“In his June 6 column, Politico chief political columnist Roger Simon declared former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney the winner of the June 5 Republican presidential debate,” in part because he is “[s]trong, clear, gives good soundbite, and has shoulders you could land a 737 on.” Simon has previously described Romney as having “chiseled-out-of-granite features, a full, dark head of hair going a distinguished gray at the temples, and a barrel chest.”
Why are all of the NeoCons closeted gays or is Roger Simon openly gay?
June 8th, 2007 at 8:47 pmLOL
That’s all I have to say about that….
June 8th, 2007 at 8:48 pm“Gives good soundbite??” LMAO!
June 8th, 2007 at 8:50 pmOh brother this Simon guy has a gayish attraction to Romney.
June 8th, 2007 at 8:50 pmPick one…
1. “But Clinton did it too!”
2. “We’re fighting them there, so we don’t have to fight them here.”
3. “He serves at the President’s pleasure.”
4. “Libtards are cowards.”
5. All of the above.
June 8th, 2007 at 8:50 pmIs simon reporting from inside a comfortable closet?
June 8th, 2007 at 8:50 pmQuick! Tackle him and make sure he doesn’t stuff those shoulders!
June 8th, 2007 at 8:51 pmSo is this how the GOPers vote for a President, by deciding who is the one they most want to go to bed with in secret?
June 8th, 2007 at 8:54 pmGives good soundbite? Wha….?
I think Simon is just saying the Mittster is a man’s man. That’s all.
June 8th, 2007 at 8:54 pm“because he is “[s]trong, clear, gives good soundbite, and has shoulders you could land a 737 on.â€
because he is long, queer, gives good ****bite, and has shoulders you could hang on all night long
(fixed expressly for the troll known as Mr. pResident)
June 8th, 2007 at 8:54 pmWhat is this — are all Republicans secretly gay — What in the hell difference does it make to a voter or anyone else for that matter, how Romeney looks? Certainly it shouldn’t make any difference to Simon, unless it is because he can’t squelch his own latent feelings.
This is getting ridiculous.
Sorry Spudge Boy —after I typed my reply and I scrolled up to see you had the same thought.
But my sentiments are the same — are all these guys closeted gays? Is that why they are all so obsessed with sex — because they are repressed? For cryin’ out loud — come out!! Come out!! Simon — where are you!
June 8th, 2007 at 8:54 pmoh thhhtooop!
June 8th, 2007 at 8:54 pmBut was he a Cheerleader in college?
Otherwise, no deal.
June 8th, 2007 at 8:55 pmI suppose next Simon will want Romney to take his shirt off for him > lol.
June 8th, 2007 at 8:55 pmSimon drools to see Romney’s naked shoulders and his bare barrel hairy chest and see Mitt’s naked butt too > lol.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:01 pmSounds like it’s “true love” for Simon, eh?
June 8th, 2007 at 9:01 pmAnd, all of this lascivious description means what?? How does any of this factor into qualifications, BTW?
June 8th, 2007 at 9:02 pmWhat about Mitt’s hands, Mr Simon? Tell us about his hands….
Good god, this is disgusting….
June 8th, 2007 at 9:02 pmwonderful… we are going to elect a president based on how good he looks. in europe, voters dont care if your divorced, had an affair, single, gay, etc etc. america is lagging in this department
June 8th, 2007 at 9:03 pm… I like to watch….
June 8th, 2007 at 9:05 pmLower and lower and lower…
June 8th, 2007 at 9:06 pmI don’t know what is wrong with the GOP running men! They should run trial lawyers, empty suits and enablers like the Democrats.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:09 pmWhy are all of the NeoCons closeted gays or is Roger Simon openly gay?
Comment by Spudge_Boy
You’re right, that sounds soooo gay
June 8th, 2007 at 9:10 pmLike he is love-stuck, LMAO
GOP closet-cases and their man-crushes are always, if nothing else (like say pathological)… amusing.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:12 pmWhat’s next?
“And legs you could mount a cannon on.”?
June 8th, 2007 at 9:13 pmI don’t know what is wrong with the GOP running men! They should run trial lawyers, empty suits and enablers like the Democrats.
Comment by Unvarnished Truth
Do you mean, as opposed to the usual con men, sociopaths, and pedophiles the Repubs run?
June 8th, 2007 at 9:14 pmFrom the last GOP debate:
June 8th, 2007 at 9:15 pm8:31 PM: Romney’s decided to stand. He’s not going to apologize about becoming pro-standing. He’s been standing, in his heart, for a long time. Really, he’s a lifelong stander. Small varmint standing, mostly.
Will Simon get revolted when Romney takes off his suit and stands there in the silly one piece Mormon underwear? It has that back flap for going to the bathroom and a knee pocket.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:16 pmAnd all those things have to do with being a good politician because…
June 8th, 2007 at 9:17 pmWayne > be careful because Simon might say Romney has a cannon located you know where > lol.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:18 pmweird
June 8th, 2007 at 9:18 pmHey Roger, how about some juicy descriptions of McCain and the rest of the Repulsivescum lineup?
June 8th, 2007 at 9:19 pm(Ooooh, Ghouliani…………)
Juan > it all makes sense now. The far-right GOPers voted for Bush, not to have a beer with him, but to go to bed with him.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:20 pmWell, that will all be dealt with once Hillary announces Kevin Sorbo as her running mate!
June 8th, 2007 at 9:21 pmWhat’s next?
“And legs you could mount a cannon on.�
Comment by Wayne A. Schneider
You could email him and suggest it. :D
June 8th, 2007 at 9:21 pm“and a knee pocket.”
never heard of the knee pocket before, what do they keep in that?
June 8th, 2007 at 9:21 pmthe toilet paper?
(though, on second thought, Lucy Lawless would be a better idea!)
June 8th, 2007 at 9:22 pmAnd all those things have to do with being a good politician because…
… Roger Simon says so. There. Take that. Plus, and it’s a good one, Romney’s got a cool first name. “Mitt”… I’ve never heard of that as a first name before. Even more of a reason to think he’d make a good president.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:22 pmHonestly, an unattractive candidate has a difficult time getting the attention and approval of the electorate. Kucinich may have some of the most innovative and just policies in his approach, but he can’t get any traction, in good part because of his appearance, from what I read and hear from associates.
Mitt is a very handsome, rich, articulate man. He is also a political opportunist (most politicians have to be), a flip-flopper, and may actually be running for warden of Gitmo 2.
If a female columnist was so enraptured with Mitt’s looks and continued to comment on it, she would be deemed unprofessional. Simon is the same. I am guessing he would have said Mitt won the debate even if Mitt hadn’t opened his mouth (to give that ever-lovin’ “good sound bite”)!
June 8th, 2007 at 9:23 pmheyzeus > Simon wants Romney. He must get turned off by chipmonk cheek McCain and does not want a sissy cross-dresser like Giuliani.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:23 pmLiberals just don’t understand that the width of your shoulders can determine how effective your policies will be…
June 8th, 2007 at 9:24 pmheyzeus > I forgot to ask my Mormon friend if they put anything in the pockets on the undergarment.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:26 pmRomney said the size of Guantonimo should be DOUBLED, in spite of overwhelming negative world reaction to it…but hey, He LOOKS presidential.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:26 pmLiberals just don’t understand that the width of your shoulders can determine how effective your policies will be…
Comment by AkaDad — June 8, 2007 @ 9:24 pm
What an interesting concept, please give us some examples of how a certain body type results in the efficacy of policies.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:28 pmWell God knows what Simon would say if he ever saw Romney naked. But then if Romney was naked in from of Simon, Romney wouldn’t be much of a Republican candidate anymore.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:28 pmAkaDad > next you will tell us the size of the crotch bulge is important too?
June 8th, 2007 at 9:29 pmI think Politico has some kind of secret deal with the Log Cabin.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:30 pm“Barrel chest is not a disease. But it may indicate an underlying condition.”
See, “Barrel chest: What causes it?”
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/barrel-chest/AN00359
June 8th, 2007 at 9:31 pmVincennes > only if they were caught naked together in bed. GOP FL Governor Charlie Crist is a closeted Gay guy, but nobody has stepped forward with the pics yet. If it happens then Charlie is gone as Gov.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:33 pmmaybe they simply put padding in the knee pockets………..
June 8th, 2007 at 9:33 pmold hack > maybe Simon is suggesting to Log Cabin Republicans to vote for Romney because he is a closeted GOPer too?
June 8th, 2007 at 9:35 pmIt sounds like Simon is impressed with Mitt’s bulge…
June 8th, 2007 at 9:36 pmLiberals just don’t understand that the width of your shoulders can determine how effective your policies will be…
Comment by AkaDad — June 8, 2007 @ 9:24 pm
What an interesting concept, please give us some examples of how a certain body type results in the efficacy of policies.
Comment by Namtillaku — June 8, 2007 @ 9:28 pm
Does “acerebral” count as a “body type”?
June 8th, 2007 at 9:37 pmheyzeus > lol padding in the knees might come in handy for some Mormons.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:37 pmDoes “acerebral†count as a “body type�
Comment by Wayne A. Schneider — June 8, 2007 @ 9:37 pm
LOL – in this case yes, yes it does.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:39 pmComment by Namtillaku — June 8, 2007 @ 9:39 pm
I rest my case. :)
June 8th, 2007 at 9:43 pmWhat an interesting concept, please give us some examples of how a certain body type results in the efficacy of policies.
Comment by Namtillaku
How about the Empty Suit?
June 8th, 2007 at 9:44 pmWould be funny if it was found out that Romney pads the shoulders of his suits. Poor Simon might commit suicide to find that out. Plus Mitt might wear a girdle to hold his stomach in too.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:51 pmHow about the Empty Suit?
Comment by Zooey
Or “The Mouthpiece”?
June 8th, 2007 at 9:51 pmOr “The Mouthpiece�
Comment by the republic of stupidity
Good on so many levels…. :D
June 8th, 2007 at 9:54 pmand those dreamy eyes… mmm… oops! did I type what I was thinking again?
June 8th, 2007 at 9:55 pmTin ear?
June 8th, 2007 at 9:56 pmThis is fun, how about ‘the bended knee’?
June 8th, 2007 at 9:57 pmYou know, the attacks are going to write themselves:
June 8th, 2007 at 9:57 pmIf it’s Giuliani, his drag pictures.
If it’s McCain, his Sunday Stroll in Baghdad.
If it’s Fred Thompson, a good shot of his wife. (Behold your First Lady!)
And if it’s Mitt, just run clips of Battlefield Earth.
There is little doubt in my mind that Roger Simons is gay.
June 8th, 2007 at 10:00 pmThis is fun, how about ‘the bended knee’?
Comment by Namtillaku
The Windbag?
June 8th, 2007 at 10:01 pmTin ear?
Comment by AkaDad — June 8, 2007 @ 9:56 pm
Maybe I should clarify, I was specifically referring to your comment, “Liberals just don’t understand that the width of your shoulders can determine how effective your policies will be…”
I wasn’t interested in hearing about a tin ear, I was interested in how the width of someones shoulders affected their policy.
June 8th, 2007 at 10:02 pmHow about the proverbial hand on the May Pole?
June 8th, 2007 at 10:03 pmHmmm…shoe size? “You know what they say: big feet, big shoes!”
Simon has a man-crush. (Simon says “Woof!”) He should get together with Chris Matthews, I’m sure they’d have lots to talk about.
June 8th, 2007 at 10:03 pmMaybe I should clarify, I was specifically referring to your comment, “Liberals just don’t understand that the width of your shoulders can determine how effective your policies will be…â€
I wasn’t interested in hearing about a tin ear, I was interested in how the width of someones shoulders affected their policy.
Comment by Namtillaku
I could be wrong, Namtillaku, but I thought AkaDad was simply being sarcastic. That true, AkaDad?
June 8th, 2007 at 10:06 pmHow about the proverbial hand on the May Pole?
Comment by Zooey
Careful, dear. A comment like that might bring the trolls on a dead run, like shouting Suuueeeey! Suuueeeey! They’ll be pushing and shoving like crazy for a place in that line.
June 8th, 2007 at 10:08 pmI could be wrong, Namtillaku, but I thought AkaDad was simply being sarcastic. That true, AkaDad?
Comment by the republic of stupidity — June 8, 2007 @ 10:06 pm
Now that you mention it…
June 8th, 2007 at 10:09 pmThey’ll be pushing and shoving like crazy for a place in that line.
Comment by the republic of stupidity — June 8, 2007 @ 10:08 pm
Oops. Didn’t mean to summon them…. :{
June 8th, 2007 at 10:15 pmThis is reminiscent of when those pundits who allegedly ask the hardball questions, people such as Chris Matthews and Peggy Noonan and G. Gordon Liddy, could scarcely control themselves after Bush rode in on that aircraft carrier to declare Mission Accomplished and kept declaring how manly Bush looked in his flight suit and especially his bulging codpiece. If only they had paid as much attention to Bush’s less than than stellar service in the National Guard, when he kept the skies of Texas safe against Oklahoma and/or when he managed to mysteriously disappear in Alabama where he was supposed to report for duty in the Alabama National Guard. A reward for at least $10,000 has been offered for anyone who was in tha Alabama National Guard who can verify that he remembers seeing Bush being in that unit in Alabama. No one has ever come forward to say that they served in the Guard with a future president of the United States.
June 8th, 2007 at 10:15 pmOops. Didn’t mean to summon them…. :{
Comment by Zooey
They’re not here yet. Besides, what are they going to do w/ this one? Roger Simon has GOT to be wishing he hadn’t written that article by now.
June 8th, 2007 at 10:23 pm100% true
June 8th, 2007 at 10:25 pmOr he’s busy writing the next one……. do you think he’s going for the position of Press Secretary?
June 8th, 2007 at 10:28 pm(imagine a WH press briefing ………
Daryll will NOT come on this thread, because it’s about a GOPer being Gay, so he will stay away > PERIOD.
June 8th, 2007 at 10:28 pmNo one has ever come forward to say that they served in the Guard with a future president of the United States.
Comment by Erroll — June 8, 2007 @ 10:15 pm
That has always been a curious mtter to me — yet the press never pursued it even through all the stories about Bush’s AWOL history.
June 8th, 2007 at 10:31 pm100% true
Comment by AkaDad
A-Ha! I thought so… if there’s one thing I’m good at, it’s sarcasm.
June 8th, 2007 at 10:34 pmDan Rather blew it for an investigation of Bush’s phony Air National Guard service. They set up Rather to undermine any real investigation by the press into Bush’s past.
June 8th, 2007 at 10:35 pmhaven’t heard from ‘Daryll’ in quite some time, my own intuition suggests he has reincarnated himself hereabouts as “timmy”
June 8th, 2007 at 10:35 pmjust a hunch, nothing substantial yet to back up this postulation…
No one has ever come forward to say that they served in the Guard with a future president of the United States.
Comment by Erroll
A friend of mine’s father was Brush’s roomate in college, or so the story goes. The father won’t talk about it too much. Says The Men In Black came a-visiting back BEFORE the 2000 election to see what sort of funny stories Dad had to tell about the candidate…
June 8th, 2007 at 10:38 pmOr he’s busy writing the next one……. do you think he’s going for the position of Press Secretary?
(imagine a WH press briefing ………
Comment by heyzeus
Hmmm… anyone remember the comment KKKarl Rove made about the first time he ever met Brush? He said something to the effect that as Brush approached him in his cowboy boots, he (KKKarl) had never seen anyone w/ so much charisma before…
(I’ll be bck in a minute, folks… I have to go puke…)
June 8th, 2007 at 10:41 pmMr. President/m12 your Fedex order is ready for pickup.
Enter any combination of up to 30 FedEx tracking or Door Tag numbers:
———————————–
June 8th, 2007 at 10:43 pmView your shipment below:
http://img102.imageshack.us/img102/29/lube8oh.jpg
Simon is right, he is way hot.
June 8th, 2007 at 10:43 pm“The Men In Black came a-visiting back BEFORE the 2000 election..”
Alberto Gonzales was hard at work back in those days, sanitizing, threatening, coercing……..
June 8th, 2007 at 10:44 pmAlberto Gonzales was hard at work back in those days, sanitizing, threatening, coercing……..
Comment by heyzeus
It may not have been Alberto, or it may have been, but anyway you put it, someone was, yes.
June 8th, 2007 at 10:48 pm“KKKarl) had never seen anyone w/ so much charisma before…”
and georgie didn’t just swallow the bait:
June 8th, 2007 at 10:48 pmhe inhaled it…….
hook, line, sinker, rod, reel, boat, motor…………………
100% true
Comment by AkaDad — June 8, 2007 @ 10:25 pm
I’d apologize, but then I’d look even more like an idiot.
June 8th, 2007 at 10:51 pmI’d apologize, but then I’d look even more like an idiot.
Comment by Namtillaku — June 8, 2007 @ 10:51 pm
That’s okay. I was having fun with it.
June 8th, 2007 at 10:53 pmSorry, that last post from Jane was actually mine. I forgot to change the name in the boxes. Hopefully that won’t be a problem again in the near future.
June 8th, 2007 at 10:54 pmheyzeus > maybe Daryll ran into Jeff Gannon and he changed his mind about being Gay as bad thing?
June 8th, 2007 at 11:03 pmI guess Simon must have given up on a constitutional amendment for Arnie. So howzabout Sly? Much better shoulders than Mitt. Steroids for Rudi perhaps?
June 8th, 2007 at 11:05 pmMarie
What makes Bush’s time, or lack of, in the Guard so infuriating is that
1] Bush scored the absolute minimum on the pilot aptitude test, which was 25 per cent. Normally that would ensure that that person would not even be considered for pilot training. Instead Bush leaped over 400 to 500 other people who were eminently more qualified than he to be trained as a pilot.
2] He requested a transfer from Texas to Alabama, ostensibly so that he could help work on the campaign of a politician in Alabama. What no one seemed to have noticed was that Bush, the flyer of jets, had transferred to a unit that had no airplanes. He never showed up. He also flunked the flight physical the very same year that drug testing began for routine physicals for pilots.
The result was that, as in everything else in his life, he suffered absolutely no consequences for his actions.
June 8th, 2007 at 11:06 pmSimon, you write soooo fabulously, girl ! So many candidates, so little honesty….
June 8th, 2007 at 11:07 pmheyzeus > maybe Daryll ran into Jeff Gannon and he changed his mind about being Gay as bad thing?
Comment by Jay Randal
Oh, I doubt if Daryll had to be persuaded… that was all just a front for the public. Remember, the Official Policy right now is Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell…
June 8th, 2007 at 11:08 pmOh, and BTW, do you think Gannon was still looking for that wristwatch?
June 8th, 2007 at 11:09 pmSounds promising, but I’m suspending judgment until I hear about his wiener.
June 8th, 2007 at 11:09 pmSounds promising, but I’m suspending judgment until I hear about his wiener.
Comment by Dez
Huh? How did Oscar Meyer get into this discussion? What office is he running for? Oval, or oral?
June 8th, 2007 at 11:13 pmHopefully that won’t be a problem again in the near future.
Comment by Wayne A. Schneider
Try using firefox, separate tabs. If you’re both posting close together.
June 8th, 2007 at 11:27 pmI never really shut off my portable, just suspend if toting it a distance, so all my favorite blogs news and “da google” are always open on a different tab. heh
I’d apologize, but then I’d look even more like an idiot.
Comment by Namtillaku
Welcome to my life… :}
June 8th, 2007 at 11:31 pm“because he is “[s]trong, clear, gives good soundbite, and has shoulders you could land a 737 on.â€
because he is long, queer, gives good ****bite, and has shoulders you could hang on all night long
(fixed expressly for the troll known as Mr. pResident)
Comment by Blue Fairy — June 8, 2007 @ 8:54 pm
I have no problem with this, BF.
June 8th, 2007 at 11:43 pmIf you read this, could you tell me: what’s your point?
What’s the big deal?
Mitt is an attractive man, I’ll say, I’m comfortable with my sexuality.
What a man can’t say that another man is handsome?
What a double-standard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111
June 8th, 2007 at 11:46 pmMr. President is trying to make us say it’s bad to be gay – but of course it isn’t. He is desperate for attention. Trying to create controversy where there is none.
June 8th, 2007 at 11:51 pmWhat a man can’t say that another man is handsome?
Comment by Mr. President
He didnt say that. He said that “somebody could land a 737 in his shoulders”. It is like me saying, hey, that women is attractive, instead of “hey, I could land … ” you know…
June 8th, 2007 at 11:52 pmHe didnt say that. He said that “somebody could land a 737 in his shouldersâ€. It is like me saying, hey, that women is attractive, instead of “hey, I could land … †you know…
Comment by Juan C — June 8, 2007 @ 11:52 pm
Yeah I know… it’s pretty funny.
June 8th, 2007 at 11:54 pmMr. President is trying to make us say it’s bad to be gay – but of course it isn’t. He is desperate for attention. Trying to create controversy where there is none.
Comment by SKdeA
There you go. Ignore the pitiful troll.
June 9th, 2007 at 12:03 amMr. President is trying to make us say it’s bad to be gay – but of course it isn’t. He is desperate for attention. Trying to create controversy where there is none.
Comment by SKdeA
There you go. Ignore the pitiful troll.
Comment by gummitch — June 9, 2007 @ 12:03 am
There YOU BOTH go NOT ignoring shit…
June 9th, 2007 at 12:09 amhey all… just back from a wedding reception…
i know – don’t type drunk… but i’m not that far gone…
just wanted to get this thought out there…
do a check on “barrel chest” in the google, or medical site…
not a good sign… here’s one:
Typically a late sign of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), barrel chest results from augmented lung volumes due to chronic airflow obstruction. The patient may not notice it because it develops gradually.
http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/b/barrel_chest/book-diseases-8a.htm
first thing i thought of when reading this… it’s nothing to brag about…
June 9th, 2007 at 1:14 amthat’s all… say g’nite…
g’nite…
Er. ah, that review was well sorta gay…..not that there is anything wrong with that….to each their own….but for cons, that was well….a, “Do you like gladiators Timmy?” moment there.
IGNORE THE TROLLS – Debate good – Trolls bad
June 9th, 2007 at 1:56 amI nominate politico chief political columnist Roger Simon to be Romney’s personal campaign “fluffer”.
June 9th, 2007 at 2:36 amRom is hot. I call him Ram Rod.
June 9th, 2007 at 2:50 amThese kind of remarks, whether homoerotically charged or not, reflect the stupidity of our political culture. Is substance discussed after any of the so-called debates? No, everyone discusses the trivial, things like “performance” and how people “come off.” We are daily betrayed by these jerks who treat presidential candidates as if they’re Paris Hilton: with breezy contempt or gaga celebrity worship.
June 9th, 2007 at 9:12 amRomney wil get run over by the fundiers
June 9th, 2007 at 10:32 amthink of it, simon says mitt is a handsome fellow that he would like to land on. what more do you need to know about simon?
June 9th, 2007 at 10:50 amComment by Sven — June 9, 2007 @ 9:12 am
Yo Sven,
You want substance? Go to a thread that STARTS with substance. A comments section regarding Simon gushing over Romney’s dreaminess isn’t going to attract anything but snark.
June 9th, 2007 at 11:26 amWhen a candidate is praised solely for their physical attributes, you gotta wonder why nothing is said of their politics, ethics, experience, platform, you know, the things that count!
June 9th, 2007 at 11:58 amBut has he seen Romney in his special undies?
June 9th, 2007 at 12:21 pmWhat about the cock?
June 9th, 2007 at 12:23 pmI for one say “Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeew!”
June 9th, 2007 at 1:41 pmWho taking odds on which of Mitt’s body parts will be highlighted next? His eyes and their steely determination? His feet so wide and strong that he need not wear skis when towed behind a boat? The Presidential power packed by his potato-pickin’ ankles? Or is it Mitt’s manly Mormon ears?
HA!
AF
June 9th, 2007 at 1:49 pmStick a pipe in his mouth and he’s J. R. “Bob” Dobbs.
June 9th, 2007 at 4:37 pmI don’t think Mitt’s hot at all. He’s got that “Hi, I’m here to talk to you about the Book of Mormon” creepy-ass look.
My gay says he’s not hot either.
June 9th, 2007 at 5:21 pmSounds to me like Simon is angling to become one of Mitt’s many wives up in the celestial kingdom.
June 9th, 2007 at 5:52 pmJesus! These people, all of them, speaking with rapid, shallow breath how very “manly” this or that GOPer candidate is…I KNOW they are all sporting woodies as they go on. I want all these clowns to be put on TV sans jacket and tie, just t-shirt and slacks, standing in profile while they get all gushy over manly body parts of the various GOPer candidates. I want their pup tents to be caught on film for all the world to see so we can finally get documented confirmation that the entire GOP is really just a homoerotic party of in-the-closets. They NEED to be encouraged to come out. Their sexual frustration and suppression is leading us into entirely unnecessary wars.
Once they come out, voluntarily or by force, then they will be able to relax, accept their gay-ness, and we can have some peace and reason in government (and media) again.
June 9th, 2007 at 6:53 pmSimon wants some mormon salami up his drainpipe…
June 9th, 2007 at 7:38 pmThankfully, there’s no such thing as Mormon salami.
AF
June 9th, 2007 at 10:28 pmYet another man crush from a supporter of the homophobic party and its candidates. Next, Simon will be praising Romney’s chest (”Comely, dreamy, hairy chest… yummy!).
It’s hard to tell who wrote that piece: A middle aged journalist, or a teenage girl with a crush. Do conservatives have secret man crushes on their male leaders?
I bet they do.
June 10th, 2007 at 12:44 am