleaze ball cheaters.
but we caught ya!

The comparison is completely accurate. Sorry that you are too “limited” in the intelligence department to understand. Perhaps when you grow up.

For kicks, though, why don’t you list all of the cases of “voter fraud” for the last 10 years. Let’s see, this should be adequate space ( ).

Keep playing with your strawman little boy. But keep your hands out of his pants.

well you are doing a great service with the concise way you relay the situation. I HOPE all that read it are writing their representatives about this! Im sure they are sick of hearing about it from me!

Im trying to keep the faith and believe in Justice and hope we can solve this before the next election.

They have Palasts evidence, god I hope there’s still enough time to get to the bottom of the ELECTION FRAUD perpetrated on us by this corrupt administration.
NOW all their blabber about “voter ID” and “voter fraud” makes sense, they were engaged in NATIONWIDE ELECTION FRAUD

What evidence can you point to that demonstrates the grave threat to our democracy posed by voter fraud?

Any widescale cases that weren’t thrown out by one court or another after they were brought by Republicans?

Comment by timmy — June 1, 2007 @ 6:39 pm

Yet you HAVE seen enough proof to tell you that voter fraud is a huge problem, huh?

Do some research, Timmeh.

“John McKay of Washington state, who had decided two years earlier not to bring voter fraud charges that could have undermined a Democratic victory in a closely fought gubernatorial race, said White House counsel Harriet Miers and her deputy, William Kelley, “asked me why Republicans in the state of Washington would be angry with me.”

McKay was later fired.

“Florida and Colorado bring to nine the number of closely contested election states where the Bush administration set out to replace prosecutors. In Washington and at least six other states, it now appears, U.S. attorneys were fired or considered for firing as Republicans in those states urged investigations or prosecutions of alleged Democratic voter fraud.

LINK

Do I expect any of this to “prove” to you that these attorneys were fired because they refused to pursue bogus voter fraud cases? No. If you were a normal-minded person i would expect these links would at least cause you to question the rationalizations given by the White House. But you won’t. Your standard for proof of things contrary to your belief system is impossible to reach, and the standard of proof for you to buy stuff that makes you feel good about yourself and your party is so low an ant couldn’t trip over it.

out too…it’s a juvenile’s game.

Comment by labs

Do you care about voter fraud?

out too…it’s a juvenile’s game.

Comment by veritas

Bye-Come back when you can form an intelligent thought.

Comment by veritas

I agree that it is an issue, but so is voter ID. Why can’t you get that?

Comment by veritas

So you do not think people voting should be required to prove they are who they say they are?

Comment by veritas

Is this thread not about voter fraud? I am bringing up a valid point and the left just wants to blame big bad republicans for everything rather than address issues.

Comment by veritas

What is a “concern troll”?