Comments on: Schlozman may revise sworn testimony.

By: Mr. Bush Goes To Hell

Mr. Bush Goes To Hell — Sat, 09 Jun 2007 08:07:54 +0000

Ja, poor Schlotzie….

He izz in SUCH trrrrouble!

By: RUCerious

RUCerious — Sat, 09 Jun 2007 02:18:49 +0000

How does that work? You give testimony, under oath.
Then come back and “revise” it?
Isn’t that also known as perjury?

By: Jay Randal

Jay Randal — Sat, 09 Jun 2007 01:03:57 +0000

Schlozman must be forced to resign > PERIOD.

By: heyzeus

heyzeus — Sat, 09 Jun 2007 01:02:37 +0000

His next televised appearance before the Judiciary Committee will be entitled:
“Lets Make A Deal…..”

By: Zooey

Zooey — Sat, 09 Jun 2007 00:27:08 +0000

Schlotzy needs to “revise” his lies?

Uh huh….

By: Candyce

Candyce — Sat, 09 Jun 2007 00:08:11 +0000

He made a very definitive statement about Donsanto giving him the go-ahead. Schumer stated, “He will explicity say he ordered you to do it or told you it was ok to do it.” Schlozman, “That is correct.”

When he made that statement, it was obvious to anyone watching it was a lie, and Schumer knew it was a lie. A subsequent look at an email exchange shows Donsanto, the author of the red book, would never have given such a directive or guidance, which was explicitly counter to his own guidelines. Schlozman got caught in a red hot lie, and now he needs to “clarify.” I’m sure Donsanto had a lot to say about that.

Now, what’s with this do-over crap?

By: Kate Henry

Kate Henry — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:57:53 +0000

Sorry guy. You don’t get “do overs” when you are testifying in front of Congress. What a bunch of stooges these guys are.

By: the republic of stupidity

the republic of stupidity — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:54:51 +0000

â€œthat he consulted with the section and was given guidance, not direction.â€

If he’s claiming guidance only, and not direction, he’s saying it was more his choice. Who’s he protecting, or who’s been threatening Bradley?

By: angryvietnamvet

angryvietnamvet — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:48:19 +0000

Concern about looking vindictive?

Yes, I want Democrats to be as vindictive as possible…is there a stronger word to express the desire to totally and completely, without any qualms and with completely justification throttle these guys to within on inch of their lives…vindictive is too nice a term for these vermin…

By: RoboTroll 3100

RoboTroll 3100 — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:40:57 +0000

RoboTroll 3100 Reports:

This is great news for the Republicans!

This will lead to the President’s poll numbers rebounding.

People see President Bush as Someone They Want to Have a (Non-Alcoholic) Beer Withâ„¢. Bradly Schlozman is the same way, only Jewish.

By: Tracy

Tracy — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:40:12 +0000

Excuse me. He can take the “test” again after failing! No way. What kind of justice is this!?

By: Buck Fush

Buck Fush — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:39:56 +0000

You just have to assume at some point here, that everything that anybody in this administration (if you can call it that) is a outright lie or misdirection of some sort.
They have told so many lies, that it is probably getting pretty hard for the oversite committee to keep track of them all.

IGNORE THE TROLLS – Debate good – Troll bad

By: ConcernTroll 3050

ConcernTroll 3050 — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:37:32 +0000

ConcernTroll 3050 Reports:

Democrats should not pursue this. He obviously misspoke and it will make Democrats look vindictive if they go after him too hard.

I’m just concerned about how the Democrats will look, that’s all.

By: Damian

Damian — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:36:05 +0000

Direction means someone else is to blame. Guidance? Not as much. And yes, that was a weaselly lie.

By: Armando Gomez

Armando Gomez — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:35:20 +0000

Neo-cons have become the grand masters of hair-spiting. You gotta love â€˜em for that. That â€œcominâ€™ â€ from the â€œgut,â€ alright.

By: SKdeA

SKdeA — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:35:06 +0000

And he’s admitting it. I’m sorry, is there such a thing as being able to wipe away perjury after the fact? Nail the bastard.

By: RoboTroll 3100

RoboTroll 3100 — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:34:53 +0000

RoboTroll 31000 reports:

Libs are criminalizing bad memories.

Pleasure of the Presidentâ„¢

Clinton Did It Tooâ„¢

By: Some Guy

Some Guy — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:33:30 +0000

or to put it more bluntly, he f*ckin’ lied.

By: Some Guy

Some Guy — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:32:06 +0000

that’s a generous word.

By: Spudge_Boy

Spudge_Boy — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:27:12 +0000

“I mistalked.”