Conservatives claim they are against human cloning. But yesterday, House conservatives blocked passage of a bill to ban reproductive cloning. The Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2007 would have made it illegal to clone a human being. The AP reports:
House Republicans united Wednesday to reject a Democratic-backed bill to ban human reproductive cloning, a prelude to the larger battle this week over the federal funding of stem cell research. […]
Only 14 of 196 voting Republicans supported it. Among Democrats, 190 of the 221 voting were for it.
The bill, hastily added to the House agenda Wednesday, makes it illegal to use cloning technology to initiate a pregnancy and create a cloned human being. Violators would be subject to up to 10 years in prison and face fines of up to $10 million.
Human cloning is overwhelmingly opposed by the American people. A Gallup poll last week found that 86 percent of the public opposes it. Human cloning is also banned in several other countries, including Britain and Australia.
Conservatives torpedoed the bill because it does not ban the use of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) to create embryonic stem cells, which is often called therapeutic cloning. They argue that SCNT, which is legal, constitutes human cloning, because they consider the embryo-like entity it produces to be a human being.
Strong support for embryonic stem cell research continues to show, however, that the majority of Americans do not consider embryos to be human beings. SCNT would allow scientists to create patient-specific stem cells, which would greatly aid disease study and drug development, and also vastly reduce the risk of transplant rejection for clinic use of embryonic stem cells. Conservatives have been actively opposing SCNT at the state level, including Kansas, Missouri, and Iowa.
The public support for this research has been strong when the distinction is properly made between reproductive cloning and SCNT. A Republican pollster found that 69 percent of Kansas voters and 66 percent of Missouri voters support SCNT, and a 2005 poll found that 69 percent of Americans support SCNT.
Right-wing opposition to this popular and useful research has prevented Congress from banning human cloning.
So, what other stipulations or regulations were in the bill?
June 7th, 2007 at 8:08 pmWhy? Because they may lose a wedge issue?
June 7th, 2007 at 8:11 pmSo, what other stipulations or regulations were in the bill?
Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 8:08 pm
None. They just weren’t satisfied that it didn’t jail closet cases like yourself - whiny little b!tch.
You know at 6″ and 225lbs, someone could separate you into your own clone - f*t*ss.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:12 pmThis is easy to figure. The Republicans need to clone themselves some voters.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:14 pmI still don’t get the big deal about cloning. It’s not that much different from regular breeding… The end result is a baby.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:15 pmthese people are just a sham. Whether you like or hate “conservative”, there’s really almost none left in D.C.
These neo-cons - I don’t even know WHAT to classify them as!
Some interesting follow up reading:
“Where Have all the Conservatives Gone?”
June 7th, 2007 at 8:16 pmhttp://www.populistamerica.com/ where_have_all_the_conservatives_gone
You know at 6″ and 225lbs, someone could separate you into your own clone - f*t*ss.
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — June 7, 2007 @ 8:12 pm
Not a bad idea there, VVGFU.
I’ll Clone Myself!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
June 7th, 2007 at 8:19 pmSo, what other stipulations or regulations were in the bill?
Comment by Mr. President
The Cons probably wanted to add the exception to clone Ronnie Raygun =P
June 7th, 2007 at 8:20 pmOf course, if they can’t convince the majority of Americans to get behind them, just clone Karl Rove a few hundred times - problem solved.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:20 pm#9 - meant a few hundred thousand times…
June 7th, 2007 at 8:22 pmCould we at least ban cloning of VVGU’s ‘Project Much?’
Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?
June 7th, 2007 at 8:22 pmYou know at 6″ and 225lbs, someone could separate you into your own clone - f*t*ss.
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — June 7, 2007 @ 8:12 pm
Dude, why do you even remember that?
Ha!
June 7th, 2007 at 8:23 pmIsn’t it rich?
Are we a pair?
Me here at last on the ground,
You in mid-air.
Send in the clones.
Isn’t it bliss?
Don’t you approve?
One who keeps tearing around,
One who can’t move.
Where are the clones?
Send in the clones.
Just when I’d stopped opening doors,
Finally knowing the one that I wanted was yours,
Making my entrance again with my usual flair,
Sure of my lines,
No one is there.
Don’t you love farce?
My fault I fear.
I thought that you’d want what I want.
Sorry, my dear.
But where are the clones?
Quick, send in the clones.
Don’t bother, they’re here.
Isn’t it rich?
Isn’t it queer,
Losing my timing this late
In my career?
And where are the clones?
There ought to be clones.
Well, maybe next year.
(With apologies to S. Sondheim)
June 7th, 2007 at 8:23 pmCould we at least ban cloning of VVGU’s ‘Project Much?’
Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 8:22 pm
Oh… Hey CT, what’s up?
June 7th, 2007 at 8:24 pmI am very uncomfortable with cloning, and I think it should be illegal. Just because science is advancing toward a thing, doesn’t mean we have to do there. If we can’t agree on something like stem cell research, then how the hell would we ever agree on cloning.
Humanity is nowhere near being ready for this type of thing.
Just my opinion, of course.
Later, y’all. :)
June 7th, 2007 at 8:24 pmAmerica could use more ‘Mr. President.’ In that case, a more common presence of intelligence and integrity is what we would see.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:26 pmWait! I want to allow cloning! I want to pass a law requiring cloning of Bush, and then draft all the little Bush clones to fight in Bush’s Wars!
Then, when Tony Snow says another death is “just a number” I will be able to agree with him!
June 7th, 2007 at 8:26 pmMr. President, how’s college treating you?
June 7th, 2007 at 8:27 pmLater, y’all. :)
Comment by Zooey — June 7, 2007 @ 8:24 pm
Hey!!!
If you ain’t from da Souf, you caint say “y’all”
no wait, actually, you caint say “cha’ll”
June 7th, 2007 at 8:28 pmNot a bad idea there, VVGFU.
I’ll Clone Myself!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 8:19 pm
You better hope your IQ doesn’t split with your f*t *ss, you already are below the amount where you have any to *spare*.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:29 pmAmerica could use more ‘Mr. President.’ In that case, a more common presence of intelligence and integrity is what we would see.
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 8:26 pm
You mean pedantic st*pid *ssholes, that spout sh*t about stuff they know nothing about? We have plenty of *both* of you - *sshole.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:29 pmMr. President, how’s college treating you?
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 8:27 pm
Pretty good, pretty good.
I’m reading all this Moderist poetry and crap cause they don’t have philosophy courses during the summer.
How you livin’?
June 7th, 2007 at 8:30 pmComment by Briseadh na Faire
I have to admit, that’s quite creative. That may actually reverse TP’s stance.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:30 pmThe end result is a baby.
Comment by unbelievable — June 7, 2007 @ 8:15 pm
Not all the time. Most of the time, it goes horribly wrong, and the end result is a mess.
“The success rate ranges from 0.1 percent to 3 percent…”
http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/units/cloning/cloningrisks/
June 7th, 2007 at 8:30 pmI still don’t get the big deal about cloning. It’s not that much different from regular breeding… The end result is a baby.
Comment by unbelievable
But a baby without a SOUL
June 7th, 2007 at 8:30 pmCould we at least ban cloning of VVGU’s ‘Project Much?’
Project Much? Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 8:22 pm
Sure, but it would require banning your *projections*, (clones of your own fears and self loathing), and also require you to stop *cloning* the talking points from “Central Command”.
Since you aren’t smart enough to think for yourself, and stop *projecting* your own inadequacies (starting with the ones you sit on?) on others - we’re stuck with me pointing out what a st*pid sh*thead that you are. And how all your doing is displaying your OWN-SH*T for the world to see, not criticizing the behavior of others. ST*pid little b!tch.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:31 pmI have to admit, that’s quite creative. That may actually reverse TP’s stance. Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 8:30 pm
A phrase no one is going to post about you “Creative”. Nor will we see, insightful, thoughtful, intellectual, honest, moral or even rational. You st*pid little b!tch.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:32 pmThat should read “Democrat-backed bill.” Looks like the AP overcorrected.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:33 pmBut a baby without a SOUL
Comment by Wilco — June 7, 2007 @ 8:30 pm
Tell that to every twin in the world, that they don’t have a soul. Because that is exactly what a twin is - A CLONE!
June 7th, 2007 at 8:33 pmBut a baby without a SOUL
Comment by Wilco — June 7, 2007 @ 8:30 pm
So if I clone myself… the baby will have even less than no soul?
June 7th, 2007 at 8:33 pmBut a baby without a SOUL
Comment by Wilco — June 7, 2007 @ 8:30 pm
You mean like THIS?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=9jTM4ZOa69U
June 7th, 2007 at 8:33 pmPretty good, pretty good.
I’m reading all this Moderist poetry and crap cause they don’t have philosophy courses during the summer.
How you livin’?
Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 8:30 pm
The f*t*ss idiot, with a dead girlfriend, and self loathing homophobia taking philosophy. You’re one f*cked up loser.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:34 pmTell that to every twin in the world, that they don’t have a soul. Because that is exactly what a twin is - A CLONE!
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — June 7, 2007 @ 8:33 pm
Nah, you’re wrong… hilariously wrong!!!!
Ha!
How old are you, you ignoramus?
June 7th, 2007 at 8:34 pmSo if I clone myself… the baby will have even less than no soul?
Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 8:33 pm
You’ll have a *twin* dum bass. Unless you *eat* him, to avoid facing someone with your DNA growing up that isn’t a f*cking idiot. Then you’d have to admit your st*pidity and failures are of your own “personal responsibility” and homophobia, and not your “dna”.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:35 pmNah, you’re wrong… hilariously wrong!!!!
Ha!
How old are you, you ignoramus?
Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 8:34 pm
B*llsh*t. A twin is nothing more than a clone, you f*cking unscientific idiot. Ask any biologist.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:36 pmComment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — June 7, 2007 @ 8:32 pm
Actually, CT is quite creative. Remember all the notices from the RNC.
You on the other hand couldn’t even come up with an original handle so you stole your name from VV!!!!!!
June 7th, 2007 at 8:36 pmComment by Mr. President
It’s pretty sharp you have an interest in the Arts. In terms of developing a good thinking capacity, it beats the usual yuppie majors like Business and Economics. Are you a major in philosophy or the like? It makes good preparation for grad school, as well.
As soon as I finish my AAS program, I’m thinking about going somewhere to major in Math - applied, hopefully.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:36 pmThe Boys from Brazil
June 7th, 2007 at 8:36 pmThe f*t*ss idiot, with a dead girlfriend, and self loathing homophobia taking philosophy. You’re one f*cked up loser.
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — June 7, 2007 @ 8:34 pm
Dude, you need help.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:37 pmGW BOTCH and his family members are the single, greatest, reason there should BE NO HUMAN (uhhh?, is Botch a human?)… OR SUB-HUMAN(Repugniscums) cloning!!!!
June 7th, 2007 at 8:37 pmComment by ValiantBlahBlahBlah
My god, this kid is a psycho path. You said that some posters on here were sinister, didn’t you?
June 7th, 2007 at 8:37 pmAre you a major in philosophy or the like? It makes good preparation for grad school, as well.
As soon as I finish my AAS program, I’m thinking about going somewhere to major in Math - applied, hopefully.
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 8:36 pm
I actually started with Math but then got into ancient philosophy. I hope to write my dissertation on Plato.
Good luck with the applied Math, you know philosophy can help in all areas of study, you might want to read some of Bertrand Russell’s work.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:41 pmActually, CT is quite creative. Remember all the notices from the RNC. You on the other hand couldn’t even come up with an original handle so you stole your name from VV!!!!!! Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 8:36 pm
CT isn’t creative, he’s st*pid - but I’m not surprised that a rube like you would think *it* is. As for *stealing* a name, if that had been true, I would have chosen to use *her* name - I didn’t. This is in fact a *satirical* name - and a *creative* satire against *her*.
So what does this demonstrate? You don’t recognize or understand what *creativity*, *satire* and *humor* are - but you’re enough a pedantic lunatic to believe you’re the “master” of all three. You’re a loser, a f*t, selfish, st*pid little loser.
Dude, you need help.
Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 8:37 pm
Says the homophobic lunatic, that makes st*pid remarks he *thinks* are jokes.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:41 pmIf they ban cloning, they won’t have any compliant workers or soldiers to send to oil wars.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:41 pmI think the fact that Bono took off his glassess is bigger.
/sarcasm
June 7th, 2007 at 8:42 pmBnf, exactly like that!
June 7th, 2007 at 8:42 pmMy god, this kid is a psycho path. You said that some posters on here were sinister, didn’t you? Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 8:37 pm
BAHAHA, look up the word *psychopath*. When you little f*ckers come here and make fun of the deaths of others, when you show no compassion for the suffering of others. Where you advocate murder, torture and the rest of the *hate* you spew - that’s being a “psychopath” - dum bass.
When someone says, you’re a st*pid little b!tch - BECAUSE YOU ARE, that’s not “psychopathic”. I have not *threatened* you in any manner - except with the greatest of *threats* for a loser wingnut like you. I threatened you with *reality* and the *truth*. Neither of which a loser like you can handle.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:43 pmMy god, this kid is a psycho path. You said that some posters on here were sinister, didn’t you?
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 8:37 pm
Yeah, but not this one. This one isn’t creative enough to come up with anything sinister. He’s just a little yappity at times. The sinister ones are those who come up with conspiracy theories about Bush being behind 9/11 and stuff like that.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:43 pmI actually started with Math but then got into ancient philosophy. I hope to write my dissertation on Plato. Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 8:41 pm
That’s like having Bush write a dissertation on “speech” and “nukular science”!! What an HILARIOUS PROSPECT!!!!
Good luck with the applied Math, you know philosophy can help in all areas of study, you might want to read some of Bertrand Russell’s work.Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 8:41 pm
Unless you’re a f*cking m*r*n like you - in which case it’s only helped you to become a pedantic arrogant little pr!ck.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:44 pmI know you might hate me. But I agree with the stupid Mr. President on comment #1 only.
What other stuff is in the bill?
C’mon, Dems do it too.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:45 pmIt’s pretty sharp you have an interest in the Arts. In terms of developing a good thinking capacity, it beats the usual yuppie majors like Business and Economics. Are you a major in philosophy or the like? It makes good preparation for grad school, as well. Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 8:36 pm
BAHAHAA, how IRONIC!!! A wingnut, admonishing degrees in CAPITALISM!!! And instead promoting a *hippie* major! Where is Valiant Ben Venus when you need to point out who her *fellow* trolls are!! Too FUNNY!!!
As soon as I finish my AAS program, I’m thinking about going somewhere to major in Math - applied, hopefully.
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 8:36 pm
Ah, another arrogant little st*dent that has sucked up the bile of Savage, O’Reilly and Coulter, yet despite getting an education is still too st*pid to think for *itself*! How T*cker Carlson of you - loser!
June 7th, 2007 at 8:46 pmI know you might hate me. But I agree with the stupid Mr. President on comment #1 only.
What other stuff is in the bill?
C’mon, Dems do it too.
Comment by ForTruth — June 7, 2007 @ 8:45 pm
Hey now, no need to be rude… dickeater.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:47 pm“As soon as I finish my AAS program, I’m thinking about going somewhere to major in Math - applied, hopefully.”
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1
As soon as I finish my ASS program, somewhere I’ll be going about thinking what a major Path I’ve hopelessly applied….
(there, fixed it!)
June 7th, 2007 at 8:47 pmComment by Briseadh na Faire — June 7, 2007 @ 8:26 pm
Excellent idea, BnF!
June 7th, 2007 at 8:49 pmI have to say I was trying to send an e-mail to Ms Pelosi, telling her to put the impeachment back on the table. And, I was re-directed 2 times because I was not a constituent of hers, and was commenting on her Speaker position. I thought it was stupid.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:49 pmMaybe we can clone Ronald Reagan and elect him to office again!
June 7th, 2007 at 8:50 pmAnyone who does this:
“(there, fixed it!)
Comment by heyzeus — June 7, 2007 @ 8:47 pm”
is retarded.
The joke is like, two months old, and is not funny any longer, for whatever reason.
I repeat,
Anyone who does this:
“(there, fixed it!)
Comment by heyzeus — June 7, 2007 @ 8:47 pm”
is retarded.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:50 pmYeah, but not this one. This one isn’t creative enough to come up with anything sinister. He’s just a little yappity at times. Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 8:43 pm
So you just said that CT is *creative*, then you imply that sinister=creativity? Talk about a f*cked up world view! As for being yappity - that’s a great description for the *childish* little t*rds of a post you leave *daily*. Lapdog.
The sinister ones are those who come up with conspiracy theories about Bush being behind 9/11 and stuff like that. Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 8:43 pm
Actually what would be *sinister* is if something like 9/11 had been discussed by the NeoCons as an *excuse* to *consolidate* power - in the PNAC Mein Kampf! What’s even more *sinister* is little fascist wingnuts like you that are so *eager* to give up their freedoms at a whim. What’s *sinister* is the most secret government in history, that passes an executive order (Bush did) that says he can declare a national emergency and become *king* george at his discretion.
What you are isn’t so much sinister, as “useless”, “foolish”, “judgmental” and “ignorant”. Dum bass f*t fool.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:51 pmGW BOTCH and his family members are the single, greatest, reason there should BE NO HUMAN (uhhh?, is Botch a human?)… OR SUB-HUMAN (ie. Repugniscums) cloning!!!!
June 7th, 2007 at 8:51 pmMr. President,
You are being stupid. I was genuine with my comment. I’m sure there is something in the bill that Repukes don’t like, and that’s why they are against it. It politics my boy.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:51 pm“Good luck with the applied Math, you know philosophy can help in all areas of study, you might want to read some of Bertrand Russell’s work.”
Mr. President, thanks very much. I’ll take his name down and check out some books/other literature. Back to the math, while I do like it, it can be rather tiring but it can also be a good adrenaline rush to get difficult problems done under pressure, so that’s why I’ve decided to stick to it - maybe even with some higher-level business and technical courses.
(Off topic: Fedex this VVGU psycho a straight-jacket, STAT.)
June 7th, 2007 at 8:52 pmMaybe we can clone Ronald Reagan and elect him to office again!
Comment by m12 — June 7, 2007 @ 8:50 pm
Is he gonna invade latin america again, or forget about it again? Or maybe just sell out his own president to the Iranian mullahs? How about you pull your head out of his “fake” legacy, and join the real world - junior?
June 7th, 2007 at 8:52 pmis retarded.
Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 8:50 pm
Now *that* is a perfect projection of you. Dum bass.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:52 pmRonald Reagan’s DNA is probably still in tact. It can be used to clone him, like in Jurassic Park. He could be mixed with a pig, and come out exactly the same.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:52 pmI’m not picking a “side” at this time. I’m going with pragmatism.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:52 pmHey now, no need to be rude… dickeater.
Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 8:47 pm
Another case of “projection”. You do know there’s about a 90% correlation between homophobia, and the closet - right junior? Your *friends* may not know your *issues* - but we do - sport! Good thing you keep yourself “anonymous”!! You don’t want your friends to be reading this and realize the reason you “pine” over the dead girlfriend is so you can avoid facing another girl, and that messy sex you don’t like! Now would it - sport?
June 7th, 2007 at 8:54 pm“I actually started with Math but then got into ancient philosophy. I hope to write my dissertation on Plato.”
Comment by Mr. President
I actually started with hope on Pluto, but got disconcerted philosophically with ancient written Math.
there, fixed it!
June 7th, 2007 at 8:55 pm(Off topic: Fedex this VVGU psycho a straight-jacket, STAT.)
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 8:52 pm
I can point you to some *explanations* and *resources* for getting help with your pathology - junior! While I exhibit *no* signs of a psychopath - you pretty much have them nailed sport! I hope you aren’t buying any guns like your buddy “Cho” - you know, your fellow *conservative* that hated all of the *liberals*?
June 7th, 2007 at 8:55 pmThey’re going to need this technology to build the reichpig army of the empire.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:56 pmNote to VVGU: A good formal education doesn’t necessarily translate in Left-wing views. Get off of your high-horse, please. Walgreens is open late to process your meds.
Next: Comment by heyzeus
Nevermind. Mr. President already made short work of you, you bummish thug.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:56 pmActually in all honesty, if Reagan would replace Bush, effective immediatly, it would be an improvement.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:57 pmMr. President,
You are being stupid. I was genuine with my comment. I’m sure there is something in the bill that Repukes don’t like, and that’s why they are against it. It politics my boy.
Comment by ForTruth — June 7, 2007 @ 8:51 pm
Looky he-ah, son, and
Mark it, nuncle:
It’s “m’boy”
and calling me stupid was rude.
I have no problem as long as you treat people with respect, calling me stupid is disrespectful and frankly, I thought you were above that.
If you fuk with me, I fuk with you.
It’s reciprocity, dickeater.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:58 pmCom on “Fake” president, explain to me the “biology” again, of why a “Clone” isn’t a “Twin”?
I’m awaiting the resident “Cartman” to explain to us why his f*t*ss shouldn’t be “twinned” to reduce his BIG-BONED-DRAG-COEFFICIENT! Then again, when isn’t *drag* involved with a homophobic little b!tch like Misses President here?
June 7th, 2007 at 8:58 pmI meant to say Reagan would replace the Chympâ„¢, it would be an improvement.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:58 pmComment by ForTruth — June 7, 2007 @ 8:52 pm
But, FT, pigs are supposed to be smart!
June 7th, 2007 at 8:58 pmOh Jeez Mr Pressy, you are right. I should respect you more often.
June 7th, 2007 at 8:59 pmNote to VVGU: A good formal education doesn’t necessarily translate in Left-wing views. Get off of your high-horse, please. Walgreens is open late to process your meds. Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 8:56 pm
You’re right, just like good anti-biotics doesn’t work on every disease, even a good education can’t fix a loser lunatic like yourself. As for getting some more meds - sorry *child*, but you’re the one that needs an anti-dote to your kkkoolaid!
Who’s on the high-horse again? Oh yeah, the f*cking little b!tch conservative that’s so arrogant SHE believes she can come here to *lecture* and *educate* the liberals! I repeat - PROJECT MUCH - dum bass!
Next: Comment by heyzeus
Nevermind. Mr. President already made short work of you, you bummish thug.
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 8:56 pm
Short work? Kind of like *iraq*? You wingnuts are *delusional* st*pid little f*ckers, on the blogs, and in the real world. Catch a clue - loser!
June 7th, 2007 at 9:01 pmAh yes, The Boys From Brazil, Part Doh…
June 7th, 2007 at 9:01 pmI’m shaking in my flip-flops and bermudas man.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:01 pmYou are being stupid. I was genuine with my comment. I’m sure there is something in the bill that Repukes don’t like, and that’s why they are against it. It politics my boy.
So you would agree that the title of this thread is dishonest, at best.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:01 pmComment by heyzeus — June 7, 2007 @ 8:55 pm
Sorry, it’s still retard.
Even without the parenthesis.
By the way, your “fix” doesn’t even make sense.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:02 pmIf you fuk with me, I fuk with you.
It’s reciprocity, dickeater.
Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 8:58 pm
Says the little f*cker that comes here to f*ck with liberals. You should ask your professor sometime about “causality”, because you accept no responsibility for any of your actions - nor do you realize that it is *you* that creates this outcome - unconscious loser!
June 7th, 2007 at 9:02 pmVVGU,
Actually, your Cho buddy spent all of his time bashing rich kids - not exactly a feature of conservatism.
Even the Governor here, Tim Kaine (D-VA) castigated people just like you who made the tragedy a political issue a mere hour after the news broke. You should have the upper hand on no debate. Gun control doesn’t help, by the way. VT already had “gun control” - it was a gun-free zone. STFU.
Oh, and I didn’t know that bashing the passing of someone’s GF didn’t exhibit indiciation of severe psychopathy. Then again, the crazy can’t be reliable for diagnosing themselves.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:02 pmAt least they are not trying to clone human-banning.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:03 pmOh Jeez Mr Pressy, you are right. I should respect you more often.
Comment by ForTruth — June 7, 2007 @ 8:59 pm
Just don’t disrespect me, that’s all I ask.
We cool?
June 7th, 2007 at 9:04 pmComment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 8:58 pm
ForTruth said you were “acting stupid.” Your reply proves that you are STUPID!!
Get over it and move on with your life! Look ahead and seek an edumacashun!!
June 7th, 2007 at 9:04 pmMr. Pressy,
it appears you are getting a bit irritated perhaps, things getting a bit old for you?
June 7th, 2007 at 9:05 pm“causalityâ€
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — June 7, 2007 @ 9:02 pm
Poor, poor fool. Causality doesn’t exist. It hasn’t since David Hume rendered the concept meaningless.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:06 pmComment by CompTROLLER V-1 — Project much? Now I remember where I used to hear that term from rachel b. Hey Zooey, did you ever use Zoo as your moniker?
—–
rachel b,
You and your vile comments will be gone soon. Bye.
Comment by Zoo
Whatever do you mean ?
I am posting within the rules
I will stay
I like it here with all my new found friends
You dont like it ?
You leave
Comment by rachel b — January 10, 2007 @ 7:43 pm
June 7th, 2007 at 9:06 pmVVGU, Actually, your Cho buddy spent all of his time bashing rich kids - not exactly a feature of conservatism. Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 9:02 pm
Actually he railed against materialism and “hedonism” - something that your wingnut religious folks do all of the time. He also compared himself to “jesus”, another trait of you zealot wingnuts. He was also obsessed with writing about gay-sex as hedonism, another trait you yourself exhibit - wingnut.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:07 pmBy the way, your “fix†doesn’t even make sense.
Comment by Mr. President
No sense intended, sir.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:07 pmHappy to annoy you, sir.
Poor, poor fool. Causality doesn’t exist. It hasn’t since David Hume rendered the concept meaningless. Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 9:06 pm
Yeah, there’s no cause and effect for your actions… And people wonder why there’s “personal-responsibility” within the wingnuts!
June 7th, 2007 at 9:07 pmMr. Pressy,
it appears you are getting a bit irritated perhaps, things getting a bit old for you?
Comment by ForTruth — June 7, 2007 @ 9:05 pm
How do you mean, FT?
I thought we were cool again?
June 7th, 2007 at 9:07 pmJust don’t disrespect me, that’s all I ask.
We cool?
Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 9:04 pm
Yet you show no respect for others - you f*cking self absorbed little gluttonous fat*ss. You’re a lunatic loser.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:08 pmHell yeah TP can stretch a cats ass over a washbarrel.
That doesn’t mean I am giving in, its just politics.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:09 pmEven the Governor here, Tim Kaine (D-VA) castigated people just like you who made the tragedy a political issue a mere hour after the news broke. You should have the upper hand on no debate. Gun control doesn’t help, by the way. VT already had “gun control†- it was a gun-free zone. STFU. Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 9:02 pm
Virginia had gun control? Then how exactly did a guy that had been reported for stalking - buy one? Yeah, I can’t imagine how “gun-control” might have prevented this. Gun control actually *controls* gun - and that’s NOT what Virginia had. You’re a real idiot.
Oh, and I didn’t know that bashing the passing of someone’s GF didn’t exhibit indiciation of severe psychopathy. Then again, the crazy can’t be reliable for diagnosing themselves. Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 9:02 pm
Who’s bashing the passing her - I’m bashing his own st*pid attitudes around that passing. While decrying Cindy for not getting off casey’s casket, here’s Mizz President doing the same. Yeah, there’s *nothing* pathological about THAT! So while you *bash* others for self diagnosing - you do it? Wow, how *enjoyable* it is to see once again how a psychopath *projects* his pathology on others.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:12 pm“Mr. Pressy,
it appears you are getting a bit irritated perhaps, things getting a bit old for you?”
Mr. pResident, if you are irritated, may I suggest you consult with the good Doctor on the next thread, he may have something for you that’s right up your “alley”
June 7th, 2007 at 9:13 pmI like TP cuz they let a lot of comments stay. I don’t see that at most other places.
They have thier funding sources too. We all do.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:15 pmComment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus
Well, then he talked a little bit about everything, didn’t he. You couldn’t dare identify any political affiliation. VT has been discussed, by the way, so go stand back in the corner. You can’t take every national tragedy and play it into a liberal debate to be won.
Again, go check in.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:15 pmMr. pResident, if you are irritated, may I suggest you consult with the good Doctor on the next thread, he may have something for you that’s right up your “alleyâ€
Comment by heyzeus
Oh that’s hilarious. Good one.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:16 pm“Mr. Pressy,
it appears you are getting a bit irritated perhaps, things getting a bit old for you?â€
Mr. pResident, if you are irritated, may I suggest you consult with the good Doctor on the next thread, he may have something for you that’s right up your “alleyâ€
Comment by heyzeus — June 7, 2007 @ 9:13 pm
What do you want?
You’re just not that funny. I mean, I don’t want to hurt your feelings and shit but the “there, fixed it” thing is really, really old, and now you’re just sounding lame. Sorry.
Okay, I’ll give you a little Heyooo just for your effort:
HEYOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
June 7th, 2007 at 9:18 pmHey, ValientMoron
VT- VIRGINIA TECH - was a gun-free campus, even off-limits to those who could legally carry one. The only people who could be armed on that campus were the police.
You can disarm everybody you want, but it only takes one criminal with a gun to ruin that “peace.”
Liberal gun control puts guns in the hands of criminals - maybe an unintended effect, but still.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:19 pmWell, then he talked a little bit about everything, didn’t he. You couldn’t dare identify any political affiliation. Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 9:15 pm
Who cares about his “affiliation”, I was speaking to his “values”. Lots of you *wingnuts* claim to be independents and even Democrats (Zell Miller anyone?). It doesn’t change that you’re a lunatic wingnut.
VT has been discussed, by the way, so go stand back in the corner. You can’t take every national tragedy and play it into a liberal debate to be won. Again, go check in. Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 9:15 pm
BAHAHAHA, if you want to use a “parental” voice, you shouldn’t act like such a spoiled little brat - sh*thead! I know you haven’t yet been out in the “real-world”, but in it. People like you are disdained as arrogant pricks. Unless your daddy is going to pay your way, you’re in for a rough ride you pedantic little ignorant sh!thead.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:20 pmVT- VIRGINIA TECH - was a gun-free campus, even off-limits to those who could legally carry one. The only people who could be armed on that campus were the police.
You can disarm everybody you want, but it only takes one criminal with a gun to ruin that “peace.â€
Liberal gun control puts guns in the hands of criminals - maybe an unintended effect, but still. Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 9:19 pm
Wow, a *gun-free* campus, where he can just walk down the streets and buy one! Yeah, we should have all of the students carry their guns. So the next time they get in a fight, they can go *gansta* on each other - like in the hood.
Actually what puts guns in the hands of criminals, are f*ckers like you that always work to find loopholes to allow guns to easily be purchased. *ssh*le.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:21 pmComment #96
All but attempts to backtrack. You’re still mentally ill.
“Gun control,” as liberals coin it, is just a slogan, not a guarantee of “control” of safety. It’s a misleading term.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:22 pmComment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus
No, only Liberals have their way paid. Project much (x435)?
June 7th, 2007 at 9:24 pmYou can’t take every national tragedy and play it into a liberal debate to be won. Again, go check in. Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 7, 2007 @ 9:15 pm
All I have to say is PROJECT MUCH! You f*ckers won’t get off of any and every coffin you can find to turn into a debate. Schiavo, 911, you name it. You’re a bunch of immoral f*ckers. No wonder you PROJECT this onto others. *ssh*le b!tch!
June 7th, 2007 at 9:24 pmCatch ya later CT!
Hey VVGoFukYourself:
Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much? Project Much?
June 7th, 2007 at 9:26 pmCatch ya later CT!
Hey VVGoFukYourself:
Project Much? Comment by Mr. President — June 7, 2007 @ 9:26 pm
yeah, it’s very adult, and nothing *lunatic* about scrawling that on the wall so many times. Pure projection - loser.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:27 pmMr. President, adios. Take it easy.
Make short work of Mr. ValiantAnus, please.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:27 pmNo, only Liberals have their way paid.
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1
What could that possibly mean?
June 7th, 2007 at 9:28 pmComment by the republic of stupidity
You’re the liberal, you should know.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:31 pmWow, a f*cktard found the ability to cut and paste the same phrase hundreds of times in a single post.
What are you, a f*cking retarded 10 year old?
June 7th, 2007 at 9:33 pmComment by the republic of stupidity
You’re the liberal, you should know.
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1
Neither clever or meaningful. Can’t explain your own words?
BTW, how do you know I’m a “Liberal”? You’ve never met me. For someoen who’s so big on facts, where are yours in this case?
June 7th, 2007 at 9:40 pmDo any of you know how difficult cloning is?
It’s not like “Dolly” the sheep - which was pretty damned difficult and she had to be put down, BTW.
We are only at the start of understanding our own genetic make-up.
There is no way anyone will be even close to the science of Human Cloning anytime soon.
This was merely a Republican play to stop the bill that would put everyone’s minds at ease and allow them to entertain stem cell research for medicinal purposes.
It gives them a talking point.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:46 pmWell Mary Cheney’s baby could be a clone of her father Darth Dicky.
June 7th, 2007 at 9:47 pm39 post on this thread by trolls
June 7th, 2007 at 10:59 pmHow else will they reproduce? The heterosexual half of the GOP can’t get laid, and the other half… well, you get the picture…
June 7th, 2007 at 11:51 pmMr. pResident, if you are irritated, may I suggest you consult with the good Doctor on the next thread, he may have something for you that’s right up your “alleyâ€
Comment by heyzeus
Heyzeus, I assume when you say “up your alley” to MP you mean UP HIS ALLEY.
June 8th, 2007 at 12:07 amWell, then he talked a little bit about everything, didn’t he. You couldn’t dare identify any political affiliation. VT has been discussed, by the way, so go stand back in the corner. You can’t take every national tragedy and play it into a liberal debate to be won.
Again, go check in.
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1
Wow, I wasn’t aware you were running the show here at TP. Because most of us will be gone if you’re giving orders around here. THIS IS A PROGRESSIVE SITE. Look around, maybe you’ll figure it out.
June 8th, 2007 at 12:10 amWhat do you want?
You’re just not that funny. I mean, I don’t want to hurt your feelings and shit but the “there, fixed it†thing is really, really old, and now you’re just sounding lame. Sorry.
Okay, I’ll give you a little Heyooo just for your effort:
HEYOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment by Mr. President
You and your girlfriend CT aren’t really funny either. All you two do is waste everybody’s time. Why don’t you two find a way to communicate privately so we don’t have to watch the mutual masturbation going on between you two.
June 8th, 2007 at 12:13 am39 post on this thread by trolls
Comment by Wilco
And those two a$$holes get bitchy with us. I’ve seen those MP and CT destroy entire threads that would have been interesting if they hadn’t been around.
June 8th, 2007 at 12:19 amComment by JTitor — June 7, 2007 @ 9:06 pm
Yeah, JTitor, that was me.
CT isn’t rachel b. The rachel troll was crazy, but she was much smarter than CT.
June 8th, 2007 at 1:07 amWhether you like or hate “conservativeâ€, there’s really almost none left in D.C.
Comment by stopthecons — June 7, 2007 @ 8:16 pm
Dang! They must be some kind of superheroes then, to wield so much power.;)
——–
Yeah, there’s no cause and effect for your actions… And people wonder why there’s “personal-responsibility†within the wingnuts!
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — June 7, 2007 @ 9:07 pm
That’s amazing! A liberal using the phrase “personal responsibility”! Will wonders never cease?
June 8th, 2007 at 1:29 amWe are still primatives…..go figure.
IGNORE THE TROLLS - Debate is good - Trolling is bad
June 8th, 2007 at 1:37 amThat’s amazing! A liberal using the phrase “personal responsibilityâ€! Will wonders never cease?
Comment by upright left
Wow, a caustic, vituperative troll… haven’t seen one of them today…
June 8th, 2007 at 1:42 amI hope every single one of you righty trolls has a nasty disease in the family. That is the only way you toads finally get it. Think Nancy Reagan, a$$holes.
June 8th, 2007 at 1:46 amI never considered rachel to be a troll.
June 8th, 2007 at 1:53 amWow, a caustic, vituperative troll… haven’t seen one of them today…
Comment by the republic of stupidity — June 8, 2007 @ 1:42 am
Be careful in that glass house, stupid. ;)
June 8th, 2007 at 1:57 amI hope every single one of you righty trolls has a nasty disease in the family. That is the only way you toads finally get it. Think Nancy Reagan, a$$holes.
Comment by JPark — June 8, 2007 @ 1:46 am
Conservatives get sick as well, Park. We just don’t think that makes it ok to kill babies.
June 8th, 2007 at 2:00 amupright left, so, if you come down with leukemia you are ok with going off into the woods and dying, right?
June 8th, 2007 at 2:02 amOr, should I say, your 2 year old is diagnosed with leukemia…you are ok with tossing him to the wolves. Really, that is the only thing I can think of. You righties aren’t actually for life.
June 8th, 2007 at 2:03 amFor the record, even if it would cure leukemia, I would not kill an innocent human baby.
June 8th, 2007 at 2:04 amupright left, so, if you come down with leukemia you are ok with going off into the woods and dying, right?
Comment by JPark — June 8, 2007 @ 2:02 am
I’d prefer to die in the comfort of my home than in the woods, thank you. But I certainly don’t want any babies killed on my account.
June 8th, 2007 at 2:06 amYou guys don’t have kids.
June 8th, 2007 at 2:08 amIf you did you would do ANYTHING to protect your children. Let me know when you grow up.
June 8th, 2007 at 2:08 amOr, should I say, your 2 year old is diagnosed with leukemia…you are ok with tossing him to the wolves. Really, that is the only thing I can think of. You righties aren’t actually for life.
Comment by JPark — June 8, 2007 @ 2:03 am
Kill another baby to save my baby? No thank you. Besides, I know where the baby who dies will end up, so death isn’t something to be feared. I would suffer for the loss, of course. But wouldn’t that be the height of selfisness to choose any other option.
June 8th, 2007 at 2:10 amYou guys don’t have kids.
Comment by JPark — June 8, 2007 @ 2:08 am
Well dang! Whose kids are these in my house? If they aren’t mine, somebody needs to come get em pretty darn quick. woo hoo! I get to spend those college funds!
June 8th, 2007 at 2:12 amupright left, using medical waste to save your baby? Yeah, I think that is quite all right. Gee, something that is actually human life versus something that is 12 cells. Der.
June 8th, 2007 at 2:13 amupright left, I guarantee you they aren’t yours. If you aren’t willing to sacrifice blastocysts you don’t deserve to have kids.
June 8th, 2007 at 2:16 amDer.
Comment by JPark — June 8, 2007 @ 2:13 am
Let me know when you grow up.
Comment by JPark — June 8, 2007 @ 2:08 am
Heh heh. ;)
June 8th, 2007 at 2:16 amupright left, you can laugh if you want. You are still wrong and apparantly you know it since you don’t have a response.
June 8th, 2007 at 2:20 amIf you aren’t willing to sacrifice blastocysts you don’t deserve to have kids.
Comment by JPark — June 8, 2007 @ 2:16 am
If someone causes harm to the blastocyst that is becoming the child that you desperately want, have they commited a crime?
June 8th, 2007 at 2:24 amWhy do you say a child you desperately want? Why does that make a blastocyst any more important? A blastocyst is a group of 10-20 cells that is not viable, it is not a human, it has no “soul”. It has no brain, no heart, no lungs. The only possible reason you could consider it full human life is that you are a crispy. Are you?
June 8th, 2007 at 2:27 amWhy do you say a child you desperately want?
Comment by JPark — June 8, 2007 @ 2:27 am
Because if you don’t desperately want it, you’d say it’s ok to kill it almost until delivery. It’s the only way to get you to think about the subject from a point of view other than “We have the right to kill any baby before it is born.” I notice you chose not to answer the question. By your reasoning, that must mean that you know you are wrong. And your avoidance of the question was deliberate, unlike mine, since you did respond.
June 8th, 2007 at 2:36 amupright left, you say what if you desperately want a child. If your wife/girlfriend got “pregnant” and lost it at the blastocyst stage (extremely common) you wouldn’t even know it.
June 8th, 2007 at 2:40 amSorry, you are a righty, I shouldn’t have said girlfriend, I should have said future ex-wife.
June 8th, 2007 at 2:44 amupright left, you say what if you desperately want a child. If your wife/girlfriend got “pregnant†and lost it at the blastocyst stage (extremely common) you wouldn’t even know it.
Comment by JPark — June 8, 2007 @ 2:40 am
You know with in vitro. If someone caused harm to it, have they committed a crime?
June 8th, 2007 at 2:47 amSorry, you are a righty, I shouldn’t have said girlfriend, I should have said future ex-wife.
Comment by JPark — June 8, 2007 @ 2:44 am
If you plan in advance to have an ex-wife, you’ll most likely have one, buddy.
June 8th, 2007 at 2:51 amYou make now sense, upright. If someone caused the miscarriage that you never knew about?
June 8th, 2007 at 2:52 amOh, I get it upright. Oops, somebody bumped into her. Yeah, I would guess you would want the death penalty.
June 8th, 2007 at 2:53 amYou know with in vitro. If someone caused harm to it, have they committed a crime?
Comment by upright left — June 8, 2007 @ 2:47 am
C’mon my liberal friend, are you avoiding the question cause ya know you are wrong?
“You are still wrong and apparantly you know it since you don’t have a response.”
June 8th, 2007 at 2:58 amComment by JPark — June 8, 2007 @ 2:20 am
upright, why would I think they committed a crime?
June 8th, 2007 at 3:00 amMy apologies, I thought it would be obvious that I wouldn’t think invitro fertilization wouldn’t be a felony. I don’t know why you would ask that question though.
June 8th, 2007 at 3:03 amupright, why would I think they committed a crime?
Comment by JPark — June 8, 2007 @ 3:00 am
I can’t imagine why, J. ;) It’s only the beginning of a child that you previously seemed to care so much about. Just checking to make sure you are consistent. Somehow though, I think your reaction would be a little different if you actually found yourself in that situation. I expect that you would be upset that the person causing the harm had damaged your property rather than killing your child. Oh but there’s no need to get upset about someone damaging your property, right? In fact, I’m sure you would try to understand what awful thing in his life caused him to want to damage your property, right? ;)
June 8th, 2007 at 3:12 amMy apologies, I thought it would be obvious that I wouldn’t think invitro fertilization wouldn’t be a felony. I don’t know why you would ask that question though.
Comment by JPark — June 8, 2007 @ 3:03 am
These odd responses from liberals are really beginning to make me think you are deliberately being difficult. Forgive me if I’m mistaken, though. ;)
June 8th, 2007 at 3:19 amNo, upright, a blastocyst is not a child. It would not be noticed by the “parents to be”.
You are right that if I knew my gf/wife was pregnant and someone killed it I would be pissed. You don’t get it though. We are talking about medical waste. We are talking about tiny little clumps of cells that will NEVER be human beings. You somehow seem to think you have busted me on some sort of hypocrisy. You haven’t. There are THOUSANDS of non-viable blastocysts that instead of being thrown away could be used to save lives.
June 8th, 2007 at 3:22 amupright, no. My responses are not fake nor are they difficult. I don’t know if it should be an added charge if a pregnant woman is killed. I think it probably should but you guys would use it as an excuse to call any pregnancy (no matter how unviable) a double murder.
June 8th, 2007 at 3:26 amYou don’t get it though.
Comment by JPark — June 8, 2007 @ 3:22 am
You don’t get it, Park, or you choose not to answer. If you and your “significant other” need in vitro, get to the blastocyst stage, and some evil person destroys it, has he committed a crime? You were once a blastocyst, ya know, and look at you now! Good thing your folks didn’t consider you medical waste, eh buddy? ;)
June 8th, 2007 at 3:33 am#164 Sure, it is a crime, upright. It is destruction of property…which is exactly the crime he would be charged under the law.
June 8th, 2007 at 3:37 amYou know what, upright? I was an IUD baby. I was a mistake. They could have aborted me and you know what? I wouldn’t know the difference. I wasn’t wanted. However, my parents came around. If I had different parents, say abusive or neglectful parents I might as well have been aborted. I would likely be a criminal. And my mom, after my dad died went to college to make a good life for us, in turn instilling a work ethic in my brother and I. But YOU would have been against that WASTE of tax money. F^ck off upright.
June 8th, 2007 at 3:42 am#164 Sure, it is a crime, upright. It is destruction of property…which is exactly the crime he would be charged under the law.
Comment by JPark — June 8, 2007 @ 3:37 am
Which is exactly what I said earlier. Just wanted to know where ya stood. How many little properties do you have, Park? ;)
June 8th, 2007 at 3:42 amI guess I missed the important point. My mom went to college with the survivor’s benefits that were left after Reagan stole most of it.
June 8th, 2007 at 3:45 am