C-SPAN Gets Savaged By Right-Wing Radio Listeners
C-SPAN Gets Savaged By Right-Wing Radio Listeners
Last week, right-wing radio host Michael Savage was presented a Freedom of Speech award at Talkers Magazine’s annual New Media Seminar. C-SPAN, which aired portions of the two-day event, chose to not air Savage’s acceptance speech because the conservative talker only appeared in a pre-recorded DVD speech.
Savage is now claiming he is a victim of censorship. Repeatedly attacking C-SPAN this week as “fascists” and modern versions of the “brownshirt movement in Hitler’s Germany,” Savage encouraged his listeners to call and email CSPAN about their supposed “blacklisting” of his speech.
On Washington Journal this morning, host and C-SPAN CEO Brian Lamb read aloud some of the emails he has received from alleged listeners of Savage’s show. The emails defending Savage are filled with personal attacks, referring to Lamb as an “ass loser Communist,” “pervert,” “bed-wetting commie,” and worse. Watch it:
Michael Savage is obviously not responsible for the content of these emails. But it’s worth noting that such attacks are standard fare for Savage’s radio show. According to Savage, MoveOn.org members are “rat-bastard Communists,” supporters of the Fairness Doctrine are “Nazis” and “no different than the Bolsheviks in 1917,” and Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) says things that “Goebbels would be proud of.”
As Lamb notes in his introduction to the emails, Savage is also using the faux controversy to make money by charging his fans $20 apiece to buy a copy of the supposedly censored speech.
(HT: Paddy)
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
*sigh* Oh well, I guess this is as exciting.
Good Morning America gets “Anthrax” letter with white powder in it.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:25 pmThis is just old news.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:27 pmSo is TP suggesting Savage receive the Chavez treatment?
June 15th, 2007 at 5:28 pmThis is where the country is headed folks, and it’s not going to get any better.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:29 pmOh, okay. Now I’m not sad!!! (the h/t didn’t show up at first)
June 15th, 2007 at 5:29 pmsavage is such a non-issue, just like glen beck. Not worthy of any real discussion.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:30 pmAm I the only one who thinks Frank J sounds a lot like Jake?
June 15th, 2007 at 5:31 pmI’m coming to detest this country. The fascists accusations of fascism and only a weak kneed Democratic party to speak for the people, we are lost.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:31 pmDid not the right wing listeners kill some talk show host in Denver? Is there not a law against this kind of hate speech by Savage?
June 15th, 2007 at 5:31 pmWonder if Savage knuckle draggers know that Michael has a homosexual past and hung out with the likes of Alan Ginsburg?
June 15th, 2007 at 5:32 pmComment by Frank J
I thought America was a progressive nation? I’m still looking for confirmation to that report…
June 15th, 2007 at 5:32 pmTypical “conservative” assh*les. I’d bet that all the letter writers claim to be Christian, too, and I’d win that bet.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:32 pmTP, Please , this is not news. This is not worthy of discussion.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:33 pmFascists? Brownshirts? Was Savage looking in a mirror when these words came to mind?
June 15th, 2007 at 5:34 pmI thought it was the left that was “uncivil”? That’s what the right keeps telling us, anyway…
June 15th, 2007 at 5:34 pmTell the Dem Pol to defend the Constitution or vote the bastards out at the next primary and select new Dems who will.
Never allow another GOP to hold office. Never allow a Dem not to stand and have the balls to do what is right!
June 15th, 2007 at 5:34 pmHey TP, why do you keep erasing the info fields.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:35 pmSavage is a cartoon character “.”
June 15th, 2007 at 5:36 pmTell the Dem Pol to defend the Constitution or vote the bastards out at the next primary and select new Dems who will.
Never allow another GOP to hold office. Never allow a Dem not to stand and have the balls to do what is right!
Comment by EasyRider
Again, another poor misguided soul that thinks that the Democrats are any different then the Republicans.
Hasn’t the “do nothing” Democratic Congress shown any of you guys that the 2 parties are in bed with each other?
WAKE UP ALREADY!
June 15th, 2007 at 5:38 pmAhhh… Gotta love those “compassionate, religious, moral conservatives.” Crazy bastards.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:43 pmDamn, this nut case sounds like the average TP blogger.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:44 pmThose posts are as zany as the ones posted here… LOL You dam right-left wing moon-bat trolls are bad…. Mmmmmmmmmmm
June 15th, 2007 at 5:45 pmMichael WHINER. How’s his POODLE doing?
June 15th, 2007 at 5:45 pmFascists? Brownshirts? Was Savage looking in a mirror when these words came to mind?
Comment by VerbalKint — June 15, 2007 @ 5:34 pm
Case in point.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:45 pmHey! Savage apparently “blacklisted” himself form the Talkers ceremony for him!
http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/ 2007/ 06/ michael-savage-freedom-of-speech-award.html
Again underscoring his ultra- reclusive nature, the “Savage Nation” host unexpectedly failed to appear at a ceremony where he was to pick up an industry honor.
Selected to receive this year’s Freedom Of Speech Award at the New Media Seminar held over the weekend in New York City, Savage instead substituted a hastily- made YouTube- style home video.
LOL!!!
June 15th, 2007 at 5:46 pmI thought America was a progressive nation? I’m still looking for confirmation to that report…
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 15, 2007 @ 5:32 pm
Americans support an active government that tackles problems, provides services, and aids those in need.
Americans support increasing the minimum wage and strong unions, and believe the wealthy and corporations don’t pay their fair share of taxes.
Americans support legal abortion and embryonic stem cell research; opinions on equal rights for women and gay Americans have grown dramatically more progressive in recent years.
Americans support a progressive approach to national security, emphasizing strong alliances and diplomacy over the indiscriminate use of military force. On domestic security issues, progressive approaches to crime and gun control enjoy wide support.
By enormous margins, Americans favor strong environmental protections, a core progressive belief.
Americans support energy conservation and the development of alternative fuels.
Health care - Americans clearly favor universal coverage and are more than comfortable with government solutions to the health care problem.
http://mediamatters.org/progmaj/
Of greater concern for Republicans generally, however, is the party’s weak state heading into the 2008 election. By 52% to 31%, Americans say they want Democrats to win the presidency next year.
http://online.wsj.com/ article_email/ SB118177312675434460-lMyQjAxMDE3ODExNDcxNzQzWj.html
June 15th, 2007 at 5:46 pmHasn’t the “do nothing†Democratic Congress shown any of you guys that the 2 parties are in bed with each other?
oh, jeez, not this lame ass, backwards(im really a closet republican acting like a democrat who’s ‘pissed off’ that the Dems are doing anything) rambling claptrap again. Do some f@cking research. Hell, watch cspan. please, STFU til you know what is coming out of your mouth.
don’t respond to me either. I prefer to have conversations with informed people.I explained all this in an earlier hread. I’m too tired to wake your monkey ass up to reality right now…
sigh…….
June 15th, 2007 at 5:46 pmComment by Mr. President
You should understand that there’s a one-sided approach with the 2nd Amendment - the libbie side.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:47 pm“Americans give the Republican Party their most negative assessment in the two-decade history of the Journal/NBC survey, and by 49% to 36% they say the Democratic Party more closely shares their values and positions on the issues.”
Look what happened - Howard Dean read George Lakoff who said that we need to start talking about our VALUES, which actually are the same values as the Progressive Majority, and look what happens!
Keep up the good work everyone, it’s working…
June 15th, 2007 at 5:47 pm#9,
Alan Berg was murdered by Neo-Nazis here in Denver back in 1984, shot 13 times. David Lane, the getaway driver in the murder, just died recently in prison.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:47 pmComment by unbelievable
You explain things rather well. Did you say you were a teacher?
June 15th, 2007 at 5:48 pmwhiteyfresh, YOU’RE the blind idiot.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:48 pmAttacking Brian Lamb as a liberal hack is kind of like attacking the Post Office for being left-wing.
One of the great things about C-SPAN is its scrupulous attention to even-handedness. As opposed to, say, Faux News.
Oh– I get it now… anything that doesn’t toe the right-wing line is leftist/communist/fascist, right?
Makes sense now. That whole “if it’s not black, it’s white” thing.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:49 pm“Nazi-Commies” again?, hehehehe….what do you want from a nutritionist
June 15th, 2007 at 5:49 pmYou should understand that there’s a one-sided approach with the 2nd Amendment - the libbie side.
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 15, 2007 @ 5:47 pm
No, I don’t think it necessarily has to do with Libs and Cons.
It’s all these little bitches screaming “NAZI,” “FASCIST,” and all that other nonsense that pisses me off.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:49 pmComment by Mr. President — June 15, 2007 @ 5:49 pm
We’ll, that’s certainly a better perspective.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:52 pmwhiteyfresh, YOU’RE the blind idiot.
Comment by JPV — June 15, 2007 @ 5:48 pm
wow JPV-real stinger there. Actually,my neighber is blind, and she can see what’s going on so much better than you. Oh, and I never called you a blind idiot. Thank you so very much for making my point for me.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:52 pmjust shows either we have long ways to go
June 15th, 2007 at 5:52 pmor
we will never get there
An Official Announcement from the RNC Troll Dept:
In response to several concerns about the errant messaging behavior of CompTROLLER V-1, we regret to announce that CT V-1 went “offline†several weeks ago. We sent out several technicians but as they are skilled only in the latest technology, they could do little with the antiquated programming architecture and physical plant of CT V-1.
As near as we can tell, its fact-distortion algorithm was corrupted when it actually tried to grapple logically with a fact-based argument from one of TP’s longtime posters. When the facts kept adding up against the position held by CT V-1, it apparently blew a circuit board, which is why we now advise all trollson staff against actually addressing arguments head-on.
Our field ops told us the best thing to do would be to let CT V-1 roam the blogosphere, and its batteries would probably run out of juice before its screwed-up logic did too much damage to our side. Unfortunately, the batteries were the only thing that were built well on the thing. They’re the same batteries that the Mars Rover had.
Therefore, our best recommendation is, if you enounter CT V-1, please try not to draw any attention to it. It can only hurt our side.
Thank you.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:53 pmI find it highly ironic that ANY right-winger would even be considered for a “freedom of speech” award. Freedom, by it’s very nature, only exists if it exists for everyone. There is no such thing as freedom if only some people have it.
Similarly, the right-wing noise machine, ranging from Savage and Limbaugh to Fox news are not interested in Free Speech. Every word they say and every action they take is designed to SILENCE free speech, and especially the free speech of anyone who has a different viewpoint from them.
To argue that Savage is an example of free speech is like saying Bush is an advocate for peace…or someone that incites a riot is an advocate for order. No. It doesn’t work that way. You can’t actively work towards silencing other people, whether that be through being loud or by demeaning others or by having your viewers/listeners threaten them, and then say it’s free speech. It can’t be free speech if you are encouraging a system of widespread social behaviour that oppresses the very thing you are hiding behind.
There is a strong difference between dissenting opinions and disagreements, and spreading hate and encouraging ignorance to suppress dissent. Contrary to what people like Savage would have us all believe…freedom is NOT slavery.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:53 pmcompTROLLER V-1, have you seen ROBOTROLL lately? I miss that cold, heartless machine…
*sniff*
June 15th, 2007 at 5:53 pmComment by whiteyfresh
I am Robotroll.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:55 pmYou explain things rather well. Did you say you were a teacher?
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 15, 2007 @ 5:48 pm
My response to you was pasted from the two links I posted. Since I cannot do the research myself to show that Americans are mostly progressive intehir values, I had to look to experts for an explanation. Can’t take credit for something I didn’t write, but thanks.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:55 pmcompTROLLER V-1, have you seen ROBOTROLL lately? I miss that cold, heartless machine…
*sniff*
Comment by whiteyfresh — June 15, 2007 @ 5:53 pm
RNC Troll Department, any help?
June 15th, 2007 at 5:55 pmi
June 15th, 2007 at 5:56 pmam
IRON
WHITEY!!!!
I am RNC Troll Department
June 15th, 2007 at 5:56 pmwow, you’re quite the multi tasker….
June 15th, 2007 at 5:57 pmI am RNC Troll Department
Comment by CompTROLLER V-1 — June 15, 2007 @ 5:56 pm
No you’re not
June 15th, 2007 at 5:57 pmThe postings from my other two aliases, RNC and Robotroll, are rather creative. I might post something later.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:58 pmRoboTroll 3100 reports:
Left-wing censorship is bad.
It is unfair to censor Michael Weiner Savage simply based on the content of his mesage.
Let the marketplace decide!
June 15th, 2007 at 6:00 pmCome on Rachel, knock it off already… No one enjoys your posts but you.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:01 pmSavage was not on C-Span because he is a right winger that doesn’t hold any punches. As for the emails that were written to C-SPAN, has anybody ever read the posts from the progressives here? Much worse than any of those.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:03 pmThinkprogress should do a report on the “prison rape” callings from commentators on their own blog.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:05 pmHas anyone ever notice that Michael Wiener and Ann Coulter have never been seen in the same room, at the same time?
June 15th, 2007 at 6:06 pmSavage was not on C-Span because he is a right winger that doesn’t hold any punches. As for the emails that were written to C-SPAN, has anybody ever read the posts from the progressives here? Much worse than any of those.
Comment by yep — June 15, 2007 @ 6:03 pm
My guess is that Savage wasn’t on C-SPAN because he sent a DVD and C-SPAN is in the business of covering events and public affairs. Since he didn’t show up in person to speak, C-SPAN probably decided against videotaping a video display.
By the way, how come when a Democrat doesn’t want to go on Faux news, he’s a “coward” but when Savage doesn’t want to go anywhere in public he’s a “right-winger that doesn’t hold any punches”?
June 15th, 2007 at 6:07 pm20 bucks for a speech the f*ck did not have the basic professionalism to give in person! What a parasite!
I….I am having a hard time trying to pin down what that makes the people who buy it.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:08 pmThis is just a typical reflection of Savage’s audience. Just a bunch of frustrated angry lunatics.
Weiner is a hate-filled paranoid loonie who never makes a coherent argument. His entire schtick is based on bashing 3 things: dems, libs, and da jooooooz.
Pathetic.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:11 pmOne of the things I loved about the hate mail sent to C-SPAN was the tone of the “I’m never going to watch your stupid network” stuff. As if they ever had, or ever would watch anything but FoxSnooze. Savage clearly appeals to the mouth breathers among the Wingnuts.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:12 pmMy guess is that Savage wasn’t on C-SPAN because he sent a DVD and C-SPAN is in the business of covering events and public affairs. Since he didn’t show up in person to speak, C-SPAN probably decided against videotaping a video display.
By the way, how come when a Democrat doesn’t want to go on Faux news, he’s a “coward†but when Savage doesn’t want to go anywhere in public he’s a “right-winger that doesn’t hold any punches�
Comment by spit take
They covered the event and he received an important award. If they agreed with what he said they would have aired it. I don’t know the reason he was not there, so I cannot comment as to your question.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:12 pmThis is just a typical reflection of Savage’s audience. Just a bunch of frustrated angry lunatics.
Comment by kelso
When people post here with hate filled comments ridden with insults and profanities, is that a reflection of the TP audience?
June 15th, 2007 at 6:16 pmyou want some good reading, take a gander at the hate mail bag on democraticunderground.com some time. Some really smart folks there.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:16 pmOne of the things I loved about the hate mail sent to C-SPAN was the tone of the “I’m never going to watch your stupid network†stuff. As if they ever had, or ever would watch anything but FoxSnooze. Savage clearly appeals to the mouth breathers among the Wingnuts.
Comment by gummitch
Savage rips Fox News often on his talk show.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:16 pmSavage rips Fox News often on his talk show.
Comment by yep
Like I said: mouth breathers. Thanks for making my point.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:21 pmThey covered the event and he received an important award. If they agreed with what he said they would have aired it. I don’t know the reason he was not there, so I cannot comment as to your question.
Comment by yep — June 15, 2007 @ 6:12 pm
Why do you assume that they didn’t air it because they didn’t “agree” with what he said?
It’s very likely that the video and sound quality would have been substandard when played through whatever playback system was set up (probably hastily) and C-SPAN would refuse to air it.
Last I checked, C-SPAN didn’t make its programming choices based on what it “agreed with” or “didn’t agree with”. That’s Faux News.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:24 pmThe Savage Weiner is “reclusive?”
Right. The Savage Weiner is a frightened little excuse for a man who couldn’t stand up to an angry Nun. The little coward is afraid to leave his own house. He needs to broadcast from his basement studio and sends his wife to the store for him because he fears he will be confronted by an angry citizen of laid-back Marin County. The last time he left his house in Marin, a woman yelled at him and he called the police. Conservatives. Trust me on this. You really don’t want to throw your lot in with this little huckster who used to be a Marxist before he was hawking food supplements on late-night infomercials. The more you learn about him the more you’ll understand.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:25 pmSavage verbally attacked a homeless person in San Francisco. He didn’t like being asked for money so he started screaming that the homeless guy was a communist. Savage makes a ton of money by stirring up hatred. It’s ridiculous to give the senseless moron all this publicity.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:29 pmMichael Savage is obviously not responsible for the content of these emails.
Obviously? Really?
June 15th, 2007 at 6:31 pmThe Savage Weiner on gay marriage: “It’s child abuse.”
The Savage Weiner to a gay man on the telephone: “Screw you. I hope you get AIDS and die!”
And, when a woman in the grocery store calls him a fascist, he calls the police and whines. Later, he has his wife go to the store for him.
Be proud, conservatives. Be very proud to have such an exemplary human being as one of your spokespersons.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:34 pmBrian Lamb saying, “dickhead.” Priceless.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:35 pmI listen to Savage once every couple of months, just to get my read on how insane his audience is.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:35 pmDoesn’t surprise me one bit to see them threatening (empty threats, of course as they are mostly inbred dirtbag hilbillys).
It must be uncomfortable for them, sitting in piss soaked underwear so much of the time.
Brief synopsis of Wienerboy: http://tinyurl.com/druhp
June 15th, 2007 at 6:39 pmomg that is just brilliant!!!!!!!!!!!
June 15th, 2007 at 6:39 pmOne would not have to wonder too hard what Savage’s loyal flock would say about people such as Dennis Kucinich and Lt. Ehren Watada, who have the temerity to think for themselves.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:41 pmHe wants to send a message to all the loony right wing NeoCOns that he is the craziest mother fu*ker, so the right wingers will love him more.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:42 pmWhy do you assume that they didn’t air it because they didn’t “agree†with what he said?
It’s very likely that the video and sound quality would have been substandard when played through whatever playback system was set up (probably hastily) and C-SPAN would refuse to air it.
Last I checked, C-SPAN didn’t make its programming choices based on what it “agreed with†or “didn’t agree withâ€. That’s Faux News.
Comment by spit take
It is likely that they didn’t air because of quality, but they have not said that. It is also likely that they see him as a fanatic and they don’t want his views on.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:44 pmHe wants to send a message to all the loony right wing NeoCOns that he is the craziest mother fu*ker, so the right wingers will love him more.
Comment by Spudge_Boy
I disagree.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:45 pmI say:
Then you say:
Then you disagree with what I said. Very strange.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:48 pmClassic Savage Weiner: “I choose to override my desires for men when they swell in me waiting out the passions like a storm, below decks.”
Priceless.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:49 pmBrian Lamb needs to take the CSPAN2 Book channel down and put on non-stop tape loops of Repugniscums lying before Congress and the American people!
Don’t get me wrong, I love CSPAN. But, Brian needs to help with some heavy lifting here outside of the non-stop book tour every weekend. I like books. But, CSPAN is and was always supposed to be about showing what the government is up to.
Brian, if you want a book channel how ’bout startin’ one. I’ll watch.
But, Brian, I need CSPAN to be the window into our government 24X7 or I need a new CSPAN.
What will it be Brian. A government channel or book/history part time channel?
June 15th, 2007 at 6:50 pmSavage is a Weiner.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:51 pmthe content of the emails would be funny if they showed an iota of creativity and/or intelligence . what they DO show is the average I.Q. of a savage listener/waahhhhpublican to be hovering around the number of calories in a diet coke…zero.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:52 pmThen you disagree with what I said. Very strange.
Comment by Spudge_Boy
I was saying that C-SPAN may see him as that, you were referring to him catering to his listeners (wanting to show he is the craziest mother f**ker.) I don’t understand why you see that as strange.
June 15th, 2007 at 6:52 pmIt is likely that they didn’t air because of quality, but they have not said that. It is also likely that they see him as a fanatic and they don’t want his views on.
Comment by yep — June 15, 2007 @ 6:44 pm
It is also likely that they see him as a fanatic and they don’t want his views on.
Oh, and have they said THAT?
What about C-SPAN’s actions in the past leads you to immediately conclude that it was Weiner’s fanaticism that was the deciding factor? Because it’s such a tool of the left wing?
June 15th, 2007 at 6:57 pmI was saying that C-SPAN may see him as that, you were referring to him catering to his listeners (wanting to show he is the craziest mother f**ker.) I don’t understand why you see that as strange.
Comment by yep — June 15, 2007 @ 6:52 pm
You said C-SPAN might see him as a fanatic. I said he is trying to prove he is a crazy mother fu*ker. Do you know what a fanatic is? It is a crazy mother fu*ker.
June 15th, 2007 at 7:00 pmyep, what the Savage Weiner is obviously doing is playing down to the low average IQ of his fans because he may be a self-loathing, closeted homosexual and a maniac, but he’s not dumb. You are, evidently, a fan.
June 15th, 2007 at 7:01 pmYou said C-SPAN might see him as a fanatic. I said he is trying to prove he is a crazy mother fu*ker. Do you know what a fanatic is? It is a crazy mother fu*ker.
Comment by Spudge_Boy
You said that he was trying to prove he is the craziest. I don’t agree with that.
June 15th, 2007 at 7:02 pmOne more time, because it’s just priceless:
Michael Weiner: “I choose to override my desires for men when they swell in me waiting out the passions like a storm, below decks.â€
June 15th, 2007 at 7:03 pmOh, and have they said THAT?
What about C-SPAN’s actions in the past leads you to immediately conclude that it was Weiner’s fanaticism that was the deciding factor? Because it’s such a tool of the left wing?
Comment by spit take
No they haven’t said that, but msm does see him as a fanatic.
June 15th, 2007 at 7:04 pmYeah, it is hard to be the most fanatical right winger. There is always some other crazy mother fu*ker trying to prove they are more fanatical about the NeoCons.
June 15th, 2007 at 7:06 pmIf the Savage Weiner is not the craziest, who is? Who has been kicked off television for saying “inappropriate” remarks? Who hides in his basement while calling people cowards? Who feels “swelling below decks” for men while spouting the most homophobic rhetoric on the radio? Who thinks the Dixie Chicks should be arrested for treason? Who thinks Senator Bernie Sanders should be shot?
Please. I’m interested and I’m calling on conservative talk show listeners to enlighten me. Who is crazier than the Savage Weiner?
June 15th, 2007 at 7:13 pmThe comments are interesting, but there is no mention of how effective it was for Brian Lamb to read some of the e-mails on air in his dry flat tone. I think its hilarious and probably a good way to illustrate how fucked up Savage’s listeners are. I would pay $20.00 to hear Lamb read all of the mail. Good stuff.
June 15th, 2007 at 7:13 pmClearly, the craziest mother fu*ker on the radio, Internet and TV is George W Bush.
June 15th, 2007 at 7:15 pm“If the Savage Weiner is not the craziest, who is? Who has been kicked off television for saying “inappropriate†remarks? Who hides in his basement while calling people cowards? Who feels “swelling below decks†for men while spouting the most homophobic rhetoric on the radio? Who thinks the Dixie Chicks should be arrested for treason? Who thinks Senator Bernie Sanders should be shot?
Please. I’m interested and I’m calling on conservative talk show listeners to enlighten me. Who is crazier than the Savage Weiner?
Comment by Ret. Col. Jack Ripper — June 15, 2007 @ 7:13 pm”
angry tranny annie coulter comes to mind then again when “her” estrogen shots start slamming into her naturally produced testosterone there’s bound to be some insanity so, we can excuse “her” to a certain extent
June 15th, 2007 at 7:18 pmThose emails sound like they are coming from the trolls here.. poor language, poor spelling,…. just plain filthy emails.
It just goes to show the hatred influence weener has on his audience. The 10 - 15% brain washed by these right wing hate America talk show hosts are in need of some serious therapy. Very sad.
June 15th, 2007 at 7:22 pmIf Michael Savage wants to see a brownshirt, he should look in the f*cking mirror!
The “have a nice day, d*ckhead” comment shows just how trailer trash his listeners are. Rush Limbaugh. Michael Savage. Glenn Beck. Bill O’Reilly. Ann Coulter. Sean Hannity. It doesn’t matter. The same army of neanderthal rednecks listen and listen religiously. Makes your stomach churn.
June 15th, 2007 at 7:23 pmTP left out a few facts in its abbreviated paragraph. One, C-Span’s program director decided not to air the speech because it was a DVD, and C-Span doesn’t air DVDs.
Two, C-Span offered to air Savage’s speech live (later time) and Savage refused. (I think, but I’m not sure, that Brian Lamb also said C-Span offered Savage to come on the show or air a part of his show, but don’t remember exactly the scenario.) I do know that C-Span offered Savage live coverage after the fact and Savage refused.
Three, Savage’s people who emailed C-Span, the majority of the emails read that their tax money should no longer go to C-Span, since they refused to air the speech. Some were contacting their congress people. Funny thing, though, is that C-Span is 100% a private company and receives no taxpayer money, whatsoever. And for those who are regular C-Span viewers know that… as it is said continually by the hosts.
Four, I don’t know the impetus for this, but Brian Lamb showed the entire email, with the sender’s email address included. Unless I’m mistaken, he’s never done that before. When people emailed in support of C-Span live during the show, Brian showed those emails, minus the abbreviated headers, (not showing the email address). I think that’s hysterical, and I suspect that will be another thing Savage gets savage about.
Five, it was pretty funny when Brian pointed out a misspelling in one of the emails: “sensor”
June 15th, 2007 at 7:25 pmThat same 30 percent is so attached.
June 15th, 2007 at 7:39 pmThis just shows what kind of freaks Savage listeners are.
Here’s a interesting story for you all:
http://www.365gay.com/ Newscon07/ 06/ 061507massarrest.htm
That is, if have the balls to go the website.
June 15th, 2007 at 7:55 pmWhat is it about the unhinged right-wing fringe that they constantly claim a supposed ideological enemy is both a Nazi AND a Stalinist?
Is it really that hard to discern that the Nazis and the Stalinists fought a war against each other? I believe it was called World War 2, but then again, what the hell do I know, I’m a goddamned Yankees and Red Sox fan.
June 15th, 2007 at 8:02 pmThere’s just one thing all you left wing coolaid drinkers are forgetting: namely, Savage is right. Just about everything he says above is true. That’s what we’re up against, and you fools are too brainwashed to know it. Or know it, and are fighting it as hard as you can. But you’re idiots. That’s what we have going for us.
June 15th, 2007 at 8:06 pmGOPers are getting more shrill now. I guess because Bush has only 18 more months as president.
June 15th, 2007 at 8:06 pmMichael Savage is obviously not responsible for the content of these emails.
I would argue about that, given that Savage gave his listeners false information (”CSpan is taxpayer-supported”) and falsely implied that CSpan refused to cover the live event of Savage delivering a speech, instead of the fact that Savage wasn’t even present, and it was a DVD recorded speech that he’d mailed in. Just about every one of the letters that Brian Lamb read included “CSpan is taxpayer-supported” as the basis for their anger and sense that what CSpan did was “unfair.” These are the same people, Savage included, who argue that it’s a corporation’s (Clear Channel’s) right to ban the Dixie Chicks, and block access to the public air waves to anyone it wants.
What Savage did is the best argument for restoring the fairness doctrine.
The chief support of a democracy is an educated people.
June 15th, 2007 at 8:17 pmWhat the hell is coolaid? Get the damned copyright name correct, and use some facts you blithering fumbledick. What is Weiner right about? That he hates himself for homosexual experimentation and drug use as a young man? That referring to fellow citizens as Nazis makes him a sage of our time? It’s always the same with the intellectual midgets — we good — them bad. Junior high rhetoric from junior high minds.
June 15th, 2007 at 8:19 pmI may be an optimist but Brian Lamb is a respected C-SPAN host and this will not set well for very many of his republican watchers. It could be a wake up call for those not yet outraged by the RWers.
June 15th, 2007 at 8:36 pmSavage is a son of a b* that endorses violence.
Several years ago I was listening to his radio show (stopped briefly on the station while scanning the frequencies to see what shit he was spouting that day) and he was talking about a soldier in Afghanistan who said that it was fun shooting the Afghani men because of the way they treated women in that country.
Savage called the soldier an American hero.
June 15th, 2007 at 8:51 pmThe message in the e-mail shown in the screen capture at the top of this thread is indicative of the intelligence of many people in this country, especially those Rightwingers who couldn’t debate themselves out of a paper bag.
Instead of offering thoughtful debate on the subject and suggesting why they thought C-Span was in the wrong, they resort to childish name calling and offer nothing substantial.
In all fairness, yes, I’ll call you a name if I think you deserve it. Dickhead is one of my favorites, especially for idiots on the road who display poor driving habits. However, as many of you know, in most cases I’ll also offer up what I call food for thought and invite discussion/debate.
June 15th, 2007 at 9:01 pmLets see now, Rush’s followers are called dittoheads. Savages REAL last name is WEINER, so would that make his followers WEINERHEADS?
June 15th, 2007 at 9:06 pmThese guys all learned from Joe Pyne was an American radio and television talk show host, who pioneered the confrontational style of hosting in which the host advocates a viewpoint and argues with guests and audience members. Pyne was confrontational with guests on his show and often attempted to throw them off-balance by opening the conversation with an insult. One occasion when this backfired was when he began a dialogue with Frank Zappa by saying, “So I guess your long hair makes you a woman.” Zappa responded with “So I guess your wooden leg makes you a table.”
Then there was Wally George. Wally George was neo-conservative before there was a word for this illness. At the height of its popularity in 1984, fans of the show would wait for several hours to get a choice spot among the studio’s 80 audience seats, where they waved U.S. flags and chanted, “Wal-ly! Wal-ly!” on cue. George engaged guests whom he called “ludicrous liberal lunatics” and “fascist fanatics,” including 1960s drug guru Dr. Timothy Leary and Tom Metzger, a white supremacist leader. Skinheads from Orange County made up most of his audiance.
Morton Downey, Jr. In 1989, as fascination with Downey’s show had begun to wane, he was involved in an incident in a San Francisco International Airport restroom in which he claimed to have been attacked by neo-Nazis who painted a swastika on his face and attempted to shave his head. Some inconsistencies in Downey’s account (e.g. the swastika on his forehead was painted in reverse, suggesting that Downey had drawn it himself in a mirror), and the failure of the police to find evidence supporting his story, led many to suspect that the incident was a hoax and a plea for attention.
They come and they go. If you want them off the air then call their advertisers.
June 15th, 2007 at 9:08 pmComment by JTitor ,
That is a very interesting post and I really liked the Zappa bit, Lol. I just wonder if maybe we should look into emulating the British stricter rules on slander.
June 15th, 2007 at 9:18 pmRe: Comment by Russ — June 15, 2007 @ 8:36 pm
“this will not set well for very many of his republican watchers”
You could be right, but I think part of the exercise Brian went through today was to set the record straight. He did it over and over again. I don’t often give republicans credit, but I think the regular C-Span republican viewers know better and won’t hold C-Span at fault. I think Savage’s followers are too on the fringe, so outside of one of them killing somebody, I think they really have no power. I hope I’m right.
June 15th, 2007 at 9:30 pmNo they haven’t said that, but msm does see him as a fanatic.
Comment by yep — June 15, 2007 @ 7:04 pm
I’m surprised that you didn’t call the MSM the “liberal media.” And I’ve never seen any coverage of Mike the Angry Weiner on MSM, good or bad. You’re just making a pathetic attempt to defend a psycopath.
June 15th, 2007 at 9:55 pmWow. It never occurred to me that people who listent to Michael Savage would email C-Span nasty, threatening letter.
June 15th, 2007 at 9:56 pmWho really cares what this myopic ass thinks? Assuming he’s capable of thought.
June 15th, 2007 at 10:00 pmComment by gooderservice
Thanks, I wish I’d seen the show. I’ll never forget back in pre-Iraq war days when Brian Lamb had a guest on who was a ME expert, who said the war would be a mistake, and there was no connection between laden and saddam? It was so refreshing considering all the other msm was gung ho for war. (just a meaningless little rant there)
June 15th, 2007 at 10:10 pmOMG Those letters are hilarious (OK, and scary), but mostly funny. I wanted him to keep reading.
June 15th, 2007 at 10:30 pmAh yes, Michael Weiner, head of the Weiner Nation.
June 15th, 2007 at 10:45 pmWonder if Savage knuckle draggers know that Michael has a homosexual past and hung out with the likes of Alan Ginsburg?
Comment by null
Screw Weiner’s homosexual past. What about his homosexual present?
June 15th, 2007 at 10:47 pmDid not the right wing listeners kill some talk show host in Denver? Is there not a law against this kind of hate speech by Savage?
Comment by EasyRider
Are you referring to Alan Berg?
June 15th, 2007 at 10:49 pmPeople in this country are naive to what today’s conservatism is all about. Savage’s listeners are just Limbaugh fans without the deceptive bone that allows them to hide what they have been TRAINED to become. The letters to C-span are just a little window into what the right has been breeding down on the farm for a couple of decades. You ever listen to Savage’s show? This will all get much much worse. If you think it will stay at letter writing you are a fool.
Savage and Rush condition their followers like cult leaders do - a steady diet of “we are being persecuted” - “it’s us vs. them” - “we know what the real America is and they do not” - this is how cults operate and CONTROL the minds of their followers.
This country is tubes. Bush is pissing on the constitution everyday - the man of lawlessness is at hand - and being cheered on by the mouth breathers who have been coinditioned into an alternative reality; a treasonous, trained group which WILL continue take us all to hell.
Talkers magazine must be the biggest fraud to roll into town in long time.
June 15th, 2007 at 10:49 pm“Thanks, I wish I’d seen the show. I’ll never forget back in pre-Iraq war days when Brian Lamb had a guest on who was a ME expert”
Maybe I am foolish but I am guessing his less than intelligent callers called him things like “terrorist-sympathizer” or “Muslim-lover”.
June 15th, 2007 at 10:50 pmMaybe I am foolish but I am guessing his less than intelligent callers called him things like “terrorist-sympathizer†or “Muslim-loverâ€.
Comment by JPark — June 15, 2007 @ 10:50 pm
Now you got me interested to see if they did, because I don’t think they did, but my memory is not the greatest.
June 15th, 2007 at 11:02 pmRuss, I am going to look into it but if they didn’t I will eat my shorts.
June 15th, 2007 at 11:05 pmActually that would depend on the year. 2003 they didn’t have the talking points yet.
June 15th, 2007 at 11:10 pmRuss, I am willing to bet my eating cotton vs. the right wing a$$holes knee-jerking their way through any situation. They are a bunch of cowards.
June 15th, 2007 at 11:30 pmSavage is dangerous, and so are his listeners obviously. It’s only a matter of time before that ranting lunatic brainwashes some follower into being the next Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols, and Eric Rudolph, or James Kopp.
There’s no doubt in my mind that maniacs like the anthrax mailer get their marching orders from listening to Savage and his ilk, just like he got them all angry about CSPAN.
Even Trent Lott has seen the light about right-wing radio.
June 16th, 2007 at 1:17 ambrianS, I agree with you on Savage. I think Limbaugh and the Fox boys are pretty minor (I don’t think their listeners are likely to go nuts, well, more than they are). Savage is truly hateful in the McVeigh way. It is only a matter of time til he gets his audience to go violent.
June 16th, 2007 at 1:36 amFairness Doctrine, anybody?
June 16th, 2007 at 1:38 amRepublic, the Fairness Doctrine has to come back. Funny thing is those righties that tell us there is a liberal media…aren’t so much for it.
June 16th, 2007 at 1:40 amSavage does have an audience, that needs to be told what to hate, When to hate, But not how to hate…………………………..
June 16th, 2007 at 2:59 amRobt, they already know how to hate.
June 16th, 2007 at 3:02 amFairness Doctrine, anybody?
Comment by The Republic of Stupidity — June 16, 2007 @ 1:38 am
Republic, the Fairness Doctrine has to come back. Funny thing is those righties that tell us there is a liberal media…aren’t so much for it.
Comment by JPark — June 16, 2007 @ 1:40 am
Of course they don’t want it back. It was the elimination of the Fairness Doctrine (thank you, President Reagan) that made a Rush Limbaugh, Michael “Savage” Weiner, and Sean Hannity possible. If it were still in place, I’m sure we never, ever would have heard of any of them.
But give them a chance to spew their venom unchallenged over the airways, and they know they can find an audience for it. You rarely, if ever, hear a dissenting voice on any of the top three talk radio shows (the three I mentioned, and all conservatives.) But you constantly hear dissenting views on the liberal talk radio shows. And the host always destroys their arguments, often quite easily because the dissenting conservative isn’t tuned into the truth and, therefore, the arguments he makes don’t stand up.
June 16th, 2007 at 3:14 amWayne, I absolutely know they don’t want the Fairness Doctrine. There is nothing fair about the Limbaugh control (I don’t know why. Who would trust that a$$hole?)
June 16th, 2007 at 3:20 amThere is nothing fair about the Limbaugh control (I don’t know why. Who would trust that a$$hole?)
Ditto heads. And millions of them (if Talkers is to be believed).
June 16th, 2007 at 3:35 amI actually like the way Brian handled this. Served these writers right for their right-wing writings exposed to the mass. Especially how Brain maintains his pure amber-neutral demeaner.
June 16th, 2007 at 3:42 amEspecially how Brain maintains his pure amber-neutral demeaner.
Comment by Jessquire — June 16, 2007 @ 3:42 am
That’s one thing I love about Brian Lamb. I watched once when a caller almost immediately going into a diatribe about Jews and Brian calmly leaned over, cut off the caller, and said, “We don’t need to listen to that.” and went on to the next call. Completely unflappable.
June 16th, 2007 at 3:44 amSavage is an idiot , and anyone who listens to him probably has the IQ of crap.
June 16th, 2007 at 3:52 amSavage is an idiot , and anyone who listens to him probably has the IQ of crap.
Comment by Karim — June 16, 2007 @ 3:52 am
I think you owe crap an apology there, friend. :)
June 16th, 2007 at 3:55 amWithout wishing to make light of the nasty and offensive e mails, it was still rather funny to hear Brian Lamb recite the word “dickhead”. It reminded me of the one and only time my grandmother made a reference to sex.
June 16th, 2007 at 6:34 amNaz-i-tis n. Mental disorder of right-wing degenerates, in which they call everyone in sight Nazis. Occurs more frequently when they know their party is dead.
June 16th, 2007 at 7:35 amwait until the racist redknecks and the racist chicanos clash. You want to see “ugly”. just be patient. once the mexican invasion makes its way to the redkneck population the sht is gonna hit the fan and go flying everywhere
June 16th, 2007 at 11:26 amThis is the most hilarious video EVAR!!!
I just loved it when Brian Lamb said “dickhead” on C-Span.
This video is a CLASSIC!!!
June 16th, 2007 at 11:54 amGo Savage
June 16th, 2007 at 1:04 pmI’d rather someone shoot me in the balls with a paintball gun than have this jackass get a reward for anything but being the penultimate bigot.
June 16th, 2007 at 1:24 pmI don’t really see a problem with this use of free speech… Anybody see the same, exact thing happen when us liberal types get pissed off about the curtailing of free speech and start a mass mail campaign? Change “Stalinist” and “homosexual” for “hillbilly” and “industrialist scum” and you have the same emails from the other side. If people don’t like something because of perceived injustice they tend to send out insulting emails, which are sometimes hilarious in their wording - is there really a story here? Seems par for the course to me — free speech for all, and if ya don’t agree with them or Savage, ignore ‘em.
June 16th, 2007 at 1:59 pmFact: When Savage and Ginsburg were “together” in San Francisco, Michael was Ginsburg’s “wide receiver” if you know what I mean.
June 16th, 2007 at 2:14 pmThe future of the country? C’mon people. Sure these people can vote, but they will never dictate political discourse in any significant way. They are very simple minds, and get rallied to these causes because they are incapable of any independent thought. Ungrateful bastards. Who do they think is paying for all their abortions and street signs? Certainly not the ‘moral majority’.
June 16th, 2007 at 2:23 pmI really enjoyed this video :D
Jane
June 16th, 2007 at 3:07 pmhttp://www.spaml.com
I for one am dissappointed in the bigotry here, both in that video and on this board.
June 16th, 2007 at 3:10 pmSavage is your typical over the top closeted homosexual zionazi neocon, appealing to both white American trailer scum and Israel firsters. He is just one of the mouthpieces of hate on radio these days wholoathes gays, lesbians, liberals, women, muslims, East Indians, abortion, atheism, intellectuals, minorities, Buddhists, pacifists, Quakers, and any animal he can’t cook in his oven and eat. He is the radio’s Jewish Josef Goebbels.
June 16th, 2007 at 3:46 pmSavage is just so stupid. Does he even know the English language?
I agree with #6. Savage is a non-issue and not worthy of conversation anywhere at any time.
June 16th, 2007 at 3:59 pmI don’t get it: The Dems are always calling the Republicans fascists. For every one piece of what you would call “fascist” legislation sponsored by a Republican in the last 60 years, I’m sure I could count at least a dozen bills sponsored by Democrats that use the coercive power of government to control how people behave or how they live their lives. New Deal anyone? The difference is that you people support Democrat-sponsored coercion (i.e., genuine fascism) because you think the intentions are good and anyone who doesn’t is just a fascist, racist, misogynist, polluter, greedy right-wing nut who deserves it. The result is you dumb morons freely give up your freedoms (and mine) faster than any Republican “fascist” ever could. Michael Savage, McDonald’s, Exxon, and whatever person or organization of people you hate can’t put you in jail or a gun to your head.
June 16th, 2007 at 4:01 pmAnd they call themselves - christians. HA They are fascists who don’t know the meaning of the neo-fascist Bush crime family. Anybody who even listens to the savage is just a Kook Aid drinking idiot. No critical thinking skills, the Kook Aid took care of that.
God you trolls are just pathetic. Why are you not all serving the oil war in Iraq??? Oh that’s right, you reich wingers are just all show and no go when it come to fighting for more oil for the Bush crime family.
ALL REICH WINGERS Republithugs GO TO IRAQ, otherwise, STFU.
June 16th, 2007 at 4:26 pm“Michael Savage is obviously not responsible for the content of these emails.”
Don’t be ridiculous. Of course he’s responsible! He goaded them into it, didn’t he?
He’s been spewing hatred for years. How can anyone claim he’s not responsible for the results?
June 16th, 2007 at 4:30 pmOpps sorry, I forgot to mention that these “christians” are following a closet case gay person in “the savage”. They vilify gay people and then they turn around and worship someone with the morals of an alley cat, like savage and least we forget, matt drudge is also a closeted gay person. Are all the reich wingers closet gay people?? No, I doubt it, maybe only 1/2 are.
June 16th, 2007 at 4:33 pmStrange.
Dennis Miller joked not too long ago that at least when you get threats from the far right, the words are spelt correctly.
I don’t think that’s a truism anymore. The far right these days seems to consist of the most imbecile-like uneducated simpletons truly indicative of the ‘extra chromosome set’ as George H. W. Bush once described them.
June 16th, 2007 at 5:24 pmlol
June 16th, 2007 at 5:31 pmHah. Dennis Miller. The name itself, is a joke. He’s about as funny as a paper towel. And Savage, he’s just another right-wing hate monger.
June 16th, 2007 at 5:46 pmHey! I’m an atheist and a Republican.
If I had to choose between living in a society filled with people who believed in the Golden Rule or people like yourselves who believe individuals are the property of the State (or “society” or “the common good” or whatever Socialist utopia), I’d choose the dumb but well-meaning Christians.
And if I had to choose between people handing me copies of The Watchtower or telling me I should follow Jesus (all of whom I can just ignore) and a government that can put me in jail if I don’t pay social security taxes, send my children to school, or refuse to hire the right kinds of people, or whatever well-meaning real, genuine government facism you morons support, I’d choose the annoying but harmless Christians.
All of you idiots bashing Christians, real and the hypocrites, are fighting the wrong enemy. Only the government can harm you. Harness your energy limiting the role of government, not supporting Democrats in expanding it!
June 16th, 2007 at 6:17 pm“What is Weiner right about? That he hates himself for homosexual experimentation and drug use as a young man? That referring to fellow citizens as Nazis makes him a sage of our time? ” said HumboldtBlue
You better stay away from that Humboldt Green HumboltBlue. I get a kick out of you silly little propagandists. You all are right by the book, you think everyone is as stupid as you are, and that you can trot out the same claptrap, and everyone is going to eat it up.
Keep it up, we need the constant reminder of just how impotent you really are.
June 16th, 2007 at 7:14 pmI am a conservative and I have never liked Savage- he is too… Savage. He has a foul mouth and he comes off as a nut. I never listen to him.
As far as laws preventing what he has said? That is a dangerous place to go because then it becomes who’s judgement to decide what “hate speech” is? Freedom of Speech is a bedrock of a free society. But you can’t have the good without the bad. There will always be someone like Savage. You can’t let one bad apple (or two, or three etc) spoil the whole bunch.
June 16th, 2007 at 8:03 pmWhy do Republicans hate America?
June 16th, 2007 at 9:06 pmI used to run Savage’s show on the radio. I still liked him better than Hannity, but I like food poisoning better than Hannity.
Anyway, Savage would often seem to forget how to do a radio show. At least once every week or so, he would just keep talking through the end of his show. No wrap up, no verbal indicator that he knew the time was getting short… he would just keep talking until the sounder cut him off. It was a weird thing, and it only happened at the end of his show. Maybe his producers aren’t signaling him at the end? Maybe he loses his mind completely? I dunno, but it was weird.
And he loves his little dog. He would bring it into the studio and talk to it on the air. Some awful, awful radio there…
June 16th, 2007 at 10:20 pmComment by johnsom — June 16, 2007 @ 7:14 pm
How many people a day tell you that you’re an assh*le? Do you need all your fingers and toes to count that hight?
June 16th, 2007 at 10:45 pmHe talks too much about 911 truth, he will be fired
June 16th, 2007 at 11:19 pmDr. Savage is a gift from God. There’s no one out there that’s as articulate, perceptive, honest, knowledgeable and fearless as he is. We live in times where it’s become fashionable to slam and marginalize Caucasians. Many Liberals in the media, like Ted Koppel, made a career out using their far-reaching soapboxes to poison the minds of millions with the message: “White people, especially white men, are holding you down and treating you like crap!” As a result of their lies, we now have black-on-white crime that has reached epidemic proportions (though the Liberals have made sure to keep it under wraps, i.e. out of the national spotlight, as in the case of the “Wichita Massacre”, for example). Very slowly, many of us (Caucasians) are coming around to what these shameful Liberals are doing, and so it’s with much gratitude and joy that we love hearing the brilliant Doctor Savage keeping us informed of what the evil-doers are up to. We’re so angry with them and all of the crap they’ve done to us over the decades, and so now — finally!! — the pendulum is starting to move in the other direction! God Bless and protect Dr. Michael Savage!!!
June 16th, 2007 at 11:43 pmLol, ya got the looneys where ya want them.
June 17th, 2007 at 12:42 amIf these are the people that support the right good riddance to the bad rubbish, they sound alot like the British before we kicked their asses off our land.
Behold the mighty power of the Savage Weiner — a “dick army” by any measure — totalitarian fascist uninformed asswipe blowhards who live on the lies of their radio icon.
The vast majority of thise misguided weiner strokers complained that their tax dollars were being misappropriated, as just one example of how bone-deep stupid these people are.
Of course, reality and truth don’t matter to a zipperhead — it’s all about fomenting hatred, and no lie is too egregious as long as it whips a zipperhead into a mouth-foaming frenzy.
Mr. Lamb did a tremendous public service by putting their mindset on display for all to see.
June 17th, 2007 at 7:26 amOtis, you must’ve fallen asleep at your last KKK meeting where they went over the part about Jews not being Caucasian. Michael “Savage” Weiner (and his dog too, for all we know) is part of the “Jewish-controlled media.”
Horrors! The Jews have infiltrated your Caucasian mind and you didn’t even know it! How sneaky!
You better head on over to the Stormfront web site and bone up on who you should be hating, because they just might lynch your Caucasian ass if you say the wrong thing at the next cross burning.
June 17th, 2007 at 7:42 ama beautiful new era is dawning in america - this summer will see the U.K.’s total pull out of iraq, this, as the “surge” has evidently failed, and miers and the blond tart testify before the senate and congress. this as libby is pardoned - and the HUGE blowback that will draw. we are witnessing - the TOTAL collapse of the bush administration. there is a god. the tide has turned, and soon the atmosphere will be that of a dying star, turning into a black hole. hopefully, a worm tunnel that leads straight to hell for bush, his administration, and his supporters - God’s Speed!
June 17th, 2007 at 8:00 ami think the fact that he is charging 20 bucks a pop for a speech says a lot.
June 17th, 2007 at 9:26 am“As for the emails that were written to C-SPAN, has anybody ever read the posts from the progressives here? Much worse than any of those.”
If, in your lexicon, R