ABC’s Charles Gibson slams Fox News
By on Jun 18th, 2007 at 4:52 pm
ABC’s Charles Gibson slams Fox News
in a commencement address at Union College on Saturday:
[D]on’t disparage the mainstream media. The editor of your hometown newspaper or the producers of network newscasts don’t have 30 or 40 years of experience for nothing. When you see a news organization get fixated on non-stop coverage of Paris Hilton, or Anna Nicole Smith, or Michael Jackson, go elsewhere.
When an announcer says, “It’s a report you have to see,” you probably don’t. When an anchor says, “shocking details,” they probably aren’t. When a reporter claims his news is “fair and balanced,” it probably isn’t. And, when politicians say, “I’m going to level with you,” they probably won’t.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
The funny this is, I’ve spent some time in Communist and Socialist regimes doing media work… and Fox News is the EXACT M.O. (that’s modus operandi Lil) that all of them use to force BS news on the oppressed people of their countries. Fake news, lack of reporting bad issues for the empowered, derision of politcal opponents, and spin spin spin is what you will find on the propagandistic media outlets.
When will the morons that watch Fox realize that’s all that channel is? I think Gibson accurately described Fox and “slammed” is a bit of an insult to the word slammed.
June 18th, 2007 at 3:43 pmAnd we all trust ABC for good honest news… But for non-stop Paris Hilton no one beats Nancy Grace :).
June 18th, 2007 at 4:59 pmRusty – I agree with you but the 28%ers who watch it, do so because they like their “news” pre-digested and regurgitated so they don’t have to use any of their double-digit IQ on anything other than watching American Idol, Professional wrestling or NASCAR while mouth breathing to Kfed’s latest song.
June 18th, 2007 at 5:00 pmooohhhh, charlie really slammed them good eh?
June 18th, 2007 at 5:00 pmAlthough I would hardly call Charlie a “Pillar of Journalistic Achievement”, he makes some good points!
June 18th, 2007 at 5:04 pmYeah I’d say thats hyperbole characterizing what he said as “slamming” Faux noise.
June 18th, 2007 at 5:05 pmFOX knows the recipe that appeals to conservatives and it feeds it to them 24/7. it is all about money and power for Ailes and Murdoch. The subtext that runs through most of FOX news is so apparent and visible. The shame is that so much of this country feels just the way FOX portrays them. You know, the life was so much better in the 50’s with the Beaver and all. (I am black, so it WASN’T!) Thats FOX though, thank GOD we have other media outlets.
June 18th, 2007 at 5:06 pmdo you really mean to say ’slam’? don’t go all huffington post on me and start abusing that word too.
when somebody gets slammed it means to hit somebody hard, either physically, or in your case, with a verbal tirade so acerbic it would make the victim cringe to show his/her face in public.
your charlie gibson story, who’s a tool by the way, has none of that. you hype the story so we’ll read it. congrats, mission accomplshed, but now i’m worried your trying to ’sell’ me.
i’ll accept that from lesser blogs, but you my friend, are a flagship and I expect better from you.
June 18th, 2007 at 5:12 pmThe problem, Mr. Gibson, is not too much Paris Hilton. It is not enough Downing Street Memo stories, PNAC stories, failure to investigate WMDs before pre-emptive war, too many incestuous relationships between those in power and those(YOU) who should be a watchdogs, too much compromsing of journalistic principles for huge Network advertising dollars, too many late night calls from those in power instructing your people to “kill” stories as a favor, too much being the informational arm of the WH, etc. etc. ad nauseum. In reality, ABC is no better than FOX. The packaging a little more refined, but an organization that serves the powerful more than the public.
June 18th, 2007 at 5:13 pmHe wasn’t slamming FOX, he was poking fun at his whole industry…
TP, at one time I would have expected more from you, but I just don’t know anymore.
June 18th, 2007 at 5:15 pmWhen will the morons that watch Fox realize that’s all that channel is?
They never will realize it. I’m sure that you know that they don’t want to realize it. Ignorant people don’t like to face the fact that they are wrong, so they will continue to live a lie and to degrade those who speak truth to them. They will call names and make stuff up, just as long as they don’t confront their mistakes. They live in a paradyme that they think this is the way the world is. When you confront them with facts, their minds just cant’ acknowledge them and they then resort to name calling. It’s the same in all societies.
June 18th, 2007 at 5:25 pmTP, at one time I would have expected more from you, but I just don’t know anymore.
Comment by PRIMVS INTER PARES
That’s ok, most of us here posting on TP expect nothing but nonsense from you.
June 18th, 2007 at 5:28 pmSadly none of the majors are that good–ABC/Disney has a frozen moral compass, too. NPR and BBC are considerably better.
June 18th, 2007 at 5:39 pmComment by Lescoeurs — June 18, 2007 @ 5:13 pm
Spot on!
June 18th, 2007 at 5:59 pmThis is proof that ABC News has a Librul agenda.
June 18th, 2007 at 6:14 pmI hereby issue a red neck Fatwa on Charles Gibson and ABC.
All Fox “News” useful idiots are to send harrassing emails and fake anthrax letters to the above aforementioned entities.
Sincerely, Roger “Jabba the” Ailes.
(this is called sarcasm for you ignorant 28 percenters)
I gotta say, this was more of a dig then a slam. I mean to say it is a slam would be overstating what he said. Not to say he wasn’t spot on though.
June 18th, 2007 at 6:29 pmWhat? A Lobtard that makes a bit of sense? Has the barnacle fell off the whales ass?
June 18th, 2007 at 6:54 pmoxymoron – FOX NEWS
June 18th, 2007 at 7:04 pmSaying that Fox news ‘probably’ isn’t fair and balanced doesn’t amount to ’slamming’ them.
In fact it’s lamest almost-criticism of them I’ve ever heard.
June 18th, 2007 at 7:21 pmGibson slammed himself.
June 18th, 2007 at 7:33 pmWho would have guessed the Charles Gibson would be the voice of reason?
June 18th, 2007 at 7:40 pmRe #3: Upside00
This household is very progressive, very educated; yet we still watch NASCAR. My husband watches more than I, as he grew up in North Carolina (left there 30+ years ago).
Painting everyone with the same brush gives liberal bloggers a bad name. Try to keep it civil and understand the world is made up of many diverse personalities. Not all NASCAR fans have a “double-digit IQ”, and stating so demeans you, not me.
June 18th, 2007 at 7:41 pmI agree Lescoeurs, it’s not enough PNAC, or actually it’s not being reported at all, nor is the neocon connection to Bush, so Gibson maybe correct about Fox, which is like saying the sky is blue, he nor is channel has NEVER reported about the PNAC document that we progressives found out about a long time ago, the BLUE PRINT for Bush’s attack on the Middle East.
June 18th, 2007 at 7:46 pmOther words Gibson never utters, “OCCUPATION” or WHY is the bush government building such a HUGE high tech embassy if they are NOT planning for a permanent OCCUPATION.
“Is there any connection between Karzai’s oil pipeline deal, after taking power and the occupation of Afghanistan, and the history of the U.S. willing to work with the Taliban, to build that pipeline”. Gibson will NEVER, NEVER assert or question the connection between the Caspian OIL, the U.S. military and the permanent occupation of Afghanistan or Iraq.
What a fraud Gibson is. If you read his whole speech, he talks about how important it is for those young people in attendance to participate in their democracy, to be involved. Yet, when it comes to his own profession – a failing profession, no less – the most he can muster is “go elsewhere”. Sorry, Charlie, but it doesn’t work like that.
June 18th, 2007 at 7:53 pmMr. Gibson, put your money where your big lying mouth is. Now is the time for you to cover all the earth-shaking stories you INTENTIONALLY IGNORED to protect the neo-cons.
Remember all these stories you passed on which has effectively killed our Democracy:
(1) Downing Street Memos…Smoking gun proof of being lied into the Iraq War
(2) Disappearance of Habeas Corpus…Poof!! most of the Bill of Rights Disappears
(3) The strategic importance of running that oil pipeline through Afghanistan
(4) Borrowing trillions of dollars from the Communist China to fund the Iraq occupation.
(5) Oil executives secretly meeting with Dick Cheney to plan America’s energy future and possibly staking their claim of Iraq’s oil.
(6) Sibel Edmonds being silenced and denied her day in court and what she knows about 9/11.
(7) Your total lack of reporting on Bush’s 500+ Executive Orders/Signing Statements
(8) Americans eating genetically altered food, no testing ever done on humans, food not labeled.
(9) Iraq Hydrocarbon Law…THE REASON for the invasion which would give BP, Chevron etc 80% of Iraq’s Oil Profits for 30 YEARS!…Robbing the country of THEIR wealth.
(10) Bush’s private extreme right-wing mercenary army Blackwater operating under no authority in Iraq. (And why the hell does the President have his own provate army??)
(11) Rove’s/Tim Griffin Cagin List of black, mexican and native american voters, many who are soliders in Iraq. Millions voted but they were “caged” out of their votes which were never counted.
(12) A Newsweek poll from Oct. 06 showing 50%+ Americans favored impeachment.
(13) Presidential Directive NSPD51 giving Bush dictatorial powers in event of ANY emergency he deems worthy.
Mr. Gibson I could go on and on and on. Please explain your dead silence on all these stories??? You and your network are little different from the propagandists at Fox. You are just a different more subtle form of dis/mis information.
June 18th, 2007 at 7:59 pmThe way I read it, he slammed Wolf Blitzer twice, Fox News once, and all politicians. When I read “report you have to see” and “shocking details,” I heard Blitzer’s voice. No question that Fox is the largest purveyor of manure out there, except of course for the individual shovelers like Kristol, Limbaugh, and Coulter who have other venues. But Gibson’s indictment was more universal. I think the “Gibson Slams Fox News” headline is a bit off the mark.
June 18th, 2007 at 8:19 pmOf course Charles Gibson slams Fox News. this is not News , ABC News Ratings being in The Tank is News , and with Fox New’s Rating being Sky High what else can he do but go WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
June 18th, 2007 at 9:26 pmi knew there was a liberal media
June 18th, 2007 at 9:50 pmNo, the blueprint for the invasion of Iraq along with refence to all alternative and previous plans can be found in the book Cobra II.
The PNAC ’securing america’s defenses’ document was a policy recommendation, which at this point has been derailed by reality.
June 19th, 2007 at 5:18 amAll news outlets are the same… whether you have the extreme right (Fox News) or the extreme left (just about everything else). If he’s “slamming” Fox News, then he should just as easily be slamming all the rest of the news networks.
June 19th, 2007 at 9:46 amAll news outlets are the same… whether you have the extreme right (Fox News) or the extreme left (just about everything else). If he’s “slamming†Fox News, then he should just as easily be slamming all the rest of the news networks.
Comment by Xlr8r — June 19, 2007 @ 9:46 am
And what planet are you from?
June 19th, 2007 at 10:41 amand charles gibson has the teeny balls to talk! he represents everthing that is wrong and evil about the media if not the world . i would not expect the correct time from him if asked.
June 19th, 2007 at 1:15 pmYes, you’re right, most have a single digit IQ. I polled our very educated, progressive household and found it unanimous: fox sucks, nascar is on fox, and charlie gibson holier than thou.
The preceeding message is not meant for children. Coming up next, something we would never show you.
you said:
Re #3: Upside00
This household is very progressive, very educated; yet we still watch NASCAR. My husband watches more than I, as he grew up in North Carolina (left there 30+ years ago).
Painting everyone with the same brush gives liberal bloggers a bad name. Try to keep it civil and understand the world is made up of many diverse personalities. Not all NASCAR fans have a “double-digit IQâ€, and stating so demeans you, not me.
June 19th, 2007 at 1:30 pm