Think Progress

14:

By Amanda Terkel on Jun 3rd, 2007 at 5:49 pm

14:

Number of U.S. troops killed during “three deadly days in Iraq. … The deaths raised to at least 3,493 members of the U.S. military who have died since the war started in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count.”



55 Responses to “14:”

  1. Jake says:

    God bless the families and friends left behind.


  2. heyzeus says:

    what about the fellow soldiers still coping with the violence, jake, any blessings available for them?


  3. chartreuse dog says:

    Support the troops. End the war.


  4. Jake says:

    I already pray from them and the President every day.


  5. unbelievable says:

    God bless the families and friends left behind.
    Comment by Jake — June 3, 2007 @ 5:53 pm>/em>

    Because that works so well for them?

    Another failed Republican strategy – pray and do nothing else… (hint: You gotta do the something else because prayer doesn’t work).


  6. heyzeus says:

    Doesn’t seem like your prayers are working very well…..


  7. old hack says:

    check out my new tune i recorded over memorial weekend.

    “Have you heard about the war?”

    http://www.myspace.com/oldhack

    “3500 to none lets go kill some just for fun
    dont be afraid to die even if its for a lie

    we say suicide bomber
    they say death befor dishonor.

    youll like it i hope.


  8. unbelievable says:

    I already pray from them and the President every day.
    Comment by Jake — June 3, 2007 @ 6:06 pm

    And look how well that’s going…

    Stop praying and start doing something. Like suiting up and joining the military (we know you’re only 25).


  9. Larry from C says:

    THE BIG STORY this week is Greg Palast handing over evidence of Republican voter caging of minorities to Judiciary Committee head John Conyers. (Full story/picture GregPalast.com)

    Greg Palast said on Randi Rhodes’ show on Friday that this story is headlining Newscasts around the world. It is not even being mentioned in the U.S.

    Tim Griffin, Karl Rove’s former right-hand man resigned immediately on Thursday. The evidence Greg Palast submitted ties him to the alleged crime. The media reporter the former. But not the latter.

    The big question is does this evidence also ensnare Karl Rove? It may.

    Please contact any and all media and DEMAND coverage of this story. If we don’t they’ll ignore it like so many other stories that could’ve delivered the knockout blow to Bushco.


  10. LandSurveyor says:

    Pharisees inquire if dead people were Christian. And they wear they’re prayers on their sleeves and bumper stickers and their comments when they troll. Jake the Pharisee. Yeah I know, you’re not a Pharisee. Phharisees didn’t know they were Pharisees, either. 2 bad 4 u.

    Occupation


  11. profmarcus says:

    on friday, juan cole provided a gruesome summary

    122 US troops died in Iraq in May, the worst total since late 2004.

    A radical Salafi group in Baghdad claimed to have killed two US embassy employees, a husband and a wife, after robbing them of large sums. The US embassy will only say that the two are missing. An AP cameraman was shot and killed on Thursday.

    A massive suicide bombing of police recruits in the largely Sunni city of Fallujah west of Baghdad killed 30 and wounded 20 on Thursday, a day when Iraqi authorities announced that almost 100 persons were killed, found dead, or injured [Arabic] in political violence. (Western wire services appear to have put their stories to bed before the full scope of the carnage was apparent.] Five bodies turned up in Mosul; there was a bombing in Baghdad that killed 1 and wounded 3; at least 2 were killed by rocket fire in Tal Afar (link). 29 bodies showed up in Baghdad streets and a lecturer in Fine Arts was shot down in Basra (link).

    it never gets better… it only gets worse…

    And, yes, I DO take it personally

    it never gets better, it only gets worse…


  12. unbelievable says:

    Please contact any and all media and DEMAND coverage of this story. If we don’t they’ll ignore it like so many other stories that could’ve delivered the knockout blow to Bushc.
    Comment by Larry from C — June 3, 2007 @ 6:10 pm

    The ratings-whore media seem to be paying attention to what we talk about in blogs like TP, so we should talk about it here as well.

    Thanks for the information, I’ll also put it through my own “town crier” process (emailing it to everyone I know). :D


  13. unbelievable says:

    From Larry’s article:

    “Experts have concluded the caging lists were designed for a mass challenge of voters’ right to cast ballots. The caging lists were heavily weighted with minority voters including homeless individuals, students and soldiers sent overseas.”

    Seriously, what hasn’t the left been right about? We have known this. Glad to see there may be proof coming forward.


  14. heyzeus says:

    thanks, Larry from C!


  15. Jake says:

    LandSurveyor:

    I was answering a question, not wearing prayers on my sleeve. I wanted to know if Steve Gilliard was a Christian on the other thread because that could go a long ways to comfort friends and family left behind. IIRC some Christians (like Catholics) still pray for the dead.

    Off topic: do you think people who are not legally registered to vote should be allowed to vote nonetheless?


  16. heyzeus says:

    #10…
    it’s just so…
    sad, you see?


  17. Guido the Loving OBGYN says:

    Yeah, Jake the Pharisee. Hi unbelieveable!

    The War is over. Stop the Occupation!


  18. unbelievable says:

    I wanted to know if Steve Gilliard was a Christian on the other thread because that could go a long ways to comfort friends and family left behind.
    Comment by Jake — June 3, 2007 @ 6:20 pm

    Because you only value a human life if that human believes in Invisible Sky Daddies?

    You’re incorrigible.


  19. Jake says:

    Oh, I thought that LandSurveyor was simply telling us what his / her Occupation was. Thank goodness most Americans don’t want us to lose the war.


  20. Guido the Loving OBGYN says:

    Do not discuss voting with Jake. He is trying to fill the internets with fabricated hysteria. Let’s discuss how many Republicans will perish because they suppress legal voting.


  21. Jake says:

    I think all LEGAL voters should be allowed to vote.


  22. unbelievable says:

    Hi unbelieveable!

    Hi G! :)

    The War is over. Stop the Occupation!
    Comment by Guido the Loving OBGYN — June 3, 2007 @ 6:22 pm

    I’m wondering it there ever was a war, or if the whole thing, from day one was just an occupation sold as a war?


  23. Tom3 says:

    Please don’t feed the trolls.

    They’re idiots with nothing to say.


  24. brando says:

    Jake, it’s not a war, but an occupation. You idiot. MOST Americans want to have NO part of an occupation of Iraq, policing a civil war.


  25. Wayne A. Schneider says:

    Larry from C,

    I heard about this one (I get the newsletters from gregpalast.com). I went to the USDOJ website and they make no mention of it, nor does the website for US Attorney Tim Griffin. Of course, since it is unpleasant news, it’s entirely possible that they will be slow to announce it. Too many people’s ears might perk up when they hear, “Tim Griffin, Karl Rove’s protege,” and they might begin to wonder why all of a sudden he’s resigning.


  26. Jake says:

    Well, sure, if you poll Americans if they want us to be involved in Nazi doctor experimentations, they will say “no” to that as well. The AUMF is the legal equivalent to a declaration of war.


  27. Jake says:

    It’s called push-polling.


  28. Larry from C says:

    #25 Wayne and everyone else…If memory serves me correctly, Palast said that 4 million votes were scrubbed in 2004. He estimates that 6 million will be scrubbed in 2008. That’s like starting a football game with the score 14-0 before the opening kickoff. When you combine that with rigged voting machines and exit poll manipulation 2008 starts to look scary.


  29. Jake says:

    Do you think people who are not legally registered to vote should be allowed to vote nonetheless?


  30. Git Me That GD Oil says:

    WHOOP WHOOP WHOOP

    FIGHT ON ANTI OCCUPATION IRAQI RESISTANCE FREEDOM FIGHTERS !!!!

    THE WORLD SUPPORTS YOU IN YOUR FIGHT TO EXTERMINATE THE INVADERS AND OIL STEALERS !!!!!

    WHOOP WHOOP WHOOP

    GET SOME !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  31. Jake says:

    Git Me That GD Oil:

    Are you an American?


  32. WaltTheMan says:

    Jake,
    Do you think people who were legally registered to vote should be disenfrancised illegally? Kathlene Harris did exactly that to over 20,000 voters in Florida in 2000.


  33. justice says:

    ah, the racist jake has another talking point, now they are trying to spread the idea that “illegal immigrants vote” which is patently ridiculous. You clearly have no clue about illegal immigrants. This is the same mindset as thinking alQueda and Hussein had anything to do with each other. You have ZERO understanding of Mexican culture, obviously. There is NO WAY any illegal immigrant would have any desire to vote. There is NO WAY any illegal would want to show up where there are govt. officials or INS will be there. They fear situations like that. Yet another fool spreading disinformation and lies lies lies.
    Now illegals are having to seek sanctuary due to the gestapo tactics that have been going on in this country this year.
    I know you have no capacity for compassion for anyone but your sorry self but YOUR ancestors immigrated, what if THEY were treated like you think these folks should be? Dont bother answering that, I know exactly what you will say


  34. unbelievable says:

    If memory serves me correctly, Palast said that 4 million votes were scrubbed in 2004.
    Comment by Larry from C — June 3, 2007 @ 6:53 pm

    5 million. I just highlighted that part in the article I sent to my email list (I sent them his Buzzflash inteview, adding an update about Goodling, Griffin’s resignation and reminding them that the middle class vote will be targetted when they are done with the Poor, Blacks and Hispanics)


  35. unbelievable says:

    The small handful of illegals who were registered to vote, were actually registered Republican…


  36. labs says:

    ya just have to love repuke piety…it soothes any vestiges of conscience, decency and humanity that might be hanging around. those things can be so annoying!

    they say the words and think it’s enough.


  37. Jake says:

    For the record, I was not referring to illegal aliens above, as there are plenty of U.S. citizens who are not legally registered to vote as well. If anyone NOT on the “Ignore List” wants to answer my question (”do you think people who are not legally registered to vote should be allowed to vote nonetheless?”), please let me know.



  38. the republic of stupidity says:

    I already pray from them and the President every day.

    Comment by Jake

    Pray FROM them?

    WTF???


  39. Jake says:

  40. TripMaster Monkey says:

    Comment by Jake — June 3, 2007 @ 8:13 pm

    For the record, Shakey, no one here is particularly interested in responding to your ridiculous Straw Man questions. I’d explain further, but as I’m already on your infantile “ignore list” for daring to ask you a question you couldn’t answer, I think I’ll just leave you to reflect on why your “question” isn’t worth responding to.


  41. Kay says:

  42. the republic of stupidity says:

    Do you think people who are not legally registered to vote should be allowed to vote nonetheless?

    Comment by Jake

    Jake, I know it’s illegal, but if poeple had to take an IQ test to vote, you’d be dead meat. Other than yourself, who do you think you’re fooling?


  43. Jake says:

    For the record, the only ways to get on the “Ignore List” are personal attacks (such as “F*#k you” or all the other names I am called) or refusing to answer my question first. If anyone NOT on the “Ignore List” asks a question, I will ALWAYS answer it. Conversely, if someone on the “Ignore List” asks a question, I will not answer it.


  44. TripMaster Monkey says:

    For the record, Jake is a liar.

    Here’s Jake’s alleged reasoning for placing me on the “ignore list”:

    Jake sez:

    (for instance, in the tobacco thread below, TripMaster Monkey refused to answer how the outcome of that trial would have been different).

    I can only assume you’re referring to this thread, Jake, since you seem unable to substantiate your claims with links.

    Please point out the post where you asked me “how the outcome of that trial would have been different”.

    I’ll wait…

    Now that you’re back with nothing to show, perhaps you’ll retract your false accusations…although I know better than to give you that much credit.

    Here’s the difficult question, that actually anded me on the “ignore list”.

    I’ll post it again, for everyone’s benefit.

    Jake, explain this canard (if you’re able). How exactly will forcing White House advisors to testify under oath impair the President’s ability to receive effective advice…unless you’re including advice to commit crimes within that range.

    To paraphrase the anti-privacy crowd, if the administration isn’t doing anything illegal, what exactly does it have to hide?

    I look forward to your reply.

    Two things:

    One: Jake ignored me at first, and then claimed to have posted a response, which was subsequently ‘disappeared’ by the TP editors. I replied that this was rather unlikely, and, even if it were true, why didn’t he simply post the answer again? After all, Jake seems to pride himself upon answering questions…he asks often enough if anyone has any for him…

    Two: This post occurred on the same day as the tobacco thread Jake mentioned earlier. Since his stated reason for placing me on the “ignore list” was that I didn’t answer a question he never asked, and since I have proof that I asked him a question he subsequently deliberately evaded, it seems overwhelmingly likely that I’m actually on the “ignore list” because Jake is afraid to debate further with me. I’d be willing to wager that asking Jake questions he can’t answer, and pointing out his lies, are the only two reasons for inclusion in The List â„¢.

    I hope this clears up any lingering confusion on this issue.

    We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread.


  45. Jake says:

    For the record, TMM was placed on the “Ignore List” prior to that question ( which I have answered anyways, to wit “Subsequent Presidential advisors will be forced to independently evaluate their advice, and therefore may not give perfectly legal advice out of an abundance of caution, which will not provide the next President with a full range of available options”). If anyone NOT on the “Ignore List” has questions about any of this, let me know.


  46. RUCerious says:

    A certain poster, who shall remain unnamed, continues to stand up straw men in a vain attempt to lure others into immortal kombat.
    Ain’t happenin, jackass.


  47. heyzeus says:

    Not sure if I’m on your Ignor-ant List or not, little jake turkey, in any event I have no questions to ask you.
    You answered the one question I might have asked you a long time ago!


  48. Wayne A. Schneider says:

    #47, do you mean Voldemort? :-) Or someone who has almost the same name as I do – shall we call him “Predictable J”?


  49. Jane E. Schneider says:

    Oops, I forgot that Wayne was posting before me–D’OH!! :(


  50. TripMaster Monkey says:

    Jake sez:

    For the record, TMM was placed on the “Ignore List” prior to that question

    That’s not what you said on that day, Shakey.

    And your “answer” only begs the question.

    You’re busted, Shakey. Everyone can see you for exactly what you are (not that they needed my help).


  51. RUCerious says:

    Hey Wayne!
    Upon further reflection, it could be applied to lots of the asswipe trolls lately, but I was referring to the “who should be allowed to vote” strawthingy.


  52. Mistress Z says:

    We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread.
    Comment by TripMaster Monkey

    For the record, Jake ignores his Ignore List.


  53. Jay Randal says:

    Bush does not care how many US soldiers die daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly. He only cares about the OIL in Iraq and nothing else.


  54. Squonk says:

    And Smirky just keeps on smirking.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll