They all look alike to Fox News.
By on Jun 4th, 2007 at 9:54 pm
They all look alike to Fox News.
Fox covers the indictment of Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) by showing images of Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), who also happens to be African American.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
you’ve got to be kidding me!
June 4th, 2007 at 9:57 pmyeah… so…
June 4th, 2007 at 10:01 pmI think it was actually a warning shot directed towards Conyers, who keeps pushing forward on the Attorney/voter suppression scandal.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:01 pmThis would not be the first time they pulled such shite. Remember when they repeatedly referred to the Page-molesting Republican Florida Congressman as a “Democrat.”
June 4th, 2007 at 10:04 pmOh my lord…you can’t make up this shit.
At what point does FOX’s repeated violations become so egregious that they can no longer legally call themselves a “news” channel?
June 4th, 2007 at 10:05 pmFOX did this intentionally. They know the difference between Conyers and Jefferson. Many Americans have seen Conyers on TV, so if you mention Jefferson and show Conyers, then it is character assassination.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:05 pmFaux News knows better. So it was intentional propaganda.
How can Democrats of any color consider participating in a Presidential “debate” sponsored by Fox Propaganda as anything but an own goal?
June 4th, 2007 at 10:07 pmquestion is, intentional or not, will they issue an apology? My guess, no.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:10 pmConyers and Jefferson look nothing alike, so FOX did a dirty thing.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:12 pmI say take Fox at face value, so to speak. They may not be doing this intentionally. At best, they are just completely incompetent as a news organization. Remember, I said “at best.”
June 4th, 2007 at 10:16 pmConyers has a successful lawsuit if he intends to pursue it. Of course, a shitheel station like Fox news would intentionally do such a deceitful thing – you can take that to the bank! What they fail to realize is that Conyers has a slander suit against them now if he desires to proceed. It’s called “defamation of character” and whether it was intentional or not is irrelevant. He can claim besmerchment of character by the oversight (or intentional slander, as the case may be). If I were Conyers, I’d rub their disgusting faces in it and “go for the gusto”.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:16 pm#8 – it’s still called “defamation of character” or slander regardless of whether it was intentional or unintentional.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:17 pmNext time they show a picture of OReally, they should substitute Adolf Hitler. They all look alike.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:17 pmAs for any “real” damage it may have done to Conyers, who watches this piece of crap station any longer anyway? They’re irrlevant and incompetent and this is more evidence to add to the avalanche of deceitful crap emanating from that hapless station.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:18 pmWhy would anyone with a modicum of intelligence watch Fox news anyway?
June 4th, 2007 at 10:19 pmOf course Fox knows the difference — this is deliberate irresponsibility and false reporting — they will say “ooops” and proceed as if this is nothing to clarify much less apologize.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:20 pmConyers should file a lawsuit against FOX news for defamation of character and sue Rupert Murdoch the owner of FOX network too.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:21 pmFox News responds ‘It is difficult for us to tell the tarbaby spearchuckers apart. We will do better next time.’
They should have their license revoked for repeated errors like this. Maybe some FCC complaints?
June 4th, 2007 at 10:21 pmDid they every apologize to Obama?
Craig Crawford just called Osama, “Obama” on the Scarbrough Show, which I have decided I cannot watch any longer.
I wish it were John Conyers too, or at least John Lewis.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:21 pmWhich one is it then: defamation or irrelevant?
June 4th, 2007 at 10:23 pmIt can’t be April 1st again. Ha FoxNews Ha?
June 4th, 2007 at 10:24 pmAm I surprised? No.
Disgusted? Yes.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:26 pmI have told several Democrat members of Congress, in the past, that FOX news should have its broadcasting license revoked, so this is another chance to yank their license and force FOX into bankruptcy.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:26 pmJake sez:
This one is stupid even by your terminally stupid standards, Shakey. No one said this was “irrelevant”.
Go to bed. You’re clearly overtired.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:32 pmSince they keep getting shit mixed up, perhaps a fitting penalty would be to have an anagram contest, then force them to change their name to:
Sox Fewn
Newf oxs
nox wefs
or just plain neocon propoganda station.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:34 pm“As for any “real†damage it may have done to Conyers, who watches this piece of crap station any longer anyway? They’re irrlevant . . . “
June 4th, 2007 at 10:34 pmmichael sez:
Every day is Fool’s Day at FOX “news”.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:34 pmThis is a lose-lose for Fox.
Either they are grossly incompetent, or they are deliberately slandering John Conyers.
Fox needs to lose their license.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:35 pmSeems like this presents a great opportunity to the Democrats who haven’t yet found the balls to cancel out on the Faux Noise/CBC Democratic debate.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:39 pmIn addition, whether the alleged defamation was intentional or not is indeed relevant where a public official was defamed — such a plaintiff has to prove not just that an untruthful statement was made, but also that it was made with “actual malice” — that is, with knowledge of falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth — see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan
June 4th, 2007 at 10:40 pmKinda like when CNN put that big “X” over the screen on Cheney, right?
June 4th, 2007 at 10:44 pmFOX News has at least “shown its colors”. Everybody knows what FOX News is about. And be careful of sending questioning emails to Fox News.
I did that back in late 2004 because of a “Growling Dog ” tv ad. That ad, according to a local newspaper, ran on Fox TV. That ad depicted that TEXAS Prosecutor, who “tackled” Mr. DeLay after the House Ethics Committee missed, as a big black growling dog.
I sent emails to both the maker of the ad and the tv station. Neither responded with letter head but after that my emails went from about three a month to many times that in a day.
I spent the next year to year and a half fighting viruses (I killed some and my ISP killed some), bogus spam and unsolicited adult materials. Truly the Internet has a comfort zone for everyone, for the GOOD, for the BAD and for the UGLY. And anyone can play any role at any time.
And you might want to compare “Fox/Opinion Dynamics” polling numbers for the President’s job approval rating at pollingreport.com. Sometimes there is an eye crossing difference between Fox and the rest of the polls.
But FOX’s performance is not stealthed. You know to view FOX critically. No faith.
June 4th, 2007 at 10:56 pmAt what point does FOX’s repeated violations become so egregious that they can no longer legally call themselves a “news†channel?
Comment by TripMaster Monkey — June 4, 2007 @ 10:05 pm
I’m sure that you meant this as a rhetorical question, as pretty much ALL the MSM outlets are in business now for entertainment – with a few exceptions; mainly PBS & NPR, and Obermann. Actually, it’s pretty obvious that Obermann is also purely entertainment too – but his heart is in the right place.
June 4th, 2007 at 11:00 pm#8 – it’s still called “defamation of character†or slander regardless of whether it was intentional or unintentional.
Comment by veritas — June 4, 2007 @ 10:17 pm
Actually, it isn’t any of those things. It’s called “human error,” and this type of thing happens all the time.
Was there an apology when they covered Tony Blair’s resignation and ran a headline saying something like “Bush Resigns”?
June 4th, 2007 at 11:09 pmKinda like when CNN put that big “X†over the screen on Cheney, right?
Comment by Jake — June 4, 2007 @ 10:44 pm
Exactly right, nuncle.
June 4th, 2007 at 11:13 pmOh, Mr. President, you big hunk of man-meat, you.
June 4th, 2007 at 11:17 pmOh, Jake, how I’ve longed for this moment…
Did I ever tell you how much I like the sparkle in your eyes when you skewer libbies?
June 4th, 2007 at 11:18 pmPresident LOL be careful Jake might be horny.
June 4th, 2007 at 11:22 pmSurprised no! Fox is in bed with the Repuklicans
June 4th, 2007 at 11:22 pmI’m so outraged! This is it!
We must impeach now!
Al run Al help!
I take it that means you aren’t going to tell us what exactly you are “president” of?
June 4th, 2007 at 11:23 pmActually, Fox could run a head line of “Blair Resigns” and show a picture of Bush and the Brits would totally get it.
June 4th, 2007 at 11:24 pmJesus H Christ….f*cking trolls….
June 4th, 2007 at 11:24 pmOK, the jig is up. Who’s usin’ m’name?
huh… huh…
Shane, I’m looking in your direction….
June 4th, 2007 at 11:29 pmAs a matter of fact, Yes I do ‘own’ the air waves in the US and I’m getting GD tired of fox and am thinking of not renewing their lease.
Doc Lee
June 4th, 2007 at 11:35 pmIt was probably John “Ooga booga” Gibson’s idea of a “funny” joke.
After all, he’s the self-professed whitest guy in the world and proud of it.
June 4th, 2007 at 11:37 pmJesus H Christ….f*cking trolls….
Comment by Zooey
Zooey gettin’ a littl’ ole time religion….
June 4th, 2007 at 11:55 pmZooey gettin’ a littl’ ole time religion….
Comment by Flaco
And limp dick’s gettin’ nothin.
June 5th, 2007 at 12:02 amdefinately defamation to depict him as someone who is being indicted on bribery charges!
June 5th, 2007 at 12:07 amthat is an ourtage, there is no way that was an accident
justice:
But, I thought it WAS an accident when CNN put that big “X†over the screen on Cheney’s face?
June 5th, 2007 at 12:19 am“They all look alike to…”
TP is a racist website.
June 5th, 2007 at 12:27 amTom3 where are u homo hater?
June 5th, 2007 at 12:29 amI’m so outraged! This is it!
June 5th, 2007 at 12:33 amWe must impeach now!
Al run Al help!
Flaco, you love you some racist Fox News so shut your hole. You are nothing but a racist little trailer dweller.
June 5th, 2007 at 12:34 amTom3 ur boyfriend valinutpenusinhisanus is here to defend you.
June 5th, 2007 at 12:36 amHe wants u to come out of the closet for him he is looking for a rim licker like you.
“Fox covers the indictment of Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) by showing images of Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), who also happens to be African American. June 4, 2007 9:54 pm | Comment ”
So what!
June 5th, 2007 at 12:47 am“I’m so outraged! This is it!
We must impeach now!
Al run Al help!
Comment by Flaco — June 5, 2007″
What’s Lover Story algore going to do?
June 5th, 2007 at 12:48 amSo not what, Michelle?
June 5th, 2007 at 12:49 am“And limp dick’s gettin’ nothin.
Comment by Zooey — June 5, 2007″
Teach you to talk like that in your 6th grade public school class? When will you grow up?
June 5th, 2007 at 12:51 amLook where michael, the racist Fox lover, shows up.
Surprise, surprise!
June 5th, 2007 at 12:52 amTeach you to talk like that in your 6th grade public school class? When will you grow up?
Comment by michael
When will you stop being stupid?
Oh right….never.
June 5th, 2007 at 12:54 amMikey, can you ask another stupid question…please?
June 5th, 2007 at 12:58 am“Look where michael, the racist Fox lover”
Well, the big difference between you and me is I have some intelligence, you have very little! Let me explain…..you accuse me of being a Fox listener and don’t have a clue who or if I listen to Fox. But that is the left’s response to everything! Blame it on Fox! They command the Cable News because their viewers believe and trust them! They should listen to Kieth? I’ll leave him to you dopes!
June 5th, 2007 at 1:00 am“When will you stop being stupid?
Oh right….never.
Comment by Zooey — June 5, 2007″
zooey, sooner or later you have to learn that to earn any credibility, you need to provide examples when you make stupid charges! Until then, anyone who listens to you, remains in my opinion, pathetic!
June 5th, 2007 at 1:03 amThey should listen to Kieth? I’ll leave him to you dopes!
Comment by michael
You have intelligence? K-E-I-T-H. That’s how it’s spelled.
Are you denying you watch Fox? You must be enbarrassed, huh?
C’mon, more stupid!! Bring it on!
June 5th, 2007 at 1:06 amzooey, sooner or later you have to learn that to earn any credibility, you need to provide examples when you make stupid charges! Until then, anyone who listens to you, remains in my opinion, pathetic!
Comment by michael
Here’s one example of stupid.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:06 am“zooey, sooner or later you have to learn that to earn any credibility, you need to provide examples when you make stupid charges!”
(a) You lecturing anyone on ‘credibility’ is truly amusing.
(b) Your commentary betrays your brainwashing. No further evidence is required.
(c) Back to topic: Fox News is completely full of bullmichael.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:07 am“Mikey, can you ask another stupid question…please?
Comment by JPark — June 5, 2007″
What’s wrong jpark? Nothing intelligent to say? Resort to liberal insults instead of engaging me in debate? Want to take a shot at me?
June 5th, 2007 at 1:08 am“Well, the big difference between you and me is I have some intelligence, ”
No, Mikey, you don’t.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:09 am“Here’s one example of stupid.
Comment by Zooey — June 5, 2007″
Where? Stupid!
June 5th, 2007 at 1:09 am“zooey, sooner or later you have to learn that to earn any credibility,”
Do you want to take a poll on who has more credibility, you or Zooey? I would be all to happy to moderate.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:10 amWhat’s wrong jpark? Nothing intelligent to say? Resort to liberal insults instead of engaging me in debate? Want to take a shot at me?
Comment by michael
Here’s another example of stupid.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:10 amMikey, you are an idiot. Why do you keep embarassing yourself. Zooey owns your pathetic a$$.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:11 amWhere? Stupid!
Comment by michael
Yet another example of stupid. This one’s a really good one, michael.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:11 amGood job.
“What’s wrong jpark? Nothing intelligent to say? Resort to liberal insults instead of engaging me in debate? Want to take a shot at me?”
Are you joking? You have never said anything intelligent. You have insisted on asking stupid questions. You deserve all the insults that you have brought upon yourself. You are an idiot and I am debasing myself by actually responding to you.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:13 amMikey, you are an idiot. Why do you keep embarassing yourself. Zooey owns your pathetic a$$.
Comment by JPark
I love it. He keeps asking, Where? Where? Heh.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:14 am“(a) You lecturing anyone on ‘credibility’ is truly amusing.
(b) Your commentary betrays your brainwashing. No further evidence is required.
(c) Back to topic: Fox News is completely full of bullmichael.
Comment by gorn by any other name — June 5, 2007″
Jesus! All this blubber and not ONE example to back up this liberal NONSENSE!
June 5th, 2007 at 1:15 amTP is to trolls as Democrats are to the Bush administration.
Ineffective, impotent, and unable to affect change.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:18 am” You have insisted on asking stupid questions”
Can you provide ONE example?
“You deserve all the insults that you have brought upon yourself. You are an idiot and I am debasing myself by actually responding to you.
The rest of your diatribe is certainly not based on fact but actually based on fear of debating me. If I am wrong, step up to the plate and be a man or woman?
Comment by JPark — June 5, 2007
June 5th, 2007 at 1:19 amJesus! All this blubber and not ONE example to back up this liberal NONSENSE!
Comment by michael
Excellent. That’s the most brilliantly stupid thing of the evening!
You get a gold star for your calendar. But just one! Try again tomorrow, and you might get two.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:20 am“Jesus! All this blubber and not ONE example to back up this liberal NONSENSE!”
You’re an amazing parody of yourself. You claim that one must provide back up for their observations YET you claim what I said was “liberal nonsense”. I didn’t say anything “liberal” in my post, thus it is YOU who make a statement without any back up.
I know this will be lost on you, but what the hell. Troll-kicking can be fun.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:21 amThe rest of your diatribe is certainly not based on fact but actually based on fear of debating me. If I am wrong, step up to the plate and be a man or woman?
Comment by michael
Oh my, keep it up michael, you might get that gold star afterall!
Which would your prefer JPark be? Man or woman? I take it you’ll be whatever he isn’t, is that right?
June 5th, 2007 at 1:22 amRepeat – TP is to trolls as Democrats are to the Bush administration.
Ineffective, impotent, and unable to affect change.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:22 amRepeat again – TP is to trolls as Democrats are to the Bush administration.
Ineffective, impotent, and unable to affect change.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:23 am“I love it. He keeps asking, Where? Where? Heh.
Comment by Zooey — June 5, 2007″
And you NEVER have an answer! Are you really that stupid to leave yourself open to that? I think everyone on this blog, including liberals, have a blood rush to their faces , for you, when we engage! Why? You’re a dope!
June 5th, 2007 at 1:23 amRepeat again again – TP is to trolls as Democrats are to the Bush administration.
Ineffective, impotent, and unable to affect change.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:23 amFor me, this only heightens my distrust of Fox News. They whine and cry that they are not getting the respect they deserve, and yet, they cannot pass up each and every opportunity that comes along to pull a school-boy prank.
For people who don’t know the difference between Conyers and Jefferson, Jefferson is the one who who is has all of the personality of “Lurch” on the Adaams Family. His expression is always that of a person who has just been sentenced to life in prison.
Probably just a coincidence.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:24 am†You have insisted on asking stupid questionsâ€-me
Can you provide ONE example? -Mikey
Are you kidding me????
June 5th, 2007 at 1:24 amRepeat again – TP is to trolls as Democrats are to the Bush administration.
Ineffective, impotent, and unable to affect change.
Comment by gorn by any other name
Especially their weakest representatives, such as our mikey.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:24 amZooey, I am not sure I could debate such a fake. He might be right!!
June 5th, 2007 at 1:25 amMikey, Zooey has already handed you your a$$. Are you really that masochistic?
June 5th, 2007 at 1:26 am“Which would your prefer JPark be? Man or woman? I take it you’ll be whatever he isn’t, is that right?
Comment by Zooey — June 5, 2007″
I want you zooey! But you know what? I already have you, and most intelligent people see that! You defer from any challenge I have with dopey 6th grade responses. Even though I consider liberals idiots, they’re not that stupid that they can’t see your emptiness!
June 5th, 2007 at 1:27 amZooey, I am not sure I could debate such a fake. He might be right!!
Comment by JPark
michael never debates anyone. I finally gave him a serious topic, the death penalty, and let him go first. He kicked his own ass before I got a word in. Frickin’ amazing…..
I’m outta here. If michael puts up another stupid question, give him that second gold star.
Goodnight, JPark. :)
June 5th, 2007 at 1:29 am“Mikey, Zooey has already handed you your a$$. Are you really that masochistic?
Comment by JPark — June 5, 2007″
WHERE?
June 5th, 2007 at 1:29 amMikey, you really aren’t very bright. Zooey has destroyed you a hundred times. I am still shocked that you are so sexist that you can’t see that. No…actually I am not surprised at all.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:29 amLOL, 6th grade responses says Mikey. What??? You can’t string a sentence longer than 5 words (with a question mark, whether there should be one or not). Poor pathetic retard.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:31 am“#
Mikey, you really aren’t very bright. Zooey has destroyed you a hundred times. I am still shocked that you are so sexist that you can’t see that. No…actually I am not surprised at all.
Comment by JPark — June 5, 2007″
Example? I won’t hold my breath!
June 5th, 2007 at 1:31 amI want you zooey! But you know what? I already have you, and most intelligent people see that! You defer from any challenge I have with dopey 6th grade responses. Even though I consider liberals idiots, they’re not that stupid that they can’t see your emptiness!
Comment by michael
Here’s the whole box of gold stars, mikey. That is the most stupid thing I have ever read — starting with “I want you zooey!”
Good god, try to have a little dignity.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:31 amMikey, everywhere. Pathetic.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:31 amAye, Mikey is his own worst enemy. Night Zoo.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:32 am“#
Mikey, you really aren’t very bright. Zooey has destroyed you a hundred times. I am still shocked that you are so sexist that you can’t see that. No…actually I am not surprised at all.
Comment by JPark — June 5, 2007″
So, this is your answer?
June 5th, 2007 at 1:34 amMikey, why wouldn’t that be my answer?
June 5th, 2007 at 1:36 am“So, this is your answer?”
Is that yours?
June 5th, 2007 at 1:36 amIn regards to the X over Cheney’s face – anyone who has ever worked in motion graphics, live broadcast and most directly as a live TV producer knows that depending on the editing system if a graphic is missing or unrendered it will be displayed as an X or other crossed out visual to signify it’s absence from the program.
So, there’s a good chance that a flash frame graphic error is a mistake and not intentional slander. Showing the wrong person for the duration of a piece about a criminal investigation is greivious error or slander.
Hope this helps out those who don’t know shit about shit.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:53 amStupid Git, amazing they showed a black Senator instead of the black Representative, isn’t it? I wonder what the statistical probability of that is?
June 5th, 2007 at 1:59 amFox News responds ‘It is difficult for us to tell the tarbaby spearchuckers apart.
Comment by Trevjr — June 4, 2007 @ 10:21 pm
Actually, Fox said nothing of the kind, Trev. You did. True colors showing a little? Got any other little gems like this ya been waiting to use?
June 5th, 2007 at 2:44 amAm I mistaken or wasn’t it the usual Fox hacks who backed the Capitol police in the Cynthia McKinney incident by highlighting her new hairdo as a “legitimate” reason that she wouldn’t be easily recognizable?
June 5th, 2007 at 3:36 am“Mikey, Zooey has already handed you your a$$. Are you really that masochistic?
Comment by JPark — June 5, 2007″
WHERE?
Comment by michael — June 5, 2007 @ 1:29 am
Uh, oh… we might have to wake Zooey up. She handed Michael his ass and now he can’t find it. Oh wait, I see it! It’s over by that hole in ground… Is that the problem, you can’t tell ‘em apart?
June 5th, 2007 at 5:51 amActually “tarbaby” was from a former Fox reporter in reference to a problem rather than a person and “spearchucker” was a reference to man who’s whiter than Brit Hume.
Both comments were used in their more common, non-racist context, yet both were cited as racist by people pretending to be outraged by it.
Great idea really. I mean, what harm could come from legitimising the promotion of non-existant race issues and slurs when it comes to right-wing media outlets like Fox ?
June 5th, 2007 at 6:47 amNothing Faux Noise Network does like this is accidental. It is all carefully calibrated to incite and disinform their rabid viewers, the most conservative, closeminded, hatefilled ignoramus babblying baboons in America, the hardcore 28% remanant of Bushite neocon supporters.
Joseph Goebbels would be very proud to see that the propaganda and media control philosophies and techniques he so valiantly pioneered are thriving in the hands of the owners and talking heads of Faux Noise. Of course can only hope that they all eventually meet the same well deserved fate Goebells and his family met.
June 5th, 2007 at 7:30 amWho owns FOX? Could that be a clue as to FOX’s direction. If the right wing keeps buying up “news” sources, eventually the Bush team will get lots of “good press”.
For the Bush team, good press could mean staying quiet about the ACCOMPLISHMENTS of the Bush team. NONE OF NOTE. It may take years for America to undo what the Bush team has “wrought”.
And I imagine the Bush team would appreciate the “small talk (name calling…etc.) that goes on in some blogs. That means that no one is talking about things like:
(1) Didn’t you just know that the Bush team’s handling of Guantonimo might backfire? It looks likes the military judges might not be able to stomach the Bush team’s “work”. That means it could be that almost 400 detainees may eventually sue America. And America is already living on its CREDIT CARD. The lawyer who was detained made $2,000,000 on his detention – thanks to the Bush team.
(2) The Bush team grabbed outer space and claimed it for its own. The Chinese government shot down its own ageing satellite. The Bush team cried “foul”.
Shortly after the Chinese government “rankled” the Bush team by shooting down its own satellite, there was a newspaper article telling how many American businesses the Chinese could buy with its American investments. That list was significant.
(3) The Bush teams Eastern Europe missile defense may get Russia’s nuclear missiles pointed at Europe. It looks like the Bush team is reviving the Cold War!
(4) And Iraq is worse than ever, but the Bush team is not talking about it. The Red Cross and the United Nations are requesting refugee help from surrounding countries. Syria has taken in some of the refugees.
Those two agencies are calling the Humanitarian conditions bad. But the Bush team is MUM. The Bush team says Iraq is getting better.
Somebody needs to “TELL AMERICA” the truth.
June 5th, 2007 at 8:57 amok since he’s black and a liberal we should ingore the laws he broke?
June 5th, 2007 at 9:36 amI’m delighted Congressman Jefferson has been indicted, and I hope we hear soon why it took so long to make the case and bring charges. I imagine it had to do with the international leads.
Meanwhile, Faux “News” demonstrates again no credibility. If we are to believe this is a mistake, it is a horrendous one. It reflects a severe lack of attention to detail when it reports, and after all, that is what reporting is supposed to do-give us facts, details.
If it was intentional, it simply adds to the gagging confluence of irresponsible, partisan propogandizing which pulverizes their audience with misinformation and lies.
Fair and balanced…in an alternate, opposite, bizzaro universe, maybe.
June 5th, 2007 at 10:12 amok since he’s black and a liberal we should ingore the laws he broke?
Comment by Chris
Look through this thread and see if anyone has said such a thing. You won’t find it.
Try not to be a TOTAL idiot.
June 5th, 2007 at 10:21 amfox news was probably the only one thats covering it
June 5th, 2007 at 10:33 am“fox news was probably the only one thats covering it”
Yes, except EVERY OTHER NEWS OUTLET IN THE COUNTRY.
Jeebus, does every rightie have to be a lying, raging moron?
June 5th, 2007 at 11:04 amThe Fox Opinion Channel doesn’t even deserve this much attention. Let’s worry about stuff that counts instead of crying every time Fox, who has like all of 20 viewers, does something hateful. Only the ones who drank Rove’s cool-aid believe them anymore anyway.
June 5th, 2007 at 12:09 pm